Volume 54, Number 3
Summer 2020
Beverley Diamond to Deliver 2020 Charles Seeger Lecture
C. Kati Szego, Memorial University of Newfoundland
The 2020 Charles Seeger Lecture will be delivered by
Beverley Diamond, Professor Emerita of Ethnomusicology
at Memorial University of Newfoundland. Prior to taking
up the first Tier 1 Canada Research Chair in Ethnomusicology at Memorial in 2002,
Bev taught at York University
(Toronto, 1988–2001), Queen’s
University (Kingston, 1975–88),
and McGill University (Montreal, 1973–75). Bev completed
all her degrees, in musicology
and ethnomusicology, at the
University of Toronto.
music studies by offering new approaches to historiography, shifting musical emphases, and illuminating the
power that academics wield through their assumptive and
interpretive choices.
Features
Reports
News
Our Back Pages
President’s Column
2020 Charles Seeger Lecturer:
Beverley Diamond
2020 Virtual Annual Meeting
ATM China Project
Notes from the Field
Methods for Music Ethnography
in and of Crisis
SEM News
Member News
Institutional News
Conference Calendar
Advertisements
SEM Publications
Internet Resources
In 2000, Bev co-edited Music
& Gender (U Illinois P) with
Pirkko Moisala. While theirs
was not the first volume on that
topic in our field (Koskoff 1987;
Herndon & Ziegler 1990), it
broke new ground. Music &
Gender was remarkable both
for its authors’ use of feminist
A Canadian, most of Bev
theory and for its recognition of
Diamond’s research has taken
ethnocentrism and class bias in
place within the country’s borfeminist theory. The productive
ders. Offering nuanced analytension of that interstitial space
ses in a non-polemical voice,
characterizes a great deal of
much of her writing addresses
Bev’s work. As she wrote in her
Photo courtesy of Beverly Diamond.
the creative moves of musicians—some
own article in that collection, “feminist
who call themselves Canadian and many who don’t—that
scholars should not debate as much as relate the esspeak to the myriad conditions of colonialism, globalizasentialist to the constructionist, acknowledging both the
tion, and patriarchy. Each of her multitudinous articles, co- hegemonic struggle and strategic uses of the former while
edited volumes, and books address one or more topical
attempting to validate the latter” (132).
areas: gender; technological production and mediation;
expressions of Indigenous modernity in Inuit, First NaFirst steps toward establishing socially responsible parttions, Métis, Australian Aboriginal, and Sámi communities; nerships with First Peoples and the scholarly community
Indigenous intellectual property; and Canadian settler
were taken with Bev’s sprawling SPINC (Sound Producing
musics.
Instruments in Native Communities) project, begun in the
late 1980s. As Bev recalls, “I formed the SPINC group…
A few examples help to tell some of her story.
because I really felt I needed people to talk to about... my
struggle to work ethically in First Nations contexts.” She
In the 1980s and early 90s, Bev was asking incisive ques- invited two former students to form a research team, the
tions about the biases and values that framed accounts of published outcome of which was Visions of Sound (Wilfrid
Canada’s musical history, including those that advanced
Laurier UP and U Chicago P 1994). Visions of Sound set
an uncritical, romantic discourse about Canadian multicul- the stage for a “new organology”; it was equally ventureturalism. Gathering scholarship across the musicologies
some in its experiments with graphic representation,
and humanities, Canadian Music: Issues of Hegemony
reflexivity, and dialogism—between the investigators and
and Identity (Canadian Scholars’ P, 1994)—her co-edited
their First Nations consultants and between co-investigavolume with Robert Witmer—helped reset Canadian
tors. Visually complex and quirky,
[continued on p.6]
The Society for Ethnomusicology, SEM Newsletter
James Cowdery, Editor, SEM Newsletter
RILM, CUNY Graduate Center
365 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10016
semnewslettereditor@gmail.com
SEM Membership
The object of the Society for Ethnomusicology is the advancement of research and study in the field of ethnomusicology, for which purpose all interested persons, regardless of race, ethnicity, religion, gender, sexual orientation,
or physical ability are encouraged to become members.
Its aims include serving the membership and Society at
large through the dissemination of knowledge concerning
the music of the world’s peoples. The Society, incorporated in the United States, has an international membership.
SEM Newsletter is a vehicle for the exchange of ideas,
news, and information among the Society’s members.
Readers’ contributions are welcome and should be sent to
the editor.
The Society for Ethnomusicology publishes the SEM
Newsletter four times annually in January, April, July, and
September, and distributes issues free to members of the
Society.
Members receive free copies of the journal and the
newsletter and have the right to vote and participate in the
activities of the Society.
_______________
Back issues, 1981 to present [volumes 14-18 (19811984), 3 times a year; vols. 19-32 (1985-1998), 4 times a
year] are available and may be ordered at $2 each. Add
$2.50/order for postage.
Student (full-time only) (one year) ................................$40
Individual (one year)
• Income $25,000 or less ........................................... $60
• Income $25,000-$40,000 ......................................... $75
• Income $40,000-$60,000 ......................................... $85
• Income $60,000-$90,000 ....................................... $110
• Income $90,000 and above .................................. $140
Address changes, orders for back issues of the SEM
Newsletter, and all other non-editorial inquiries should be
sent to the Business Office, Society for Ethnomusicology,
Indiana University, 800 East 3rd Street, Bloomington, IN,
47405. sem@indiana.edu.
Spouse/Partner Individual (one year) ...........................$35
Life membership .......................................................$2000
Spouse/Partner Life ................................................. $2200
Sponsored (one year, including postage) ..................... $50
Overseas postage (one year) .......................................$16
For institutional memberships, please visit the University
of Illinois Press website.
Society for Ethnomusicology
Board of Directors
Timothy J. Cooley (President)
University of California, Santa Barbara
Guidelines for Contributors
Email articles and shorter entries for consideration to the
SEM Newsletter Editor.
Copy deadlines:
Winter Issue (15 Dec.)
Summer Issue (15 June)
Spring Issue (15 Mar.)
Fall Issue (1 Sep.)
Gregory Barz (Past-President)
Boston University
Tes Slominski (Secretary)
Independent Scholar, Charlottesville, VA
Noriko Manabe (Treasurer)
Temple University
Advertising Rates
The Newsletter accepts digital files (e.g., jpg) for advertising.
Alejandro L. Madrid (First Vice President)
Cornell University
Full page: $200
2/3 page: $145
1/2 page: $110
Lei Ouyang Bryant (Second Vice President)
Swarthmore College
1/3 page: $60
1/6 page: $40
Ethnomusicology: Back Issues
Sarah Morelli (Member-at-Large, Prizes)
University of Denver
Ethnomusicology, the Society’s journal (ISSN 0036-1291),
is currently published three times a year. Back issues
are available through the SEM Business Office, Indiana
University, 800 East 3rd Street, Bloomington, IN, 474053657; 812-855-6672; sem@indiana.edu.§
Jean Ngoya Kidula (Member-at-Large, Groups & Professional Development)
University of Georgia§
2
Unprecedented and Meaningful Change
Tim Cooley, SEM President
SEM must change. Now is the time. There are no quick
fixes. The process will be painful, yet the social, moral,
and scholarly costs of not changing are too great. SEM
cannot claim to be an antiracist organization, and we have
not yet come to terms with the colonial
and imperial legacies that still shape
core activities of our scholarly society as
an institution. SEM as an institution and
I as its current President have ignored,
dismissed, suppressed, and harmed
many of our members with racist acts,
the reinscriptions of hegemonic power,
and the active and complicit protection of the status quo and thus white
supremacy. I apologize on behalf of
myself and SEM. I must do better. We
must do better. I will start by thanking all
of you who have privately and publicly
come forward to point out the many
ways that white privilege continues to
be maintained within SEM. I am especially grateful to our Black, Indigenous, and People of
Color members who have taken the time to advise me and
the Board during this time of acute pain and anger. I am
listening and we must listen.
While too often blind and deaf to the racism that supports
my privilege, I cannot remain silent and complicit. I am listening. One repeated message of hope I have heard from
Tammy Kernodle, President of the Society of American
Music, is that crises prepare our societies for change that otherwise would be
much more difficult to achieve. Crises
disrupt the status quo and therein lies
opportunity. Three global crises present
us with unprecedented opportunities
for systemic changes, including for our
scholarly societies. The climate crisis
demands that we reimagine how we
use and share resources across the
board, including the carbon footprints
of our research, teaching, advocating,
and conferencing practices. But how to
address the asymmetrical impact of the
climate crisis on the poorest and most
vulnerable individuals and communities around the world and in our towns?
The coronavirus pandemic forced us to make immediate
changes in how we go about our activities as ethnomusicologists while our members quickly became adept at virtual researching, teaching, and learning while sheltering at
home—or were forced to suspend scholarly activity while
we recovered from the virus or helped family and loved
ones fight for their lives. Yet here too the pain was and is
most acutely felt by communities oppressed by legacies
of white privilege, colonialism, imperialism, and capitalism. Then the murder of George Floyd, a Black man, by
a white police officer returned the attention of the world
to the Black Lives Matter movement and to centuries of
white supremacy gained and retained by violence toward
Black, Indigenous, and People of Color.
But am I hearing? In a hasty response to Dr. Danielle
Brown’s “An Open Letter on Racism in Music Studies,
Especially EthnoCovimusicology and Music Education”
posted to SEM-L on 12 June 2020, I committed to using
the position of power and privilege of the SEM Presidency to address the concerns that Dr. Brown brought
forward. But then I overstepped when I made the aspirational claim that I believed she would find SEM a different
place should she return to us, a phrase that many read
as dismissive. The feedback was immediate, from many
sources, and well deserved. I am humbled. I acknowledge that I do not know what it feels like to be silenced,
dismissed, ignored, profiled, harmed because of my race.
I acknowledge that my employment, discipline, and even
position on the Board of SEM all affirm the legacy of
colonialist and imperialists enterprises. I embody privilege.
Who am I to presume that I know—really know—anything
about the subtle insults, erasures, humiliations that Black
and other SEM members experience over and over again
in life, including when engaging SEM (see long-standing
SEM member and current College Music Society President Eileen M. Hayes’s message to CMS). I apologize for
the anger and hurt I caused by my insensitive statement.
I recommit to listening to our membership. I am listening and concede that SEM is not changing as fast or as
effectively as is necessary. Yet we must change for many
reasons but most of all because it is the right thing to do.
And it is time.
Are we listening? Is SEM finally ready to do what should
have been done decades centuries ago? If not today,
when? For example, I have cited two current Presidents
of sibling music societies in this column, both of whom are
Black women. What are the structural conditions within
SEM that have prevented any Black member from writing
this column—from serving as SEM’s President? While we
should have taken decisive steps to end systemic structural racism, inequality, and white supremacy within our
scholarly society long ago, do we have the will to do so
now? Can we turn this confluence of unprecedented challenges to the world order into opportunities for meaningful
change? We must. And I, the Board, and SEM need your
help.
Again, SEM must change. Change will be a process,
and that process will be challenging. I am committed to
change, as is the SEM Board. But the white privilege is
[continued on next page]
3
SEM 2020 Virtual Annual Meeting
During the past spring, SEM closely monitored the COVID-19 pandemic and its potential impact on plans to hold
our 2020 Annual Meeting in Ottawa on October 22–25.
Given continuing Coronavirus infections, social distancing directives, and travel disruptions, we determined in
June that it would unfortunately not be feasible to hold this
meeting onsite in Ottawa. Thus, we will hold the 2020 Annual Meeting on October 22–31 in a virtual format, with a
pre-conference symposium on October 21. Technical support will be provided by Indiana University Bloomington.
the SEM 2020 Virtual Annual Meeting over the next several weeks. Registration at discounted rates is now open.
SEM thanks the 2020 Local Arrangements Committee for
all of its work on the onsite meeting in Ottawa. The preconference symposium, “Musical Activism and Agency:
Contestations and Confluences,” will be held in a virtual
format, in conjunction with the main conference. Meanwhile, we have rescheduled an SEM onsite annual meeting in Ottawa for October 19–22, 2023. We also thank the
2020 Program Committee for its work in assembling an
outstanding program for this year’s meeting and for its assistance with the transition to a virtual format.
We realize that many SEM members will deeply miss the
opportunities for face-to-face interaction afforded by an
onsite meeting. However, our virtual conference software
platform is designed to simulate as many aspects of an
onsite conference as possible. This platform will include
pre-recorded videos for playback, live program sessions
via video-conferencing, various types of virtual interaction
among individual attendees, and a virtual book exhibits
area. We are also considering options for alternative format sessions. We will disseminate more information about
SEM believes that its 2020 Virtual Annual Meeting will
offer an exciting opportunity for exploring new forms of
communication within the Society and for addressing ongoing concerns with travel costs, inclusion, and the global
climate impact of in-person conferences. We look forward
to seeing you at our virtual conference in October!
Unprecedented and Meaningful Change [continued from previous page]
deeply rooted, and our time on the Board is short. Will
you help the Board, Council, Committees, Sections, and
Special Interests Groups get started? Will you hold future
Boards accountable to continuing the process? Can we
collectively agree to avoid the often petty distractions from
doing what we know must be done? In my communications with SEM members who are from underrepresented
communities, one repeated demand is for a statement
about what the leadership is doing to move SEM toward
becoming an anti-racist organization; toward becoming
equitable and inclusive for all; away from systemic white
privilege. In response, I offer below a list of actions the
Board is taking to these ends:
-Engaged the Gertrude Robinson Network, Diversity Action Committee (DAC), and individual stakeholders to
listen, seek advice, and to learn.
- Appointed individuals from underrepresented groups
on both the Board Nominating Committee and Council
Nominating Committee.
- Appointed Mellonee V. Burnim as the new chair of the
Diversity Action Committee, and added new members
specifically to focus on SEM’s collective engagement
with or Black, Indigenous, and People of Color members.
- Actively recruited People of Color to sit on 2020 prize
committees, which have the responsibility for distributing research and travel funds, prizes, and honors to our
membership.
- Issued to the chairs of all 2020 prize committees a set
of best-practices steps intended to help committees
reduce the impact of implicit biases in their decisions.
4
- The Program Committee and Local Arrangement Committee for our 2021 annual meetings are both chaired by
Black ethnomusicologists and contain additional members who have ties to Historically Black Colleges and
Universities (HBCUs) with whom SEM is committed to
engaging at our 2021 annual meeting in Atlanta.
- The Task Force on Institutional Equity and Inclusion has
been formed and charged with (1) identifying language
concerning diversity, equity, and inclusion within or
absent from the various documents that govern the official actions of SEM, and (2) defining goals for SEM for
achieving institutional equity and inclusion.
- Expanded SEM’s 21st Century Fellowship from one
award of $5000, to two awards of $7500 each, one of
which prioritizes students from underrepresented communities.
- Moved to offer free admission for all undergraduates and
empowered the Business Office to work with the Local
Arrangements Committee and the Program Committee
to determine the number of free or reduced rate registrations for local community members and/or musicians
from elsewhere who appear on the Annual Meeting
program. The Board hopes that this will facilitate the
accessibility and inclusiveness of our meetings, though
this will require continued effort.
- Sponsored programmatic responses for our 2020 Annual Meeting to the harm done to Black, Indigenous,
and People of Color Members in our 2019 meeting in
Bloomington and historically:
(1) President’s Roundtable: organized by the DAC chair
at the president’s request and cosponsored by the
DAC. The roundtable is called “Diversity, Equity, and
[continued on next page]
Unprecedented and Meaningful Change [continued from previous page]
informative and helpful threads on SEM-L offering valuable of resources for research, teaching, and staying sane
during the ongoing pandemic. We created a COVID-19
Resources for Ethnomusicology section on the home
page of SEM’s website. The website of the College Music
Society also has a wealth of information about teaching
classes and ensembles/lessons online. As I detailed in my
spring newsletter column, many of our chapter meetings
had to be canceled, as were the regional and even national meetings of several of our sister scholarly societies.
