Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
What is the essence of our humanity and how could this have arisen by evolution? A plausible mechanism by which our essentially human qualities were developed by evolution is presented here for discussion. We now live in a global environment and our demands so damage the supporting biosphere as to threaten our extinction. To survive the present crisis we must develop a culture of kindness and consideration . If our bodies work as I speculate, we humans are well served by believing in God and our purpose in the universe.
Philosophy Compass, 2014
Encyclopedia of Life Sciences, 2002
A discussion of the fundamental components of what we commonly refer to as human condition is presented. It is explicated that mankind, as a sentient being, possess three levels of existence that include a body, a soul, and a driving spirit. It is further elucidated that as physical beings thriving within the 3 rd dimensional layer of consciousness, we possess a myriad of physical bodies holographically existing within diverse parallel dimensions of Omni earth, each vibrating at similar frequencies but being out of phase with one another. What constitutes the soul, in essence, describes our genetics, which has a matter-antimatter or substance-wave duality at the quantum scale. And, while the physical body is spearheaded by a physical consciousness operating at the beta wave level, we commonly interface with our soul at a sub-consciousness level requiring much higher frequencies within the range of alpha to theta waves. Meanwhile, our spirit thriving as pure antimatter wave energy is hardly accessible within the dark and low consciousness state of 3 rd dimensional physicality, as it would operate at frequency levels beyond the delta waves, constantly traversing higher dimensional layers of physicality (up to 12 th) and beyond. This is what is commonly referred to as the level of superconsciousness. Our primary mission in life is to raise frequency, and once we reach the level of crystallinity incipient with our mind resonating in coherent theta waves, we begin to be privy to openly thrive within the 5 th to the 12 th dimensions of consciousness. It is also clarified that at the level III crystallinity we resonate with the 9 th dimension, beyond which there is no necessity for corporeal existence. Meanwhile, within the level III of
The notion of ‘human nature’ has long since captured the interest and imagina- tion of philosophers, theologians, and scientists; as such, it appears that the study of human nature is one amenable to inter-disciplinary cross-fertilization. However, it is not obvious that there is a single coherent project being undertaken, neither between nor within disciplines. Rather, we argue that there are three main quests for human nature – the quest for universal human nature, the quest for human unique- ness, and the quest for innate human nature – and that different philosophical, theo- logical, and scientific enterprises emphasize (or, indeed, neglect) different quests. Furthermore, these different intellectual enterprises may differ more fundamen- tally, namely in their very object of enquiry, the definition of the theoretical term ‘human being.’ For scientists, the term ‘human being’ is often treated as being coter- minous with the term Homo sapiens; that is, ‘human being’ is a biological category, a species. This definition is now, rightly or wrongly, taken for granted by philosophers and theologians, but it is not necessarily the most appropriate. It remains an open question whether, for any given philosophical and/or theological project, the bio- logical concept Homo sapiens is the most appropriate way to understand the term ‘human being.’ This paper considers these issues by scrutinizing two cases – from evolutionary psychology and theological anthropology – in each case examining the adequacy of the biological concept Homo sapiens for its purpose, as well as the viability of each of the three quests for human nature.
Valkhof Pers. Annalen van het Thijmgenootschap, jrg 106 (2018), 4, 2018
Using insights from different disciplines this essay reflects on human nature and the way it evolved the past two million years. This evolution will be understood as a process of sedimentation, implying that changes from our past are still working today. Consequently our reflection has to start with the most basic layer of human nature: the dynamics related to our life as group animals and the way the earliest humans have lived. Subsequently we discuss the phase of nomadic hunters and gatherers, a way of life which covered the largest part of our history and which both spiritually and temporally shows its own characteristics. Then comes the phase in which agriculture was all-important and finally the most recent phase which is dominated by various civilizations. We explore the idea that these histories still motivate us today, mainly by means of ‘eternal’ values we support. So what DNA does for our natural evolution, may be done by normative principles for cultural evolution. It does not mean that this heritage is recognized by everyone. On the contrary: there are many tensions even within one community, and especially in a world where different cultural traditions are defying one another. This essay will be concluded by a brief reflection on possible meaning of the Holy Spirit.
Mètode Revista de difusió de la investigació, 2017
International Journal of Humanities, Social Sciences and Education
We live at a time of multiple revolutions in science, particularly in medical science and technology. Profound innovations are emerging that will not just change the problems we address or the ways we respond to problems, but which may transform the sorts of creatures that we are. Our species may be changed for better or worse by what is in prospect. The nature of the human species is therefore at stake. " The Past, Present and Future of Human Nature " might seem all encompassing, but it leaves almost everything out. For most of the time that living creatures have existed there have been no humans and thus no human nature. We are a recent and probably transient phenomenon; we are well advised to keep that humbling fact in mind. Still, as a member of this recent but disarmingly clever species, I have an interest in understanding what our nature is, what it might become, and how that might depend on the choices we make. It is distinctively human to engage in self-conscious reflection on our own nature. Doing so has gone on for all of recorded human history and must have been going on longer than that. Wonder is among the most salient distinguishing characteristics of humans: we are the self-reflective creature. Our intellectual history centers prominently on efforts to understand our own behavior and motivations, our relationship to nature, and our place in the universe or, on some views, beyond. We have devoted much thought to exploring whether we are by nature altruistic or selfish, warlike or peace-loving, monogamous or polygamous, shaped more by genetics or by experience and environment, driven by deterministic causes or free to make autonomous choices. We have sought answers to understand the human condition, and to know whether we are the result of purposive design or the chance product of natural processes. We have long wondered about the relationship among our minds, our brains, and the baffling phenomena of consciousness, personal identity, and self-awareness. These issues were historically addressed primarily by philosophers and theologians; now, they are also vigorously pursued by others such as sociobiologists, cognitive neuroscientists, computational linguists, and physicists. We have sought to discern what about ourselves is inherent in our nature and what is socially constructed. We find ourselves unendingly fascinating. On the traditional Judeo-Christian view, humans were the apex of God's intentional creation; distinct from the rest of the world, they exerted dominion over nature. Other views, such as those of some Native American cultures, saw humans as being at one with nature, properly seeking harmony with the larger whole. Science, even in its earliest iterations, is the human effort to understand what nature
Innovación Pública, 2023
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/349054798_Optimum_Combinations_of_GGM_and_GDEM_Models_for_Precise_National_Geoid_Modelling
Rivista di Storia dell’Educazione, 2020
TRADE – Transformations of Adriatic Europe (2nd–9th Centuries AD) Proceedings of the conference in Zadar, 11th–13th February 2016, 2023
PSAK 102-Akad Murabahah, 2020
HISTORIA SOCIAL DE LA EDUCACIÓN CHILENA TOMO 7 Estado docente con crecientes nive- les de responsabilidad de sus aulas. Chile, 1920-1973. Mujeres, educación rural y regiones, 2023
Jalingo Journal of Social and Management Sciences, 2024
International Journal of Osteoarchaeology, 2024
2019
Journal of School of Public Health and Institute of Public Health Research, 2019
Econometrica, 1998
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 2007
Language Art, 2022
Studies of the Industrial Geography Commission of the Polish Geographical Society, 2022
Annali d'Italianistica, 2024