Enlightenment 2.01
Lyubomir Stefanov, PhD, lstefanov@nbu.bg
Key words: education; university; civil society; citizens.
Abstract
It has always been about understanding. Be it the news, the weather forecast or the
speech one encounters, understanding was and is the key to a success in life. Over the past
nearly 3,000 years since the written tradition was established in the Middle East knowledge
began to play a crucial role in the life of individuals and their socio-political establishments
and relations. The ability to not just read, thus reproducing mechanically what you read but
actually understand what you read in detail and in depth became a truly desired art. That was
the very subject of education – mastering the art of understanding and not just
comprehending, i.e. literacy. The method of critical thinking established by the
Enlightenment along with the mass literacy of individuals, however diminished in value over
the past two decades as information channels and moreover their speed and nature changed
dramatically the everyday life of all human beings. In the age of Internet, the very core of
humanity is threatened by phenomena like “post-truth”, fake and false news. The solution is
simple as usual – we must speed up in every possible way the process of Enlightenment 2.0
to counter fight the lack of functional illiteracy among humans which deprives them of their
imagination and freedom of thinking.
1
The paper is presented at the XX th PR Summer school of the Department of Mass
communication at New Bulgarian University, Sofia, June, 2018
Once upon a time it was all about knowledge. It was the key to prosperity and social
success. The wise men, the high priests, the clergy – all of those were keepers of the ultimate
knowledge – the words of God. Everything that contradicted them was at best hidden if not
burned in an act of spiritual zeal - the “auto-de-fé”. Later knowledge became even more
appreciated and valuable as news started to flaw around the land, even though at turtle’s
speed in contemporary terms, trough adventurous merchants, pilgrims and of course, wars.
Information became precious like gold as it portrayed the world to those who possessed it in
full scale presenting opportunities and avoiding potential threats.
However, the skill of being able to make difference between what you think you know
and the reality was the key attribute of the being a successful or failure. That ability was
understanding the meaning of the information floating around, ergo appreciating its value and
using it for individual or societal gains. In order to make the difference humans started piling
up information and processing it dully for to be able to write the usage of it down and pass it
over to others either pro bono or for some benefits. Education evolved as a tool and a system
for preserving that gained both theoretical and empirical knowledge. Systemizing it for the
generations to come became equal to the invention of a new tool or technique, because if
there were no methods for understanding the value of the novelties they would have vanished
over time, lost somewhere on the shelves of History.
Education needed people to evolve and start understanding the benefit not just of
memorized by heart ballads or poems but of mathematic formulae, sophisticated philosophy
and actual history. Still, the element of understanding the symbols on the stone, the
parchment or the paper page persisted. And it would be there for around two and a half
Millenia until Guttenberg will present to the world his invention – a machine that will
revolutionize the way people access and compile knowledge.
But in the meantime, during the process of initial gathering and processing of
knowledge the holy men of God’s words were not inclined, not as if they are so much
nowadays, to share their priceless knowledge with the commoners. It was the nobility which
was allowed a glimpse behind the veil of ignorance, of course, at a certain high price – not to
challenge or interfere with the deeds of the spiritual leaders, who in turn, gracefully provided
the blessings of God(s) as an act of sublime celestial support and recognition of the authority
of those in power, as well. Thus, acquiring knowledge, especially outside the rigid lines of
2
the religious dogma became a taboo and heresy. However, traces of the ancient knowledge
from Crete, Egypt, Persia, Babylon and the city-states of Hellas made its way to Europe
through an unexpected source – the Moorish scientists who arrived with the conquest of
Iberia in IX century. Ever since it was just a matter of time one could say that knowledge will
find a way to the general public.
And so it did when Guttenberg presented Europe and the world his printing press.
Still, it took no less than four centuries for the French encyclopaedists to compile their
masterwork and declare aloud that all people are equal in their rights and no one must keep
the world of knowledge just for own usage. Literacy, one might say became the fourth
unheralded integral part of the slogan of the French Revolution of 1789 – “Liberté, égalité,
fraternité!” however the encyclopaedists wrongly assumed, or we just lost the direction and
the core of their legacy one might argue, that knowledge brings understanding.
The world as we know it today seems eons away from that simple logical
consequence. In the age of Internet, information substituted knowledge, numbers overcome
common sense and emotions took the driving seat from the reasonable mind. Paradoxically,
in the era of the “24/7 open-access” humanity seems more perplexed and confused than
during the times of the Great Discoveries or even those of the demise of the Babylon tower.
