Climate and Environmental
Changes: Impact, Challenges and
Solutions
A Proceeding book of National Conference
Sponsored by CST, UP
Organized by
Sacred Heart Degree College, Sitapur
in Collaboration with DDUGDC Sitapur
on Feb 28- March 1, 2017
Editors
Dr. Yogesh Chandra Dixit
Dr. Himanshu Trivedi
Climate and Environmental
Changes: Impact, Challenges and
Solutions
A Proceeding book of National Conference
Sponsored by CST, UP
Organized by
Department of Zoology
Sacred Heart Degree College, Sitapur
A Minority Institution Accredited by NAAC with Grade-B
(Ailiated to CSJM University Kanpur)
in Collaboration with DDUGDC Sitapur
on Feb 28- March 1, 2017
Editors
Dr. Yogesh Chandra Dixit
Head, Deptt of Zoology
Deptt of Zoology
Sacred Heart degree College
Sitapur
shdcstp@gmail.com
Dr. Himanshu Trivedi
Assistant Professor
Deptt of Agricultural
Sciences and Engeneering
IFTM University
Moradabad
www.shdcstp.org
First published in India in 2017 by Invincible Publishers
Copyright Dr. Yogesh Chandra Dixit and Dr. Himanshu Trivedi 2017
ISBN: 978-93-86148-89-6
Dr. Yogesh Chandra Dixit and Dr. Himanshu Trivedi assert the moral right
to be identiied as the authors of this work.
he authors are solely responsible for the contents of the papers compiled
in this volume. he publishers or editors do not take any responsibility for
the same in any manner. Errors, if any are purely unintentional and readers
are requested to communicate such errors to the editors or publishers or
authors to avoid discrepancies in future.
Invincible Publishers
G - 120, Sushant Lok III, Sector 57, Gurgaon-122022
---------Opposite Kasturba Ashram, Radaur Distt Yamuna Nagar, Haryana- 135133
Content
Sl no.
Title and Author(s)
Page No.
1
Regulation of Global Warming for
Cleaner Environment
Renu Rastogi
1
2
Mosquito Population: Impact of
Climate And Environmental Changes
And Its Management Strategies
Kalpana Singh and Shilpa Nandan
7
3
Biodiversity of Cyanobacteria (Blue
Green Algae) in Rice Fields Of
Rawatpur, Unnao District
Hemant Kumar and Jitendra Mohan
16
4
Behaviour of Silver Pheasant
(Lophura-nycthemera)
Dr. Rachana Singh
24
5
Efect of Climatic Changes on
Forensic Entomo Fauna.
Reema Sonker and Kalpana Singh
30
6
Impact of Climate and
Environmental Changes ON Muscid
Flies
Kalpana Singh
36
7
Biological Detergent for A
Sustainable Environment
Rita Awasthi, Deepti Shikha and Sanjay
Kumar Awasthi
40
8
Biodiversity of Sarcophagid Flies
Kalpana Singh* Anil Kumar and
Reema Sonker
48
9
Organic Agriculture and Climate
Change
Virendra Singh and Satybhan Singh
54
10
House Plants: Let the Nature Step In
Himanshu Trivedi, Shama Parveen,
Parul Punetha1, Shailja Punetha2
Yogesh Chandra Dixit
74
11
Scope of Organic Vegetable
Production
Shailaja Punetha1, Parul Punetha2
Meenakshi Arya3& Himanshu Trivedi
85
12
Importance of Micro Organisms in
Agriculture
Satybhan Singh, Virendra Singh and
Krishan Pal
93
13
Epidemiology of Potato Viral
Diseases and heir Management
A.N. Chaubey and R.S. Mishra
118
14
Digitalis: A Potential Cut Flower
Parul Punetha1, Himanshu Trivedi2
and Shailja Punetha
135
15
Development Of Water Management
Systems In India
Nikhil Agnihotri,
139
16
Concept of Modern Irrigation
Method for Crop Production
Ram Kumar and Shikha Sachan
146
17
Enhancement of Water Use Eiciency
In Irrigated Agriculture For Eicient
Water Management
Shikha Sachan,V. K. Chandola and
Ram Kumar
151
18
Essential Oils: A New Frontier in
Food Preservation
Ritesh Mishra
162
19
Jatropha or Biofuel Endorsement in
India
Nikhil Agnihotri & Jitendra Mohan
181
20
CNSL – An Unique Biomaterial for
Coatings
Deepti Shikha & Rita Awasthi
188
21
he Conlict Between Seed Bill and
PPVFR Act of India
Shama Parveen, Himanshu Trivedi and
Aradhana Singh
197
22
Fungal pathogens associated with
some edible ishes of LakhimpurKheri District, Uttar Pradesh.
Dixit, Y.C.,
213
23
Roles of NGOs and heir Efects on
Economy
B. Mishra
224
24
Organic Farming and Green Growth
For Sustainable Development
Sunita Arya
227
25
Applications Of Nanotechnology
In Health Sciences
Nikhil Agnihotri & Sangita Avasthi
240
26
Natural Products – Drug for
yesterday, today and tomorrow
Dr. Krishna Kumar Singh
256
54 | Climate and Environmental changes: Impact,Challenges and Solutions
ORGANIC AGRICULTURE AND CLIMATE CHANGE
Virendra Singh and Satybhan Singh
Department of Agricultural Sciences and Engineering,
IFTM University, Moradabad- 244 102, India
E mail: virendra.singhed@gmail.com
INTRODUCTION:
Climate change is a natural process but recent trends in climate
change are alarming due to food security. Climate change before now
also afected the people and ecosystem, presently a great challenge
for the people especially for poor and developing community.