SEM now joins that group as we change our 2020 annual
meeting this October to a virtual platform.
Inclusion in SEM” and panelists will include representatives from the 2019 Black Ethnomusicology
panel, the DAC, the Gertrude Robinson Network,
and the SEM Board.
(2) Roundtable survey of membership: President’s
Roundtable panelists will respond to questions pulled
from an anonymous survey sent by the DAC to the
SEM membership prior to the meeting.
(3) Roundtable co-sponsored by the SEM and Canadian Society for Traditional Music Boards titled
“Disrupting White Supremacy in Music and Sound
Studies” and featuring stakeholders from Black and
First Nation communities.
(4) DAC and SEM Board co-sponsored workshop on
tenure for underrepresented groups.
(5) Board sponsored Task Force on Climate Crises
roundtable on climate and social justice.
Some positive developments come out of this crisis,
however. While SEM was already looking for ways to use
virtual meeting platforms to reduce the carbon footprint
of our society before COVID-19, the pandemic shelterat-home orders have moved many of us to develop and
refine skills for virtual teaching, learning, conferencing and
presenting. While we were researching the possibility of a
virtual annual meeting in 2023 for environmental reasons,
we have the opportunity to accomplish that goal now.
Emergency responses to a pandemic are not the ideal
way to achieve beneficial social change, but we hope
that we can use this crisis to adjust our conference and
other SEM-related meetings and even research standards
to the benefit of the environment and our members. As
Aaron Allen, the chair of the SEM Climate Crises Task
Force, reminded me the other day, their approach to ecology and ecomusicology is justice-oriented—similar to the
COVID-19 pandemic, environmental degradation tends
to impact already vulnerable individuals and communities
the most. As SEM moves toward greater virtual conference participation, our commitment is to do all we can to
make sure that this improves our accessibility to those
impacted members.
Will this fix SEM? Will this end epistemic violence against
Black, Indigenous, People of Color, and other aggrieved
individuals and groups at our conferences, in our publications, and in our interpersonal interactions? Will these actions transform SEM into an anti-racist organization? No.
But they may move us closer toward this objective. They
may begin to show aggrieved members that they are vital
to and welcome within SEM. Done well, it might empower
individuals who have felt disempowered. But this is only
the beginning of what must be an ongoing process of
listening, assessment, action, change, repeat.
Repeated again, we have to change. The coronavirus
pandemic hit hard the already fragile academic job market, and the formerly lively gig economy for musicians and
the support staff that allows many musical events to exist.
The USA’s responses to that pandemic were in its early
days when I wrote the spring President’s Column, and
now as I write this summer column, the federal government is urging the nation to return to (business as) normal
as quickly as possible. Many of our members continue to
teach, learn, and conduct research virtually, and indeed
we have shown once again how adaptable we are. We
have begun to change how we do what we do. SEM’s
Board has also been active authoring and endorsing
statements of support for our members and colleagues,
including in some cases writing directly to our institutional
deans, chancellors, and presidents as well as to the U.S.
Congress. Many of these statements advocated particularly for our most vulnerable members who are facing job
insecurity, and for reinvestment in humanities education
and public sector arts funding as an economic engine.
You, our members, have generated several exceptionally
This is a challenging time for us as individuals and as
a scholarly society. All of us are facing challenges and
hardships that we would not have anticipated even a few
months ago. For SEM, this is a time for self-assessment
and of need for real change brought on by crises that
have disrupted the status quo built on white privilege. This
calls for individual and collective commitment and action,
starting with the act of listening. It is time to acknowledge
the many ethnomusicologists of color who have advocated for racial inclusion and equity within SEM for years.
We are listening now. The process of change will require
extended commitment and accountability. It is time. Let’s
get working.
5
Beverley Diamond [continued from page 1]
Visions of Sound is an interrogative exploration of Indigenous instruments’ socio-sonic, spiritual, and material design that refuses generalization. Bev hews to that
refusal and her commitment to working with others in
Native American Music in Eastern North America (Oxford
UP 2008). In the preface, she writes: “I had always vowed
that I would never write a textbook. I am more interested
in exploring the uses and limitations of authority than
setting down what students inevitably would read as… a
truth about the musical practices of a group of people. As
it turns out, by working with a group of Aboriginal advisors
whose knowledge was so deep and whose capacity to
discuss issues of representation was so capable, I found
the preparation of this book one of the most rewarding
projects I have ever undertaken. I hope that the differences among our perspectives remain clear and that this
textbook, then, can never be read simply as a univocal
authoritative text” (xiii). One of the three advisors that Bev
profiles in the text is Haudenosaunee singer Sadie Buck,
whose expertise and friendship have nourished Bev’s musicological practice over decades. Readers feel Sadie’s
presence, not just through quotation, but in the ways Bev
listens to and with Sadie, while taking responsibility for her
own tongue. As Sadie herself has said, “Respect is in the
voice” (Visions of Sound 1994:65).
cians choose mainstream styles instead, and how do they
shape meaning through language choice, through citation
and collaboration?
Ever mindful of process, one of Bev’s many gifts is for
creating welcoming spaces in which diverse stakeholders feel empowered to share their ideas. The Research
Centre for the Study of Music, Media and Place (MMaP)
that Bev established at Memorial University in 2003 is one
such space. Implementing a model that puts university
and broader societal goals into shared relief, MMaP brings
musicians, audiences, communities, and academics into
dialogue, and serves as a crucible in which projects can
be collectively shaped. MMaP’s Back on Track CD series
(now up to 11 releases), for example, presents previously
unreleased archival materials, reissues of out-of-print
recordings, and commissions of new work, all richly documented, providing Indigenous and settler communities
access to their forbearers’ legacies.
As an inspiring mentor to younger scholars, Beverley
Diamond has few peers among Canadian university music
professors. The major projects she has spearheaded,
such as SPINC, Canadian Musical Pathways, and those
at MMaP, have involved extensive input from and training
for countless students, from undergraduates to post-docs.
A tireless champion of her students’ work, many of them
are carrying forward her approach to research and community engagement in the academy and other milieux.
While Bev has stayed on the theoretical cutting edge
throughout her 47-year career, she exhorts her colleagues to think carefully about what theory actually is.
Her article, “Theory from Practice: First Nations Popular
Music in Canada” (Repercussions, 2000) equates social
theory with musical practice—and by musical practice she
means acts of sounding and all their attendant activities.
Practices, then, are not just informed by theory; nor are
they objects to which scholars apply theory. Bev concludes her article by inviting readers “to recognize alternative critical theory in systems rooted in oral tradition or
reliant on … sensory data other than words.”
Since the 1980s, Bev has contributed to SEM at all levels,
serving on or chairing 18 committees prior to taking on the
presidency in 2013. In that role, she amplified the presence of Indigenous voices at the President’s Roundtable
and masterminded the inaugural SEM/ICTM Forum in
2015. Recognizing how the International Council for Traditional Music and SEM support scholars who often work
under very different conditions of knowledge production—
indeed, often with different definitions of what counts as
knowledge—Bev, together with Salwa El Shawan CasteloBranco, engineered a space for conversations among the
societies’ constituent members. In fact, Bev’s organizational allegiances spread in many directions; notably, she
has been steadfast in her support of associations such as
the Canadian Society for Musical Traditions and MusCan.
In the late 1990s, the recording studio emerged as an important site for ethnography, and Bev was there. Following
her Indigenous consultants’ lead, she focussed less on
sonic results and more on the social achievement of those
results. In the studio, Bev discovered that “identity”—ethnomusicologists’ go-to concept for a quarter century—had
lost its explanatory power. As an alternative, she developed “alliance studies,” setting in motion her conviction
that musical practice is theory. Alliance studies is an inquiry-based model that shows how we might hear contemporary expressions of Indigeneity in terms of alignments,
relationships. She asks: What genres do musicians place
their voices in? How does technological mediation inflect
Indigeneity? In her evocation of the model, Bev notes how
Indigenous musicians are under pressure to conform to
a “patron discourse” (van Toorn 1990)—a discourse that
values “unusual” timbres and distinctive practices. What
does it mean, Bev then asks, when Indigenous musi-
An astute grant-writer, Bev has attracted, by herself or
as a member of joint projects, numerous grants from
Canada’s Social Sciences and Humanities Research
Council (SSHRC) as well as other funding agencies.
She has, in turn, served as an expert assessor for many
such agencies, including the European Research Council
(2012–19), and continues to generously assist others in
the process of their grant-writing. Awards and honours
have been bestowed upon Bev in abundance, including a
Festschrift (2010), a Trudeau Fellowship (2009–12), and
election to the Royal Society of Canada (2008), a desig-
6
[continued on next page]
Beverley Diamond [continued from previous page]
designation considered the country’s highest academic
honour. For her manifold accomplishments and for breaking the path for a progressive scholarship of musics in
Canada, SSHRC bestowed its highest accolade upon her
in 2014: the Gold Medal Prize.
SEM Seeks New Journal Editor for Ethnomusicology
The Society for Ethnomusicology invites proposals from
Society members who wish to be considered for the
editorship of the journal Ethnomusicology. The journal
is published three times annually, each issue running
approximately 208 pages and including major research
articles as well as book, recording, and film, video, and
multimedia reviews. The premier journal in the field for
more than sixty years, Ethnomusicology has played a
central role in the expansion of the discipline in the United
States and abroad.
with the approval of the SEM Board of Directors. The editor submits annual reports to the SEM Board of Directors
in September and, at the SEM Annual Meeting, carries
out the following tasks: provides a brief oral report during an SEM Board of Directors meeting, chairs a meeting
with the Journal Editorial Board, chairs a meeting with the
Journal Review Editors, and meets with the Publications
Advisory Committee.
Applicants are strongly encouraged to discuss possible
institutional support with their department chairs and
deans. In addition, SEM offers $3,000 annually for editorial assistance. Frank Gunderson welcomes applicants to
contact him directly at ethnomusicologyeditor@gmail.com
to discuss the tasks involved in editing the journal.
The new editor will be selected by the SEM Board of Directors during the spring of 2021 and will begin a one-year
transition period as Incoming Editor starting in the fall of
2021 and concluding in the fall of 2022. During the transition period, the Incoming Editor will learn procedures and
begin to acquire articles for volume 67, no. 1, with copy
for this issue due at the end of the transition period. Frank
Gunderson, the current Editor, will complete his term with
the Fall 2022 issue (volume 66, no. 3), and the Incoming
Editor will then begin a (renewable) four-year term as Editor in 2023. The total time commitment for the new editor
is thus five years.
Applicants should submit a statement describing: (1)
previous editorial and/or administrative experience; (2) the
extent to which institutional support can be expected; and
(3) why they are interested in serving as Journal Editor. In
addition, they should submit a curriculum vitae and a list
of three referees. Applicants must be members of SEM.
SEM encourages applications from women and underrepresented groups and welcomes nominations from Society
members.SEM’s Publications Advisory Committee will review applications and make recommendations to the SEM
Board of Directors. The deadline for receipt of applications
is February 15, 2021. Please send all materials as email
attachments to Stephen Stuempfle, SEM Executive Director, at semexec@indiana.edu.
The editor is responsible for acquiring and editing research articles (approximately 400 pages of printed
text annually), identifying referees for submissions and
overseeing the review process, coordinating the material
provided by review editors, and working with the University of Illinois Press, which produces the journal. The Editor
is assisted by an Editorial Board, whom she/he appoints
SEM Receives NEH Grant to Document Musicians during COVID-19
The Society for Ethnomusicology is pleased to announce
the award of a CARES Act grant of $74,488 from the National Endowment for the Humanities, in support of a project titled “Musicians in America during the COVID-19 Pandemic.” For this initiative, the Society will contract three
ethnomusicologists for twelve weeks each to research the
impact of COVID-19 and social distancing directives on
music-making throughout the United States.
tion, and well-being, as well as for the artistry, careers,
and economic livelihood of musicians? How are musicians
engaging in alternative modes of musicking, such as
organizing virtual performances via the Internet? SEM will
use edited versions of the interviews and an accompanying interpretive text to create a publicly accessible online
video archive that documents the lives of musicians in this
time of crisis.
Through online video interviews with a cross-section of
musicians associated with diverse communities and music
genres, the researchers will document what it is like to
live in a society almost devoid of music-making in public
space. What are the consequences of this sudden transformation for human sociability, communication, inspira-
“Musicians in America during the COVID-19 Pandemic”
will support SEM’s goals of expanding its work in public/
applied ethnomusicology and promoting ethnomusicology
to a broad audience. For more information, please contact
Steve Stuempfle at semexec@indiana.edu.
7
Member News
In April 2020 the Government
of Japan announced the
foreign recipients of the 2020
Spring Imperial Decorations.
Among this year’s recipients
is William P. Malm, Professor Emeritus at the University of Michigan. Prof. Malm
will receive the Order of the
Rising Sun, Gold Rays with
Neck Ribbon, in recognition
of his contributions toward
promoting academic exchange and strengthening
the relationship between
Japan and the United States.
The official press release
is here: https://www.detroit.
us.emb-japan.go.jp/files/100050308.pdf.[Above, Professor
Mellonee V. Burnim and Portia K. Maultsby’s edited
volume African American Music: An Introduction, now in
its second edition (Routledge 2014), has been included
in The Zora Canon: The 100 Greatest Books Ever Written by African American Women, released in January
2020 and featured on NPR. Their book is the only music
title to make the list, and other than some of the books by
Zora Neale Hurston herself (for whom the list is named),
it is the only book prominently featuring ethnographic
research. Professors Burnim and Maultsby’s book sits
among those of Maya Angelou, Toni Morrison, bell hooks,
Alice Walker, and many other extraordinary authors.
[Above left: Portia K. Maultsby, photo courtesy of Indiana University.
Above right: Mellonee V. Burnim, photo by Lucius T. Outlaw, Jr.]
Malm receiving his Honorary Membership in SEM, 2004. Photo courtesy
of Alan R. Burdette.]
Paul Austerlitz (Sunderman Conservatory at Gettysburg
College) spent his sabbatical in New York City, where he
founded the Spirit Clarinet Orchestra, a 12-piece band
consisting of clarinets, bass clarinets, and Afro-Latin
rhythm section. He also served as Distinguished Visiting Research Scholar at the City University of New York
Dominican Studies Institute, where he helped to develop a
website on the History of Dominican Music in the U.S.
Institutional News
On 5 June 2020 Yuri Shimoda joined the UCLA Ethnomusicology Archive team as a Digitization and Preservation Specialist. Her expertise in heritage audio formats,
community outreach, and repatriation will be critical to the
preservation and dissemination of the archive’s extensive
collection of 150,000 items, which is the second largest AV collection of traditional music in the U.S. after the
Library of Congress.
The manuscript scores collection of Aziz El-Shawan,
20th-century Egypt’s most prominent composer of art
music, was recently processed at Harvard University’s
Loeb Music Library, where the rich collection is held
and where much of it has been digitized and made freely
available online. El-Shawan was a prolific composer who
considered Western tonal music an “international musical language.” He created a new musical idiom in which
he wrote for both Western and Egyptian instruments;
his trips to Moscow as director of Egypt’s Soviet Cultural
Center had led him to befriend and later study with Aram
Khachaturian, whose influence on El-Shawan’s composition style was profound. El-Shawan’s best-known work,
Anās El-Wugūd, became the first Egyptian opera with an
Arabic-language libretto to reach the stage when it was
performed in Cairo in 1996. The composer’s daughter,
ethnomusicologist Salwa El-Shawan Castelo-Branco,
helped bring her father’s collection to Harvard so that it
could be studied and preserved. More information is here:
https://hollisarchives.lib.harvard.edu/repositories/27/resources/4732
The Institute of Music Research at the University of
Würzburg announces a new and revised ethnomusicology program. Tuition is free for all degree students,
regardless of residency or nationality. Seminars are offered in a combination of English and German, and written
work may be submitted in either language. Students must
be able to understand both German and English in their
spoken and written forms, and must be able to speak and
write proficiently in both languages. More information is
here: https://www.musikwissenschaft.uni-wuerzburg.de/
studium/studium-ethnomusikologie.
