Field Guide to
Seagrasses
of the Red Sea
By Amgad El Shaffai
Edited by:
Anthony Rouphael, PhD
Ameer Abdulla, PhD
Field Guide to
Seagrasses
of the Red Sea
Text and Photographs by
Amgad El Shaffai
Edited by:
Anthony Rouphael, PhD
Ameer Abdulla, PhD
The designation of geographical entities in this book, and the presentation of the
material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of IUCN,
concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or
concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The views expressed in this
publication do not necessarily relect those of IUCN.
Published by: IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Total Foundation, Courbevoie, France.
Copyright: © 2011 International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural
Resources
Reproduction of this publication for educational or other noncommercial purposes
is authorized without prior written permission from the copyright holder provided the
source is fully acknowledged.
Reproduction of this publication for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited
without prior written permission of the copyright holder.
Citation: El Shaffai, A. (2011). Field Guide to Seagrasses of the Red Sea. Rouphael, A.
and Abdulla, A., eds. First Edition. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN and Courbevoie, France:
Total Foundation. viii + 56pp.
ISBN: 978-2-8317-1414-1
This publication is a contribution of the Marine Biodiversity and Conservation Science
Group.
Design and layout: Tasamim Design - www.tasamim.net
Cover picture: Amgad El Shaffai
All photographs used in this publication remain the property of the original copyright
holder.
Photographs should not be reproduced or used in other contexts without written
permission from the copyright holder.
Available from:
IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature)
Publications Services,
28 Rue Mauverney, 1196 Gland,
Switzerland
Tel: + 41 22 999 0000, Fax: + 44 22 999 0020,
Email: books@iucn.org,
www.iucn.org/publications
A catalogue of IUCN publications is also available.
ii
Table of Contents
Foreword --------------------------------------------------------
v
Acknowledgment ----------------------------------------------- vii
Introduction ----------------------------------------------------- 1
Habitats --------------------------------------------------------- 5
General structure of seagrass plants ------------------------- 10
Family CYMODOCEACEAE ------------------------------------- 12
Cymodocea rotundata -------------------------------------- 13
Cymodocea serrulata --------------------------------------- 16
Halodule pinifolia --------------------------------------------- 19
Halodule uninervis ------------------------------------------- 22
Syringodium isoetifolium ------------------------------------ 25
Thalassodendron ciliatum ---------------------------------- 28
Family HYDROCHARITACEAE --------------------------------- 32
Enhalus acoroides ------------------------------------------- 33
Halophila decipiens
----------------------------------------- 36
Halophila ovalis ---------------------------------------------- 39
Halophila ovata ---------------------------------------------- 42
Halophila stipulacea ----------------------------------------- 45
Thalassia hemprichii
---------------------------------------- 48
Glossary --------------------------------------------------------- 51
References ------------------------------------------------------ 53
Field Guide to Seagrasses of the Red Sea
iii
iv
Foreword
The role of taxonomy in understanding and managing marine ecosystems
is pivotal. Taxonomy provides basic and fundamental understanding of
ecosystem components and units (biodiversity) that are important in its
functioning, its maintenance and sustainable use. Without this understanding
it is very dificult to conserve species through targeted management
intervention. The loss of global marine biodiversity at an alarming rate means
that dificult but important decisions have to be made now to protect species
and their habitats. Seagrass populations are declining globally as a result
of habitat destruction and marine pollution. Unfortunately, conservation and
management planning is impeded by a lack of clarity on seagrass taxonomy
or people with the skills and tools to identify species accurately. Accurate
species identiication in the ield would allow more people to understand
and appreciate seagrasses. This is especially true for the Red Sea where
people are taking a stronger interest in its unique natural values. This Guide
is a fundamental step forward in understanding and managing seagrass
species and habitats. It has been developed by the IUCN Global Marine
Program and supported by the Total Foundation for Biodiversity to be an
easy-to-use yet comprehensive ield guide to the seagrasses of the Red
Sea. It has been a great pleasure working with Amgad El Shaffai on this
publication and we hope his efforts will encourage more people to take an
interest in seagrasses and marine habitats in general.
Dr. Ameer Abdulla
Senior Advisor, Marine Biodiversity and Conservation Science
IUCN Global Marine and Polar Program
Dr. Tony Rouphael
Senior Specialist, Tropical Marine Science
Marine Biodiversity and Conservation Science Group
Field Guide to Seagrasses of the Red Sea
v
vi
Acknowledgement
I express my sincere gratitude and profound regard to the editors, Dr.
Anthony Rouphael and Dr. Ameer Abdulla for their interest, guidance,
encouragement, valuable suggestions and constructive discussion at every
stage of the guide.
My gratitude also goes to Professor Moustafa Fouda and Dr. Mahmoud
Hanafy for their technical assistance and encouragement. My thanks to my
colleague and friend Mr. Mohammed Negm for his keen assistance during
years of ieldwork.
I wish to thank Dr. Teresa Alcoverro (CSIC, Spain), Dr. Jent Kornelis van Dijk,
and Dr. Michelle Waycott (both from James Cook University) for taxonomic
review. Also thanks to Dr. Jent Kornelis van Dijk for providing a photograph
of Halophila decipiens.
I thank the Global Marine and Polar Program of the International Union
for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN) for providing the technical platform,
rigorous review, and for publication of this work. Many thanks to the Total
Foundation for Biodiversity for providing the vision and inancial support for
this ield guide.
Field Guide to Seagrasses of the Red Sea
vii
viii
Introduction
Background
Seagrasses are unique amongst lowering plants in that they have adapted
to live immersed in seawater. They lower, pollinate and produce seeds
completely underwater. Seagrasses rank with coral reefs and mangroves
as some of the world’s most productive and ecologically signiicant marine
ecosystems. Seagrasses are food for sea turtles, ishes and dugongs,
and also support complex food webs because of their physical structure
and primary productivity. Unfortunately, human destruction of seagrass
communities is occurring on a worldwide scale. Seagrasses are lost at an
alarming rate due to anchoring, pollution, mining, dredging and
modiications to water movement. More recently, climate change has been
recognized as a signiicant global threat as it may alter local and regional
environmental conditions needed for seagrasses to thrive.
