World Cotton Research Conference-5
World Cotton Research Conference-5
World Cotton Research Conference-5
2 3
1.00
0.84 1.00
0.80 0.80 1
0.88 0.83 0
0.80 0.83 0
0.76 0.77 0
0.82 0.84 0
0.87 0.80 0
0.88 0.84 0
0.79 0.79 0
0.85 0.91 0
0.89 0.85 0
0.88 0.81 0
0.85 0.92 0
0.86 0.82 0
0.86 0.90 0
0.76 0.79 0
0.85 0.78 0
ON
y shows that
is considera
The genetic
s using withi
s can be use
d with phen
on studies wh
World Cot
TABL
4 5 6
.00
.75 1.00
.74 0.87 1.0
.64 0.70 0.72
.79 0.86 0.8
.79 0.84 0.8
.86 0.83 0.7
.80 0.86 0.7
.82 0.84 0.82
.85 0.84 0.8
.88 0.84 0.8
.80 0.84 0.84
.73 0.91 0.84
.80 0.90 0.8
.70 0.83 0.7
.74 0.85 0.7
t considerab
able scope fo
c diversity da
in cluster don
d for hybrid
otypic diver
hich will enab
tton Research C
E 1: SAMPLE SIMILARIT
7 8
0
2 1.00
6 0.54 1.00
5 0.68 0.83
3 0.71 0.84
9 0.53 0.90
2 0.71 0.83
1 0.62 0.86
1 0.68 0.82
4 0.73 0.85
4 0.66 0.81
7 0.71 0.83
7 0.63 0.85
7 0.58 0.80
ble variability
for developm
ata also help
nor or with m
d developmen
rsity analysi
ble us to iden
Conference on T
Fig. 2
TY MATRIX GENERATED
9 10
1.00
0.86 1.00
0.74 0.82 1
0.82 0.83 0
0.80 0.79 0
0.83 0.89 0
0.78 0.80 0
0.85 0.76 0
0.80 0.76 0
0.78 0.75 0
0.82 0.84 0
y exists in th
ment of super
ps in improv
maximum si
nt with dive
is may lead
ntify the mar
Technologies fo
BY NTYSY SPC SOF
11 12 1
1.00
0.79 1.00
0.77 0.85 1.0
0.84 0.82 0.8
0.78 0.84 0.8
0.75 0.88 0.8
0.80 0.88 0.9
0.80 0.80 0.7
0.79 0.87 0.7
he proprietar
rior cotton li
ement of sel
milarity. On
rse gene poo
d to the dev
rker-trait ass
or Prosperity
FTWARE
3 14 15
00
85 1.00
87 0.82 1.00
88 0.78 0.85
90 0.82 0.90
76 0.75 0.76
77 0.84 0.78
ry cotton ger
ines and hyb
lected lines f
n the other ha
ol. Also, gen
velopment o
ociations at t
16 17
0
5 1.00
0 0.92 1.00
6 0.73 0.80
8 0.82 0.83
rmplasm wh
brids with hi
for specific
and genetical
netic diversit
f haplotype
the germplas
18 19
1.00
0.74 1.00
hich shows
igher yield
agronomic
lly distinct
ty analysis
maps for
sm level.
Genetic Diversity Analysis in Cotton Germplasm 7
Fig. 3: Chromatogram File Generated by ABI3730 96 Well Capillary Electrophoresis
REFERENCES
[1] Blenda, A., Scheffler J., Scheffler B., Palmer M., Lacape J. M., Yu J. Z., Jesudurai C., Jung S., Muthukumar, S.,
Yellambalase, P., Ficklin, S., Staton, M., Eshelman, R., Ulloa, M., Saha, S., Burr, B, Liu, S., Zhang, T., Fang, D., Pepper,
A., Kumpatla, S., Jacobs, J., Tomkins, J., Cantrell, R., and Main, D. (2006). CMD: a Cotton Microsatellite Database
resource for Gossypium genomics. BMC Genomics 7:132
[2] Iqbal, M.J., Aziz, N., Saeed, N.A., Zafar, Y., Malik, K.A. (1997). Genetic diversity evaluation of some cotton varieties by
RAPD analysis. Theor. Appl. Genet. 94: 139-144.
[3] Karp, A. (2002). The new genetic era: will it help us in managing genetic diversity? In: Managing
[4] Plant Genetic diversity. (Eds.): J.M.M. Engels, V.R. Rao, A.H.D. Brown and M.T. Jackson.
[5] International Plant Genetic Resources Institute, Rome, Italy, 43-56.
[6] Krishnasamy Thiyagu, Narayanan Manikanda Boopathi, Nagasamy Nadarajan, Ayyanar Gopikrishnan, Pandi Selvakumar,
Santoshkumar Magadum and Rajasekar Ravikesavan. (2011) Sampling and exploitation of genetic variation exist in locally
adapted accessions using phenotypic and molecular markers for genetic improvement of cotton. Genecon. 10: 129-153.
[7] Morgante, M, Hanafey, M. and Powell, W. (2002). Microsatellites are preferentially associated with nonrepetitive DNA in
plant genomes. Nat. Genet. 30: 194-200
[8] Saha, S., Wu, J., Jenkins, J.N., McCarty, J.C. Jr, et al. (2004). Effect of chromosome substitutions from Gossypium
barbadense L.3-79 into G. hirsutum L. TM-1 on agronomic and fiber traits. J. Cotton Sci. 8: 162-169.
[9] Turkoglu, Z., Bilgener, S., Ercisli, S., Bakir, M., et al., (2010). Simple sequence repeat-based assessment of genetic
relationships among Prunus rootstocks. Genet. Mol. Res. 9: 2156-2165.
[10] Ulloa, M., Brubaker, C. and Chee, P. (2007). Cotton. In: Genome Mapping & Molecular Breeding (Kole C, ed.). Vol. 6.
Technical Crops Springer, New York.
[11] Weir, B. S. (1990). Genetic data analysis: methods for discrete population genetic data. Sinauer Associates, Inc. publishers.
Sunderland, Massachusetts. 377.
[12] Zhang, Y., Wang, X.F., Li, Z.K., Zhang G.Y. and Ma Z.Y, (2011). Assessing genetic diversity of cotton cultivars using
genomic and newly developed expressed sequence tag-derived microsatellite markers. Gen. Mol. Res. 10 (3): 1462-1470.
Coefficient
0.01 0.07 0.14 0.20 0.26
100MW
1
122
111
119
190
11
100
127
103
105
136
145
32
99
163
156
102
161
74
98
5
88
113
133
134
148
132
191
131
6
135
8
44
125
165
117
143
164
53
166
40
48
182
169
115
108
150
118
140
141
104
121
178
97
157
186
106
107
129
158
C for 45 s,
57C for 45 s, 72C for 60 s; 72C for 5 min; 4C for preservation. Amplified DNA fragments were
resolved in 6% denatured polyacrylamide gel [(acryl amide: bisacrylamide (19:1)] and stained with silver
nitrate.
We employed 658 SSR primers including BNL, NAU, JESPR and CIR etc., for the identification of
polymorphism between the two parents. The polymorphic primers were used to screen the bulked low
and high fibre strength DNA samples and selected primers were subsequently used to genotype the F
2
individuals. Only unambiguous distinct bands were scored. QTLs for cotton fibre strength in F
2
population were identified using MAPMAKER 2.0 and QTL CARTOGRAPHER (version 1.15)
respectively. The SSR markers associated with the fibre strength QTL were used in the backcross and
modified backcross breeding program.
Genotyping the BC and MBC Samples
Marker-assisted selection was conducted for every generation of backcrossing and modified backcrossing
with the markers associated with fibre QTLs based on the F
2
population. The markers covering the fibre
strength QTLs that were used in MAS are RAS 72, RAS 158, RAS 215, RAS 223, RAS 224, RAS 230,
RAS 306 and RAS 304.The selection of plants with high fibre strength trait at every generation was
based on the markers and phenotypic data.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The first and foremost criterion to be considered in any breeding programme is the magnitude of the
genetic variability present in the base population which is prime requirement for starting a judicious
breeding programme for combining desirable characters into the elite lines. In the present investigation
the estimates of mean, range, phenotypic and genotypic coefficients of variation, heritability and genetic
advance as per cent of mean in F
2
generation are calculated and presented in Table 2. There were large
differences in the variances for most of the characters under study. The high variance (10.2) of fibre
strength character in F
2
population indicates that the presence of sufficient amount of variability which
had been generated in segregating populations (Pradeep and Sumalini, 2003). The distribution of fibre
strength in F
2
generations is given in Fig. 6. The distribution range of fibre strength in F
2
was between 18
g/tex to 36 g/ tex. The 27% of plants out of 475 plants showed moderate fibre strength (26-28 g/tex).
Furthermore, 3 plants in F
2
showed above 34 g/tex which was higher than the donor parent, suggesting
transgressive segregation for the trait. The variation and transgressive segregation observed for fibre
strength has practical implication for combining fibre strength in upland cotton.
TABLE 2: THE ESTIMATES OF MEAN, RANGE, HERITABILITY, GENETIC ADVANCE, GENETIC ADVANCE PER CENT OF MEAN, PCV AND GCV OF F
2
GENERATION (RC 64 X RC 45 SB)
Characters Mean Range Variance Heritability (h
2
%) GA GA% of Mean PCV % GCV%
Boll Weight (g) 3.3 1.9-4.6 0.4 84.5 1.3 39.1 19.0 17.5
Number of bolls/plant 67.5 32.0-127.0 445.8 46.9 43.5 64.4 31.3 21.4
Ginning percentage (%) 29.5 22.5-38.7 9.3 56.1 6.3 21.3 10.3 7.7
Lint index 3.8 1.9-6.6 0.6 8.9 1.6 41.5 20.1 6.0
Seed index 9.2 5.4-14.0 2.4 15.1 3.2 34.3 16.7 6.5
2.5% span length (mm) 32.5 26.1-38.1 6.3 83.1 5.2 15.9 7.7 7.0
Fibre strength (g/tex) 43.7 40.6-47.5 10.2 59.1 6.6 24.0 11.6 9.0
Uniformity ratio 27.4 18.4-36.1 1.7 78.4 2.7 6.1 3.0 2.6
Elongation 5.6 4.0-12.0 0.7 65.8 1.7 30.5 14.8 12.0
Micronaire 2.8 2.0-4.2 0.2 39.6 0.9 31.3 15.2 9.6
Seed cotton yield (g)/plant 152.5 82.3-266.7 2482.5 30.1 102.6 67.3 32.7 17.9
Although range can provide a preliminary idea about the variability but coefficient of variation is
reliable as it is independent of unit of measurement. The extent of variability as measured by PCV and
GCV also gives information regarding the relative amount of variation.
22 World Cotton Research Conference on Technologies for Prosperity
Fig. 5: Frequency Distribution of Fibre Strength Trait in F
2
Population (475 Plants)
The estimates of phenotypic coefficients of variation (PCV) ranged from 2.98 for fibre uniformity
ratio to 32.68 % for seed cotton yield per plant and the corresponding values for genotypic coefficients of
variation (GCV) were 2.64 % for fibre uniformity ratio and 21.83 % for number of bolls per plant (Table
2). The phenotypic coefficient of variation which measures total variation was found to be greater than
genotypic coefficient of variation for all the characters indicating some degree of environmental
influence on the traits.
It is not the magnitude of variation but the extent of heritable variation, which matters most for
achieving gains in selection programme. The coefficient of variation indicates only the extent of variation
for a character and does not discriminate the variability into heritable and non-heritable portion. The
heritability worked out in broad sense would suggest how far the variation is heritable and selection is
effective. A perusal of heritability estimates indicated that the characters such as boll weight, fibre length,
uniformity ratio and fibre elongation have high heritability (Table 2). Such high heritability estimates
have been found to be helpful in making selection of superior genotypes on the basis of phenotypic
performance for quantitative characters. The characters viz., number of bolls per plant, ginning
percentage, fibre strength, mircronaire and seed cotton yield per plant had moderate heritability. Though
the heritability estimates are the true indicators of genetic potentiality of the genotypes which can be used
as a tool for selection, changes in the values of the heritability due to fluctuations of the environmental
factors detract for total dependence on such estimates. However, heritability estimates when considered
in conjunction with the predicted genetic gain form a reliable tool for selection. They indicate the
expected genetic advance of a character in response to the certain selection pressure imposed on them
and also provide an idea about the gene action involved in the expression of various polygenic traits
involving several QTLs.
High heritability coupled with high genetic advance as per cent of mean was noticed for the
characters boll weight and elongation. This indicates that additive gene action was responsible for the
inheritance of these traits and the selection in the early generation could be fruitful in improving these
characters (Kumaresan, et. al., 2000). In contrast the characters lint index and seed index have low
heritability and high genetic advance as per cent of mean. The fibre strength character has moderate
heritability and high genetic advance as per cent of mean indicates that success through simple selection
could be expected in the early generation as this trait is having the additive gene action.
Marker-Assisted Selection (MAS) using Simple Sequence Repeats (SSR)
Based on limited DNA polymorphism in upland cotton for markers available to date, and limited
application of markers for cotton improvement, sound MAS breeding strategy is important for
incorporating QTLs associated with fibre traits are successfully used in crop improvement. We have
screened 658 SSR primers for the identification of polymorphism between the two parents. Of the 658
primer, 454 primers were polymorphic between the parents, 158 primers were polymorphic between
bulked low and high fibre strength samples (Fig. 6). Subsequently 158 polymorphic primers obtained in
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
1
8
2
0
2
0
2
2
2
2
2
4
2
4
2
6
2
6
2
8
2
8
3
0
3
0
3
2
3
2
3
4
3
4
3
6
3
6
3
8
F
r
e
q
u
e
n
c
y
i
n
%
Range
F2
bulked an
three min
Among th
and RAS
selection
phenotypi
M 1
1, 2
3 Bu
4, 5
M 1
B, H
1 to 1
17 to
M 1
B, H
1 to 1
11 to
Introgre
nalysis were
or QTLs for
hese markers
304) molec
in the BC
ic data are gi
Fig. 6: SSR
kb ladder
G.barbadens
ulked low fib
Bulked high
Fig. 7:
kb ladder
G.barbaden
6 Low fibre
46 High fib
Fig. 8: S
kb ladder
G.barbaden
0 Low fibre
25 High fib
ession of High F
used to geno
r fibre streng
, eight SSR (
cular marker
and MBC
iven in Fig. 1
R Screening Gener
se & G.hirsu
bre strength D
h fibre strengt
: SSR Profiles Gen
nse & G.hirs
e strength in
bre strength i
SSR Profiles Gener
nse & G.hirs
e strength in
bre strength i
Fibre Strength T
otype the 47
gth from the
(RAS 72, RA
rs associated
(Fig. 8).The
1 4.
rated for Bulked lo
utum
DNA of F
2
in
th DNA of F
nerated for F
2
Low
sutum
dividual sam
individual sa
rated for BC
1
F
8
low
sutum
dividual sam
individual sa
Trait to Upland C
75 number o
strain have b
AS 158, RAS
d with fiber
e number o
ow and High Fibre
ndividuals
(<
F
2
individuals
and High Fibre St
mples of F
2
(<
amples of F
2
w and high Fibre St
mples of BC
1
F
amples of BC
Cotton using Ma
f F2 individ
been identifi
S 215, RAS 2
strength QT
of selected p
Strength DNA of F
24 g/tex)
s
(< 30 g/tex)
rength Individuals
< 24 g/tex)
(> 30 g/tex)
trength Individuals
F
8
(< 27 g/te
C
1
F
8
(> 31 g/
arker-Assisted S
duals (Fig. 7)
ied and tagge
223, RAS 22
TLs were use
plants based
F
2
Samples with SS
)
s with the Primer R
s with the Primer
ex)
/tex)
Selection
). One major
ed with DNA
24, RAS 230
ed for mark
d on the ma
SR Primers
RAS 72
RAS 223
23
r QTL and
A markers.
0, RAS 306
ker-assisted
arkers and
24 World Cotton Research Conference on Technologies for Prosperity
TABLE 3: THE ESTIMATES OF MEAN, RANGE AND VARIANCE OF BACKCROSS POPULATIONS (RC 64 X (RC 64 X RC45 SB)
Generation Number of
bolls/Plant
Boll
Weight
(g)
Ginning
Percenta
ge (%)
Lint
Index
Seed
Index
2.5% Span
Length
(mm)
Fibre
Strength
(g/tex)
Uniformity
Ratio
Elongation Micronaire
BC1F1 Mean 58.0 3.8 31.8 5.0 10.7 35.1 27.2 48.9 6.1 3.5
Range 16.0-185.0 2.5-5.5 22.1-38.6 2.3-7.6 5.5-19.2 30.3-38.3 24.4-32.7 43.3-54.4 3.6-9.9 2.4-5.1
Variance 584.1 0.4 7.1 0.7 3.7 2.6 4.9 5.4 1.9 0.3
BC1F2 Mean 47.6 4.1 32.3 4.8 10.0 33.7 27.1 46.0 3.6 5.8
Range 20.0-146.0 2.9-5.2 26.8-36.0 3.3-6.4 7.2-11.5 27.1-37.1 26.0-30.7 41.1-49.4 2.5-4.7 4.1-8.7
Variance 576.6 0.2 5.8 0.6 1.1 5.0 1.1 3.9 0.3 1.0
BC1F3 Mean 42.4 3.0 31.4 4.3 9.3 30.4 30.5 46.8 4.6 4.1
Range 18.0-89.0 1.8-4.5 28.5-34.5 3.0-6.0 6.4-12.7 26.4-36.1 26.1-35.6 44.9-48.6 3.8-6.4 2.8-5.9
Variance 301.4 0.3 2.7 0.4 1.5 3.8 9.9 0.9 0.4 0.8
BC1F4 Mean 77.5 3.1 35.1 4.5 8.3 28.3 29.2 47.6 5.6 4.6
Range 36.0-142.0 2.0-4.9 27.8-39.8 3.0-6.5 6.0-11.3 24.4-31.0 26.3-34.1 44.7-49.1 4.3-7.9 2.2-5.8
Variance 625.2 0.3 4.8 0.4 1.1 1.6 3.4 0.5 0.4 0.6
BC1F5 Mean 105.7 3.0 34.2 4.2 8.1 28.7 29.4 47.0 5.5 4.3
Range 48.0-147.0 2.0-4.4 25.6-40.9 2.3-6.6 4.6-12.3 23.3-33.0 22.9-37.0 44.5-51.0 4.1-7.0 2.5-5.7
Variance 285.8 0.2 4.3 0.5 1.4 2.6 4.5 1.0 0.2 0.3
BC1F6 Mean 69.0 3.1 32.9 4.6 9.3 28.8 29.4 46.5 5.9 4.7
Range 13.0-152.0 1.8-4.7 26.9-39.8 2.8-6.5 5.2-13.8 25.7-32.3 24.5-33.6 44.2-49.4 4.7-7.6 2.5-5.9
Variance 554.4 0.3 3.9 0.5 1.7 2.0 3.5 0.9 0.2 0.4
BC1F7 Mean 88.3 3.4 33.3 5.0 10.0 28.9 30.0 48.0 5.5 4.9
Range 38.0-124.0 2.0-5.1 28.0-38.8 3.4-6.5 6.5-12.5 25.2-32.7 27.3-34.3 46.1-50.3 4.5-6.7 3.2-6.2
Variance 332.1 0.2 3.5 0.2 1.0 1.4 2.0 0.6 0.2 0.3
BC1F8 Mean 37.0 3.2 32.4 5.1 10.6 29.4 30.4 47.8 5.6 5.3
Range 12.0-78.0 2.0-4.6 22.3-38.4 2.9-6.7 7.0-13.4 26.4-41.0 26.9-35.7 42.8-50.8 4.3-6.9 3.0-6.1
Variance 134.5 0.2 5.5 0.4 1.0 2.7 3.2 0.9 0.2 0.3
RC 64
(Recurrent
Parent)
Mean 143.0 5.5 33.3 6.4 12.9 31.6 24.1 47.8 5.4 6.7
RC 45SB
(Donor
Parent)
Mean 127.0 3.6 28.4 4.7 12.0 38.0 33.1 49.7 2.8 4.8
The introgression of fibre strength character into upland cotton utilizing Gossypium barbadense as
donor through back cross and modified back cross method was done in the present investigation. Since
the fibre strength trait is controlled by several QTLs, the introgression was done by one back cross
followed by pedigree method. The mean, range and variance of observed characters for back cross
generations are given in the Table 3. The mean values of fibre strength in all the backcross generations
(BC
1
F
1
- BC
1
F
8
) indicates that the progenies are having high fibre strength (>27 g/tex). The high fibre
strength plants in each back cross generations were selected based on phenotypic selection coupled with
genotypic selection utilizing identified fibre strength linked SSR markers. The high fibre strength plants
with recurrent parent background were selected by utilizing molecular markers and phenotypic data. The
distribution range of fibre strength in backcross population (Fig. 9) reveals that in each generation the
number of plants fall under the high fibre strength group has been increased by the effective selection of
combining phenotypic and genotypic information. In BC
1
F
1
generation the frequency of plants fall under
high fibre strength (>30g/tex) is 14 per cent while in the BC
1
F
8
generation the frequency is 60 per cent.
Furthermore in BC
1
F
8
generation, the fibre strength values were ranged from 26.9 to 35.7 g/tex and seven
plants were having highest fibre strength values of above 34 g/tex. The high fibre strength plants in the
advance generations are have high phenotypic similarities to the recurrent parent type and thus the
molecular markers are effectively used in the selection of target alleles with high background of recurrent
parent.
Introgression of High Fibre Strength Trait to Upland Cotton using Marker-Assisted Selection 25
Fig. 9: Frequency Distribution of Fibre Strength Trait in Backcross Generations
The modified backcross method has been used for pyramiding the multiple traits into upland cotton
besides the introgression of fibre strength traits. The three upland cotton lines namely RC 62, RC 67 and
RC 92 were utilized as recurrent parent and high fibre strength BC
1
F
1
plants were used as donor plant to
develop a three modified back cross population (Figs. 2- 4) The advantage of this proposed modified
backcross breeding method was to obtain the more recurrent genome background with high fibre strength
as the frequency of the undesirable genes from the donor parents was reduced similar to the reported by
Li and Pan, 1990.
TABLE 4: THE ESTIMATES OF MEAN, RANGE AND VARIANCE OF MODIFIED BACKCROSS (I) POPULATIONS
Generation Number of
Bolls/Plant
Boll
Weight
(g)
Ginning
Percentage
(%)
Lint
Index
Seed
Index
2.5%
Span
Length
(mm)
Fibre
Strength
(g/tex)
Uniformity
Ratio
Elongation Micronaire
MBC1F1 Mean 90.1 4.6 31.1 5.0 11.1 35.6 26.5 44.7 4.8 3.4
Range 56.0-154.0 3.1-5.9 25.8-36.1 3.7-6.0 8.5-
14.1
32.2-38.4 25.0-28.6 43.2-46.6 3.6-6.0 2.6-4.1
Variance 501.1 0.5 5.6 0.4 1.6 2.4 0.5 0.6 0.3 0.2
MBC1F2 Mean 85.4 3.6 31.7 4.5 9.5 32.8 27.1 45.5 5.5 3.1
Range 19.0-176.0 2.1-5.6 2.2-42.4 2.9-6.9 3.55-
14.4
29.1-37.5 25.7-30.1 42.8-47.2 4.2-7.2 1.8-4.7
Variance 686.1 0.4 14.6 0.7 2.9 3.3 1.0 0.6 0.4 0.3
MBC1F3 Mean 99.4 3.8 32.5 4.8 10.0 32.4 28.1 44.4 5.4 3.5
Range 56.0-135.0 2.8-5.4 25.6-39.9 3.8-6.3 7.5-
14.4
28.3-38.1 25.9-30.8 42.0-47.2 4.1-7.1 2.6-4.4
Variance 301.7 0.3 6.4 0.3 1.5 3.4 1.2 1.0 0.3 0.2
MBC1F4 Mean 98.0 3.7 31.3 5.0 11.0 32.6 26.9 44.2 6.1 3.8
Range 45.0-142.0 2.0-6.5 23.4-37.7 2.9-7.0 6.3-
14.4
28.7-36.2 25.0-29.9 41.9-47.3 5.0-8.3 2.4-5.3
Variance 314.8 0.7 5.7 0.6 2.4 2.3 0.6 0.8 0.4 0.3
MBC1F5 Mean 89.0 4.0 33.9 5.3 10.4 33.3 28.4 45.8 5.4 3.6
Range 68.0-116.0 2-5.5 24.7-46.0 3.6-6.9 5-
14.25
30.6-35.8 25.7-31.8 44.0-47.2 4.3-6.5 2.6-4.5
Variance 111.6 0.4 5.6 0.5 1.8 1.5 1.9 0.5 0.2 0.2
MBC1F6 Mean 72.6 4.3 32.7 5.5 11.3 33.0 29.2 45.5 5.5 4.2
Range 19.0-122.0 2.9-5.9 21.4-36.9 4.1-7.4 8.35-
16.86
29.2-35.2 25.2-32.3 44.0-47.9 4.6-6.8 2.9-5.1
Variance 457.3 0.3 3.4 0.4 1.8 2.1 1.9 0.6 0.2 0.1
RC 64
(Recurrent
Parent)
Mean 143.0 5.5 33.3 6.4 12.9 31.6 24.1 47.8 6.7 5.4
RC 62
(Recurrent
Parent)
Mean 66.0 4.9 31.3 5.9 12.9 37.2 28.5 47.2 5.9 3.8
RC 45SB
(Donor
Parent)
Mean 127.0 3.6 28.4 4.7 12.0 38.0 33.1 49.7 2.8 4.8
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
1
8
2
0
2
0
2
2
2
2
2
4
2
4
2
6
2
6
2
8
2
8
3
0
3
0
3
2
3
2
3
4
3
4
3
6
3
6
3
8
F
r
e
q
u
e
n
c
y
i
n
%
Range
BC1F1
BC1F2
BC1F3
BC1F4
BC1F5
BC1F6
BC1F7
26 World Cotton Research Conference on Technologies for Prosperity
In the modified backcross generations the high fibre strength has been improved significantly. The
mean, range and variance of fibre strength for modified back cross generations are given in the Table 4 to
6. The fibre strength values of modified backcross generations ranged from 27.2 to 37.6 g/tex in MBC
1
F
4
(III), 25.3 to 32.4 g/tex in MBC
1
F
6
(I) and 24.4 to 32.8 g/tex in MBC
1
F
6
(II). The marker based selected
advanced progenies in the modified backcross generations are having uniform high fibre strength with
high similar phenotypic characters of the recurrent parents. The selected high strength progenies were
grouped into different staple length group in order to meet out the textile industry requirement of various
counts.
TABLE 5: THE ESTIMATES OF MEAN, RANGE AND VARIANCE OF MODIFIED BACKCROSS (II) POPULATIONS
Generation Number of
Bolls/Plant
Boll
Weight
(g)
Ginning
Percentage
(%)
Lint
Index
Seed
Index
2.5% span
Length
(mm)
Fibre
Strength
(g/tex)
Uniformity
Ratio
Elongation Micronaire
MBC1
F1
Mean 92.7 4.6 32.2 5.3 10.9 36.3 44.5 26.9 5.2 3.6
Range 38.0-178.0 3.8-6.5 28.7-36.2 4.3-6.3 5.8-13.3 33.0-39.7 43.2-46.0 26.0-29.3 4.4-7.5 3.0-4.5
Variance 921.6 0.4 3.6 0.3 2.2 3.4 0.5 0.7 0.4 0.2
MBC1
F2
Mean 93.6 3.8 32.5 4.8 10.0 33.4 26.8 45.3 5.3 3.4
Range 46.0-124.0 2.2-6.5 25.7-39.4 2.26-7.7 5.4-14.1 29.7-36.8 26.0-29.7 43.4-47.5 4.2-7.1 2.3-6.0
Variance 312.2 0.7 8.2 0.7 2.0 2.9 0.6 0.8 0.3 0.5
MBC1
F3
Mean 105.5 3.9 31.4 4.4 9.6 32.2 29.5 44.6 5.1 3.6
Range 76.0-128.0 2.7-5.8 27.4-36.6 3.6-5.6 7.7-12.1 28.5-34.8 26.9-33.0 42.9-46.8 4.1-6.5 2.8-4.7
Variance 185.8 0.7 4.4 0.2 1.0 1.9 3.0 0.8 0.4 0.3
MBC1
F4
Mean 97.1 4.0 28.7 4.6 11.3 33.5 28.6 43.8 5.6 3.5
Range 62.0-134.0 2.4-6.0 23.0-35.8 2.9-12.3 1.3-14.0 29.8-37.2 25.1-31.8 41.9-45.6 4.5-8.1 2.4-5.02
Variance 283.2 0.6 6.6 0.8 1.9 2.2 0.6 1.6 0.7 0.3
MBC1
F5
Mean 93.1 4.3 29.6 4.5 10.7 33.3 28.4 45.7 5.0 3.3
Range 68.0-120.0 2.3-5.9 24.2-47.5 3.0-5.9 5.8-13.8 29.5-37.3 21.9-32.0 43.7-47.7 3.9-6.5 2.2-4.3
Variance 200.7 0.5 7.9 0.4 2.1 2.6 2.7 0.7 0.3 0.2
MBC1
F6
Mean 56.2 4.2 29.6 4.6 11.0 33.4 29.2 45.3 4.8 3.8
Range 18.0-118.0 2.0-5.7 24.5-34.7 3.4-5.5 8.5-14.0 28.5-35.6 24.3-32.7 43.1-47.7 4.1-6.1 2.7-4.9
Variance 239.4 0.3 3.4 0.1 0.9 1.5 2.4 0.5 0.2 0.1
RC 64
(Recur
-rent
Parent)
Mean 143.0 5.5 33.3 6.4 12.9 31.6 24.1 47.8 6.7 5.4
RC 67
(Recur
-rent
Parent)
Mean 93.0 5.0 31.8 5.9 12.6 37.0 27.3 47.7 3.3 6.1
RC
45SB
(Donor
Parent)
Mean 127.0 3.6 28.4 4.7 12.0 38.0 33.1 49.7 2.8 4.8
TABLE 6: THE ESTIMATES OF MEAN, RANGE AND VARIANCE OF MODIFIED BACKCROSS (III) POPULATIONS
Generation Number of
Bolls/Plant
Boll
Weight
(g)
Ginning
Percentage
(%)
Lint
Index
Seed
Index
2.5% Span
Length
(mm)
Fibre
Strength
(g/tex)
Uniformity
Ratio
Elongation Micronaire
MBC1F1
Mean 76.5 4.9 32.4 5.8 12.2 34.9 26.9 45.4 4.3 3.7
Range 34.0-133.0 2.5-6.9 27.7-36.7 4.7-7.0 10.2-17.5 25.8-37.8 26.1-28.7 44.0-46.6 3.7-5.5 2.5-4.5
Variance 471.5 0.9 5.2 0.4 2.5 6.1 0.6 0.5 0.1 0.3
MBC1F2
Mean 97.0 4.1 34.2 5.5 10.6 33.3 27.4 45.8 4.8 4.9
Range 75.0-124.0 2.0-6.1 28.0-40.4 3.6-7.8 7.4-14.4 0.5-36.6 26.0-30.7 43.6-47.9 2.7-7.7 2.6-9.2
Variance 270.9 0.7 6.9 0.8 2.8 1.7 1.2 0.8 1.5 3.2
MBC1F3
Mean 74.3 4.2 33.7 5.6 10.9 31.0 29.1 46.9 5.4 4.0
Range 50.0-111.0 2.5-6.0 29.9-38.6 3.1-7.6 7.3-14.4 25.9-36.2 25.8-33.7 44.7-49.9 4.5-6.3 2.5-5.5
Variance 151.5 0.6 5.6 0.8 2.2 4.2 3.0 1.5 0.2 0.6
MBC1F4
Mean 51.5 4.2 33.1 5.8 11.7 31.3 31.4 46.7 5.4 4.9
Range 18.0-98.0 2.6-6.8 26.7-45.3 2.6-7.9 5.9-17.1 26.8-41.3 27.2-37.5 42.7-49.3 4.2-7.4 3.4-5.6
Variance 228.0 0.5 4.7 0.5 2.2 3.3 2.8 0.9 0.3 0.2
Table 6 (Contd.)
Introgression of High Fibre Strength Trait to Upland Cotton using Marker-Assisted Selection 27
Table 6 Contd.
RC 64
(Recurrent
Parent)
Mean 143.0 5.5 33.3 6.4 12.9 31.6 24.1 47.8 6.7 5.4
RC 92
(Recurrent
Parent)
Mean 78.0 5.6 34.6 7.6 14.3 35.8 28.4 49.2 6.6 3.6
RC 45SB
(Donor
Parent)
Mean 127.0 3.6 28.4 4.7 12.0 38.0 33.1 49.7 2.8 4.8
The application of DNA markers in backcross breeding program is dependant by the precision of
associated markers as well as by the cost effectiveness of marker-assisted selection. Marker-assisted
selection was found useful in developing genotypes with combinations of favourable alleles. The main
reasons supporting the utilization of molecular markers in cotton breeding programs are the 100%
heritability of the markers and their lower cost. Hence, the molecular markers were used in a
backcrossing scheme to improve the fibre strength traits in upland cotton efficiently.
Further to the present investigation the selected BC
1
F
8
and MBC
1
F
6
plants will be forwarded to the
next generation. The progeny test row may be conducted to select the best uniform high yielding
progenies with high fibre strength. Thus the developed introgressed high fibre strength upland cotton line
can be utilized for introgressing the fibre strength to improve the available elite parental lines through
marker assisted background selection to develop high fibre strength hybrids.
REFERENCES
[1] Allard, R.W. 1960. Principles of Plant Breeding. New York: John Willy and Sons, Inc.
[2] Burton, G.M. 1952. Quantitative inheritance in grasses. Proc. 6
th
Int. Grassland Cong., 1: 277-283.
[3] Chen, H., N. Qian., W.Z. Guo., Q.P. Song., B.C. Li., F.J. Deng., C.G. Dong and T.Z. Zhang (2009). Using three
overlapped RILs to dissect genetically clustered QTL for fibre strength on Chro.D8 in Upland cotton. Theor. Appl. Genet.,
119: 605612.
[4] Dudley, J.W. and R.H. Moll.1969. Interpretation and use of estimates of heritability and genetic variances in plant breeding.
Crop. Sci., 9(3):257-262.
[5] Johnson, H. W., H.F. Robinson and R.E. Comstock. 1955. Genotypic and phenotypic correlation in soybean and their
implications in selection. Agron. J., 47 : 477-483.
[6] Kohel, R.J.1999a. Cotton Improvement: A Perspective. Cotton World 1: (in press).
[7] Kohel, R.J.1999b. Cotton germplasm resources and the potential for improved fibre production and quality, In: A.S. Basra
(Ed.), Cotton fibres, pp. 167182. The Haworth Press, Inc, NY.
[8] Kumaresan, D., J. Ganesan and S. Ashok. 2000. Genetic analysis of qualitative characters in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum
L.). Crop Res. Ind., 19: 481-484.
[9] Lacape, J.M., T.B. Nguyen, B. Courtois, J. L. Belot, M. Giband, J. P. Gourlot, G. Gawryziak, S. Roques and B. Hau. 2005.
QTL analysis of cotton fibre quality using multiple Gossypium hirsutum x Gossypium barbadense backcross generations.
Crop. Sci., 45: 123-140.
[10] Li, W.H and J.J. Pan. 1990. Effect of modified backcross in breeding upland cotton cultivars. J. Nanjijng. Agri. univ., 13:
232-235.
[11] Lush, J.N. 1949. Animal breeding plans. The collegiate Press. Amer. Iowa Ed. 3.
[12] Pradeep, T. and K. Sumalini. 2003, Impact of mating systems on genetic variability in segregating generation of Asiatic
cotton (Gossypium sp.). Indian J. Genet., 63 : 143-147.
[13] Rahman,
S
and T.A. Malik. 2008. Genetic analysis of fibre traits in cotton. Int. J. Agri. Biol., 10: 209212.
[14] Singh, R.K and B.D. Chawdhury. 1985. Biometrical methods in quantitative genetic analysis, Kalyani Publications, New
Delhi.
[15] Zhang, H.B., Y. Li., B. Wang and P.W. Chee.2008. Recent advances in cotton genomics. Int. J. Plant. Genomics., 2008:
742304.
Predicting F
1
Performance from Their Parental
Charectaristics in Upland Cotton
(Gossypium hirsutum L.)
R.K. Gumber, Pankaj Rathore and J.S. Gill
Punjab Agricultural University Regional Station, Faridkot-151203, India
AbstractAttempts were made to find out whether various characteristics of parental lines viz., the genetic distance
between parents determined from Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism (AFLP) data, means of two parents
( P ) i.e. (P
1
+P
2
)/2, and absolute difference between the means of two parents (| P1 - P2 |) can be used to
predict the per se performance and economic heterosis of F
1
hybrids. The line PIL43 with okra leaves was most diverse
from other lines. It was found that genetic distance estimated from AFLP markers was not necessarily associated with
geographical diversity of the parents. The genetic distance was comparatively high between those parental lines that
differ largely for morphological characters. Genetic distance among parents determined from AFLP data proved to be a
good predictor of per se performance and economic heterosis of hybrids for seed cotton yield and boll weight. The means
of the parents were a good predictor for seed cotton yield and boll number. Significant association of absolute difference
between means of the two parents with per se performance and heterosis of F
1
hybrids was observed for seed cotton
yield, ginning out turn and seed index, suggesting that (| P1 - P2 |) is a good predictor for these traits.
INTRODUCTION
In India, for the first time in the world, two hybrids viz., Hybrid 4 (Patel 1971) and Varalaxmi (Katarki
1972) were released in Gujarat and Karnataka states, respectively. Thereafter many hybrids have been
released for commercial cultivation in the country. As a result, the cotton production in India increased
from 2.79 million bales (1 bale = 170 Kg lint) in 1947-48 to 295 million bales in 2009-10 (Anonymous
2010). With the development and cultivation of cotton hybrids, India has become cotton surplus state. In
India, hybrid cotton occupies about 80% of the total cotton area and contributes about 90% to national
annual production. Development of hybrid varieties is considered to be the quickest breeding method for
exploiting the heterosis to improve yield potential of crop plants (Nassimi et al., 2006; Radoev et al.,
2008 and Rameeh 2011). Genetic diversity between parents is important for hybrid breeding and for
maximum usefulness of a cross in pure line breeding. Generally it is assumed that crosses among
genetically diverse parents produce superior hybrids and progenies in the segregating generations
(Rameeh 2011). However, wide crosses suffer from poor adaptation in the target environment and
recombination losses owing to disruption of favourable epistatic gene combinations ( Schill et al., 1998).