Climate change is the signiicant challenge for crop production and
food security in 21st century. Industrial and agriculture revolutions
result in emission of several gasses, including carbon dioxide (CO2),
methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O). he increased level of
greenhouse gasses has created green house efect which inluences the
rainfall pattern and global temperature all around the world. Surface
temperature is projected to rise over the 21st century under all
assessed emission scenarios. It is very likely that heat waves will occur
more oten and last longer, and that extreme precipitation events
will become more intense and frequent in many regions. he ocean
will continue to warm and acidify, and global mean sea level to rise
(IPCC, 2014). here are various evidences that greenhouse gases are
responsible for climate change. Emissions of greenhouse gasses may
be reduced by minimize the use of fossil fuel and chemical fertilizers.
Agriculture plays an important role in climate change due to the
importance of climate change for agriculture’s production basis and
because of the large emissions of greenhouse gases from agriculture.
In agriculture is more important climate change challenge- it must
adopt changes and at the same time reduce emission of greenhouse
gasses. One third carbon dioxide come from changes in land use
pattern by shiting cultivation, deforestation and intensiication of
agriculture. Approximate most of the nitrous oxide and two third of
methane emission comes from agriculture.
55 | Climate and Environmental changes: Impact,Challenges and Solutions
Agriculture land use in 1990s has been responsible
approximately 15 per cent of all greenhouse gasses emission. Farm
yard manure, nitrogenous fertilizers and lowland paddy cultivation
are said to be responsible for producing most agricultural nitrous
oxide and methane emissions. Methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide
(N2O) are 23 and 296 times more powerful greenhouse gases than
CO2, respectively. Intensiication of agriculture has consumed heavy
amount of fossil fuel and chemical fertilizers, contributed expressively
greenhouse gasses emissions. In last 40 years’ greenhouse gasses
emission increased as double due to increase in the use of nitrogenous
and phosphatic fertilizers in irrigated intensive cultivation (FAO,
2008). Globally, agriculture contributes 65-80% of total nitrous oxide,
mainly from nitrogenous fertilizers. Nitrous oxide emissions from
soils are due to the unproductive loss of mobile Nitrogen. Any nitrogen
input (mineral and organic fertilizers, biologically ixed N, crop
residues) and the mineralization of nitrogen compounds in soils,
contribute to the emission of N2O. Especially in agricultural soils,
elevated N2O production depends on the nitrogen fertilization level.
Methane emission is mainly from paddy ields, burning of crop
residues and ruminants.
Inluences of climate change on agriculture are both negative
and positive. For example, increase in temperature helps to cultivate
crops on high altitude areas. It increases the length of growing season,
allowing earlier sowing and harvesting. he increased temperature
also supports the natural decomposing of organic matter at higher rate.
Causes of climate change
Anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions have increased since the preindustrial era, driven largely by economic and population growth, and
are now higher than ever. his has led to atmospheric concentrations
of carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous oxide that are unprecedented
in at least the last 800,000 years. heir efects, together with those
of other anthropogenic drivers, have been detected throughout the
climate system and are extremely likely to have been the dominant
cause of the observed warming since the mid-20th century.
56 | Climate and Environmental changes: Impact,Challenges and Solutions
On other hand, higher temperature provides favorable conditions for
insect pest. Higher temperature, longer growing period and high night
temperature favors in multiplication of insect pests. Climate change
disturbs the pattern and range of rainfall and evapotranspiration
processes which afect soil moisture storage, run-of and water
absorption by the plants. Both lack of and access of water afect the
diferent stages of plant production. Moisture stress during lowering,
pollination and grain-illing stage is harmful to most of the crops.
Increased evaporation from soil and accelerated transpiration in the
plants themselves will cause moisture stress condition. Researches
have shown that increased concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere
increases the likelihood of higher absorption of CO2 inside the plant
through stomata during photosynthesis which provides carbohydrates
for plant growth. Crop species vary in their response to CO2 according
to their physiological class i.e. C3 versus C4 plants.
he developing countries are already in poverty and food
crises. Climate change also another challenge to meet them. Climate
change will have serious impact on human life, environment and world
economy. Poor people who are completely depend on agriculture
mostly realized by climate change. Increasing crop failure and deaths
of livestock are serious issue of economic losses with them. Drought
and problem of drinking water are more frequent in tropics. he
increased frequency of lood, drought and soil erosion decreases the
productivity of agriculture sector.
ORGANIC AGRICULTURE
Organic agriculture is an old age practice in India. Organic
manures were prepared and applied from ancient time in India.