8
Spotlight on the Archives of Traditional Music:
The First Recordings from the China Project
Catherine Mullen, Indiana University
sity’s Media Digitization and Preservation Initiative, a
mass digitization initiative created to preserve audiovisual
time-based materials across all of the IU campuses. In
addition, a grant from the NEH provided assistance for
digitizing the 7,000 cylinders held at the ATM. In order to
digitize the cylinders in the collection, the project utilizes
a revolutionary stylus-based and laser-measuring technology to account for irregular surfaces on cylinders and
create a smoother, more listenable preservation master.
This machine, the Endpoint Audio Labs Cylinder Playback
Machine, allows engineers to measure irregularities in
the analog media and adjust playback and digitization
efforts accordingly. In order to prepare these recordings
for MCO, ATM staff member Dr. Xiaoshi Wei conducted
research and consulted scholars in China to contextualize
the minimal accompanying documentation. Through these
efforts he was able to check the accuracy of existing
descriptions and supplement metadata created during the
digitization process. This collection is now readily available through MCO. While MCO makes versions of the
recordings available that employ a slight noise reduction
for listenability, outside Indiana University there is continued interest in improving preservational recordings such
as these and recognizing their significance in the history
of audio recordings more generally. For instance, a project
based in China aims to release fully restored versions of
the recordings in a CD set. In addition, Dr. Patrick Feaster,
a scholar of early recording technology, addresses the
potential for stereo reproduction in a recent blog post,
demonstrating that some recordings in this collection are
likely the earliest surviving stereo recordings.
From the earliest days of ethnomusicology, archives have
been a constant companion to our discipline and its work.
Archival collections have proliferated in ethnomusicological institutions around the globe, predominantly focusing on ethnographic and commercial recordings ranging
from phonographic cylinders, discs, and open reel tapes
to more recent forms of analog and digital audiovisual
recordings. Starting with the early 20th-century work of
the Berliner Phonogramm-Archiv and extending to the efforts of ethnographic archives both large and small today,
the objective of the archive has constantly expanded to
address the preservation and dissemination of ethnomusicology’s most vulnerable artifacts. This utility points to the
many roles of the archive within ethnomusicology, from
a repository for fieldwork done by innumerous ethnographers to a resource for future generations of researchers
and community collaborators. At Indiana University’s Archives of Traditional Music (ATM), this important balance
between preservation and dissemination is evident in a
number of recent projects aimed at digitization and accessibility. There, ATM Director Dr. Alan Burdette and a team
of audio preservation engineers and researchers have
been working to prepare 400 phonographic cylinders in
the Berthold Laufer China Collection for digital accessibility through Indiana University’s Media Collections Online
(MCO) platform.
Berthold Laufer, a prominent sinologist from Germany,
was recruited by the anthropologist Franz Boas to complete ethnographic fieldwork in China at the turn of the
20th century. The recordings deposited in the ATM were
originally created by Laufer between 1901 and 1902 as
part of a one-man expedition funded by the banker and
philanthropist Jacob Henry Schiff and supported by the
American Museum of Natural History (AMNH). As Dr.
Burdette states, “the goal of the original collecting trip
directed by Franz Boas was to gather artifacts of everyday
life and industry in China.” The parts of the Laufer collection held at the ATM, consisting entirely of phonograph
recordings, focus on vernacular music including theatrical
opera from Beijing and Shanghai, as well as performances in spaces such as tea houses and brothels. Thousands
of other artifacts and paper materials collected on this
expedition remain in the holdings of the AMNH. The recordings at the ATM are likely some of the earliest recordings of instrumental music recorded in China, and their
historical significance has called for precise and delicate
approaches to technological preservation.
Through the work done with the Laufer collection, the ATM
shows how contributing to historical preservation and accessibility continues to be a priority for archives in ethnomusicology. However, as Dr. Burdette argues, the significance of archival work in ethnomusicology lies not only in
the final products made accessible by archives, but also in
the effort put into the process of archiving. This process is
one of care and stewardship. “We live in a time when we
have ready access to music and media recordings from
many generations, so it is easy to take for granted how
it is that these recordings are available. In every case,
someone or an institution made a choice and the necessary investment to care for those recordings.” It is therefore through constantly applied care that archives help us
to continually work towards an understanding of cultures
throughout history. Succinctly summarizing the value
of the Laufer collection and recordings held in archives
today, Dr. Burdette states: “These kinds of recordings help
humanize the past and allow us to better understand the
ways in which the people of that time and place were both
different and very much similar to ourselves today.”
Although these materials have been publicly available
to researchers through the ATM since it was founded in
1954, it is only within the past few years that efforts have
been made to make this collection digitally accessible.
The Laufer digitization project is part of Indiana Univer-
9
Notes from the Field: Social Distancing, Virtual Performance,
and Labor of Compassion in Iran
Payam Yousefi, Harvard University
It is common knowledge among ethnomusicologists that
fieldwork is filled with unexpected developments. We plan
rigorously for this rite of passage, but inevitably once ethnographic research begins we are at the mercy of varying
factors that in many cases are out of our hands. This year
in Iran has been a crash course in this reality with coronavirus being the newest unexpected obstacle.
sessions. These sessions consisted of casual conversations between artists, Q&A with the comments section,
and collaborative live improvisatory performance. The
almost seamless adaption of classical Persian music’s
call-and-response formats to virtual musical collaboration stood out to me as particularly unique compared to
the more produced musical content on social media from
around the world. The custom of new year visitations
continued in a virtual format, and musical life persisted to
function as a vehicle to create such gatherings.
COVID-19 has disrupted life in unprecedented ways all
around the world. In 2020 we witnessed temporary closures of institutions, enforcement of social distancing, and
varying approaches to quarantine that have put a pause
on daily life and interactions. Iran, too, is grappling with
the traumatic effects of this virus as one of the first countries to be hit with a crippling outbreak. Increasing death
tolls, amplified economic hardship, and the absence of
social normalcy have left the country in a state of anxiety.
Javab-e avaz, Hamrahi, and Hal: A Musical Dialogue
of Support and Healing in Crisis
In these dire times, the adaptions of Iran’s musical life to
these circumstances have emerged as an unexpected
case study. Currently Instagram Live has become a space
for broadcasting real-time musical collaboration and
democratized transmission within the otherwise exclusive
tradition of classical Persian music. In this time of social
distancing the syncing of musical culture with social media
technologies has become a means of expanding interactions and dialogues. Not only have virtual interactions
become a means of solidarity and togetherness that ease
the burden of this pandemic on citizens’ mental health,
but these virtual broadcasts have also amplified the real
humanitarian work musicians are engaged in during this
time of crisis.
The Spring that Did Not Awake
Mandatory stay-at-home orders in Iran were announced
several days before the Persian New Year, concurrent
with the first day of spring. This is usually a time of celebration, when the country is on a thirteen-day vacation.
Families gather to celebrate the arrival of spring by visiting
each other’s homes in the spirit of renewal. It is a time
of forgetting the past, putting aside old grudges, eating
sweets, and receiving gifts from elders. Iranians had much
to forget and put behind them this year, with the increased
pressure of sanctions on the economy, crackdowns on
protests, geopolitical tensions with the US, and the tragic
downing of passenger flight 752. Unfortunately, stay-athome orders rendered this age-old tradition of renewal
incapable of fulfilling its social function in a time when it
was needed most.
Several days into the mandatory-stay-at home orders, I
noticed a growing number of musicians hosting live video
The practice of avaz o javab-e avaz is the main formal
vehicle that drives improvisatory dialogue between Iranian
vocalists and instrumentalists. This style of performance
became a fixture of live online sessions, where two musicians would improvise from the safety of their respective
homes for all to see. The distinct features of this form
enable musical collaboration on live video calls in a way
that uses the video lag inherent within these technologies.
Both the musical characteristics as well as the extramusical meanings within this form make it ripe for practical use
in today’s climate.
Avaz o javab-e avaz literally translates as vocalizations
(avaz) and response to vocalizations (javab-e avaz). In
this form of call-and-response dialogue, first the singer
will improvise highly ornamented melismatic phrases onto
poetry, and then the instrumentalist responds with an approximation that is inflected with personal embellishments
and interpretations. This dialogic form of collaboration
facilitates the improvisatory exploration of modal-melodic
spaces within this creative practice. (See https://www.
youtube.com/watch?v=6aCWtmDuLMU)
A key driving force of the improvisation’s success within
this form relies on a specific type of accompaniment the
instrumentalist provides called hamrahi. Essentially, as the
vocalist sings, the instrumentalist instantly imitates those
melodies, reproducing them at a second’s delay at a lower
volume under the voice. This display of aural precision
and imitative capacity by the instrumentalist functions both
as a method of making mental notes of what has been
sung to ensure an accurate response, while also creating
a supportive sonorous space that empowers the vocalist’s
improvisatory explorations. The collaboration between the
vocalist Pouria Akhavaas and the setar player Amir Nojan
is a prime example of how the formal call-and-response
structure (javab-e avaz) and delayed accompaniment
(hamrahi) allow this musical form to harness video lag
within virtual performances.
[continued on next page}
10
Notes from the Field [continued from previous page]
The connotations of solidarity, support, and intimacy
embedded in the term hamrahi also bear significance in
understanding the extramusical functions within these performances. While hamrahi translates to accompaniment,
it also translates to companionship and sodality in a path
toward a shared destination: in the Persian language, the
term is used in expressing sentiments of intimacy between individuals on a shared path towards truth seeking
in Sufism, while also expressing solidarity and comradery
toward social-justice in the political context. Looking back
to the example of Nojan and Akhavaas, it becomes clear
how hamrahi accompaniment is a musical exemplar of
such sentiments of support. Nojan’s hamrahi accompaniment masterfully reproduces the newly heard melodies
in an aesthetically inspiring manner to create a supportive sonic space, and, as the performance progresses,
Akhavaas increasingly pushes his virtuosic limits and
improvisatory explorations. This gradually building trust
also leads to further concepts of musical intimacy and
euphoria.
The principles of good hamrahi accompaniment are
similar to those of healthy dialogue: listening, processing, making space for another presence, and eventually responding within context. When this supportive
musical dialogue functions at its highest capacity the
accompaniment creates a sense of companionship and
trust— termed ham deli, literally translating to sameheartedness—that empowers the musicians to tap into
spontaneous virtuosity and creativity. At such a moment, a
state of euphoric reflection termed hal occurs for the practitioners and audience. Hal translates to presence, expressing being in the moment in a space of balance and
solitude that inspires affective listening and performance.
In Persian music circles, the state of hal is believed to be
therapeutic for the performers and listeners.
Typically, such affective hal-evoking performances reach
their most elevated states in private musical gatherings
that occur in the intimate spaces of homes. With the
adaption of musical collaboration onto Instagram Live, this
space is opened up to a larger public that transcends the
limitations of a living room, becoming a collective, democratized form of mass listening. In the absence of intimate
gatherings so core to the customs of New Year, this performative tradition of companionship has become a small
form of emotional refuge and therapeutic listening for
masses stuck in their homes. While performances have
adapted to new formats, instruction has also continued to
play a role in musical life amidst social distancing.
Sineh-be-sineh (heart-to-heart): Guidance and Mentorship in Crisis
In Iran, instruction is another vital sector of musical life.
Teaching is the primary source of income for the majority
of musicians. Moreover, music transmission functions as
a pillar for specific social values with ethical overtones.
By mid-February, this important sphere of musical life
tied to monetary and cultural value was impacted by the
pandemic, as all private and public educational institutions
were mandatorily closed to prevent the further spread of
the virus.
Within a week, many musicians began posting on Instagram that they will be teaching online. This took many
forms, from holding instructional sessions for everyone
to see on Instagram Live, posting sections from group
classes on WhatsApp’s groups video chat feature, and
some individuals even offering free lessons to ease the
burdens of quarantine.
The foundational role of imitative call-and-response transmission in classical Persian music also neatly transferred
into this online format. This tradition of oral transmission
is called sineh-be-sineh, which literally means heart to
heart—poetically expressing the close and intimate nature
of master and apprentice in this form of transmission. In
this tradition, the student sits face-to-face with their teacher as the teacher performs musical phrases one-by-one.
As the phrases are performed, the student is required to
imitate them identically until those phrases are learned
and memorized. While notation is heavily used in instruction today, oral methods of transmission are still used for
teaching the details of the music that must be embodied—
i.e., specific micro-rhythms, qualitative accents, and
intonations. The video of Omid Mostafavi—a well-known
tombak performer and instructor—teaching his students
on WhatsApp is an example of such lessons. Lessons like
this have played a vital role in creating a sense of normalcy during stay-at-home orders. (See https://www.youtube.
com/watch?v=81DL-OoTzFo)
While speaking with Mostafavi, he mentioned how the
online lessons played a huge role in helping students with
their sanity while being stuck in their homes for months.
Omid stated:
Lessons helped everyone stay home and stay safe.
Especially when being stuck at home felt frustrating. It
is good to have a kind of motivation to help time pass
and I think, as students saw themselves improve on
their instruments, it provided them motivation for the
next day. Lessons do not solve our bigger problems,
but having something to move toward becomes a good
way to cope. In a way, it makes us mentally stronger.
The teacher, or Ostad, is an important figure in the lives
of pupils. The space of apprenticeship is one of moral and
ethical cultivation, and, as can be seen in Omid’s statements, the lessons and guidance provided transcend
musical instruction. These spaces become all the more
important in a time of crisis. In his Instagram interview
with Nojan during quarantine, Fariborz Azizi, an authoritative tar instructor, spoke about
[continued on following page]
11
Notes from the Field [continued from previous page]
his memories of apprenticing with Ostad Mohammad
Reza Lotfi and the role this apprenticeship played in his
life. He reflected on how lessons were a form of self-care:
“Every time I had a lesson with Lotfi, I was energized for
the whole week. It was like going to the doctor and getting
injected with vitamins.” Azizi ended this interview by offering free online lessons for the duration of the quarantine
to students in Iran as an attempt to turn the experience
of COVID-19 into a positive one. While Iranians were
not able to receive gifts from visiting their elders this new
year, Fariborz gave everyone their eidi, or gift, in the form
of music lessons in a time when people may have needed
it the most.
Sineh-be-sineh, or heart-to-heart instruction, in such
a context fittingly expresses the role of solidarity and
togetherness that musical life has been providing in these
troubling times. Apprenticeship, in addition to being a
vital step in gaining musical knowledge, is also a pillar for
building character, strength, and wisdom. The guidance
and mentorship provided in sineh-be sineh instruction is
a continuing cultural institution that provides support and
prepares pupils to better deal with the anxieties attached
to crisis.
Performing the Labor of Compassion
The scope of this report from the field leaves me unable
to delve into all the occurrences within musical life amidst
COVID-19, but I would be remiss if I did not end by mentioning the humanitarian work being done by artists. As all
performance venues were closed due to the pandemic,
a group of artists got together to turn Hafez Performance
Hall in Tehran into a makeshift assembly line for sewing
masks, hospital gowns, scrubs, and even making food
baskets.
The idea started with the actor, playwright, and director
Hamid Sharifzadeh wanting to make protective gear for
health centers located in shantytowns on the peripheries
of the capital that were lacking proper resources. Speaking with the vocalist Mina Deris, she mentioned how
everything started very simple, but took off in a grassroots
fashion: twenty-eight sewing machines were donated
from Rudaki Hall, and a collection of costume designers,
musicians, visual artists, and actors began working three
shifts around the clock to make and prepare supplies for
those suffering the most. (See https://www.youtube.com/
watch?v=LkJXoU-e14w)
Deris mentioned how, after several days of long shifts,
she suggested that they invite musicians to play live
music in the afternoons to help energize volunteers. After
posting the musical performance and humanitarian work
on Instagram Live, musicians from all genres began volunteering to perform and work for the cause. Deris went
on to say:
It is amazing how everything came together without any
planned structure. Every afternoon, I look out at everyone working together in the hall and I cannot help but
think we are in the middle of a harmonious performance
of care and love…a unique symphony consisting of
the sound of scissors and sewing machines blended
with music…a collage of sound that has become the
soundtrack to a labor of compassion.