Therefore, selection of suitable parents is one of the most important criteria used to allocate resources to
the most promising crosses and to increase the efficiency of breeding program. The identification of
promising F
1
crosses and superior segregants requires the development of a large number of crosses and
their multi-location field evaluation which is very laborious and resource demanding (Melchinger et al
1998). On prediction of test cross variance in maize, Melchinger et al., 1998) reported that the efficiency
of a breeding program may be enhanced if the breeding potential of F
1
crosses could be predicted in
advance. Molecular markers play an important role in crop improvement program and have been used
extensively to predict heterosis and F
1
performance (Gutirrez et al., 2002 and Selvaraj et al., 2010). The
usefulness of molecular genetic distance as a predictor of hybrid performance has been studied in several
crops. Genetic distance estimated using different molecular markers was found to have significant
associations with hybrid performance in maize (Lee et al., 1989; Smith et al., 1990; and Lanza et al.,
1997) and sunflower (Cheres et al., 2000). However, the association between marker based parental
genetic distance and hybrid performance has not been well documented in cotton. Therefore, the present
study was conducted to predict the mean performance and economic heterosis of F
1
hybrids from genetic
distances based on molecular markers, means of the parents ( P ), and the absolute difference between
means of the parents (| P1 - P2 |).
9
Predicting F
1
Performance from Their Parental Charectaristics in Upland Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) 57
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Field Experiment
In the present study, 16 F
1
crosses involving 11 diverse parents were evaluated in a randomized complete
block design with three replications at Punjab Agricultural University, Regional Station, Abohar in 2007.
Out of 11 parental lines, nine parents were either approved cultivars or improved lines under cultivation
in different states of India. The parental lines LH 1556, F 1861, F 505, F 846 and LH 900 were the
approved cultivars of American cotton and have been recommended for commercial cultivation in Punjab
state. LH 900 is an early maturing variety having short and compact plant type suitable for late sown
conditions. The parental lines PIL 43 and PIL 8 were the female and male parents, respectively of
approved cotton leaf curl disease resistant hybrid LH 144 (Gill et al., 2008). Likewise, RS2013 is an
approved cultivar from Rajasthan state and has medium size round bolls. GSH 4 is a sympodial cultivar
from Gujarat state, while HS 253 is an advanced line from Haryana. The cultivar Udangsuper is a jassid
susceptible non-descript variety having short stature plant and medium size bolls. The approved hybrid
LHH 144 and open- pollinated cultivar LH 1556 were included as standard checks. Each test hybrid was
accommodated in two rows plot of 8 m length. Rows were kept apart at 67.5 cm while plant-to-plant
spacing was maintained at 75 cm for hybrids and 60 cm for open-pollinated check cultivar.
Recommended agro-managements were carried out. The seeds were sown in the first week of May. The
observations were recorded on five competitive plants for seed cotton yield plant
-1
(g), number of bolls
plant
-1
, boll weight (g), seed index (g), and ginning out turn (%). The economic heterosis in terms of
improvement in per se performance of F1 hybrids over check hybrid LHH 144 and standard cultivar LH
1556 was calculated and expressed as percentage:
Economic Heterosis
F
1
mean
Check mean
x 100
Check mean
Karl Pearsons correlation coefficients (r) were computed as described by Panse and Sukhatame
(1967) to determine the relationship of F
1
performance and economic heterosis with different
characteristics of parental lines.
DNA Analysis
Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism (AFLP) analysis was performed as per the protocol given by
Vos et al., (1995) to study the molecular diversity among 11 cotton genotypes. For this purpose, a sample
of 250 ng aliquant of genomic DNA was digested with restriction enzymes EcoR1 and Mse1 (1.25 l
-1
)
with incubation at 37
0
C for two hours followed by 70
0
C for 15 minutes to inactivate the enzymes. In the
second step, the following adapter sequences were ligated to the restricted DNA fragments:
5-CTCGTAGACTGCGTACC
CATCTGACGCATGG-3
3-GACGATGAGTCCTGAG
TACTCAGGACTCAT-5
Seven primers were used for the pre-amplification and amplification with the following extensions:
ACT/CAC, ACC/CAC, ACG/CAG, ACT/CTC, AAC/CTG, ACG/CTG, and AGG/CTG,
Where the sequence before the slash refers to the primer extension for EcoR1 and that after the slash
refers to the primer extension for the Mse1. The PCR products were separated by electrophoresis on a
denaturing polyacrylamide gel. After drying, the gels were exposed to phospho-imager plates for 16
hours. The imager plates were scanned with a phospho-imager and polymorphic bands were coded in a
binary form by 1 and 0 for presence or absence in each genotype, respectively.
58 World Cotton Research Conference on Technologies for Prosperity
Estimation of Genetic Distances
The estimates of genetic distances (GD) between all possible combinations of 11 genotypes were
computed using the formula given by Nei and Li (1979):
GD
ij
= (N
i
+ N
j
2 N
ij
) / (N
i
+ N
j
), here GD
ij
is the genetic distance between two genotypes i and j,
Nij is the number of common bands between genotypes i and j, and N
i
and N
j
are the total number of
bands in genotypes i and j, respectively, related to all primer pairs considered in AFLP analysis. Thus GD
reflects the proportion of bands in common between two genotypes and may range from 0 (identical
profiles for two genotypes) to 1 (no common bands).
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Estimation of Genetic Distance
The estimation of genetic distances between parental lines using AFLP markers ranged from 0.111
between parental lines F 1861 and Udangsuper to 0.705 between PIL 43 and PIL 8 (Table 1). PIL 43 is a
female parent of an approved hybrid LHH 144 and this line has okra type narrow leaves with deep lobes.
Its bolls are ovate and of very big just like the hybrid LHH 144. On the contrary PIL 8 is the male parent
of hybrid LHH 144 with medium size normal green leaves and elliptic bolls. The genetic distance was
also high (0.679) between PIL43 and Udangsuper. Udangsuper is a local collection from the farmers
field. It has small normal green leaves with medium size round bolls. It has high tolerance to bollworms.
The high genetic distance was reported between parents LH 1556 and GSH 4 (0.52). Low genetic
distance was observed between the parents of LH 1556 and Udangsuper, GSH 4 and Udangsuper,
LH1556 and PIL8, F1861 and PIL8, GSH4 and PIL8, F505 and PIL8, HS253 and GSH4 and Udangsuper
and HS253 (Table 1). There was no association between genetic distance estimated from AFLP markers
and geographical diversity of the parents. The genetic distance was comparatively high between those
parental lines that differ largely for morphological characters.
TABLE 1: ESTIMATES OF GENETIC DISTANCE (GD), MEANS OF THE PARENTS ( P ) AND ABSOLUTE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN MEANS OF PARENTS (| P1 - P2 |) FOR DIFFERENT CHARACTERS
Cross/hybrid Genetic
Distance
(GD)
Seed Cotton
Yield plant
-1
(g)
Number
of Bolls Plant
-1
Boll Weight
(g)
Ginning Out
Turn
%
Seed Index
Mean
| P1 -
P2 |
Mean
| P1 -
P2 |
Mean
| P1 -
P2 |
Mean
| P1 -
P2 |
Mean
| P1 -
P2 |
LH1556x Udangsuper 0.147 105.5 71 34.0 22 2.96 0.11 32.1 -0.5 9.0 1.1
F1861 x Udangsuper 0.111 87.5 35 31.5 17 3.10 0.40 32.5 0.3 8.8 0.2
PIL43 x Udangsuper 0.679 80.0 20 26.0 6 3.50 1.20 32.1 -0.4 9.0 -1.0
GSH4 x Udangsuper 0.131 67.5 -5 23.5 1 3.25 0.70 32.9 1.1 8.6 -0.2
LH900 x Udangsuper 0.281 71.0 2 26.0 6 3.00 0.20 32.6 0.5 8.5 -0.9
F505 x Udangsuper 0.118 79.0 18 28.5 11 2.95 0.10 32.1 -0.4 8.4 0.6
LH1556 x PIL8 0.111 113.0 56 7.5 15 3.07 -1.19 32.6 -1.6 8.5 2.0
F1861x PIL8 0.153 95.0 20 35.0 10 3.75 -0.90 33.0 -0.8 8.6 1.1
PIL43 x PIL8 0.705 87.5 5 29.5 -1 4.15 -0.10 32.7 -1.5 8.8 -0.1
GSH4 x PIL8 0.160 75.0 -20 27.0 -6 3.90 -0.60 33.4 0.0 8.5 0.7
LH900x PIL8 0.309 78.5 -13 29.5 -1 3.65 -1.10 33.1 -0.6 8.3 0.0
F505 x PIL8 0.134 86.5 3 32.0 4 3.60 -1.20 32.7 -1.5 8.2 1.5
HS253 x GSH4 0.152 83.5 37 33.5 19 3.40 -0.40 33.0 -0.8 8.4 0.0
LH1556 x GSH4 0.520 103.0 76 34.5 21 3.31 -0.59 32.6 -1.6 8.9 1.3
RS 2013 x F846 0.272 100.5 11 47.0 10 3.10 -0.40 33.0 -0.8 8.4 0.8
Udangsuper x HS253 0.134 86.0 -32 33.0 -20 3.05 -0.30 32.5 -0.3 8.5 0.2
Predicting F
1
Performance from Their Parental Charectaristics in Upland Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) 59
Prediction of Mean Performance and Economic Heterosis
Genetic distance among parental lines estimated by using AFLP markers, means of the parents
(P1+P2/2), and the absolute difference between means of the parents (| P1 - P2 |) were used to predict
the mean performance and economic heterosis of F
1
hybrids. The significant positive correlations of
genetic distance with mean performance (0.472*) and economic heterosis (0.472*) was observed for
seed cotton yield only, indicating that genetic distance between parents is a good predictor of mean
performance and heterosis for this character (Table 2). The associations of genetic distance with mean
and economic heterosis for number of bolls (0.207), boll weight (0.351 & 0.464) and seed index (0.157 &
0.180) were positive but their magnitude was too low to be of any predictive value. In upland cotton,
Solomon et al., (1989) found that AFLP based genetic distance is not a good predictor of heterosis or F
1
performance for yield and most agronomic traits. However, they found positive correlations between
AFLP based genetic distance and F
1
performance for harvest index. Our results are in contrary to that of
Meredith and Brown (1998) who concluded that heterosis for seed cotton yield and boll weight in cotton
can not be predicted from the molecular genetic diversity of the parents. In a study on G. arboreum
(Asiatic cotton), Singla (2008) reported that the mean performance of F
2
populations could not be
predicted from the genetic distance among parental lines. Gutierrez et al .,(2002) found that the
performance of F
2
bulk populations in upland cotton is not always associated with the genetic distance of
the parents but on the genetic background of the parental germplasm. The significant and positive
correlations of means of the parents ( P ) with per se performance (0.529*) and economic heterosis
(0.529*) of F
1
hybrids for seed cotton yield and number of bolls/plant (0.497* each) suggested that
parental means had very high predictive power. For other traits, this association was very weak. The
absolute difference between the means of the parents (| P1 - P2 |) was found to be good predictor of
per se performance and economic heterosis of F
1
hybrids for seed cotton yield, ginning out turn and seed
index. It had significant and positive associations with seed cotton yield for per se performance (0.497*)
and heterosis (0.497*). There was positive and significant correlations with ginning out turn for per se
performance (0.558*) and economic heterosis (0.562*). However, the association for seed index was
negative for per se performance (-0.429*) and heterosis (-0.448*). Although, the correlations for number
of bolls/plant (0.10) was positive but of very low values and has no predictive power.
The result indicated that mean performance and economic heterosis of F
1
hybrids for seed cotton
yield can be predicted accurately from all the three properties of parental lines, viz. genetic distance,
parental means and absolute difference between the means of parents and are supported by theoretical
expectations of Melchinger (1987). Lamkey et al.,(1995) and Melchinger et al., (1998) have reported
that test cross means of F
2
or backcross populations or later selfing generations derived from them are
predictable from the genetic distance and testcross means of the parents in maize. The prediction of F
1
performance from the parental means has advantages- 1) the required information on the performance of
the parents can be obtained within one year across locations 2) the performance of n (n-1) F
1
hybrids can
be predicted from the mean performance of just n parents. However genetic distances estimated by
AFLP markers and the absolute difference between the mean of two parents could not predict the mean
of F
1
hybrids for other characters. The parental means ( P ) for boll weight, ginning out turn and seed
index and | P1 - P2 | for number of bolls per plant and boll weight could not predict F1 performance
and economic heterosis in the present study. The molecular markers based genetic distance provides data
covering the whole genome, whereas genetic variance is composed exclusively of quantitative trait loci
(QTL) effects which are segregating in the populations. Since the distribution of molecular markers and
QTLs responsible for genetic variance are unlinked to any marker and some of the markers are unlinked
to QTLs. Under such circumstances, there is a probability of reduction in the association between genetic
distance and heterosis (Bernardo 1992; Charcosset and Essioux 2004). Melchinger et al., (1998) has
given the theoretical explanations for the absence of correlation between F
1
heterosis and various
predictors. In the present study, we wanted to determine the associations between F
1
performance (F
1
)
and various predictors, (y). However, we actually estimated correlations between the estimates of both
variables (Melchinger et al., 1998). As a result, error in estimation of F
1
means or will reduce the
60 World Cotton Research Conference on Technologies for Prosperity
correlations r(F
1
,) relative to r(F
1
,y). This is supported by high standard derivations for F
1
means and
for most of characters (data not given). This indicated large replication variance for seed cotton
yield/plant, number of bolls/plant, plant height and seed index which could be reduced by increasing the
number of replications. The larger standard error is due to small sample size of F
1
hybrids and their
evaluation in one environment only. Decreasing the standard error of F
1
means and predictors would
require increasing the number of plants in each F
1
hybrid and their evaluation in several environments.
However, this would be extremely resource demanding. Sizeable errors were also associated in
estimation of genetic distance and other predictors.
TABLE 2: ESTIMATES OF CORRELATIONS OF GENETIC DISTANCE AMONG PARENTS (GD), MEANS OF THE PARENTS ( P ) AND ABSOLUTE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN MEANS OF THE PARENTS
(| P1 - P2 |) WITH PER SE PERFORMANCE AND ECONOMIC HETEROSIS FOR DIFFERENT CHARACTERS IN COTTON
Character Correlations with
Genetic Distance
(GD)
Mean of the
Parents( P )
Difference between two
Parents (| P1 - P2 |)
Seed cotton yield/
Plant
Per se performance 0.472* 0.529* 0.497*
Economic heterosis over
LH1556
0.472* 0.529* 0.497*
Number of bolls/
plant
Per se performance 0.207 0.497* 0.100
Economic heterosis over
LH1556
0.207 0.497* 0.101
Boll weight Per se performance 0.351 0.177 -0.048
Economic heterosis over
LH1556
0.464 0.176 -0.049
Ginning outturn Per se performance -0.336 -0.216 0.558*
Economic heterosis over
LH1556
-0.337 -0.210 0.562*
Seed index Per se performance 0.157 0.132 -0.429*
Economic heterosis over
LH1556
0.180 0.146 -0.448*
*Significant at 5% level of significance
CONCLUSION
We conclude from the present study that the per se performance and economic heterosis of F
1
hybrids for
seed cotton yield can be predicted from AFLP based genetic distance between parents, means of the
parents ( P ) and absolute difference between means of the parents (| P1 - P2 |) in upland cotton. The
means of the parents for number of bolls and seed cotton yield; and absolute difference between means of
the parents for seed cotton yield and ginning out turn and seed index are the good predictors of per se
performance and economic heterosis of F
1
hybrids in upland cotton.
REFERENCES
[1] Anonymous, (2010). Annual report of all India coordinated cotton improvement project for the year 2009-10 entomology
report. Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu-641 003.
[2] Bernardo, R., (1992). Relationship between single-cross performance and molecular marker heterozygosity. Theor. Appl.
Genet., 83, 628-34.
[3] Charcosset, A. and Essioux L., (2004). The effect of population structure on the relationship between heterosis and
heterozygosity at marker loci. Theor. Appl. Genet., 89, 336-343
[4] Cheres, M.T., Miller J.F., Crane J. M. and Knapp, S. J. (2000). Genetic distance as a predictor of heterosis and hybrid
performance within and between heterosis groups in sunflower. Theor. Appl. Genet., 100: 889-894.
[5] Gill, M.S., Gumber R.K., Gill J.S., Sohu R.S. and Rathore P., (2008). Varietal impovement program of cotton in Punjab.
Proceedings of the Annual Group Meeting of AICCIP, April 9-10, Ludhiana, pp: 13-24.
[6] Gutierrez, O.A., Basu, S., Saha S., Jenkins, J.N., Shoemaker, D. B., Cheatham, C. L. and McCarty, J.C. Jr., (2002). Genetic
distance among selected cotton genotypes and its relationship with F<sup>2</suup> performance. Crop Sci., 42: 1841-47.
[7] Katarki, B.H., (1972). Varalaxmi: A high yielding hybrid cotton of quality. Indian Farming, 21:35-36
[8] Lamkey, K.R., Schnicker B.J. and and Melchinger A.E., (1995). Epistasis in an elite maize hybrid and choice of generation
for inbred line development. Crop Sci. 35: 1272-1281.
Predicting F
1
Performance from Their Parental Charectaristics in Upland Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) 61
[9] Lanza, L. L. B., Souza, C. L. Jr. de, Ottoboni, L. M. M., Vieira, M. L. C. and Souza, A. P. de, (1997). Genetic distance of
inbred lines and prediction of maize single-cross performance using RAPD markers. Theor. Appl. Genet., 94: 1023-1030.
[10] LeeGodshalk , M., E.B., Lamkey, K. R. and Woodman, W. W., (1989). Association of restriction fragment length
polymorphism among maize inbreds with agronomic performance of their crosses. Crop Sci., 29: 1067-1071.
[11] Melchinger, A.E., (1987). Expectation of means and variances of testcrosses produced from F2 and backcross individuals
and their selfed progenies. Heredity, 59: 105-115.
[12] Melchinger, A. E., Gumber, R. K., Leipert, B., Voylsteke, M. and Kuiper, M., (1998). Prediction of testcross means and
variances among F3 progenies of F1 crosses from testcross means and genetic distances of their parents in maize. Theor.
Applied Genet., 96: 503-512.
[13] Meredith, W. R. Jr. and Brown, J. S., (1998). Heterosis and combining ability of cottons originating from different regions
of the United States. J. Cotton Sci., 2:77-84.
[14] Nassimi, A.W., Raziuddin Sardar, A. and Naushad, A., (2006). Study on heterosis in agronomic characters of rapeseed
(Brassica napus L.) using diallel. J. Agron., 5: 505-508.
[15] Nei, N. and Li, W. (1979). Mathematical model for studying genetic variation in terms of restriction endonucleases. Proc.
Natl. Acad. Sci., USA, 76: 5263-73.
[16] Panse, V.G. and Sukhatme, P. V., (1967). Statistical methods for agricultural workers. ICAR, New Delhi.
[17] Patel, C.T., (1971). Hybrid H4: A new hope towards self-sufficiency in cotton in India. Cotton Dev., 1:1-5
[18] Radoev, M., Becker, H .C. and Ecke, W., (2008). Genetic analysis of heterosis for yield and yield components in rapeseed
(Brassica napus L.) by quantitative trait locus mapping. Genet., 179: 1547-1558.
[19] Rameeh, V., (2011). Heterosis and combining ability assessment for phenological traits, plant height and grain yield in
Winter x Spring combinations of rapeseed varieties. Int. J. Plant Breed. Genet., 5: 349-57
[20] Selvaraj, Immanuel, Pothiraj Nagarajan, Kattiyanan Thiyagarajan, and Maruddapan Bharathi, (2010). Predicting the
relationship between molecular marker heterozygosity and hybrid performance using RAPD markers in rice (Oryza sativa
L.). African J. Biotech., 9: 7641-7653
[21] Schill, B., Melchinger, A. E., Gumber, R. K. and Link, W., (1998). Comparison of intra- and inter-pool crosses in faba
bean (Vicia faba L) II. Genetic effects estimated from generation means in Mediterranean and German environments. Plant
Breeding, 117: 351-359
[22] Singla, J., (2008). Prediction of F2 performance in Gossypium arboreum L. based on genetic diversity of parental lines at
molecular level. M.Sc Thesis, Punjab Agricultural University Ludhiana.
[23] Smith, O.S., Smith, J. SC., Bowen, S.L., Tenborg, R. A. and Wall, S.J., (1990). Similarities among a group of elite maize
inbreds as measured by pedigree, F1 grain yield, grain yield, heterosis and RFLPs. Theor. Appl. Genet., 80: 833-840.
[24] Solomon, K. F., Labuschagne, M. T. and Viljoen, C. D., (1989). Estimates of heterosis and association of genetic distance
with heterosis in durum wheat under different moisture regimes. J. Agric. Sci., 145:239-248.
[25] VosHogers, P. R., Bleeker, M., Lee, T. van der,. Hornes, M, Frijters, A., Pot, J., Peleman, J., Juiper, M. and Zabeau, M.,
(1995). AFLP: a new technique for DNA fingerprinting. Nucleic Acids Res., 23: 4407-4414.
m
o
l
C
O
2
m
-
2
s
-
1
)
20
25
30
35
E
l
e
c
t
r
o
n
t
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
r
a
t
e
(
m
o
l
e
-
1
m
-
2
s
-
1
)
200
220
240
260
280
(a)
(b)
(c)
78 World Cotton Research Conference on Technologies for Prosperity
TABLE 2: F TEST P VALUES FOR RELATIVE ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY (REC
25
, REC
45
), RELATIVE CELLULAR INJURY (RCI
45
), ABSORBANCE AT 530 NM (ABS
25
, ABS
40
)
AND RELATIVE ABSORBANCE AT 530 NM (RABS
40
) FOR COTTON CULTIVARS SICOT 53 AND SICALA 45 GROWN UNDER AMBIENT FIELD CONDITIONS OR UNDER TENTS,
POOLED FOR ALL MEASUREMENTS TAKEN IN SEASONS 1 AND 3 IN NARRABRI AND SEASON 2 IN TEXAS
Biochemical Measurement Cultivar Tent Cultivar. Tent
REC
25
n.s. n.s. n.s.
REC
45
n.s. 0.023 0.007
RCI
45
n.s. 0.005 0.077
Abs
25
n.s. n.s. n.s.
Abs
40
0.004 n.s. <0.001
RAbs
40
0.022 n.s. <0.001
Conversely, the genotypic response for enzyme viability changed under tents compared with ambient
field conditions. Although Abs
40
was lower for Sicot 53 compared with Sicala 45 under ambient field
conditions, Sicot 53 outperformed Sicala 45 under tents (Fig. 1e). This interaction was reflected for
calculation of RAbs
40
(Table 2). These results were similar to those reported by de Ronde et al. (1995)
who attributed higher absorbance for heat stressed cotton compared with the control to a higher affinity
for acclimation to high temperature stress in heat tolerant cotton cultivars. The reversal of genotypic
performance under ambient field conditions and under tents indicates that the enzyme viability test for
heat tolerance determination should be considered under in-situ high temperature stress, or hot growing
regions for which the heat tolerant cultivars are being specifically selected.
To determine whether genotypic differences for biochemical performance translated to higher order
physiology, gas exchange, fluorescence and water flux were evaluated under tents. Decreases in
photosynthesis and electron transport coupled with increases in stomatal conductance under tents indicate
that the temperature stress imposed by tents was sufficient to significantly alter physiological
performance (Fig. 2). Sicot 53 was found to outperform Sicala 45 for both biochemical assays (Table 2)
and these differences are reflected physiological performance under tents (Table ).
TABLE 3: F TEST P VALUES FOR PHOTOSYNTHESIS, ELECTRON TRANSPORT RATE AND STOMATAL CONDUCTANCE MAIN EFFECTS AND INTERACTIONS FOR COTTON CULTIVARS SICOT 53
AND SICALA 45 UNDER AMBIENT FIELD CONDITIONS (CONTROL) AND UNDER TENTS POOLED FOR ALL MEASUREMENTS TAKEN IN SEASONS 1 AND 3 IN NARRABRI AND SEASON 2 IN TEXAS.
Physiological Measurement Cultivar Tent Cultivar. Tent
Photosynthesis n.s. 0.006 0.046
Electron transport rate n.s. <.001 0.057
Stomatal conductance n.s. <.001 0.036
Decreases in net photosynthesis under elevated temperatures may be attributed to limited electron
flow through photosynthetic and respiratory pathways (Wise et al., 2004) as a result of compromised
membrane permeability (Gupta 2007) and a decline in the activity of rate-limiting enzymes, particularly
those associate with photosynthetic and respiratory channels (Bjorkman et al., 1980; Burke et al., 1988;
Salvucci and Crafts-Brandner 2004 b). Alternately, it may be proposed that genotype specific decreases
in membrane permeability and deactivation of respiratory enzymes found in this study are indicative of
an overall decrease in the functionality of a range of proteins and metabolic processes that are decreased
with elevated temperature under tents. However, photosynthetic rates still require delivery of carbon
dioxide to the photosystem and in this study, it is likely that stomata remained open to facilitate gas
exchange and maintain leaf temperature under elevated temperature in the tents, as water was non-
limiting (Lu et al., 1994).
CONCLUSION
In this study, genotypic differences determined for the membrane integrity and enzyme viability assays
were most reflective of field performance when evaluated under in-situ high temperature stress in the
field. Similar to previously determined heat tolerance in the field, Sicot 53 outperformed Sicala 45 under
tents for both membrane integrity and enzyme viability and differences found using biochemical screens
for heat tolerance helped to explain differences in photosynthesis, electron transport rate and stomatal
conductance under tents. Thus, the biochemical assays were successfully implemented to resolve
between a cultivar with relatively high heat tolerance and a cultivar with relatively lower heat tolerance
under elevated temperatures in the field. The findings of this study indicate that biochemical screens for
heat tolerance may be useful for initial screening of large populations but heat tolerance should be
confirmed under contrasting thermal environments considering higher order physiological performance
before selections are made for incorporation into breeding programmes.
Multi-Level Determination for Heat Tolerance of Cotton Cultivars 79
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Thanks to Darin Hodgson, Jo Price, Jane Caton, Merry Errington, Warren Conaty, Erica Cuell and Aman
Dayal in Narrabri and Texas A&M Aggies Josh Bynum, Ellen Batchelder, Joerdan Kennedy, Justin
Scheiner and Matt Nors for technical assistance, particularly constructing and dismantling the tents. This
work received partial financial support from the Cotton Catchment Communities Cooperative Research
Corporation, the Australian Cotton Research and Development Corporation, The University of Sydney,
Texas A&M University and CSIRO Plant Industry.
REFERENCES
[1] Ashraf , M., Saeed, M. M. and Qureshi, M. J. (1994). Tolerance to high temperature in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) at
initial growth stages. Environ. and Exp. Botany 34 (3), 275-283.
[2] Azhar, F. M., Ali, M. M., Akhtar, M. M., Khan, A. A. and Trethowan, R. (2009). Genetic variability of heat tolerance, and
its effect on yield and fibre quality traits in upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Plant Breed. 128, 356-362.
[3] Bjorkman, O., Badger, M. R., and Armond, P. A. (1980). Response and adaptation of photosynthesis to high temperatures.
In 'Adaptation of plants to water and high temperature stress.' (Eds NC Turner and PJ Jackson) pp. 233-249. (John Wiley &
Sons: New York)
[4] Burke, J. J., Mahan, J. R. and Hatfield, J. L. (1988). Crop-specific thermal kinetic windows in relation to wheat and cotton
biomass production. Agron. j. 80 (4), 553-556.
[5] Constable, G. A., Reid, P. E. and Thomson, N. J. (2001). Approaches utilized in breeding and development of cotton
cultivars in Australia. In 'Genetic Improvement of Cotton.' (Eds J J.N and S Saha) pp. 1-15. (Science Publishers, Inc:
Mississippi State)
[6] Cottee, N. S., Tan, D. K. Y., Bange, M. P., Cothren, J. T. and Campbell, L. C. C. (2010). Multi-level determination of heat
tolerance in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) under field conditions. Crop Sci. 50 (6).
[7] De Ronde, J. A. and van der Mescht, A (1997). 2,3,5-Triphenyltetrazolium chloride reduction as a measure of drought
tolerance and heat tolerance in cotton. South Afric. J. of Sci. 93, 431-433.
[8] De Ronde, J.A., van der Mescht A, and Cress WA (1995). The biochemical responses of six cotton cultivars to heat stress.
South Afric. J. of Sci. 91, 363-366.
[9] Gupta, U. S. (2007). Membrane system. In 'Physiology of Stressed Crops' (Science Publishers: Enfield, NH, USA) 58-88
[10] Hodges, H. F., Reddy, K. R., McKinion, J. M., and Reddy, V. R. (1993). Temperature effects on cotton. Mississippi
Agricultural & Forestry Experiment Station, Mississippi State.
[11] Ismail, A. M., and Hall, A. E. (1999). Reproductive-stage heat tolerance, leaf membrane thermostability and plant
morphology in cowpea. Crop Sci. 39, 1762-1968.
[12] Khan, A. I., Khan, I. A., and Sadaqat, H. A. (2008). Heat tolerance is variable in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) and can
be exploited for breeding better yielding cultivars under high temperature regimes. Pak. J. of Botany. 40, 2053-2058.
[13] Lopez, M., Gutierrez, M. V., El-Dahan, M. A. A., Leidi, E. O. and Gutierrez, J. C. (2003). Genotypic variation in response
to heat stress in Upland cotton. In 'Proceedings of the 3rd World Cotton Conference', 2003, Capetown, South Africa, pp.
104-108
[14] Lu, Z., Radin, J. W., Turcotte, E. L., Percy, R. and Zeiger, E. (1994). High yields in advanced lines of Pima cotton are
associated with higher stomatal conductance, reduced leaf area and lower leaf temperature. Physiol. Planta. 92, 266-272.
[15] Rahman, H., Malik, S.A. and Saleem, M. (2004). Heat tolerance of upland cotton during the fruiting stage evaluated using
cellular membrane thermostability. Field Crops Res. 85, 149-158.
[16] Reddy, V.R., Baker, D.N., and Hodges, H.F. (1991). Temperature effects on cotton canopy growth, photosynthesis and
respiration. Agron. J. 83, 699-704.
[17] Reid, P.E., Thomson, N.J., Lawrence, P.K., Luckett, D.J., McIntyre, G.T. and Williams, E.R. (1989). Regional evaluation
of cotton cultivars in eastern Australia, 1974-85. Austr. J. Expe. Agric. 29, 679-689.
[18] Saadalla, M.M., Quick, J.S., and Shanahan, J.F. (1990). Heat tolerance in winter wheat: II. Membrane thermostability and
field performance. Crop Sci. 30 (6), 1248-1251.
[19] Salvucci, M.E., Crafts-Brandner, S.J. (2004a). Mechanism for deactivation of Rubisco under moderate heat stress. Physio.
Planta. 122, 513-519.
[20] Salvucci, M.E. and Crafts-Brandner, S.J. (2004b). Relationship between the heat tolerance of photosynthesis and the
thermal stability of Rubisco activase in plants from contrasting thermal environments. Pl. Physio. 134, 1460-1470.
[21] Sullivan, C.Y. (1971). Mechanisms of heat and drought resistance in grain sorghum and methods of measurement. In
'Sorghum in the Seventies.' (Eds NGP Rao and LR House) pp. 247-284. (Oxford & IBH Publishing Co: New Delhi, India)
[22] Wise, R.R., Olson, A.J., Schrader, S.M., and Sharkey, T.D. (2004). Electron transport is the functional limitation of
photosynthesis in field-grown Pima cotton plants at high temperature. Pl. Cell and Environ. 27, 717-724.
s shape (Fig.1,2),
fiber colour, seed linter, and also molecular marker (SSR). Successful hybrids also exposed to salinity
and non-salinity condition for selecting the resistant genotypes to saline environments. Six diverse cotton
(Gossypium hirsutum L. and Gossypium barbadense L.) genotypes were crossed in a diallel fashion, and
their 15 F
1
progenies along with their parents were evaluated in sand cultures under normal and saline
environments in a block design with three replications at the greenhouse during 3 years ending to 2009.
Sterilized seeds were germinated in Petri dishes at 22 3C for 4 days. Eight uniform seedlings were
transplanted into plots that separated in two sand boxes filled with washed and sterilized river sand,
covered with polythene beads. After the establishment, five plants were maintained for evaluation.
Temperatures during the experiment were averaged 33.21/ 10.6C (day/night) and relative humidity was
31.43-75.04% and the photoperiod was 14 hrs. Plants were given deionized water up to 10 days after
transplanting and saline and non-saline (control) grown plants were irrigated thereafter every 2 days with
half-strength Hoagland
s nutrient solution (Hoagland and Arnon, 1950) with NaCl (EC = 22 dSm
-1
) and
without it (EC = 0.88 dSm
-1
) and pH = 7. Electrical conductivity of the saline treatment was increased to
the desired level by incremental addition of the salt over 10-day period to avoid osmotic shock to the
seedlings. Plants in both environments were irrigated until saturated, with the excess solution allowed to
drain under sandboxes. The plants in both environments were harvested 45 days after planting at 7-8 leaf
stages. The characteristics such as shoot dry weight (SDW) in gr/plot, root length (cm),plant height (cm),
shoot fresh weight in gr/plot, Na
+
, K
+
, and Ca
2+
contents (mg g
-1
), K
+
/Na
+
, Ca
2+
/Na
+
, shoot dry weight /
shoot fresh weight(SDW/SFW), root length/shoot height (RL/SH), Geometric Mean Productivity(GMP),
Stress Tolerance Index (STI) and Tolerance Index (TOL) for shoot dry weight were determined. The
harvested plants thoroughly washed with distilled water then dried in an oven for 72 h at 80 C to a
constant weight. Plant samples were ground by mill and dried in a furnace at 500 C for 2 hrs for ion
extraction. Plant samples were added to 5mL of 2M HCl for digestion, and the digested solutions were
filtered and diluted by distilled water. The final volume of each sample was 100mL. Sodium and K
+
levels of each sample were measured by flame photometry and Ca
2+
was measured by atomic absorption
spectrophotometry (Isaac and Kerber, 1971). The selection criteria indices, including Geometric Mean
Productivity as GMP = (Yp)(Ys) (Fischer and Murrer, 1978),Stress Tolerance Index as STI = (Yp)
(Ys)/Yp
2
(Rosielle and Hamblin,1981) and Tolerance Index as TOL = Yp Ys ( Fernandez, 1993 ) were
calculated for yield of shoot dry weight in non-saline(Yp) and saline(Ys) environments. Tolerance Index
(TOL) was also calculated for Ca
2+
, K
+
, Na
+
, Ca
2+
/Na
+
, and K
+
/Na. Data subjected to analysis of variance
and means were compared by using the Least Significant Differences (LSD). Variations in general
combining ability (GCA) of the parental lines and specific combining ability (SCA) of crosses for the
measured characteristics were partitioned from the total genetic variance using Griffings Method II,
Model I (Griffing, 1956) . The components of variance ratio as
2
A / (
2
A +
2
D) and high narrow-sense
heritability [
2
A/(
2
A+
2
D+
2
e)] and [
2
A/(
2
g+
2
e)] were computed as a (
2
A,
2
D,
2
e) Estimated from
diallel analysis) and ab(
2
g,
2
e Estimated from Randomized Complete Block Design) method for each
characteristic to determine the relative importance of additive and non-additive gene effects respectively
(Baker, 1978). The differences of variance ratios as [
2
g/(
2
g+
2
e)]
b
-
[2
2
gca+
2
sca /(
2
g+
2
e)]
ab
and
[2
2
gca+
2
sca/(2
2
gca+
2
sca+
2
e)]
a
were computed for each characteristic to determine the non-allelic
effects in their genetic control. High-parent hetrosis was calculated as mean deviation of a cross
performance from the mean of its superior parent (Mather and Jinks, 1982).
Genetic Parameters of Physiological Traits for Salinity Tolerance in Diverse Genotypes of Cotton 87
X1= Delinter X2 = Sindose-80 X3 = Bulgare-539 X4 = Termez-14 X5= B-557
X6 = Siokra Xij = X
X1= Delinter X2 = Sindose-80 X3 = Bulgare-539 X4 = Termez-14 X5= B-557
X6 = Siokra Xij = X
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
For ion composition, the parents and Siokra with 1.66 g/plot had superior mean for shoot dry weight,
Delinter with 10.90 cm had superior mean for root length, Termez-14 with 25.74 cm had superior mean
for plant height, Termez-14 with 10.81 g/plot had superior mean for shoot fresh weight, Sindose-80 with
15.68 mg g
-1
had superior mean for Na
+
, Bulgare-539 with 24.67 mg g
-1
had superior mean for K
+,
Delinter with 47.74 mg g
-1
had superior mean for Ca
2+.
TABLE 1: ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE FOR SHOOT DRY WEIGHT, ROOT LENGTH, PLANT HEIGHT,
SHOOT FRESH WEIGHT, SHOOT DRY WEIGHT NA
+
, K
+
, CA
2+
, IN A SALINE ENVIRONMENT (MEAN OF THE SQUARES)
S.O.V D.F
S
h
o
o
t
D
r
y
W
e
i
g
h
t
(
S
D
W
)
R
o
o
t
L
e
n
g
t
h
(
R
L
)
P
l
a
n
t
H
e
i
g
h
t
(
P
H
)
S
h
o
o
t
F
r
e
s
h
W
e
i
g
h
t
(
S
F
W
)
Na
+
K
+
Ca
2+
GMP
(SDW)
STI
(SDW)
TOL
(SDW)
Crosses 35 0.187** 11.32** 8.21** 6.11** 21.46** 39.58** 23.63 0.082** 0.33** 0.15**
GCA 5 0.28** 25.19** 15.99** 8.76** 47.77** 98.33** 62.18 0.132** 0.45** 0.46**
SCA 30 0.183** 5.99** 5.96** 5.45** 13.19** 21.15* 10.88 0.056** 0.26 0.24**
Error 70 0.044 1.015 0.966** 0.711 1.99 1.256 0 .98 0.011 0.055 0.014
2
A/(
2
A +
2
D) 0.41 0.66 0.49 0.36 0.65 0.69 0.69 0.45 0.28 0.70
Narrow-sense heritability
a
0.28 0.45 0.43 0.28 0.48 0.54 0.54 0.33 0.25 0.71
Broad-sense heritability
a
0.88 0.92 0.86 0.87 0.83 0.99 0.76 0.79 0.85 0.94
C.V (%) 11.25 10.15 9.55 10.62 8.66 5.69 5.62 8.41 17.10 25.05
Narrow-sense heritability
ab
0.25 0.36 0.36 0.28 0.34 0.36 0.39 0.24 0.19 0.51
Broad-sense heritability
ab
0.66 0.64 0.69 0.63 0.65 0.83 0.73 0.69 0.66 0.75
Broad-sense heritability
b
0.76 0.79 0.82 0.76 0.74 0.94 0.79 0.72 0.69 0.84
BSH
b
-BSH
ab
0.10 0.15 0.13 0.13 0.09 0.11 0.06 0.03 0.03 0.09
*, ** Significant at P= 0.05and P= 0.01 respectively; A and D as defined in the text refer to additive and dominance genetic effects
respectively. And also a, b and ab as defined in the text refer to estimation of parameters with diallel assumption,without diallel
assumption(RCBD method) and
2
A,
2
D with diallel assumption and
2
P without diallel assumption respectively.