Before green revolution period the rate of national agriculture growth
was not able to keep pace with population growth. his was the
major factor for introduction and popularization of high yielding
varieties of crops, which were responsive to chemical fertilizer and
irrigation. As a result, total food grain production increased from
50.82 million tonnes in 1950-51 to 264.00 million tonnes in 201314. his increase can be attribute primarily adoption of high yielding
varieties combined with other green revolution technologies in cereal
57 | Climate and Environmental changes: Impact,Challenges and Solutions
crops specially wheat and rice, expansion of gross irrigated area and
increase in fertilizer consumption (0.07 million tonnes in 1950-51 to
25.54 million tonnes in 2012-13). It changes in the position of India
from a food importer to net food exporter in many commodities
(Ravishankar et al., 2016)
Efect of unscientiic use of chemical inputs under Green
Revolution and the end result
S. N.
1. Yield
Sustainability
Efect/End result
·
·
Deinite deceleration of crop yields over years
Crop failure and losses
2. Soil
degradation
·
·
·
·
Nutrients exhaustion, deiciencies and imbalances
Salinity, sodality and acidity
Reduced fertility and productivity
Accumulation of toxic substances and heavy metals
3. Ground water
·
·
Depletion and poor quality
Extra cost and energy to lit
·
·
Imbalance in soil lora and fauna and destruction
Elimination of biodiversity and destruction of
biological balance
Elimination of natural enemies of pests viz.
parasites and predators
Resistance in pests to chemicals
4. Ecology
·
·
5. Environment
·
·
Pollution of soil, water and air
Accumulation of toxic heavy metals and nonbiodegradable substances from inputs
58 | Climate and Environmental changes: Impact,Challenges and Solutions
6. Social and
economic
problems
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
Serious health hazards
Permanent or partial disability of farm workers
High inputs
Proitability decline
Loss increases
Export constraints afecting national economy
Rural economy ruined due to over-dependence of
outside inputs like seed, fertilizers
and plant protection chemicals
he organic farming is a holistic production management
system, which promotes and enhances agro ecosystem health, including
bio-diversity, biological cycles and biological activities. One of the
biggest outcomes of organic farming is healthy soil that is alive with
beneicial organisms. If relies on a concept of “Farm as an Organism”.
Organic farming excludes the use of certain synthetic inputs, such as
synthetic fertilizers, pesticides, herbicides and genetically modiied
organisms (GMOs). In post, independent India, the farming relied on
heavy and indiscriminate use of chemicals as fertilizers and pesticides
suited to high yielding and nutrient responsive crop varieties. he
excessive use of chemicals over the time has started posing problems
to animal and human health due to persistency of residues in food
items. Leaching down of chemicals from soil renders ground water
unit for drinking and irrigation. Besides, the chemical residues
also harm the beneicial soil microbes and fauna (earthworms)
resulting in degradation of soil fertility. he pesticide problem got
compounded in the country because many pesticides banned abroad
are manufactured dumped and sold freely. Consequent upon these
complications, farmers and policy makers are now pondering to “Can
We Feed the World Better”?
India has comparative advantage over many other countries
because the vast cultivated areas remained free of contamination for
chemicals. Northern and North Eastern hills and rainfed areas that
rely on low to zero use of agro-chemicals, can be instantly converted
to organic farming. Farmers in these areas oten use organic manure
as a source of nutrients that are readily available either in their own
farm or in their locality.
“Organic” in agriculture is a trade term that denotes a product,
59 | Climate and Environmental changes: Impact,Challenges and Solutions
produced/processed in accordance with set standards and duly
certiied by an accredited certiication body.
According to the Codex Alimentarius Commission, “organic
agriculture is a holistic production management system that avoids use
of synthetic fertilizers, pesticides and genetically modiied organisms,
minimizes pollution of air, soil and water, and optimizes the health
and productivity of interdependent communities of plants, animals
and people” (CAC, 2001).
To encounter these objectives, organic agriculture farmers
need to implement a sequence of practices that optimize nutrient
management and minimize risk, such as crop rotations, intercropping
and improved crop diversiication, diferent combinations of livestock
and plants, use of biofertilizers with legumes, application of organic
manure and biological pest and weed control measures. All attempts
should be focused on the utilization of on farm resources (Vogt, 2000).
he formation of International Federation of Organic
Agriculture Movements (FOAM) in 1972 at international level and
National programme for Organic Production (NPOP) in 2002 in India
brought about standards for production, processing and handling of
organic products. Similarly, he Codex Alimentarius Commission,
a joint FAO-WHO Food Standard Programme, has also developed
guidelines for the production, processing, labeling and marketing
of organically produced foods. In recent years, many countries have
legislated organic production, including the EU nations (1990s),
Japan (2001), and the US (2002).
In world, 50.9 million ha area in 172 countries and with 2.5
million producer is under organic agriculture. India is highest number
of producers (585200) followed by Ethiopia and Mexico (IFOAM,
2017). India’s rank in terms of World’s Organic Agricultural land
was 15 as per 2013 data (Source FIBL & IFOAM Year Book 2015).
he total area under organic certiication is 5.71 million ha (201516). his includes 26% cultivable area with 1.49 million ha and rest
74% (4.22 million ha) forest and wild area for collection of minor
forest produces. India produced around 1.35 million MT (201516) of certiied organic products which includes all varieties of food
products namely Sugarcane, Oil Seeds, Cereals & Millets, Cotton,
60 | Climate and Environmental changes: Impact,Challenges and Solutions
Pulses, Medicinal Plants, Tea, Fruits, Spices, Dry Fruits, Vegetables,
Cofee etc. . he production is not limited to the edible sector but
also produces organic cotton iber, functional food products etc.
Among all the states, Madhya Pradesh has covered largest area under
organic certiication followed by Himachal Pradesh and Rajasthan.