There are about 60 species of seagrasses worldwide, with most restricted
to sand habitats in coastal waters where they sometimes form large
meadows composed of one or more species. Thirteen species of
seagrasses are known from the western Indian Ocean (Gullstrom, et al.,
2002) with 12 species extending into the Red Sea (Lipkin & Zakai, 2003; El
Shaffai, 2011).
The distribution of seagrass in the Red Sea is not well known. This is due
to the Sea´s large size (≈2200 km in length), the remoteness and
inaccessibility of much of its coastline and the lack of guide books to
assist people in recognizing and identifying these plants. Ironically, the
taxonomy of seagrasses in the Red Sea has a long and distinguished
Field Guide to Seagrasses of the Red Sea
1
history. Peter Forsskål, a Swedish scientist and student of the famous
taxonomist Carl Linnaeus, described Halodule uninervis and
Thalassodendron ciliatum from the Red Sea in the 1700s. Much later, den
Hartog (1970) prepared an extensive monograph of the seagrasses of the
world. He summarized seagrass knowledge to provide a comprehensive
guide to all seagrasses described at that time. More recent guides to
seagrasses were prepared by Lanyon (1986) for the Great Barrier Reef,
Waycott, et al., (2004) for the Indo-Paciic region, and Green and Short
(2003) globally. None of these authors discuss the characteristics of the
Red Sea species in particular detail.
Purpose and structure of this guide
The purpose of this publication is to provide naturalists, resource managers
and scientists with a simple guide to identify all species of seagrasses in
the Red Sea. Each species is described in detail using photographs of key
and diagnostic features. Key features are those that distinguish a particular
species from most other species, whereas diagnostic features belong only
to that species.
The guide begins with a description of habitats in the Red Sea that support
seagrasses, followed by an introduction to the features of seagrasses used
for identiication. Each seagrass species is then described individually.
These species are grouped into two families: Cymodoceaceae and
Hydrocharitaceae. Within each family, species are listed alphabetically.
2
Family Cymodoceaceae
Family Hydrocharitaceae
Cymodocea rotundata
Enhalus acoroides
Cymodocea serrulata
Halophila decipiens
Halodule pinifolia
Halophila ovalis
Halodule uninervis
Halophila ovata
Syringodium isoetifolium
Halophila stipulacea
Thalassodendron ciliatum
Thalassia hemprichii
Taxonomic notes
In this guide, seagrass taxonomy follows den Hartog (1970) and Lanyon
(1986) because Halodule pinifolia is distinguished from Halodule uninervis,
and Halophila ovata is distinguished from Halophila ovalis. Although
Waycott, et al., (2004) noted genetic similarities between these related
species, morphological variations of an organism are ecologically important
and warrant identiication and protection.
At the beginning of each species section, the surname of the scientist who
irst described it is presented immediately to the right of the species name.
If two surnames are given, the one in the parentheses is the person who
originally described it, while the second name is the scientist who modiied
the original name, typically by placing it in a different genus.
Only scientiic (or Latin) names are given in this guide. A scientiic name
includes the genus (e.g. Halodule) and species (e.g. uninervis). With a little
practice it is easy to pronounce these words. Most seagrass species do
not have common names, and those that do are not used consistently
amongst regions. For these reasons, common names are not used in this
guide.
Species Diversity in the Red Sea
Seagrasses diversity is uneven in the Red Sea (Figure 1). Seven species are
known from the Gulf of Aqaba and ive in the Gulf of Suez (Green & Short,
2003). The northern part of the Red Sea proper (north of 25° and south of
the Gulfs) has up to eight species. The central Red Sea (18°-25° N) has
the highest seagrass diversity (Jones, et al., 1987), possibly due to greater
diversity of habitats and environmental conditions. The southern Red Sea
has less species than the central Red Sea, possibly due to limited sampling
in remote areas of Yemen, Eritrea and Djibouti. All species in the Red Sea
originated from the Indian Ocean, and at least one species, Halophila
stipulacea, has entered the Mediterranean Sea via the Suez Canal.
Field Guide to Seagrasses of the Red Sea
3
Figure 1. Schematic map represents the seagrass species diversity in the Red Sea based on
published literature (Jones, et al., 1987; Price, et al., 1988; Green & Short, 2003; Fishazion, et
al., 2007 and El Shaffai, 2011).
4
Habitats
The Red Sea contains examples of all the major tropical marine habitats
except estuaries. For the purpose of this guide, three main seagrass
habitats are identiied: i) shallow coastal; (ii) reef; and (iii) deep coastal (refer
to illustration and photographs on pages 6 and 7). These three broad habitat
types differ in terms of water depth and sealoor type (sand versus rock).
Water depth has a major inluence on light levels reaching seagrasses and
light is critical for photosynthesis. Sealoor type is important because most
species can only grow in sand, but a few species can be found on reef.
The shallow coastal habitat, also referred to as a back reef environment, is
characterized by depths shallower than 10 m and a sealoor dominated by
sand. The deepwater coastal habitat relates to waters ranging from 10 to
70 m in depth, the latter being the maximum depth in which seagrasses are
known to persist in the Red Sea. This habitat is also characterized by sand
on the sealoor. The reef habitat is characterized by calcium carbonate rock
mainly formed by coral. Very shallow water habitats are periodically exposed
to air at low tide (the intertidal zone). Exposure to air in the intertidal zone and
extreme levels of light can greatly limit seagrass growth and diversity.
Field Guide to Seagrasses of the Red Sea
5
6
Shallow coastal habitat
Seagrass meadows can be found
in very shallow water near beaches
and mangroves.