Significant variations in general combining ability and specific combining ability estimates were
observed for shoot dry weight, root length, plant height, shoot fresh weight, Na
+
, K
+
, and Ca2
+
contents
and indices of Geometric Mean Productivity (GMP), Stress Tolerance Index (STI), Tolerance Index
(TOL) for shoot dry weight (Table 1) indicates the importance of both additive and non-additive genetic
effects for these characteristics. High ratios of
2
A/(
2
A+
2
D) and high narrow-sense heritability
estimates of root length, plant height, Na
+
,
K
+
, Ca
2
and Tolerance Index (TOL), indicated the more
involvement of genes additive effects in their genetic control. Therefore, the efficiency of selection based
on these characters is expected to be high but, shoot dry weight, shoot fresh weight and indices of
Geometric Mean Productivity (GMP), Stress Tolerance Index (STI) were controlled pre-dominantly by
non-additive genetic effects (Table 1). When gca effects are not pre-dominant in self-pollinated crops, the
major portion of the variability, is due to additive additive genetic effects or divergence among
progenies in the same parental array and therefore, should be delayed to later generation. The high
differences of variance ratios [
2
g / (
2
g+
2
e)]
b
- [2
2
gca+
2
sca /(
2
g+
2
e)]
ab
were observed for those all
characteristics that had high narrow-sense heritability, indicating correlation between narrow-sense
heritability and non-allelic effects in their genetic control. This is resulted from interaction of many locus
of gene additive action in the quantitative characteristics that produce non-allelic effects. Sairam and
Tyagi (2004) also reported that Salinity stress response is multigenic, as a number of processes involved
in the tolerance mechanism are affected, such as various compatible solutes/osmolytes, polyamines,
reactive oxygen species and antioxidant defense mechanism, ion transport and compartmentalization of
injurious ions. Various genes/cDNAs encoding proteins involved in the above mentioned processes have
been identified and isolated in plants.
88 World Cotton Research Conference on Technologies for Prosperity
REFERENCES
[1] Ashraf, M. (1994). Breeding for salinity tolerance in plants. Critical Revi.3: 1742.
[2] Ashraf, M. and Saghir, A. (2000). Genetic effects for yield components and fibre characteristics in upland cotton
(gossypium hirsutum L.) cultivated under salinized (NaCl) conditions. Agron. J. 20:917-926.
[3] Baker, R. J. (1978). Issues in diallel analysis. Crop Sci.18: 533-536
[4] Fernandez, G. C. J. (1993). Effective selection criteria for assessing plant stress tolerance. In Adaptation of food Crops to
Temperature and Water Stress. Kuo.C.G.,Ed., AVRDC: Shanhua, Taiwan. 257-270.
[5] Fischer, R. A. and Murrer, R. (1978). Drought resistance in spring wheat cultivars .I. Grain yield response
.Aust.J.Agric.Res.29:897-912.
[6] Griffing, B. (1956). Concept of General and Specific Combining Ability in Relation to Diallel System. .Aust.J.Bio.Sci.
9:463-493
[7] Hayman, B.I. (1954). The Theory and Analysis of Diallel Crosses. Genetics 39:789-809
[8] Hoagland, D. R. and Arnon, D. I. (1950). The water culture method for growing plants without soil. Cali. Agric. Exp. Stn.
Cric.307,32 pp.
[9] Isaac, R. A. and Kerber, J.D. (1971). Atomic absorption and flame photometry: techniques and uses in soil, plant and water
analysis. In Instrumental Methods for Analysis of Soil and Plant Tissue, Walsh,L.M.,Ed., Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Madison,
WI:17-37.
[10] Postel, S. (1989). Water for agriculture: Facing the limits. Worldwatch paper 93.Worldwatch Institute. Washington DC.
[11] Rosielle, A. A. and Hamblin, J. (1981).Theoretical aspects of selection for yield in stress and non-stress environments. Crop
Sci.21: 943-946.
[12] Saghir, A., Khan, N. O., Igbal, M. Z., Hussain, A. and Hassan, M . (2002). Salt tolerance of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)
Asian j. Pl. Sci. 1, 6:715-719.
[13] Sairam, R. K., Tyagi, A. (2004). Physiology and molecular biology of salinity stress tolerance in plants .Curr. Sci. 86,
3:407-421.
[14] Volkamar, K. M., Hu, Y. and Steppuhn, H. (1998). Physiological response of plants to salinity: a review. Can. J. Pl. Sci. 78:
19-27.
Marker-Assisted Selection
for Improving Drought Resistance in Cotton
Yehoshua Saranga
1
, Avishag Levi
1
and Andrew H. Paterson
2
1
The Robert H. Smith Faculty of Agriculture, Food and Environment,
The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, P.O. Box 12, Rehovot 76100, Israel
2
Plant Genome Mapping Laboratory, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA
AbstractMarker-assisted selection (MAS) is gaining an increasing recognition as an efficient approach for
improving simply inherited traits, however, there are hardly any examples of successful MAS for complex polygenic
traits, such as yield and drought resistance. Quantitative trait loci (QTLs) for yield and drought-adaptive
physiological traits (osmotic potential, carbon isotope ratio - an indicator of water use efficiency, and leaf chlorophyll
content), were exchanged via MAS between elite cultivars of the two cotton species, Gossypium barbadense and G.
hirsutum. The resulting near isogenic lines (NILs) were examined in three field trials to test the effect of the
introgressed QTL alleles on cotton productivity under drought conditions and physiological traits. A considerable
number of NILs exhibited the expected phenotypes in term of greater osmotic adjustment, higher carbon isotope ratio,
and higher chlorophyll content. Moreover, a few NILs exhibited modifications in non-targeted traits such as greater
photosynthetic capacity under severe drought, modified leaf morphology, and considerable changes in metabolic and
mineral profiles. Finally, NILs introgressed with QTL alleles associated with high yield rarely exhibited a yield
advantage over the recurrent parent, consistently with other introgression studies, suggesting that the well balanced
genetic and physiological systems of the recurrent parents may be interrupted by these introgressions. We conclude
that MAS is a useful approach to enhance drought-adaptive traits in cotton, but complimentary recombination and
selection are required to combine these traits with high yield potential.
INTRODUCTION
About one-third of the world's arable land suffers from chronically inadequate water availability for
agriculture, and in virtually all agricultural regions, crop yields are periodically reduced by drought
(Boyer, 1982). Developing drought resistant crop plants is vital to meeting increasing demand for
agricultural products during an environmental shift to greater aridity (Parry et al., 2005). The
development of drought-tolerant crops by traditional breeding has been hampered by the low heritability
of traits such as yield, particularly under drought, and by large genotype x environment interactions.
Modern genomic techniques have aided tremendously in identifying quantitative trait loci (QTLs) and
diagnostic DNA markers in a wide range of crops and paved the way towards more efficient breeding
approaches.
Cotton (Gossypium spp.) with two pre-dominant cultivated species, G. hirsutum L. and G.
barbadense L. (denoted hereafter as GH and GB respectively), is the worlds leading fibre crop and also
an important oilseed. Cotton is an herbaceous warm-season crop and a major consumer of water.
Whether irrigated or not, cotton is often exposed to drought, which adversely affects both yield and lint
quality. In this regard, concerted efforts are required to improve drought resistance of cotton. Both GH
and GB cottons are tetraploid comprised of A and D sub-genomes that diverged from a common
ancestor about 4-11 million years ago and rejoined in a common nucleus about 1-2 million years ago
(Wendel, 1989). Modern cotton cultivars are outcome of intensive selection to produce large amounts of
specific types of fibers. This selection has unintentionally narrowed the genetic variability for drought
resistance (Rosenow et al., 1983). The availability of two domesticated closely-related cotton species that
have evolved independently and retained different genes or alleles for various traits provide an
opportunity to restore some of the desirable alleles "left behind" during domestication, by introgression
between the two domesticated species.
A long term project aimed at improving cotton adaptation to water-limited condition are briefly
reviewed in this paper.
15
90 World Cotton Research Conference on Technologies for Prosperity
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Analysis of F
2
and F
3
generations of an inter-specific cotton population (GH var Siv'on x GB var F-177)
indicated a total of 79 QTLs for ten measures of plant productivity and physiological variables (Saranga
et al., 2001, 2004; Paterson et al., 2002). Productivity of cotton in well-watered versus water-limited
conditions was largely accounted for by different QTLs, indicating that adaptation to both conditions can
be combined in the same genotype (Saranga et al., 2001; Paterson et al., 2002). QTL likelihood intervals
for high seed cotton yield and low leaf osmotic potential corresponded in three of four possible genomic
regions (two involving QTLs specific to water-limited conditions), implicating osmotic potential as a
major component of improved cotton productivity under arid conditions (Saranga et al., 2004). These
results provided the first evidence that there appears to exist not only a phenotypic correlation but also a
partly common genetic basis of OA and productivity (Saranga et al., 2001). Two of these three loci
mapped to homeologous (corresponding) locations on the two sub-genomes of tetraploid cotton
(chromosomes 6 and 25), suggesting that a particularly important role of one or more ancestral genes in
that region may have been retained since the A-D genome divergence and polyploid formation. The
finding that the GH allele was favourable at some loci and the GB allele at other loci suggested that
recombination of favourable alleles may form novel inter-specific genotypes that are better adapted to
arid conditions than either of the parental species.
Selected genomic regions containing QTLs for yield and drought related physiological traits (osmotic
potential, carbon isotope ratio - an indicator of water use efficiency, and leaf chlorophyll content), were
exchanged via marker assisted selection (MAS) by backcrossing the source of the favourable allele to the
alternative parent (GH var Siv'on or GB var F-177). The resulting near isogenic lines (NILs) were
examined in three field trials to test the effect of the introgressed QTL alleles on cotton productivity
under drought conditions and the underlying physiological traits (Levi et al., 2009a). Many NILs
exhibited the expected phenotypes including lower osmotic potential or greater OA (5 out of 9), higher
carbon isotope ratio (4 of 6) or higher chlorophyll content (2 of 3). A few NILs exhibited modifications
in non-targeted traits such as leaf size, leaf pubescence, and stomatal density. Two NILs that were
subjected to gas-exchange study exhibited improved photosynthetic variables and one of them showed a
stable net rate of CO
2
assimilation across a wide range of leaf water potentials with a notable advantage
over its recurrent parent under severe drought (Levi et al., 2009b). Increased levels of several solutes
(alanine, aspartic acid, citric acid, malic acid, glycerol, myoinositol, threonic acid, potassium, magnesium
and calcium) were found under drought conditions in one or more NILs as compared with their recurrent
parents, which could contribute to their superior capacity to cope with drought (Levi et al., 2011).
Finally, NILs introgressed with QTL alleles associated with high yield in our mapping study rarely
exhibited a yield advantage over the recurrent parent.
CONCLUSION
Yield is known as a low-heritability complex trait, influenced by multiple gene networks and epistatic
interactions among genetic elements, as well as between genetic and environmental variables (Levi et al
2009a). Breeding for yield under stress conditions is even more complex due to the difficulty to define
and apply a precise set of environmental condition relevant to the range of naturally occurring stress
scenarios. This emphasizes the power of genetic mapping, allowing the dissection of complex traits and
distinguishing common heredity from casual associations (Paterson et al. 1988), which cannot be
achieved by conventional approaches. Targeting specific genomic regions and characterizing their effects
can enable the reconstruction of favourable loci into elite cultivars.
Marker-assisted selection (MAS) is gaining an increasing recognition as an efficient approach for
improving simply inherited traits; however, there are hardly any examples of successful MAS for
complex polygenic traits, such as yield and drought resistance. In the current study, cotton NILs
exhibited an improvement in drought related traits, compared with the recipient parent. From a
physiological point of view, such changes that can be considered as enhanced drought tolerance.
However, NILs containing putatively favourable alleles for yield did not exhibit a clear advantage. Elite
Marker-Assisted Selection for Improving Drought Resistance in Cotton 91
cotton cultivars, such as the recipient parents used in our study, are the outcome of intense selection over
many generations among huge number of individual genotypes. The well balanced genetic and
physiological systems of such elite cultivars may be interrupted by introgressions of large QTL regions
or undetected non-targeted introgression. This possibly is a major reason for the poor success of MAS for
improved yield in previous studies (Cattivelli et al. 2008) as well as in the current study. It is established
that maximal selection efficiency for quantitative traits may be obtained by a combination of molecular
and classical-phenotypic approaches. The successful introgression of QTLs for drought related traits in
this study may serve as a basis for future breeding, however, complimentary dissection of the
introgressed regions and conventional breeding are required to combine the advantageous effect of the
QTL(s) with high yield potential.
REFERENCES
[1] Boyer J.S. (1982). Plant productivity and environment. Science 218, 443-448.
[2] Cattivelli L., Rizza, F., Badeck, F. W., Mazzucotelli, E., Mastrangelo, A. M., Fracia, E., Mare, C., Tondelli, A., Stanca,
A.M. (2008) Drought tolerance improvement in crop plants: An integrated view from breeding to genomics. Field Crop Res
105: 1-14.
[3] Levi, A., Paterson, A. H., Barak, V., Yakir, D., Wang
,
B., Chee, P. W. and Saranga, Y.(2009a). Field Evaluation of Cotton
Near-Isogenic Lines Introgressed with QTLs for Productivity and Drought Related Traits. Molecular Breeding 23:179-195.
[4] Levi, A., Ovnat, L., Paterson, A. H., Saranga, Y. (2009b). Photosynthesis of cotton near-isogenic lines introgressed with
QTLs for productivity and drought related traits. Plant Science 177:88-96.
[5] Levi A., Paterson, A.H., Cakmak, I., and Saranga, Y. (2011). Metabolite and mineral analyses of cotton near-isogenic lines
introgressed with QTLs for productivity and drought related traits. Physiol, Plant. 141:265-275.
[6] Parry M.A.J., Flexas, J., Medrano, H. (2005). Prospects for crop production under drought: research priorities and future
directions. Ann. Appl. Biol., 147, 211-226.
[7] Paterson, A.H., Lander, E.S. Hewitt, J.D., Peterson, S., Lincoln, S.E. and Tanksley, S.D. (1988). Resolution of quantitative
traits into Mendelian factors by using a complete linkage map of restriction fragment length polymorphisms. Nature.335:
721-726.
[8] Paterson, A. H., Saranga, Y., Menz, M., Jiang, C., Wright, R. (2002). QTL Analysis of Genotype x Environment
Interactions Affecting Cotton Fiber Quality. Theor. Appl. Genet., 106:384-396.
[9] Rosenow, D.T., Quisenberry, J.E., Wendt, C.W., Clark, L.E. (1983). Drought tolerant sorghum and cotton germplasm.
Agricultural Water Management, 7:207-222.
[10] Saranga Y., Menz, M., Jiang, C., Wright, R., Yakir, D., Paterson, A.H. (2001). Genomic dissection of genotype x
environment interactions conferring adaptation of cotton to arid conditions. Genome Res., 11:1988-1995.
[11] Saranga Y., Jiang, C., Wright, R., Yakir, D., and Paterson, A.H. (2004). Genetic dissection of cotton physiological
responses to arid conditions and their inter-relationships with productivity. Plant Cell Environ., 27: 263-277.
[12] Wendel, J. (1989). New World tetraploid cottons contain Old World cytoplasm. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 86: 4132-4136.
G
2
6711.7 11098.7 11589 15319.7 4401.2 4324.6
P
2
27072.7 27339.3 23015.2 38293.7 9979.2 7648.4
h
2
0.25 0.41 0.50 0.40 0.44 0.57
GCV% 3.88 4.59 4.94 6.59 3.21 3.17
TABLE 7: MEANS FOR YIELD (G PLOT
-1
) OF F
4
GENOTYPES IN 2007
Cross
Source GR
1
x GR
2
GR
1
x GR
3
GR
1
x GR
4
GR
1
x IN
1
GR
1
x GR
5
GR
1
x IN
2
HE 1847c 1748c 2057b 1822abc 1777e 1747cd
HY 2094a 1730cd 1855d 1736c 1948c 1857b
LE 1701d 1696cd 1818d 1899a 1836de 1947a
LY 1828c 1581f 1631e 1911a 1987bc 1826bc
YHE 1804c 2006a 1929c 1779bc 2064ab 1946a
YLE 1847c 1681
de
1842d 1529e 1914cd 1740d
Check 1935b 1868b 2088b 1861ab 1830de 1842b
LSD 79 64 72 98 85 81
Progeny means followed by a different letter are significantly different at the P = 0.05.
TABLE 8: ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE FOR YIELD (G PLOT
-1
) IN 2007
Cross
GR
1
x GR
2
GR
1
x GR
3
GR
1
x GR
4
GR
1
x IN
1
GR
1
x GR
5
GR
1
x IN
2
S
Genotypes.
56491.8 69687.9 111498 75805.9 54687.6 35547.5
S
Error.
2914.2 1927.4 2442 4493.7 3419.3 3055.3
CV% 2.86 2.51 2.57 3.83 3.00 2.98
F
test
** ** ** ** ** **
**p = 0.01, * p = 0.05, + p = 0.10.
108 World Cotton Research Conference on Technologies for Prosperity
TABLE 9: ESTIMATIONS OF GENETIC PARAMETERS FOR YIELD (G PLOT
-1
) IN 2007
Cross
GR
1
x GR
2
GR
1
x GR
3
GR
1
x GR
4
GR
1
x IN
1
GR
1
x GR
5
GR
1
x IN
2
G
2
13394.4 16940.1 27264 17828 12817.1 8123
P
2
16308.6 18867.5 29706 22321.7 16236.4 11178.3
h
2
0.82 0.90 0.92 0.80 0.79 0.73
GCV% 6.13 7.43 8.57 7.62 5.82 4.86
Progeny means followed by a different letter are significantly different at the P = 0.05.
The genotypes which were selected as high-yielding (HY) in year 2005 were differentiated from the
low-yielding ones (LY) in year 2007 in four out of the six crosses. However, only in one of them (GR
1
x
GR
2
) was the equivalent differentiation noticed in year 2006. In the other two crosses (GR1 x GR5 and
GR
1
x IN
2
), with differentiation in year 2006, no difference was noticed for yield in year 2007. The
genotypes combining high yield and earliness (YHE) were differentiated from those combining high
yield and maturity (YLE) in five out of the six crosses (except for the GR
1
x GR
2
). Therefore, the
differentiation noticed in year 2006 in the GR
1
x GR
4
and GR
1
x GR
5
crosses was maintained for the next
generation in year 2007. It is noticeable that the early genotype (YHE) out-yielded the late one (YLE) in
all six crosses. As far as earliness alone is concerned, the early genotypes (HE) were differentiated from
the later ones (LE) in three out of the six crosses (GR
1
x GR
2
, GR
1
x GR
4
and GR
1
x IN
2
), with the
second maintaining the differentiation presented in year 2006. Furthermore, in the first two crosses the
early genotype (HE) out-yielded the later one (LE) while in the third cross, the opposite trend was
observed.
Earliness
The earliness behaviour of the F
3
genotypes and the check, variance analysis and the genetic parameters
were reported in Table 10,11 and 12 for year 2006 respectively. The genotypes differed in five out of the
six crosses on 99% significance level, and on the sixth cross on 90% significance level. The CV%
variance coefficient ranged on very good levels in all crosses from 1.17 to 2.06%, while the heredity
coefficient gave high values from 0.71 for the GR
1
x GR
4
to 0.91 for the GR
1
x IN
2
cross. Finally, the
variance genetic coefficient was on low levels, ranging from 3.21 to 4.86%.
TABLE 10: MEANS FOR EARLINESS (DBO) OF F
3
GENOTYPES IN 2006
Cross
Source GR
1
x GR
2
GR
1
x GR
3
GR
1
x GR
4
GR
1
x IN
1
GR
1
x GR
5
GR
1
x IN
2
HE 105c 104cd 98e 108cd 106de 117a
HY 117a 108b 104bc 109c 114b 111b
LE 120a 114a 109a 114b 118a 111b
LY 108bc 102d 102cd 105d 106de 107c
YHE 107c 106bc 99de 109c 104e 107c
YLE 117a 112a 107ab 118a 115b 106cd
Check 108bc 106bc 102cd 113b 111c 105d
LSD 3 3 3 3 3 2
Progeny means followed by a different letter are significantly different at the P = 0.05.
TABLE 11: ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE FOR EARLINESS (DBO) IN 2006
Cross
GR
1
x GR
2
GR
1
x GR
3
GR
1
x GR
4
GR
1
x IN
1
GR
1
x GR
5
GR
1
x IN
2
S
Genotypes.
121.42 53.76 47.82 60.69 99.75 66.40
S
Error.
5 4.66 4.47 5.07 3.60 1.64
CV% 2.01 2.02 2.06 2.04 1.71 1.17
F
test
+ ** ** ** ** **
**p = 0.01,* p = 0.05, + p = 0.10.
Divergent Selection for Yield and Earliness in Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L) 109
TABLE 12: ESTIMATIONS OF GENETIC PARAMETERS FOR EARLINESS (DBO) IN 2006
Cross
GR
1
x GR
2
GR
1
x GR
3
GR
1
x GR
4
GR
1
x IN
1
GR
1
x GR
5
GR
1
x IN
2
G
2
29.11 12.27 10.84 13.91 24.04 16.19
P
2
34.10 16.94 15.31 18.98 27.64 17.83
h
2
0.85 0.72 0.71 0.73 0.87 0.91
GCV% 4.86 3.28 3.21 3.38 4.43 3.66
TABLE 13: MEANS FOR EARLINESS (DBO) OF F
4
GENOTYPES IN 2007
Cross
Source GR
1
x GR
2
GR
1
x GR
3
GR
1
x GR
4
GR
1
x IN
1
GR
1
x GR
5
GR
1
x IN
2
HE 112bc 110def 106cd 112de 112de 110g
HY 122a 113cd 109bc 114cd 119ab 114cd
LE 122a 117a 113a 120ab 121a 114de
LY 113bc 107g 107bcd 110e 111de 112ef
YHE 113bc 112cde 105d 115cd 110e 112efg
YLE 120a 115ab 110b 121a 118bc 119b
Check 115b 114bc 113 116bc 116c 111fg
LSD 3 2 3 4 2 2
Progeny means followed by a different letter are significantly different at the P = 0.05.
TABLE 14: ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE FOR EARLINESS (DBO) IN 2007
Cross
GR
1
x GR
2
GR
1
x GR
3
GR
1
x GR
4
GR
1
x IN
1
GR
1
x GR
5
GR
1
x IN
2
S
Genotypes.
72.65 33.76 23.11 50.13 71.13 57.57
S
Error.
5.63 2.88 4.78 6.29 2.87 1.72
CV% 2.05 1.52 2.02 2.18 1.47 1.15
F
test
** ** ** ** ** **
**p = 0.01, * p = 0.05, + p = 0.10.
TABLE 15: ESTIMATIONS OF GENETIC PARAMETERS FOR EARLINESS (DBO) IN 2007
Cross
GR
1
x GR
2
GR
1
x GR
3
GR
1
x GR
4
GR
1
x IN
1
GR
1
x GR
5
GR
1
x IN
2
G
2
16.75 7.72 4.58 10.96 17.06 13.96
P
2
22.39 10.60 9.36 17.25 19.93 15.68
h
2
0.75 0.73 0.49 0.64 0.86 0.89
GCV% 3.53 2.48 1.98 2.88 3.58 3.27
The genotypes selected as early (HE) in year 2005 were differentiated from the later ones (LE) in all
six crosses in year 2006, with the early genotypes remaining early and the late ones remaining late. This
differentiation ranged from six days for the GR
1
x IN
2
to fifteen days for the GR
1
x GR
2
cross. The
genotypes combining high yield and earliness (YHE) were differentiated from those combining high
yield and maturity (YLE) in five out of the six crosses, with the first (YHE) being earlier than the second
ones (YLE) from six (GR
1
x GR
3
) to eleven (GR
1
x GR
5
) days. The high- (HY) and low- (LY) yielding
genotypes differed in earliness in five out of the six crosses, with the high-yielding ones being later, as
expected.
The same holds true for the behavior of the seven genotypes (F
4
) for earliness in year 2007 (Table
13). The genotypes differed in all six crosses on 99% significance level while the CV% variance
coefficient was on very good levels in all crosses, ranging from 1.15 to 2.18% (Table 14). The heredity
coefficient gave values from 0.49 for the GR
1
x GR
4
to 0.89 for the GR
1
x IN
2
cross and the variance
genetic coefficient ranged from 1.98 to 3.58% (Table 15).
Early genotypes (HE) were differentiated from later ones (LE) in all crosses in year 2007 as well,
with the HE remaining early and the LE late. This differentiation occurred from four for the GR
1
x IN
2
to
ten days for the GR
1
x GR
2
cross. Likewise, the genotypes combining high yield and earliness (YHE)
were differentiated from those combining high yield and maturity (YLE) in all six crosses, with the first
(YHE) being earlier than the latter (YLE) from three (GR
1
x GR
3
) to eight (GR
1
x GR
5
) days. High-(HY)
and low-yielding (LY) genotypes different in earliness in five out of the six crosses, with the high-
yielding ones being later in year 2007 as well.
110 World Cotton Research Conference on Technologies for Prosperity
To sum up, in divergent selection, regarding yield, differentiation between high (HY) and low (LY)
was noticed for three out of the six crosses in both years 2006 an 2007 (F
3
and F
4
genotypes,
respectively). However, only one of the three crosses maintained this differentiation for both years. The
genotypes combining yield and earliness (YHE and YLE) were differentiated in two crosses in year 2006
and in our in year 2007.
As for earliness, the differentiation between early and late genotypes was absolute for all six crosses
during both cultivation periods. In addition, differentiation was noticed between HY and LY genotypes in
the same five out of the six crosses in both years of analysis, with the first being later than the latter, as
expected. The behavior of the YHE and YLE genotypes was differentiated in five in year 2006 and in six
crosses in 2007, with the YHE genotypes being earlier than the YLE ones.
Selection for earliness and yield appears to be possible while selecting for yield and late maturity
seems to be impossible with this specific genetic material and under these specific circumstances.
REFERENCES
[1] Hakimi, Al., Monneveaux, A., P. and Nachit, M.M. (1998). Direct and indirect selection for drought tolerance in alien
tetraploid wheat x durum wheat crosses. Euphytica 100: 287-294(8).
[2] Chesang-Chumo, J. (1993). Direct and correlated responses to divergent selection for rind penetrometer resistance in
MoSCSSS maize synthetic (Zea mays L.). Ph.D. thesis. Univ. of Missouri, Columbia.
[3] Chimenti, A. C., Marcantonio, M. and Hall A.J. (2006). Divergent selection for osmotic adjustment results in improved
drought tolerance in maize (Zea mays L.) in both early growth and flowering phases. Field Crops Research 95:305-315.
[4] Chloupek, O. (1999). Effect of divergent selection for root size in field-grown alfalfa. Can. J. Plant Sci. 79:9395.
[5] Falconer, D.S. and Mackay, T. F. C. (1996). Introduction to quantitative genetics. 4th ed. Longman Group Limited, Harlow,
Essex, U.K.
[6] Hallauer, A. R., Ross, A. J. and Lee, M. (2010). Long-Term Divergent Selection for Ear Length in Maize, in Plant Breeding
Reviews: Long-term Selection: Crops, Animals, and Bacteria, Volume 24, Part 2 (ed J. Janick), John Wiley & Sons, Inc.,
Oxford, UK.
[7] Hucl, P. (1995). Divergent selection for sprouting resistance in spring wheat. Plant Breed. 114: 199204.
[8] Klos L. E. K., and Brummer, E. C. (2000). Response of Six Alfalfa Populations to Selection under Laboratory Conditions
for Germination and Seedling Vigor at Low Temperatures, Crop Sci. 40:959964.
[9] Lamb, J. F. S., Barnes D. K. and Henjum K. I. (1999). Gain from Two Cycles of Divergent Selection for Root Morphology
in Alfalfa. Crop Sci. 39: 10261035.
[10] Martin, A. S., Darrah L. L., and Hibbard B. E. (2004). Divergent selection for rind penetrometer resistance and its effects
on European corn borer damage and stalk traits in corn. Crop Sci. 44:711717.
[11] Masole, H. (1993). Evaluation of high and low divergent rind penetrometer resistance selection at three plant densities in
maize. M.Sc. thesis. Univ. of Missouri, Columbia.
[12] Pressoir, G., and Berthaud, J. (2004). Population structure and strong divergent selection shape phenotypic diversification in
maize landraces. Heredity. 92: 95101.
[13] Radin, J. W., Lu. Z. M., Percy, R. G., and Zeiger, E. (1994). Genetic variation for stomatal conductance in Pima cotton and
its relation to improvements of heat adaptation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91: 72177221.
[14] Ulloa M., Cantrell R. G., Richard P. G., Zeiger E. and Lu. Z. (2000). QTL Analysis of stomatal conductance and
relationship to lint yield in an interspecific cotton. J. Cotton Sci. 4:10-18.
[15] Uribelarrea, M., Moose, S. P. and Frederick, E. Below. (2007). Divergent selection for grain protein affects nitrogen use in
maize hybrids. Field Crops Research 100 (1): 82-90.
[16] Verhalen, L. M., Baker, J. L. and McNew, R. W. (1975). Gardners Grid System and Plant Selection Efficiency in
Cotton. Crop Sci.15: 588-591.
). The following PCR conditions of 98C for 30 seconds, followed by 35 cycles of 98C
for 10 seconds, 57.8C for 30 seconds, 72C for 2 min and 10 min of final extension at 72C were used.
The amplified products were electrophoresed on 1.5% w/v agarose gel and documented.
Cloning of Amplicons
The amplicons were cloned into pJET 1.2/blunt vector and transformed to host bacteria (DH5). The
transformed bacteria were screened in the selection media containing IPTG (isopropyl beta-D-
thiogalactopyranoside) with x-gal (5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-beta-D-galactopyranoside) as per the
supplier protocol. The positive bacterial colony was selected for sequence analysis. The white colony was
demonstrated as recombinant bacteria.
Amplification of Promoter
A detailed understanding of the key steps in the fiber development process provides opportunities to
improve fiber quality either by molecular breeding or by genetic engineering technology. The second
technology uses extremely important tools such as cloning the targeted nucleotide sequences, making
desirable gene cassette and transfer to the targeted cells etc. For expressing a new character (gene) in
cotton fibers there is great need of a module (promoter) in expression cassette (transgene construct)
which will specifically express the character in cotton fiber cells. Therefore simultaneously, the upstream
region of fiber gene was isolated and the sequence information confirmed that the fiber specific region
belonging to CesA4 gene family.
Genomic DNA Isolation
DNA isolation was carried out using 20DPA boll of G. hirsutum cultivars LRA -5166, following
Paterson et al (1993) method and purified as mentioned above.
Primer and PCR Amplification
The cellulose synthase gene was used to design primer sequence to amplify upstream region i.e.
regulatory sequence by inverse primers. The primers were designed using FastPCR s/w. The forward
sequence 5-GCTATGTGGTAGGGACAATCTGGTC-3 and reverse sequence 5-
CTCAATACCTTTGTGTCTTGTTGTG-3 was synthesized by MWG, Bangalore. The genomic DNA
was restricted with stringent reaction of Hind-III restriction digestion and allowed for circularization of
DNA using ligase reaction. The ligated reaction was used for amplification of upstream region. Gradient
PCR (Biometra) was performed with reaction mixture components (dNTPs, MgCl, Taq polymerase,
forward and reverse 2 primers, ddH
2
O) and genomic DNA. The amplified product was characterized and
132 World Cotton Research Conference on Technologies for Prosperity
the expected size amplicon was eluted and reamplified with primers. Then the amplicon was eluted from
the gel using Roche agarose gel extraction kit and further subjected to cloning and transformation using
kit. The transformed single colony was sub-cultured and pure recombinant bacteria were subjected to
sequence analysis. After sequencing the nucleotide were BLAST searched for sequence homology and
annotated sequence was submitted to GenBank.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Cotton fibers are a type of trichome and researchers have frequently looked for analogies with vegetative
trichomes, especially those in the model plant Arabidopsis. An alternative model cell type for
investigating the function of genes expressed in cotton fiber would be particularly useful given the
substantial time and resources required for stable cotton transformation. The term trichome denotes a
filamentous outgrowth such as a plant epidermal hair. Trichome now refers to outgrowths of the plant
epidermis exclusive of cells of sub-epidermal origin; mainly leaf and stem (shoot) trichomes, cotton seed
hairs (fiber), and root hairs. These morphologically diverse cells and multicellular structures have been
shaped by natural selection for a wide range of functions, including water absorption, thermoregulation,
UV protection, both repellent and attractant components of defence, and seed dispersal (Evert 2006). The
seed epidermal trichomes that presently dominate world cotton commerce were derived through
domestication of wild cotton species with ancestral fibers that probably evolved to aid seed dispersal
and/or germination (Wendel et al. 2009).
In the present investigation, the cellulose synthase genes and fiber specific promoter were cloned and
sequence information was established. Expressive gene specific primers were designed and amplified
directly from the total genomic DNA of Arabidopsis thaliana. The full length sequence of AthA and Rsw-
1 genes were isolated from Arabidopsis thaliana by using high fidelity Pfu polymerase. The amplified
product was characterized as 5.3kb and 6.kb for AthA and Rsw-1 respectively (Fig-1). The amplicons
were cloned into pJET 1.2/blunt vector and transformed to host bacteria (DH5) and positive colony was
selected after 24hrs of culture (Fig-2). The clones were confirmed by restriction analysis and PCR. The
positive clones were subjected to sequence analysis. Since the sequence was colossal nature, primer
walking method was used to obtain full length sequence information and then Aligned with help of
bioinformatics tool (BLAST-Align). The sequence information showed that the AthA has homology of
99% with CesA2 (AthA) gene and the sequence was submitted to GenBank (Acc. No. FJ687279). The
other cellulose biosynthetic gene such as radial swelling1 Rsw-1 gene specific primers amplified the full
length sequence and the homology analysis showed similarity with rsw1 gene and the sequence was
annotated and submitted to Gen Bank.
Fig. 1: PCR Amplified Amplicons Were Resolved in Agarose Gel Showing 6.0kb and 5.3kb Fragments. Lane 1:
1kb Ladder, 2: RSW-1 Amplicon and 3: AthA Amplicon
Cloning and Characterization of Cellulose Synthase Genes from Arabidopsis thaliana 133
Fig. 2: The Amplicons Were Cloned Into pJET 1.2/blunt Vector and Transformed to Host Bacteria (DH5). White Colonies are Transformed E.coli
Fig. 3: PCR Amplified Amplicons from LRA 5166 Cotton Cultivar was Resolved
in Agarose Gel Showing 1.8kb Fragments. Lane 1: Cesa Amplicon, 2: 1kb ladder
Concurrently, to express these cellulose biosynthetic genes in tissue specific, cotton fiber specific
promoter was isolated. Inverse primers were designed to amplify upstream region of G. hirsutum
cultivars. Well characterized single amplicon of PCR product was selected. The size was found ~1.8kb
amplicon (Fig-3). The amplicon was cloned and sequenced by primer walking and homology results
showed the similarity with CesA4 promoter region. The nucleotide sequence was annotated and
submitted to GenBank (Accession No. HM 142347).
Assessing the function of individual CESA genes will require the identification of the null-mutant
phenotypes and of the gene expression profiles for each gene (Delmer, 1999). Beeckman et al., 2002
reported four of 10 CESA genes, CESA1, CESA2, CESA3, and CESA9 are significantly expressed in the
Arabidopsis embryo. They further identified two new mutations in the RADIALLY SWOLLEN1
(RSW1/CESA1) gene of Arabidopsis that obstruct organized growth in both shoot and root and interfere
with cell division and cell expansion already in embryogenesis. In our study we identified similar full
length sequence of RSW1/CESA1 gene. In the embryo, CESA1, CESA2, CESA3, and CESA9 are
expressed in largely overlapping domains and may act cooperatively in higher order complexes. The
embryonic phenotype of the presumed rsw1 null mutant indicates that the RSW1 (CESA1) product has a
critical, nonredundant function, but is nevertheless not strictly required for primary cell wall formation as
reported by Beeckman et al., (2002).
In all species, cellulose synthase catalytic subunits, encoded by CesA genes, share a common
structure that includes several putative transmembrane helices, and a cytoplasmic loop containing four
conserved regions (U1 through U4) predicted to be involved in substrate binding and catalysis (Delmer
134 World Cotton Research Conference on Technologies for Prosperity
1999). CesACesA interactions (Taylor et al. 2000, 2003; Kurek et al. 2002; Gardiner et al. 2003) have
revealed that CesA proteins also play a role in maintaining the association of the particles that compose
terminal complexes (Doblin et al. 2002).Divergence in both terminal complex organization and CesA
gene sequence among groups of organisms in which both have been characterized also indicates that
terminal complex organization, and thus microfibril dimensions, are influenced by CesA structure.
However, the evolutionary relationships among these organisms, which include seed plants (Delmer
1999). Although seed plants are thought to have only rosette terminal complexes, those species that have
been examined have numerous CesA genes.
In A. thaliana, analysis of mutant phenotypes and gene expression have revealed that some of the 10
members of the CesA gene family serve distinct functions in primary and secondary cell wall
synthesis(Taylor et al. 1999; Fagard et al. 2000; Holland et al. 2000; Scheible et al. 2001). However,
some groups of AtCesAs appear to have identical expression patterns and genetic complementation and
co-precipitation experiments have indicated that up to three distinct CesA subunits are required for
assembly of a functional rosette (Taylor et al. 2000, 2003; Scheible et al. 2001; Burn et al.2002; Desprez
et al. 2002; Doblin et al. 2002;Gardiner et al. 2003). Expression analysis revealed similar patterns in
other seed plant species (Tanaka et al. 2003; Burton et al. 2004; Liang and Joshi 2004). Furthermore,
CesA are members of a larger gene superfamily that includes the CesA-like (Csl) genes, some of which
may function in the synthesis of non-cellulosic cell wall polymers (Richmond and Somerville
2001;Dhugga et al.,2004). Thus, the differences between CesAs specialized for primary and secondary
cell wall deposition could relate to the ways in which they interact with each other or the cellular
structures that control terminal complex localization or movement.
REFERENCES
[1] Betancur L., B. Singh, R. A. Rapp, J. F. Wendel, M. D. Marks, A. W. Roberts and C. H. Haigler. (2010). Phylogenetically
Distinct Cellulose Synthase Genes Support Secondary Wall Thickening in Arabidopsis Shoot Trichomes and Cotton Fiber.
Journal of Integrative Plant Biology 2010, 52 (2): 205220.
[2] Burn J.E., Hocart C.H., Birch R.J., Cork A.C. and Williamson R.E. 2002. Functional analysis of the cellulose synthase
genes CesA1, CesA2, and CesA3 in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 129:797807.
[3] Burton R.A., Shirley N.J., King B.J., Harvey A.J. and Fincher G.B. 2004. The CesA gene family of barley. Quantitative
analysis of transcripts reveals two groups of co-expressed genes. Plant Physiol. 134: 224236.
[4] Carpita NC, Gibeaut DM (1993) Structural models of primary cell walls in flowering plants: consistency of molecular
structure with the physical properties of the walls during growth. Plant J 3: 130.
[5] Carpita NC, Gibeaut DM (1993) Structural models of primary cell walls in flowering plants: consistency of molecular
structure with the physical properties of the walls during growth. Plant J 3: 130.
[6] Chen, Z.J. et al. (2007). Toward sequencing cotton (Gossypium) genomes. Plant Physiol. 145, 13031310.