The post-truth phenomenon actually stands precisely for that lack of functional understanding
between the linkage of the 4 W’s – what, when, who, where, i.e. for what reason.
Light up the world!
Ever since the Age of Enlightenment literacy was considered to be one of the most
valuable skills allowing humans to have access to knowledge beyond the physical limitations
of one’s life. Knowledge was considered the utmost treasure of them all – regardless of time,
space and place one could cope with whatever comes his or her way if possessing the
appropriate knowledge. For a long time, actually almost two centuries and a half, that was the
goal of the modern educational system: to produce well-prepared individuals for the adult life
either by training them in a field of practical skills or giving them access to applied sciences.
The principle was: the more you know the more chances you have to succeed.
However, gradually, over time and especially under the pressure of the
industrialisation and the post-Second World War developments, the education based on
mastering life-skills was substituted by practical training aimed at guaranteeing graduates
more chances of making money in pursuit of individual prosperity. That became the slogan
3
actually of almost all of the Ivy-league universities across the Atlantic, eventually winning
subsequently the Oxbridge areal too.
Soon that became the rule of the thumb for all levels of the educational system –
pupils were demanded to memorize zounds of pages and exercises just to have a chance to
stand the standardized exams at the end of each year. Sadly, the principle of the
Enlightenment - no hidden or secret knowledge because of illiteracy, was converted to all
knowledge is hidden unless you pay for it to be unveiled to you if you can afford it, of course.
All of this came as a consequence of something even worse: the education of classical type
along the lines drawn by Aristotle and likes, based on understanding, spurring and fostering
aspirations for perpetual improvement and expansion of human reach became victim of
money-based approach and narrow-minded professionalisation and specialization.
Ironically, the Enlightenment fell victim of its own credo, at least in the industrialised
world, for by spreading knowledge it was narrowed in scope and goal by either greedy or
simply non-visionary individuals. Thus, the education became a burden and not a gift or
aspiration for the secrets of this world and beyond it for the students at all levels. Recently,
actually during the past decade, teachers and professors started to worry that their pupils
show no signs of critical thinking and lack functional understanding which makes them
perfect victims of the new Internet-based applications and smart technologies for brainwashing, manipulation and mind control. Talking short via Tweeter or not at all via
Instagram ruined the very goal of the Enlightenment – individuals should be able to express
freely and in detail themselves. It seems that shortening the message nowadays has shortened
not just the meaning but the thinking abilities of the humans as well.
However, we must take notice that those generalizing attempts comply just to Europe,
some parts of North America, some parts of South America and some small chunks of Asia
and Africa as in the remaining parts of the world the population is still living in preEnlightenment terms – illiteracy there is a norm not an exempt. Almost 102 million young
man of age of 15 to 24 are illiterate today2. Although literacy has been high on the
development agenda over the past decades, UIS data show that 750 million adults – twothirds of whom are women – still lack basic reading and writing skills, according to the latest
available data for 2016. The global adult literacy rate was 86% in 2016, while the youth
literacy rate was 91%. According to UIS data, the majority of countries missed the Education
for All (EFA) goal of reducing adult illiteracy rates by 50% between 2000 and 2015. At the
2
https://data.unicef.org/topic/education/literacy/ accessed on September 25th, 2018
4
global level, the adult and youth literacy rates are estimated to have grown by only 4% each
over this period3.
What is really troubling these days is that in most countries there are large
generational literacy gaps favouring the young. These differences across generations point to
a global trend: the high literacy rate among the youth indicates that as time passes, the
literacy rate for the overall population will continue to increase4, however as things stand
right now the elder people lose more and more time to keep up the pace with their children
and grandchildren. Most of the time this is mission impossible as smart technologies do not
just change rapidly, they are outdated literally overnight. And one more thing as the late
Steve Jobs used to say, English is the language of Internet and smart techs but not all people,
especially over 65+ years do speak it nor understand it.
The effort of understanding or the effort of knowing
Situation did not improve when the Internet took over our lives, regardless the initial
expectations. The boom of personal computers’ usage did not occur because of their fast
speed processing, i.e. offering the best out of multiple-choice options or solutions. Instead it
happened because individuals got linked to each other through various data bases-sources of
various information of almost every imaginable field of human knowledge. Computer-based
games also contributed to the light-speed spread of the new home appliance. However, it
would have never happened at all had it not been an invention dating back to 1960’s – the
ARPANET polished by Joseph C. R. Licklider, the harbinger of the Internet and its logical
successor the world wide web developed by sir Tim Berners-Lee in the early 1990’s.
