Clinical Manifestations and Treatment of Hypokalemia
Clinical Manifestations and Treatment of Hypokalemia
Clinical Manifestations and Treatment of Hypokalemia
www.uptodate.com
Last literature review version 17.1: January 2009 | This topic last updated:
January 24, 2009 (More)
Potassium replacement is primarily indicated when potassium has been lost; it is also
given in some cases, such as hypokalemic periodic paralysis, when hypokalemia is due
to redistribution into the cells. However, potassium is given very cautiously in the latter
setting, if at all, since the hypokalemia is transient and the administration of too much
potassium can lead to rebound hyperkalemia when the process is corrected and
potassium moves back out of the cells.
Optimal therapy is dependent upon the severity of the potassium deficit. In addition,
somewhat different considerations are required to minimize continued urinary losses
due to diuretic therapy, or less often, primary hyperaldosteronism.
The clinical manifestations and treatment of hypokalemia will be reviewed here. The
causes and diagnosis of hypokalemia are discussed separately. ( See "Causes of
hypokalemia" and see "Diagnosis of hypokalemia" ).
Severe muscle weakness or paralysis — Muscle weakness usually does not occur
at potassium concentrations above 2.5 meq/L if the hypokalemia develops slowly [ 3] .
However, significant weakness may occur with sudden decreases, as occurs in
hypokalemic periodic paralysis, although the cause of weakness in this disorder may
be more complex. ( See "Myopathies of systemic disease" , section on Hypokalemic
myopathy).
There is large variability in the actual potassium concentrations that are associated
with progression of ECG changes. In a carefully controlled trial of thiazide therapy
(hydrochlorothiazide 50 mg/day), there was a two-fold increase in ventricular
arrhythmias (as detected by Holter monitoring) in the small proportion of patients in
whom the plasma potassium concentration fell to or below 3.0 meq/L [ 4] .
EVALUATION
Patient assessment — Monitoring of the ECG and muscle strength are indicated to
assess the functional consequences of the hypokalemia. At serum potassium
concentrations lower than 2.5 meq/L, severe muscle weakness, or marked
electrocardiographic changes are potentially life-threatening and require immediate
treatment. Immediate therapy is warranted if electrocardiographic changes or
peripheral neuromuscular abnormalities are present. ( See "ECG tutorial: Miscellaneous
diagnoses" , section on hypokalemia).
One problem with the assessment of serum potassium is that it is often unclear
whether the hypokalemia represents a chronic or an acute condition. A careful history
to assess the probable etiology of the hypokalemia is important. ( See "Diagnosis of
hypokalemia" ).
In chronic hypokalemia, a potassium deficit of 200 to 400 meq is required to lower the
serum potassium concentration by 1 meq/L [ 17] . Once the serum potassium level falls
to approximately 2 meq/L, continued potassium losses will not produce much more
hypokalemia due to release of potassium from the cell stores.
These estimates assume that there is a normal distribution of potassium between the
cells and the extracellular fluid, that is, there is no concurrent acid-base abnormality.
The most common settings in which this estimation does not apply is diabetic
ketoacidosis or nonketotic hyperglycemia, and in other conditions such as hypokalemic
periodic paralysis. ( See "Causes of hypokalemia" , section on Increased entry into
cells).
TREATMENT
Oral potassium chloride can be given in crystalline form ( salt substitutes), as a liquid,
or in a slow-release tablet or capsule. Salt substitutes contain 50 to 65 meq per level
teaspoon; they are safe, well tolerated and much cheaper than the other preparations,
and thus may be an option if cost is a concern [ 21] . In comparison, potassium
chloride solutions are often unpalatable, and the slow-release preparations can in rare
cases cause ulcerative or stenotic lesions in the gastrointestinal tract due to the local
accumulation of high concentrations of potassium [ 22] .
A saline rather than a dextrose solution is recommended for initial therapy, since the
administration of dextrose can lead to a transient 0.2 to 1.4 meq/L reduction in the
serum potassium concentration, particularly if only 20 meq/L of potassium chloride is
provided [ 2,24] . This effect, which can induce arrhythmias in susceptible patients
(such as those taking digitalis) [24] , is mediated by dextrose-stimulated release of
insulin, which drives potassium into the cells by enhancing the activity of the cellular
Na-K-ATPase pump [ 24,25] .
In patients who cannot tolerate large volumes of fluid, more concentrated solutions
(200 to 400 meq/L) can be infused into large veins in patients with severe symptomatic
hypokalemia [ 26-28] . The rate at which this can be given and the potential
complications of overly rapid therapy are described below. ( See "Severe hypokalemia"
below).