[7] Dellaporta SL, Wood J, Hicks JB (1983). A plant DNA miniprepration: version II. Plant. Mol Biol. Rep. 1: 19-21.
[8] Delmer D.P. 1999. Cellulose biosynthesis: exciting times for a difficult field of study. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant
Mol.Biol. 50: 245276.
[9] Delmer DP (1999). Cellulose biosynthesis: exciting times for a difficult field of study. Annul Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol
Biol 50: 245276.
[10] Desprez T, Juraniec M, Crowell EF, Jouy H, Pochylova Z, Parcy F, H ofte H, Gonneau M, Vernhettes S (2007)
Organization of cellulose synthase complexes involved in primary cell wall synthesis in Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc. Natl.
Acad. Sci. USA 104, 1557215577.
[11] Desprez T., Vernhettes S., Fagard M., Refregier G., Desnos T.,Aletti E., Py N., Pelletier S. and Hofte H. 2002. Resistance
against herbicide isoxaben and cellulose deficiency caused by distinct mutations in same cellulose synthase isoform
CESA6.Plant Physiol. 128: 482490.
[12] Dhugga K.S., Barreiro R., Whitten B., Stecca K., Hazebroek J.,Randhawa G.S., Dolan M., Kinney A.J., Tomes D., Nichols
S. and Anderson P. 2004. Guar seed b-mannan synthase is a member of the cellulose synthase super gene family.
Science.303: 363366.
[13] Dillehay TD, Rossen J, Andres TC, Williams DE (2007). Preceramic adoption of peanut, squash, and cotton in northern
Peru. Science 316, 18901893.
[14] Djerbi S, Lindskog M, Arvestad L, Sterky F, Teeri TT (2005) The genome sequence of black cottonwood (Populus
trichocarpa) reveals 18 conserved cellulose synthase (CesA) genes. Planta 221, 739746.
[15] Doblin M.S., Kurek I., Jacob-Wilk D. and Delmer D.P. 2002.Cellulose biosynthesis in plants: from genes to rosettes. Plant
Cell Physiol. 43: 14071420.
[16] Doblin MS, Kurek I, Jacob-Wilk D, Delmer DP (2002) Cellulose biosynthesis in plants: from genes to rosettes. Plant Cell
Physiol. 43, 14071420.
Cloning and Characterization of Cellulose Synthase Genes from Arabidopsis thaliana 135
[17] Evert RF (2006) Esaus Plant Anatomy, 3rd Ed, Wiley Interscience, Hoboken, NJ. Beeckman T, De Rycke R, Viane R,
Inze D (2000) Histological study of seed coat development in Arabidopsis thaliana. J Plant Res 113: 139148.
[18] Fagard M., Desnos T., Desprez T., Goubet F., Refregier G., Mouille G., McCann M., Rayon C., Vernhettes S. And Hofte H.
2000. PROCUSTE1 encodes a cellulose synthase required for normal cell elongation specifically in roots and dark-grown
hypocotyls of Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 12: 24092423.
[19] Gardiner J.C., Taylor N.G. and Turner S.R. 2003. Control of cellulose synthase complex localization in developing
xylem.Plant Cell 15: 17401748.
[20] Haigler CH, Roberts AW (2009) Biogenesis of cellulose nanofibrils by a biological nanomachine, In: Lucian L, Rojas O,
eds. The Nanoscience and Technology of Renewable Biomaterials, Wiley- Blackwell Publishing, Oxford UK. 368 pp.
[21] Holland N., Holland D., Helentjaris T., Dhugga K.S., Xoconostle-Cazares B. and Delmer D.P. 2000. A comparative
analysis of the plant cellulose synthase (CesA) gene family.Plant Physiol. 123: 13131323.
[22] Kim HJ, Triplett BA (2007) Cellulose synthase catalytic subunit (CesA) genes associated with primary or secondary wall
biosynthesis in developing cotton fibers (Gossypium hirsutum). In: Proceedings of the World Cotton Research Conference-
4, International Cotton Advisory Committee, Washington DC, USA.
[23] KumarM, Thammannagowda S, Bulone V, Chiang V, Han KH, Joshi CP, Mansfield SD, Mellerowicz E, Sundberg B, Teeri
T, Ellis BE (2009) An update on the nomenclature for the cellulose synthase genes in Populus. Trends Plant Sci. 14, 248
254.
[24] Kurek I., Kawagoe Y., Jacob-Wilk D., Doblin M. and Delmer D.P. 2002. Dimerization of cotton fiber cellulose synthase
catalytic subunits occurs via oxidation of the zinc-binding domains. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99: 1110911114.
[25] Liang X. and Joshi C.P. 2004. Molecular cloning of ten distinct hypervariable regions from the cellulose synthase gene
superfamily in aspen trees. Tree Physiol. 24: 543550.
[26] McCann MC, Roberts K (1991) Architecture of the primary cell wall. In CW Lloyd, ed, The Cytoskeletal Basis of Plant
Growth and Form. Academic Press, London, pp 109129.
[27] McCann MC, Roberts K (1994) Changes in cell wall architecture during cell elongation. J Exp Bot 45: 16831691.
[28] Meredith, W.R. Quantitative genetics. in Cotton (eds. Kohel, R.J. & Lewis, C.F.) 131150 (American Society of
Agronomy, Madison, Wisconsin, USA, 1984).
[29] Paterson, H., Brubaker,C.L. and Wendel, J.F (1993) A rapid method for extraction of cotton (Gossypium spp.) genomic
DNA suitable for RFLP or PCR analysis. Plant Mol Biol Rep.,11,122-127.
[30] Persson S, Paredez A, Carroll A, Palsdottir H, Doblin M, Poindexter P, Khitrov N, Auer M, Somerville CR (2007) Genetic
evidence for three unique components in primary wall cell-wall cellulose synthase complexes in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl.
Acad. Sci. USA 104, 1556615571.
[31] Richmond T.A. and Somerville C.R. 2001. Integrative approaches to determining Csl function. Plant Mol. Biol. 47:131
143.
[32] Ryser U (1985) Cell wall biosynthesis in differentiating cotton fibres. Eur. J. Cell Biol. 39, 236256.
[33] Saxena IM, Brown RM Jr (2000) Cellulose synthases and related enzymes. Curr Opin Plant Biol 3: 523531.
[34] Scheible W.-R., Eshed R., Richmond T., Delmer D. and Somerville C. 2001. Modifications of cellulose synthase confer
resistance to isoxaben and thiazolidinone herbicides in Arabidopsis Ixr1 mutants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98:10079
10084.
[35] Somerville, C (2006) Cellulose synthesis in higher plants. Ann. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 22, 5378.
[36] Tanaka K., Murata K., Yamazaki M., Onosato K., Miyao A. and Hirochika H. 2003. Three distinct rice cellulose synthase
catalytic subunit genes required for cellulose synthesis in the secondary wall. Plant Physiol. 133: 7383.
[37] Taylor N.G., Howells R.M., Huttly A.K., Vickers K. and Turner S.R. 2003. Interactions among three distinct CesA proteins
essential for cellulose synthesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100: 14501455.
[38] Taylor N.G., Laurie S. and Turner S.R. 2000. Multiple cellulose synthase catalytic subunits are required for cellulose
synthesis in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 12: 25292539.
[39] Taylor N.G., Scheible W.-R., Cutler S., Somerville C.R. and Turner S.R. 1999. The irregular xylem3 locus of Arabidopsis
encodes a cellulose synthase required for secondary cell wall synthesis. Plant Cell 11: 769779.
[40] Wendel JF, Brubaker C, Alvarez I, Cronn R, McD Stewart J (2009) Evolution and natural history of the cotton genus. In:
Paterson AH, ed. Genetics and Genomics of Cotton, Plant Genetics and Genomics: Crops and Models 3, Springer Science
+Business Media, LLC, New York. pp. 322.
[41] Wyatt SE, Carpita NC (1993). The plant cytoskeleton: cell-wall continuum. Trends Cell Biol 3: 413417.
[42] Wyatt SE, Carpita NC (1993). The plant cytoskeleton: cell-wall continuum. Trends Cell Biol 3: 413417.
[43] Wymer C, Lloyd C (1996) Dynamic microtubules: implications for cell wall patterns. Trends Plant Sci 1: 222228
[44] Wymer C, Lloyd C (1996) Dynamic microtubules: implications for cell wall patterns. Trends Plant Sci 1: 222228.
from Gujarat in
2010. In the same year, field survival of Helicoverpa armigera and ~9% boll damage was recorded from Raichur belt of
Karnataka on both Bollgard
and Bollgard-II
Field Performance of F
1,
-F
2
and
non-Bt of BG-II
(MRC-7017 Bt) and JKCH-1947 Bt Against Bollworms
of Cotton
G.T. Gujar, G.K. Bunker, B.P. Singh and V. Kalia
Division of Entomology, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110012
E-mail:gtgujar@yahoo.com
AbstractStudies were undertaken to evaluate comparative performance of F1, F
2
and non-Bt versions of dual
stacked Cry1Ac and Cry2Ab transgenic cotton hybrid, MRC7017Bt and the single stacked Cry1Ac transgenic
JKCH1947Bt during kharif season. The results proved that lowest damage of terminal bud, fruiting bodies green boll,
open boll; incidence of Earias and Pectinophora gossypiella was recorded on MRC 7017Bt F1, JKCH 1947Bt F1 and
MRC7017Bt F
2
as against MRC7017 non-Bt, JKCH1947 non-Bt and JKCH1947Bt F
2
. The highest seed cotton yield
(27.00 q/ha) was recorded in MRC7017Bt F
1
followed by JKCH1947Bt (23.15 q/ha), MRC7017Bt F
2
(22.76 q/ha),
JKCH1947Bt F
2
(21.08 q/ha), JKCH non-Bt (16.08 q/ha) and MRC non-Bt 7017 (15.91 q/ha). The MRC7017Bt F
1
was found to be significantly superior among the entire hybrid tested, whereas, JKCH 1947Bt F
1
was statically at par
with MRC7017Bt F
2
regarding yield, both had significantly more yield than the non-Bt counterparts of JKCH1947Bt
and MRC7017Bt. These results are discussed vis--vis sustainability of Bt cotton in relation to the threat of resistance
evolution to its most important pest, H. armigera.
Keywords: Bt cotton, JKCH1947Bt, MRC7017Bt, bollworms,
INTRODUCTION
Bt cotton expressing Cry1Ac toxin derived from Bacillus thuringiensis was first commercialized in USA
in 1996 and later in many other countries. It proved quite successful in controlling lepidopteran pests
especially bollworms which are the main constraints in cotton productivity (Perlak et al., 2001). In India,
Bt cotton with cry1Ac gene was introduced in 2002 by Mahyco Monsanto Biotech Ltd., Jalna with 3-
cotton hybrids viz., MECH-12, MECH-162, MECH-184 grown over an area of about 38, 000 hectares.
Bt cotton area later increased rapidly to the present level of about 9.4 million ha in 2010. Concurrent with
area increase was the development of Bt cotton hybrids from 3 in 2002 to more than 780 in 2010. The
dual stacked Bt cotton expressing Cry1Ac and Cry2Ab were introduced in 2006 to control sporadic key
lepidopteran defoliator, Spodoptera litura which is tolerant to Cry1Ac and to contain the threat of
resistance evolution in the target bollworms. Presently more than 18 Bt cotton hybrids belonging to
Monsantos 15985 event of Bollgard II series are being grown; with area under dual stacked Bt cotton
being more than the single stacked Bt cotton with Cry1Ac. Cotton production has increased from about
14 million bales in 2002 to about 34 million bales in 2010. Despite increase in the cotton production,
cotton productivity of about 560 kg/ha is well below that of world average of about 690 kg/ha. Further,
there are quite a wide range of regional differences in cotton productivity from the lowest of 336 kg/ha in
Maharashtra to the highest of 774 kg/ha in Gujarat. The productivity differences are attributed to various
biotic and abiotic stresses. Further, one of the reasons of relatively low productivity is the use of
substandard seeds of Bt cotton hybrids and their F
2
and F
3
seeds by the farmers in view of seed cost
(Jayaraman, 2004; Herring, 2008). Besides, biotic stress due to sucking pests and the emergence of
tolerance/resistance in bollworms pose the threat to the sustainability of Bt cotton.
The bollworm complex is considered as the major constraint for the low level of productivity for
non-Bt cotton (Dhawan et al., 1988, 2004; Patil, 1998) and poses a threat to Bt cotton in view of wide
range of insect susceptibility as reported in the cotton bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera (Kranthi et al.,
2001; Gujar et al., 2000; 2008). In recent years, other bollworms like spotted and pink bollworms are
becoming important pests of non-Bt cotton and the latter is damaging the Bt cotton especially after 120
days wherein farmers are aiming for third picking of cotton by irrigating Bt cotton crop after the main
28
166 World Cotton Research Conference on Technologies for Prosperity
cotton season. The sucking insect pests are also important pests and are estimated to cause loss to the
extent of 46.5% (Panchabhavi et al., 1990). In Bt cotton, sucking pests like mealy bug, Phenacoccus
solenopsis is becoming a major pest. It has reportedly caused loss of about Rs 1590 millions in 2007-08,
the highest ever in the recent times (http://ncipm.org.in/Mealybugs/mealybug.htm). Thus, Bt cotton
despite its ability to control bollworm complex needs timely and limited application of insecticides as
some time pest complex is above the threshold levels (Bambawale et al., 2004). Thus, the changing pest
scenario and threat of Bt resistance looming large in view of wide range of Bt cotton hybrids, legal and
illegal, and also F
2
seeds are the main concern of sustainable Bt cotton cultivation (Monga 2008). Hence,
studies were undertaken to evaluate the comparative performance of Bt cotton, single stacked
JKCH1947Bt and dual stacked MRC7017 Bt, with their non-Bt and F
2
counterparts and under the
selection pressure of H. armigera under cage conditions.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Field experiment was laid out in randomized block design (RBD) with 6 treatments, and replications
during kharif, 2007 at transgenic field, IARI, New Delhi. The seeds of JKCH-1947 Bt-F
1
, Bt-F
2
and Non-
Bt were obtained from JK Agri-Genetics Ltd. Hyderabad. Whereas, MRC-7017 Bt-F
1
(BG-II), Bt-F
2
(BG-II) and Non-Bt were obtained from Mahyco Seeds Ltd. Jalna (Maharashtra).
Seeds were treated with imidacloprid 70 WS (Gaucho
)
@ 125 ml/ha were made at 25 DAS and 57 DAS, respectively.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The F
1,
F
2
and non-Bt cotton of Bollgard-II MRC-7017 and JKCH1947Bt were included in the field
experiment conducted during kharif, 2007, for studying the comparative performance of these hybrids
against the major boll worms of cotton. The results of the field investigation during 2007 on different
parameters have been presented given below (Table 1 4).
Field Performance of F
1,
-F
2
and
non-Bt of BG-II (MRC-7017 Bt) and JKCH-1947 Bt Against Bollworms of Cotton 167
TERMINAL BUD DAMAGE (%) AT DIFFERENT DAYS AFTER SOWING (DAS)
The data presented in Table 1, indicated the lowest terminal bud damage was recorded on MRC Bt-F
1
cotton (00.00%), followed by JKCH Bt-F
1
(0.60%), MRC Bt-F
2
(1.20%), and JKCH Bt-F
2
cotton
(1.88%) and these were found statistically at par to each other at 30 DAS. However, it was significantly
highest recorded on MRC non-Bt cotton (20.50%) and JKCH non-Bt cotton (13.95%). Further at 60
DAS, lowest terminal buds damage was recorded on MRC Bt-F
1
cotton (0.60%), followed by JK Bt-F
1
(1.20%), MRC Bt-F
2
(1.80%) and JK Bt-F
2
cotton (3.90%) and all these were significantly superior to JK
non-Bt (29.39%) and MRC non-Bt cotton (29.31%). The mean terminal bud damage was lowest on MRC
Bt-F
1
(0.3%), followed by JK Bt-F
1
(0.9%), MRC Bt-F
2
(1.5%) and JKCHBt-F
2
cotton (2.89%), and the
highest on MRC non-Bt (24.91%) and JK non-Bt cotton (21.67%).
FRUITING BODIES (SHEDDING) DAMAGE (%) AND EARIAS SP. INCIDENCE AT DIFFERENT DAS
At 65 DAS, MRC Bt-F
1
cotton was significantly superior in term of lowest shedding damage (2.50%) as
compared to all other hybrids tested. However, MRC Bt-F
2
(10%) and JKCH Bt-F
1
cotton (10%) were at
par to each other, but significantly superior over MRC non-Bt (42.50%) and JK non-Bt cotton (30%)
(Table 1). At 95 DAS, minimum shedding damage was recorded on MRC Bt-F
1
cotton (7.50%) followed
by JKCH Bt-F
1
(13.75%), MRC Bt-F
2
(20%) and JKCH Bt-F
2
(30%) and all these were found superior
over MRC non-Bt (47.50%) and JKCH non-Bt cotton (38.75%) except JKCH Bt-F
2
cotton.
The mean fruiting body damage was lowest on MRC Bt-F
1
cotton (5%) and found significantly
superior over all the hybrids used. However, JKCH Bt-F
1
(11.87%) and MRC Bt-F
2
cotton (15%) were
found at par to each other and significantly superior over MRC non-Bt (45%) and JKCH non-Bt cotton
(34.38%) (Table1).
TABLE 1: COMPARATIVE PERFORMANCE OF MRC 7017BT AND JKCH 1947BT AGAINST INFESTATION OF EARIAS SPP. AT DIFFERENT DAS DURING KHARIF, 2007
Hybrids
Terminal Bud Damage (%) at DAS* Fruiting Bodies Damage (%) at DAS* Earias sp. Larvae/20 Shedding**
30 60 Mean 65 95 Mean 65 95 Mean
JKCH 1947Bt
Non-Bt 13.95
(21.62)
29.39
(32.74)
21.67 30.00
(33.17)
38.75
(38.35)
34.38
(35.85)
1.25
(1.31)
1.50
(1.4)
1.38
(1.37)
Bt-F
2
1.88
(7.83)
3.90
(11.18)
2.89 23.75
(28.91)
30.00
(33.02)
26.87
(31.19)
0.50
(0.97)
0.50
(0.97)
0.50
(0.98)
Bt-F
1
0.60
(5.27)
1.20
(6.48)
0.9 10.0
(18.14)
13.75
(21.65)
11.87
(19.94)
0.00
(0.71)
0.00
(0.71)
0.00
(0.71)
MRC 7017Bt
Non-Bt 20.50
(26.84)
29.31
(32.73)
24.91 42.50
(40.66)
47.50
(43.57)
45.00
(42.12)
1.25
(1.31)
1.50
(1.40)
1.38
(1.36)
Bt-F
2
1.20
(6.48)
1.80
(7.70)
1.5 10.00
(18.14)
20.00
(26.48)
15.00
(22.64)
0.25
(0.84)
0.25
(0.84)
0.25
(0.85)
Bt-F
1
0.00
(4.06)
0.60
(5.27)
0.3 2.50
(8.49)
7.50
(15.68)
5.00
(12.71)
0.00
(0.71)
0.00
(0.71)
0.00
(0.71)
SEm 1.95 1.41 2.98 3.69 1.86 0.14 0.13 0.097
CD at 5% 4.16 3.01 6.36 7.87 3.96 0.29 0.287 0.21
*Figures in parentheses are transformed by arc-sin transformation,
**Figures in parentheses are transformed by x + 0.5 transformation
At 65 DAS, Earias sp. larval population was none on MRC Bt-F
1
and JKCH Bt-F
1
cotton; MRC Bt-
F
2
(0.25 l/plant) and JKCH Bt-F
2
cotton (0.50 l/plant), whereas on MRC non-Bt (1.25 l/plant) and JKCH
non-Bt cotton had significantly higher (1.25 l/plant) from all Bt cotton hybrids. Similar trend was also
recorded at 95 DAS. Mean incidence of Earias sp. larvae was recorded zero on MRC Bt-F
1
and JKCH
Bt-F
1
cotton, while 1.38 l/plant recorded on both MRC non-Bt and JKCH non-Bt cotton.
Bollgard (Cry1Ac) and Bollgard II (Cry1Ac+Cry2Ab) were used in 2009 and 2010, respectively
*Mean of Aurangabad and Vadodara across the season and Means followed by same letter do not significantly differ
Bollgard (Cry1Ac) and Bollgard II (Cry1Ac+Cry2Ab) were used in 2009 and 2010, respectively
*Mean of Aurangabad and Vadodara across the season and Means followed by same letter do not significantly differ
0.36 0.07 0.34 0.19 1.27 0.15 0.11 0.03 0.11 0.06
2 Non-WS103 17.95 3.26 16.99 1.04 14.27 1.00 16.37 2.05 9.24 1.11 4.63 0.39
3 WS106 1.73 0.41 0.35 0.08 0.23 0.23 1.15 0.16 0.11 0.02 0.10 0.10
4 Non-WS106 18.25 1.94 12.20 0.19 15.33 0.24 13.99 1.77 7.42 0.25 5.21 0.19
5 Bunny BGI/RCH-2 BGI 1.93 0.56 0.49 0.06 0.44 0.09 1.29 0.04 0.09 0.02 0.11 0.03
6 Bunny BGII/RCH BGII 1.27 0.44 0.41 0.00 0.31 0.01 0.91 0.18 0.07 0.03 0.08 0.02
7 Surabhi/Sahana/Narasimha 14.07 1.02 13.83 1.63 15.20 0.14 12.03 0.99 8.23 1.35 5.89 0.15
8 Bunny non-Bt/RCH-2 non-Bt 15.57 2.17 11.10 0.53 13.05 0.93 13.28 1.10 6.46 0.47 4.85 0.17
Mean standard error of mean
DISCUSSION
Dow AgroSciences India Pvt Ltd conducted Biosafety Research Level 1 (BRL-1) trials at two locations
during Kharif 2008 and 2009 in South Zone; at two locations during Kharif 2009 and 2010 in Central
Zone; and Biosafety Research Level 2 (BRL-2) trials at three locations during Kharif 2010 in South
Zone. Efficacy data recorded during these BRL-1 and BRL-2 trials on American bollworm (H. armigera)
population, tobacco caterpillar (S. litura) population and fruiting body damage clearly demonstrated that
the WideStrike trait offered high levels of protection to leaves, squares and bolls from American
bollworm and tobacco caterpillar in WS103 and WS106 hybrids expressing the insecticidal proteins
Cry1Ac and Cry1F. The population of H. armigera was prominent during all the years of BRL trials
while S. litura was observed in the BRL-2 trials conducted during 2010 in south zone. It was further
observed that the fruiting body damage on WideStrike hybrids was greatly reduced as compared to the
non-transgenic hybrids indicating superior efficacy of WideStrike in controlling the target pests. This is
the first published report on the field efficacy of WideStrike cotton hybrids from India.
The reduction in population of H. armigera and its damage in WideStrike hybrids may be contributed
by Cry1Ac protein because Cry1Ac has been reported to be the most effective toxin among different Cry
toxins tested against H. armigera (Chakrabarti et al., 1998; Akhurst et al., 2003; Avilla et al., 2005).
Other researchers have also reported the efficacy of Bt cotton hybrids expressing Cry1Ac protein in India
(Kranthi et al., 2005; Gujar et al., 2010). Literature also suggests that Spodoptera spp. is relatively
tolerant to most of the known Bt endotoxins including Cry1Ac (Regev et al., 1996; Singh et al., 2004).
192 World Cotton Research Conference on Technologies for Prosperity
However, WideStrike cotton which expresses a novel Cry1F protein in addition to Cry1Ac which
controls S. litura effectively and also has activity on Heliothine species. Similarly, Tindall et al.,
2009 reported that Cry1F protein in transgenic cotton and maize provided very effective control
of Spodoptera spp. Apart from the above field efficacy data, laboratory assays also confirmed
that WideStrike hybrids and the individual proteins in diet assays controlled H. armigera and S.
litura effectively (Moudgal, unpublished information).
Upon regulatory approval, introduction of WideStrike dual Bt cotton in India will diversify the
choice of insect protection traits available to Indian farmers and enable effective management of
bollworms and improved control of S. litura in cotton. The additional diversity in insect proteins can
contributed to a delay in resistance development and therefore help preserve the technology of Bt cotton.
Globally, this event has been approved in USA (2004) and recently in Brazil (2009) for cultivation and in
Australia, Canada, Japan, Korea and Mexico for feed/food import, after completing necessary safety
assessments.
REFERENCES
[1] Akhurst, R. T., James, W.J., Bird, L.J. and Beard, C. (2003) - Resistance to the Cry1Ac -endotoxin of Bacillus
thuringiensis in the cotton bollworm H. armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), J. Econ. Entomol. 96:12901299
[2] Avilla, C., Vargas-Osuna E., Gonzlez-Cabrera J., Ferr, J., and Gonzlez-Zamora, J. E. (2005) - Toxicity of several -
endotoxins of Bacillus thuringiensis against H. armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) from Spain. J. Invertebr. Pathol., 90: 51
54.
[3] Brookes, G. and Barfoot, P. (2010) - GM Crops: Global Socio-economic and Environmental Impacts 1996-2008. P.G.
Economics Ltd, Dorchester, UK. http://www.pgeconomics.co.uk/pdf/2010-global-gm-crop-impact-study-final-April-
2010.pdf.
[4] Chakrabarti, S. K., Mandaokar, A. D., Kumar, P. A. and Sharma, R. P. (1998) - Efficacy of lepidopteran specific delta-
endotoxin to Bacillus thuringiensis against H. armigera. J. Invertebr. Pathol., 72: 336-337.
[5] Gujar, G. T, Kalia, V., Bunker, G. K. and Dhurua, S. (2010) - Impact of different levels of non-Bt cotton refuges on pest
populations, bollworm damage, and Bt cotton production. J. Asia-Pac. Ent. 13: 249253.
[6] James, C. (2010) - Global Status of Commercialized Biotech/GM Crops: 2010. ISAAA Brief No. 42. ISAAA: Ithaca, NY.
[7] Kranthi, K.R. Naidu, S., Dhawad, C.S., Tatwawadi, A., Mate, K., Patil, E., Bharose, A. A., Behere, G. T., Wadaskar, R. M.
and Kranthi, S. (2005) - Temporal and intra-plant variability of Cry1Ac expression in Bt cotton and its influence on the
survival of the cotton bollworm, H. armigera (Hbner) (Noctuidae: Lepidoptera), Curr. Sci. 89: 291-298.
[8] Padaria, R. N. Singh, B., Sivaramane, N., Naik, Y. K., Modi, R. and Surya, S. (2009) - A Logit Analysis of Bt Cotton
Adoption and Assessment of Farmers Training Need. Ind, Res. J. Ext. Edu. 9 (2): 39-45
[9] Regev, A., Keller, M., Strizhov, N., Sneh, B., Prudovsky, E., Chet, I., Ginzberg, I., Koncz-Kalman, Z., Koncz, C., Schell, J.
and Zilberstein, A. (1996) - Synergistic activity of a Bacillus thuringiensis delta-endotoxin and a bacterial endochitinase
against Spodoptera littoralis larvae. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 62 (10): 35813586.
[10] Singh, P. K., Kumar, M., Chaturvedi, C. P., Yadav, D. and Tuli, R. (2004) - Development of a hybrid delta-endotoxin and
its expression in tobacco and cotton for control of a polyphagous pest S. litura. Transgenic Res., 13 (5): 397-410.
[11] Subramanian, A. amd Qaim, M. (2009) - Village-wide Effects of Agricultural Biotechnology: The Case of Bt Cotton in
India. World Development, 37 (1): 256-267.
[12] Tindall, K. V., Willrich Siebert, M., Leonard, B. R., All, J. and Haile, F. J. (2009) - Efficacy of Cry1Ac:Cry1F proteins in
cotton leaf tissue against fall armyworm, beet armyworm, and soybean looper (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). J. Econ. Entomol.,
102 (4):1497-1505.
As the pest remains inside the flower and multiplies quickly, it was difficult to manage this pest by
the farmers even with 3-4 sprays. The insecticides used viz Imidacloprid (Confidor 200 SL),
Oxydemeton methyl (Metasystox 25 EC), Monocrotophos (Monocil 40 SL), Acephate (Starthene 75 SP),
Neem oil etc could not render satisfactory results. When these insecticides are used along with DDVP
(Nuvan 78 EC) as tank mix (@ 0.25 ml/l) the spread of incidence was checked to certain extent. In all the
locations where the pest has caused wide spread damage the cultivar was MRC-7351 BG-II (Kanaka)
only.
History of the Pest/ Previous Reports
Dasineura gossypii was described by Professor T. B. Fletcher in 1940 in Pusa, Bihar based on collections
from cotton flower buds (Fletcher, 1916). From Tamil Nadu also (Coimbatore) it has been reported
earlier as a pest on cotton as referred to as floral bud maggot (Ayyar 1932). Thus it could find a place in
Cotton in India: A Monograph Vol. II: 1960 (Dastur et al., 1960). After the initial reports, no
single reference about its appearance as a major/ minor pest is available. This is the first report of
Dasineura gossypii as a major pest in India.
Nature of Damage
Maggots feed on anthers and stamenal column leading to degradation / decaying. Three to fifteen
maggots are observed in a flower bud. The infested flower buds fail to grow properly and they will not
open as the petals as well as tissue inside dries. Thus comprehensive symptoms give a picture of flower
drying through organ degradation and death. The pupation take place inside dried flowers itself.
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
1
Bt Cotton cultivars
S
q
u
a
r
e
d
a
m
g
e
(
%
)
Kanaka
Neeraj
MRC-7383
Surpass
Miracle
Mallika Bt
RCH-2 Bt
Bunny Bt
Tulsi-9 Bg-I
Jai Bt
MRC-6918
MRC-7918
Chiranjeevi Bg-I
Species Diversity, Pestiferous Nature, Bionomics and Management of Mirid Bugs and Flower Bud Maggots 209
In general square formed will not turn into a boll, due to death at flowering stage. Tissue drying
and/or death unevenly lead to twisted or contorted stamenal column/ anthers. Compared to normal boll
persistent stamina column is seen in affected ones but it needs confirmation. In some cases, where
fertilization is not affected, the boll formation is affected. The size remains smaller. Tissue degradation is
prominent on boll rind also. The bolls will not reach normal size and no proper filling with fibre is seen
(plate 5 & 6).
Bionomics of Dasineura gossypii and Oviposition Pattern
The females of Dasineura gossypii preferred to lay eggs in square tips where in 42-45 eggs were traced.
There are three instars in the life history and pupation takes 4 to 5 days on bracts extending total life
cycle upto 10 -13 days. Further studies are under progress.
Large scale cultivation of bollworm resistant Bt transgenic cottons suppressed the dreaded pests
successfully world wide. Significant reduction in usage of insecticide especially broad spectrum
organophosphates and pyrethroids gave scope for emergence of new pests especially the sap feeders.
Mirid bugs either prevailing hitherto or newer ones have assumed key status warranting couple of sprays
during reproductive phase. Increased incidence of mirids in cotton may give rise to host range expansion
as well as enhanced damage in alternate hosts of these pests. Key strategies and integrated approaches are
essential for sustainable use of Bt technology.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The funds received from Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR) New Delhi in addition to the
technical support accorded by Central Institute for Cotton Research (CICR) Nagpur through TMC MM-I
3.1 project Emerging and key pests: their characterization, taxonomy, genetic diversity and control is
gratefully acknowledged.
Dr. C.A. Viraktamath. UAS. Bengaluru and Dr R.M.Sharma. ZSI. Jabalpur are acknowledged for
taxonomic services.
REFERENCES
[1] Ayyar, J. V. R. (1932)- Insects affecting the cotton plant in India. Madras Agril Dept Bulletin 28: 1-28.
[2] Dastur, R. H., Asana, R. D., Sawhney, K., Sikka, S. M., Vasudeva, R. S., Quadiruddin, K. and Roa V. P., and Sethi, B. L.
(1960)- Indian Central Cotton Committee., Bombay
[3] Hormachan, P. A.,Wongpiyasatid and Piyapuntawanon (1998)- New record of Megacoelum biseratense (Heteroptera:
Hemiptera) in Thailand. Proc. KUDRI Res. Conf., 20-23.
[4] Khan, M. (2003)-Salt mixtures for mirid management. The Australian Cotton Grower 24: 10.
[5] Khan, M., Kelly, D., Hickman, M., Mensah, R., Brier, H., and Wilson, L. (2004)- Mirid ecology in Australian
cotton.www.csiro.org
[6] Nagrare, V. S., Kranthi, S., Biradar, V. K., Zade, N. N, Sangode, V., Kakde, G., Shukla, R.M., Shivare, D., Khadi, B. M.,
Kranthi, K. R. (2009)- Widespread infestation of the exotic mealybug species, Phenacoccus solenopsis (Tinsley)
(Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae), on cotton in India. Bull. Entomol. Res. 99: 537-41.
[7] Patil, B. V., Bheemanna, M., Patil, S. B., Udikeri, S. S., and Hosaman, I. (2006)- A record of mirid bug Creontiades
biseratense (Distant) on cotton from Karnataka., India. Insect Environ. 11: 176-77.
[8] Udikeri, S. S. (2006)- Evaluation of new generation Bt cotton genotypes, Sustainability of Cry protein expression,
computation of ETL, Effect on aphid predators and development of IPM module for Bt Cotton under rainfed conditions. Ph.
D. Thesis, Univ. Agric. Sci., Dharwad, Karnataka (India).
[9] Udikeri, S. S. (2008)- Mirid Menace: An emerging potential sucking pest problem in cotton. The ICAC recorder Vol-
XXVI No.4
[10] Udikeri, S. S., Kranthi, K. R., Patil, S. B., Modagi, S.A and Vandal, N.B. (2010)- Bionomics of mirid bug Creontiades
biseratense (Distant) and oviposition pattern in Bt cotton, Karnataka J. Agri. Sci. 23: 153-156.
[11] Udikeri, S.S., Kranthi, K.R., Patil, S.B. and Khadi, B.M. (2011)- Emerging pests of Bt cotton and dynamics of insect pests
in different events of Bt cotton. Paper presented in 5th Asian Cotton Research and Development Network Meeting, Lahore,
Pakistan 23-25th February 2011. (www.icac.org)
a.NymphalPopulation
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
SepIfort SepII fort Oct Ifort Oct IIfort NovIfort NovIIfort DecIfort DecIIfort
Standard weeks
N
y
m
p
h
2
0
p
l
a
n
t
s
CotonasSol e crop CottonSurroundedbytomato Cottonwi thCowpea
b.AdultPopulation
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
SepI fort SepII fort Oct Ifort Oct IIfort NovIfort NovIIfort DecIfort DecIIfort
Standard weeks
A
d
u
l
t
2
0
p
l
a
n
t
s
CotonasSol e crop CottonSurroundedbytomato Cottonwi thCowpea
c.Squaredamage
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
SepI fort SepII fort Oct Ifort Oct IIfort NovIfort NovIIfort DecIfort DecIIfort
Standardweeks
S
q
u
a
r
e
d
a
m
a
g
e
2
0
p
l
a
n
t
s
CotonasSol e crop CottonSurroundedbytomato Cottonwi thCowpea
d.Bolldamage
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
SepIIfort Oct Ifort Oct IIfort NovIfort NovIIfort DecIfort DecIIfort
Standardweeks
B
o
l
l
d
a
m
a
g
e
2
0
p
l
a
n
t
s
CotonasSol e crop CottonSurroundedbytomato Cottonwi thCowpea
e.Spiderpopulation
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
SepIfort SepIIfort OctIfort OctIIfort NovIfort NovIIfort DecIfort DecIIfort
Standardweek
P
o
p
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
/
2
0
p
l
a
n
t
s
CotonasSol ecrop CottonSurroundedbytomato Cottonwi thCowpea
Influence of Spatial Cropping Patterns of Cotton Cultivation on Population Dynamics of Mirid Bug 213
Fig. 2: Influence of Cropping Pattern of Cotton on Dynamics of Mirid Bug during 2009-10
a.NymphPopulation
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
Oct Ifort Oct IIfort NovIfort NovIIfort DecIfort DecIIfort DecIIfort
Standardweeks
P
o
p
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
/
2
0
P
l
a
n
t
s
CotonasSol ecrop Cottonsuroundedtomato Cottonwi thcowpea
Cotonadjacent toweedy road Cottonadjacenttofal l owl and
b.Adultpopulation
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Oct Ifort Oct IIfort NovIfort NovIIfort DecIfort DecIIfort DecIIfort
Standard weeks
P
o
p
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
/
2
0
P
l
a
n
t
s
CotonasSol ecrop Cottonsuroundedtomato Cottonwi thcowpea
Cotonadjacent toweedy road Cottonadjacent tofal l owl and
c.SquareDamage
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
Oct Ifort OctIIfort NovIfort NovIIfort DecIfort DecIIfort DecIIfort
Standardweeks
S
q
u
a
r
e
d
a
m
a
g
e
/
2
0
p
l
a
n
t
s
CotonasSol ecrop Cottonsuroundedtomato
Cottonwi thcowpea Cotonadjacenttoweedy road
Cottonadjacenttofal l owl and
d.Bolldamage
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
Oct Ifort Oct IIfort NovIfort NovIIfort DecIfort DecIIfort DecIIfort
Standardweeks
B
o
l
l
d
a
m
a
g
e
/
2
0
p
l
a
n
t
s
CotonasSol ecrop Cottonsuroundedtomato Cottonwi thcowpea
Cotonadjacenttoweedy road Cottonadjacenttofal l owl and
e.SpiderPopulation
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
OctIfort OctIIfort NovIfort NovIIfort DecIfort DecIIfort DecIIfort
Standardweeks
P
o
p
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
/
2
0
p
l
a
n
t
s
CotonasSol ecrop Cottonsuroundedtomato
Cottonwi thcowpea Cotonadjacenttoweedyroad
Cottonadjacenttofal l owl and
214 World Cotton Research Conference on Technologies for Prosperity
Significant difference in square damage was observed during II fortnight of September, November
and December. Square damage was recorded as minimum in the cotton + cowpea (8.40-12.76) and cotton
+ tomato (10.62-14.86) and maximum in cotton as sole crop (14.67-30.02). No significant difference was
recorded during September I fortnight, October I & II fortnight, November II fortnight on the square
damage (Table 1& Fig 1c.). Mean square damage was minimum in cotton with cowpea as intercrop
followed by cotton surrounded by tomato and maximum square damage was recorded in cotton as sole
crop.
Significant difference in the per cent of boll damage was observed within the cropping patterns
during II fortnights of September, October, November and December. Cotton + cowpea cropping system
recorded minimum per cent of boll damage (9.06 - 18.61) as compared to other cropping patterns. No
significant difference in the per cent of boll damage was recorded during October I fortnight and
December II fortnight within the cropping system (Table 1 & Fig 1d.). Seasonal mean damage within the
cropping pattern also indicated minimum per cent of boll damage in cotton with cowpea as intercrop. No
significant difference in the spider population within the cropping patterns, however numerically higher
number of spiders was recorded in cotton with cow pea (Table 1 & Fig. 1e.).
