Alja Lah
Title: How to make friends and attain self-realization?
Date of submission: 3.9.2015
Due date: 4.9.2015 (with extension)
Module: Existential theory and practice module
Term: Winter 2015
Word count: 2212
NSPC Existential theory and practice module, April 2015
Existential theory Essay
Alja Lah
How
to
make
friends
and
attain
self-‐realization?
Organizing
and
controlling
have
become
an
obsession
in
the
present
western
culture.
Arranging
into
a
structured
and
controllable
whole
every
aspect
of
our
lives:
our
profession,
income,
worldview,
identity,
time,
vacation,
diet,
learning,
teaching,
making
friends
and
making
love…
Science,
a
systematically
organized
body
of
knowledge,
is
what
we
all
believe
in,
without
doubt.
There
is
such
a
strong
belief
in
the
idea
that
organization
and
control
will
bring
us
happiness,
to
the
point
that
I
am
almost
tempted
to
call
it
a
new
religion.
A
story
comes
to
mind,
of
God
and
Satan
walking
down
the
street
together
when
they
see
a
brilliant
shiny
object,
God
says
“Oh
look
it
is
truth”
and
Satan
replies
“Oh
yes,
here
give
it
to
me
I
will
organize
it”.
Obviously
sciences,
organization
of
knowledge
and
society,
as
well
as
religion,
have
all
brought
many
good
and
beneficial
things.
Nevertheless
blind
repetition,
without
self-‐enquiry,
leads
into
dogmatic
methods.
Spiritual,
religious
and
even
psychotherapeutic
practices
are
always
in
danger
of
becoming
a
dogmatic
method
leading
towards
an
organized
picture
of
a
goal
that
we
have
thought
up
in
our
minds.
There
is
not
much
space
left
for
anything
else
if
we
already
know
where
we
want
to
go
and
how
we
are
getting
there.
No
space
for
truth,
mystery
or
surprise.
Genuine
human
relation
is
where,
I
believe,
still
lies
the
possibility
of
the
surprise
element,
the
mystery
of
life
that
cannot
be
predicted
or
controlled.
In
line
with
everything
I
just
stated,
the
present
essay
is
a
portrayal
of
an
idea,
instead
of
organization
of
thoughts
into
another
theory
that
wants
to
replace
reality.
Genuine
relation
To
describe
what
I
mean
as
genuine
relation
I
will
take
a
brave
plunge
and
share
one
of
my
intimate
experiences
of
it:
I
am
in
the
crowd
at
a
concert.
The
music
is
so
beautiful
it
brings
tears
to
my
eyes.
With
my
whole
being
I
feel
that
everything
already
is,
right
there
and
then.
All
at
once
existing
just
right.
At
the
same
time
I
am
aware
no
2
NSPC Existential theory and practice module, April 2015
Existential theory Essay
Alja Lah
one
else
is
sharing
this
feeling.
I
am
alone
in
the
crowd.
Certain
sadness
washes
over
me.
That
is
when
a
person
suddenly
appears,
leans
towards
me
and
says:
I
feel
like
you
feel.
Our
eyes
meet
in
the
knowing
how
the
other
feels
and
relaxing
in
our
feeling
together
and
yet
standing
in
our
own
being.
When
the
concert
finishes
we
embrace
and
each
go
our
own
way.
In
Buber’s
ideology
this
would
be
called
an
I-‐Thou
meeting
that
happens
when
two
stand
in
relation
in
a
manifest
presence,
not
trying
to
experience
it,
explain
it,
use
it
or
conceptualize
it.
Buber’s
poetic
language
(2002)
best
captures
a
moment
like
this:
Only
when
he
who
himself
turns
to
the
other
human
being
and
opens
himself
to
him
receives
the
world
in
him.
Only
the
being
whose
otherness,
accepted
by
my
being,
lives
and
faces
me
in
the
whole
compression
of
existence,
brings
the
radiance
of
eternity
to
me.
Only
when
two
say
to
one
another
with
all
that
they
are,
‘It
is
Thou’,
is
the
indwelling
of
the
Present
Being
between
them
(p.
35).
The
I-‐Thou
relation
cannot
be
found
by
seeking,
it
is
an
act
of
a
whole
being,
when
will
and
grace
are
joined
(Buber,
2004).
In
my
above
described
experience
there
was
grace
in
surrendering
to
the
world,
there
was
also
a
clear
awareness
of
the
I
being
separate
to,
what
Heidegger
calls,
‘one’
(impersonal,
nameless,
faceless
crowd)
and
finally
there
was
will
to
reach
out
to
Thou.