Ongoing losses and the steady state — The following recommendations for
potassium replacement assume that there are no ongoing losses (eg, vomiting,
diarrhea, nasogastric suction, diuretic therapy) and that the patient does not have a
chronic potassium wasting condition such as diuretic therapy, primary aldosteronism,
or Gitelman's disease:
Stable patients with chronic diuretic therapy (at a fixed dose), primary
aldosteronism, or Gitelman's syndrome typically do not develop progressive
hypokalemia because their increased urinary potassium losses are quickly
balanced by hypokalemia-induced potassium retention,establishing a new
steady state in which potassium output matches potassium intake, albeit at a
lower than normal plasma potassium concentration. In such patients, usual rates
of potassium repletion produce only modest elevations in serum potassium. As
soon as the serum potassium rises, there is less hypokalemia-induced
potassium retention and most of the administered potassium is excreted in the
urine. (See "Clinical features of primary aldosteronism" , section on The steady
state, and see "The steady state" ).
Treatment in this setting is directed toward replacing the lost potassium and toward
treating the underlying disorder (such as vomiting or diarrhea). Treatment is usually
started with 10 to 20 meq of potassium chloride given two to four times per day (20 to
80 meq per day), depending on the severity of hypokalemia and on whether
hypokalemia developed acutely or is chronic.
Potassium repletion is most easily done orally. The serum potassium concentration can
transiently rise acutely by as much as 1 to 1.5 meq/L after an oral dose of 40 to 60
meq, and by 2.5 to 3.5 meq/L after 135 to 160 meq [ 32,33] ; the serum potassium
concentration will then fall back towards baseline, as most of the exogenous potassium
will then be taken up by the cells [ 34] . TA patient with a serum potassium
concentration of 2 meq/L, for example, may have a 400 to 800 meq potassium deficit
[17] .
Thus, potassium chloride can be given orally in doses of 40 to 60 meq, three to four
times/day. If tolerated, this should be continued until the serum potassium
concentration is persistently above 3.0 to 3.5 meq/L, and/or symptoms resolve;
thereafter, the dose and frequency of administration can be reduced to avoid gastric
irritation. (See "Mild to moderate hypokalemia" above ).
The necessity for aggressive intravenous potassium replacement has been reported
primarily in patients with diabetic ketoacidosis or nonketotic hyperglycemia who
present with hypokalemia due to marked potassium losses [ 35] . Treatment with
insulin and fluids will exacerbate the hypokalemia. Fortunately, these patients are also
quite volume depleted; thus, 40 to 60 meq/L of potassium chloride in half-isotonic
saline can usually be given to supply potassium and volume repletion, with a low risk
of pulmonary congestion in this setting.
Although isotonic saline is generally the initial replacement fluid used in treating
diabetic ketoacidosis or nonketotic hyperglycemia, the addition of potassium will make
this a hypertonic fluid (since potassium is as osmotically active as sodium), thereby
delaying reversal of the hyperosmolality that is primary responsible for neurologic
symptoms in this disorder. On the other hand, the combination of 40 to 60 meq of
potassium in half-isotonic saline is almost the osmotic equivalent of isotonic saline.
(See "Treatment of diabetic ketoacidosis and hyperosmolar hyperglycemic state in
adults").
General issues
The reduction in serum potassium allows only a rough approximation of whole body
losses. A fall in serum potassium from 4.0 to 3.0 meq/L represents an approximate
loss of 200 to 400 meq of potassium. ( See "Potassium deficit" above ).
This estimation does not apply to patients with transcellular potassium redistribution.
As examples:
Patients with diabetic ketoacidosis may have normal (or even high) plasma
potassium levels despite substantial potassium losses due to transcellular
potassium shifts, and the administration of insulin and fluids leads to a rapid
reduction in the serum potassium concentration and, in many cases,
hypokalemia. ( See "Treatment of diabetic ketoacidosis and hyperosmolar
hyperglycemic state in adults" ).
Acute replacement — The rapidity and method of potassium repletion is based upon
the severity of hypokalemia, the presence of associated conditions, the presence or
absence of signs and symptoms (cardiac conduction abnormalities, muscle weakness),
and whether continued losses are expected.
The following recommendations for the rate of potassium replacement assume that
there are no ongoing losses (eg, vomiting, diarrhea, nasogastric suction, diuretic
therapy) and that the patient does not have a chronic potassium wasting condition such
as diuretic therapy, primary aldosteronism, or Gitelman's disease. ( See "Ongoing
losses and the steady state" above ).
Patients with heart disease (particularly if they are taking digitalis or undergoing
cardiac surgery) or advanced cirrhosis may require more aggressive repletion. ( See
"Mild to moderate hypokalemia" above ).
REFERENCES
1. Rose, BD, Post, TW, Clinical Physiology of Acid-Base and Electrolyte Disorders,
5th ed, McGraw-Hill, New York, 2001, pp. 836-857.