Actually, it was not prior the discovery of the later how to compose a software for the first
Web server and the first Web client, or “browser” that will in fact allow for files to be
exchanged over the Internet and make full use of it. On the back of those two revolutionary
technologies the world was transformed overnight into a giant buzzing hub. Humanity was no
more to be at doubt what happened on the other side of the planet – a click or two were
enough to know, especially after the second Millenia arrived gloriously.
3
http://uis.unesco.org/sites/default/files/documents/fs45-literacy-rates-continue-rise-generation-to-next-en-
2017_0.pdf accessed on September 25th, 2018
4
https://ourworldindata.org/literacy#in-most-countries-there-are-large-generational-literacy-gaps-favouring-the-
young accessed on September 25th, 2018
5
The so-called social media are not media nor social per se, instead they are destructing
the integrity and the very fabric of the society by self-proclaiming own authority in place of
social contract and rules, and bragging about personal perception not news. What is news in
Facebook is actually a personal diary, a lexicon, a confession, an irrational or deliberate
appeal – exactly what it was meant to be by Mr. Zuckerberg. But users willing to become part
of someone’s story or history by sharing it and declaring commitment to cases, issues, causes
or problems made it look-like a news-stream for its 24/7 flow and not for its content.
Having an opinion on everything from sports and personal life to neuroscience,
politics and gene mapping created by the illusion of freedom of expression and speech of the
“social media” stepped in to decrease progressively the meaning of free will. The victim was
the actual competence of those millions of speakers willing to partake into the decisionmaking and taking process of running the world on multiple levels and layers. Education
became obstacle as making an expert statement became seen as preposterous selfmanifestation of intellectual superiority. In result the existing establishments, experts and
specialists and their contributions were undermined and no more valid to the extend they
used to be. Internets’ Mr. and Mrs. Know-it-all became the standard.
That is why individuals need more than ever solid-rock education which to teach them
build their own opinion based on available past knowledge, data and information. “Keep it
simple stupid!” as the saying goes. That was a saying which carried negligence for science
and reason. Now it means think before assume! However, before doing that, paradoxically
individual should be thought once more how to that. Apparently, something which happened
over the course of the past two and a half centuries was washed away by the Internet literally
overnight.
The live never-ending news flaw launched by CNN in the early 90’s of 20th century
became standard in the Internet age. The natural curiosity of humans was transformed
gradually in less than two decades in hunger for news. Such is the need for news, regardless
that most of them are fake, false or not at all news, that it made humans panic if something
did not beep or flash regularly onto the screens of their smart devices. Naturally the quality
gate keepers, the so-called traditional media outlets, succumbed to the pressure and started,
though in a more sophisticated way to contribute on their own to the 24/7 news fall stream.
But even that would not have been a problem if some critical social systems did not fail to
work their safeguarding functions out. Of those responsible for preventing the current
traumatic situation for the humanity the educational system carries the biggest fault.
6
Why is that? Well, because it is the system that conveys the most coveted treasure of
them all – the knowledge of the human civilization and above all its understanding. Having in
mind Bulgarian education system both primary, but mainly secondary as well one can find
out that the system per se is not wrong by default nor its functioning principles mistaken. The
problem arises from the manner of teaching and structuring the curricula. On the overall the
Bulgarian education system attempts to teach pupils how to deal with 21st century challenges
via 20th century methods. Thus, the paradox faced by the universities that have to start all
over the education of the sophomores who lack basic life skills and above all curiosity and
learning habits.
Regardless that communication is going through a revolution, the education system,
unfortunately at university level too, fails to address the reality. Lagging in both pace and
tempo educators at all levels simply detach young man from the knowledge at all, leaving
plenty of space for one-off issues approached without systematic interest and quidded efforts.
As a result, there is already a generation which firmly believes that if something is not
discoverable in Google, YouTube or Facebook it does not exists or is not relevant, i.e. cool at
all.
Of course, there is another aspect of transforming the communication, which is not
that negative but on the contrary. The fund-rising, non-profit and charity activities mainly
benefitted from that side-effect (Christova, 2018). Gathering mass support in no-time for
noble causes became much easier via the channels provided by Internet. Spreading the good
news or exposing wrongdoings was never faster than nowadays.