Buber
(2002)
exclaims,
“A
man
is
truly
saved
from
the
‘one’
not
by
separation
but
only
by
being
bound
up
in
genuine
communion”
(p.
210).
Attempts
to
replace
reality
As
a
juxtaposing
example
to
this
one
I
can
remember
being
a
young
solitary
girl
searching
for
some
kind
of
connection
that
would
make
my
life
meaningful
and
intending
to
help
myself
with
a
book
titled
“How
to
win
friends
and
influence
3
NSPC Existential theory and practice module, April 2015
Existential theory Essay
Alja Lah
people”.
Looking
back
on
it
now,
it
seems
quite
paradoxical
how
I
was
intuitively
searching
in
the
right
direction
but
with
an
entirely
wrong
approach.
Approaching
people
by
following
advice
from
a
book
meant
hiding
myself
behind
a
method
that
was
supposed
to
bring
me
a
desired
outcome.
In
Buber’s
terms
I
was
making
an
I-‐It
relation;
objectifying,
using,
experiencing
people
as
an
It.
At
the
same
time
I
myself
was
coming
from
a
purely
cognitive
and
fleeting
way
of
being
an
I.
Not
ready
to
disclose
who
I
am
and
not
willing
to
truly
see
others.
This
is
the
standard
way
we
interact
with
the
world.
There
is
nothing
wrong
with
it,
apart
from
it
leading
astray
from
connecting
to
oneself
or
others.
This
way
we
only
distance
ourselves
from
the
world
and
the
possibility
of
knowing
it,
as
we
get
carried
away
from
experiencing
it
to
thinking
about
it
and
wanting
it
to
be
something
else
than
what
it
is.
Wouldn't
it
be
dull
if
at
the
end
of
the
journey
we
always
got
exactly
what
we
imagined
at
the
beginning?
I
believe
how
we
walk
every
step
of
the
way
is
more
important
than
where
we
are
headed.
The
way
is
not
just
the
means
to
a
goal,
rather
the
way
is
the
goal.
By
letting
a
method
be
our
way,
we
succumb
the
mystery
of
our
life
to
a
false
security
of
an
illusory
world
waiting
for
us
in
the
Never-‐never
land.
In
the
words
of
Buber
(2002)
“Revelation
will
tolerate
no
perfect
tense,
but
man
with
the
arts
of
his
craze
for
security
props
it
up
to
perfectness”
(p.
21).
It
is
not
possible
to
live
in
the
bare
present,
but
it
is
possible
to
live
only
in
past
and
future,
where
the
insecurity
of
the
unpredictable
present
is
controlled.
Sometimes
it
helps
having
a
map
to
find
our
way
around,
but
that
is
only
until
we
keep
in
mind
that
the
map
is
not
a
replacement
of
the
world,
for
“a
world
that
is
ordered
is
not
the
world-‐order”
(Buber,
2004,
p.
31).
Nonetheless
this
is
usually
the
pitfall
we
all
trip
into.
Mistaking
religion
for
our
own
feeling
of
faith,
psychotherapy
for
genuine
relation,
morality
for
compassion,
a
polite
exchange
of
words
for
a
sincere
conversation,
a
movie
for
a
life,
making
money
for
doing
a
good
job,
perfectionism
for
the
best
we
can
do.
Blindly
following
any
kind
of
method,
plan
or
a
goal
is
an
“attempt
to
replace
reality”
(Buber,
2004,
p.
119).
“And
in
all
the
seriousness
of
truth,
hear
this:
without
It
man
cannot
live.
But
he
who
lives
with
It
alone
is
not
a
man”.
(Buber,
2004,
p.
34)
4
NSPC Existential theory and practice module, April 2015
Existential theory Essay
Alja Lah
Isolation
Buber’s
view
on
self-‐realization
and
isolation
divides
him
from
most
of
the
popular
culture,
spiritualism,
psychotherapies
and
so
forth.
For
him
self-‐
realization
is
a
by-‐product
rather
than
the
goal.
The
goal
is
“completing
distance
by
relation,
and
relation
here
means
mutual
confirmation,
co-‐operation,
and
genuine
dialogue”
(Buber,
1998,
p.
11).