Deep coastal habitat
Seagrass in the Red Sea can be
found close to the beach or in
depths of up to 70 m.
Reef habitat
Some seagrass species can attach
to coral reefs, but most are found in
sand.
Field Guide to Seagrasses of the Red Sea
7
Intertidal
Some seagrass meadows are
periodically exposed to air partially
or completely depending on the
tide.
Subtidal
In the subtidal zone, seagrass
meadows are covered completely
by water even at the lowest tide.
The abundance and distribution of seagrasses are inluenced by wave action.
Strong wave action can erode seagrass meadows or inhibit colonization of
unoccupied habitat. Therefore, seagrass meadows in the sheltered side of a
headland and in bays (refer to photographs below) often differ in abundance
and diversity to meadows found in locations exposed to stronger wave
action.
Animals can also inluence the abundance and distribution of seagrasses.
Snorkeling on corals reefs fringing the Red Sea coastline will reveal a ‘halo’
of bare sand between the reef and seagrass meadows. This area of sand
remains free of seagrasses due to sea urchins and other animals that leave
the reef to feed on these plants at night. Dugongs and stingrays can disturb
seagrass meadows while feeding. Burrowing shrimps can also effect
meadows by depositing sediment on top of seagrasses located adjacent
to their burrows.
8
Bay (or Sharm)
A Sharm is the Arabic name for sheltered lagoons and small bays. Seagrass
meadows in bays are often very different from those in habitats exposed to
strong water movement.
Headland (or Ras)
A headland in some areas of the Red Sea is called a Ras. Seagrass meadows
on the windward side differ from those in the leeward or sheltered side.
Field Guide to Seagrasses of the Red Sea
9
General structure of seagrass plants
Above Ground
Leaf, Blade & Stem
Leaf tip
Oval leaf blade
Below Ground
Rhizome & Root
Leaf
sheath
10
Growing tip
Petiole
Vertical
stem
Smooth
rhizome (no
scars)
An individual seagrass plant consist of leaves, stem, rhizome and
reproductive parts, such as lowers and fruits. A diagrammatic
representation of a ‘stylized’ seagrass is shown in Figure 2. Note that this
is a composite diagram of many species used to illustrate variation in the
same structural features among different species. These features are
described in detail under the species descriptions.
Figure 2: A diagrammatic and stylized representation of a seagrass structure which is a merge of
the three major morphological forms of seagrass found in the Red Sea. This does not represent
a single species, but illustrates the characteristics of many species.
Ribbon leaf blade
Leaf tip
Cylindrical
leaf blade
Young leaf
Leaf
sheath
Long
bristles
Cord-like
roots
Scars
on
rhizome
Roots
Field Guide to Seagrasses of the Red Sea
11
Family Cymodoceaceae
12
Cymodocea rotundata
Ehrenberg & Hemprich ex Ascherson
Cymodocea rotundata (Plate 1) is a common seagrass in shallow coastal
water. In the Red Sea it is often found in meadows consisting of two or
more species. This species is widespread throughout the southern and
central regions of the Red Sea, however it has not been found in the Gulfs
of Suez and Aqaba (Lipkin, 1977; Jacobs & Dicks, 1985).
Morphology
Leaf
The leaf blade of this species is 7-15 cm long and 0.2-0.4 cm wide, linear
and lat. The leaf sheath is well developed and ranges from 1.5-5.5 cm in
length. The leaf sheath may be pale purple in color and is not shed along
with the blade. When a leaf sheath sheds, closed circular scars are left on
the stem. There are 9-15 longitudinal leaf veins. The leaf margin may have
small serrations. The leaf tip sometimes appears slightly heart-shaped to
the naked eye. Note that the dark color of the upper section of the leaf in
Plate 1 is due to dead or old tissue. A healthy leaf is green all over.
Stem
This species has a short erect lateral stem at each node, bearing 2-7
leaves.
Rhizome
The rhizome is smooth, with 1-3 irregularly branched roots at each node.
Field Guide to Seagrasses of the Red Sea
13
Microscopic Leaf Anatomy
Cells are round to angular. Tannin (black colored) cells can be seen in round
to rectangular groups (Plate 2).
Similar Species
Cymodocea serrulata has open leaf scars.
Thalassia hemprichii has a rhizome with scars between successive erect
shoots.
Thalassodendron ciliatum has erect stem 10-65 cm in length.
Key Features
Rhizome is smooth without scars
between stems (Plate 3).
Leaf sheath ends with two tips at
the upper side (Plate 4).
Leaf tip is bluntly rounded and
appears slightly heart-shaped
(Plate 5).
Diagnostic Features
Leaf sheath scars fully
encircle vertical stem
‘closed leaf scars’ (Plate
6).
Habitat
Shallow Coastal/Back Reef
14
Reef
Deep Coastal
Leaf tip
Two tips on the
leaf sheath
Close-up
area
Tannin cells
(Plate 2) Mag. 2x
Smooth rhizome
Roots
(Plate 1)
Node
Node
(Plate 3)
Two
tips on
the leaf
sheath
(Plate 4) Mag. 2x
Heart-shaped
leaf tip
Closed
leaf
scars
(Plate 5) Mag. 2x
(Plate 6)
Field Guide to Seagrasses of the Red Sea
15
Cymodocea serrulata
(R. Brown) Ascherson and Magnus
Cymodocea serrulata (Plate 1) is widespread throughout the southern and
central regions of the Red Sea. On the eastern side of the Red Sea, the
abundance of this species increases southward (Aleem, 1979; Price, et al.,
1988). It is uncommon along Egypt’s central and northern Red Sea coast (El
Shaffai, 2011) and has not been found in the Gulfs of Suez and Aqaba (Lipkin,
1977; Jacobs & Dicks, 1985).
Morphology
Leaf
The leaf blade is up to 15 cm long, 0.4-0.9 cm wide and can be linear or slightly
curved. The leaf sheath is purple, broadly triangular, and narrows at the base.
