View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk
brought to you by
CORE
provided by ScholarSpace at University of Hawai'i at Manoa
Hawaiʻi-Pacific Evaluation Association 2015 Annual conference (9/11/15)
Impact Evaluation of Grass-Root Leadership Development (Roundtable)
Yao Hill, UH Manoa
yao.hill@hawaii.edu
Impact Evaluation of Grassroots Leadership Development
Assessment Leadership Building Project (ALBP) at UH Mānoa
Context:
-
230+ academic programs need to assess whether their graduating students have achieved
program student learning outcomes (SLOs).
In 2012, 73% of the programs reported assessment took place and 48% used the results.
UH Mānoa Assessment Office’s charge: 100% of programs to conduct systematic, meaningful,
and management program assessment of SLOs.
UH Mānoa Assessment Office capacity: 2 full time faculty + 1 GA
ALBP Goals and Outcomes
Goal
Cultivate a cadre of
faculty to lead
collaborative and
meaningful program
assessment and
build a culture of
assessment for
improvement on
campus.
Learning outcomes
1. Assessment
knowledge
2. Assessment
skills
3. Assessment
scholarship
disposition
4. Facilitative
leadership Skills
Output
Assessment
Plans
Impact
Leadership
Activities
Scholarship
Activities
Change in
Program
1. Engaged colleague
partners
2. Lead collaborative
projects
3. Mentored colleagues
1. Presentations
2. Publications
Meaningful program
assessment activities
ALBP Model:
Intensive
multi-day AL
Institute (ALI)
Semester-Long
follow-up
support
Features of ALI
Active learning and simulation of facilitating real
program assessment activities
Guest speakers/presenters with real life examples
Individualized consultation + peer feedback
Networking opportunities with colleagues
Status:
3 Cohorts since 2013, 34 participants from 30
programs and 13 colleges
Poster
presentation
of project
Hawaiʻi-Pacific Evaluation Association 2015 Annual conference (9/11/15)
Impact Evaluation of Grass-Root Leadership Development (Roundtable)
Yao Hill, UH Manoa
yao.hill@hawaii.edu
ALBP Evaluation
Evaluation Target
1. Assessment
Knowledge
2. Assessment Skills
3. Scholarship
Disposition
4. Facilitation Skills
Assessment Plans
Leadership Activities
Scholarship Activities
Changes in Program
Assessment Status
Methods
Results
ALI Learning Outcomes
Institute Evaluation
94% reported being able to
Questionnaire
distinguish good assessment
practices from poor ones. [n = 34]
Institute Evaluation
97% reported being able to utilize at
Questionnaire
least 3 assessment strategies/tools [n
= 33]
Assessment plan
100% planned to employ at least 4
content analysis
assessment strategies/tools [n = 34]
Institute Evaluation
(1) 97% of the participants reported
Questionnaire
being able to locate resources on
learning assessment? [n = 34]
(2) 53% plan to conduct research or
other forms of scholarly activity on
learning assessment. [n = 34]
Institute Evaluation
94% reported being able to utilize at
Questionnaire
least 3 facilitation techniques. [n =
34]
Assessment plan
94% planned collaborative activities
content analysis
to engage faculty [n = 34]
65% explicitly planned to utilize
facilitation techniques [n = 34]
Output
Expert judgement
100% meaningful and implementable
assessment plans [n = 34]
Impact
Self-report and
91% engaged collaborative activities
observation
in their programs [n = 22]
Documentation
- 95% presented posters at UHM
Assessment Poster Exhibit [n = 22]
- 1 peer-reviewed article published
Benchmark
Self-report and
observation
50
26 programs advanced their
assessment activities
90%
90%
100% 3
strategies
90%
40%
90%
90%
75%
100%
80%
90%
10 articles
Further Impact Evaluation Possibilities
-
Develop mentorship: mentor at least one colleague to be the core faculty in program
assessment.
Develop network: rely on and help fellow ALBP participants in program assessment activities
and scholarship endeavors
Move the assessment needle and lead the completion of an assessment cycle
Exercise greater influence: Impact assessment activities beyond one’s program/department
Hawaiʻi-Pacific Evaluation Association 2015 Annual conference (9/11/15)
Impact Evaluation of Grass-Root Leadership Development (Roundtable)
Yao Hill, UH Manoa
yao.hill@hawaii.edu
Useful articles:
Black, A. M. & Earnest, G. W. (2009). Measuring the outcomes of leadership development programs.
Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 16(2), 184-196.
Hannum, K. M., Martineau, J. W., & Reinelt, C. (Ed.) (2007) The Handbook of Leadership Development
Evaluation. Jossey-Bass.