During 2009 - 10 the influence of single cropping system on the nymphal population was not
observed consistently. The population varied significantly within the 5 cropping patterns only during
October I & II fortnight, November II fortnight and December I fortnight. On October I fortnight cotton
adjacent to weed road influenced the population of nymphs of the pest by recording highest population of
3.65 / 20 squares. During October II fortnight cotton adjacent to fallow weeds and sole crop of cotton
cropping system influenced the nymphal population by recording 1.85 and 2.95 / 20 squares respectively.
On November II fortnight cotton with cow pea and cotton surrounded by tomato recorded highest
population of 0.95 and 1.40 nymphs / 20 squares respectively (Table 1 & Fig 2a.).
Seasonal mean population was highest in cotton adjacent to weedy road & cotton surrounded by
tomato and the significantly minimum population was recorded in cotton as sole crop, cotton adjacent to
fallow land and cotton + cowpea and were on par with each other.
Significantly higher and lower number of adults was recorded in cotton adjacent to weedy road and
cotton as sole crop, respectively. Populations on all other cropping patterns were on par with each other.
Adult population of mirid bug was highly influenced by the cropping systems. During I and II fortnight
October and November cotton adjacent to weedy road and cotton adjacent to fallow weeds recorded
significantly highest level of adult population (Table 1 and Fig 2b.).
Square damage was significantly different within the cropping pattern during October I fortnight to
December II fortnight. Cotton surrounded by weedy road and cotton surrounded by tomato recorded
higher percentage of square damage during I and II fortnights of October, November and December
(Table 1 and Fig 2c). Significant difference in the per cent of boll damage was recorded during II
fortnight of November and December. Among the cropping pattern cotton surrounded by tomato and
cotton surrounded by weedy road recorded higher per cent of infestation consistently for two weeks
(Table 1 and Fig 2 d).
Overall spider numbers were minimum however, within the available population among the cropping
pattern, cotton adjacent to weedy road recorded higher mean population of spiders (Table 1 and Fig 2 e).
In general mirid population level was minimum during the observation period. Population of
nymphs, adults, square and boll damage observed during 2008-09 was higher than 2009-10. However,
with a mean population ranging from 2.32-2.77 / 20 plants 0.86-1.29 / 20 plants during 2008-09 and
2009-10 respectively caused % of square and boll damage ranging from 9.95 - 18.19, 6.91 - 12.51 and
20.60 - 28.97 and 13.95 -19.05 during 2008-09 and 2009-10 respectively (Table 1). Square and boll
damage were correspondingly higher during the availability of peak nymph and adult population.
Planting crops that are more attractive to mirids close to cotton crops may reduce population in
cotton. Lucerne has been shown to be an excellent trap crop for mirids, (www.cotton.crc.org.au). In the
Influence of Spatial Cropping Patterns of Cotton Cultivation on Population Dynamics of Mirid Bug 215
present study influence of cropping patterns were studied for the level of mirid nymphs and adult
population level. Results indicated that cowpea intercropped in cotton recorded minimum population of
mirid nymphs, adults than in other cropping pattern. This is in agreement with Altieri, 1987 and
Venugopal Rao (1995) who has reported that polyculture, intercropping provides a favourable habitat for
the buildup of natural enemies which makes less convenient to establish crop pests. According to the
present study cotton intercropped with pulses (Cowpea) registered minimum damage in squares and bolls
as compared to other cropping patterns. As per the present study, cotton surrounded by tomato and cotton
surrounded by weedy road recorded higher level of infestation. Mensah and Khan, (1997) reported the
movement of Creontiades dilutus adults into adjacent weeds. The present study indicated that cotton +
cowpea (as intercrop) and weed free surroundings will reduce the mirid bug population, and form an
important component of IPM package for the management of sucking pests including the mirid bugs.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
We acknowledge the financial assistance by World Bank through Indian Council of Agricultural
Research, New Delhi to carry out the present study as a part of National Agricultural Innovation Project
(NAIP/DSS/C 2046) at Central Institute for Cotton Research, Regional Station, Coimbatore.
REFERENCES
[1] Altieri, M.A. 1987. The Scientific basis of alternative agriculture. Agro. Ecology, Boulder / London: Crestview/ITP. pp.
[2] Barwale, R.B., V.R., Gadwal, U. Zehr, and B. Zehr, 2004. Prospects for Btcotton technology in India.
Ag Bioforum 7: 23 26.
[3] Bennet, R.M., Y., Ismael, U. Kambhampatti, and S. Morse. 2004. Economic impact of genetically modified cotton in India.
AgbioForum 7: 96 100.
[4] http:// www.cotton.crc.org.au
[5] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/miridae
[6] Khan, M., D. Kelly, M. Hickman, R. Mensah, H. Brier and L. Wilson. 2004. Mirid ecology in Australia. CRS Research
Rev. 15.
[7] Kranthi, K.R. and D.A. Russell. 2009. Changing trends in cotton pest management. R. Peshin, A. k. Dhawan (eds.),
Integrated Pest Management: Innovation Development Process. Pp. 499 541.
[8] Lu Y.H. and K.M. Wu, Biology and control of cotton mirids, (Golden shield Press, Beijing, 2008).
[9] Mensah, R.K. and M. Khan. 1997. Use of Medicago sativa (L.) interplantings / trap crops in the management of the green
mirid Creontiades dilutus (Stal) in commercial cotton in Australia. Int. Journ of pests Mgt. 43 (3): 197 202.
[10] Morse, S., R.M. Bennett, and Y. Ismael, 2005. Genetically modified insect resistance in cotton: Some economic impacts in
India. Crop Protection 24(5): 433 440.
[11] Patil, B.V., M., Bheemanna, S.B. Patil, S.S. Udikeri, and A. Hosamani, 2006. Record of mirid bug, Creontiades biseratense
(Distant) on cotton from Karnataka, India, Insect Environ. 11: 176 177.
[12] Ravi, P.R., 2007. Bio-ecology, loss estimation and management of Mirid bug Creontiades biseratense (Distant)
(Hemiptera: Miridae) on Bt cotton. M.Sc., (Agri) Thesis, Univ. Agric. Sci., Dharwad (India).
[13] Surulivelu, T. and B. Dhara Jothi. 2007. Mirid bug, Creontiades biseratense (Distant) damage on cotton in Coimbatore,
http://www.cicr.gov.in.
[14] Ting, Y.Q., Acta Phytophyl. Sin. 2, 285 (1963)
[15] Ting, Y.Q., Acta Entomol. Sin. 13, 298 (1964)
[16] Udikeri, S.S., S.B. Patil, H.M. Shaila, G.S. Guruprasad, S.S. Patil, K.R. Kranthi, and B.M. Khadi. 2009. Mirid menace a
potential emerging sucking pest problem in cotton.
[17] http://www.icac.org.
[18] Venugopal Rao, N. 1995. Bio-ecology and management of H. armigera in the cotton ecosystem of Andhra Pradesh.
Bulletin of APAU, R. Nagar, Hyderabad.
[19] Qaim, M. and D. Zibberman, 2003. Yield effects of genetically modified crops in developing countries. Science 299: 900
902.
Fig. 3: Weekly Average Lygus Abundance in Cotton and Alfalfa and Net Lygus Intercrop Movement Between Alfalfa and Adjacent Cotton, Lubbock, Texas,
2008 (left) and 2009 (right). Note: 1 ha = 833.3 KIS Samples, the Negative Value Suggest the Opposite Direction of Lygus Movement (i.e., from Alfalfa
Into Cotton). The Similar Alphabet on the Top or Bottom of the bar Among the Sampling Weeks Within a Specific Host and Year are Not Significantly
Different at Alpha=0.1 When Means Were Separated by LSMEAN.
226 World Cotton Research Conference on Technologies for Prosperity
A study investigating physical tracking of Lygus hesperus intermigration dynamics between or
among major habitats was conducted to validate this model and further characterize Lygus hesperus
metapopulation dynamics.
Intercrop Movement Dynamics of Lygus hesperus
Influx into Cotton
Analysis of variance of Lygus hesperus influx into cotton (year and host combined) revealed significant
differences in the pattern of Lygus hesperus influx into cotton among the sampling weeks (df = 6, 24; F =
5.2; P = <0.0015). There were significant interactions between Lygus hesperus intercrop movement with
week and year (df = 6, 24; F = 3.74; P = <0.0091). Lygus hesperus influx to a cotton field from nearby
alfalfa was very low when cotton was in its vegetative growth stage (0-40 DAP, days after planting, prior
to July). During the first five weeks following cotton planting, Lygus hesperus was not detected in cotton.
Once cotton began squaring (40-45 DAP), Lygus hesperus began moving into cotton from alfalfa
therefore obviously alfalfa was a source of Lygus hesperus to nearby cotton during the cotton squaring
stage.
In 2008, Lygus hesperus influx into cotton was highest at 83 DAP (fifth sampling week), followed by
97, 62, 76, 47, 69, and 104 DAP. In 2009, Lygus hesperus influx into cotton was highest at 56, 82, and 90
DAP (fifth sampling week), followed by 107, 65, 42, and 56 DAP. Peak Lygus hesperus influx into
cotton in both years occurred during the second week of August (during the fifth sampling week), when
cotton was in full bloom. Lygus hesperus influx was low in all weeks prior to this peak (during squaring).
The first peak of Lygus hesperus influx in cotton in 2009 occurred at 56 DAP or during the third
sampling week. It is unanticipated to have detected peak influx during squaring, as this is not considered
to be the most favorable cotton stage with respect to Lygus hesperus. High influx during squaring in 2009
might be accounted for by temporarily reduced alfalfa quality due to poor irrigation timing as a result of
an irrigation system backlog on the research farm and concurrently high temperatures and low relative
humidity.
Influx into Alfalfa
In order to understand the effect of cotton Lygus hesperus influx on a Lygus hesperus population in
cotton, and to understand the potential for cotton injury due to Lygus hesperus, Lygus hesperus retention
in cotton, rather than influx, is more important. For the purposes of this study, Lygus hesperus retention
can be calculated by subtracting outflow from inflow. Inflow can be estimated via sampling, but
estimating outflow is difficult. Assuming the cotton-alfalfa system as closed, Lygus hesperus outflow
from cotton can be estimated by sampling alfalfa and determining the quantity of influx into adjacent
alfalfa. In this study, Lygus hesperus influx in cotton and alfalfa was quantified for each sampling week.
Analysis of variance of Lygus hesperus influx in alfalfa (both years and both hosts combined) revealed
significant differences in the patterns of Lygus hesperus intercrop movement among the sampling weeks
(df = 6, 24; F = 10.65; P = <0.0001). Week and year interacted significantly (df = 6, 24; F = 10.78; P =
<0.0001) in terms of Lygus hesperus intercrop movement. In 2008, Lygus hesperus influx into alfalfa
from nearby cotton was near-zero when cotton was in its vegetative growth stage (0-40 DAP, prior to
July). Lygus hesperus was not detected in cotton during the first five weeks following cotton planting.
Once cotton began squaring (40-45 DAP), Lygus hesperus began moving between alfalfa and cotton.
Net Movement
Net Lygus hesperus intercrop movement between cotton and alfalfa was calculated by subtracting cotton
Total Lygus hesperus Influx (EW-marked Lygus hesperus captured in cotton) from cotton Total Lygus
hesperus Out flux (NFDM-marked Lygus hesperus captured in alfalfa). Positive net movement values
indicate net Lygus hesperus gains in cotton. Likewise, negative net movement values indicate net Lygus
hesperus losses. Lygus hesperus net movement data have the potential to indicate the timing of host
source-sink dynamics information which may be of value in making pest management decisions.
Development of Metapopulation Approach for Landscape-level Lygus hesperus Management in Texas 227
Lygus hesperus net movement into cotton varied significantly (df = 1, 2; F = 230.41; P = 0.0043)
between 2008 and 2009. Year and phenological stage affected Lygus hesperus net movement
significantly (df = 2, 32; F = 9.57; P = 0.0006). In both 2008 and 2009, Lygus hesperus net movement
was negative during cotton squaring, indicating net outflow from cotton. Net outflow peaked during the
second week of July, at 49-62 DAP in 2008 and 2009 (Fig. 3). During this period, few Lygus hesperus
(<1 Lygus hesperus /12 m
2
) were retained in cotton, and most Lygus hesperus visiting cotton moved back
to alfalfa. In 2008, as cotton grew older, and cotton squares continued to grow and blooming began,
Lygus hesperus net movement, with respect to cotton, gradually increased from negative toward zero, and
became positive as cotton approached full bloom (76 DAP). Thereafter, Lygus hesperus net movement
remained positive in cotton, indicating an increased cotton capability to retain more Lygus hesperus
having moved from alfalfa. In 2008, average Lygus hesperus net movement into cotton was significantly
higher (df = 2, 16; F = 3.64; P = 0.05) during cotton blooming (821.9 Lygus hesperus per ha or 0.99
Lygus hesperus/12 m
2
influx) and boll maturation (358.2 Lygus hesperus per ha or 0.43 Lygus
hesperus/12 m
2
influx) than during squaring (1,458 Lygus hesperus per ha or 1.75 Lygus hesperus/12 m
2
out flux). The Lygus hesperus net movement pattern in 2009 differed from that in 2008.
In 2009, Lygus hesperus net movement in cotton never became positive during the cotton growing
season. This indicates that alfalfa remained more attractive than cotton throughout the cotton growing
season. Unexpectedly, Lygus hesperus density in cotton increased continually, and cotton was able to
retain some Lygus hesperus migrants from alfalfa, even when Lygus hesperus net movement was
negative in cotton. It is somewhat puzzling to have observed Lygus hesperus net movement favoring
alfalfa while simultaneously observing increases in EW-marked Lygus hesperus retention and population
in cotton. This phenomenon indicates that calculation of Lygus hesperus net movement did not account
for actual Lygus hesperus population changes due to intercrop movement between cotton and alfalfa.
Although differences in crop structure, combined with the chosen sampling method, may have led to
overestimation of Lygus hesperus densities in alfalfa, it is likely that naturally higher Lygus hesperus
densities in alfalfa and naturally high Lygus hesperus intercrop movement between cotton and alfalfa
may have contributed to said overestimation. Many Lygus hesperus from alfalfa may have visited cotton,
but most returned to alfalfa. Only a few actually settled in cotton. Each time a large number of Lygus
hesperus move from alfalfa to cotton, a few Lygus hesperus may remain and settle, which explains the
steady, gradual Lygus hesperus population increase in cotton. However, since most returned to alfalfa,
Lygus hesperus net movement calculations indicated high Lygus hesperus influx into alfalfa.
Because Lygus hesperus is highly mobile, and moves quite freely back and forth between hosts in the
open agroecosystem, currently available knowledge and technology are insufficient to accurately
quantify net movement mathematically, as opposed to in a hypothetical closed ecosystem with only
unidirectional movement.
CONCLUSION AND FUTURE RESEARCH
Lygus hesperus
Sub-populations in agricultural field crops and host habitats continuously interact, and these interactions
represent an excellent opportunity for exploitation in Lygus hesperus metapopulation management. This
is particularly true, given that even if all Lygus hesperus are removed from a specific crop field, Lygus
hesperus source populations residing in nearby habitats will continue to exert considerable re-
colonization pressure and pose an infestation risk. Managing pests at the landscape-level via intelligent
exploitation of metapopulation dynamics may prove to be sustainable, economical, and environmentally
conscious tool for use in conjunction with other methods in an integrated pest management system. In
fact, development of elegant, environmentally conscious pest management approaches requires a deeper
understanding of metapopulation dynamics. Further detailed investigations of Lygus hesperus
metapopulation dynamics in the Texas High Plains is necessary for continued development of landscape-
level, sustainable, integrated approaches to L. hesperus management.
228 World Cotton Research Conference on Technologies for Prosperity
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
This project was partially funded by Cotton Incorporated Core Program, USDA CSREES RAMP,
International Cotton Research Center, and Plains Cotton Growers, Inc.
REFERENCES
[1] Barman, A. K., Parajulee, M. N., and Carroll, S. C. (2010) - Relative preference of Lygus hesperus (Hemiptera: Miridae) to
selected host plants in the field. Insect Sci. 17: 542-548.
[2] Day, W. H. (1996) - Evaluation of biological control of the tarnished plant bug (Hemiptera: Miridae) in alfalfa by the
introduced parasite Peristenus digoneutis (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). Environ. Entomol. 25: 512-518.
[3] Frisbie, R. E., Crawford, J. L., Bonner, C. M., and Zalom, F. G. (1989) - Implementing IPM in cotton. In R. E. Frisbie, K.
M. El.Zik, and L. T. Wilson [eds.]. Integrated Pest Management Systems and Cotton Production. John Wiley & Sons, New
York, NY. pp. 389-412
[4] Fleischer, S. J., Gaylor, M. J., and Hue, N. V. (1988) - Dispersal of Lygus lineolaris (Heteroptera: Miridae) adults through
cotton following nursery host destruction. Environ. Entomol. 17: 533-541.
[5] Luttrell, R. G. (1994) - Cotton pest management: Part 2. A U.S. perspective. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 39: 527-542.
[6] Mueller, S.C., Summers, C. G., and Goodell, P. B. (2005) - Strip cutting alfalfa for Lygus management: Forage quality
implications. Crop Manage, http://www.plantmanagementnetwork.org/pub/cm/research/2005/Lygus/
[7] National Agricultural Statistics Service, web page,
http://www.nass.usda.gov/Statistics_by_Subject/index.php?sector=CROPS
[8] Parajulee, M. N., Arnold, M. D., Carroll, S. C., Cranmer, A. M., Shrestha, R. B. and Bommireddy, P. L. (2003) - Lygus
abundance on wild hosts: A survey across the Texas High Plains,. In Proc. Beltwide Cotton. Conf., National Cotton
Council, Memphis, TN. pp. 970-973
[9] Sevacherian, V., and Stern, V. M. (1974) - Host plant preference of Lygus bugs in alfalfa-interplanted cotton fields.
Environ. Entomol. 3: 761-766.
[10] Sevacherian, V., and Stern, V. (1975) - Movement of Lygus bugs between alfalfa and cotton. Environ. Entomol. 4: 163-165.
[11] Snodgrass, G. L., Scott, W. P. and Hardee, D. D. (2000) - Results from two years of an experiment on tarnished plant bug
control in cotton through reduction in numbers of early-season wild host plants, pp. 1229-1233. In Proc. Beltwide Cotton
Conference, National Cotton Council, Memphis, TN.
[12] Williams. (2011)-Cotton insect losses-2010. In Proceedings, Beltwide Cotton Conf., National Cotton Council,
Memphis, TN.
150 SC) or
organophosphorous ingredients such as profenofos (CALFOS
, in Mali and
Cameroon). These devices have a reservoir which is carried on the back of sufficient capacity (10 litres).
This technique uses the wind to help spread the toxic mixture (water plus insecticide) which always
carries an increased risk of contamination for the operator, especially when the wind changes direction
during spraying.
ADVANTAGES OF THRESHOLD-BASED PROGRAMMES
In French sub-Saharan Africa the main advantages expected for protection programmes using thresholds
(threshold programmes) are economic, combining a reduction in the insecticide use, number of
applications or quantity and increase of yields.
Insecticide Reduction
When pest pressure is low, programmes using sensu stricto thresholds, such as in Mali and Cameroon,
lead to a reduction in the number of treatments. For example, in Cameroon the LOIC programme, tested
over 2,000 hectares in 2006 and 2007, led to a reduction in the number of sprays in five of the 17 villages
that were monitored (Brvault et al., 2009). In 2008, the farmers who adopted this programme carried out
less insecticide treatments than other growers and their average cottonseed yields were no lower
(Bertrand et al., 2010).
But the application of thresholds does not always lead to a reduction of all insecticide used. In Togo
in 1995, before the implementation of the current reinforced programme, 50% savings in cypermethrin
were noted by Ayeva and Agossou (2000) with, however, additional use of chlorpyrifos-ethyl to control
infestations of the leaf-eating caterpillar H. derogata.
Yield Increase
When reducing the number of applications and the volume of insecticides used, there is often an increase
in average yields in fields which are protected by threshold programmes. This increase in yield, which
could in part be due to closer monitoring in the fields, is dependant on the weather and agronomic
conditions. In Mali in 2010, an average yield of 833kg of seed cotton per hectare was achieved with the
application of sensu stricto application thresholds, whereas it was 1,051kg two years earlier. In
Cameroon in 2009, a comparison of the conventional and LOIC programmes on 266 producers fields
showed a gain of 259kg/ha of cottonseed in favour of the latter programme (Gautier et al., 2010).
250 World Cotton Research Conference on Technologies for Prosperity
Economic Balance
Reducing the quantity of insecticides sprayed leads to economic savings. Ayeva and Agossou (2000), in
a comparison of the same 20 fields in Togo in 1995, identified a monetary saving of 30% in the costs
when using LEC programmes compared to the conventional programme. In Cameroon, Gauthier et al.
(2010) identified an additional cost of 1335cfa/ha (= 2.0) with the conventional spray programme.
Calculating margins is an analysis tool often used for comparing crop protection programmes. Thus
COMPACI et al. (2010) have calculated the margins after repayment of inputs (MARI) in the case of
calendar-based (conventional), threshold and LEC programmes (Tab. 4).
In Benin, the Matthess et al. (2005) study concerned three programmes actually used in the country,
conventional, organic cotton and LEC, and two programmes defined by extrapolation, Bt cotton and
fair trade cotton. As in the case of MARI, the net margin determined by these authors was in favour of
LEC programmes. The profitability of the LEC programmes in Benin is also confirmed by Prudent et al.
(2006).
Ecological Impact and Human Health
Lower pollution of watercourses and air and greater conservation of the fauna which regulates pest
populations are ecological advantages which have not been measured in a quantitative way. The use of
indicators of environmental quality is an aspect which merits further investigation. The risk of
contamination to the person applying the treatment has not generally been measured. With the possible
increase in the number of passages when a threshold is reached at the end of seven days, it could be
thought that the risk of contact with insecticides would increase.
MAJOR CONSTRAINTS
Transfer of Knowledge
The first constraints met are those linked to the dissemination of any innovation among smallholders.
Communicating in local languages concepts such as the management of insecticide resistance and
thresholds may present translation problems (Tourneux, 2003). The coexistence of several protection
programmes within the same country, or a new parameter to consider, and several production chains
(organic cotton, fair trade cotton) can further complicate the task of disseminating these programmes to
small growers.
The major constraint is the lack of knowledge of observers on the biology and ecology of Arthropods
(Sinzongan et al., 2004), on sampling techniques and on spotting and identifying problems associated to
pests and their damage, plant diseases and mineral deficiencies. Besides field diagnostic tools such as
pegboards, audio-visual tools and booklets identifying problems are generally available to personnel who
are trained. Beneficial insects (natural enemies of damage-causing insect pests) are also detailed.
Observers are members of farmers associations. Some, such as those in Mali, are qualified neo-literates
and are part of a programme to eliminate illiteracy.
Knowledge about pesticides and spraying equipment is sometimes deficient (Sougnabe et al., 2010),
including the risks relating to their use and guidelines for protecting the user, linked with the problem of
interpreting symbolic messages such as the warning pictograms on bottles (Tourneux, 1993). The option
of creating rural schools, proposed by Ochou et al. (1998a,c), or Champs-Ecoles des Producteurs (CEP),
equivalent to Farmer Field Schools (FFS), offering participative training, have been developed in the sub-
regional GIPD programme (Gestion Intgre de la Production et des Dprdateurs, integrated
management of production and pests) in Mali, Benin, Burkina Faso and Senegal (COS-Coton, 2011). But
this approach is considered as too expensive (Treen & Burgstaller, 2003).
Cotton Pest Management Programmes using Threshold-Based Interventions Developed by CIRAD and its Partners 251
Compliance with Threshold Principles
Independent of the adoption of threshold protection programmes, the economic crisis of the cotton chains
in cotton-producing countries have led to a reduction in the acreages dedicated to cotton growing over the
past few years. Investigations carried out within farmers associations have shown that official
recommendations are not strictly applied, with frequent under-dosing of plant protection products for
economic reasons (Sinzongan et al., 2004) or the inappropriate use of insecticides on other crops such as
cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) and tomato (Sougnabe et al., 2010). Given this context, the increase in the
number of treatments reported in Benin by Williamson et al. (2008) appears difficult to interpret.
Strict compliance with recommendations is difficult to obtain for several reasons. Prudent et al.
(2007) have shown, for example, in Benin that planters who have learned LEC techniques find it difficult
to remember the methods a few years after training. The complexity of the observations which have to be
carried out have been mentioned by Sinzogan et al. (2004). Another constraint is the necessity of
conducting weekly observations. Finally, instances of under-dosage, or non-application of insecticide,
despite a threshold being reached, are sometimes seen. The opposite is true too, with cases reported of
treatments being carried out even if the defined threshold has not been reached.
Economic Benefits
At the producer level, the job of observation in the field may be given to paid observers. In Togo, for
example, where an observer carried out the job in 10 fields in 1995, the payment was 100 cfa (= 0.15)
per observation and per field. The payment for this service, when carried out by a third party like this, is a
limitation very often mentioned by owner-producers. Another cost mentioned by producers is for the
management of the insecticides that have not been used for threshold treatments. This cost has sometimes
been included in the purchase price of products destined for producers wanting to apply LEC
programmes, but this discriminatory policy has triggered complaints from the producers involved.
Packaging in 15 litre containers is a handicap in Cameroon because each drum opened and not
completely used must still be paid for.
There are also economic constraints to be considered at the organisational level. The cost of
cascade or stepped training is never mentioned. In the programme offered in the Cte dIvoire, for
example, National Research (CNRA) has to train 205 extension officers, who in turn train 500 producer-
instructors who in turn train 1,500 producers. As a result of this, by 2012 it is forecast that in three years
1,500 producer-instructors and 500 LEC producers will have been trained (Ochou and Amon, 2010).
And yet this training represents a major effort and investment for a number of extension staff (Bertrand
et al., 2010).
CONCLUSION
In French-speaking sub-Saharan Africa, the current situation for cotton protection programmes using
action thresholds reveals a great variation from one country to another. All the same, their development
over significant acreages in some countries provides a measure of the interest shown in this type of
programme by both producers and the organisations which provide them with technical and financial
assistance. The multiplicity of the programmes offered is sometimes, but not always, linked to an
ecological reality. For example, in those regions with endocarpic Lepidopteran species (southern Benin,
Togo and the Cte dIvoire) it is more difficult to envisage the application of thresholds. For cost
reasons, there is no general monitoring of adult populations of Thaumatotibia leucotreta or Pectinophora
gossypiella with sexual pheromones, and producers are reluctant to destroy green cotton bolls to evaluate
the presence of these pests. Furthermore, the rosetted bloom damage caused by P. gossypiella does not
allow an action threshold to be established. The situation for these pests therefore remains unchanged
since the studies presented by Vaissayre (1994).
252 World Cotton Research Conference on Technologies for Prosperity
An increase in this diversity of protection programmes is a reasonable perspective, linked with new
projects under development financed by external institutions (for example, COMPACI, Cotton made in
Africa, Better Cotton Initiative). The GIPD programme, which is under development in Mali, is the only
project until now which seeks to take natural enemies into consideration through the calculation of target
pest/natural enemy ratios, such as those offered in Australia, albeit in a very different context. Producers
knowledge of these beneficial aids to crop production is often limited (Prudent et al., 2007) and a special
effort will have to be made in terms of training.
A simplification of the numerous existing threshold-based protection programmes, logically oriented
by an ecological and a regional analysis would probably be more satisfactory for a better diffusion among
smallholders, and consequently, for a reduction of costs. It will need the development of a network
involving researchers, growers, and all the actors of the production chain. For a large scale monitoring of
the impact of these new programmes, the contribution of producers will be essential.
A future challenge will be posed to pest management in countries which adopt or will adopt
transgenic resistant cotton to Lepidoptera. Until now, only Burkina Faso has very recently grown
genetically modified (GM) cotton over large acreages. According to the available information (Leynaert,
2010, COS-Coton, 2011), the first four treatments in the conventional programme were eliminated,
while the two applications at the end of the cycle were maintained, to control biting and sucking insects.
Research is continuing to evaluate the impact on non-targeted fauna, particularly bugs, and, with National
Research, adjustments are being made to the protection programme. In this context, definition of
thresholds for likely-emerging pests, as Mirids or Pentatomids bugs observed in other countries for
example, will be very useful.
Thus, the challenge is to develop a more theoretical approach for a better definition of threshold -
than the empirical one applied in many cases and at the same time, to succeed by a participative way of
extension and field application of the threshold, with a clear message, a good management of inputs and a
collective evaluation of the economical benefits of threshold-based programmes.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The authors would like to thank the cotton companies who were willing to provide the agricultural
statistics used in this article and in particular Mr Paul Asfom (Sodecoton, Cameroon), as well as Mr Marc
Leynaert (Faso Coton, Burkina Faso) for the technical information pertinent to this country.
REFERENCES
[1] Achaleke, J. and Brvault, T. (2010) - Inheritance and stability of pyrethroid resistance in the cotton bollworm Helicoverpa
armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in Central Africa. Pest Manag. Sci. 66 : 137-41.
[2] Ayeva, B. and Agossou, Y. (2000) - La lutte tage cible au Togo : bilan et perspectives. In : Runion phytosanitaire de
lAfrique de lOuest et du Centre, Lom, Togo, 22-25 fvrier 2000, 242 -254.
[3] Bertrand, A., Brevault, T., Theze, M. and Vaissayre, M. (2010) - De la LEC la LOIC. Comment aider les paysans
prendre en charge la protection phytosanitaire de leurs parcelles de coton ? In : Seiny-Boukar L., Boumard P. (Eds.) Actes
du colloque Savanes africaines en dveloppement : innover pour durer , 20-23 avril 2009, Garoua, Cameroun. Prasac,
NDjamna, Tchad ; CIRAD, Montpellier, France, 12p.
[4] Beyo, J., Nibouche, S., Goz, E. and Deguine, J.-P. (2004) - Application of probability distribution to the sampling of
cotton bollworms (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in Northern Cameroon. Crop Prot. 23, 1111 - 17.
[5] Brvault, T., Achaleke, J., Sougnab, S.P. and Vaissayre, M. (2008) - Tracking pyrethroid resistance in the polyphagous
bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera, in the shifting landscape of a cotton-growing area. Bull. Entomol. Res. 98: 565-73.
[6] Brvault, T., Couston, L., Bertrand, A., Thz, M., Nibouche, S. and Vaissayre, M. (2009) -Sequential pegboard to support
small farmers in cotton pest control decision-making in Cameroon. Crop Prot. 28: 968-73.
[7] COMPACI, CmiA and UdC. (2010) -Proceedings of the workshop: Exchange of experiences in promoting integrated crop
protection in coton production, 31/05- 03/06/2010, Htel Dako 1er, Bohicon, Benin.
[8] COS-Coton (2011) - Mise jour relative au partenariat Union Europenne-Afrique sur le coton. Document du Comit
dorientation et de suivi du partenariat UE-Afrique sur le coton, mai 2011, 96p.
[9] Djihinto A., Katary A., Prudent P., Vassal J.-M. and Vaissayre, M. (2009) - Variation in resistance to pyrethroids in
Helicoverpa armigera from Benin Republic, West Africa. J. Econ. Entomol. 102, 1928-34.
[10] Gautier, C., Sabou, M. and Prudent, P. (2010) - Rapport annuel dactivit. Lutte sur Observation individuelle des chenilles
de la capsule du cotonnier. Campagne 2009/2010. CIRAD (non publi), 60 p.
Cotton Pest Management Programmes using Threshold-Based Interventions Developed by CIRAD and its Partners 253
[11] Hma, O., Som, H.N., Traore, O., Greenplate, J. and Abdennadher M. (2008) - Efficacy of transgenic cotton plant
containing the cry1Ac and cry2Ab genes of Bacillus thuringiensis against Helicoverpa armigera and Syllepte derogata in
cotton cultivation in Burkina Faso.Crop Prot. 28: 205-14.
[12] Houndt, T.A., Ktoh, G.K., Hema, O.S.A., Brvault, T., Glitho, I.A. and Martin, T. (2010) - Insecticide resistance in
field populations of Bemisia tabaci (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) in West Africa. Pest Manag. Sci. 66: 1181-1185.
[13] Kranthi K.R. and Russell D.A. (2009) - Changing trends in cotton pest management. In: Integrated pest management:
Innovation-development process. R. Peshin, A. K. Dhawan (Eds), Springer Netherlands, 499-541.
[14] Kranthi K.R. and Kranthi S. (2010) - Cotton insect pests and their control in the 21st Century. In: Cotton: technology for the
21st Century, Ph.J. Wakelyn & R. Chaudhry (Eds.), International Cotton Advisory Committee, 99-122.
[15] Leynaert, M. (2010) - In: Exchange of experiences in promoting integrated crop protection in cotton production.
Workshop, 31/05 03/06, Htel Dako 1er, Bohicon, Benin.
[16] Martin, T., Ochou, O.G., Djihinto, A., Traore, D., Togola, M., Vassal, J.-M., Vaissayre, M. and Fournier, F. (2005) -
Controlling an insecticide-resistant bollworm in West Africa. Agriculture, Ecosys. Environ. 107: 409-411.
[17] Martin, T., Ochou, O.G., Vaissayre M. and Fournier, D. (2002) - Monitoring of the insecticides resistance in Helicoverpa
armigera (Hubner) from 1998 to 2002 in Cte dIvoire, West Africa. Proceedings of the World Cotton Conference - 3,
Cape Town, South Africa, March 9-13, 1061 - 1067.
[18] Matthess, A., van den Akker, E., Chougourou, D. and Midingoyi, S. Junior. (2005) - Le coton au Bnin: Comptitivit et
durabilit de cinq systmes culturaux cotonniers dans le cadre de la filire. Eschborn, Germany: GTZ (Deutsche
Gesellschaft fr Technische Zusammenarbeit), 206p.
[19] Nibouche, S., Beyo, J., Djonnewa, A., Goipaye, I., Yandia, A. (2003a) - La lutte tage cible a-t-elle un avenir en Afrique
centrale? In: Jamin, J.Y., Seiny Boukar, L., Floret, C. (Eds.), Savanes africaines: des espaces en mutation, des acteurs face
de nouveaux dfis. Actes du colloque, Garoua, Cameroun, 2731 mai 2002. CIRAD, Montpellier, 9p.
[20] Nibouche, S., Beyo, J. and Goz, E. (2003b) - Mise au point de plans dchantillonnage pour la protection sur seuil contre
les chenilles de la capsule du cotonnier. In: Jamin, J.Y., Seiny Boukar, L., Floret, C. (Eds.), Savanes africaines: des espaces
en mutation, des acteurs face de nouveaux dfis. Actes du colloque, Garoua, Cameroun, 2731 mai 2002. CIRAD,
Montpellier, 5p.
[21] Ochou, O.G. and Amon, B.P. (2010) - La protection du cotonnier sur seuil en Cte dIvoire Phase I. In: Exchange of
experiences in promoting integrated crop protection in cotton production. Workshop, 31/05 03/06, Htel Dako 1er,
Bohicon, Benin.
[22] Ochou, O.G., Martin, T. and Hala, N.F. (1998a) - Cotton insect pest problems and management strategies in Cte dIvoire,
W. Africa. Proceedings of the World Cotton Conference - 2, Athens, Greece, September 6-12, 1989, pp. 833 - 837.
[23] Ochou, G.O., Matthews, G.A. and Mumford, J.D. (1998b) - Comparison of different strategies for cotton insect pest
management in Africa. Crop Prot. 17: 735-741.
[24] Ochou, G.O., Matthews, G.A. and Mumford, J.D. (1998c) - Farmers knowledge and perception of cotton insect pest
problems in Cte dIvoire. Int. J. Pest Mgmt. 44: 5-9.
[25] Peshin, R., Bandral, R.S., Zhang, W., Wilson, L. and Dhawan A.K. (2009) - Integrated pest management: A global
overview of history, programs and adoption. In: Integrated pest management: Innovation-development process. Ed. by R
Peshin, A K Dhawan, Springer Netherlands, 1-49.
[26] Poutouli, W. Silvie, P. and Aberlenc, H.-P. (2011) - Phytophagous and predatory Heteroptera in West Africa. CTA & Quae
(eds.), 80 p.
[27] Prudent, P., Midingoyi, S.-K., Aboua, C. and Fadoegnon, B. (2006) - La lutte tage cible (LEC) pour une production
durable du coton. INRAB, Bnin, Ed. GTZ (ProCGRN),105 p.
[28] Prudent, P., Loko, S., Deybe, D. and Vaissayre, M. (2007) - Factors limiting the adoption of IPM practices by cotton
farmers in Benin : a participatory approach. Expl. Agric. 43 : 113-24.
[29] Silvie, P. (1990) - Mussidia nigrivenella Ragonot (Pyralidae, Phycitinae) : un ravageur mal connu du cotonnier. Coton et
Fibres Tropicales 45 : 323-33.
[30] Silvie, P. Deguine, J.-P., Nibouche, S., Michel, B. and Vaissayre, M. (2001) -Potential of threshold-based interventions for
cotton pest control by small farmers in West Africa. Crop Protection 20, 297-301.
[31] Sinzogan, A.A.C., Van Huis, A., Kossou, D.K., Jiggins, J. & Vodouh, S. (2004) - Farmers knowledge and perception of
cotton pests and pest control practices in Benin. Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences 52: 285-303.
[32] Sougnabe, S.P., Yandia, A., Acheleke, J., Brvault, T., Vaissayre, M. and Ngartoubam, L.T. (2010) - Pratiques
phytosanitaires paysannes dans les savanes dAfrique centrale. In : Seiny-Boukar L., Boumard P. (Eds.) Actes du colloque
Savanes africaines en dveloppement : innover pour durer , 20-23 avril 2009, Garoua, Cameroun. Prasac, NDjamna,
Tchad; CIRAD, Montpellier, France, 13p.
[33] Stern, V.M., Smith, R.F., Van den Bosch, R. and Hagen, K.S. (1959) - The integrated control concept. Hilgardia 29: 81-99.
[34] Traore, O., Denys, S., Vitale, J., Traore, K. and K. Bazoumana K. (2008) - Testing the Efficacy and Economic Potential of
Bollgard II under Burkina Faso Cropping Conditions. J. Cotton Sci. 12, 8798.
[35] Tourneux, H. (1993) - La perception des pictogrammes phytosanitaires par les paysans du Nord-Cameroun. Coton et Fibres
Tropicales 48 : 41-48.
[36] Tourneux, H. (2003) - Communiquer avec les paysans dans les savanes d'Afrique centrale. In: Jamin, J.Y., Seiny Boukar,
L., Floret, C. (Eds.), Savanes africaines: des espaces en mutation, des acteurs face de nouveaux dfis. Actes du colloque,
Garoua, Cameroun, 2731 mai 2002. CIRAD, Montpellier, 4p.
254 World Cotton Research Conference on Technologies for Prosperity
[37] Treen, A.J. and Burgstaller, H. (2003) - Cotton IPM. Research success and field disappointment: why are implementation
projects not succeeding? Proceedings of the World Cotton Research Conference-3. Cape Town, South Africa, March 9-13,
1001 - 6.
[38] Vaissayre, M. (1994) - Ecological attributes of major cotton pests: implications for management. Proceedings of the World
Cotton Research Conference-1. Brisbane, Australia, February 14-17, 499 - 510.