Buber
does
not
write
about
I-‐Thou
relation
as
merely
another
dimension
of
relational
existence,
along
with
personal,
physical
and
spiritual,
like
other
authors
have
(for
example:
Binswanger,
1946;
Deurzen-‐Smith,
1984)
but
as
one
of
the
two
essential
ways
of
being-‐in-‐the-‐world,
the
only
one
worth
living,
but
also
the
one
man
can
(sadly)
live
without.
According
to
Buber
(2004)
there
are
two
kinds
of
solitude
depending
on
what
we
turn
away
from.
One
may
seek
solitude
in
order
to
free
oneself
from
experiencing
and
using
of
things
and
others,
as
a
purification
to
be
able
to
step
from
I-‐It
into
I-‐Thou
relations.
This
is
what
I
believe
isolation
into
meditation
should
be:
a
preparation
to
meet
others
and
to
hold
our
ground
when
we
meet
them.
Never
forgetting
that
it
is
merely
a
method
and
not
a
self-‐righteous
goal.
The
other
kind
of
solitude
means
absence
of
relation,
isolation
from
the
world,
where
a
man
conducts
“a
dialogue
with
himself
–
not
in
order
to
test
and
master
himself
for
that
which
awaits
him
but
in
the
enjoyment
of
the
confirmation
of
his
soul
–
then
we
have
the
real
fall
of
the
spirit
into
spirituality”
(p.
104).
It
is
concern
with
oneself
that
keeps
one
away
from
mystery
of
meeting
the
other.
A
man
can
never
be
a
surprise
to
himself
(Buber,
1998).
Finding
that
special
connection
that
most
of
us
yearn
for,
which
Buber
calls
God,
cannot
be
reached
by
isolation.
In
his
view
a
man
turning
aside
from
the
course
of
his
life
in
order
to
seek
God
is
“foolish
and
hopeless”,
because
“even
though
he
won
all
the
wisdom
of
solitude
and
all
the
power
of
concentrated
being
he
would
miss
God”
(Buber,
2004,
p.
80).
For
example
in
Buddhism
there
are
stories
of
monks
that
talked
to
the
Buddha
or
just
met
him
and
attained
enlightenment
merely
through
that
5
NSPC Existential theory and practice module, April 2015
Existential theory Essay
Alja Lah
genuine
interpersonal
encounter
that
managed
to
do
what
years
and
years
of
meditation,
effort
and
sitting
in
solitude
could
not.
Previously
I
described
the
feeling
of
sadness
I
felt
at
the
concert,
which
I
think
is
very
common
in
experiences
of
“everything
and
everyone
being
connected
or
being
one”.
With
perceiving
that
“everything
is
one”,
there
often
comes
the
realization
that
nobody
else
perceives
it.
Paradoxically
it
turns
out
to
be
a
very
lonely
feeling.
But
genuine
meeting
brings
this
same
feeling
of
connection
with
an
addition
of
mutuality.
Another
universe
is
looking
back
at
you
from
the
other
person’s
eyes,
saying
“I
feel
what
you
feel”.
Genuine
saying
of
Thou
to
the
other
essentially
means
“the
affirmation
of
the
primally
deep
otherness
of
the
other,
…
which
is
accepted
and
loved
by
me”
(Buber,
1998,
p.
86).
This
is
exactly
what
gets
devalued
and
destroyed
in
the
ancient
religions
and
modern
spiritualism
through
teachings
of
identity
like
“you
are
me”
or
“all
is
one”.
Buber
(1998)
sees
it
as
“annihilation
of
the
human
person,
…
for
the
person
is
through
and
through
nothing
but
uniqueness
and
thus
essentially
other
than
all
that
is
over
against
it”
(p.
86).
When
one
says
to
the
other
“I
accept
you
as
you
are”
that
is
genuine
human
meeting
and
here
first
is
“uncurtailed
existence”
(Buber,
1998,
p.
86).
Meeting
unto
self-‐realization
Buber
sees
self-‐realization
as
becoming
an
authentic
self,
essentially
through
mutual
confirmation.
For
a
genuine
meeting
to
enfold
Buber
(1998)
writes
about
three
necessities:
not
to
give
into
seeming,
not
to
impose
oneself
on
the
other
and
making
the
other
present
in
one’s
personal
being.
This
is
where
I
see
the
overlap
of
genuine
meeting
and
psychotherapy,
leading
to
self-‐realization.
I
speak
only
of
certain
kinds
of
phenomenologically
based
psychotherapies
that
are
non-‐directive
and
include
development
of
a
sincere
relation.
The
psychotherapist
knows
the
actualizing
forces
that
have
shaped
and
still
shape
him
and
trusts
their
effect
in
the
struggle
against
the
counterforces.