COVID-19 is still with us and much is unknown about the
long-term effects this virus will have. One glimmer of hope
can be seen in how individuals, traditions, and institutions
adapt to new circumstances to decrease suffering. Deris
said it best when she characterized their work as a labor
of compassion (kare deli). Indeed, compassion and empathy are the driving forces keeping musical life moving forward today and facilitating circumstances for persistence.
12
Good Trouble: Methods for Music Ethnography in and of Crisis
Shannon Garland, UCLA, Guest Editor
It’s the last weekend of May 2020, and I have ethnographic double vision. I’m in Los Angeles, watching a livestream
of a Black Lives Matter march in New York on Instagram.
As the camera pans, I try to identify the protest’s precise
location within the city where I earned my Ph.D. six years
ago. That was back during the first wave of mass protests
set off by the killing of Michael Brown in Ferguson, Missouri. I’m beset with memories of the protests back then,
on those same New York streets, once again happening
for the very same reason. But I’m also listening to the
Portuguese-language narration of the march, noting the
translations of the street chants, and trying to pinpoint the
voice of the speaker—is that Felipe? No, wrong accent.
Maybe someone new. The protest is being streamed by
Mídia Ninja, a Brazilian media activism group directly
connected to my fieldwork in Brazil, Chile, and the US
on independent music economies and politics. I’m beset
with memories of Brazilian cities during my dissertation
fieldwork, when this group’s actions came into just about
every conversation. This livestream by a fieldwork-related
Brazilian group of a protest march in my old hometown
illustrates the near complete lack of separation between
my fieldwork life and my “life-life.” If anything, the fieldwork-inaugurated social connections I maintain through
digital means ground me, lending a stability that the vagaries of academic employment constantly threaten to unravel. What do I do with the years of experience—my own
and those of my interlocutors and friends— that make up
the ethnographic archive, ever populated, that I began
building 17 years ago? To whom do I owe ethnographic
analysis, and whom might it serve?
understand it, and on the other hand, the multiple conditions of crisis in which the class unfolded and to which, as
a course of professional training, it is also bound. A field
methods course, it took place entirely on Zoom, due to
COVID-19. It concluded during the most intense (so far) of
the multiple uprisings that blossomed following the police
murder of George Floyd in Minneapolis, following the murder of so many. I am not the first to point out that these
killings and their responses—in many ways unprecedented—are produced by a larger social system arranged by
flagrant consumption of life as a form of plunder, whose
most malignant effects are distributed unevenly according
to the legacy of European colonial conquest and slaveryfueled capitalism. The COVID -19 and Black Lives Matter
events, if one can call them that, have thus served as
points of inflection that lay bare the broad structural crises
of a society that builds social inequity, articulated along
racial, national, gender, class and other lines, into its very
constitution. This includes, of course, higher education,
whose own inequities have only worsened through a long
history of what economists call “structural adjustment,”
producing a majority-contingent teaching body in which
underrepresented groups are overrepresented. Disciplines like ethnomusicology, as Danielle Brown recently
reminded us (2020), are composed of both these structural configurations as well as the underlying colonial
fascination with cultural difference upon which ethnological methods are founded, decades of critique of these
models notwithstanding; committees, workshops, offices,
Assistant Vice Provosts of, and job statements on diversity, equity, and inclusion notwithstanding.
This is an introduction to a collection of short ethnographic reflections written by first-year Ph.D. students in
the Ethnographic Methods course I taught in the spring
2020 quarter at UCLA. I chose to open it with a vignette,
as ethnomusicologists are wont, because how I taught
the course could not be separated from, on the one hand,
my own experiences and practices of ethnography, as I
Consequently, in addition to the traditional aspects of field
methods, I needed to address several other questions
with respect to the class: how do I teach students in a field
methods course conducted entirely online? If an academic
career, in the form of a tenure-track job, is well beyond a
reasonable expectation for an ethnomusicology Ph.D., of
what utility, for both the students and [continued on next page]
13
Good Trouble [continued from previous page]
the world, can music ethnography be? Relatedly, “for
whom is ethnomusicology?” This last question, I argue,
should remain prominent in our ethnographic methods
and scholarship, for it forces us to hold at the center of inquiry questions of structural inequity, and reminds us that
we can engage in forms of organizing to produce desperately needed structural change.
The act of teaching field methods surely would have
prompted me to reflect on my own ethnographic incursions no matter the circumstances. But the questioning
of the purpose of and audience for ethnomusicological
research was spurred more than anything else by my
working conditions, hardly unique, within the academy. I
spent the first three years after completing my Ph.D. pasting together a living through administration, ESL teaching, tutoring, and adjunct teaching. Now, three years of a
postdoctoral appointment had allowed me to resume my
work and have time to develop it, clarifying my big and
little projects around an overarching intellectual project.
But my appointment was ending, once again bringing
instability and, let’s be frank, panic. I spent most of the
term scrambling to pitch myself to just any about any “altac” job I could find while tens of millions of people were
being laid off. In addition to alerting students to the reality
of the job market, then, I encouraged them to think about
their projects not just in terms of the academic hoops they
would have to jump through, but as broader life projects
articulated around their own ethical, personal, and political commitments. I couldn’t just prepare them for a job I
myself didn’t seem to have. We thus tried to conceptualize field techniques not as the adventurer gone to extract
data from “other” neatly bounded people and places in the
service of our own careers; rather, we read pieces emphasizing the personal relationships we build and upon which
our ethnographic data rely (Hellier-Tinoco 2003); ethical
commitments and the issue of “unusable data” (Hamilton
2009), and a model of ethnography which takes relationships, including conflict, rather than organic wholes as its
conceptual starting point (Desmond 2014).
Meanwhile, some of the anxieties emerging in ethnomusicology discourse about COVID-induced online fieldwork
were strange to me. My projects have always investigated
online cultural production and its intersections with offline
social life and music, partially contributing, as with the
opening vignette, to the inseparability of my fieldwork and
non-fieldwork lives. I became interested in indie music
in Santiago because Chilean friends, part of transnational, though globally unequal, middle class art worlds in
cosmopolitan cities, took me to shows. I got a MySpace
page as part of the everyday sociality of this peer group,
in Chile and at home, and explored the musical and social
connections presented and maintained on the site as both
underground indie activity in Santiago as well as a transnational articulation of indie occurring through new media
platforms. My first official field interview was conducted
remotely, me in New York, Cristián Araya in Santiago,
through gchat (Google Mail’s messaging function, now
“Hangouts”). COVID shut down, then, did not disrupt the
“hybrid” (Przybylski 2020) nature of my fieldwork, in which
I maintain my relationships with interlocutors, interlocutorfriends, events, and discourses through various digital
means, continuing in person when I can travel to Chile or
Brazil, or when these friends visit me on tour or for leisure.
Yet the anxiety around online forms of fieldwork perhaps
belies the discipline’s continued investment in the image
of organic, holistic music-making conducted by easily
circumscribable “cultures,” existing in equally circumscribed places “remote” (to North America), all of which
the proverbial white ethnomusicologists travel to, discover,
extract from, and finally convey to elite peers. This lingering model, which Danny Gough once aptly described as
ethnomusicology’s “music, place, identity, go!” paradigm,
seems to persist despite the decades of work in ethnography-based fields, including ethnomusicology itself (Cooley, Meizel and Syed 2008), that show the fragmented or
uneven nature of places—that the very constitution of
notions of culture, identity, place, and the relations between them are historically-produced and always subject
to political contestation (Gupta and Ferguson 1997).
The composition of the ethnographic materials of analysis are thus part of these very political contestations, and
cannot be separated from the various positionalities of
the ethnographer, including those of gender, race, ablebodiedness, and class, as well as how ethnographers and
their interlocutors, as in my case, are differentially located
within an uneven global order configured by colonization
and imperialist capitalism. The disruption of the students’
in-person fieldwork plans due to COVID-19 thus also
facilitated the methodological conceptualization of the field
not around a bounded unity, the “music, place, identity,
go!” paradigm; rather, we scrutinized the processes and
logics of defining groups, places, identities, and music,
including the political question of who gets to define. We
read Howard Becker’s (1982) Tricks of the Trade, which
interrogates the relation between researchers’ “imagery”
and concepts, their practical methods, and the larger
claims they can make. Becker’s “tricks” are ways of turning research subjects, questions, and methods inside out
and upside down, examining them from all sides, finding
their flaws and limits. I realized, in the course of teaching,
that my own thinking had been conditioned by a question
always raised by my graduate mentor Ana María Ochoa,
which I began calling “Ana’s Trick.” A simple maneuver
that produces complicated results, the trick consists of
adding the question “for whom?” to statements and definitions in the process of conceptualizing and “writing up”
research. For example, if I am going to make a statement
about indie music and political organizing in Brazil, if I
make myself answer the question “for whom?,” I’m forced
to contend with the differing and often conflicting array of
opinions and actions surrounding the [continued on next page]
14
Good Trouble [continued from previous page]
subject, including my own social relationships and political
commitments. This prevents me from romanticizing indie
practices as overly cohesive, situates my own analysis as
always qualified, and allows me to better see—and interrogate—the differing sets of actors and positions at play.
Similarly, then, in relation to ethnomusicology, and particularly within a context in which even the scant tenure-track
jobs that Ph.Ds. annually fight over are being paused,
cancelled, and rescinded, itself configured within the larger social structures that produce quotidian dispossession,
ecological collapse, and spectacular and mundane state
violence, our scholarship is for whom? The questions of
the audience for academic work, its publishing structures,
and even the casualization of teaching labor are of course
not new, but I believe the multiple crises of our time renew
their importance, because any structural changes to inequity within our disciplines must contend with them. After
all, these crises, and in particular their effects, are “new”
for whom, exactly?
With that in mind, the pieces presented here were not
written with a clear answer to the question of “for whom?,”
at least in regard to their place of publication. Rather, they
arose because of the impossibility of conducting in-person
fieldwork as a method of training during COVID-19. I also
proposed this endeavor because I thought that a kind
of collective project would give direction and energy to
the awkward and dispiriting hours spent on Zoom. Thus,
instead of asking students to employ many different ethnographic techniques, such as attending and describing
a live performance, conducting an ethnographic interview,
or doing the “deep hanging out” of ethnographic participation, I asked them to conduct any aspect of ethnographic
work and to write it up for a music-centered, academic
blog post for a venue to be determined. We read Deborah
Wong’s (2008) wonderful grappling with her own multiple
identities, positionalities, and ethnographic commitments
through the act of writing ethnography, and I similarly
wanted to emphasize that writing, as the premier form of
ethnomusicological research presentation and argument,
was crucial to the process of working out research questions and their corresponding ethnographic tasks. I also
wanted to allow for different kinds of experiences and
activities to be considered ethnographic— that we might
think of ethnography not as immersion in the other or as
a set of techniques, but rather as an analytical stance
towards the everyday world.
These student essays collectively address all of the aforementioned issues. The pieces by Dexter Story, Delaney
Miranda Yuko Ross, and Alec Norkey wrestle with the
imbrication of the personal and the ethnographic, as well
as place and ethics. Story’s curiosity about the possible
connections between the late musician Nipsey Hussle,
who had family roots in Eritrea, and his ongoing explorations of Guayla music in the Horn of Africa, led him to
reexamine a track he had created, mixing Nipsey’s music
and Guayla, as a way of processing the artist’s death.
Story grapples with the ethical implications of combining
these sounds, as well as the extent to which the mix is
his own fabrication, or if Nipsey, too, had a relationship
to Guayla (he did!). Delaney Miranda Yuko Ross, finding
herself unexpectedly quarantined at her parents’ house,
took the opportunity to interrogate her relationship to race
and identity in her home state of Hawai‘i. Focusing on the
political disputes surrounding the Thirty Meter Telescope
on Mauna Kea, she notes how the conflict has animated
questions of native Hawaiian identity and language in a
place where most people are mixed race, and where native Hawaiian history and culture has only recently been
incorporated into formal schooling and public value. These
pieces represent a new take on the “music, place, identity” paradigm— one, perhaps, without the straightforward
“go!” Meanwhile, Alec Norkey turns an ethnographic gaze
upon his own long experience in higher education music
professionalization programs, drawing upon his intimate
knowledge of the Western classical performance world
to conduct an interview with a friend-turned-interlocutor.
His ethnographic exploration presented not an adventure
outward to an unknown world, but a return to his own life
under different conditions, with different purposes. These
pieces show the entwinement of personal life and ethnographic inquiry, exploding the self/other, insider/outsider
dichotomies ethnomusicology can so often remain centered upon.
Ciera Ott and Tingting Tang, for their part, explore the
possibilities and limits of online-only musical participation and research. Tang describes how the cohesion of
the Balkan Music Ensemble at UCLA formed in relation
to the openness of the professors and participants to
suddenly receive newcomers to the in-person rehearsal
space; this cohesion was important for maintaining the
ensemble in an online, dramatically changed form. While
she found some advantages to singing from one’s room,
Tang missed the spontaneity and magic created by new
people walking through the ensemble door. Similarly,
Ciera Ott, whose plans to interview elderly people were
halted by COVID-19, found a different way to think about
her research project, centered on older performers and
fans. Observing livestream-style replays of Metallica
concerts on YouTube, Ott notes the somewhat expanded
ethnographic possibilities contained in monitoring the live
chat and comments, as well as the many limitations to
observation, especially for pinpointing who is participating
and what their assessments are. Through this activity Ott
confirmed the necessity of asking interlocutors questions
specific to her research.
These essays were written at a time of intense stress and
uncertainty, which will surely continue for the foreseeable future. But I would like to suggest that, regarding the
questions of the aim and scope
[continued on next page]
15
Good Trouble [continued from previous page]
of our field and its imbrication with and as systemic
inequity (and violence), this uncertainty can be “good
trouble.” We can remake our scholarship and our social
institutions in accords with our stated values. But only if
we embrace conflict and, to borrow some phrases from
Arruzza, Bhattacharya, and Fraser (2019), struggle “in
and through diversity” to build solidarity and effect structural change.
F. Barz, 2nd ed., 90–107. New York: Oxford University
Press.
Gupta, Akhil, and James Ferguson. 1997. ‘Beyond “Culture”: Space, Identity, and the Politics of Difference’. In
Culture, Power, Place, edited by Akhil Gupta and James
Ferguson, 33–51. Duke University Press.
Desmond, Matthew. 2014. “Relational Ethnography.”
Theory and Society 43 (5): 547–79.
Support your campus unions and pay grad students
more.
Hamilton, Jennifer A. 2009. “On the Ethics of Unusable
Data.” In Fieldwork Is Not What It Used to Be : Learning
Anthropology’s Method in a Time of Transition, edited by
Michael M. J. Fischer, George E. Marcus, and James D.
Faubion, 73–88. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Works Cited
Arruzza, Cinzia, Tithi Bhattacharya, and Nancy Fraser.
2019. Feminism for the 99%: A Manifesto. New York:
Verso.
Hellier-Tinoco, Ruth. 2003. “Experiencing People: Relationships, Responsibility and Reciprocity.” British Journal
of Ethnomusicology 12 (1): 19–34.
Becker, Howard Saul. 1998. Tricks of the Trade : How to
Think about Your Research While You’re Doing It. Chicago, Ill: University of Chicago Press.