[39] Vaissayre, M., Martin, T. and Vassal, J.-M. (1998) - Pyrethroid resistance in bollworm Helicoverpa armigera (Hbner)
(Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in West Africa. Proceedings of the World Cotton Research Conference-2. Athens, Greece,
September 6-12, 701-5.
[40] van Huis, A. (2009) -Challenges of integrated pest management in sub-saharan Africa. In: Integrated pest management:
Dissemination and impact. Ed. by R Peshin, A K Dhawan, Springer Netherlands, 395-417.
[41] Williamson, S., Ball, A. and Pretty, J. (2008) - Trends in pesticide use and drivers for safer pest management in four
African countries. Crop Prot. 27: 1327-34.
tions from N
netically diff
(Andhra Pr
fferences in
eing atleast
and North In
0.342% (me
n laboratory
is very effe
ion and bioa
e a rich sou
it is usefu
ndence on in
cultivation a
about Rs.200
ent 285
North India
ferent from
radesh and
insecticide
5000 fold
ndia.
ealy bugs),
bioassays.
ective as it
agents. The
urce of the
ul for pest
nsecticidal
as use of a
0 per acre.
286 World Cotton Research Conference on Technologies for Prosperity
It is not only specific to cotton but can be used on any crop for aphid, jassid and whitefly management.
Mealy Kill 50EC formulation was supplied to 9 AICCIP centres but was tested at 4 centres namely,
Raichur, TNAU, Sirsa and Faridkot, essentially against mealy bugs. It was tested at 20ml/L in north India
and 10ml/L in South India. It offered 34% reduction when sprayed once at Sirsa and was on par with
other bio-pesticides such as V. lecanii, M. anisopliae and B. bassiana. It was superior to the bio-
pesticides tested at Faridkot. There were no significant differences in yield in the insecticide treated plots
and Mealy Kill treated plots in Faridkot. In Raichur and TNAU the reduction in mealy bugs observed due
to Mealy Kill was 90% that was on par with the insecticidal check chlorpyriphos both in terms of pest
control and yield. Mealy Kill was superior to the other bio-pesticides tested, each, sprayed twice, at these
centres in terms of mealy bug control and yield.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The funding for this work, received from TMC MMI from Ministry of Agriculture, is gratefully
acknowledged.
REFERENCES
[1] Vision 2030, CICR (2011). Compiled by K.R. Kranthi, M.V. Venugopalan and M.S. Yadav. Indian Council of Agricultural
Research, New Delhi.
[2] Tamura K, Dudley J, Nei M & Kumar S (2007) MEGA4: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) software
version 4.0. Molecular Biology and Evolution 24: 1596-1599.
[3] Finney, D.J. (1971). Probit Analysis, third ed. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
[4] Kranthi, K.R., V. Nagrare, S. Vennila and S.Kranthi (2011). Package of practices for mealy bug management on cotton.
ICAC, 29 (1): 13-16.
Which Carbon Footprint Tool for the Cotton Supply Chain 325
TABLE 1: SUSTAINABILITY INDICATORS AND STANDARDS IN THE TEXTILE SUPPLY CHAIN
As can be seen above, greenhouse gas emission levels / pollution is one of the key environmental
indicators to be measured in an outcomes based product sustainability calculation. GHG calculations are
closely aligned with energy use as the majority of emissions sources are energy use derived, like fuel and
electricity consumption for example.
At this point no calculators or mechanisms are available whereby the actual complete sustainability
level or rating of a product can be determined by industry on an outcomes or scientific basis. The only
outcomes-based sustainability calculator for crops that has been released is the ongoing Fieldprint
Calculator from the Field to Market initiative in the US. The five indicators that have been incorporated
at this stage are land use, soil loss, irrigation water use, energy use and climate impact (GHG). Further
indicators in the pipeline include soil quality, water quality, biodiversity and the required social and
economic indicators (The Keystone Alliance for Sustainable Agriculture, 2010). In terms of the
Stewardship Index mentioned above, the first calculators that will be trialed are for water use efficiency,
soil health, nutrient use and energy use (Stewardship Index, 2011).
Eco
I n d ex
Su s t a in a ble
Ap pa r el
Coa lit ion
Pa t a gon ia
Ch r on .
ULE
8 8 0
BCI Cr a d le
t o
Cr a d le
Blu e
Sign
Oeko-
Tex
10 0 0
GOTS
Land Use Intensity *
Water Use & Quality * * * * *
Waste * * * *
Biodiversity * *
Chem. Tox. People * * *
Chem. Tox. Environm. * * *
Energy Use * * * * *
GHG * * *
Social / Labour * * * *
Non Renewables
Pollution
Sust. Governance *
Env. Management * * *
Work Force *
Customers/ Suppliers *
Community *
Pesticides *
Soil Health *
Product Quality * *
Product Safety * *
Resource Productivity *
Consumer safety *
Air Pollution * *
Water Pollution * * *
Worker H & S * *
Noise Pollution *
Child Labour *
Chemical Inputs *
Storage, Pack. &
Transport
*
Chemical Residues *
Tech. Specifications *
CO
2
Which Carbon Footprint Tool for the Cotton Supply Chain 331
Fuel use is one of the standardised emission indicators. In this case the farm used 40 000L of diesel
to grow the 300 hectares of cotton during the 2010 / 2011 planting season (Fig.1). NCEA(USQ) and
ACSC(USQ) are actually two cotton case studies that determined the GHG emission levels of two cotton
operations. As such these studies can be used as benchmarks for the current operation, and when
converted to 300 hectares the NCEA operation would have used 47 700L and the ACSC operation 31
620L which also explains these differences in emission levels. As a standardised item one can actually
determine what the emission levels should be for this amount of diesel use by applying the IPCC energy
content and emission factors for mobile combustion diesel usage. This equates to 360 kg CO
2
e/ha as
indicated by the line on the above graph (2006 IPCC National Greenhouse Gas Inventories 2006). It is
therefore unclear what the results for the Lincoln University, Fieldprint and US Cropland calculators
could be based on.
Soil N
2
O Emissions
Fig. 2: Nitrous Oxide Emissions
Soil nitrous oxide emissions mainly result from fertiliser applications (Fig. 2). As most of the
calculators do not do a separate calculation for soil carbon emissions, some of those emissions may be
included under this section, as well as emissions from stubble decay, although these are less significant.
If one applies the IPCC default of 1.25% direct N
2
O emissions resulting from N fertiliser applications, it
equates to 341 kg CO
2
e/ha. As mentioned although some of calculators may add in some emissions from
crop residues and soil carbon, it still remains uncertain what the amount of 3 650 kg CO
2
e/ha in the case
of the US Cropland calculator could be based on. In the case of the two USQ case studies, the emissions
were not measured but derived from industry estimates and reports.
Crop Residue / Stubble
The Cool Farm Tool is the only calculator that specifies the emissions resulting from different crop
residue management practices. In the case of this study the reduced till option was selected where more
than 30% of the crop residue is left on the surface with the next planting. The corresponding emissions
are 66 kg CO
2
e/ha. The Grains Greenhouse Accounting calculator from the University of Melbourne
estimates this to be 48 kg CO
2
e/ha (Echard, 2009).
332
Soil CO
2
Em
Only
for the ne
the soil w
previously
N
2
O figur
included
calculatio
generated
goes up to
Due t
based mo
being pop
well as to
it is impo
generated
Nett Soil /
missions
three calcula
tt soil carbon
where carbon
y some calcu
res but it is n
in most LC
ns due to th
d in the Cool
o 1750 kg CO
to the compl
dels. The wr
pulated with
validate the
ortant for a
d under conse
Residue Emis
World Cot
ators, field p
n emission le
n can be both
ulators like
not clear from
CA calculati
he potential
farm Tool a
O
2
e/ha.
lexity of the
riters are car
the required
e estimates fr
number of r
ervation farm
ssions
tton Research C
Fig. 3: Calculators
print, cool far
evels, which
h emitted as
the Cotton G
m the site. T
ions. This m
significance
above is und
e carbon cyc
rrying out so
base data fr
rom these ca
reasons to b
ming practice
Fig. 4: Ne
Conference on T
s Showing nett C e
rm and US c
h in reality is
well as seq
GHG calcula
his is an are
may cast so
e of these em
der reduced t
cle, such cal
ome addition
rom this site
alculators lik
be able to re
es.
ett Soil/ Residue E
Technologies fo
emissions from So
crop land (Fi
suppose to
uestered (Jo
ator may inc
a that it is no
ome doubt
mission leve
till condition
culations are
nal research
in order to b
ke the Cool F
eliably quan
Emissions
or Prosperity
il
ig.3) showed
simulate the
hnson et al.
clude carbon
ot standardis
on the cred
els as indica
ns; under no-
e best done
whereby a p
benchmark th
Farm Tool. A
tify these po
d a separate c
whole carbo
, 2007). As
n emissions
sed as yet, an
dibility of L
ated above.
-till practices
by way of p
process-based
hese emissio
As indicated
otential carb
calculation
on cycle in
mentioned
in the soil
nd also not
LCA crop
The credit
s the credit
processed-
d model is
n levels as
previously
bon credits
Which Carbon Footprint Tool for the Cotton Supply Chain 333
It appears from Figure 4 that due to the potential sequestration of carbon, the actual fertilization and
growing of crops could be carbon neutral under reduced till cultivation practices, if one excludes fuel use.
No-till practices will more than compensate for fuel use according to the Cool Farm Tool results. Again
the variance in the results raises concern for any reliable industry or product level comparisons where the
methodologies are not stipulated or standardised.
Purchased Electricity
There is relatively little variance in the emission results from purchased electricity for the four calculators
that quantify this. Purchased electricity is a mandatory Scope 2 emission and should be part of any
product CFP calculation. In the case of agriculture it is mainly used for irrigation and can make up a
considerable part of a farms total carbon footprint, as is the case with these results where it is
comparable to fuel use.
Although one may expect that is another fairly standardised indicator, emission factors vary by
country and according to the look-up table in the Cool farm Tool it varies from 0.0 in the case of Norway
to 2.5 kg CO
2
/kWh for India. In the case of Australia there are regional variances from 0.23 for
Tasmania to 1.23 kg CO
2
/kWh for Victoria (NGERS (Measurement) Technical Guidelines, 2010).
Bio-Chemical Production
Fertilisers
Fig. 5: Emissions Associated with Fertilizer Production
Most of the calculators account for the Scope 3 emissions associated with the manufacture of
fertilisers (Fig 5). The FarmGas calculator is mainly focussed on emissions from farming practices and in
the case of the Veggie Carbon calculator it only deals with Scope 1 and 2 emissions, although PAS 2050
requires the inclusion of these emissions.
Again the results are relatively consistent compared to some of the other emission indicators. In the
interest of comparability, Urea was used as the standard fertiliser in the calculators as it is commonly
used in Australia along with anhydrous ammonia. However, these calculations do not entail a simple
application of a standard conversion rate for fertilisers in general, as the different fertilisers attract
different emission factors. Only the Cool Farm Tool and the Fieldprint calculators make a specific
distinction between the different types of fertilisers used. The table below shows the differences in
emission levels between using 220 kg N/ha of Urea and Anhydrous Ammonia for soil N
2
O emissions and
those from the production of the fertilisers:
334
In the
ammonia
the case o
generate
calculator
only two
the quanti
CHEMICAL
Few of th
very roug
on-farm p
the Fieldp
e case of bo
than urea (F
of the Cool F
367 kg less
r anhydrous a
of the calcul
ity of fertilise
PRODUCTION
e calculators
gh estimate
pollution em
print calculat
World Cot
F
oth calculato
Fig. 6). How
Farm Tool a
s emissions
ammonia wi
lators actual
er N applie
s estimate thi
s (Fig. 7). T
missions wh
tors the estim
tton Research C
Fig. 6: Emission Lev
ors, the fertil
wever, in the
applying the
per hectare
ill generate 1
ly make this
ed, as the diff
Fig. 7: Emissi
is Scope 3 em
They also onl
ich are very
mates are ma
Conference on T
vels by Type of Nit
liser product
case of soil
same amou
than with
179 kg more
s distinction
fferences abo
ons Due to Chemic
mission sepa
ly account fo
difficult to
ainly based o
Technologies fo
trogenous Fertilize
tion emissio
N
2
O emissi
unt of nitroge
Urea, where
N
2
O emissio
for the types
ove indicate.
cal Production
arately, and in
for the produ
determine. W
on the numbe
or Prosperity
er
n levels are
ions the resu
en with Anh
eas in the c
ons than ure
s of fertiliser
n general the
uction emissi
With both th
er of chemica
higher for
ults are incon
hydrous Amm
case of the
ea. It is conce
rs used, inst
ese results ar
ions and not
he Cool Farm
al applicatio
anhydrous
nsistent. In
monia will
Fieldprint
erning that
ead of just
re based on
the actual
m Tool and
ns without
specifying
and NCEA
cotton pro
cotton pro
conclusion
carbon foo
On-Farm/
It may be
the farm a
emission
taken into
Emissions
From a ca
the differe
emission l
that addre
g the quantiti
A case studie
oduction in A
oduction in t
ns as to the
otprint.
Off-Farm Emi
of interest to
as far the agr
indicator res
o consideratio
by SourceCo
arbon manag
ent emission
levels it was
esses all the e
Which
ies and activ
es the basis f
Australia as
the United S
relative imp
issions
o establish w
ricultural pha
sults of the d
on, it is possi
ool Farm Tool
gement persp
n indicators t
s decided to l
emission sou
Fi
Carbon Footpr
ve ingredient
for the result
opposed to
States. With t
act that chem
whether the m
ase is concer
different calc
ible to draw
Fig. 8: Nett and
pective it is i
to a product
look at the re
urces, the Coo
ig. 9: Emission Sou
rint Tool for the
s involved. W
ts is the estim
what the tw
the big diffe
mical produc
major part of
rned (Fig.8).
culators, and
a sensible co
d Total on and Off-
important to
s total carbo
esults of only
ol Farm Too
urces Estimated b
Cotton Supply C
What is notew
mated quantit
wo US-based
erences in th
ction emissio
f a products
Due to the c
d the fact tha
onclusion in
-farm Emissions
establish wh
on footprint.
y one calcula
ol appears to
y the Cool Farm To
Chain
worthy is tha
ty of chemic
d models esti
e results it i
ons could hav
emissions o
considerable
at not all the
this regard.
hat the relativ
Again due
ator, and as i
be the most
ool
at in the case
cals used per
imate will b
s difficult to
ve on a prod
ccur on the f
variances be
e emission s
ve contributi
to the varian
it is the only
suitable in th
335
e of ACSC
r hectare of
be used for
o draw any
ducts total
farm or off
etween the
sources are
ions are of
nces in the
y calculator
his regard.
336 World Cotton Research Conference on Technologies for Prosperity
To gauge to total effect of fertiliser applications one should combine the soil N
2
O levels with the
fertiliser production emissions, which makes it the single biggest contributing factor to a crops total
carbon footprint. As irrigated cotton in mainly grown in fairly arid environments, electricity (or diesel)
use for irrigation will always be an important factor, but can also be affected by rainfall as the growing
and rainfall seasons often coincide for cotton.
One of the major contributions that CFP calculators can make is to show the potential benefits that
conservation farming practices can have to buffer or offset other emissions associated with growing a
crop, as clearly shown above. It was mentioned earlier than in the event of a no-till practice; the carbon
credit will have increased to 1750 kgs CO
2
per hectare according to the calculators estimate. One will
expect fuel use to be a significant contributor in capital intensive farming operations, as is the case with
cotton farming in Australia.
CONCLUSION
The following conclusions are drawn from the results:
There is a compelling need for an internationally standardised format and methodology for crop-
level carbon footprint (CFP) calculations for the textile supply chain
CFP tools, applied to the same farm data, generated vastly different results. Variations in
outcomes are mainly due to differences in structure and methodologies applied.
CFP calculators can play a valuable role in quantifying and acknowledging the positive outcomes
that conservation farming practices can have on mitigating the emission levels of farm products
No common methodology exists in particular for the calculation of soil carbon emissions
Further research needs to be undertaken to apply process-based models to validate the accuracy
of soil emission results from CFP calculators.
REFERENCES
[1] IPCC (2006) - IPCC National Greenhouse Gas Inventories 2006, 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas
Inventories, 2006 IPCC National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programme and Institute for Global Environmental
Strategies, Japan
[2] British Standards Institution. (2011) - PAS 2050 Research Report, British Standards Institution, London.
[3] Carbon Trust. (2008) - PAS 2050: 2008 - Specification for the assessment of the life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of
goods and services, Carbon Trust, London.
[4] DoCCaE Efficiency (2011a) - Carbon Credits Bill. Department of Climate Change and Energy Efficiency, Australian
Government.
[5] DoCCaE Efficiency (2011b) - Clean Energy Bill Department of Climate Change and Energy Efficiency, Australian
Government.
[6] Echard, R. (2009) - Grains Greenhouse Accounting, University of Melbourne, viewed 21 September 2011.
[7] Eco Index. (2011) - Eco Index Apparel Tool, Sustainable Apparel Coalition, viewed 15 September 2011,
<http://www.ecoindexbeta.org/>.
[8] Environmental Leader. (2010) - 72% of UK consumers: Give us carbon footprint labels on food, Environmental Leader,
viewed 12 January 2010.
[9] Johnson, J.M.F., Franzluebbers, A.J., Weyers, S.L. and Reicosky, D.C. (2007) - Agricultural opportunities to mitigate
greenhouse gas emissions, Environmental Poll., 150: 10724.
[10] Kim, B, Neff, R. (2009). Measurement and communication of greenhouse gas emissions from U.S. food consumption via
carbon calculators, Ecol. Econ., 69: 18696.
[11] Miller, V. (2008) - Weighing in, Guardian, 8 February 2008, p. 2.
[12] NGERS (2010) - NGERS (Measurement) Technical Guidelines, Department of Climate Change and Energy Efficiency,
Canberra.
[13] PCF World Forum. (2011) - ISO 14067 - Carbon Footprint of Products, PCF World Forum, viewed 12 September 2011.
[14] Planet Ark. (2010) - Carbon Reduction Label - Frequently asked questions, Planet Ark, viewed 26 July 2010.
[15] Russell, S. (2011) - Corporate Greenhouse Gas Inventories for the Agricultural Sector: Proposed accounting and reporting
steps, World Resources Institute, Washington.
[16] Stewardship Index. (2011) - Stewardship Index for Speciality Crops, Stewardship Index, viewed 27 July 2010.
[17] The Carbon Trust. (2010) - Footprint Expert, Carbon Trust, viewed 24 May 2010.
[18] The Economist. (2011) - Following the footprints, The Economist, vol. Q2 2011.
Which Carbon Footprint Tool for the Cotton Supply Chain 337
[19] The Greenhouse Gas Protocol Initiative. (2001) - Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard, World Resources Institute
& World Business Council for Sustainable Development, Washington.
[20] The Greenhouse Protocol Initiative. (2010) - Measurement of GHG emissions, The Greenhouse Protocol Initiative, viewed
24 August 2010.
[21] The Keystone Alliance for Sustainable Agriculture. (2010) - Field to Market, The Keystone Center, Keystone.
[22] Von Wirn-Lehr, S. (2001). Sustainability in agriculture - An evaluation of principal goal-oriented concepts to close the gap
between theory and practice, Agric. Ecosys. Environ., 84: 115129.
[23] World Resources Institute & World Business Council for Sustainable Development. (2011) - The Greenhouse Gas Protocol
Initiative: Product accounting and reporting standard, World Resources Institute & World Business Council for
Sustainable Development, Washington.
m
o
l
(
C
O
2
)
m
2
s
-
1
)
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
(b)
T
l
(C)
24 26 28 30 32 34 36
g
s
(
m
o
l
(
H
2
O
)
m
2
s
-
1
)
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
A Thermal Optimum Approach to Irrigation Scheduling in Australian Drip Irrigated Cotton 373
observed standard error of 0.124 mol (H
2
O) m
2
s
-1
(R
2
= 0.50; P<0.001) (Fig. 2b). Although the fit of
these regressions was not particularly strong, obvious trends in gas exchange were observed with peak A
and g
s
occurring at ~ 29C. These regressions are weakened by the limitation in the range of data as field-
based data were collected over a relatively narrow (but representative of commercial irrigated Australian
cotton systems) range of T
l
(26 34 C). Hence, there are no data providing leverage to the regression
with low A and g
s
due to low or high T
l
. The range of T
l
that represent A equal to that of the calculated
peak assimilation (29.3C) occurred between 27.5 and 31.2C, whilst the range for peak stomatal
conductance (29.1C) occurred between 26.8 and 30.5C.
Time Threshold
Average T
c
and ST displayed a positive linear relationship (R
2
= 0.97; P<0.001), where average ST
increased by approximately 1 h for every 1 C increase in average T
c
(Fig. 3). Using this relationship, a
temperature threshold of 28 C is expected to produce an average daily ST of 5.3 h. Because average
daily ST is calculated from T
c
, and associations are auto correlated, this value can only be considered a
rough estimate of the ST threshold for irrigation, required to produce peak yields. The association
between average daily ST and lint yield showed similar results to the approach used in Fig. 3. A
quadratic relationship was fitted to average daily ST and lint yield (R
2
= 0.89; P<0.001; y = -81.49x
2
+
618.98x + 2293.06), where peak lint yields were observed between 2.6 and 5.0 ST h, with an average of
3.8 ST h. This suggests that in practice, lint yield reductions occurred when average daily ST > 5.0 h.
Fig. 3: Association between Canopy Temperature (Tc) and Average Daily Stress Time (ST) (P<0.001) (R2 = 0.97;
Y = 1.05x -24.12). when Tc = 28 C, Average Daily ST = 5.3 h.
DISCUSSION
In arid environments, plant temperatures can range from significantly less than air temperature under
optimal water status to significantly higher than air temperature when plant water status is less than
optimal (Mahan et al., 2010). Therefore, T
c
can potentially be used to infer transpiration rates, and
provide a basis for determining plant water stress. Average T
c
in this study reflected this trend, where T
c
increased with decreasing water supply. Using a split-line regression (Fig. 1), lint yield reductions
occurred when T
c
> 28 C. On the semi-arid Texas High Plains, Wanjura et al. (1990; 1992; 1988) took a
different approach to determining the temperature threshold. They hypothesised that maximising the
amount of time T
c
were at the optimum or within the TKW, lint yields should also be maximised.
Wanjura et al. (1990; 1992; 1988) showed that when cotton irrigations were scheduled, if the average T
c
during a 15 min period exceeded a pre-determined temperature threshold of 26, 28, 30 or 32 C, lint
yields were consistently highest in the 28 C temperature threshold.
5.3 h ST
T
c
(C)
24 26 28 30 32
S
t
r
e
s
s
t
i
m
e
(
h
)
0
2
4
6
8
10
374 World Cotton Research Conference on Technologies for Prosperity
Gas exchange provide a measure of the degree of drought stress imposed on a crop and the response
of leaf gas exchange measurements have been used to detect and quantify water stress (Baker et al.,
2007). Therefore, leaf A and g
s
were used as surrogates for plant performance at a given T
l
. The peak in
gas exchange parameters, both A and g
s
, occurred at T
l
of ~ 29 C (Fig. 2). This initially suggested that,
when measured in the same cultivar, the optimum for gas exchange in field grown Australian cotton may
be slightly higher than the historical temperature optimum (Burke, 1990), and the threshold for yield
reductions due to excessively high T
c
(Fig. 1). However, the range of T
l
that produced optimum gas
exchange rates equal to that of the peak at 29 C occurred between 26.8 C and 31.2 C. This range in
optimum temperatures was similar to the TKW for cotton (23.5 C to 32 C) and encompassed the
optimum temperature for cotton metabolism (28 C) as outlined by Burke et al. (1988). Therefore, we
conclude that the thermal optimum for the Australian cotton cultivar Sicot 70BRF is about 28 C, which
is consistent with the optimum temperature of cotton growth and metabolism outlined in a recent review
by Burke and Wanjura (2010).
The ST threshold was also evaluated in this study. The ST threshold represents the site-specific
average daily period of time that T
c
can be expected to exceed the thermal optimum, regardless of soil
water availability (Mahan et al., 2005). Using a temperature threshold of 28 C, T
c
-ST associations
showed a corresponding ST of 5.3 h (Fig. 3), while yield-ST associations showed a reduction in yield
when ST > 5.0 h. This suggests that in practice, peak yields can be achieved in drip irrigated cotton
grown at Narrabri with a ST threshold of up to 5.0 h. On the semi-arid Texas High Plains, Wanjura et al.
(2006) observed a negative linear response of lint yield with ST where an increase in 1 h ST resulted in a
decrease of 343 kg lint ha
-1
(19% reduction ST h
-1
). In this environment, the highest lint yields were
observed at about 5.5 h ST, and a curvilinear response was not observed. However, this response was
observed over a smaller range of ST (6 9 h ST compared with 2 9 h ST in our study), and when our
data are restricted to this range, a linear response is observed (R
2
= 0.79) where an increase in 1 h ST
resulted in a 513 kg lint ha
-1
yield reduction (15% reduction ST h
-1
).
CONCLUSION
This paper represents the first step in developing the temperature and time thresholds required for
efficient plant based irrigation scheduling in the semi-arid cotton growing region of Narrabri, Australia. It
is recommended that a temperature threshold of 28 C and a time threshold of 5 h are employed in the
system, to produce peak lint yields with the most efficient use of water. This approach is limited to
irrigation systems that have a high capacity to supply water at small time intervals (drip/sprinkler
irrigation), and is site specific. Future work should further investigate the utility of the system in
Australian production systems, such as furrow and large deficit irrigation systems, and may need to
assess the environmental conditions where canopy temperatures are inefficient in detecting plant water
stress, such as high vapour pressure deficit environments.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
This study was funded by the Cotton Catchment Communities Cooperative Research Centre and the
Cooperative Research Centre for Irrigation Futures, with further support from the University of Sydney.
Thanks to Merry Errington, Nicola Cottee, Jo Price, Jono Cuell, Mitch Cuell, Martyn Tann and Meghan
Smith in Narrabri for technical assistance. We are grateful to Steven Yeates for agronomic advice and
providing the crop factor. Further thanks to Michael Bange and Greg Constable, for advice and reviewing
the manuscript.
REFERENCES
[1] Allen R.G., Pereira L.S., Raes D. and Smith M. (1998)- Crop Evapotranspiration: Guidelines for computing Crop Water
Requirements -Irrigation and Drainage Paper no. 56, Food and Agricultural Organisation, Rome, Italy.
[2] Baker J.T., Gitz D.C., Payton P., Wanjura D.F. and Upchurch D.R. (2007) - Using Leaf Gas Exchange to Quantify Drought
in Cotton Irrigated Based on Canopy Temperature Measurements - Agronomy Journal, 99: 637644. DOI: 10.2134/agronj
2006. 0062.
A Thermal Optimum Approach to Irrigation Scheduling in Australian Drip Irrigated Cotton 375
[3] Bureau of Meteorology (2009) - Bureau of Meteorology: Climate Data Online, in: T. A. Government (Ed.).
[4] Burke J.J. (1990) - Variation Among Species in the Temperature Dependence of the Reappearence of Variable
Fluorescence Following Illumination - Plant Physiology, 93: 652656.
[5] Burke J.J. and Upchurch D.R. (1989) - Leaf temperature and transpirational control in cotton - Environmental and
Experimental Botany, 29:487492.
[6] Burke J.J and, Wanjura D.E. (2010) - Plant Responses to Temperature Extremes- In: J. M. Stewart, et al. (Eds.), Physiology
of cotton, Springer Science+Business Media, New York.
[7] Burke J.J., Mahan J.R. and Hatfield J.L. (1988) - Crop-specific Thermal Kinetic Windows in Relation to Wheat and Cotton
Biomass Production - Agronomy Journal, 80: 553556.
[8] Hatfield J.L., Burke J.J., Mahan J.R. and Wanjura D.E. (1987) - Foliage Temperature Measurements: A Link Between the
Biological and Physical Environments - in: R.J. Hanks (Ed.), Proceedings of international conference on measurement of
soil plant and water status, Utah State University, Utah State University, Logan, Ut USA. pp. 99102.
[9] Hearn A.B. and Fitt G.P. (1992) - Cotton Cropping Systems - In: C.J. Pearson (Ed.), Field crop ecosystems, Elsevier,
Amsterdam. pp. 85142.
[10] Idso S.B. (1982) - Non-water-stressed Baselines - a Key to Measuring and Interpreting Plant Water-stress - Agricultural
Meteorology, 27: 5970.
[11] Jackson R.D., Idso S.B., Reginato R.J. and Pinter P.J. (1981) - Canopy Temperature as a Crop Water-Stress Indicator-
Water Resources Research, 17: 11331138.
[12] Li-COR. (2004a) - OPEN's system variables, Using the Li-6400 portable photosynthesis system, Li-COR Biosciences Inc.,
Lincoln, Nebraska, USA. pp. 14-7 to 148.
[13] Li-COR. (2004b) - System description, Using the Li-6400 portable photosynthesis system, Li-COR Biosciences Inc.,
Lincoln, Nebraska, USA. pp. 17 to 111.
[14] Mahan J.R. and Upchurch D.R. (1988) - Maintenance of Constant Leaf Temperature by Plants -1. Hypothesis- Limited
Homeothermy - Environmental and Experimental Botany, 28: 351357.
[15] Mahan J.R., Burke J.J., Wanjura D.F. and Upchurch D.R. (2005) - Determination of Temperature and Time Thresholds for
BIOTIC Irrigation of Peanut on the Southern High Plains of Texas - Irrigation Science, 23: 145152.
[16] Mahan J.R., Conaty W., Neilsen J., Payton P. and Cox S.B. (2010) - Field Performance in Agricultural Settings of a
Wireless Temperature Monitoring System Based on a Low-Cost Infrared Sensor - Computers and Electronics in
Agriculture, 71: 176181. DOI: 10.1016/j.compag.2010.01.005.
[17] Upchurch D.R. and Mahan J.R. (1988) - Maintenance of Constant Leaf Temperature by Plants. 2. Experimental
Observations in Cotton - Environmental and Experimental Botany, 28: 359366.
[18] Upchurch D.R., Wanjura D.F., Burke J.J. and Mahan J.R. (1996) - Biologically-identified Optimal Temperature Interactive
Console (BIOTIC) for Managing Irrigation -U.S Patent No. 5, 539, 637.
[19] Wanjura D.F., Upchurch D.R. and Mahan J.R. (1990) - Evaluating Decision Criteria for Irrigation Scheduling of Cotton -
Transactions of the A.S.A.E., 33: 512518.
[20] Wanjura D.F., Upchurch D.R. and Mahan J.R. (1992)- Automated Irrigation Based on Threshold Canopy Temperature -
Transactions of the A.S.A.E., 35: 14111417.
[21] Wanjura D.F., Upchurch D.R. and Mahan J.R. (2006) - Behavior of Temperature-Based Water Stress Indicators in BIOTIC-
controlled Irrigation- Irrigation Sci., 24: 223232.
[22] Wanjura D.F., Upchurch D.R. and Hatfield J.L., Burke J.J., Mahan J.R. (1988) - Cotton irrigation Using the "Thermal
Kinetic Window" Criteria -Beltwide Cotton Conference. pp. 183185.
, Nufarm Americas
Inc., Burr Ridge IL.)} at the respective total rates divided into four applications beginning at the MHS
412 World Cotton Research Conference on Technologies for Prosperity
growth stage and continuing every seven to 14 days until EB or EB plus seven days. The MEB
treatments received MC at the respective total rates divided into two applications beginning at the MHS
growth stage or MHS plus seven days and again at the EB growth stage. The EB treatments received MC
at the respective total rates in a single application at the EB growth stage. The NTC received no MC at
any time throughout the season.
Treatments were applied using a CO
2
-pressurized backpack sprayer calibrated to deliver 140 L ha
-1
using TeeJet
XR110-02 flat-fan nozzles (TeeJet Technologies, Wheaton, IL). Plant heights, nodes, and
uppermost fully expanded internode length (distance between fourth and fifth true leaf from the top of the
plant) were recorded for six plants in the center two rows of each plot at each MC application, and plant
height, nodes, and NAWF were recorded for six plants in the center two rows of each plot during early
August of each year. Prior to defoliation, the percentage of open bolls was recorded in a randomly chosen
1-m section of row within each plot. Nodes above cracked boll (nodes between highest first position
cracked boll and highest harvestable boll) and angle measurements of the main stalk relative to the
ground were recorded for six plants from the center two rows of each plot. Prior to harvest, plant
mapping data, including boll distribution and growth characteristics, were collected for six plants from
the center two rows of plot.
The center two rows of each experimental unit were mechanically harvested using a two-row spindle
picker on 12 October 2007 and 17 October 2008. Seedcotton weights for each plot were recorded and
sub-samples were collected for high volume instrumentation analysis and lint percentage. Harvest data
included lint yield, micronaire, fiber length, length uniformity, and fiber strength.
Data for growth characteristics, maturity parameters, lint yield, and fiber quality parameters were
subjected to analysis of variance using the general linear model in SAS version 9.1.3 (SAS Institute, Cary
NC). Means of significant main effects and interactions were separated using Fishers Protected LSD at
p<0.05 or 0.1.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
TABLE 1: EFFECTS OF MEPIQUAT CHLORIDE (MC) APPLICATION STRATEGIES AND RATES ON PLANT HEIGHT, TOTAL NODES,
NODES ABOVE WHITE FLOWER, AND TOTAL BOLLS PER PLANT IN 2007 AND 2008
MC Application
Strategy
MC Rate at Each
Application
Plant
Height
Total Nodes Per
Plant
Nodes Above White
Flower
Total Bolls Per
Plant
kg ha
-1
____
cm
____
________________________
No.
_________________________
Low Rate Multiple
y
0.01 113.23 bc 18.46 4.17 bc 9.58
0.02 108.99 bc 19.93 4.57 ab 10.1
0.025 108 bc 17.5 3.65 c 11.44
Modified Early
Bloom
x
0.025 113.85 bc 18.58 4.58 ab 10.69
0.04 108.07 bc 20.21 4.04 bc 10.67
0.05 101.51 c 19.53 4.03 bc 11.31
Early Bloom
w
0.05 121.85 b 18.89 4.21 bc 11.9
0.07 112.79 bc 19.72 4.32 bc 11.19
0.1 117.85 b 19.38 4.28 bc 12.52
Non-treated Control
_____
139.5 a 21 5.31 a 10.38
P-value
_____
0.0030 0.3391 0.0402 0.3008
LSD
_____
14.505 NS 0.8118 NS
z
Data are pooled over years. Means within a column followed by dissimilar letters are significantly different based on Fishers
Protected LSD test at = 0.1 or = 0.05.
y
The Low Rate Multiple Strategy consisted of four applications beginning at match-head square, and every 7 to 14 days until
early bloom or early bloom plus 7 days.
x
The Modified Early Bloom Strategy consisted of two applications beginning at match-head square or match-head square plus
7 days, and again at early bloom.
w
The Early Bloom Strategy consisted of a single application at early bloom
There were no interactions between MC treatments and years, therefore all data are reported combined
over years. All MC application strategies and rates within each treatment significantly reduced plant
height compared to the NTC (Table 1) similar to the findings of Jost and Dollar (2004), Nichols et al.,
Defining Optimal Application Rate and Timing of Mepiquat Chloride for Cotton Grown 413
(2003), Reddy et al., (1992), Siebert and Stewart (2006), and Wilson et al., (2007). Within each
application strategy, the higher MC rates (1.5x and 2x) did not significantly reduce plant height more
than the normal-use (1x) rates. The 2x rate applied according to the MEB strategy significantly reduced
plant height more than both the 1x and 2x rates applied according to the EB strategy. In contrast to the
findings of Nichols et al., (2003), height-to-node ratio (data not shown), and the number of mainstem
nodes were not affected by MC treatment (Table 1). Neither MC application strategy nor rate affected the
total number of bolls per plant, and there was also no effect on the number of sympodial nodes, the node
of first sympodia, the number of vegetative or sympodial bolls, or sympodial boll retention (data not
shown). Similar to the findings of Johnson and Pettigrew (2006), Oberry et al., (2009), and Pettigrew
and Johnson (2005), most MC treatments significantly reduced NAWF when compared to the NTC
indicating that MC may promote earlier maturity. Higher rates applied according to both the MEB and
EB strategies did not reduce NAWF any more than the lower rates.
Regarding boll distribution, the 1.5x and 2x rates applied according to the LRM strategy, and the 1x
and 1.5x rates applied according to the MEB strategy increased the number of bolls on nodes four
through seven compared to the NTC (Table 2). Mepiquat chloride applied according to the EB strategy,
regardless of rate, had no effect on the number of bolls in this node zone, as well as the LRM using the
1x rate and the MEB using the 2x rate. This indicates that the more aggressive application strategies may
enhance maturity more than the less aggressive EB strategy. All MC application strategies and rates
increased the number of bolls on nodes eight through 10. These results are similar to those of Prince et
al., (2000). The number of bolls in this node zone increased as MC rate increased when applied
according to the LRM strategy. Neither MC application strategy nor rate had any effect on the number of
bolls on nodes 11 through 13 and nodes 14 through 16.
TABLE 2: EFFECTS OF MEPIQUAT CHLORIDE (MC) APPLICATION STRATEGIES AND RATES ON BOLL DISTRIBUTION IN 2007 AND 2008.
MC Application
Strategy
MC Rate
at Each Application
Number of Bolls
on Nodes 47
Number of Bolls
on Nodes 810
Number of Bolls
on Nodes 1113
Number of Bolls
on Nodes 1416
kg ha
-1
___________________________________
No.
___________________________________
Low Rate Multiple
y
0.01 2.08 a-d 2.75 d 1.83 1.17
0.02 2.42 ab 2.77 cd 2.13 1.56
0.025 2.29 abc 3.13 ab 2.48 2
Modified Early
Bloom
x
0.025 2.4 ab 3.06 abc 2.23 1.54
0.04 2.48 a 2.98 bcd 2.08 1.31
0.05 2 bcd 3.1 ab 2.67 1.73
Early Bloom
w
0.05 1.88 cd 3.31 a 2.71 1.96
0.07 2.1 a-d 2.92 bcd 2.67 1.92
0.1 2.17 a-d 3.19 ab 2.92 1.85
Non-treated Control
_____
1.7 d 2.35 e 2.42 2
P-value
_____
0.0698 0.0016 0.1165 0.1562
LSD
_____
0.4759 0.2938 NS NS
z
Data are pooled over years. Means within a column followed by dissimilar letters are significantly different based on Fishers
Protected LSD test at = 0.1 or = 0.05.
y
The Low Rate Multiple Strategy consisted of four applications beginning at match-head square, and every 7 to 14 days until
early bloom or early bloom plus 7 days.
x
The Modified Early Bloom Strategy consisted of two applications beginning at match-head square or match-head square plus
7 days, and again at early bloom.
w
The Early Bloom Strategy consisted of a single application at early bloom.