(APEDA, 2016). Sikkim state has been declared as organic state from
January 2016 and has highest net sown area (100%) under organic
certiication.
Principles and Components of Organic Farming:
According to the IFOAM the organic community has adopted
four basic principles and may be classiied as organic agriculture:
he principle of health
he principle of ecology
he principle of fairness
he principle of care
Essential components of organic farming are keeping the soil
alive through efective management of natural resources. hey are as
follows:
Enrichment of Soil: Ends the use of chemicals,
use crop residues as mulch, use of organic and biofertilizers, crop rotation and multiple cropping, avoid
excess tilling of soil covered with green mulch or
biological mulch.
Management of temperature: Keep soil covered,
plant trees and bushes on bunds.
Conservation of soil and rain water: Water harvesting
by digging farm ponds and maintain contour bunds
in sloppy land, adopt contour row cultivation and
maintain low height plantation on bunds.
Combination of animals: Animals are important
components of organic farming not only they provide
animal produce but also provide enough dung and
urine for use as organic source of nutrients.
Maintain diversity: Maintain diversity at farm and
develop habitat for substences and create enough
61 | Climate and Environmental changes: Impact,Challenges and Solutions
diversity.
Use of renewable energy: Use of eco-friendly energy
sources such as solar energy, bio-gas and others.
ROLE OF INDIAN GOVERNMENT IN DEVELOPMENT AND
PROMOTION OF ORGANIC FARMING IN INDIA:
National progamme on organic production (NPOP) started
in 2000
Organic logo launched in 2002
National center of organic farming started in year 2004 at
Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh
As part of 10th Five-year Plan, Government of India has
earmarked about Rs. 100 crores for the promotion of organic
agriculture in the country.
Sikkim declared as organic state on 18th January 2016.
Organic agriculture also reported to be climate change
resilience farming systems as it promotes the proper management of
soil, water, biodiversity and local knowledge there by acting as a good
option for adaptation to climate change. But, due to lack of proper
research, the contribution of organic agriculture for climate change
adaptation and mitigation is yet to be known. It is argued that organic
agriculture positively contributes to ofset negative impacts of climate
change (Khanal, 2009)
ORGANIC FARMING IN MITIGATION CLIMATE CHANGE
Use of on Farm nutrient sources
Organic farming realizes on farm nutrient sources. he use
of external inputs is limited in organic farming systems. Synthetic
chemicals like fertilizers, pesticides and plant growth promoters are
banned in organic farming. Williams et al. (2006) calculated the total
primary energy burden of conventional wheat production in the UK
to be allocated by 56% to mineral fertilizers and by 11% to pesticides.
Pimentel (2006) calculated similar results for corn in USA, 30–40%
for fertilization and 9–11% for plant protection for wheat and corn.
hese emissions are avoided by organic agriculture. However, where
labor is not available and conditions allow it, organic management
62 | Climate and Environmental changes: Impact,Challenges and Solutions
might require more fossil fuel energy for machinery due to the use
of mechanical weed control. A comparison of seven organic and
conventional crops carried out in the UK showed a higher energy
demand for machinery for all organic products. However, the higher
energy demand for machinery did not outweigh the energy savings
from foregoing synthetic fertilizers and pesticides. he total energy
use per product unit was lower for organic systems in all cases except
for carrots, where a high-energy demand for lame weeding was
assumed. On average, the total energy demand for organic products
was 15% lower (Anonymous, 2000).
Reduced use of synthetic fertilizers is believed to result lower
yield per unit area. Numerous reports have emphasized the need for
major changes in the global food system: agriculture must meet the
twin challenge of feeding a growing population, with rising demand
for meat and high-calorie diets, while simultaneously minimizing
its global environmental impacts. Here we use a comprehensive
meta-analysis to examine the relative yield performance of organic
and conventional farming systems globally. Our analysis of available
data shows that, overall, organic yields are typically lower than
conventional yields. But these yield diferences are highly contextual,
depending on system and site characteristics, and range from 5%
lower organic yields (rain-fed legumes and perennials on weak-acidic
to weak-alkaline soils), 13% lower yields (when best organic practices
are used), to 34% lower yields (when the conventional and organic
systems are most comparable). Under certain conditions—that is,
with good management practices, particular crop types and growing
conditions—organic systems can thus nearly match conventional
yields, whereas under others it at present cannot. To establish organic
agriculture as an important tool in sustainable food production, the
factors limiting organic yields need to be more fully understood,
alongside assessments of the many social, environmental and
economic beneits of organic farming systems (Verena et. al., 2012).
No one source of nutrient usually suices to maintain soil
organic matter at a desired level as it depends upon availability, market
prices and alternative uses. All organic inputs used to supplement
nutrients do not uniformly supply the nutrients. he aim of nutrient
63 | Climate and Environmental changes: Impact,Challenges and Solutions
management in organic systems is to optimize the use of on–farm
resources and minimize losses. On farm sources of organic nutrient
management are crop rotation, intercropping, farm yard manure,
compost, vermicompost, biogas slurry, crop residue management,
green manuring and of farm sources of organic manures also
beneicial in organic farming system.