Przybylski, Liz. 2020. Hybrid Ethnography. Thousand
Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Brown, Danielle. 2020. “An Open Letter on Racism in
Music Studies.” My People Tell Stories (blog). 2020.
https://www.mypeopletellstories.com/blog/open-letter
Wong, Deborah A. 2008. “Moving: From Performance to
Performative Ethnography and Back Again.” In Shadows
in the Field : New Perspectives for Fieldwork in Ethnomusicology, edited by Timothy J Cooley and Gregory F.
Barz, 2nd ed., 76–89. New York: Oxford University Press.
Cooley, Timothy J, Katherine Meizel, and Nasir Syed.
2008. “Virtual Fieldwork: Three Case Studies.” In Shadows in the Field : New Perspectives for Fieldwork in Ethnomusicology, edited by Timothy J Cooley and Gregory
Nipsey Hussle, Guayla Music and the Ethnographic Remix
Dexter Story, UCLA
It is reasonable to contend that, except in Ethiopia,
throughout the global diaspora, and, perhaps, within
a “world music” context, Eritrea is not particularly well
known for its music. Home to roughly three million inhabitants and bordering the Red Sea between Sudan, Djibouti
and Somalia, the northeast African nation has made headlines for its hard-won autonomy rather than the cultural
output of its multi-ethnic population. Although the country
came to greater prominence under tragic circumstances
when Eritrean-American rapper, activist and entrepreneur
Ermias “Nipsey Hussle” Asghedom was brutally murdered
in early 2019, the indigenous soundscape of the country
is largely uncharted, obscured by similar celebrity congruences, a long politicized history with its southern neighbor
Ethiopia, and its controversial human rights record.
However, just as Eritrea has persevered and recently begun to emerge from what the Human Rights Watch World
Report deems “decades of near total diplomatic isolation”
(HRW 2019), so has its most prominent music export continued to thrive and shape the identity of Eritrean people
internationally. Often also called Tigrinya after the Semitic
language widely spoken in Eritrea and the Horn of Africa,
Guayla music is best described in conventional Western
notational terms as a predominantly 5/8 odd-metered
rhythmic vocal song form primarily performed with handstruck kebero drum and mute-and-release strummed
krar box lyre accompaniment. The unmistakably regional
sound and style, also increasingly programmed electronically on synthesizer keyboards and drum machines, is
a necessary element at holiday gatherings, weddings,
celebrations, cultural centers, festivals and even militaristic convenings.
Largely identified by traditional instrumentation and oldworld associations, during my travels in the Horn of Africa
I also observed Guayla in hip hop nightclubs as official
“turn up” music for a growing scene of youthful East African partygoers. The beat-driven, two-step circle dance it
invokes has powerful meaning and affect, inspiring global
fascination and suggesting academic inquiry. Even as
recently as the mid-nineties, the
[continued on next page]
16
Nipsey Hussle [continued from previous page]
World Music Rough Guide maintained that “Tigrinya
music from Eritrea and Tigre, which is even less familiar in the west than Ethiopian Amharic music, is worth a
detour for its repetitive, throbbing, camel-walk rhythms”
(Rough Guide 1994). Accordingly, with a relative paucity
of available academic materials on the genre, my inability
to speak Tigrinya, and current COVID-19 constraints, I
propose here a brief rearticulation of Eritrea’s idiosyncratic
music using a localized hero narrative. In this case, the
musical remix becomes a vehicle with which ethnography
traces important new perspectives and inquiries.
As is widely known, Nipsey Hussle’s homicide on March
31st, 2019, had a devastating yet uniquely galvanizing
impact on those who knew him, knew his music or knew
of him. In spite of the collective trauma we experienced
by the premature silencing of such an emerging artivist,*
entrepreneur and symbol of urban redemption, there was
an unprecedented and endearing unification among the
African American and Eritrean communities in South Los
Angeles due to his murder. The extended memorial for the
slain icon at the intersection of Slauson Avenue and Crenshaw Boulevard (one hundred feet from where he was
shot on his property in front of his flagship Marathon retail
store) saw scores of multiracial fans pay their respects in
peaceful silence. Conspicuously present were flag-draped
Eritrean immigrant locals representing Nipsey’s paternal
African heritage, mourning in tandem with Los Angeles
natives who reflected his maternal Black background
and other affiliations. Nipsey epitomized that intersection
across ethnic, generational, and social lines for many of
us with roots in South Central. His music also became the
anthem for our pain and washed over all of us as it wailed
from cars, motorcycles, boomboxes and Bluetooth speakers for weeks throughout the city. Likewise, the four-hour
memorial at the Staples Center in downtown Los Angeles satisfied our deep ritual impulses to gather, pay our
respects, mourn and musick together. While his spirited
music blurred those social boundaries between us in attendance, I reflected on how the collective memory of this
fallen hero, his vast recorded catalog and the gospel and
hip hop-tinged performances at the star-studded, sold-out
tribute might have also incorporated and leveraged the
indigenous music-making from Nipsey’s Eritrean lineage.
Where, in fact, was the Tigrinya music?
Nipsey Hussle was a self-made recording artist whose
short-lived career was greatly exceeded by his prolific
musical yield and legion of admirers. I am one of them.
I jumped on the bandwagon when he released the 2009
Drake collaboration Killer and immediately back- tracked
to and purchased his 2005 Slauson Boy, Volume 1. A
friend nudged me to listen to 2011’s The Marathon Continues and from then on I was a convert up to the long-await-
* Individuals who see an organic relationship between art
and activism (Sandoval and Latorre 2008).
ed and posthumously Grammy-nominated 2018 Victory
Lap. Billionaire rapper Shawn “Jay-Z” Carter is rumored
to have bought one hundred copies of Nipsey’s $100
Crenshaw mixtape in 2013, while those in-the-know had
already embraced the rapper-turned-philanthropist as one
of our own. My first inclination after hearing of Nipsey’s
murder was to celebrate his existing West Coast hip hop
repertoire like many others. However, I suddenly wanted
to hole up inside of my recording studio and experiment
with grafting an acapella of one of his songs to a Guayla
beat I had created months prior. Nipsey’s four-month pilgrimage in 2004 to visit relatives and explore his roots in
Eritrea inspired me, in my pain and frustration, to reconcile him with his direct African musical lineage.
For my remix, I went back to the Slauson Boy, Volume
2 album’s aptly titled track “Mercy,” featuring the pleading chorus refrain of Stacy Barthe and some of Nipsey’s
most memorable lyrics, or “bars.” I then lined up Nipsey’s
distinct cadence so that each line coincides with two
measure intervals of my original minor pentatonic Tigrinya
track. The breakthrough blending, edited and mixed in
Apple’s Logic X digital audio workstation on a 2017 iMac,
worked out better than I had imagined, and the production experiment was well-received by close personal
colleagues who were both fans of Nipsey and who knew
my work in Ethiopian and Eritrean music. The result is an
almost 3-minute sonic anomaly, pushing even beyond the
musical hybridity and cross-culturalization reminiscent in
Jamaican dancehall and Congolese rumba covers.
The aural reimagining using Nipsey’s voice over a Guayla
beat was a powerful release for me. I wondered if this reconfiguration of “Mercy” was something beyond my reckoning with the dark despair associated with his untimely
death in the hands of another Black youth? Weighing the
complexities of my process as an African American, a
South Central native, a musician and now aspiring academic, I confronted the ethics and scholarly implications
of my remix. While I partly questioned the legalities of my
work and whether I needed to seek approval from the Asghedom estate, Nipsey’s partner Lauren London, and his
co-writers and featured vocalist Barthe, I began to see the
marrying of Nipsey’s vocals to Tigrinya music as a unique
opening, an unorthodox participant observation. “Finally,
as we ethnomusicologists become more confident in our
disciplinary methods and with our role as fieldworkers, we
are moving from a concern about the potential negative
impact on those we study and toward active advocacy for
those same individuals and their communities” (Cooley
2008). This remixing of disparate ethnic music spaces in
the digital domain—the rap verses of a half Eritrean MC
merged with my programmed Guayla interpretation reminiscent of a digitized Bereket Mengisteab track—became
an ethnographic re-negotiation of sorts, a field recontextualization.
[continued on next page]
17
Nipsey Hussle [continued from previous page]
In closing, I acknowledge Guayla music as much more expansive and deserving than this brief analysis could ever
convey. And the life of Ermias “Nipsey Hussle” Asghedom
is much more sacred than this writer’s fragmented theorizing could ever hope to take into account. However,
ethnographic research on any musical artform demands
what Cooley and Barz deem an “embrace of multiple
realities” (Cooley 2008). Just as Nipsey was a beloved
actualization of African American and Eritrean ancestry,
a product of his family, environment and so much more,
his legacy allowed me room to see “how researchers’
positionality shapes ethnographic observations” (Musante
2015). Accordingly, this preliminary writing simply aspires
to parallel disjointed sources in the construction of meaning. Watching the final moments of the Staples Center
memorial home video that Nipsey’s family shot in Asmara,
Eritrea, I covet the parting visual of the young rapper in
the rear seat of a car over a background soundtrack of
Tigrinya music. There it is! These seven seconds of symbolic media juncture are just enough evidential data of the
possible. Eritrean priest Father Thomas Uwal’s Tigrinyan
prayer, the high-pitched emotive elilta screams in the audience, and the blue, red and green Eritrean emblem on
the closed casket at the memorial, interspersed with the
occasional n-word epithet, a sermonette by the Honorable
Louis Farrakhan and a performance by Stevie Wonder,
were not randomized and conflicting cultural metaphors.
Perhaps for some of us they were, in fact, the embodiment of our work: intersectional and reimagined domains
as sites of transformative ethnography.
Works Cited
Abraham, Tedros. 2016. “Traditional Music in Eritrea.”
In-house East Africa. Music in Africa. Accessed May 12,
2020. https://www.musicinafrica.net/magazine/traditionalmusic-eritrea.
Broughton, Simon, Mark Ellingham, David Muddyman,
and Richard Trillo. 1997. World Music: The Rough Guide.
Desmond, Matthew. 2014. “Relational Ethnography.”
Theory and Society 43 (5): 547-579.
Kimberlin, Cynthia. T. 2000. “Eritrea.” In The New Grove
Dictionary of Music and Musicians. Edited by Stanley Sadie and John Tyrrell, 2nd ed. London, UK: Macmillan.
Matzke, Christine. 2008. “The Asmara Theatre Association: 1961-74, Mahber Teyatr Asmera.” In African Theatre Companies, edited by Femi Osofisan, James Morel
Gibbs, Martin Banham, and James Gibbs, 62-81. Oxford:
James Currey.
Musante, Kathleen. 2015. “Participant Observation.” In
Handbook of Methods in Cultural Anthropology. Edited
by Bernard H. Russell, 251-292. Lanham, MD: Altamira
Press.
“Nipsey Hussle Honored in Funeral Service at Staples
Center.” 2019. NBC News. Accessed May 29, 2020.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=palUDyGkyeU.
Rena, Ravinder. 2009. “Role of Musical Songs in the
Independence Struggle of Eritrean People.” International
Journal of Human Development and Information System 2
(1 & 2): 93-104.
Stone, Ruth M., ed. 2008. The Garland Handbook of African Music, 2nd ed. NY & Oxford: Routledge.
Andemariam, Senai Woldeab. 2019. “Eritrea: Modern
and Contemporary Performance Practice.” In The SAGE
International Encyclopedia of Music and Culture, edited by
Janet Sturman, 821823. Vol. 2. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE
Reference. Gale eBooks. Accessed May 13, 2020.
Broughton, Simon, Mark Ellingham, Jon Lusk, and
Duncan Clark. 2006. The Rough Guide to World Music.
London: Rough Guides.
Cooley, Timothy J. and Gregory Barz. 2008. “Casting Shadows: Fieldwork is Dead! Long Live Fieldwork!
Introduction.” Shadows in the Field: New Perspectives for
Fieldwork, edited by Timothy Cooley and Gregory Barz,
3-24. New York: Oxford University Press.
Sandoval, Chela, and Guisela Latorre. 2008. “Chicana/o
Artivism: Judy Baca’s Digital Work ith Youth of Color.” In
Learning Race and Ethnicity: Youth and Digital Media,
edited by Anna Everett, The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation Series on Digital Media and Learning,
81–108. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Abbonizio, Isabella. 2019. “Eritrea: History, Culture, and
Geography of Music.” In The SAGE International Encyclopedia of Music and Culture, Vol 2, edited by Janet Sturman, 819-821. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Reference.
Bernal, Victoria. 2005. “Eritrea On-Line: Diaspora, Cyberspace, and the Public Sphere.” American Ethnologist 32
(4): 660-675.
London: The Rough Guides.
Discography
Nipsey Hussle, vocalist. 2018. Victory Lap. All Money In
No Money Out / Atlantic Records CD 565429-2.
Nipsey Hussle, vocalist. 2016. Slauson Boy 2. All Money
In No Money Out CDR Unknown.
Nipsey Hussle, vocalist. 2013. DJ Drama Presents…
Crenshaw. Mixtaples.com CDR 142073.
Nipsey Hussle, vocalist. 2011. The Marathon Continues.
All Money In No Money Out CDR Unknown.
Nipsey Hussle, vocalist. 2005. Slauson Boy Vol. 2. Slauson Boy Records CDR 6 34479 21877 4.
18
A Virtual Return to a Familiar Field: Ethnographic Endeavors During America’s
Pandemic Response
Alec Norkey, UCLA
Ethnographic research has historically been structured
by an ethnographer proceeding into “the field,” building
relationships with community members likely hitherto
unknown, and conducting a combination of research
methods—such as participant-observation and interviews—to shed light on an “Other” world. In my case,
however, I am lucky enough to come from and return to
a world of which I can, to an extent, claim membership:
the world of Western art music, particularly through the
eyes of an aspiring musician. Yet the “field” that I am
most acquainted with (and most concerned with, at the
moment) is not an orchestra, music venue, or non-profit
organization. It is instead the realm of higher education:
the “school of music,” the college, the conservatory, the
type of institution through which I have honed my craft
and established myself as a burgeoning professional. It
is the place where—having spent so much time, energy,
and long hours practicing and rehearsing—I have made
numerous, long-lasting friendships with people with whom
I have collaborated, performed, suffered, and celebrated.
In this reflection, I interview a pre-established friend and
colleague as part of a field site composed of, among other
things, institutions, funding structures, bodily expression,
and musical aspirations. Rather than venturing towards an
imagined Other, I instead revisit an imagined Self.
The dichotomies historically associated with the Other/
Self binary have themselves been contested in ethnomusicological scholarship. Deborah Wong, in her reflections
on taiko and performative ethnography, advocates for a
consideration of authoethnography as critical engagement
with ethnographic practice (Wong 2008, 77). Here, reflexive writing offers an avenue for demonstrating the fragility
of dualisms oft referred to—such as emic/etic, insider/outsider, and researcher/informant—and the assumed power
dynamics such categories tend to evoke. In interviewing
friends from a past life, how might previous relationships
coincide with different premises, particularly those of an
ethnographer? As my own experience shapes the conceptualization and consequent interaction with my “new” informants, internal reflection may shed light on how and why
such dynamic, contradictory relationships may play out.
How might this problematization of the Other/Self dichotomy play out exactly? Planning and conducting interviews
can incite a host of emotions, depending on the circumstances. As for myself—especially since the government
lockdown in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic—I was
incredibly excited for the blissful (albeit virtual) reunion
with musical friends with whom I’ve performed and
intensely collaborated. Being cooped up in my apartment for about a month and a half straight, I was eager to
reconnect. Yet Wong mentions the creation of a new relationship when one does ethnography: “the ethnographer
19
is always an outsider. Creating an ethnography of even a
close family member would presumably entail crafting a
new relationship beyond that of daughter or sister” (Wong
2008, 82).