Most MC application strategies and rates increased the angle of the main stalk relative to the soil
surface compared to the NTC (Table 3), indicating that MC may prevent or reduce the potential for
lodging by reducing plant height and increasing the proportion of bolls retained on lower nodes, resulting
in plants that are less top-heavy. For the LRM and the MEB strategies, the higher MC rates had no
additional effect on stalk angles. Mepiquat chloride at all rates according to the MEB and EB strategies
increased percent open bolls, suggesting that MC may promote an earlier maturity thus earlier harvest.
Within all application strategies, the higher rates did not improve boll opening. Neither MC application
strategy nor rate had any effect on lint yield, lint percentage, or any fiber quality parameter (data not
shown).
414 World Cotton Research Conference on Technologies for Prosperity
TABLE 3: EFFECTS OF MEPIQUAT CHLORIDE (MC) APPLICATION STRATEGIES AND RATES ON STALK ANGLE AND PERCENT OPEN BOLLS IN 2007 AND 2008
MC Application
Strategy
MC Rateat Each
Application
(kg ha
-1)
Angle of Main Stalk Relative
to Soil Surface
(
______
degrees
______
)
Percent Open
Bolls
(
______
%
______
)
Low Rate Multiple
y
0.01 74.38 ab 48.9 ab
0.02 74.88 ab 52.87 a
0.025 74.25 ab 45.97 ab
Modified Early Bloom
x
0.025 72.83 ab 52.85 a
0.04 78.5 a 55.66 a
0.05 80.25 a 54.91 a
Early Bloom
w
0.05 72.63 ab 50.8 a
0.07 65.13 bc 52.78 a
0.1 78 a 50.16 a
Non-treated Control
_____
61.13 c 39.24 b
P-value
_____
0.0586 0.0964
LSD
_____
10.969 9.87
z
Data are pooled over years. Means within a column followed by dissimilar letters are significantly different based on Fishers
Protected LSD test at = 0.1 or = 0.05.
y
The Low Rate Multiple Strategy consisted of four applications beginning at match-head square, and every 7 to 14 days until
early bloom or early bloom plus 7 days.
x
The Modified Early Bloom Strategy consisted of two applications beginning at match-head square or match-head square plus
7 days, and again at early bloom.
w
The Early Bloom Strategy consisted of a single application at early bloom.
These results are consistent with previous research in that MC can reduce plant height and promote
earlier maturity as seen with the effects on boll distribution in lower node zones, NAWF, and percent
open bolls. In most instances, the normal-use rates, or the 1x rates, had the same effects on plant growth
and maturity as did the higher rates. The higher rates, regardless of the application strategy used, seldom
resulted in any plant modifications that would be advantageous to growers, therefore the normal-use (1x)
rates should suffice in environmental conditions that promote excessive vegetative growth, similar to the
conditions in which this experiment was conducted as supported by the plant height of the NTC.
Although these results suggested that the EB strategy was effective in controlling growth, in these
environmental conditions, the MEB strategy may be more appropriate than the EB strategy because it
could allow growers to control growth with more flexibility due to time constraints of applying MC to all
cotton hectares at the EB stage. This strategy may be especially effective in years when excessive rainfall
limits the ability of equipment to travel through the field. The MEB strategy also requires fewer
equipment passes through the field compared to the LRM strategy, allowing for optimal growth control
while avoiding unnecessary equipment operation costs.
These results are inconsistent with the claims from growers that excessive MC rates controlled plant
height poorly in similar environmental conditions, likely because the growers making these claims
applied MC later than recommended in terms of growth stage. Siebert and Stewart (2006) reported
similar findings, suggesting that excessive rates may not be necessary to adequately control plant growth.
Delaying MC application beyond the appropriate growth stage could potentially result in poor plant
height suppression. Another potential reason for this discrepancy could be that growers likely used
glyphosate-resistant (Round-up Ready
) varieties which have the potential for poor pollination and fruit
abortion when glyphosate is used (Pline et al., 2002). Fruit abortion, especially when it occurs on the
lower nodes (occasionally noted with Round-up Ready
om the sand a
gh grafting (
w the two co
to form a de
n inserted in
transferred t
ered with p
as required a
after graftin
root systems
days. Nutrie
ere selected f
ough Grafting. (a) a
(c) A Well-grafted
trials, half-c
h nutrient sol
rate-level (M
of (mM): 2.
O
3
, 1.0 ZnSO
achieved by a
without NaC
0 mM incr
y adjusting
MN = 0 mM N
solution) an
NaCl + 1/8 c
a 3-day interv
Conference on T
ation was co
rge amount o
ected. Plants
led and analy
m hirsutum L
approximatel
were placed
1
PAR, and
and washed w
(Fig. 1). Bri
otyledons, le
eep at the
nto the
to plastic pot
lastic bags t
and renewed
g, the plast
were transfe
ent solution
for further ex
a Cotton Seedling
d Seedling with Two
concentrated
lution is quit
MN) and low-
.5 Ca(NO
3
)
2
O
4
, 0.2 CuSO
addition of 1
Cl addition se
rement per
concentratio
NaCl + half-
nd SMN/CLN
oncentrated
val. The amo
Technologies fo
onducted in
of saline wate
s irrigated w
yzed 30 days
L.) cultivar S
ly 3 cm depth
in growth c
temperature
with water. U
efly, a
aving about
e same posit
incision of t
ts containing
to prevent w
d weekly. W
tic bag and
erred to gree
was renewe
xperiment.
with Shaped
o Split-roots (Graf
nutrient solu
te inadequate
-level of nutr
2
, 0.5 NH
4
H
O
4
, 1.0 MnS
150 mM NaC
erved as non
day until re
ns of NaCl
concentrated
N (SMN = 1
nutrient solu
ount of evap
or Prosperity
the morning
er leaked thr
with non-salin
s after salt str
SCRC 28 w
h in plastic b
chambers und
e of 30. Se
Uniform seed
shaped inci
1/3 of the hy
tion of the h
the plant and
g aerated nut
wilting. The
When a new l
parafilm w
enhouse to gr
ed per day. H
Incision (). (b) P
fting Position ).
ution is good
e. Thus, half
rient (LN) tr
2
PO
4
, 2.5 K
SO
4
, 0.005 (N
Cl (S) to the
n-salt stresse
eached 150
and nutrient
d nutrient sol
150 mM NaC
ution). The w
porated water
g (7:007:30
rough the bo
ne water ser
ress (DAS).
was used in t
boxes (20cm
der a light/da
eedlings with
dlings were
ision was ma
ypocotyl tiss
hypocotyl fro
d closely wra
trient solutio
nutrient sol
leaf emerged
were removed
row under 32
Healthy seed
Part of a Seedling a
d for normal
f- and 1/8 co
eatments, res
KNO
3
, 1.0 M
NH
4
)
6
Mo
7
O
2
correspondin
ed control (C
mM. Two
ts in both si
lution, SLN
Cl + half-co
whole nutrien
r was replen
0) of every
ttom holes
rved as the
the second
m 15cm
ark regime
h two true
selected to
ade with a
sues intact.
om another
apped with
on, sprayed
lution was
d from the
d. Grafted
2/24 and
dlings with
as Shaped
growth of
oncentrated
spectively.
MgSO
4
, 0.1
24
, and was
ng nutrient
C). Salinity
treatment
ides of the
= 150 mM
oncentrated
nt solution
nished with
Increased Nutrient Uptake and Salinity Tolerance in AhCMO Tansgenic Cotton 423
distilled water daily. Seedling plants were sampled and analyzed 42 days after treatment. The experiment
was arranged into a completely randomized design with four replicates. Each replicate had 3 plants.
Data Collection in Both Experiments
Data collected were fresh and dry weight of a whole plant and its organs (leaf, stem and root),
concentrations of mineral elements (N, P, K, Ca, Mg, Fe, Mn, Cu, Zn and Na
+
) in plant tissues, Pn rate
and Chl content in the 4
th
leaf on the main stem from growth terminal at 30 DAS in the 1
st
experiment
and 42 DAS in the 2
nd
experiment.
Determination of Growth Parameters
In the first experiment, plants were removed from pots carefully at 30 DAS. The remaining roots in the
substrate were also collected by washing the potted substrate through a 4 mm sieve. In both experiments,
plants were divided into leaves, stems and roots, and their respective fresh weight (FW) was weighed.
Leaf area was measured by passing the leaves through a LI-3000 area meter (LI-COR, Lincoln, NE,
USA). Dry weight (DW) was determined after oven drying at 75 until a constant weight was reached.
Determination of Physiological Parameters
Net photosynthetic (Pn) rate of the 4
th
fully expanded young leaf on the main-stem from terminal was
taken between 09:00 and 11:00 h on cloudless days when ambient photosynthetic photon flux density
exceeded 1500 mol m
2
s
1
, using a LI-6400 portable photosynthesis system (Li-Cor, Lincoln, NE,
USA). Leaf chlorophyll (Chl) contents were determined as described in He et al. (2002). Briefly, 0.20 g
fresh leaves were placed in a 100 mL test tube. The tissues were homogenized with a polytron after
adding 10-15 ml pure methanol. The homogenate was then filtered and made up to 100 mL with pure
methanol. The Chl concentration in the supernatant was spectrophotometrically determined by measuring
the absorbances at 652 and 665 nm for Chl a and Chl b, respectively.
Determination of Mineral Concentrations
Ashing was carried out by means of incineration in a muffle oven at 45025 until an ash was obtained.
The ash was acid digested (HCl) for the determination of micro and macro elements. Nitrogen was
determined by Kjeldahl procedure. Phosphorus was determined spectro-photometrically (TU-1901,
Beijing, China). The elements potassium (K), sodium (Na), calcium (Ca), magnesium (Mg), iron (Fe),
manganese (Mn), cuprum (Cu) and zinc (Zn) were measured by an atomic absorption spectrophotometer
(TAS-990, Beijing, China) equipped with hollow cathode lamps. Recovery of added known amounts of
standards to samples gave 98105% of expected values for all minerals.
Statistical Analysis
Data were statistically analyzed with DPS Data Processing System (Tang and Feng, 1997). Means were
separated using a t-test.
RESULTS
The 1
st
Experiment
Plant biomass
Salinity stress with 150 mM NaCl significantly reduced plant growth of both SM
3
and CMO
4
in terms of
their fresh weight and dry weight of root, stem and leaves (Table 1). Root, stem, leaf and total plant of
CMO
4
were decreased by 33.9, 45.8, 37.7 and 36.8% in fresh weight and 20.0, 28.4, 30.0 and 24.1% in
dry weight, respectively, while those of SM
3
were decreased by 58.8, 61.3, 65.5 and 62.7% in fresh
weight and 50.0, 56.6, 60.0 and 53.8% in dry weight, compared with their respective NaCl-free controls.
It was noted that the salt-induced decrement in both fresh and dry weights in CMO
4
was significantly
lower than that in SM
3
.
424 World Cotton Research Conference on Technologies for Prosperity
TABLE 1: FRESH AND DRY WEIGHTS OF TRANSGENIC AHCMO COTTON CMO
4
AND ITS WILD LINE SM
3
30 DAYS AFTER SALT (150 MM NACL) STRESS
Cultivar Treatment Fresh Weight (g. Plant
-1
) Dry Weight (g. Plant
-1
)
Root Stem Leaf Total Root Stem Leaf Total
SM
3
CK 6.86a 8.05a 11.09a 26.0a 1.23a 1.10a 1.63a 3.96a
Salt 2.80d 3.11c 3.80d 9.7d 0.64d 0.49c 0.68c 1.81d
CMO
4
CK 5.59b 5.91b 7.60b 19.1b 1.01b 0.70b 1.21b 2.92b
Salt 3.78c 3.27c 4.85c 12.0c 0.83c 0.53c 0.84c 2.20c
*Different letters within a column indicate significant differences at p=0.05.
Photosynthesis
Salt stress significantly reduced net photosynthetic (Pn) rate and chlorophyll (Chl) content in the 4
th
main
stem leaf from terminal for both SM
3
and CMO
4
at 30 DAS compared with their respective control
(Table 2). However, the decrement in Pn (26.9%) and Chl content (17.5%) in CMO
4
was lower than that
of Pn (36.3%) and Chl (24.4%) in SM
3
. Moreover, Na
+
concentration in roots, stems and leaves of CMO
4
was 6.1%, 11.6% and 26.4% lower than that of SM
3
under saline stress, respectively (Table 2). The result
indicated less accumulation of Na
+
in CMO
4
than in SM
3
tissues under salt stress.
TABLE 2: CHLOROPHYLL (CHL) CONTENT, PHOTOSYNTHETIC (PN) RATE OF MAIN-STEM LEAVES AND NA CONTENTS IN TRANSGENIC AHCMO COTTON CMO
4
AND ITS WILD LINE SM
3
30 DAYS
AFTER SALT (150 MM NACL) STRESS.
Cultivar Treatment Na content (mg.g
-1
) Chl
(mg.g
-1
FW)
Pn
(molCO
2
.m
-2
.s
-1
) Root Stem Leaf
SM
3
CK 7.53c 3.33b 4.00c 17.2a 21.5a
Salt 11.50a 13.80a 13.41a 13.0c 13.7c
CMO
4
CK 6.59d 3.03b 3.25c 17.7a 23.4a
Salt 10.81b 12.21a 9.86b 14.6b 17.1b
* Different letters within a column indicate significant differences at p=0.05.
Uptake of some mineral elements
Differences in mineral nutrient content (uptake) and the ratios of Na to other mineral nutrient elements
were observed between SM
3
and CMO
4
under salt stress. NaCl stress increased the content of N, P, K,
Ca, Mg, Fe, Mn, Cu and Zn in the leaves of CMO
4
, compared with the non-stressed control. Whereas in
the leaves of SM
3
, content of P, K, Ca, Fe, Mn and Zn decreased and only N, Mg and Cu concentrations
increased . Similar results were obtained in the stem and root. Moreover, the content of N, P, K, Ca, Mg,
Fe, Mn, Cu and Zn in leaf, stem and root in CMO
4
were higher than that in SM
3
under NaCl stress
(Table 3).
TABLE 3: NUTRIENT ELEMENTS CONTENTS OF TRANSGENIC AHCMO COTTON CMO
4
AND ITS WILD LINE SM
3
AT 30 DAYS AFTER SALT (150 MM NACL) STRESS
Cultivar Treatments Macronutrients (mg.g
-1
DW) Micronutrients (g.g
-1
DW)
N P K Ca Mg Fe Mn Cu Zn
-----------------------------------------------------------Root-----------------------------------------------------
SM
3
CK 7.4c 0.94c 5.56c 0.33a 0.22b 366a 40.0b 28.2c 49.0c
Salt 8.5b 0.97c 5.32d 0.26c 0.17c 174d 28.1c 32.1b 36.0d
CMO
4
CK 7.5c 1.37b 5.95b 0.34a 0.21b 323b 44.1b 23.3d 70.3b
Salt 10.4a 1.75a 7.21a 0.29b 0.25a 258c 53.0a 35.0a 125.0a
-----------------------------------------------------------Stem-----------------------------------------------------
SM
3
CK 8.5c 1.54b 8.60b 0.43d 0.19c 301b 24.2d 26.1c 18.2d
Salt 11.0b 1.24c 8.41b 0.46c 0.22b 225c 31.4c 30.0b 26.3c
CMO
4
CK 7.9c 1.01d 8.40b 0.48b 0.17c 289b 36.1b 23.0d 50.1b
Salt 13.1a 2.07a 9.80a 0.51a 0.26a 379a 43.8a 34.1a 81.0a
-----------------------------------------------------------Leaf------------------------------------------------------
SM
3
CK 15.5c 2.56a 5.50b 1.26c 0.56c 404b 136c 44.0b 83c
Salt 16.8b 1.66c 5.01c 1.22d 0.60b 328d 97d 46.1a 56d
CMO
4
CK 15.3c 2.28b 4.60d 1.31b 0.57bc 375c 213b 36.0d 109b
Salt 18.2a 2.48a 5.80a 1.46a 0.65a 537a 266a 40.0c 139a
*Different letters within a column about root, stem and leaf indicate significant differences at p=0.05.
Salt stress decreased total amount of mineral nutrients per plant in both SM
3
and CMO
4
compared
with their respective control (Fig 2). However, the amount of N, P, K, Ca, Mg, Fe, Mn, Cu and Zn in
CMO
4
was reduced by 4.4, 6.4, 7.6, 24.9, 13.8, 16.1, 12.6, 2.3 and 2.3%, while the amount of N, P, K,
Ca, Mg, Fe, Mn, Cu and Zn in SM
3
was decreased by 49.5, 65.7, 56.8, 58.2, 55.6, 68.9, 67.1, 50.9 and
Increased Nutrient Uptake and Salinity Tolerance in AhCMO Tansgenic Cotton 425
65.3%, respectively. The results indicated that the decrement in CMO
4
was lower than in SM3.
Moreover, total amount of mineral nutrients per plant in transgenic AhCMO cotton were significantly
higher than in SM
3
under NaCl stress.
Fig. 2: Total Accumulation of Nutrient Elements Per Plant in Transgenic AhCMO Cotton CMO
4
and its Wild Line SM
3
30 Days after Salt (150 mM NaCl)
Stress. Means Followed by Different Letters Differ Significantly (p=0.05). Vertical Bars Show SD of Four Replicates with Five Plants Per Replicate
Salinity stress significantly increased the ratios of Na to main nutrient elements in different tissues
for both cultivars relative to their respective control, but the increment of Na/N, Na/P, Na/K, Na/Ca,
Na/Mg, Na/Fe, Na/Mn, Na/Cu and Na/Zn in CMO
4
was significantly lower than that in SM
3
. The ratios
of Na to main nutrient elements in leaf, stem and root of CMO
4
were also lower than that in SM
3
under
NaCl stress (Table 4).
TABLE 4: RATIOS OF NA TO NUTRIENT ELEMENTS IN TRANSGENIC AHCMO COTTON CMO
4
AND ITS WILD LINE SM
3
30 DAYS AFTER SALT (150 MM NACL) STRESS.
Cultivar Treatments Na/N Na/P Na/K Na/Ca Na/Mg Na/Fe Na/Mn Na/Cu Na/Zn
-----------------------------------------------------------Root--------------------------------------------------------
SM
3
CK 1.03b 8.0b 1.37c 23.0c 34.2c 21.1c 188c 271c 154b
Salt 1.16a 10.0a 1.85a 35.1b 59.0a 56.2a 356a 311b 275a
CMO
4
CK 0.88c 4.7c 1.11d 19.1c 32.2c 20.0c 151c 267c 99c
Salt 1.03b 7.3b 1.78b 47.0a 52.1b 50.1b 242b 370a 102c
-----------------------------------------------------------Stem-------------------------------------------------------
SM
3
CK 0.39c 2.27d 0.39c 7.8c 18.4c 11.3c 128c 128c 188b
Salt 1.28a 11.0a 1.64a 30.0a 62.0a 62.2a 442a 456a 537a
CMO
4
CK 0.38c 3.0c 0.36c 6.3d 17.1c 11.2c 84d 130c 61d
Salt 0.72b 6.3b 1.33b 26.1b 51.0b 35.0b 299b 389b 161c
-----------------------------------------------------------Leaf--------------------------------------------------------
SM
3
CK 0.26c 1.6c 0.72c 3.2c 7.1c 9.9c 29b 91c 48c
Salt 0.86a 8.7a 2.88a 12.1a 24.0a 44.1a 151a 316a 262a
CMO
4
CK 0.22c 1.4c 0.71c 2.5d 5.7d 8.1d 15c 91c 29d
Salt 0.47b 4.0b 1.69b 6.7b 15.3b 19.0b 37b 246b 75b
* Different letters within a column about root, stem and leaf indicate significant differences at p=0.05.
0
10
20
30
40
50
N K
A
c
c
u
m
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
(
m
g
.
P
l
a
n
t -
1
)
. SM3-CK SM3-Salt
CMO4-CK CMO4-Salt
0
2
4
6
8
P Ca Mg Fe
A
c
c
u
m
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
(
m
g
P
l
a
n
t -
1
)
.
0
100
200
300
400
Mn Cu Zn
A
c
c
u
m
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
(
g
.
P
l
a
n
t -
1
)
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
b
b
b
b
b
b
b
b
b
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
d
d
d
d
d
d
d
d
d
426
THE 2
ND
EX
Plant Biom
Treat
CMN
CLN
CMN
CLN
* Different lette
In the spl
plant. Th
concentra
plus mod
(CMN/SL
(22.3%), c
and salinit
Photosynth
The uptak
in CMN/S
Treatm
CMN/S
CLN/S
* Differ
Fi
XPERIMENT
mass
TABLE 5
tments
-------------
N/SLN
N/SMN
-----------
N/SLN
N/SMN
ers within a column a
lit-root syste
he root-half
ated (1/2-con
derate level
LN) significa
compared w
ty stress plus
hesis and Na
+
ke and partiti
SLN than in C
TABLE 6: LEAF AR
ments
Sp
SLN CMN
SLN
SMN CLN
SMN
rent letters within
g. 3: Cotton Plants
World Cot
5: FRESH AND DRY WEI
Split Roo
-------------------
CMN 2
SLN 1
CLN 1
SMN 1
------------------
CMN 4
SLN 3
CLN 3
SMN 2
about fresh weight a
m, one root-
was also fe
ncentrated) (M
of nutrition
antly increas
ith the treatm
s moderate n
Accumulation
ioning of Na
+
CLN/SMN,
REA, CHLOROPHYLL (CH
UNDER
Na Content
plit Root S
N 1.3d 5
N 8.1a
N 1.6c 5
N 7.7b
n a column indica
s (a) and the 4th M
tton Research C
IGHTS OF COTTON UNDE
Root
ot
------------Fresh
21.3a
13.3b
18.1a
10.9b
--------------Dry
4.13a
3.02b
3.41b
2.26c
and dry weight indica
-half was sa
ed in either
MN) nutrien
in one side
sed plant gr
ment combin
nutrient in the
n
+
varied betw
especially in
HL) CONTENT, PHOTOS
R UNEQUAL SALT AND N
(mg.g
-1
)
Stem Leaf
5.32b 11.8b
5.77a 13.5a
ate significant diff
Main-stem Leaves
Conference on T
ER UNEQUAL SALT AND
Total Weight
h Weight(g. pla
34.6a
29.0b
y weight (g. pla
7.17a
5.64b
ate significant differ
lt stressed (S
r low conce
nt solution. T
e and salini
rowth in ter
nation with n
e other side (
ween CMN/S
n leaf (12.6%
SYNTHETIC (PN) RATE O
NUTRIENT DISTRIBUTIO
Chl
(mg.g
-1
F f
b 9.2a
a 6.8b
ferences at p=0.0
(b) under Unequa
Technologies fo
D NUTRIENT DISTRIBUTI
Stem
ant
-1
)------------
49.1a
38.6b
ant
-1
)-------------
16.3a
13.3b
ences at p=0.05.
S) and the o
entrated (1/8
Treatment co
ity stress plu
rms of fresh
non-salinity s
(CLN/SMN)
SLN and CLN
%) and stem (
OF ON MAIN-STEM LEA
N 42 DAYS AFTER TRE
FW) (m
5.
l Salt and Nutrient
or Prosperity
ION 42 DAYS AFTER TR
Leaf
-------------------
31.3a
26.3b
-------------------
6.2a
5.3b
other was not
8-concentrate
ombination w
us low nutr
h weight (22
stress plus lo
) (Table 5).
N/SMN. Les
7.8%) (Tabl
AVES AND NA CONTENTS
EATMENT
Pn
molCO
2
.m
-2
.s
-1
12.8a
9.6b
t Distribution 42 D
REATMENT
Total w
--------------
115.
93.9
-------------
29.6
24.2
t-stressed (C
ed) (LN) or
with non-sali
rient in the
2.7%) and d
ow nutrient i
ss Na was ac
e 6).
S IN PLANT TISSUES
1
)
Lea
(cm
2
1
1
Days after Treatm
weight
.0a
9b
6a
2b
C) for each
r moderate
inity stress
other side
dry weight
in one side
ccumulated
af area
.plant
-1
)
345a
164b
ent
Increased Nutrient Uptake and Salinity Tolerance in AhCMO Tansgenic Cotton 427
The leaf area, plant height, Chl content and Pn rate were higher in CMN/SLN than in CLN/SMN
(Table 6 and Fig. 3. a). Clear symptoms of nutrient deficiency were observed in the 4th main-stem leaf of
CLN/SMN, compared with that of CMN/SLN (Fig. 3. b). CMN/SLN had great advantage in
photosynthesis and plant growth over CLN/SMN, although both treatments were imposed with the same
level of salinity to their root systems.
Uptake of Main Mineral Nutrients
CMN/SLN treatment increased the concentration of N, P, K, Ca, Mg, Fe, Cu and Zn in leaf relative to
CLN/SMN (Table 7). Similar trends were also observed in their roots and stems. There was a significant
difference in concentrations of main mineral nutrients between the two sides of a split root for both
treatments. More N (139%), P (40.9%), K (13.0%), Ca (20.9%), Mg (9.2%), Fe (29.9%), Mn (20.5%),
Cu (7.7%) and Zn (25.6%) accumulated in CMN side than in CLN. Compared with SLN, concentrations
of N, P, K, Mn and Cu in SMN was only increased by 18.6, 9.1, 3.7, 16.5, 10.3%, respectively, and Ca,
Mg, Fe and Zn concentration even decreased.
TABLE 7: NUTRIENT CONTENTS IN DIFFERENT PLANT TISSUES UNDER UNEQUAL SALINE AND NUTRIENT DISTRIBUTION 42 DAYS AFTER TREATMENT
Elements Root Stem Leaf
CMN/SLN CLN/SMN CMN/SLN CLN/SMN CMN/SLN CLN/SMN
CMN SLN CLN SMN
M
a
c
r
o
n
u
t
r
i
e
n
t
s
(
m
g
.
g
-
1
D
W
)
N 16.0a 9.7c 6.7d 11.5b 3.5a 2.1b 13.3a 10.8b
P 3.1a 2.2c 2.2c 2.4b 1.5a 1.3b 1.5a 1.3b
K 7.8a 5.4b 6.9a 5.6b 5.3a 3.9b 7.6a 5.9b
Ca 5.2b 5.9a 4.3c 4.1c 4.8b 3.4a 8.5a 7.8b
Mg 3.8a 3.6b 3.48c 3.3d 3.1a 2.8b 4.6a 4.3b
M
i
c
r
o
n
u
t
r
i
e
n
t
s
(
g
.
g
-
1
D
W
)
Fe 291a 263b 224c 256b 104b 139a 290a 263b
Mn 40.0a 31.5d 33.2c 36.7b 30.4a 29.2b 57.3a 58.9a
Cu 33.7a 30.2c 31.3b 33.3a 25.2a 24.5a 29.5a 28.7a
Zn 108b 119a 86d 96c 85a 78b 110a 104b
* Different letters within a row indicate significant differences at p=0.05.
Total amounts of main nutrient elements per plant in CMN/SLN were significantly increased relative
to CLN/SMN (Fig. 4). The amounts of N, P, K, Ca, Mg, Fe, Mn, Cu and Zn per plant in CMN/SLN were
75.3, 43.4, 52.6, 54.1, 33.1, 19.7, 23.9, 24.9 and 63.2% more than in CLN/SMN. CMC/SLC significantly
decreased the ratios of Na
+
to most nutrient elements in different tissues, especially in leaf, compared to
CLN/SMN (Table 8).
TABLE 8: RATIOS OF NA TO NUTRIENT ELEMENTS IN ROOT, STEM AND LEAF OF COTTON PLANT UNDER UNEQUAL SALT AND NUTRIENT DISTRIBUTION 42 DAYS AFTER TREATMENT
Ratios Root Stem Leaf
CMN/SLN CLN/SMN CMN/SLN CLN/SMN CMN/SLN CLN/SMN
CMN SLN CLN SMN
Na/N 0.08d 0.83a 0.23c 0.66b 1.52b 2.75a 0.89b 1.25a
Na/P 0.43d 3.64a 0.70c 3.15b 3.55b 4.44a 7.89b 10.35a
Na/K 0.17d 1.48a 0.22c 1.35b 1.01b 1.48a 1.56b 2.28a
Na/Ca 0.25d 1.36b 0.36c 1.84a 1.11a 1.70b 1.39b 1.73a
Na/Mg 0.35b 2.22a 0.44b 2.29a 1.72b 2.06a 2.57b 3.13a
Na/Fe 4.53c 30.45a 6.84b 29.52a 51.16a 41.52b 40.83b 51.16a
Na/Mn 33d 254a 46c 206b 175b 198a 207b 228a
Na/Cu 39d 265a 49c 227b 211b 236a 401b 469a
Na/Zn 12.2d 67.3b 17.8c 78.7a 62.6b 74.0a 107.6b 129.4a
* Different letters within a row indicate significant differences at p=0.05.
428 World Cotton Research Conference on Technologies for Prosperity
Fig. 4: Total Accumulation of Nutrient Elements Per Plant under Unequal Salt and Nutrient Distribution in Cotton at 42 Days after Treatment. Means
Followed by Different Letters Differ Significantly (p=0.05). Vertical Bars Show SD of Four Replicates with Three Plants Per Replicate
DISCUSSION
Even as a salt-tolerant crop, cotton will be adversely affected in plant growth and development as well as
yield and fiber quality if soil salinity level beyond a threshold of 7.7 dS m
-1
(Chinnusamy, 2005; Maas,
1990). In the first experiment, we found a marked inhibition of fresh weight, dry weight, Pn and Chl
content in both CMO
4
and its wild line SM3 under salinity stress, but the inhibition effect of salinity on
CMO
4
was significantly lower than SM3. The result was in agreement with our previous reports that salt
tolerance of CMO
4
was greatly improved due to the introduction of AhCMO gene relative to its wild line
SM3 (Zhang et al., 2009). In the second experiment, a split-root system was established by grafting of
cotton seedlings, and unequal salt distribution in the root zone was thus constructed by irrigating one root
side with water and the other side with NaCl solution. It was shown that the fresh and dry weight, leaf
area, Pn and Chl content in CMN/SLN treatment were significantly higher than that in CLN/SMN. Since
salinity stress imposed to only half root also greatly reduced plant growth as we previously reported
(Dong et al., 2010), and both CMN/SLN and CLN/SMN were treated with same level of salinity stress
(150 mM NaCl) in the present experiment, CMN/SLN treatment improved salinity tolerance of cotton
compared to CLN/SMN.
0
50
100
150
200
250
N P K Ca Mg
A
c
c
u
m
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
(
m
g
.
P
l
a
n
t -
1
)
.
CMN/SLN CLN/SMN
a
a
a
a
a
b
b
b
b
b
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Fe Mn Cu Zn
A
c
c
u
m
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
(
m
g
.
P
l
a
n
t -
1
)
.
a
a
a
a
b
b
b
b
Increased Nutrient Uptake and Salinity Tolerance in AhCMO Tansgenic Cotton 429
Plant growth is affected by interactions of salt ions and availability or uptake of many essential
mineral nutrients (Greenway and Munns, 1980; Grattan and Grieve, 1992; Romero et al., 1994). Soil
salinity usually reduces uptake of both macronutrients like N (Dluzniewska et al., 2007), P (Rochester,
2010), K (Marschner, 1995), Ca (Yan et al., 2007) and Mg (Grattan and Grieve, 1999), and
micronutrients like Fe, Mn, Cu, Zn (Grattan and Grieve, 1999; Hirpara et al., 2005; Kholov et al.,
2009), and leads to nutrient imbalance in many plant species including cotton (Grattan and Grieve, 1999).
The ratios of Na to nutrient elements (Na/N, Na/K, Na/Ca and Na/Mg) have been used as an indication of
nutrient imbalance (Grattan and Grieve, 1999; Dluzniewska et al., 2007). In the present study, NaCl
stress significantly reduced nutrients (N, P, K, Ca, Mg, Fe, Mn, Cu and Zn) uptake in SM3 and CMO
4
relative to their respective non-saline treatment. However, the salt-induced decrements in nutrient uptake
in CMO
4
was significantly lower than that in its wild line SM
3
, and the absolute amounts of main nutrient
elements (N, P, K, Ca, Mg, Fe, Mn, Cu and Zn) in salt-stressed CMO
4
were significantly higher than in
salt-stressed SM
3
. Also less Na
+
accumulated in CMO
4
than in SM
3
as we reported previously (Zhang et
al., 2009). As a result, the ratios of Na/N, Na/P, Na/K, Na/Ca, Na/Mg, Na/Fe, Na/Mn, Na/Cu and Na/Zn
in CMO
4
was significantly reduced relative to its wild line SM
4
, and thus nutrient imbalance was
alleviated (Table 4). Although previous studies have shown that improved salinity tolerance of AhCMO
transgenic cotton was attributed to enhanced glycine betaine synthesis (Zhang et al., 2009), our results in
the present study further indicated that the increased salt tolerance was also associated with improved
nutrient uptake.
Split-root system provides an accurate system to simulate unequal salt distribution in the root-zone
(Bazihizina et al., 2009; Lycoskoufis et al., 2005). Many previous studies have shown that unequal salt
distribution improves plant growth or salt tolerance relative to equal salt distribution with the same level
of external salinity stress (Zekri and Parsons, 1990; Tabatabai et al., 2003; Bazihizina et al., 2009). In the
present study, treatment combination with non-salinity stress plus moderate nutrient level in one side and
salinity stress plus low nutrient level in the other side (CMN/SLN) significantly increased concentrations
of main nutrient elements (N, P, K, Ca, Mg, Fe, Mn, Cu, Zn) in different tissues, especially in leaf,
compared with the treatment combination with non-salinity stress plus low nutrient in one side and
salinity stress plus moderate nutrient in the other side (CLN/SMN). Similar trends were also observed in
total amount of nutrient elements per plant. The results affirmatively indicated that CMN/SLN
significantly improved nutrient uptake relative to CLN/SMN. Since both treatments were imposed the
same level of salinity stress, we suggest that the improved salt tolerance and plant growth in CMN/SLN
was attributed to the increased uptake of main nutrients. The results further showed that higher nutrients
uptake in CMN/SLN than in CLN/SMN was mainly attributed to much more nutrients uptake from the
CMN side than CLN side (Table 7). The content of Na
+
in CMN/SLN treatment is lower than that in
CLN/SMN, especially in leaf. The result was consistent with Sonneveld and Voogt (1990) who suggested
that unequal distribution of nutrients (EC=0.75/2.5) in the root environment increased N, P and K and
reduced Na
+
accumulation. More nutrients and less Na
+
uptake in CMN/SLN resulted in lower ratios of
Na
+
to the main nutrient elements (Table 8), which might alleviate nutrient imbalance of cotton.
In conclusion, introduction of AhCMO gene to cotton significantly increased salt tolerance of the
transgenic line CMO
4
. Such an improvement in salt tolerance was also associated with increased nutrient
uptake in CMO
4
. There was a clear interaction between unequal salt distribution and unequal nutrient
distribution on plant growth and salt tolerance of cotton plants in a split-root system. Plant growth and
salt tolerance as well as nutrient uptake were significantly improved in CMN/SLN relative to CLN/SMN.
Since levels of external salinity stress and nutrient supply were the same for both treatments, we suggest
that the improved salt tolerance and plant growth were attributed to increased nutrient uptake. It was thus
concluded that improved nutrient uptake can increase salinity tolerance of cotton under salinity.
430 World Cotton Research Conference on Technologies for Prosperity
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
This work was supported by the earmarked fund for China Agricultural Research System (Cotton 2007
2011), the Major Project for Applied Agricultural Research (Cotton 20092011) and Seed Industry
(Cotton 20102012) of Shandong Province, and the National Natural Science Foundation of China
(30971720).
REFERENCES
[1] Bazihizina N, Colmer, T.D. and Barrett-Lennard, E. G. (2009) Response to Non-uniform Salinity in the Root Zone of the
Halophyte Atriplex nummularia: Growth, Photosynthesis, Water Relations and Tissue Ion Concentrations - Ann. Bot.,
104(4): 737745
[2] Chen, W.P., Hou, Z.N., Wu, L.S., Liang, Y.C. and Wei, C.Z. (2010) Effect of Salinity and Nitrogen on Cotton Growth in
Arid Environment - Plant Soil, 326: 6173.
[3] Chinnusamy, V., Jagendorf, A. and Zhu, J.K. (2005) Understanding and improving salt tolerance in plants Crop. Sci.,
45(2): 437448.
[4] Dluzniewska, P., Gessler, A. and Dietrich, H. (2007) Nitrogen Uptake and metabolism in PopulusCanescens as Affected
by Salinity - New Phytol., 173(2): 279293.
[5] Dong, H.Z., Kong, X.Q., Luo, Z., Li, W. J. and Xin, C.S. (2010) Unequal Salt Distribution in the Root Zone Increases
Growth and Yield of Cotton- Europ. J. Agron., 33: 285292.
[6] Dong, H.Z., Li, W.J., Tang, W. and Zhang, D.M. (2008)Furrow Seeding With Plastic Mulching Increases Stand
Establishment and Lint Yield of Cotton in a Saline Field Agron. J., 100(6): 16401646.
[7] Dong, H.Z., Li, W.J., Tang, W. and Zhang, D.M. (2009) Early Plastic Mulching Increases Stand Establishment and Lint
Yield of Cotton in Saline Fields Field. Crops. Res., 111: 269275.
[8] Elgharably, A., Marschner, P. and Rengasamy, P. (2010) Wheat Growth in a Saline Sandy Loam Soil as Affected by N
Form and Application Rate - Plant Soil, 328: 303312.
[9] El-Swaify, S.cA. (2000) Soil and Water Supply. In: Silva, J.A., Uchida, R. (Eds.), Plant Nutrient Management in
Hawaiis Soils: Approaches for Tropical and Subtropical Agriculture, University of Hawaii, Manoa, Available at
http://www.ctahr.hawaii.edu/ oc/freepubs/pdf/ pnm17.pdf. [Accessed 4 September 2008].
[10] Gimeno, V., Syvertsen, J.P., Nieves, M., Simn, I., Martnez, V. and Garca-Snchez, F. (2009) Additional nitrogen
fertilization affects salt tolerance of lemon trees on different rootstocks Sci. Hortic., 121: 298305.
[11] Gorham, J., Lauchli, A. and Leidi, E. O. (2009) Plant Responses to Salinity. In Stewart, J.M., Oosterhuis, D.M., Heitholt,
J.J. and Mauney, J.R. (Eds.) Physiology of Cotton, National Cotton Council of America , Memphis, Tenn Springer,
London, pp 130142.
[12] Grattan, S.R. and Grieve, C.M. (1992) Mineral Element Acquisition and Growth Response of Plants Grown in Saline
Environment - Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. , 38(4): 275300.
[13] Grattan, S.R. and Grieve, C.M. (1999)Salinity-mineral nutrient relations in horticultural cropsSci. Hortic. , 78: 127157.
[14] Greenway, H. and Munns, R. (1980) Mechanisms of Salt Tolerance in Non-Halophytes Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol.,
31:149190.
[15] Harinasut, P., Tsutsui, K., Takabe, T., Nomura, M., Takabe, T. and Kishitani, S. (1996) Exogenous Glycinebetaine
Accumulation and Increased Salt-Tolerance in Rice Seedlings Biosci. Biotech. Bioch., 60: 366368.
[16] He, Y.H., Fukushige, H., Hildebrand, D.F. and Gan, S.S. (2002) Evidence Supporting a Role of Jasmonic Acid in
Arabidopsis Leaf Senescence - Plant Physiol., 128: 876884.