When the leaf sheaths are shed, they leave open, semi-circular scars on the
stem. There are 13-17 longitudinal leaf veins and the leaf margin is serrated
with obvious tooth-like projections. The leaf tip is bluntly rounded and also
serrated.
Stem
This species has a short erect vertical stem often with ibrous roots at each
node.
Rhizome
The rhizome is smooth. The color can be yellow, green or brown depending on
its health and exposure to light.
16
Microscopic Leaf Anatomy
Cells are generally angular in shape (Plate 2).
Similar Species
Cymodocea rotundata has closed leaf scars.
Thalassia hemprichii has a rhizome with node scars with small leaves
between successive erect shoots.
Thalassodendron ciliatum has 10-65 cm long erect stems. Also the
rhizome is woody with scars between successive erect stems.
Key Features
Fibrous roots on shoot (Plate 3).
Leaf sheath compressed and
forming a “V” shape on one side
(Plate 4).
Leaf tip is serrated and there
are 13-17 longitudinal leaf veins
(Plate 5).
Diagnostic Features
Leaf sheath scars do not
fully encircle vertical stem
‘open leaf scars’ (Plate
6).
Habitat
Shallow Coastal/Back Reef
Reef
Deep Coastal
Field Guide to Seagrasses of the Red Sea
17
Serrated leaf tip
Ribbon leaf
blade
Close-up
area
Smooth
rhizome
Flat “V”
shape leaf
sheath
Fibrous
root on
shoot
Leaf scars
(Plate 2) Mag. 20x
(Plate 1)
Mag. 20x
Fibrous root
on shoot
V shape leaf
sheath
Spine on
leaf tip
Close-up
area
Open leaf
scars
Serrated
leaf tip
(Plate 3)
18
(Plate 4)
(Plate 5) Mag. 2x
(Plate 6)
Halodule pinifolia
(Miki) den Hartog
Halodule pinifolia (Plate 1) is known from the southern Egyptian coast (El
Shaffai, 2011), but is probably more widespread in suitable habitat. As Halodule
pinifolia is morphologically very similar to Halodule uninervis, it has probably
been reported as the latter in many places. It is not always easy to differentiate
between the two species. Indeed Waycott, et al., (2004) reported that Halodule
pinifolia is genetically identical to Halodule uninervis.
Morphology
Leaf
The leaf blade is less than 20 cm long and 0.02-0.1 cm wide, linear and lat.
The leaf sheath is well developed and there are three longitudinal leaf veins.
Leaf margin is mostly smooth but inely serrated at the tip. The most distinctive
feature is the black central vein at the leaf tip, which splits into two at the
apex.
Stem
The stem of this species is short, erect, vertical and bearing 1-2 leaves. It is
Field Guide to Seagrasses of the Red Sea
19
often covered by dense lealets and looks like leaves develop directly from
rhizome.
Rhizome
The rhizome is thin and often covered by leaf scars.
Microscopic Leaf Anatomy
Cells are small, regular and rectangular in shape (Plate 2).
Similar Species
Halodule uninervis has three distinct points or “teeth” at the leaf tip with
the mid “tooth” not showing any splitting.
Key Features
Short erect stem often with
numerous leaf scars (Plate 3).
Very narrow leaf blade.
Bluntly rounded leaf tip with
serration (Plate 4).
Diagnostic Features
The black central leaf vein
split into two at the leaf
tip (Plate 4).
Habitat
Shallow Coastal/Back Reef
20
Reef
Deep Coastal
Leaf blade
Close-up
area
Leaf sheath
(Plate 2) Mag. 20x
Rhizome
(Plate 1)
Mag. 20x
Leaf tip serrations
Leaf scars
Split mid
vein
(Plate 3) Mag. 2x
(Plate 4)
Field Guide to Seagrasses of the Red Sea
21
Halodule uninervis
(Forsskål) Ascherson
Halodule uninervis (Plate 1) is one of the most widespread seagrass species in
the Red Sea. This species is found from the southern Red Sea to the northern
tips of the Gulfs of Suez and Aqaba (Green & Short, 2003). On the eastern
side of the Red Sea, the abundance of this species increases towards the
southern Red Sea (Price, et al., 1988). Two forms may be present; plants with
broad or narrow leaves. The occurrence of these two forms is inluenced by
environmental conditions such as water depth and turbidity, both of which
inluence light availability.
Morphology
Leaf
Leaf dimensions of this species are highly variable. The leaf blade is up to 15
cm long, but typically much shorter. The leaf width ranges from 0.05-0.5 cm,
and has a linear shape and is lat. The leaf sheath is well developed and remains
long after the blade is shed. The leaf has three longitudinal veins, the mid vein
being the most obvious and easiest to identify. The leaf margin is smooth and
the leaf tip has three distinct points (called “teeth”), one in the middle and one
on each side (see Plate 5).
22
Stem
The stems are short, erect and vertical at each node and can bear 1-4
leaves.
Rhizome
The rhizome is typically smooth.
Microscopic Leaf Anatomy
Cells are regular and rectangular in shape (Plate 2).
Similar Species
Halodule pinifolia has a rounded leaf tip with a split mid vein and numerous
faint serrations.
Key Features
Blade with three longitudinal
veins.
Vertical short erect stem at each
node (Plate 3).
Diagnostic Features
Three leaf tips with a blunt
central “tooth” (Plate 4).