Thus—despite anticipating comfort and familiarity—I was
a little nervous, as interviewing my friends and colleagues
seemed to invite a potentially uncomfortable dynamic colored by a foreign formality and (perhaps unnecessary?)
professional expectation. Additionally, such interviews
were my first ones that were to take place over Facetime
and/or Zoom; consequently, I wasn’t sure what the “feel”
would be, how conversations would flow, or if I would
encounter any technical challenges. Therefore, I decided
that pursuing conversational interviews—similar to the
“unstructured interview” described by Fina (2019, 156)—
was most flexible in balancing not only my expectations
but also my anxieties.
My first interview took place on May 1st, 2020, at 2:30 pm
PT. Difference in place prompted me to be mindful of the
time, as my first interviewee lived on the east coast—Boston, specifically, with a 3-hour time difference. Utilizing
Facetime, we greeted each other with as much excitement as could be conveyed through an LED screen. Despite the lack of physical presence, the nicety of a hug, or
the space and ambience of a local café, I was nevertheless relieved and happy to approach my friend “Z” (actual
name is not disclosed) not only as someone with whom to
“catch up” or “spill tea,” but also as a fellow conservatorytrained musician with whom to share and receive knowledge. These roles, of course, often conflated with each
other “in practice” (i.e. through my own lived experience),
and their separation is perhaps more allusive towards an
ethnographic, theoretical proclivity.
I began by asking Z about her experience as a student
finishing the post-master’s fellowship program at Berklee
College. We quickly arrived at the topic of music schools’
responses to the COVID-19 pandemic. Our observations
were, I think, as expected: like almost every other sector
in the US economy, music schools were losing money
and halting certain operations such as performances,
rehearsals, and private lessons. Although in-person activities were suspended, classes were continuing online,
semesters were finishing, and—despite the cancellation of
degree recitals—students were graduating. The number
of webinars, unsurprisingly, exploded as well. Professional
development webinars tailored towards current students
and alumni, especially, were of primary interest for Z (I’m
guessing for almost all other students as well, considering
the pandemic response’s effect on many musicians’ opportunities to perform live).
[continued on next page]
A Virtual Return [continued from previous page]
We moved to the broader topic of life as a music-student-in-transition-to-music-professional. As a classically
trained musician who has navigated the gigging world, I
was keenly aware of the significant impact the pandemic
had—and continues to have—on performing musicians’
livelihoods, livelihoods that can already entail an economic precariousness difficult to contend with. As mentioned
before, the college was providing professional support through webinars; owing to the size and amount of
resources dedicated to the Berklee Career Center, I can
imagine that webinars were only the tip of the iceberg. Yet
all of Z’s performance gigs were indeed cancelled; luckily,
her fellowship came through and allowed her to remain
economically settled. However, she informed me that she
was planning to move, as she didn’t know if she would be
able to pay rent come fall.
Reflecting on this interview, the notion of space and place
seems to me of primary consideration (Gupta and Ferguson 1997). How might the social and cultural practices
often experienced by conservatory students be radically
changed if the conservatory space is unavailable? Could
such experiences even be possible? A preliminary answer
is that there seems to have been attempts to fill such a
void, owing to, among other things, the utilization of video
conferencing to continue classes and edited ensemble
recordings (Shelbie Rassler’s video is one such example;
see Smith 2020). Further ethnographic investigation on
the degree to which physical spaces constitute a necessary ingredient to social the dynamics of music conservatory life seems opportune now; in fact, for future ethnographic work on the conservatory, it may be unavoidable.
Of course, this extends to interviews and the spaces in
which they occur. While video conferencing is an incredibly convenient substitute, it does not provoke the same
feeling as when an interview occurs in tangible space.
Ethnography and theorization on the differences and similarities between video interviews and in-person interviews
may prove useful in this time of quarantine.
The role of the conservatory and higher education also
demands a deeper understanding. Henry Kingsbury’s
1988 ethnography details a New England conservatory,
elaborating on aspects of ritual, social cohesion, and
culture as developed by notable social theorists such as
Clifford Geertz and Emile Durkheim. The circumstances
of today, however, insist that the ethnographer consider
a conservatory not only as Kingsbury did—a nexus of interpersonal power dynamics, social positionality, teacherstudent dyads, and recitals-as-social-ritual—but also as
an institution that has seen considerable expansion over
the last several decades, particularly in terms of administration, tuition costs, and career support. Additionally,
while acknowledging the social dynamics, prestige, and
power often imbricated in music making within the conservatory (an extreme example: while at Boston Conserva-
tory, I was witness to the sacking of a former conductor
due to abuse allegations; see Gay and Lazar 2017), I also
recognize the importance in explicating the role of music
as meaningful to students and faculty in either reinforcing
or contesting conditions of the status quo. In light of social
dynamics, music as meaningful, processes of power and
prestige, and capitalism’s driving force, I ask the following: taken as a whole, what is the field in which one
does ethnography? Given that the central place of traditional fieldwork, the physical field, has been necessarily
suspended, it seems most prudent to consider not the
conservatory as a contained site of cultural space, but as
a nexus for social relations, contestations, and processes.
At this juncture, Matthew Desmond’s notion of “relational
ethnography” proves useful in posing alternative methods
of inquiry that do not necessitate a physical place in the
same way traditional, “substantialist” ethnography does
(Desmond 2014).
In this short reflection, I wanted to “show” rather than
“tell,” to highlight the lived experience of doing ethnography that will continue to inform my interpretations and
conclusions (Wong 2008, 85). From facing challenges
ushered by a pandemic to managing new ethnographic
relationships with old friends, I hope that, by offering a
viewpoint of immersion in doing ethnography, I’ve not
only demonstrated the frailty of the field we now currently
face, but have also illustrated the need to consider the
contingent nature of ethnographic fieldwork in general (as
noted, the COVID-19 pandemic has suspended realities
of the everyday that have hitherto been taken for granted).
While my venture back to the conservatory via ethnography presents significant challenges, they cannot overpower the excitement and anticipation of return to the familiar,
to the training grounds of my professional trade, that world
of nerves, success, struggle, and intrigue.
Works Cited
Desmond, Matthew. 2014. ‘Relational Ethnography.’
Theory and Society 43 (5): 547-79.
Fina, Anna de. 2019. ‘The Ethnographic Interview.’ In The
Routledge Handbook of Linguistic Ethnography, edited by
Karen Tusting, 154-67. London: Routledge Handbooks
Online.
Gay, Malcolm and Kay Lazar. 2017. “Three Schools Sever
Ties with Influential Musician Amid Abuse Allegations.”
Metro. The Boston Globe. Last modified December 13,
2017. Accessed June 12, 2020. https://www3.bostonglobe.com/metro/2017/12/13/three-schools-sever-tieswith-influential-conductor-musician-amid-abuse-allegations/hpvSvdLvaMwz8TwvKtlt2L/story.html?arc404=true
............................................
20
.[continued on next page].
A Virtual Return [continued from previous page]
Gupta, Akhil, and James Ferguson. 1997. “Beyond “Culture”: Space, Identity, and the Politics of Difference.” In
Culture, Power, Place, edited by Akhil Gupta and James
Ferguson, 33-51. Durham: Duke University Press.
Inspiration for Music Makers. Berklee Online. https://
online.berklee.edu/takenote/how-berklee-online-studentshelbie-rassler-created-the-viral-what-the-world-needsnow-video/.
Kingsbury, Henry. 1988. Music, Talent, and Performance:
A Conservatory Cultural System. Philadelphia: Temple
University Press.
Wong, Deborah Anne. 2008. “Moving: From Performance
to Performative Ethnography and Back Again.” In Shadows in the Field: New Perspectives for Fieldwork in Ethnomusicology, edited by Timothy J. Cooley and Gregory F.
Barz, 2nd ed., 76-89. New York: Oxford University Press.
Smith, Talia. 2020. “How Student Shelbie Rassler Created
the Viral “What the World Needs Now” Video.” TakeNote:
From Being Real to Being Virtual: Musical and Cultural Space of Bulgaria
Tingting Tang, UCLA
In writing up my ethnographic activity experience in Bulgarian folk music, I would like to incorporate three aspects
into this ethnographic blog. These aspects, especially
Part II and Part III, represent the different experiences of
my research, before and after, respectively, the outbreak
of COVID-19. First, I will layout a general background
and a brief literature review as far as my research interest in this topic. I will touch on how I became interested
in learning about Bulgarian folk music and what my areas
of interest are. Then I will cite two of my favorite stories
that had to do with Bulgarian music before the pandemic
started. Lastly, I will write up a vignette to share my choir
experience after moving to remote rehearsal, which only
occurred after the onset of the pandemic.
I. Research Interest – General Background
It was with full curiosity when I walked into a Bulgarian
ensemble classroom for the first time in early 2019. Now
as a singer of this group for nearly two years, I am deeply
attracted by the unique “cultural space.” The ensemble
is led by a Bulgarian couple: Prof. Ivan Varimezov is
a well-known professional gaidari musician, and Prof.
Tzvetanka is a famous Bulgarian folkloric soprano. They
both took jobs with Pazardzhhik’s professional ensemble
of folk song and dance: Ivan conducted the orchestra and
Tzvetanka the choir. Since 2001, Tzvetanka has been a
master artist-in-residence in the UCLA ethnomusicology
department, where she teaches Balkan singing technique and conducts the UCLA Bulgarian women’s choir
Superdevojche. As I interacted more with the ensemble,
I became more and more interested in learning about the
history of Bulgarian music and in learning about Bulgarian music within various contexts. Below I will present a
historic overview to lay out a general background of my
topics of interests.
Folk music of Eastern Europe came to international attention beginning in the 1960s. Bulgarian folk music, with
its uneven rhythms, highly ornamented singing style, and
exotic-looking instruments, such as the goatskin bagpipe,
proved especially attractive to Western ears. Ethnomusicologists in and outside of Europe have also shown
interest in the Bulgarian folk tradition. The purpose of this
literature review is to write a brief historiography of the
important achievements in research and foci of Bulgarian
folk song from the 1890s to 2015 in the field of ethnomusicology, and to look at potential research directions for the
future.
The earliest English-language research of Bulgarian
music/song focused on musical features. In 1889, a short
article introducing the notes system of Bulgarian music
had already been published in The Musical Times and
Singing Class Circular. Later, Bulgarian-American composer and ethnomusicologist Boris A. Kremenliev (1956)
categorized Bulgarian folk songs into three main types
(i.e. songs of everyday experience, songs of the supernatural, and songs of the past), in the context of local traditional cultures. As a native ethnomusicologist, Kremenliev
maintained that folk music genres should be classified not
simply following the Western classification rules, but by
the social function and events of the song.
One of the most famous Bulgarian music ethnomusicologists in the world, Timothy Rice (1945- ), published his first
article “Aspects of Bulgarian Musical Thought,” in 1980.
Rice argued that the concept of music and the distinction
between music and song were challenged by the Bulgarian culture, since “none of these taxonomies is isomorphic
with the Western category” (Rice 1980). By presenting
his personal field experience in learning Bulgarian gaida
(bagpipe), Rice arrived at a new understanding that learning the real tradition might subvert many of the western
disciplines, because those disciplines were established on
local philosophical footings (Rice 1995). Under control of
the Bulgarian communist government, with its hierarchies
of power, from 1944 to 1989, the metaphors and significance of music as art shifted into a symbol of nationalism
and patriotism (Rice 2001)
[continued on next pageI]
21
Being Virtual [continued from previous page]
In the post-communist period (after 1989), due to media deregulation, new music genres emerged, such as
American-influenced rock, popfolk/novfolk (newly composed folk music), and chalga (a genre dominated by
Romani musicians). Folk music as the symbolic “state”
art of Bulgarian nationalism then attenuated. At that point,
an idea of pursuing “cultural purity and authenticity” was
raised by the cultural elite: Popfolk, bearing some of the
Balkan heritage, has been criticized by the “cultural elites”
as “cheap” and “vulgar”; chalga, associated with Romani
culture, has been considered as “simply not from our
world” (Rice 2002).
we still have the Bulgarian ensemble. She asked Tzetze
to give her a copy of our notation, so she could sing with
us. Her enthusiasm made everyone in the classroom feel
as if we were all professional Bulgarian musicians. Her
singing was a slight part of the ensemble, yet her influence seemed tremendous. It was in that moment and in
that space, that everybody seemed to be brought back
into the historical context of our department.
III. “The New Method!”
Bulgarian folk music has undergone a transformation from
music classification and analysis of musical features to
emphasizing the significance of music in a specific historical context. Undoubtedly, cultural changes will remain a
focus of ethnomusicology.
II. Two Stories to Share
I want to share two of my favorite stories I encountered
while at the UCLA Balkan Ensemble.
One night while practicing at the Balkan Ensemble, a
young lady walked into the classroom, asking if we were
practicing Bulgarian music. It turned out that the young
lady was born in the U.S. and grew up in Bulgaria. She’s
a first-year undergraduate student at UCLA. Once she
heard about the ensemble from friends, she couldn’t wait
to come to check it out in person. From her eyes and
tone, it was quite apparent that she was so excited to find
her homeland’s melody in the U.S. She had a delightful
chat with the instructor Tzetze,* who was super excited to
be speaking native Bulgarian with her. Then, Tzetze introduced her to each and every member’s name and native
county. She had no idea there were so many Bulgarians
in the choir. After the rehearsal, Tzetze asked her if she
liked the ensemble. And, right there on spot, Tzetze offered that the student was more than welcome to join the
ensemble. It was at a point such as this, at this location,
that the ensemble became a carrier of nostalgia, and a
way for people to share anything Bulgarian.
With an almost brand-new yoga mat still lying near my
bed after doing some relaxing moves on the floor to cheer
myself up, I was on my way to the closet to get a piece
of Ricola, an original herb cough drop. I just had my first
virtual class of spring 2020 over Zoom earlier in the day,
an experience that many of us had not experienced too
frequently in the past. Not needing to wear shoes in my
bedroom, I had already put away my socks. I didn’t even
have any use for my backpack…. So many little details
have changed for us nowadays as we adjust to learning
over Zoom, meeting our professors over Zoom, discussing coursework with classmates over Zoom, and attending
academic seminars and professional presentations over
Zoom.
I was getting the cough drop because I was getting ready
to sing in my first-ever Zoom session of my World Music
Specializations: Music of Balkans – Choir class. Having
enrolled in this class for the past year and a half, I was
used to meeting Professor Tzvetanka Varimezova and
her husband Ivan Varimezov every Monday night when
classes were in normal sessions. Now for the first time, I
didn’t know what to do for an ensemble class that was to
be given entirely online.
Standing on my yoga mat, I was ready to enter the Zoom
meeting room at the scheduled start time, when I found
that the room was not accessible. It turned out that
Professor Tzvetanka Varimezova had some technical
difficulties with using Zoom. It didn’t take her and her TA
too long to get the thing up and running though. “Wow,
first time here online!” everybody all seemed to say, or to
at least feel it the same way. Back in the good old times,
we used to sing together. Now when we sang together,
at least when we tried to do the same thing online, we
quickly came to realize that Zoom is not super friendly
with our sing-together routine. Everyone’s sound seemed
to mingle together, without enabling us to be able to tell
who was singing what. I could tell, even when everyone’s
face was now just a moving image inside of a fixed frame,
that people were getting frustrated with this new method
of course delivery.
Another night, an old couple came into the classroom
through the back door. The lady was in her late 80s, and
in a wheelchair that her husband had to help her with.
They were so quiet that almost nobody noticed when they
came in. They remained quiet until our break, when the
lady came up to us and told us her stories. It turned out
that she was a UCLA graduate in ethnomusicology and
had been a member of the Bulgarian ensemble many
years ago. She wanted to find memories from her school
years. So, she called our department and found out that
But, wait… after a while, someone said, “What if we sing
one by one instead of singing all at the same time?” We
tried. Wow, what a nice difference,
[continued on next page]
*
Prof. Tzvetanka prefers her students and friends
call her “Tzetze”. As she explains, “Tzetze” is a more personalized name for Tzvetanka.