CROP DIVERSIFICATION
By non-participation from synthetic input use, organic
agricultural systems cannot but adapt to local environmental
conditions. herefore, species and varieties are chosen for their
adaptability to the local soil and climate and their resistance to
local pests and diseases. Organic farmers prefer not to use uniform
crops and breeds and opt for more robust traditional species, which
they tend to conserve and develop. Additionally, growing diferent
assemblages of crops in time and space seeks to enhance the agroecosystem resilience to external shocks such as extreme weather events
or price variation (Smith and Lenhart, 1996), which are all risks most
likely to increase as the climate changes. Diverse cropping systems
in developing countries do not only rely on cash crops but also on
food crops for household consumption. Currently, most small-scale
farmers are net buyers of food and, thus, highly vulnerable to volatile
food prices (FAO, 2008). An independence from uniform commercial
seeds and imported food increases self-reliance and promotes food
sovereignty. he diversiication of cropping systems also make more
eicient use of available nutrients, with improved productivity and
economic performance, which is of high importance in times of
limited nutrients and inancial constraints (Zhang and Li, 2003).
Agriculture today places great strains on biodiversity, soils, water and
the atmosphere, and these strains will be exacerbated if current trends
in population growth, meat and energy consumption, and food waste
continue. hus, farming systems that are both highly productive and
minimize environmental harms are critically needed. How organic
agriculture may contribute to world food production has been subject
to vigorous debate over the past decade. Two agricultural diversiication
practices, multi-cropping and crop rotations, substantially reduce
64 | Climate and Environmental changes: Impact,Challenges and Solutions
the yield gap to 9+4% and 8+5%, respectively (Lauren et. al., 2015).
Intercropping of leguminous crops also increase the soil nitrogen
status (Singh et al., 2004). Incorporation of Sesbania aculeata residue
added nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium and micronutrient in the soil.
Green manuring Sesbania aculeate ixed more nitrogen biologically
and its residue incorporated in the soil also added higher amount of
organic matter, which is a good indicator of soil fertility and improve
nutrient status in the soil (Singh and Shivay, 2016)
Avoiding Burning of Crop residues
he IPCC estimates that on a global level agriculture’s share
of total anthropogenic emissions amounts to about 50 percent of
methane, about 70 percent of nitrous oxide, and about 20 percent of
carbon dioxide. Sources of methane emissions from U.S. agriculture
include rice, and cattle production. Nitrous oxide emissions depend
on manure, tillage, and fertilizer practices. Carbon dioxide emissions
stem from burning fossil fuels, tillage, deforestation, biomass burning,
and land degradation. CH4 and N2O from biomass burning account
for 12% of the agricultural GHG emissions. Additionally, the carbon
sequestered in the burned biomass is lost to the atmosphere. In organic
agriculture, preparation of land by burning vegetation is restricted to
a minimum (IFOAM, 2002).
Livestock
International Federation of Organic Agricultural Movements
(IFOAM), principle of a harmonious balance between crop production
and animal husbandry. A nutrient excess on the farm does not only
lead to a high N2O emission risk but also to an ineicient use of the
world’s limited resources. Where manure has to be transported over
great distance for application, high energy costs occur. On pastures,
limited livestock density avoids overgrazing. Overgrazing is a risk
factor for land degradation and leads to high soil carbon losses. he
limitation of livestock units per hectare and the lower production
intensity are incentives for multi-use livestock systems. Case study
calculations showed that the methane emissions from milk and beef
production can be reduced more than 20% by keeping double-use
65 | Climate and Environmental changes: Impact,Challenges and Solutions
breeds (i.e., for milk and meat production). Double-use breeds are
normally not kept in conventional systems because of their lower milk
yields, but in roughage-based organic systems, double-use breeds do
not imply further yield losses and hence are more likely to be used.
MANAGEMENT OF ORGANIC CROP LAND
he most important measure to reduce the emission of
greenhouse gasses in organic farming is completely avoidance the uses
of synthetic fertilizers and chemical pesticides. Diverse crop rotations
including catch and cover crops and intercropping of legumes are the
major tools.
Nitrous oxide
N2O are the most important greenhouse gas in agriculture
emission. It contributes 38 percent of greenhouse gas (Smith and
Lenhart, 1996).
Organic agriculture, in contrast, is self-suicient in nitrogen.
Mixed organic farms practice highly eicient recycling of manures
from livestock and of crop residues by composting. Leguminous crops
deliver additional nitrogen in suicient quantities (on stockless organic
farms this is the main source). Badgley et al. (2007) calculated the
potential nitrogen production by leguminous plants via intercropping
and of-season cropping to be 154 million tonnes, a potential which
exceeds the nitrogen production from fossil fuel by far and which is
not fully exploited by conventional farming techniques.
Emissions of nitrous oxide are directly linked to the
concentration of easily available mineral nitrogen in soils. High
emission rates are detected directly ater fertilization and are highly
variable. Denitriication is additionally enhanced in compacted soils.
According to IPCC, 1.6% of nitrogen fertilizer applied is emitted as
nitrous oxide. In organic agriculture, the ban of mineral nitrogen
and the reduced livestock units per hectare considerably reduce the
concentration of easily available mineral nitrogen in soils and thus
N2O emissions. Furthermore, these factors add to lower emissions of
nitrous oxide:
• Diversiied crop rotations with green manure improve soil
66 | Climate and Environmental changes: Impact,Challenges and Solutions
structure and diminish emissions of nitrous oxide.