Existential
communication
between
one
who
is
an
“actual
being”
and
the
other
who
is
in
a
“process
of
becoming”
turns
into
a
genuine
dialogue
that
“opens
out”
potentiality
6
NSPC Existential theory and practice module, April 2015
Existential theory Essay
Alja Lah
(Buber,
1998,
p.
72).
That
is
why
I
believe
the
therapist
must
essentially
trust
in
the
effect
of
the
genuine
meeting,
which
gives
him
the
strength
to
persevere
in
the
unknown,
without
a
method
or
a
goal,
and
thus
is
able
to
leave
the
client
really
to
himself
and
see
where
he
is
being
drawn.
Existential
healing
takes
place
when
there
is
trust
of
one
whole
person
to
another
whole
person
as
they
honestly
acknowledge
to
each
other
that
they
are
both
reeling
in
chaos
(Buber,
1957).
This
does
not
mean
healing
of
only
a
certain
part
of
the
client
as
through
insight
or
analysis,
rather
this
is
healing
of
the
client’s
being-‐in-‐the-‐world.
David
Smail
(2015)
suspected
that
psychotherapy
only
really
works
if
the
therapist
and
the
client
become
true
friends.
I
acknowledge
his
point
but
would
reiterate
that
for
a
successful
therapy
to
take
place
there
has
to
be
an
I-‐Thou
relation
between
the
therapist
and
the
client
(at
least
on
certain
occasions).
Thus
in
the
relation
between
them
exists
an
opening
that
allows
for
something
to
spring
out
that
has
not
been
there
previously,
neither
in
between
nor
in
any
of
the
two.
It
springs
out
of
the
genuine
meeting.
Play
in
between
Buber
(2004)
claimed
there
is
no
method
or
prescription
that
can
lead
us
to
the
meeting,
and
no
cure
to
forget
about
it,
“as
only
acceptance
of
the
Presence
is
necessary”
and
“nothing
can
any
longer
be
meaningless”,
the
meaning
is
not
of
a
world
“yonder”
but
of
this
world
of
ours,
that
seeks
to
be
lived,
and
nothing
but
lived,
continually,
ever
anew
in
this
life
and
in
relation
with
this
world
“in
the
totality
of
its
antinomy”
(p.
95,
p.
110).
Once
we
know
true
freedom
of
free
giving
between
I
and
Thou
we
must
practice
directness-‐even
if
we
are
the
only
being
on
earth
who
does
it
(Buber,
1998,
p.
69).
The
genuine
meeting
is
a
mystery
that
leaves
us
with
more
questions
than
solutions
to
the
riddle
of
life
of
how
I
can
exist
ever
changing
between
It
and
Thou.
Maybe
the
answer
is
to
fully
enter
into
the
never-‐ending
play
between
these
to
spheres
of
being
and
opening
up
to
the
ever-‐surprising
present?
7
NSPC Existential theory and practice module, April 2015
Existential theory Essay
Alja Lah
Moment
of
genuine
meeting
comes
as
a
falling
star,
abruptly,
tearing
out
of
the
surrounding
world
and
cutting
deep
into
being,
we
become
aware
of
it
only
after
it
is
gone
and
leaves
a
scar
on
our
iris,
changed
forever.
For
that
moment
we
were
present
being
sharing
a
magical
moment
with
the
universe.
And
even
with
only
one
in
a
million
chance
to
catch
it
again,
this
does
not
hinder
me
to
look
into
the
sky
with
eyes
presently
open.
References
Binswanger,
L.
(1946).
‘The
existential
analysis
school
of
thought’,
in
R.
May,
E.
Angel
and
H.F.
Ellenberger
(eds),
Existence.
New
York:
Basic
Books.
Buber,
M.
(1957).
Pointing
the
Way.
New
York:
Harper
&
Brothers.
Buber,
M.
(1998).
The
Knowledge
of
Man:
Selected
essays.
New
York:
Prometheus
Books.
Buber,
M.
(2002).
Between
Man
and
Man.
London:
Routledge.
Buber,
M.
(2004).
I
and
Thou.
London:
Continuum.
Deurzen-‐Smith,
E.
van
(1984).
‘Existential
psychotherapy’,
in
W.
Dryden
(ed.),
Individual
Therapy
in
Britain.
London:
Harper
&
Row.
Smail,
D.
(2015).
Taking
Care
-‐
An
Alternative
to
Therapy.
London:
Karnac
Books.
8