PM 7
PM 7
PM 7
Project Management
A Managerial Approach
Chapter 7
Top-Down Budgeting
This strategy is based on collecting the judgment and experiences of top and middle managers These cost estimates are then given to lower level managers, who are expected to continue the breakdown into budget estimates This process continues to the lowest level
Chapter 7-3
Top-Down Budgeting
Advantages:
Aggregate budgets can often be developed quite accurately
Budgets are stable as a percent of total allocation
Bottom-Up Budgeting
In this method, elemental tasks, their schedules, and their individual budgets are constructed following the WBS or project action plan The people doing the work are consulted regarding times and budgets for the tasks to ensure the best level of accuracy Initially, estimates are made in terms of resources, such as labor hours and materials Bottom-up budgets should be and usually are, more accurate in the detailed tasks, but it is critical that all elements be included
Chapter 7-5
Bottom-Up Budgeting
Advantages:
Individuals closer to the work are apt to have a more accurate idea of resource requirements The direct involvement of low-level managers in budget preparation increases the likelihood that they will accept the result with a minimum of aversion Involvement is a good managerial training technique, giving junior managers valuable experience
Chapter 7-6
Budgeting
Top-down budgeting is very common True bottom-up budgets are rare
Senior managers see the bottom-up process as risky They tend not to be particularly trusting of ambitious subordinates who they fear may overstate resource requirements They are reluctant to hand over control to subordinates whose experience and motives are questionable
Chapter 7-7
Wishful thinking leads the superior to underestimate cost (and time) because the superior has a stake in representing the project as a profitable venture
The subordinates are led to build-in some level of protection against failure by adding an allowance for Murphys Law
Chapter 7-9
Program Budgeting
Program budgeting aggregates income and expenditures across programs (projects) Aggregation by program is in addition to, not instead of, aggregation by organizational unit These budgets usually take the form of a spreadsheet with standard categories disaggregated into regular operations and charges to the various projects
Chapter 7-13
Program Budgeting
Project Budget by Task and Month
Monthly Budget () Task
A B C D E F G H I J
I
1 2 2 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
J
2 3 4 5 7 7 6 7 8 9
Estimate
7000 9000 10000 6000 12000 3000 9000 5000 8000 6000 75000
1
5600
2
1400 3857 3750 3600
5143 5000 2400 4800 3000 2571 5143 1286 3750 1250 2667 5333 6000 5333 6000 4800 2400 1250
5600
6317
Chapter 7-14
Learning Curves
Studies have shown that human performance usually improves when a task is repeated In general, performance improves by a fixed percent each time production doubles More specifically, each time the output doubles, the worker hours per unit decrease to a fixed percentage of their previous value That percentage is called the learning rate The project manager should take the learning curve into account for any task where labor is significant
Chapter 7-17
Other Factors
Anywhere from about three-fifths to five-sixths of projects fail to meet their time, cost, and/or specification objectives There are several common causes:
Arbitrary and impossible goals Scope creep Wildly optimistic estimates in order to influence the project selection process Changes in resource prices Failure to include an allowance for waste and spoilage Bad luck
Chapter 7-18
Chapter 7-19
Summary
The intent of a budget is to communicate organizational policy concerning the organizations goals and priorities There are a number of common budgeting methods: top-down, bottom-up, and the program budget Firms will fund projects whose returns cover direct but not full costs in order to achieve long-run strategic goals of the organization
Chapter 7-20
Summary
If projects include repetitive tasks with significant human input, the learning phenomenon should be taken into consideration when preparing cost estimates The learning curve is based on the observation that the amount of time required to produce one unit decreases a constant percentage every time the output doubles
Chapter 7-21
Summary
Other major factors, in addition to learning, that should be considered when making project cost estimates are inflation, differential changes in the cost factors, waste and spoilage, personnel replacement costs, and contingencies for unexpected difficulties
Chapter 7-22
Questions?
Chapter 7-23
Picture Files
Figure 7-1
Figure 7-2
Figure 7-4
Table Files
Copyright 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction or translation of this work beyond that permitted in Section 117 of the 1976 United States Copyright Act without the express written permission of the copyright owner is unlawful. Request for further information should be addressed to the Permissions Department, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. The purchaser may make back-up copies for his/her own use only and not for distribution or resale. The Publisher assumes no responsibility for errors, omissions, or damages, caused by the use of these programs or from the use of the information contained herein.