• Soils managed organically are more aerated and have
signiicantly lower mobile nitrogen concentrations. Both factors
reduce emissions of nitrous oxides.
he on-farm use of farmyard manure – a practice increasingly
abandoned in conventional production – needs to be reconsidered
in the light of climate change. While conventional stockless arable
farms use synthetic nitrogen fertilizers, manure and slurry from dairy,
beef, or from non-ruminant farms have become an environmental
problem. In these livestock operations, nutrients are available in
excess and overfertilization occurs. Emissions of CO2, nitrous oxide
and methane are likely to be very high and water pollution may occur
when manure is treated as waste and not as recycled as a valuable
fertilizer in the crops. Integration of livestock and arable production,
the rule on organic farms, can thus reduce the global warming
potential of food production. his fact is not calculated correctly
in most global warming potential models, however, as livestock
production is generally considered separately from crop systems.
Methane
Methane accounts for about 14% of the greenhouse gas
emissions (Barker et al., 2007). Two thirds of this are of anthropogenic
origin and mainly from agriculture. Methane emissions stem to a
large extent from enteric fermentation and manure management
and in consequence are directly proportional to livestock numbers.
Avoidance of methane emissions of anthropogenic origin and
especially of agricultural origin is of particular importance for
mitigation. Organic agriculture has an important, though not always
superior, impact on reduction as livestock numbers are limited in
organic farms (Weiske et al., 2006; Olesen et al., 2006; Kotschi &
Müller-Sämann, 2004). he data available on methane emissions from
livestock is limited, especially with respect to the reduction of GHG
emissions from ruminants and manure heaps. Some authors suggest
high energy feedstuf to reduce methane emissions from ruminants
(Beauchemin and McGinn, 2005), but the ruminants’ unique ability to
digest roughage from pastures would then not be used. Furthermore,
67 | Climate and Environmental changes: Impact,Challenges and Solutions
meat and milk would be produced with arable crops (concentrates)
where mineral nitrogen is an important CO2 emitter, and competition
to human nutrition might become a problem.
High milk yields per cow reduce emissions per product unit. In
organic systems, ruminants are kept making productive use of fodder
legumes, which play an important role as nitrogen source in organic
crop rotations. Also, many grasslands are not suitable for cropping
due to topography, climate and soils, and the best productive use of
these lands is to keep ruminants on them. High livestock performance
is generally achieved by feeding high-energy crops, which neglects
the unique ability of ruminants to digest roughage. Using crops for
feed rather than food poses substantial challenges to food security;
currently, one-third of the world’s cropland is used to produce
animal feed36, let alone all the inherent environmental problems
that intensive cropping systems pose in terms of high N fertilizer use,
soil degradation and further land clearing. Furthermore, high energy
concentration in animal diets, if not managed very carefully, can lead
to rumen acidiication and secondary inlammations, which is a cause
of animal illness (FAOSTAT, 2009).
Methane emissions from organic rice production and
ruminant production do not difer substantially from those of
conventional production. Better rice production practices in organic
and conventional agriculture, such as avoiding continuous looding
or choosing low methane emitting varieties (Smith and Conen,
2004) could enhance reduction of methane emissions. he multitarget approach of organic farmers and the fact that they are oten
more highly skilled could enhance implementation of improved
production techniques. he main inluencing factors are cultivars,
organic amendments and drainage (Neue et al., 1996). While organic
amendments increase emissions, drainage reduces emissions. Organic
systems add more organic amendments but adding amendments in
times of drainage could avoid higher emissions (Xu et. al., 2000).
As organic systems do not use herbicides, aquatic weeds tend to
be present in organic rice paddies—and weeds have an additional
decreasing efect on methane emissions.
68 | Climate and Environmental changes: Impact,Challenges and Solutions
CARBON SEQUESTRATION
Organic farming sequesters CO2 in the soil
Organic Agriculture has a sequestration potential as it follows
the key principle of tight nutrient and energy cycles through organic
matter management in soils. A second mitigation efect of cash
and cover crops, intercropping and manure is an increased carbon
sequestration in the soil. his is achieved through improved practices
in cropland management and in agroforestry. Various long-term trials
provide evidence that the regular addition of organic materials to the
soil is the only way to maintain or even increase soil organic carbon
(SOC). he systematic development and application of organic
fertilization technologies has been the domain of Organic Agriculture
for many decades and outstanding results have been achieved so far.
Key issues of technology development have been:
To enhance the quantity and application of organic
manure. A close integration of crop production and
animal husbandry and the systematic recycling of
organic waste are basic elements.
To improve organic waste processing techniques to
obtain high quality manure. hrough composting of
animal and plant residues losses in the humiication
process are minimized and a higher proportion of the
solid humus fraction is achieved.
Long and diversiied crop rotations and legume cropping are
further characteristics of Organic Agriculture that help to increase
SOC.