Habitat
Shallow Coastal/Back Reef
Reef
Deep Coastal
Field Guide to Seagrasses of the Red Sea
23
Narrow Leaf Form
Broad Leaf Form
Leaf tip
Foraminifera
(calcareous animals
that can attach to
seagrasses)
Leaf blade
Close-up
area
Leaf sheath
Node
Rhizome
(Plate 2) Mag. 20x
Root
Leaf tip
(Plate 1)
Erect
stem
Black central
teeth (unsplit)
Two well developed
lateral Teeth
Smooth thick
rhizome
(Plate 3)
24
(Plate 4) Mag. 4x
Syringodium isoetifolium
(Ascherson) Dandy
Syringodium isoetifolium (Plate 1) is the only species with a cylindrical leaf
structure and thus is one of the easiest to identify. On the eastern coast of
the Red Sea this species increases in abundance northward (Price, et al.,
1988). Although this species is common in many areas of the Red Sea, it
appears to be absent in the Gulf of Suez (Jacobs & Dicks, 1985).
Morphology
Leaf
The leaf blade is up to 30 cm long and 0.1-0.2 cm wide. The leaf sheath
ranges from 1.5-4.0 cm in length. There are no obvious leaf veins. The leaf
margin is smooth and the leaf tip tapers off to a point (Plate 1).
Stem
This species has an erect stem at each node bearing 2-3 leaves.
Rhizome
The rhizome is smooth and has 1-3 small branched roots.
Field Guide to Seagrasses of the Red Sea
25
Microscopic Leaf Anatomy
Cells are hexagonal in shape and are closely packed (Plate 2).
Similar Species
Syringodium isoetifolium is easily distinguished from other species
because of its cylindrical shaped leaves.
Key Features
Erect stem, sometimes branched
(Plate 3).
Diagnostic Features
Leaf blade is cylindrical
and a cross-section of the
blade reveals air cavities
(Plate 4).
Habitat
Shallow Coastal/Back Reef
26
Reef
Deep Coastal
Cylindrical
leaf blade
Close-up
area
Mag. 20x
Leaf sheath
Smooth rhizome
Roots
(Plate 1)
Air cavities
Erect
stem
Hexagonal
Cells
(Plate 2) Mag. 20x
Rhizome
Roots
(Plate 3) Mag. 2x
(Plate 4) Mag. 20x
Field Guide to Seagrasses of the Red Sea
27
Thalassodendron ciliatum
(Forsskål) den Hartog
Thalassodendron ciliatum (Plate 1) is typically found only in single species
meadows and is one of the few species that can be found attached to reef.
It is widespread throughout the Red Sea. On the eastern side of the Red
Sea, the abundance of this species increases northward (Price, et al., 1988).
This species has been recorded in the Gulfs of Suez and Aqaba (Green &
Short, 2003), and has been reported from shallow to 40 m of water depth.
Morphology
Leaf
The leaf blade is up to 15 cm long and 0.5-1.5 cm wide, and linear in shape.
The leaf sheath is wide (1.5-3.0 cm), lat and often purple in color, and curved
at the base of the leaves. Leaves have between 17-27 longitudinal veins.
The margin of the leaf has irregular serration and the leaf tip is rounded, with
obvious numerous teeth.
Stem
This species has a long erect and wiry stem that can be up to 65 cm (but
usually much shorter) with numerous leaf scars along its length. The stem
bears a cluster of leaves (called crown leaves).
Rhizome
The rhizome of this species is woody and tough, up to 0.5 cm thick and
covered by scars along the length of rhizome. The roots are generally well
attached to the sealoor.
28
Microscopic Leaf Anatomy
Cells are square to angular and are placed in well-spaced rows (Plate 2).
Similar Species
Cymodocea serrulata has linear leaves. Also, the rhizome of Cymodocea
serrulata is smooth and thin without scars between the erect shoots.
Thalassia hemprichii has a shorter stem, tannin cells and has no leaf
clusters.
Key Features
Woody rhizome with scars
between successive erect stem
(Plate 3).
Long wiry erect stem with leaf
scars along its length (Plate 4).
Leaf tip is inely toothed or
notched, with 17-27 longitudinal
veins (Plate 5).
Diagnostic Features
A cluster of sickle-shaped
leaves (crown leaves) with
a wide and lat leaf sheath
(Plate 1).
Habitat
Shallow Coastal/Back Reef
Reef
Deep Coastal
Field Guide to Seagrasses of the Red Sea
29
Wiry erect stem
with leaf scars
Crown leaves
Close-up
area
Woody rhizome
with scars
(Plate 1)
(Plate 2) Mag. 20x
Wiry erect stem
with leaf scars
Woody rhizome
with scars
(Plate 3)
30
Wide lat leaf
sheath
Leaf scars on
wiry stem
(Plate 4)
Tooth of leaf
tip
Mag. 20×
Finely serrated
leaf tip
Close-up
area
(Plate 5) Mag. 2x
Field Guide to Seagrasses of the Red Sea
31
Family Hydrocharitaceae
32
Enhalus acoroides
(L.f.) Royle
Enhalus acoroides (Plate 1) is the least abundant of the seagrass species in
the Red Sea. On the eastern side of the Red Sea it is locally abundant off the
southern coast of Saudi Arabia (Price, et al., 1988) and in Yemen (Barratt,
et al., 1987). It is rare along the northwest coast of the Red Sea, with one
observation recorded by the Author in southern Egypt. It is also known from
Eritrea (Fishazion, et al., 2007) and Sudan (Somaya Kidir, pers. comm. June
2009). It has not been recorded in the Gulfs of Suez and Aqaba (Lipkin,
1977; Jacobs & Dicks, 1985).
Morphology
Leaf
The blade of the leaf is ribbon-like, and can be 200 cm long and nearly 2 cm
wide. The remnants of the leaf sheath form long black ibrous bristles. There
are up to 30 longitudinal parallel leaf veins. The leaf margins are thick and
inrolled. Young leaves have slight serrations with a rounded and smooth leaf
tip.
Stem
The leaves develop directly from the rhizome.
Rhizome
The rhizome is thick (up to 1 cm in diameter). The roots are cordlike, 0.30.5 cm thick.
Field Guide to Seagrasses of the Red Sea
33
Microscopic Leaf Anatomy
Cells are mostly brick-shaped, usually two to three times longer than they
are broad (Plate 2).