2. Gennari, FJ. Hypokalemia. N Engl J Med 1998; 339:451.
3. Rose, BD, Post, TW, Clinical Physiology of Acid-Base and Electrolyte Disorders,
5th ed, McGraw-Hill, New York, 2001, pp. 857-863.
4. Siegel, D, Hulley, SB, Black, DM, et al. Diuretics, serum and intracellular
electrolyte levels, and arrhythmias in hypertensive men. JAMA 1992; 267:1083.
5. Struthers, AD, Whitesmith, R, Reid, JL. Prior thiazide treatment increases
adrenaline-induced hypokalemia. Lancet 1983; 1:1358.
6. Lipworth, BJ, McDevitt, DG, Struthers, AD. Prior treatment with diuretic
augments the hypokalemic and electrocardiographic effects of inhaled albuterol.
Am J Med 1989; 86:653.
7. Tsuji, H, Venditti, FJ Jr, Evans, JC, et al. The associations of levels of serum
potassium and magnesium with ventricular premature complexes (the
Framingham Heart Study). Am J Cardiol 1994; 74:237.
8. Hoes, AW, Grobbee, DE, Lubsen, JL, et la. Diuretics, beta blockers, and the risk
for sudden cardiac death in hypertensive patients. Ann Intern Med 1995;
123:481.
9. Shintani, S, Shliigai, T, Tsukagoshi, H. Marked hypokalemic rhabdomyolysis with
myoglobinuria due to diuretic treatment. Eur Neurol 1991; 31:396.
10. Dominic, JA, Koch, M, Guthrie, GP, Galla, JH. Primary aldosteronism presenting
as myoglobinuric acute renal failure. Arch Intern Med 1978; 138:1433.
11. Rubini, ME. Water excretion in potassium-deficient man. J Clin Invest 1961;
40:2215.
12. Tizianello, A, Garibotto, G, Robaudo, C, et al. Renal ammoniagenesis in humans
with chronic potassium depletion. Kidney Int 1991; 40:772.
13. Capasso, G, Jaeger, P, Giebisch, G, et al. Renal bicarbonate reabsorption in the
rat. II. Distal tubule load dependence and effect of hypokalemia. J Clin Invest
1987; 80:409.
14. Riemenschneider, T, Bohle, A. Morphologic aspects of low-potassium and
low-sodium nephropathy. Clin Nephrol 1983; 19:271.
15. Torres, VE, Young, WF, Jr, Offord, KP, Hattery, RR. Association of hypokalemia,
aldosteronism, and renal cysts. N Engl J Med 1990; 322:345.
16. Berl, T, Linas, SL, Aisenbrey, GA, Anderson, RJ. On the mechanism of polyuria
in potassium depletion. The role of polydipsia. J Clin Invest 1977; 60:620.
17. Sterns, RH, Cox, M, Feig, PU, Singer, I. Internal potassium balance and the
control of the plasma potassium concentration. Medicine (Baltimore) 1981;
60:339.
18. Adrogué, HJ, Lederer, ED, Suki, WN, Eknoyan, G. Determinants of plasma
potassium levels in diabetic ketoacidosis. Medicine (Baltimore) 1986; 65:163.
19. Villamil, MF, DeLand, EC, Henney, RP, Maloney, JV. Anion effects on cation
movements during correction of potassium depletion. Am J Physiol 1975;
229:161.
20. Schwartz, WB, Van Ypersele, de Strihou, Kassirer, JP. Role of anions in
metabolic alkalosis and potassium deficiency. N Engl J Med 1968; 279:630.
21. Sopko, JA, Freeman, RM. Salt substitutes as a source of potassium. JAMA 1977;
238:608.
22. Aselton, PJ, Jick, H. Short-term follow-up study of wax matrix potassium
chloride in relation to gastrointestinal bleeding. Lancet 1983; 1:184.
23. Kopyt, N, Dalal, F, Narins, RG. Renal retention of potassium in fruit (letter). N
Engl J Med 1985; 313:582.
24. Kunin, AS, Surawicz, B, Sims, EA. Decrease in serum potassium concentration
and appearance of cardiac arrhythmias during infusion of potassium with
glucose in potassium-depleted patients. N Engl J Med 1962; 266:228.
25. Clausen, T, Everts, ME. Regulation of the Na,K-pump in skeletal muscle. Kidney
Int 1989; 35:1.
26. Kruse, JA, Carlson, RW. Rapid correction of hypokalemia using concentrated
intravenous potassium chloride infusions. Arch Intern Med 1990; 150:613.
27. Hamill, RJ, Robinson, LM, Wexler, HR, Moote, C. Efficacy and safety of
potassium infusion therapy in hypokalemic critically ill patients. Crit Care Med
1991; 19:694.