22
Being Virtual [continued from previous page]
I wanted to share these two different experiences because I had been thinking about the fact that for the
Bulgarian ensemble, the technical support provided by
the latest technology is making remote rehearsal possible
for us in difficult times. At present, remote technology can
only solve the synchronization of time, but cannot realize
the synchronization of space. The once free and open
cultural space had to become a closed space during the
pandemic.
as now we were able to tell who was singing what. It
meant that we needed to take turns to sing, which meant
we needed to be more patient. But, everyone seemed to
agree with proceeding with such a new method to handle
things a bit differently. At the end of the class, it felt like
this new method actually worked.
Interestingly, I had my feet on my yoga mat the entire
time. I had a cup of ice-cold coke right beside my laptop – one luxury that I would otherwise not have if I were
singing in the classroom. And, I was only 8 steps from the
restroom, so I was more efficient when it comes to the
break times.
Works Cited
Kremenliev, Boris A. 1956. “Types of Bulgarian Folk
Songs.” The Slavonic and East European Review 34, no.
83: 355-76.
A new system, a new way of doing things, new things being learned and improved…. I am grateful to be in such a
group because we are all adaptable. We are still learning
during these “unprecedented times.” We are still a strong
group with energy and synergy. Well, Zoom is helping out
of course, but it is our team spirit that keeps us excited
and united.
Rice, Timothy. 1980. “Aspects of Bulgarian Musical
Thought.” Yearbook of the International Folk Music Council 12: 43-66.
———. 1995. “Understanding and Producing the Variability of Oral Tradition: Learning from a Bulgarian Bagpiper.”
The Journal of American Folklore 108 (429): 266-76.
We cannot really wait to meet each other in person again,
but of course we will be patient and be waiting for that
day. Health is a priority and not meeting each other during this chaos is a way to respect our loved ones. When
we eventually return to our lives and studies, I am sure
that all of us will be thrilled at how beautiful life is and
how lucky we are to be able to appreciate the wonders of
music.
———. 2001. “Reflections on Music and Meaning: Metaphor, Signification and Control in the Bulgarian Case.”
British Journal of Ethnomusicology 10 (1): 19-38.
———. 2002. “Bulgaria or Chalgaria: The Attenuation of
Bulgarian Nationalism in a Mass-Mediated Popular Music.” Yearbook for Traditional Music 34: 25-46.
#MetallicaMondays
Ciera Ott, UCLA
Scrolling through YouTube one Monday evening, a
livestream of a previously recorded Metallica concert
was recommended to me through YouTube’s automated
recommendation system. I opened the link in a new tab
to listen (as background music) as I searched for something else to watch, but within a few songs I noticed the
“greatest hitness” of the playlist and decided to give the
livestream my full attention and observe the chat box as
it updated itself in real time. The concert I was watching
was recorded on May 31st, 2015, at a festival in Munich,
Germany.* The hits Metallica’s fifty-year-old band members were performing were twenty-five to thirty years old
themselves; my research, meanwhile, centers on aging in
and around popular music. I am interested in how the aging process affects not only performers, but also the audience’s reception of aged performers, with special attention
given to lifelong fans who have aged with their favorite
performers. I planned to conduct ethnographic interviews
*
Metallica, “Metallica: Live in Munich, Germany May 31, 2015,” 20 April 2020, video 2:16:30, https://www.
youtube.com/watch?v=rt0DC7PFmMs.
23
with elderly fans, but COVID-19 struck and began devastating elderly communities before I was able to establish
any sort of relationship with interlocutors. Through observing this livestream, I confirmed the necessity of personalized interviews within my larger research project, and got
a sense of how little Metallica’s middle-agedness mattered to this audience, as well as a general sense in which
YouTube livestreams can be used for ethnography. In the
following post, I will first describe YouTube as a platform
for live streaming and comment on advantages and
disadvantages for researchers. Then I will conclude with
a discussion of how my observation of a live-streamed
Metallica concert aided my research project.
YouTube Livestreams
Live streaming, which has steadily gained popularity on
various social media platforms, is now even more prominent in quarantine as it becomes a surrogate for live connection. On YouTube livestreams, anyone can drop in at
any time and comment in real time. [continued on next page]
#MetallicaMondays [continued from previous page]
The livestream I observed is a previously recorded performance which is undoubtedly advantageous for sound
quality, but it creates several differences from a true live
performance. First, a livestream audience member is
physically isolated. Second, their view of the concert is
limited to what the edited video footage chooses to show
them. Third, the audio is mixed to privilege an enjoyable
musical experience which, at the very least, removes what
the editors have deemed superfluous audience noise.
A livestream viewer has a better view of the band and
will only sometimes see and hear the live audience; the
recording keeps the recorded musicians and audience
divided even though their energy feeds one another. Additionally, the livestream viewer gets to choose how much
energy they will take from either group as they watch the
recording, as well as how much energy they choose to
contribute to the communal viewing experience in the
chat.
YouTube does not keep a record of how many viewers a
livestream has at any given time. User Jimmy J writes in
the chat at approximately 14:10, “I seriously can’t believe 20,000 people are watching this at the Same [sic]
time.,” and since I did not think to record the number of
participants in relation to certain time stamps or songs, I
am at the mercy of finding comments like these by sifting
through the chat accompanying the posted livestream
if I want to estimate participant numbers. Further, there
are no available lists of users who are tuned into the
livestream. This removes the ability to survey and make
generalizations about who the people watching are and
only the usernames of the viewers who choose to participate in the chat are available.
sense of how many people have viewed the video, since
the “views” counter is updated in real time, but this does
not include the number of viewers during the livestream or
information about which parts of the video were watched.
Total number of views can be used to calculate what percentage of viewers participated in the comments section,
liked, or disliked the video, but again, user participation
in any of these activities is not a given. Comments below
the video, post-stream, are likely to be more reflective and
more well thought out than what is found in a livestream
chat, but they are usually still general sentiments about
the band or overall performance, though sometimes
the commenter will provide a timestamp or explicitly
say which song or part of the video they are responding to. Metallica’s account has the top comment, which
provides timestamps for each song, making it easy for
post-livestream viewers to jump to their favorite songs
in the video. YouTube gives viewers the option to click
on a commenter’s username and profile picture, so the
researcher has a better chance of learning more about the
commenter. Still, the majority of usernames are linked to
Google accounts, not active YouTube channels, meaning
information rarely goes beyond gaining a vague sense of
other videos the user likes, at best.
“Metallica: Live in Munich, Germany - May 31, 2015,”
Live Streamed April 20, 2020
For observations based on reception, the only option is
to observe the responses posted in the chat, which, for
this livestream, are mainly people saying where they are
tuning in from, showing excitement about the band or
enthusiasm for the current song, and a barrage of “sign of
the horns” emojis. Unfortunately, these types of comments
do not lend themselves to much analysis or scrutiny. They
can help fill in the gaps of who some of the viewers are
when they say where they are from, but YouTube does not
offer tools to help viewers (or researchers) see who the
viewers are, when they tune in, or how long they watch,
and it does not provide information to track either the
percentage of viewers participating in the chat or fluctuations in volume of chat comments. However, researchers
do benefit when channel operators choose to include the
live chat with the upload of the livestream because this
provides a record of viewer responses that remain synced
to the video.
Reposting the livestream as a normal YouTube video adds
the option for viewers to comment after the live event.
This offers benefits and drawbacks when doing reception
analysis. As a regular video, researchers can get a better
Metallica’s Youtube channel started a weekly #MetallicaMondays series on March 23, 2020, soon after the
US’s broadly mandated stay-at-home orders, where they
livestream a past-recorded concert every Monday to help
fans stay connected while social distancing. Additionally,
all livestreams have doubled as fundraisers for the band’s
All Within My Hands Foundation, which distributes funds
to various local and national charities. Always airing at
5 p.m. PST, the livestreams privilege time zones in the
Western Hemisphere, and this was reflected in the chat
with a large volume of users saying they were watching
from Brazil, Argentina, and Chile (US users rarely announce their home country or state to a global audience).
#MetallicaMondays are uploaded as regular YouTube
videos after the streaming is over, allowing people to
watch afterwards and comment after the fact. As of May
5, 2020, the posted video had 722,400 views, 860 comments (roughly .12% of viewers commented), 25,000 likes
and a mere 377 dislikes. The most liked and responded-to
comments simply praise the setlist.
A performance such as this one, where a band plays
their hits from twenty to thirty years earlier, offers ample
opportunity for viewers to make comparisons if they feel a
comparison is to be made. The fact that the band receives
so much praise and there is no mention of their age or
past performances suggests that the viewers are satisfied with how they are performing their old hits. A lack of
backhanded comments such as
[continued on next page]
24
#MetallicaMondays [continued from previous page]
“they sound good… for a bunch of guys in their fifties,” for
example, may imply that viewers did not expect Metallica
to sound different than they did in the 1980s and 1990s.
This sort of negative reasoning is not unique to digital observation, but it is strengthened when the researcher has
access to all commentary. At a live performance, I could
not have possibly heard or comprehended the thousands
of bits of feedback presented in the live chat and I could
not have surveyed 860 people after the show for more
detailed comments. I can, however, confidently say that
the age of the performers was not a major consideration
for thousands of digital audience members.
Does the lack of criticism or comparisons imply that the
band sounds as good as they did thirty years ago? Thrash
metal has been slow to receive critical aesthetic or artistic
acclaim, but it is undeniably physically demanding. Metallica’s ability to keep up with their younger selves is an
age-defying skill and talent that may be lost on a younger
crowd. I cannot look at a sea of usernames and guess at
the viewers’ ages as easily as I could by visually scanning the audience at a live show, meaning it is difficult to
directly address my primary research question regarding
the reception of aged performers by a similarly aged audience.
A digital platform, such as YouTube, assumes a younger
average viewer age and although this does not benefit
my most privileged research question, I can still observe
the reception of aging musicians from the perspective of
a younger, possibly more judgmental or ageist, crowd.
Younger fans may prioritize original album recordings
over previous live performances, especially if they are
from a part of the world Metallica does not typically tour
or they were born after the band’s heyday album tours.
Technologies such as live streaming on YouTube allow researchers to continue to do meaningful participant observation so long as they attend to the complexities of access
and viewer participation. To continue my project, I need
to conduct interviews directly asking older fans about
their experience of aged performers. From this participant observer experience, I have learned that my specific
research question regarding aging musicians is perhaps
irrelevant to Metallica’s younger fans in 2020.
Zooming in on the Big Island of Hawaiʻi
Delaney Miranda Yuko Ross, UCLA
It is 5:20pm on a partly cloudy evening in Kona. I am sitting cross-legged on my childhood bed. It’s fairly cool for
the late afternoon on the Big Island, with clouds providing their nice and usual cover. Despite the cool breeze
and ceiling fan turned on, I notice sweat collecting on
the back of my knees. I am waiting for an interlocutor
to join a Zoom meeting I started five minutes ago. I am
extremely anxious. This is not the fieldwork environment
I was expecting. I was not expecting to be sitting on my
bed. I was not expecting to be staring at myself in a Zoom
window. I was not even expecting to be in Hawaiʻi at this
point. Things changed rapidly in March, during the “unprecedented times” of the novel coronavirus. As I sit here
waiting for my first ethnographic interview to begin, my
mind is racing with all the expectations I had as an ethnomusicologist beginning to go into the field. I imagined
myself equipped with my small notebook, DSLR camera,
and Zoom H2N Handy recorder, stepping out into my field
site, the summit of Mauna Kea, very nervous but mostly
excited! I would approach strangers, search for insight,
interview interlocutors, observe and participate in on-site
rituals, engage in the elusive “deep hanging out” ethnomusicologists have described! Instead, I am on my bed,
sitting in my childhood home, sweat in my knee pits. This
is not the deep hanging out I was promised.
rent project examines how music plays a role in the construction of the contemporary Hawaiian identity. In order to
explore this, I am building upon existing literature (Lewis
1984; Stillman 2009, 2011) and am utilizing the current
land rights struggle surrounding the construction of the
Thirty Meter Telescope (TMT) on the summit of Mauna
Kea on my home island (Van Dyke 2019). This essay
describes an interview I had recently with Sarah, a native
Hawaiian friend. Constructing one’s identity in Hawaiʻi
requires a vast web of historical and deeply integrated
knowledge of the islands. The Kingdom of Hawaiʻi was
overthrown by the US in 1893, and became the fiftieth
state in 1959. Today, those with native Hawaiian ancestry
are engaging with a unique contemporary Hawaiian culture. While most native Hawaiians are mixed race, claiming the ethnic Hawaiian identity is exclusive and requires
proof of Hawaiian blood. For example, Kamehameha
schools, a primary and secondary institution with three
main campuses and over five thousand students, require
proof of Hawaiian ancestry upon admission (the lengthy
application includes several forms and verification from
the Hoʻoulu Hawaiian Verification Services Data Center).
Being ethnically Hawaiian in Hawaiʻi is indisputably a
source of pride. My interviewee Sarah remarks:
I will always say I am Hawaiian, Chinese, Caucasian.
Of course biologically, I’m more Caucasian than Chinese or Hawaiian. But I will always say it that way:
Hawaiian, Chinese, Caucasian.
[continued on next page]
Growing up mixed race in Kona, and struggling with my
own identity, my research thus far has been focused on
multiculturalism and identity in the Pacific region. My cur-
25
Zooming In [continued from previous page]
I’m very fortunate, I’ve got the bloodline that I can tie
back to being here before Westerners. I think that’s a
huge component [of being Hawaiian]. Being Hawaiian to me means valuing that tradition and that culture.
Connecting, and valuing the connection to land, to
place, to family and people.
Sarah was born in Washington State after her mother
moved there to attend university. However, her mother
moved Sarah and her older sister back to Hawaiʻi when
Sarah was only two years old. The family then moved to
Oahu, where Sarah spent her childhood, and graduated
from Kamehameha. Sarah is proud of her Hawaiian roots,
but able to admit that growing up in the late seventies and
eighties, she did not participate in Hawaiian culture, noting
instead that she grew up “very Caucasian.” She remarked
that her great-grandparents spoke Hawaiian, but did not
teach the language to her grandparents. She said they
were of “that generation where you just didn’t do it at
home,” in order to integrate better into society.
Nowadays, Hawaiian history is something all elementary
school students take in Hawaiʻi. We are all informed of the
overthrow of the monarchy, the oligarchy of white American businessmen who took over, and finally statehood.
What I did not learn as a fourth grader, however, was that
this curriculum is relatively new. While talking with my
mom the other day, a Hawaiʻi-born and raised Japanese
woman, she admitted that she did not learn any Hawaiian
history in school. It wasn’t until law school that she even
learned that the Hawaiian kingdom was overthrown.
Hawaiian identity in Hawaiʻi drastically changed in the
second half of the twentieth century. The New Hawaiian
Renaissance began in the 1970s and involved a host of
reclamation projects for Hawaiian people, most notably,
the reclamation of Hawaiian music. Hawaiian music was
deeply embedded in tourism, an industry that exponentially grew in the first half of the twentieth century. By the
1940s, “Hawaiian” music was popular throughout the
mainland US. This genre is now known as hapa haole.
These songs were all in English and often used popular
dance beats like ragtime, jazz, blues, and foxtrot with
lyrical mock-Hawaiian stereotypes featured in their lyrics. This “Hawaiian” music was not written or produced
by Hawaiians; rather the lyrics and melodic themes
were fabrications created by primarily white songwriters,
exploiting stereotypes of the islands to create “exotic”
themes in their music (Lewis 1987). The music of Hawaiʻi
was reclaimed by Hawaiian artists during the New Hawaiian Renaissance and beloved musicians like Israel
Kamakawiwoʻole and Gabby Pahinui recorded some of
the greatest Hawaiian language songs ever written (Lewis
1986). Music is still integral to the construction of the Hawaiian cultural identity. Sarah remembers learning Hawaiian culture “through hula, through song,” noting that hula
class was her “introduction to the Hawaiian language.”