Similar Species
The leaf and rhizome of Enhalus acoroides are easily distinguished from
other species because of their unique appearance.
Key Features
The rhizome is thick and covered
with stiff long black ibrous
bristles (Plate 3).
Roots are cord-like (Plate 4).
Large plant with long ribbon like
leaves.
Diagnostic Features
Leaf margins are inrolled
(Plate 5).
Habitat
Shallow Coastal/Back Reef
34
Reef
Deep Coastal
Leaf blade
Mag. 20x
Close-up
area
(Plate 2)
Long black
bristles
Cordlike roots
Rhizome
(Plate 1)
Long black
ibrous bristles
Cord-like
root
Inrolled leaf
margins
Leaf cross
section
(Plate 3)
(Plate 4)
(Plate 5)
Field Guide to Seagrasses of the Red Sea
35
Halophila decipiens
Ostenfeld
Halophila decipiens (Plate 1) is currently known from only two locations in
the Red Sea. Jacobs and Dicks (1985) recorded it in the Gulf of Suez at 30 m
depth and the Author recorded it in 7 m and 42 m of water off the southern
Egyptian coast. The distribution of this species in the Red Sea is otherwise
unknown, but likely to be found throughout in suitable habitat.
Morphology
Leaf
The leaf blade is up to 2.5 cm long, 0.5 cm wide and paddle-shaped. It has
hairs on both side of the leaf blade. There are 6-9 unbranched cross leaf
veins. The margin of the leaf is inely serrated and the leaf tip is rounded.
Stem
The petioles are 3-15 mm long, each bearing pairs of leaves. Petioles
develop directly from the rhizome.
Rhizome
The rhizome is smooth, thin and elongated.
36
Microscopic Leaf Anatomy
Cells angular to hexagonal in shape (Plate 2).
Similar Species
Halophila ovalis and Halophila ovata have less elongated and broader leaf
blade and do not have hairs on the leaf blades.
Halophila stipulacea has a lopsided sheath structure on each leaf pair.
Key Features
Rhizome is thin (Plate 3).
Paddle shaped leaves with ine
serrations along margin but only
visible clearly with a magnifying
lens.
Long petioles arising directly
from the rhizome (Plate 3).
Diagnostic Features
Dense hairs on both
sides of leaf blade but
requires a magnifying
lens to see clearly (Plate
4). Sometimes sediment
will adhere to hairs on the
leaf blade as shown in
Plate 5.
Habitat
Shallow Coastal/Back Reef
Reef
Deep Coastal
Field Guide to Seagrasses of the Red Sea
37
(Plate 2) Mag. 20x
Sediment
caught by
leaf hairs
Leaf blade
Close-up
area
Rhizome
Petiole
Paddle shaped
leaves
Long
petioles
Rhizome
(Plate 3)
38
Source: Dr. Jent Kornelis van Dijk
(Plate 1)
Hairs on leaf blade
Mag. 10x
(Plate 4)
(Plate 5)
Halophila ovalis
(R. Brown) Hooker f.
Halophila ovalis (Plate 1) is widespread throughout the Red Sea, including
the Gulfs of Suez and Aqaba (Green & Short, 2003). In the Red Sea, Halophila
ovalis has been reported down to 23 m of water in the Gulf of Suez (Jacobs
& Dicks, 1985), but is more common in shallower waters.
Morphology
Leaf
The leaf blade is 1-4 cm long and 0.5-2.0 cm wide, and is oval shaped. The
leaf has no sheath, but two scales cover the base of the petiole. There are
10-28 branched cross veins and in some specimens there are small dark
colored dots beside the mid vein (Plate 1). The leaf margin is smooth and
there are no hairs on the leaf surface.
Stem
Petioles are 0.4-8.0 cm in length and arise directly from the rhizome. Each
petiole supports leaf pairs.
Rhizome
Rhizome is smooth, thin and light colored.
Field Guide to Seagrasses of the Red Sea
39
Microscopic Leaf Anatomy
The cells are not in clear rows but irregular in arrangement and shape. Cells
sometimes have a “jigsaw” like appearance (Plate 2).
Similar Species
Halophila ovata has a smaller leaf blade and fewer cross veins.
Halophila decipiens has hairs on the leaf blade and has a serrated leaf
margin.
Key Features
Pairs of oval shaped leaves on
petioles (Plate 3).
No hairs on leaf surface and
smooth leaf margin (Plate 4).
Diagnostic Features
Ten
to
twenty-eight
branched cross veins
ascending
at
45-60
degrees on both sides of
the mid vein (Plate 4).
Habitat
Shallow Coastal/Back Reef
40
Reef
Deep Coastal
Dark colored
dots
Close-up
area
Oval shaped
leaf blade
(Plate 2) Mag. 20x
Young
lealet
(Plate 1)
Oval shaped
leaf blade
Smooth leaf
margin
Petiole
Rhizome
Epiphytes on
leaf blade
Branched
cross veins
(Plate 3)
(Plate 4) Mag. 2x
Field Guide to Seagrasses of the Red Sea
41
Halophila ovata
Gaudichaud
Halophila ovata (Plate 1) is less common than Halophila ovalis, which is
structurally similar. Published observations of this species in the Red Sea
are from the Gulf of Suez (Jacobs & Dicks, 1985), from near Jeddah on the
Saudi Arabian coastline (Aleem, 1979) and off the Yemeni coast (Barratt, et
al., 1987). The Author has also collected this species from a range of sites
in southern Egypt. Halophila ovata has been recorded in 20 m of water in
the Gulf of Suez (Jacobs & Dicks, 1985), but it is probably more common in
shallower waters (Jones, et al., 1987).
Morphology
Leaf
The leaf blade is oval shaped (Plate 2), and ranges between 0.8-1.3 cm in
length and 0.4-0.8 cm in width. There is no leaf sheath, but two scales cover
the petiole base. There are 4-10 leaf veins, with a wide space between the
cross veins that are unbranched. The leaf margin has smooth edges with no
hairs on the leaf surface.