However, signing a petition via e-mail link or “liking” a post or event via Facebook or
bragging about it via Twitter does not stand for actually doing it for real. But for the addicted
users of the services of those providers which are wrongly labelled “social media” instead of
platforms for sharing individual experiences of any kind the act of twitting, posting it or
shooting a photo is the real thing. This cognitive dissonance perfectly epitomizes the very
point of this article that understanding the consequence of something does not come naturally
instead it requires efforts of deliberate education dedicated to mastering the art of critical
thinking and accessing specific or general knowledge on your own and not just through the
eyes of the others.
7
The consequences – Artificial Intelligence vs. Human Intelligence
In this time of racing against the clock people naturally started to feel more and more
perplexed and dazzled by the technological miracles of the surrounding world. As if it has
changed overnight without a warning and yet it is still the old familiar place of wars for
territory, starvation, drought, climate change due to artificial pollution. The virtual reality
sold to consumers could not have arrived at more proper time offering escape form this
wretched reality of ours. The transformation of the environment we witness both physical and
as a consequence physiological and emotional does not make things easier for humans. Quite
the opposite – it seems to cause more trouble than comfort for the humans in 21st century.
Unfortunately, the transformative power of the Fourth Industrial Revolution – the
Digital revolution is even more sweeping than the one of the previous three combined. It has
been ongoing roughly since the middle of the last century and is epitomized by a fusion of
technologies which wipes the lines between the physical, digital, and biological spheres. The
First one harnessed the power of water and steam power to mechanize production. The
Second used electric power to create mass production, while the Third applied electronics
and information technology to automate production.
The Fourth Industrial Revolution will most definitely change not only what we do but
also who we are as humans. It will affect our identity and all the issues associated with it: our
sense of privacy, our notions of ownership, our consumption patterns, the time we devote to
work and leisure, and how we develop our careers, cultivate our skills, meet people, and
nurture relationships. As Klaus Schwab quite correctly remarked in his review of the Fourth
Revolution “the inexorable integration of technology in our lives could diminish some of our
quintessential human capacities, such as compassion and cooperation. Our relationship with
our smartphones is a case in point. Constant connection may deprive us of one of life’s most
important assets: the time to pause, reflect, and engage in meaningful conversation”5.
It could not be more compelling than this – losing our humanity because of
technology development we started to improve the quality of our lives and the surrounding
environment. Happily, the process of Enlightenment 2.0 is already on its way educating
pupils how to become 100 % citizens. The new curriculum is evolving exactly around those
key issues which make us humans – compassion, solidarity, tradition, tolerance, respect for
5
https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/2015-12-12/fourth-industrial-revolution accessed on September 19th,
2018
8
diversity, justice, critical thinking and curiosity. On the overall a Terminator scenario for this
planet looks really absurd as it stands, though we must not forget the warnings of the late
Stephen Hawking that the AI could become a real and present danger for humanity if “our AI
systems must do what we want them to do”6. His words read further that their utmost goal
should not be development with focus on techniques that are neutral with respect to purpose,
but rather on ones that are making AI not just more capable in scope, but also maximizing the
societal benefit of their progress.
It is more than enough that AI is doing things for us faster, precise and cost-effective
and efficient. We do not have to take example from our machines, which are no more than
helping hands and tools and transform into automated robots. Replication is not quintessential
for the human nature – innovation, diversity and progress are. So, let’s not transform the
language of Homer, Voltaire, Shakespeare, Goethe, Cervantes, Boccaccio, Marquez, Lorca,
Tolstoy or Sun Tzu into digits that mean only to computers and not to civilized human
beings.
6
https://futureoflife.org/ai-open-letter/?cn-reloaded=1 accessed on September 19th, 2018
9
References:
Sarailiev, Ivan (2004) The Effort of Knowing, NBU, Sofia [Саръилиев, Иван (2004)
Усилието да узнаваш, НБУ, София.]
Christova, Evelina, (2018) Communication of Charity, ROI Communication, Sofia
[Христова, Евелина (2018) Комуникация на благотворителността, Рой Комюникейшън,
София].
Roth, Michael S. (2014) Beyond the University-Why Liberal Education Matters, Yale
University Press.
Schwab, Klaus (2017) The Fourth Industrial Revolution, Crown Business, New York.
UNESCO Institute for Statistics (UIS) (2017) Fact Sheet No. 45
Zakaria, Fareed (2015) In Defence of a Liberal Education, W.W. Norton & Company, New
York.
Internet sources:
https://data.unicef.org
http://uis.unesco.org
https://ourworldindata.org
https://www.foreignaffairs.com
https://futureoflife.org
10