In conventional agriculture, conservation tillage is largely
promoted as a measure to sequester carbon dioxide. his technology
combines minimum tillage with organic covers, herbicides and oten
herbicide resistant GMO crops. Both of the last two are prohibited in
Organic Agriculture. Latest research results revealed that gains in soil
organic carbon have been overestimated and are partly or completely
ofset by increased N2O emissions. hus, it can be concluded that
minimum tillage combined with mineral fertilizer application
compares less well with Organic Agriculture if the focus is on GHGs
in general rather than considering carbon sequestration alone. he
69 | Climate and Environmental changes: Impact,Challenges and Solutions
task of Organic Agriculture will be to integrate conservation tillage in
a way that negative efects are avoided. Agroforesty – a management
system that integrates trees in the agricultural landscape – is another
technology that is systematically applied in Organic Agriculture. It
is a feasible method to succeed shiting cultivation systems but also
to improve and add value to low productive cropland. Agroforestry
holds the biggest potential of agricultural carbon sequestration in
tropical countries. It is worth noting that the sequestration of carbon,
i.e., an increase of soil organic matter is also leading to more fertile
soils, better water retention capacity and reduced nutrient leakage.
In the long term, the removal of GHGs from the atmosphere
through soil carbon sequestration is limited. he level of soil
organic matter does not increase indeinitely in any soil, but reaches
certain equilibrium, depending on the soil and climatic conditions
and management practices (Jonston et. al., 2009). hus, carbon
sequestration in soils is not suicient to achieve a climate neutral
agriculture in the long run, but in the medium term, it can compensate
inevitable agricultural emissions until more neutral production
practices are developed and widely used.
Most of the soil-sequestered carbon is stored as soil organic
matter. In diferent long-term ield trials, organic matter content in
organically managed soils was higher (Marriott, 2006). Soil organic
matter has positive efects on the water-capturing capacity of the
soil. A higher water capturing capacity strengthens the resilience to
droughts and reduces the risk of loods (Lotter, 2003), which are both
more likely to increase with climate change. he need for irrigation
is lowered, which has an additional adaptation and mitigation efect.
Furthermore, soil organic matter enhances the nutrient bufer capacity
and the microbial activity, both strengthening soil fertility.
As a conclusion, Organic Agriculture could contribute
signiicantly to reduce GHG releases and to sequester carbon in
soils and biomass. Secondly, there is suicient evidence that Organic
Agriculture is superior to conventional agriculture. his is even more
important as the capacity of Organic Agriculture to contribute to the
mitigation of climate change can be considered as an ancillary beneit
to its primary goal of sustainable land use. his primary goal is achieved
70 | Climate and Environmental changes: Impact,Challenges and Solutions
by gains in soil productivity, consecutive food security, biodiversity
conservation and many other beneits. he total abstention from
synthetic inputs in organic agriculture has been a strong incentive to
develop agricultural management practices that optimize the natural
production potential of speciic agro-ecosystems, based on traditional
knowledge and modern research. hese strategies can be used to
enhance agricultural communities that have no access to purchased
inputs, which is the case of the majority of the rural poor. he main
organic strategies are diversiication and an increase of soil organic
matter, which both could enhance resilience against extreme weather
events and are recommended by the IPCC. hese strategies have, in
particular, a high potential to enhance the productivity of degraded
soils, especially in marginal areas, while enhancing soil carbon
sequestration. he adaptive approach inherent to organic agriculture
ofers simultaneous climate mitigation beneits.
REFERENCES
Anonymous (2000). Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food of
the United Kingdom. Energy Use in Organic Farming
Systems. MAFF Project Code OF0182, London, UK.
APEDA, (2016). National programme for organic production (npop).
Http://apeda.gov.in/apedawebsite/organic/organic_
products.htm
Badgley, C., Moghtader, J., Quintero, E., Zakem, E., Jahi Chappell, M.,
Avilés-Vázquez, K., Samulon, A. and Perfecto, I. (2007):
Organic agriculture and the global food supply. Renewable
Agriculture and Food Systems: 22(2); 86-108.
Barker T., I. Bashmakov, L. Bernstein, J. E. Bogner, P. R. Bosch, R.
Dave, O. R. Davidson, B. S. Fisher, S. Gupta, K. Halsnæs,
G.J. Heij, S. Kahn Ribeiro, S. Kobayashi, M. D. Levine, D.
L. Martino, O. Masera, B. Metz, L. A. Meyer, G.-J. Nabuurs,
A. Najam, N. Nakicenovic, H. -H. Rogner, J. Roy, J. Sathaye,
R. Schock, P. Shukla, R. E. H. Sims, P. Smith, D. A. Tirpak,
D. Urge-Vorsatz, D. Zhou (2007): Technical Summary.
In: Climate Change 2007: Mitigation. Contribution of
Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of
71 | Climate and Environmental changes: Impact,Challenges and Solutions
the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [B. Metz,
O. R. Davidson, P. R. Bosch, R. Dave, L. A. Meyer (eds)],
Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom
and New York, NY, USA. Available at http://www.mnp.nl/
ipcc/pages_media/FAR4docs/inal_pdfs_ar4/TS.pdf
Beauchemin, K.A., McGinn, S.M. (2005): Methane emissions from
feedlot cattle fed barley or corn diets. Journal of Animal
Science83: 653-661.
CAC (2001) International Food Standards, FAO http://www.fao.org/
fao-who-codexalimentarius/codex-home/en/
Codex Alimentarius Commission. (2001). Guidelines for the
Production, Processing, Labelling and Marketing of Organically
Produced Foods. First Revision. Joint Food and Agriculture
Organisation (FAO) and World Health Organisation (WHO) Food
Standards Program, Rome, Italy. Available at Web site http://www.
codexalimentarius.net/ download/standards/360/CXG_032e.pdf
(veriied 15 October 2009).