28. Kruse, JA, Clark, VL, Carlson, RW, Geheb, MA. Concentrated potassium chloride
infusions in critically ill patients with hypokalemia. J Clin Pharmacol 1994;
34:1077.
29. Wahr, JA, Parks, R, Boisvert, D, et al. Preoperative serum potassium levels and
perioperative outcomes in cardiac surgery patients. Multicenter Study of
Perioperative Ischemia Research Group. JAMA 1999; 281:2203.
30. Shapiro, W, Taubert, K. Hypokalaemia and digoxin-induced arrhythmias. Lancet
1975; 2:604.
31. Mann, JF, Yi, QL, Sleight, P, et al. Serum potassium, cardiovascular risk, and
effects of an ACE inhibitor: results of the HOPE study. Clin Nephrol 2005;
63:181.
32. Keith, NM, Osterberg, AE, Burchell, HB. Some effects of potassium salts in man.
Ann Intern Med 1942; 16:879.
33. Nicolis, GL, Kahn, T, Sanchez, A, Gabrilove, JL. Glucose-induced hyperkalemia
in diabetic subjects. Arch Intern Med 1981; 141:49.
34. Sterns, RH, Feig, PU, Pring, M, et al. Disposition of intravenous potassium in
anuric man: A kinetic analysis. Kidney Int 1979; 15:651.
35. Abramson, E, Arky, R. Diabetic acidosis with initial hypokalemia. Therapeutic
implications. JAMA 1966; 196:401.
36. Rose, BD, Post, TW, Clinical Physiology of Acid-Base and Electrolyte Disorders,
5th ed, McGraw-Hill, New York, 2001, pp. 870-875.
37. Seftel, HC, Kew, MC. Early and intensive potassium replacement in diabetic
acidosis. Diabetes 1966; 15:694.
38. Lu, KC, Hsu, YJ, Chiu, JS, et al. Effects of potassium supplementation on the
recovery of thyrotoxic periodic paralysis. Am J Emerg Med 2004; 22:544.
GRAPHICS
Hypokalemia
Congenital Antihistamines
Other - Spiramycin,
chloroquine, halofantrine
mefloquine
Molasses Spinach
Seaweed Tomatoes
Cantaloupe
Kiwis
Oranges
Mangos
Meats
Ground beef
Steak
Pork
Veal
Lamb
Grade 2B recommendation
A Grade 2B recommendation is a weak recommendation;
alternative approaches may be better for some patients under
some circumstances.
Explanation:
Grade B means that the best estimates of the critical benefits and risks come
from randomized, controlled trials with important limitations (eg, inconsistent
results, methodologic flaws, imprecise results, extrapolation from a different
population or setting) or very strong evidence of some other form. Further
research (if performed) is likely to have an impact on our confidence in the
estimates of benefit and risk, and may change the estimates.
Recommendation grades
1. Strong recommendation: Benefits clearly outweigh the risks and burdens
(or vice versa) for most, if not all, patients
2. Weak recommendation: Benefits and risks closely balanced and/or
uncertain
Evidence grades
A. High-quality evidence: Consistent evidence from randomized trials, or
overwhelming evidence of some other form
B. Moderate-quality evidence: Evidence from randomized trials with
important limitations, or very strong evidence of some other form
C. Low-quality evidence: Evidence from observational studies, unsystematic
clinical observations, or from randomized trials with serious flaws
For a complete description of our grading system, please see the UpToDate
editorial policy which can be found by clicking "About UpToDate" and then
selecting "Policies".
Grade 1B recommendation
A Grade 1B recommendation is a strong recommendation, and
applies to most patients. Clinicians should follow a strong
recommendation unless a clear and compelling rationale for an
alternative approach is present.
Explanation:
Grade B means that the best estimates of the critical benefits and risks come
from randomized, controlled trials with important limitations (eg, inconsistent
results, methodologic flaws, imprecise results, extrapolation from a different
population or setting) or very strong evidence of some other form. Further
research (if performed) is likely to have an impact on our confidence in the
estimates of benefit and risk, and may change the estimates.
Recommendation grades
1. Strong recommendation: Benefits clearly outweigh the risks and burdens
(or vice versa) for most, if not all, patients
2. Weak recommendation: Benefits and risks closely balanced and/or
uncertain
Evidence grades
A. High-quality evidence: Consistent evidence from randomized trials, or
overwhelming evidence of some other form
B. Moderate-quality evidence: Evidence from randomized trials with
important limitations, or very strong evidence of some other form
C. Low-quality evidence: Evidence from observational studies, unsystematic
clinical observations, or from randomized trials with serious flaws
For a complete description of our grading system, please see the UpToDate
editorial policy which can be found by clicking "About UpToDate" and then
selecting "Policies".
© 2009 UpToDate, Inc. All rights reserved. | Subscription and License Agreement