While Hawaiian musicians were reclaiming Hawaiian
music, other Hawaiians were attempting to reclaim land
and sovereignty through protests. Perhaps most famously,
Dennis “Bumpy” Puʻuhonua Kanahele was involved in
militant activism in the late 1980s and early 1990s. In
1993, Kanahele led a group of over three hundred people
in an occupation of Makapuʻu beach in Waimānalo for
over a year (Udell 2007). Sarah remembers driving past
the Kanahele encampment:
My grandma would say, ‘oh those damn—those dumb
Hawaiians.’ Even then, she wasn’t equating staking
a claim and claiming your identity, and claiming your
nationality, that wasn’t important to her. So I remember
that. And [these protestors] were villainized in the public
media, because they were ‘dumb Hawaiians.’
That has certainly changed. Hawaiian land rights activism
gained international coverage in the summer of 2019, as
blockades of protestors halted construction vehicles on
the Mauna Kea access road and a tent village at the summit access road was erected. TMT has been in development by the world’s top astronomers for the last twenty
years. TMT (which is the name of both the telescope and
the company funding the project), was granted approval
to build in April 2013, and scheduled to break ground in
October 2014. The 1.4 billion dollar project would equip
Mauna Kea with the largest segmented mirror reflecting
telescope on the planet, nearly three times the size of the
current largest (TMT 2017). The Mauna Kea and TMT
debate has enveloped the entire Big Island as Hawaiian
activists from all over the state have peacefully but insistently opposed construction. Their protests do not resemble the protests of Sarah’s youth, and she is “impressed”
with the education TMT protestors often have. “So many
of those leaders are PhDs, masters,” she remarks. “At
[the] TMT [protests] they use the best of both worlds,”
claiming, “they used Western thinking and knowledge to
enhance their cultural beliefs.”
The current TMT protests reflect the importance of connection to the land for native Hawaiians. Respect for the
ʻāina, the land, is perhaps the most fundamental principle
of local and Hawaiian culture. This can be seen in one of
the most common Hawaiian phrases, and state motto: “Ua
Mau ke Ea o ka ʻĀina i ka Pono” or “The life of the land is
perpetuated in righteousness.” There can be no discussion of sense of place in Hawaiʻi without a discussion of
landscape, and specific places have always been a centerpiece for Hawaiian music. Perhaps one of the places
most frequently chosen for the gift of song is Mauna Kea.
In 2012, Big Island-born singer-songwriter Hāwane Rios
released “Poliʻahu I Ke Kapu,” which won the Big Island
Music Award for best Hawaiian Language Single. The
song describes different aspects of the beautiful goddess
Poliʻahu, who lives atop Mauna Kea, manifested by the
different features of the mountain.
[continued on next page]
26
Zooming In [continued from previous page]
The hui or refrain is “ʻO Poliʻahu i ke kapu / Eō mai ʻoe”
or “O sacred Poli’ahu / answer this call.” While kapu can
be translated to sacred, it also means forbidden, and is
used throughout Hawaiʻi for “no trespassing” signs. Rios
has been involved in activism on Mauna Kea since TMT
was first proposed and her lyrics often reflect her activist
position. Similarly, Ekolu, a Jawaiian (Hawaiian reggae)
band from Maui, released a single in 2019, “Desecration.”
The lyrics overtly refer to the TMT debate, with the chorus
proclaiming “This is desecration / an abomination / Rise
up, stand for Mauna Kea / Eō, Hawaiian nation!” Hawaiian
music has often been about place, but as places become
sites of protest, songs become anthems for activists.
engaged and present, something I hadn’t felt perhaps
since COVID-19 isolation began. I felt like a cartographer and explorer, mapping all of the information Sarah
revealed. Each time I finished one rough outline of the
map, there was more to add. Since I had informed Sarah
it would only take about an hour, I could only finish a fraction of the map I want to be able to examine. Despite the
unusual circumstances, conducting ethnographic work is
still thrilling. Despite the world in complete pandemonium,
this hour spent in front of my laptop on my bed was the
most engaged I had felt in weeks. After my mom returns
to her room, I pick up Kiko, one of my oldest confidants,
and I tell her a secret, “Okay, I still want to be an ethnomusicologist!”
Hawaiian land reclamation is a complex and thorny
subject. The Mauna Kea and TMT debate is a fight that
will take lots of conversation, understanding, and time to
untangle. Luckily, some Hawaiian music is much more
easily reclaimed. Sarah, who grew up dancing to hapa
haole songs, described a reclamation she felt:
Works Cited
Lewis, George H. 1984. “Da Kine Sounds: The Function
of Music As Social Protest in the New Hawaiian Renaissance.” American Music 2 (2): 38–52.
There’s a CD by Amy Hānailiʻi, where she took those
hapa haole standards like ‘Sophisticated Hula’ and
‘Waikiki’ and she did them all in Hawaiian. I like how
that was taken and it felt good, it was like it was given
back to us. It was ours.
———. 1986. “Music, Culture and the Hawaiian Renaissance.” Popular Music and Society 10 (3): 47–53.
———. 1987. “Style in Revolt Music, Social Protest, and
the Hawaiian Cultural Renaissance.” International Social
Science Review 62 (4): 168–77.
Amy Hānailiʻi released “Nostalgia,” the album Sarah
refers to, in 1999. Hawaiian language was almost extinct
throughout the twentieth century, but has begun making
a resurgence. In 2020, there are over twenty Hawaiian language immersion schools spread throughout all
the main islands. Understanding the construction of the
contemporary Hawaiian identity and the role music plays
in this construction is demanding and requires much more
research, but I was very thankful to Sarah and all this
quarantine time to ponder these issues.
Stillman, Amy K. 2011. “On Defining Hawaiian Music 3.”
Hawaiian Music for Listening Pleasure. May 25, 2020.
https://amykstillman.wordpress.com/2011/06/12/on-defining-hawaiian-music-3/
Stillman, Amy K. 2009. “Legendary Hawai’i and the Politics of Place: Tradition, Translation, and Tourism.” Journal
of American Folklore 122 (483).
After thanking my interlocutor profusely, taking last minute
notes, and ensuring that Zoom was indeed recording my
interview, I hit command-Q and slam the lid of my laptop
shut. I immediately feel a huge sense of relief. I walk into
the living room of the house I grew up in, look at my oldest
dog, Kiko, and the relief turns to joy. The joy becomes
elation! “That was so much fun!” I tell Kiko, since my
parents are in another room. My mom opens the door of
their bedroom, presumably to see who I am talking to,
and I rush up to her. “Mom! That was amazing!” I tell her
about everything I felt during the interview. The anxiety I
felt while waiting, the nerves, and finally the absolute joy.
The interview itself was so riveting. Each question I asked
revealed three new questions I wanted to ask. I was so
TMT. 2017. “Thirty Meter Telescope: About.” Thirty Meter
Telescope. May 25, 2020. https://www.tmt.org/page/about
Udell, Joseph. 2007. “Whatever Happened to Bumpy
Kanahele?” Honolulu Magazine, November 1, 2007.
http://www.honolulumagazine.com/Honolulu-Magazine/
November-2007/Updates-Whatever-Happened-to-BumpyKanahele/
Van Dyke, Michelle B. 2019. “ʻA New Hawaiian Renaissance’: How A Telescope Protest Became A Movement.”
The Guardian, August 17, 2019. https://www.theguardian.
com/us-news/2019/aug/16/hawaii-telescope-protestmauna-kea
27
Conference Calendar
“Decolonising the Musical University,” Edinburgh, 23–24
July 2020. https://www.ed.ac.uk/edinburgh-college-art/
reid-school-music/decolonising-musical-university
International Association for the Study of Popular MusicBenelux Branch, Antwerp, Belgium, 15-17 October
2020. https://www.uantwerpen.be/en/conferences/
iaspm/about-the-conference/
North American British Music Studies Association,
Normal, IL, 23–26 July 2020. https://nabmsa.org/
conferences/2020-biennial-conference/
“Transcultural Hip-Hop: Constructing and Contesting
Identity, Space, and Place in the Americas and Beyond,”
30-31 October 2020. https://www.hist.unibe.ch/forschung/forschungsprojekte/hip_hop_as_a_transcultural_
phenomenon/conference/index_ger.html
24th International Conference on Wind Music, Valencia,
Spain, 23–27 July 2020. https://www.igeb.net/igeb-2020.
html
“American Contact: Intercultural Encounter and the History of the Book,” Princeton and Philadelphia, 12-14
November 2020. https://americancontact.princeton.edu/
“Heroes, Canons, Cults. Critical Inquiries” (isaScience Conference 2020), Reichenau an der Rax,
Austria, 12-16 August 2020. https://www.mdw.ac.at/
forschungsf%c3%b6rderung/isascience/call-for-papers/
“‘Women Are not Born to Compose’: Female Musical
Works from 1750 to 1950,” Lucca, Italy, 27–29 November 2020. https://www.luigiboccherini.org/2018/12/09/
women-are-not-born-to-compose-female-musical-worksfrom-1750-to-1950/
“Analog Afterlives,” Melbourne, Australia, 21-22 August
2020. http://www.wikicfp.com/cfp/servlet/event.showcfp?
eventid=99582©ownerid=161659
19th Symposium on Indigenous Music and Dance, Melbourne, Australia, 3-5 December 2020. http://www.msa.
org.au/Main.asp?_=NRPIPA
“Performing, Engaging, Knowing,” Lucerne, Switzerland,
26–29 August 2020. https://www.hslu.ch/de-ch/musik/
agenda/veranstaltungen/2020/08/26/symposium-performing-engaging-knowing/?sourceurl=/symposium-pek
“Documenting, Celebrating and Understanding the Traditional and Contemporary Performing Arts of Lampung,
Indonesia,” Melbourne, Australia, 15-17 December
2020. https://www.monash.edu/arts/music/news-andevents/events/events/icce-lampung-2020
ICTM Study Group on Musics of East Asia, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia, China, 27–29 August 2020. https://www.
ictmusic.org/group/study-group-musics-east-asia/post/
call-papers-7th-symposium-study-group-musics-eastasia-27-29
Music, Sound, and Trauma: Interdisciplinary Perspectives, online, 12–14 February 2021. https://musicsoundtraumaconf2021.com/
“Music and Cultural Diplomacy in the Middle East:
Geopolitical Re-Configurations for the 21st Century,”
Copenhagen, Denmark, 10-11 September 2020. https://
artsandculturalstudies.ku.dk/Calendar/2020/music-andcultural-diplomacy/
“Climates of Popular Music,” 21st Biennial Conference
of the International Association for the Study of Popular
Music, Daegu, South Korea, 6–10 July 6-10 2021. http://
www.iaspm2021.org/
ICTM Study Group on Sound, Movement, and the Sciences, Stockholm, Sweden, 25–27 September 2020.
http://www.ictmusic.org/group/ictm-study-group-soundmovement-and-sciences/post/first-1st-symposium-ictmstudy-group-sound
8th Conference of the Royal Musical Association Music &
Philosophy Study Group, London, 1–2 July 2021. https://
musicandphilosophy.ac.uk/events/mpsg-2021/
28
29
SEM Publications
Ethnomusicology
Editor: Frank Gunderson
Ethnomusicology is the premier publication in the field. Its scholarly articles represent current theoretical perspectives
and research in ethnomusicology and related fields, while playing a central role in expanding the discipline in the United
States and abroad. As the official journal of the Society for Ethnomusicology, Ethnomusicology is aimed at a diverse
audience of musicologists, anthropologists, folklorists, cultural studies scholars, musicians, and others. This inclusive
journal also features book, recording, film, video, and multimedia reviews. Peer-reviewed by the Society’s international
membership, Ethnomusicology has been published three times a year since the 1950s.
• All Ethnomusicology articles can be found electronically at https://www.jstor.org/journal/ethnomusicology.
• If your institution currently has JSTOR access to Ethnomusicology, please use stable JSTOR links (or your library’s
proxy links) in your course syllabi for articles, rather than distributing them by other means.
• If your institution does not have a current subscription to Ethnomusicology, recommend one to a librarian. Information
on institutional subscriptions can be found at https://www.press.uillinois.edu/journals/ethno.html.§
Ethnomusicology Today: The SEM Podcast
Editor: Trevor S. Harvey
Ethnomusicology Today is a podcast series that features stories and interviews aimed at engaging a broad audience of
educators, scholars, musicians, and a listening public interested in contemporary issues in global music studies.
• SEM 2019 Pre-Conference Interview: Latin American Brass Bands with Javier León and Ed Wolf
• Episode 10: Musical Participation and Global Health in the Gambia with Bonnie McConnell
Ethnomusicology Translations
General Editor: Richard K. Wolf
Ethnomusicology Translations is a peer-reviewed, open-access online series for the publication of ethnomusicological
literature translated into English. Articles and other literature in any language other than English will be considered for
editorial review, translation, and publication. Preference will be given to individual articles published in scholarly journals
or books during the past twenty years. As a central online resource, Ethnomusicology Translations aims to increase access to the global scope of recent music scholarship and advance ethnomusicology as an international field of research
and communication. Guidelines for submissions.
• Issue 9: Takanori Fujita: The Community of Classical Japanese Music Transmission, translated by Edgar W. Pope.
• Issue 10: Serena Facci: The Akazehe of Burundi: Polyphonic Interlocking Greetings and the Female Ceremonial,
translated by Alessandra Ciucci.
Sound Matters: An Online Forum
Editor: Eliot Bates
Sound Matters is a blog about making ethnomusicological research and debates accessible to and engaged with the
wider public. Sponsored by the Society for Ethnomusicology, the blog is a peer-reviewed digital publication that emphasizes collaboration and new ways of doing ethnomusicology. Sound Matters provides a platform for young, independent
and tenured scholars, inclusive of those working inside and outside academic institutions, to challenge the status quo in
the field of ethnomusicology and colonial forms of knowledge production.
• SEM Blog: New mission statement
• Gavin Lee, Waiting for Aspiring Progressives
SEM Student News
Editor: Eugenia Siegel Conte
SEM Student News is a biannual publication of the Society for Ethnomusicology, created and run by students. In cooperation with the SEM Student Union, we aim to voice current student issues and ideas, and to provide useful, relevant
information for students conducting research on musicking. Most of all, we provide a forum for students to communicate
with their peers and to address the challenges and opportunities that we face together.
• Volume 16.1: Music and Theory
• Volume 15.2: Music and Affect
30
The Society for Ethnomusicology
2020 Virtual Annual Meeting
22–31 October 2020
Pre-Conference Symposium on 21 October
Ethnomusicology Internet Resources
The SEM Website
SEM-L Electronic List
SEM Student Union Blog
SEM Facebook Group & SEM Facebook Page
SEM on Twitter
Ethnomusicology Websites
American Folklife Center
Association for Chinese Music Research
British Forum for Ethnomusicology
British Library, World and Traditional Music
Canadian Society for Traditional Music / Société canadien
pour les traditions musicales
Comparative Musicology
Ethnomusicology OnLine (EOL), (home site)
Ethnomusicology Review
Ethnomuicology Translations
International Council for Traditional Music
Iranian Musicology Group
Smithsonian Institution: Folkways, Festivals, & Folklife
Society for American Music
Society for Asian Music
UCLA Ethnomusicology Archive
University of Washington, Ethnomusicology Archives
Fondazione Casa di Oriani, Ravenna
31
SEM Chapter Websites
Mid-Atlantic Chapter
Midwest Chapter
Niagara Chapter
Northeast Chapter
Northern California Chapter
Northwest Chapter
Southeast-Caribbean Chapter
Southern California & Hawai`i Chapter
Southern Plains Chapter
Southwest Chapter
SEM Section Websites
Applied Ethnomusicology Section
Education Section
Gender and Sexualities Taskforce
Popular Music Section
South Asia Performing Arts Section §