Stem
The petioles arise directly from the rhizome.
42
Rhizome
The rhizome is smooth, thin and light-colored.
Microscopic Leaf Anatomy
Cells not in rows. Cells irregular in arrangement or have a “jigsaw”
appearance.
Similar Species
Halophila ovalis has a more elongated leaf blade and more cross veins.
Halophila decipiens has ine hairs on the leaf surface and the leaf blade
is serrated.
Key Features
Smooth leaf margin and no hairs
on the leaf blade (Plate 3).
Oval shaped leaf blade, 0.81.3 cm long and 0.4-0.8 cm
wide (Plate 3).
Diagnostic Features
Four to ten unbranched
cross veins and wide
space between the cross
veins (Plate 3).
Habitat
Shallow Coastal/Back Reef
Reef
Deep Coastal
Field Guide to Seagrasses of the Red Sea
43
(Plate 1)
Thin smooth
rhizome
Oval shaped
leaf blade
Unbranched
cross veins
Petiole
Scales
(Plate 2)
44
Wide space
between
cross veins
(Plate 3)
Halophila stipulacea
(Forsskål) Ascherson
Halophila stipulacea (Plate 1) has been recorded from all countries bordering
the Red Sea (Green & Short, 2003), and is one of the most common species.
It is more abundant in the northern Red Sea compared with the central
and southern Red Sea (Green & Short, 2003). This species has been
recorded from shallow depths to 70 m of water (Lipkin, 1979). It entered
the Mediterranean Sea after the Suez Canal was built, and is now found in
many areas of the eastern Mediterranean as an introduced species. In the
Egyptian Red Sea, this species commonly occurs in large single-species
meadows in water depths exceeding 10 m. Specimens tend to be larger in
deeper water (Lipkin, 1979), which may be an adaptation to lower levels of
light at greater depths.
Morphology
Leaf
The leaf blade is up to 6 cm long and 0.8-1.0 cm wide, and is linear to
oblong in shape. The leaf sheath is a large transparent scale covering a
short petiole. Leaf veins consist of 10-40 branched cross veins with a clear
and obvious mid vein (Plate 1). An unusual leaf structure observed in the
Red Sea is called ‘bullose’, which is a bulging section on the leaf surface
(Waycott, et al., 2004). The leaf margin is serrated and minute hairs may be
present on one side of the leaf surface. The leaf tip is rounded, and distinctly
serrated.
Stem
Two short stems, each carrying two leaves.
Field Guide to Seagrasses of the Red Sea
45
Rhizome
The rhizome is smooth with long internodes and the rhizome is always
covered by leaf scars at the stem base.
Microscopic Leaf Anatomy
The leaf contains large cells that are angular to hexagonal in shape (Plate 2).
Similar Species
Halophila decipiens has hairs on both side of the leaf blade.
Key Features
Length of leaves is long
compared to the width and short
stems (Plate 3).
Leaf margin serrated (Plate 4).
Clear obvious mid vein with
branched cross veins (Plate 4).
Bulging sections (bullose) between
the veins on the leaves (Plate 5).
Diagnostic Features
The leaf sheath is a
large transparent scale
covering the short stem to
form a lopsided structure
on each leaf pair (Plate
6).
Habitat
Shallow Coastal/Back Reef
46
Reef
Deep Coastal
Leaf blade
Mid vein
Lopsided
leaf sheath
Close-up
area
Rhizome
Serrated
leaf tip
Root
(Plate 2) Mag. 20x
(Plate 1)
Lopsided
Leaf
leaf
blade
sheath
Leaf tip
Serrated
leaf margin
Bulging
sections
called bullose
Large
transparent leaf
sheath
Leaf
veins
Rhizome
(Plate 3)
Mid
vein
(Plate 4) Mag. 4x
(Plate 5) Mag. 2x
(Plate 6) Mag. 2x
Field Guide to Seagrasses of the Red Sea
47
Thalassia hemprichii
(Ehrenberg) Ascherson
Thalassia hemprichii (Plate 1) is a widespread species throughout the Red
Sea, including the Gulf of Aqaba, but has not been reported in the Gulf of
Suez. On the eastern side of the Red Sea, the abundance of this species
increases southward (Price, et al., 1988).
Morphology
Leaf
The blade of the leaf is up to 40 cm long, but typically much shorter, and
0.4-1.0 cm wide. The leaf blade is ribbon-like and often slightly curved with
obvious large cells grouped in red or black bars. The leaf sheath is well
developed and there are 10-17 longitudinal leaf veins (Plate 1). The margin
of the leaf is smooth except for the leaf tip, which has ine serrations and is
rounded.
Stem
The stem is short and erect, bearing 2-6 leaves.
Rhizome
The rhizome is thick and covered with triangular shaped leaf scars.
48
Microscopic Leaf Anatomy
Cell shape can range from circular to rectangular with red or black colored
cells arranged in regular bars (Plate 2).
Similar Species
Both species of Cymodocea have a smooth rhizome without scars and
lack obvious cells arranged in dark bars.
Key Features
Rhizome is thick and covered
by obvious triangular leaf scars
(Plate 3).
Ribbon-like leaves arise from
short erect stem with fully
enclosed leaf sheath (Plate 3).
Diagnostic Features
Curved leaves with clearly
visible red or black cells
arranged in bars running
along the blade (Plate 4).
Habitat
Shallow Coastal/Back Reef
Reef
Deep Coastal
Field Guide to Seagrasses of the Red Sea
49
Close-up
area
(Plate 2) Mag. 20x
(Plate 1)
Curved
leaf
blade
Curved ribbon
leaf blade
Fully
enclosed
leaf sheath
Close-up
area
Thick
roots
Triangular leaf
scars
Bars of
reddish
or dark
colored
cells
Thick rhizome
covered by leaf
scars
(Plate 3)
50
(Plate 4) Mag. 2x
Glossary
Bullose: bulb-shaped or bulging surface.