FAOSTAT. (2009). FAO Statistical Database Domain on Fertilizers:
Resource STAT-Fertilizers. Food and Agriculture Organization of
the United Nations (FAO) Rome, Italy. Available at Web site http://
faostat.fao.org/site/575/default. aspx#anchor (accessed 7 October
2009).
Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO).
(2008). Soaring Food Prices: Facts, Perspectives, Impacts and
Actions Required. HLC/08/INF/1. FAO, Rome, Italy.
International Federation of Organic Agricultural Movements
(IFOAM). (2002). Basic Standards for Organic Production and
Processing Approved by the IFOAM General Assembly, Victoria,
Canada, August 2002.
International Federation of Organic Agricultural Movements
(IFOAM). (2017). he statistical yearbook “he World of Organic
Agriculture” 2017.
IPCC (2014). Climate Change 2014 Synthesis Report Summary for
Policymakers. Pp.10
Jonston, A.E., Poulton, P.R., and Coleman, K. (2009). Soil organic
matter: Its importance in sustainable agriculture and carbon dioxide
72 | Climate and Environmental changes: Impact,Challenges and Solutions
luxes. Advances in Agronomy101:1–57.
Khanal, Ram Chandra (2009). Climate Change and Organic
Agriculture, Journal of Agriculture and Environment,10: 100-110
Kotschi, J., Müller-Sämann, K. (2004): he Role of Organic
Agriculture in Mitigating Climate Change. International Federation
of Organic Agriculture Movements (IFOAM), Bonn.
Lotter, D., Seidel, R., and Liebhardt, W. (2003). he performance of
organic and conventional cropping systems in an extreme climate
year. American Journal of Alternative Agriculture 18:146–154.
Marriott, E.E. and Wander, M.M. (2006). Total and labile soil organic
matter in organic and conventional farming systems. Soil Science
Society of America Journal 70:950–959.
Neue, H.U., Wassmann, R., Lantin, R.S., Alberto, M.C.R., Aduna,
J.B., and Javellana, A.M. (1996). Factors afecting methane emission
from rice ields. Atmospheric Environment30:1751–1754
Olesen, J.E., Schelde, K., Weiske, A., Weisbjerg, M.R., Asman,
W.A.H., Djurhuus, J., (2006): Modelling greenhouse gas emissions
from European conventional and organic dairy farms. Agriculture,
Ecosystems and Environment112: 207-22.
Pimentel, D. (2006). Impacts of Organic Farming on the Eiciency of
Energy Use in Agriculture. he Organic Center, Cornell University,
Ithaca, NY
Ponisio LC, M’Gonigle LK, Mace KC, Palomino J, de Valpine
P, Kremen C. (2016). Diversiication practices reduce organic to
conventional yield gap. Proc Biol Sci. 2016,
Ravishankar, N, Sharma, SK, Singh, DK, Panwar, AS (2016). Organic
Farming in India. Indian Farming 66(8): 16-23
Smith, J.B. and Lenhart, S.S. (1996). Climate change adaptation
policy options. Climate Research 6:193–201
Smith, K.A., Conen, F. (2004): Impacts of land management on
luxes of trace greenhouse gases. Soil Use and Management20: 255263.
Singh, V, Singh T P and Shivay, Y S. (2004). Efect of cropping
system and phosphorus levels on the Productivity of sorghum and
cowpea. Ann. P1. Soil Res.6(1): 71 - 72 (2004)
Singh, Amarpreet and Shivay, Y S. (2016). Efect of summer
73 | Climate and Environmental changes: Impact,Challenges and Solutions
green manuring crops and zinc fertilizer sources on productivity,
Zn-uptake and economics of basmati rice. Journal of Plant
Nutrition29(2): 204-218
Verena Seufert, Navin, Ramankutty& Jonathan A. Foley (2012).
Comparing the yields of organic and conventional agriculture.
Nature 485: 229–232 (10 May 2012) doi:10.1038/nature11069
Vogt, G. 2000. Entstehung und Entwicklung des o¨kologischen
Landbaus. Reihe O¨ kologische Konzepte 99. Stitung O¨ kologie and
Landbau, Bad Du¨rkheim, Germany.
Weiske, A., Vabitsch, A., Olesen, J.E., Schelde, K., Michel, J.,
Friedrich, R., Kaltschmitt, M., (2006): Mitigation of greenhouse
gas emission in European conventional and organic dairy farming.
Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment112: 221-232.
Williams, A.G., Audsley, E., and Sandars, D.L. (2006). Determining
the Environmental Burdens and Resource Use in the Production of
Agricultural and Horticultural Commodities. Main Report. Defra
Research Project IS0205. Cranield University, Bedford, and the
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Afairs (Defra) of
the United Kingdom Government, London. Available at Web site
http:// www.silsoe.cranield.ac.uk, and www.defra.gov.uk (veriied 15
October 2009).
Xu, H., Cai, Z.C., Jia, Z.J., and Tsuruta, H. (2000). Efect of land
management in winter crop season on CH4 emission during the
following looded and rice growing period. Nutrient Cycling in
Agroecosystems58:327–332.
Zhang, F. and Li, L. (2003). Using competitive and facilitative
interactions in intercropping systems enhance crop productivity and
nutrient use eiciency. Plant and Soil 248: 305–312.