Diversity: variety, often expressed as a function of a number of species in
a sample.
Epiphyte: plants growing on the surface of other plants.
Internodes: the part of the rhizome between two nodes.
Leaf scars: the marks remaining on the rhizome or stem of a plant after a
leaf has died.
Leaf sheath: the protective cover for the young leaves, it encloses the
growing tip of the rhizome.
Leaf scale: a modiied leaf, often small and membranous.
Leeward: side protected from the wind.
Nodes: the point on a plant rhizome from which the leaves and lateral
shoots grow.
Seagrass meadow: a large expanse of seagrass plants.
Sediment: matter that settles to the bottom of a water body.
Subtidal: beneath the low watermark.
Vein: the clearly deined vascular bundle in a leaf, usually seen as slightly
darker lines forming the framework of a leaf.
Windward: side exposed to the wind.
Field Guide to Seagrasses of the Red Sea
51
52
References
Aleem, A.A. (1979). ‘A contribution to the study of seagrasses along the Red
Sea coast of Saudi Arabia’. Aquatic Botany 7: 71-78.
Barratt, L., Dawson-Shepherd, A., Ormond, R. and McDowell, R. (1987).
Yemen Arab Republic Marine Conservation Survey II. Preliminary coastal
zone management recommendations for the Yemen Arab Republic. IUCN,
Gland, Switzerland and PERSGA, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
den Hartog, C. (1970). The Seagrasses of the World. North-Holland Publ.
Co., Amsterdam, pp. 275.
El Shaffai, A. (2011). ‘Studies on the Seagrass Ecosystems in Wadi El Gemal
National Park’, Red Sea. MSc. Thesis, Suez Canal University, Ismailia.
Fishazion, D., Habtemariam, W. and Hiabu, Y. (2007). ‘Distribution and
Abundance of Seagrass in Central and Southern Eritrean Red Sea’. ECMIB
Unpublished Technical Report, Ministry of Fisheries, Massawa, Eritrea,
December 2007.
Green, E.P., and Short, F.T. (2003). World Atlas of Seagrasses. Published
in association with UNEP-WCMC by the University of California Press,
California.
Gullstrom, M., de la Torre Castro, M., Mats Bjork, S.O., Dahlberg, M.,
Kautsky, N., Ronnback, 0. and Ohman, M. (2002). ‘Seagrass ecosystems in
the western Indian Ocean’. Ambio 31:588-596.
Jacobs, R.P.W.M. and Dicks, B. (1985). ‘Seagrasses in the Zeit Bay area and
at Ras Gharib (Egyptian Red Sea Coast)’. Aquatic Botany 23:137-147.
Jones, D.A., Ghamrawy, M. and Wahbeh, M. I. (1987). ‘Littoral and shallow
subtidal environments’. In: A. Edwards (ed.) Key Environments: The Red
Sea, pp. 169-193. Pergamon Press, Oxford.
Lanyon, J.M. (1986). Guide to the identiication of seagrasses in the Great
Barrier Reef Region. Townsville: Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority.
Field Guide to Seagrasses of the Red Sea
53
Lipkin, Y. (1977). ‘Seagrass vegetation of Sinai and Israel’. In, C. P. McRoy
and C. Helfferich, eds. Seagrass Ecosystems: A Scientiic Perspective, pp.
263-293. Marcel Dekker Inc., New York.
Lipkin, Y. (1979). ‘Quantitative aspects of seagrass communities, particularly
those dominated by Halophila stipulacea, in Sinai (northern Red Sea)’.
Aquatic Botany 7: 119-128.
Lipkin, Y. and Zakai, D. (2003). ‘The eastern Mediterranean and Red Sea’.
In: Green, E.P., Short, F.T., (eds.) World Atlas of Seagrasses. Published
in Association with UNEP-WCMC by the University of California Press,
California, pp. 67-73.
Price, A.R.G., Crossland, C.J., Dawson Shepherd, A.R., McDowall, R.J.,
Medley, P.A.H., Stafford Smith, M. G., Ormond, R. F., and Wrathall, T.J.
(1988) ‘Aspects of seagrass ecology along the eastern Red Sea coast’.
Botanica Marina 31:83-92.
Short, F. T. and Coles, R.G. eds. (2001). Global Seagrass Research Methods.
Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam. 473 pp.
Waycott, M., McMahon, K., Mellors, J., Calladine, A. and Kleine, D. (2004),
A Guide to Tropical Seagrasses of the Indo-West Paciic, James Cook
University, Townsville, 72pp.
54
Contributors
Amgad El Shaffai
is an environmental scientist who specializes in
seagrass research in the Red Sea and Arabian Gulf.
His interest in seagrass began with his master degree,
in which he studied seasonal change and spatial
distribution of seagrasses in Wadi El Gemal National
Park, Egypt.
Dr. Anthony Rouphael
is a marine ecologist with the Marine Biodiversity and Conservation Science
Group and is based in Australia. Dr. Rouphael works extensively in Western
Australia and the Red Sea.
Dr. Ameer Abdulla
is a marine conservation ecologist and founder of the Marine Biodiversity and
Conservation Science Group irst initiated under the IUCN Global Marine and
Polar Program. Dr. Abdulla works in the Red Sea, Mediterranean, Arabian Gulf,
Indian Ocean, and Coral Sea.
Field Guide to Seagrasses of the Red Sea
55
About the Guide
his guide answers many questions about seagrass identiication, habitats, distribution and
diversity in the Red Sea. It
provides a useful resource for
students, biologists, managers
of marine resources and tourists who share an interest for
these marine lowering plants.
his guide contains clear ield
photographs of the distinctive features of each species to
facilitate accurate identiication for beginners and experts
alike.
56