[17] Hirpara, K.D., Ramoliya, P.J., Patel, A.D. and Pandey, A.N. (2005) Effect of Salinisation of Soil on Growth and Macro-
and Micro-nutrient Accumulation in Seedlings of Butea monosperma (Fabaceae) -. Ann. Bio., 27: 314.
[18] Hoque, M. A., Okuma, E., Akhter Banu, M. N., Nakamura, Y., Shimoishi, Y. and Murata, Y. (2007) Exogenous Proline
Mitigates the Detrimental Effects of Salt Stress More Than Exogenous Betaine by Increasing Antioxidant Enzyme
Activities J. Plant. Physiol., 164: 553561.
[19] Irshad, M., Eneji, A.E. and Yasuda, H. (2008) Comparative Effect of Nitrogen Sources on Maize Under Saline and Non-
Saline Conditions J. Agron. Crop Sci., 194: 256261.
[20] Kaman, H., Kirda, C., Cetin, M. and Topcu, S. (2006) Salt Accumulation in the Root Zones of Tomato and Cotton
Irrigated with Partial-Drying Technique Irrig. Drain, 55(5): 533544.
[21] Kholov, J., Sairam, R.K., Meena, R.C. and Srivastava, G.C. (2009) Response of Maize Genotypes to Salinity Stress in
Relation to Osmolytes and Metal-Ions Contents, Oxidative Stress and Antioxidant Enzymes Activity Biol. Plantarum,
53(2): 249256.
[22] Lycoskoufis, I.H., Savvas, D. and Mavrogianopoulos, G. (2005) Growth, Gas Exchange, and Nutrient Status in Pepper
(Capsicum annuum L.) Grown in Recirculating Nutrient Solution as Affected by Salinity Imposed to Half of the Root
System Sci. Hortic., 106: 147161.
[23] Maas, E.V. (1990) Crop Salt Tolerance In: Tanji (Ed.), Agricultural Salinity Assessment and Management-American
Society of Civil Engineering, New York, pp. 262304
[24] Marschner, H. (1995) Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants- Academic Press, London, pp. 889
[25] Martinez, V. and Lauchli, A. (1991) Phosphorous Translocation in Salt-stressed Cotton - Plant Physiol., 83: 627632
Increased Nutrient Uptake and Salinity Tolerance in AhCMO Tansgenic Cotton 431
[26] Meiri, A. and Plaut, Z. (1985) Crop Production and Management Under Saline Conditions-Plant Soil, 89: 253271
[27] Meloni, D.A., Oliva, M.A., Rui, H.A. and Martinez, C.A. (2001)Contribution of Proline and Inorganic Solutes to Osmotic
Adjustment in Cotton Under Salt Stress - J Plant Nutr., 24(3): 599612.
[28] Messedi, D., Labidi, N., Grignon, C. and Abdelly, C. (2004) Limits Imposed by Salt to The Growth of the Halophyte
Sesuvium portulacastrum- J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci., 167: 720725.
[29] Munns, R. and Tester, M. (2008) Mechanisms of Salinity Tolerance Annu. Rev. Plant Biol., 59: 651681.
[30] Rathert, G. (1983) Effects of High Salinity Stress on Mineral and Carbohydrate Metabolism of Two Cotton Varieties -
Plant Soil, 73: 247256.
[31] Rhodes, D. and Hanson, A. D. (1993) Quaternary Ammonium and Tertiary Sulfonium Compounds in Higher Plants
Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol., 44: 357384
[32] Rochester, I. (2010) Phosphorus and Potassium Nutrition of Cotton: Interaction With Sodium - Crop Pasture Sci.,
61: 825834.
[33] Romero, J.M., Maranon, T. and Murillo, J.M. (1994) Long-term Responses of Melilotus segetalis to Salinity, Nutrient
Absorption and Utilization - Plant Cell Env., 17: 12491255.
[34] Sairam, R.K. and Tyagi, A. (2004) Physiology and Molecular Biology of Salinity Stress Tolerance in Plants Curr. Sci.,
86(3): 407421.
[35] Sakamoto, A. and Murata, N. (2001) The use of Bacterial Choline Oxidase, A Glycine Betaine Synthesizing Enzyme, to
Create Stress-Resistant Transgenic Plants - Plant Physiol., 125: 180188.
[36] Shani, U., Waisel, Y., Eshel, A., Xue, S. and Ziv, G. (1993) Responses to Salinity of Grapevine Plants with Split Root
Systems - New Phytol., 124: 695701.
[37] Sonneveld, C., De Kreij, C. (1999) Response of Cucumber (Cucumis sativus) to an Unequal Distribution of Salts in the
Root Environment- Plant Soil., 209: 4756.
[38] Sonneveld, C. and Voogt, W. (1990) Response of Tomatoes (Lycopersicon esculentum) to an Unequal Distribution of
Nutrients in the Root Environment- Plant Soil., 124: 251256.
[39] Sulpice, R., Tsukaya, H., Nonaka, H., Mustardy, L., Chen, T.H. and Murata, N. (2003) Enhanced Formation of Flowers in
Saltstressed Arabidopsis after Genetic Engineering of the Synthesis of Glycine Betaine- Plant J., 36: 165176.
[40] Tabatabaie, S.J., Gregory, P.J. and Hadley, P. (2004) Uneven distribution of Nutrients in the Root Zone Affects the
Incidence of Blossom End Rot and Concentration of Calcium and Potassium in Fruits of Tomato - Plant Soil,
258: 169178.
[41] Tabatabaie, S.J., Gregory, P.J., Hadley, P. and Ho, L. (2003) Split Root System for The Use of Saline Water In
Hydroponic Tomato Sci. Hortic., 609: 307312.
[42] Tang, Q.Y. and Feng, M.G. (1997) Practical Statistics and Dps Data Processing System- Beijing, China Agri. Press,
1407.
[43] Yan, Z.Z., Wang, W.Q. and Tang, D.L. (2007) Effect of Different Time of Salt Stress on Growth and Some Physiological
Processes of Avicennia marina Seedlings Mar. Biol., 152(3): 581587.
[44] Yildirim, E., Karlidag, H. and Turan, M. (2009) Mitigation of Salt Stress in Strawberry by Foliar K, Ca and Mg Nutrient
Supply - Plant Soil Environ., 55: 213221.
[45] Zekri, M. and Parsons, L.R. (1990) Response of Split-Root Sour Orange Seedlings to NaCl and Polyethylene Glycol
Stresses - J. Exp. Bot., 41: 3540.
[46] Zhang, H.J., Dong, H.Z., Li, W.J., Sun, Y., Chen, S.Y. and Kong, X.Q. (2009) Increased Glycine Betaine Synthesis and
Salinity Tolerance in AhCMO Transgenic Cotton Lines Mol. Breeding, 23(2): 289298.
[47] Zhang, H.J., Dong, H.Z., Shi, Y.J., Chen, S.Y. and Zhu, Y.H. (2007) Transformation of Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum.L)
with AhCMO Gene and the Expression of Salinity Tolerance - Acta Agron. Sinica. , 33: 10731078.
[48] Zhu, Y.L. and Ito, T. (2000) Effects of Nutrient Stress by Split-root System on the Growth and K, Ca and Mg Contents at
Different Stages of Hydroponically-grown Tomato Seedlings J. Jpn. Soc. Sci., 69: 677683.
1
Up to 2007, royalties due for using the Chinese Bt gene were paid once and for all at the time of the official registration of a
new Bt cotton variety and not related to the amount of seeds sold. The fee has fluctuated from US$35,000 to 40,000.
2
The laws were first issued in the first half of the 1990s, amended several times, but the decrees of application came into force in
late 1999 or early 2000.
Do Female-Led Farms Perform Less Well in Cotton Production? Insight from Hebei Province (China) 437
exchange seeds with or without monetary compensation. Farmers' practices in using seeds were
addressed in our surveys by asking whether they renewed seeds (instead of using seeds they held back
from the former season), how frequently and from whom (notably merchants).
Production costs were recorded for all the surveyed farms. As the valuation of family labour used is
debatable in rural areas, we did not integrate the family labour cost in total production costs. Cotton
production costs and yields were only obtained at farm level and not at plot level. This was not a
limitation when farmers used only one variety. Collected data were processed to analyse the structures of
farms and farm families, with emphasis on the share of female members and on the involvement of
family members in farm and off-farm activities, respectively.
The present study adopted a criterion that the farms were led by females when the farm heads (the
males in China) were engaged in off-farm activities for at least five months a year. Two groups of farms
namely male-led and female-led were compared with regard to the land areas cultivated, areas under
cotton production, cost of cultivation, and two performance indicators, namely cotton yield and gross
income.
A multi-regression analysis was done to check the extent to which yield was dependent on three
groups of factors. Group 1 was composed of farm structure factors regarding the gender of the farm
managers and the assistance of children in field work. A study on the same set of data revealed that farm
structural factors such as family size, total cultivated area, etc had no impact on yield. Group 2 consisted
of factors related to cotton areas and farmers' behaviour in using varieties and seeds (number of varieties
used, the extent of annual seed renewal, and the frequency of seed purchases from merchants). Group 3
pertained to cost of production (corresponding to seeds, plastic mulching, irrigation, fertilization, pest
control and disease control). Weed control by herbicide, soil preparation, growth regulators, etc were
integrated in "other costs".
RESULTS
For most of the variables related to farm families (Table 1), the data were consistent over the four years,
although the samples varied between years, in terms of both composition and size. In total, survey
covered 2492 family members living in farming families. Feminization, if any, was not due to females
outnumbering males in families. Female accounted for 45.4% of the total population, as against the sex
ratio of 120 (120 males for 100 females), which was well above the common sex ratio of 105-106
worldwide. The sex ratio was quite similar for family members at least 16 years old who could be
considered as potential active labour.
Farm heads were 47 years old in 2009, 0.8 years older than their wives. Globally, their children were
of working age, the sons being almost two years older than the daughters. In 2009, they were 21.5 and
18.6 years old, respectively.
The feminization of Chinese agriculture may be sustained by the higher frequency of females
involved in field work, even though the rate of all permanently involved family members was low.
Among all farming family members with at least 16 year old, only 56.7% were permanently involved in
field work. This is an indication of the specificity of China where agriculture is barely the main
occupation of farming families. As already pointed out, females were less numerous than males, but they
amounted to 55.8% of the permanent field workers. The wives of farm heads were the most permanent
workers in the fields. Over the four years, 91.1% of them were involved permanently in field work, much
more than their husbands (66.2%). The impression of feminization of agriculture was reinforced by the
low participation rate of farm children. Farmers' sons or daughters with at least 16 years old took part in
field work at a rate of 9.0% and 5.2%, respectively.
438 World Cotton Research Conference on Technologies for Prosperity
The observed feminization was the result of greater involvement of male in off-farm activities. Over
the four year period, 94.3% of farm families had at least one member involved in off-farm activities on a
long duration basis (at least five months a year). Males were more involved than females in off-farm
activities (40.8 vs 14.4%) but the large gap was due to the very marginal involvement of farm heads'
wives. Between boys and girls, the gap was far less (56.7 vs 38.3%). In the study, we assumed that farms
were female-led when their husbands were involved in off-farm activities on a long term basis. Over the
four-year period, for the 819 farms from which we obtained detailed product costs, 249 farms (30.4%)
were female-led (Table 2). Cotton farms were tiny in size (0.75 ha of cultivated land) and they were
smaller for female-led farms. 29.4% of farms managed to rent some land. This possibility was more
limited for female-led farms. Considering all farms per capita cotton area was 0.44 ha, but this area was
smaller for female-led farms and also for the cotton area per family member over the age of 16.
TABLE 1: CHARACTERISTICS OF FARM FAMILIES AND THEIR INVOLVEMENT IN OFF-FARM ACTIVITIES
Note: Figures in brackets are total numbers; figures in square brackets are standard deviations.
With regard to variety and seed use practices, there were no differences between farms led by males
or females. In case of all farms 31.1 % use non-Bt cotton varieties, 69.6% farms goes for annual seed
renewal (69.6%) and about 83% of farms source seeds through merchants (83.0%).
There were differences in performance between the two types of farms, but not in the expected
direction. Compared to male-led farms, female-led farms performed better in yield with a similar level of
total production costs. Female-led farms had higher costs to control diseases, but lower costs in a few
cases (irrigation and other costs encompassing, for example, herbicides, growth regulators, etc.). These
differences might be related to higher labour constraints (case of irrigation) or more routine practices
(spraying against cotton plant diseases).
The better performance of female-led farms was more balanced in economic terms. This better
performance was observed in case of cotton production value per area and gross income per area. Since
female-led farms had a smaller area, their total cotton production value and total gross income were
lower compared to male-led farms. This is the reason for lower labour productivity in terms of gross
income per family member over 16 years old in female-led farms.
Features of farm families 2006 2007 2008 2009 All
Number farms surveyed 119 207 360 175 861
Farm demography
% females among all family members 49.7 [366] 44.0 [621] 44.1 [1008] 46.7 [497] 45.4 [2492]
% females among family members 16 years old 49.7 [340] 44.1 [580] 44.1 [966] 45.9 [468] 45.2 [2345]
Number family members 3.1 (1.0) 3.0 (0.9) 3.0 (1.0) 3.1 (1.0) 3.0 (1.0)
Number of children living in farm families 1,0 1,0 1,0 1.2 1,0
Farm family members' ages
average age of farm holder 44.5 (9.2) 45.5 (9.2) 46.9 (8.7) 47.0 (8.9)
average age of farm holder's wife 44.5 (9.3) 44.6 (9.0) 45.8 (8.3) 46.2 (8.9)
average age of farmers' sons 20.8 (6.0) 20.8 (6.5) 22.2 (6.8) 21.5 (6.3)
average age of farmers' daughters 18.3 (5.7) 18.9 (5.7) 20.1 (6.6) 18.6 (6.5)
Permanent involvement in farming
% family members concerned, at least 16 years old 60.6 [340] 60.7 [580] 56.4 [966] 49.6 [468] 56.7 [2354]
% females among total permanently involved members 56.3 [206] 55.7 [352] 53.4 [545] 61.2 [232] 55.8 [1335]
% farm heads concerned 75.7 [115] 68.3 [205] 67.1 [343] 55.0 [160] 66.2 [823]
% farm heads' wives concerned 95.6 [113] 94.4 [197] 87.2 [313] 91.4 [151] 91.1 [774]
% farm children concerned
% heads' sons concerned, over 16 years old 4.4 [67] 10.1 [139] 12.6 [222] 2.8 [106] 9.0 [534]
% heads' daughters concerned, over 16 years old 1.8 [56] 7.4 [68] 65 [107] 3.8 [78] 5.2 [309]
% farms with permanent participation of children in field
works
3.4 [119] 7.2 [207] 8.8 [340] 3.8 [159] 6.7 [825]
Involvement in off-farm activities
% farms with at least one member off-farming 97.5 [119] 95.7 [207] 93.8 [340] 91.2 [159] 94.3 [825]
% males concerned, over 16 year old 38.0 [171] 38.3 [324] 40.6 [540] 44.7 [253] 40.5 [1288]
% females concerned, over 16 year old 19.5 [169] 10.2 [256] 14.6 [426] 14.9 [215] 14.4 [1066]
% farm heads concerned 22.6 [115] 25.4 [205] 27.4 [343] 33.8 [160] 27.5 [823]
% farm heads' wives concerned 4.4 [113] 2.5 [197] 6.7 [313] 2.6 [151] 4.5 [774]
% holders' sons concerned, over 16 years old 69.6 [56] 61.5 [117] 61.9 [202] 61.7 [94] 62.7 [469]
% holders' daughters concerned, over 16 years old 58.1 [43] 40.4 [52] 42.9 [91] 44.3 [61] 45.3 [247]
Do Female-Led Farms Perform Less Well in Cotton Production? Insight from Hebei Province (China) 439
TABLE 2: COTTON CROPPING, COSTS AND RETURNS, COMPARISON BETWEEN MALE- AND FEMALE-LED FARMS
Note: Figures in brackets are total numbers; figures in square brackets are standard deviations. Comparisons are made between male- and
female-led farms * significant at 5%, ** significant at 1%, *** significant at less than 0.1%; Other costs pertain to soil preparation, sowing, weed
control by herbicides, growth regulation of cotton plants and occasional labour hiring.
TABLE 3: FACTORS AFFECTING YIELDS ON COTTON FARMS
Cotton cropping, costs, and returns All Farms Male-led farms Female-led farms
Number of farms 819 570 249
Total cultivated land (ha) 0.75 (0.54) 0.78 (0.62) 0.62 (0.39)**
Cultivated land per capita (ha) 0.26 (0.20) 0.28 (0.21) 0.23 (0.17)**
Cultivated land per capita, at least 16 years old (ha) 0.29 (0.23) 0.31 (0.24) 0.25 (0.19)**
Own land (ha) 0.61 (0.31) 0.62 (0.29) 0.51 (0.25)**
Own land per family member, at least 16 years old (ha) 0.24 (0.16) 0.25 (0.15) 0.21 (0.17)**
Land renting
% of farms concerned 29.4 [819] 29.2 [570] 29.6 [249]
average rented land (ha) 0.46 (0.71) 0.51 (0.81) 0.35 (0.44)*
Cotton area (ha) 0.44 (0.46) 0.49 (0.53) 0.36 (0.33)**
Cotton area per family member, of at least 16 year old (ha) 0.17 (0.17) 0.19 (0.19) 0.13 (0.12)**
Number of varieties cultivated 1.6 1.6 1.5
Percentage of farms with at least one non-Bt variety 31.1 [819] 33.2 [570] 26.5 [249]
Seed renewal, % of farms with systematic annual renewal 69.6 [806] 67.4 [530] 74.3 [276]
Seed source, % of farms with systematic purchase 83.0 [806] 81.8 [560] 85.8 [246]
Cotton yield, seedcotton (kg/ha) 3795 (840) 3735 (765) 3945 (945)**
Total cash-expenses production cost (US$/ha) 817 (181) 821 (190) 806 (152)
seed cost (US$/ha) 87 (58) 87 (59) 85 (52)
mulching plastic cost (US$/ha) 58 (23) 58 (23) 59 (21)
Irrigation cost (US$/ha) 54 (27) 56 (27) 50 (27)*
Fertilisation cost (US$/ha) 294 (106) 294 (110) 294 (92)
Pest control cost (US$/ha) 171 (79) 173 (79) 165 (75)
Disease control cost (US$/ha) 25 (33) 21 (25) 35 (42)**
Other costs (US$/ha) 127 (75) 131 (85) 121 (48)*
Total cotton production value (US$) 1178 (1120) 1270 (1214) 967 (832)**
production value per area (US$/ha) 2661 (754) 2596 (685) 2831 (875)**
production value per family member, at least 16 years old
(US$)
439 (417) 476 (451) 357 (312)**
Total cotton gross income (US$) 808 (774) 865 (836) 679 (592)**
Gross income per area (US$/ha) 1850 (792) 1175 (733) 2023 (886)**
Gross income per family member at least 16 years old (US$) 300 (287) 323 (311) 250 (217)**
Independent variales Value Std deviation t value Pr > t
Constant 3441,715 186,260 18,478 < 0,0001
Female-led farms 191,419 63,406 3,019 0,003
Help from children 331,142 114,373 2,895 0,004
Cotton area -12,528 4,432 -2,827 0,005
Number of varieties 96,063 40,142 2,393 0,017
Annual seed renewal 26,618 67,094 0,397 0,692
Seed sourcing from merchants -229,545 93,222 -2,462 0,014
Perception that diseases need to be controlled -7,179 105,288 -0,068 0,946
Seed cost -2,681 1,155 -2,321 0,021
Plastic mulching cost 3,714 2,610 1,423 0,155
Irrigation cost 8,590 2,062 4,166 < 0,0001
Fertilization cost -0,074 0,532 -0,139 0,890
Pest control cost -0,491 0,758 -0,647 0,518
Disease control cost 8,004 1,808 4,427 < 0,0001
Other costs 1,949 2,271 0,858 0,391
440 World Cotton Research Conference on Technologies for Prosperity
The better yield performance of female-led farms was confirmed by the multivariate regression
analysis (Table 3). The female-led farms have shown a positive effect on seed cotton yield. The positive
effect of assistance from the farm children was significant cotton being a labour intensive crop. The
number of varieties that farmers used had a positive impact on yield, contrary to seed costs and seed
provision from merchants. With regard to the costs of cultivation practices, only irrigation and disease
control exhibited positive effects.
DISCUSSION
The study covered cotton production in Hebei province a major cotton belt of China. Cotton is produced
on small farms where the average land holding is less than half a hectare (Fok et al., 2005; Pray et al.,
2001). China is probably the country where cotton farms are smallest. The results were obtained from
samples of farms whose representativeness was derived from the characteristics of the farm families.
Feminization was observed in cotton production where, females amounted for more than half of the
labour force in field work (55.8%) as females were essentially involved in farming (91.1%). These
figures are consistent with the empirical data analysed by Mao and Liu (2009) but lower than those of
Deng (2008), who carried out a large-scale survey and found that females accounted for 74.7% of the
field labour force in 2006. The differences observed might be due to variations between provinces.
Mainly wives of farm heads, who remained involved in farming were permanent workers in the fields,
apart from those who were engaged in off-farm activities on a long-term basis (about 30% of them).
It was found that about 31% of farms being led by females as their husbands were involved in off-
farm activities for more than five months a year. Our result was consistent with Deng (2008), who
observed in 2006 that 20.7% of farms were led by females alone, and even up to 31 to 33% in some
provinces.
The study confirmed the high frequency of farming family members involved in off-farm activities.
We found that 94.3% of farm families had at least one member engaged in off-farm activities. The figure
was higher than that found by Chen et al. (2010) where it was 74.3%. Further, it was found that
youngsters engaged in off-farm activities compare to farm heads.
Because of their lower involvement in off-farm activities, females were the permanent workers in the
fields, mainly wives of farm heads, but their husbands remained involved apart from those who were
engaged in off-farm activities on a long-term basis (about 30% of them). The smaller the size of the
farms, the higher was the frequency of farm heads involved in off-farm activities on a long-term basis,
and consequently the frequency of farms being run by females. The results confirm the relevance of
addressing the issue of the performance of female-led farms because these farms accounted for 30% of
all cotton farms in Hebei province. The relevance also derives from their structural differences with
reference to farms run by males. The female-led farms were smaller in size, indicating the probable
causality between farm size and long term migration of the farm heads. The smaller the farms are, the
more difficult it is to make ends meet without additional income from off-farm activities, thereby pushing
farms heads to engage for many months in off-farm activities, leaving their wives alone to run their
farms. This mechanism is indeed found by most of the studies addressing the feminization of agriculture
in China (Gao, 1994; He et al., 2010; Li and Fang, 1999; Zhou and Sun, 2006).
From a technical perspective, female-led farms did not perform less well because they achieved
higher yield. This result is contrary to what used to be claimed for developing countries (Lastarria-
Cornhiel, 2006) and feared in China (Li and Fang, 1999; Wu and Zhang, 2008) although they were
seldom based on empirical analyses. Our result is nevertheless close to the rare empirical studies in China
(de Brauw et al., 2008; Zhang et al., 2004), which did not find confirmation that female-led farms
performed less well. Li (2001) found in 1996 that the return on women's agricultural activities was higher
than that of men, probably a direct consequence of more involvement in field work by women. In the
study, female-led farms performed well because they entailed a similar level of total production costs,
and also because they probably took better care of their smaller cotton plots. Their capacity to invest in
Do Female-Led Farms Perform Less Well in Cotton Production? Insight from Hebei Province (China) 441
production costs was opposite to what used to be reported in other countries. We believe that this
difference arises from the involvement of their husbands in off-farm activities and the resulting income.
We found no evidence that women were less technically skilled, which was quite consistent with the
results of Song (1999). Our result was contrary to the productivity decrease that was feared to result from
the fact that women were less educated or was less familiar with techniques and farm management
according to Li and Fang (1999) but that was at the early stage of feminization and may no longer hold
now. Nevertheless, in economic terms, female-led farms performed less well because they were smaller.
Their gross income per unit area was better, as a consequence of higher yield and similar production
costs, but at farm level, this performance was mitigated by the smaller size of their cotton plots.
Female-led farms accounted for about 30% of cotton production in Hebei province. They were
smaller but technically they performed well. The higher yield they achieved was due to their capacity to
invest in production costs similarly to other farms probably the income earned from the off-farming
activities by the farm heads was also invested in the farming which resulted in better care of smaller
cotton farms.
REFERENCES
[1] Chen, F. and Xu, Y. (2008) - Social Exclusion and Feminization of Agriculture: A Case Study of Dongzhai Village in
Fujian Province. J. Henan Univ. 10(1): 3842.
[2] Chen, Y., Liu, Y.and Xu, K. (2010) - Characteristics and Mechanism of Agricultural Transformation in Typical Rural Areas
of Eastern China: A Case Study of Yucheng City, Shandong Province. Chinese Geographical Sci. 20(6): 545553.
[3] Cheng, C. (1998) - Empirical study of the feminisation of agriculture and rural female labour competences. J. Zhengzhou
Univ. 31(3): 8388.
[4] Chikwama, C. (2010) - The role of rural off-farm employment in agricultural development among farm households in low-
income countries: Evidence from Zimbabwe. AfJARE 4(1): 1109.
[5] Das Gupta, M. and Bhat, P.N.M. (1997) - Fertility Decline and Increased Manifestation of Sex Bias in India. Population
Studies 51: 307315.
[6] De Brauw, A., Li, Q., Liu, C., Rozelle, S. and Zhang, L. (2008) - Feminization of Agriculture in China? Myths Surrounding
Womens Participation in Farming. The China Quarterly 194: 327348.
[7] Deng, Z. (2008) - Feminisation of agriculture and women development. Xiang Tide Magazine 299: 57.
[8] Fok, M., Wang, J., Liang, W. and Xu, N. (2005) - Production cotonnire chinoise : forces et faiblesses d'une intgration et
d'une adaptation l'conomie de march. Cahiers Agricultures 15(1): 4253.
[9] Gao, X. (1994) - The current trend of farming labour change and agricultural feminization. Sociology Research 2: 8390.
[10] He, J., Li, X. and Zhang, M. (2010) - Household gender division of labor and the feminization of agriculture. J. Nanjing
Agricultural University 10(1): 5056.
[11] Lastarria-Cornhiel, S. (2006) - Feminization of Agriculture: Trends and Driving Forces. Rimisp-Latin American Center for
Rural Development, Santiago, Chile.
[12] Levine, N.E. (1987) - Differential Child Care in Three Tibetan Communities: Beyond Son Preference. Population and
Development Rev. 13: 281304.
[13] Li, S. (2001) - Rural Women: Employment and Income An Empirical Analysis Based on the Data from Sample
Villages. Social sciences in China 3: 5669.
[14] Li, X., and Fang, Z. (1999) - Discussing the impacts of feminization on the agricultural and rural development. Res.
Agricultural Modernisation 20(2): 8890.
[15] Mao, X. and Liu. Q. (2009) - Agriculture "feminisation" or "aging"? - Evidence from empirical data. Population Res.
33(2): 6980.
[16] Pray, C.E., Ma, D., Huang, J. and Qiao, F. (2001) - Impact of Bt cotton in China. World Development 29(5): 813825.
[17] Riley, N.E. (2004) - Chinas Population: New Trends and Challenges. Population Reference Bureau, 36 p.
[18] Song, Y. (1999) - Feminization of Maize Agricultural Production in Southwest China. Biotechnology and Development
Monitor 37: 69.
490
RESULTS A
For the le
weight L(
Upper len
analysis w
whole pop
The o
Lp.
m
1 2
2 2
3 2
4 2
5 2
6 1
7 1
8 2
9 1
10 2
11 2
12 2
13 2
14 2
15 2
The c
presented
Pa
In Fig
by weight
Lengthcon
points, wh
CONCLUSIO
There we
Lengthcon
parameter
have been
On th
correlation
Presen
competitiv
product o
make an a
ACKNOWLE
This
Developm
industry
Action 2.1
REFERENCE
[1] Breuer
[2] Breuer
Sales In
[3] Frydry
10 Nr 3
[4] Frydry
(in Poli
[5] Gniotek
FIBER
[6] Pabich
parame
[7] Trtzsc
German
[8] Wakely
g. 6., there is
t from the AF
ntrol are the
here the diffe
ON
ere compared
ntrol with ap
rs from the L
n compared.
he basis of m
n between L
nted results
ve method f
f machines s
additional op
EDGEMENT
work is (p
ment of rese
CLO 2IN
1.
ES
J., (2005), Len
J., (2005)a, Le
nfo.
ch I., Matusiak
3(39), 2002.
ch I., (2005),
ish).
k K.. Kuchars
RS & TEXTILE
A., Frydrych I
eters. TEXSCI 2
chler GmbH &
ny.
yn P.J., Chaudr
World Cot
Fig. 6: Th
s presented a
FIS and SFC
most correla
erences are s
d the results
ppropriate L(
Lengthcontro
easurement a
(w) from the
show that a
for the older
such as the c
peration to pr
partially) sup
earch infrast
N TEX, fin
ngthcontrol LCT
engthcontrol LC
k M, Trends of
Cotton asse
ska-Kot J. (200
ES in Eastern Eu
I., Raczyska M
2010. Liberec.
Co. KG, Moen
ry M.R. (2010),
tton Research C
he Values of SFC P
a graph with
C from the L
ated with the
een, the maj
s of two len
(w) and L(n)
ol. Additiona
and statistica
e AFIS and U
a new system
ones, espec
card, draw fr
repare specia
pported by
tructure of i
nanced by O
T Far more th
CT The decis
AFIS Applicat
essment system
04), Commensu
urope, Vol. 12.
M., Andrysiak J
nchengladbach
Cotton: Techn
Conference on T
Parameters from t
three sets of
Lengthcontrol
e results of S
ority of resu
ngth paramet
from the AF
aly, the SFC
al result anal
Upper length
m of measur
cially in the
rame or com
al samples fo
Structural
nnovative te
Operational
han just a fiber l
ive step toward
tion in Researc
ms and method
urability of M
No. 2 (46)
J., (2010). The
(2006), TC-LC
nology for the 2
Technologies fo
the Lengthcontrol
f points relat
l. There is sh
FC by numb
lts is almost
ters (Upper
FIS, which se
C parameters
lysis it can b
h from the Le
ring the fiber
case of inter
mbing machin
or the measur
Founds in
echniques an
Programme
length measurin
ds quality assur
h and Industry,
ds. Editor of t
Measuring Instru
Lengthcontrol
CT fiber length
1
st
Century, ICA
or Prosperity
and AFIS
ted to the SF
hown that th
ber from the
equal.
length and L
eemed to be
from the Le
e stated that
engthcontrol.
r length L
roperation co
ne is the sliv
rement of fib
the frame
nd technolog
Innovative
ng device, Trtz
rance and qualit
, Fibres &Texti
the Technical
uments for Tex
a comparativ
measuring dev
AC.
FC by numbe
he SFC result
AFIS. In spi
LCT length)
the most sim
engthcontrol
there is a str
Lengthcontro
ontrol, wher
ver, there is n
ber length par
of the pro
gies of textil
Economy, 2
zschler Sales In
ty optimization
iles for Eastern
University of
xtile Science a
ve analysis of c
vice, Operating
er and SFC
ts from the
ite of some
) from the
milar to the
and AFIS
rong linear
ol can be a
e the half-
no need to
rameters.
oject titled
le clothing
2007-2013,
nfo.
n, Trtzschler
n Europe vol.
Lodz, Lodz
and Practice,
cotton length
instructions,
+ A
,]
+ B
,k
+ E
,],k
(1)
Where: Y is the response variable
m
i
is the mean of the bale i
A is the random effect of the layer j in the bale i~ N(u, o
A
2
)
B
i, k :
is the effect of the block k in the bale i
E
i, j, k
is the error of measurement of the replicate k of the layer j of the bale i, residual effect linked to
the replicate in the layers ~ N(u, o
L
2
), independent from A
i is 1I bales
j is 1J layers in the bale
k is 1K replicates in each layer.
The two retained random effects retained as variability sources (A and E) are assumed to be
independent:
o
A
corresponds to the standard deviation of the random layer effect,
o
L
corresponds to the standard deviation of the residual effect.
504 World Cotton Research Conference on Technologies for Prosperity
Our goal is to evaluate o
A
and o
L
for each retained situation and to estimate the variance error as a
function of practical sampling (J sampled layers in a bale) and testing conditions (K tests per sample) or
N if one decides to mix cotton fibers from J layers to analyze them all together:
o
M
2
=
c
A
2
]i
+
c
E
2
]iKi
or respectively o
M
2
=
c
A
2
]i
+
c
E
2
Ni
(2)
The full paper exactly explaining the statistical theory of this experiment is published in Textile
Research Journal [1]. (3)
DEFINITION OF THE LITIGATION RISK AND CALCULATION MODALITIES
In this experiment, we made all steps necessary for evaluating the litigation risk that a given tolerance
(Table 2) is exceeded for each measured characteristic.
TABLE 2: TOLERANCES USED FOR CALCULATION OF THE LITIGATION RISK [16]
Characteristic Commercial tolerances
Micronaire +/- 0.1 unit
UHML +/- 0.508 mm
UI +/- 1 %
STR +/- 1.5 cN/tex
Rd +/- 1 %
+b (Yellowness) +/- 0.5 unit
For our numerical calculations, we chose a litigation risk of 10%, and the standard deviation of the
difference is the commercial tolerance divided by the quintile (100-5)% of the normal distribution =
1.65.
-1
(1-u)
=
-1
(0.95)
= 1.6S. The standard deviation of the mean of the bale is then:
o
M
=
1oI
(1.65.2)
(5)
Three ways of decreasing the sampling variances are
Increasing the number of replicates. Then J=1 and K>1. This is pertinent if the contribution of
the measurement error is larger than that of the between layer error.
Increasing the number of layers. Then J > 1 and K = 1. This is pertinent if the contributions of
the between layer and within layer variances are well balanced.
Increasing the number of layers and replicates that are parts of the combined sample without
increasing the total number of replicates. Then J>1 and N=1. This is pertinent when both
variances are comparable in level..
Bales from the ginning mills within the bold circle will show less than 10% litigation risk with 1
layer sampled and 1 replicate. Bales from the ginning mills within the dotted ellipses will show less than
10% litigation risk with J layers sampled and K replicates.
In practice, the number of layers J should be limited to two as it is only easy to remove samples of
fiber (cutter method) from the top and bottom outside layers of the bale. Then according to the position in
this chart, one can deduce the sampling and testing protocoles to e applied in the commercial
classification process.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
From results obtained on reference materials tested in the sets of samples, we did not observe any hour
effect or day of testing effect in the analysis, thus proving that external conditions did not affect the
technological measurements.
Fig.
Explorator
The cont
characteri
characteri
situations
could be i
that, the n
the situati
replicate.
layers sam
marked w
In all
cleaner in
ginning m
suspect a
right uppe
In the
situations
When
samples to
agreed tol
both Sigm
cotton ma
As in
Micronair
Yellowne
The Within B
1: Example of Rela
ry Analysis of
tribution of
istic concern
istic (Figure
are illustrate
included in t
number of la
ions inside t
Bales from
mpled and K
with arrows ar
cases, the e
ndicated som
machines wh
problem of s
er corner of t
e case of on
ensure a liti
n all data wi
o grab per b
lerances and
maA and Sigm
anagement fr
dicated in S
re and two
ss.
Bale Repeatabil
tionship Linking th
the Acquired
the factors
ned. To illu
2). That sho
ed by a point
the J=2 and
yers per bale
the bold circ
the situation
K=1 replica
re those show
effect of the
me variations
here the situa
seed cotton m
the Figure 2)
ne sample tak
gation risk lo
ill be availa
ale and the n
the lowest l
maE values
rom field to g
Sample testin
measuremen
lity of Standardi
he Standard Devia
Results
s layer an
ustrate these
ows the Sigm
t. Many poin
d N=J.K=1
e needs to be
cle showed
ns inside the
ate in the c
wn in the pre
crop season
s among the
ations with r
management
) we took our
ken from on
ower than 10
able for all c
number of te
litigation risk
are high and
gin, and of fi
ng, we rem
nts of Leng
zed Instruments
tion between Laye
nd replicate
e results, we
maA vs Sigm
nts are includ
1 ellipse tha
e increased i
less than 10
dotted ellips
omposite te
evious box pl
n (crop seaso
e situations.
roller gins w
t at the ginni
r fiber sampl
ne layer with
0% (those ins
characteristic
ests to be per
k as possible
d that some a
ibers from th
mind that one
gth/ Uniform
s for Testing Co
ers (SigmaA) vs. w
e differed
e display on
maE relation
ded in the J=
n in the J=
in the compo
0% litigation
se showed le
sting possib
lots.
on 1 or 2) an
There was
were often fa
ng mill at th
les and the sa
h one replica
side the limit
cs, we will
rformedper s
e. However,
adjustments
he gin stand t
e replicate co
mity Index, o
otton Fiber Prod
within Layer Stand
depending
ne example
nship for Mi
=1 and K=1
1 and K=2
osite testing p
n risk with 1
ess than 10%
bility. The tw
nd the prese
also a prob
ar from the o
he time (exam
aws in those
ate, we obse
t curve in bo
be able to d
sample in or
for some situ
will also be
to the pressed
orresponds t
of Strength,
duced in Africa
ard Deviation (Sig
on the tec
of the tec
icronaire wh
circle and m
ellipse. We
possibility. B
1 layer samp
% litigation ri
wo extreme
ence or absen
blem of diff
origin of the
mple of the p
gins.
erved that on
old).
deduce the n
rder to respec
uations, it ap
necessary in
d bale.
o one measu
of Color R
505
gmaE)
chnological
hnological
here the 65
more points
concluded
Bales from
pled and 1
isk with J
situations
nce of lint
ferences in
e chart, we
point in the
nly certain
number of
ct both the
ppears that
n the seed-
urement of
Rd and of
506 World Cotton Research Conference on Technologies for Prosperity
Fig. 2: Example of Micronaire: Standard Deviations between Layers (SigmaA) vs within Layer (SigmaE) for all Available Situations
Actual Limitations of the Study
In this study, we did not consider reproducibility conditions that could appear when results are
different from one classing laboratory to the next.
It will be also necessary to periodically quantify the within-bale variability for each situation in
order to ensure the litigation risk for any given situation.
Finally, we did limit the litigation risk to 10% for any single bale while commercial agreements
and contracts generally concern lots of several bales and the General Rules of Cotton
Associations; the lot litigation risk will have to be evaluated as well.
CONCLUSION
The measurement of within bale variability for six technological characteristics of cotton fibers produced
in fourteen cotton producing countries in Africa was done. Technological characterizations of these
samples were achieved in operating conditions that ensured the repeatability of the characterizations.
Within bale variance was categorized as sampling variance on one hand and as replicate variance on
the other. The goal is to propose sampling and testing procedures. Using the procedures proposed based
on African conditions; Africa will be able to start the instrumental classification of their cotton fibers
with a sampling and a testing procedure that respects international standards and with a low litigation
risk. This could also lead to improvements of seed cotton management and limit the risk of litigation. The
final aim is to give confidence in SITC results to final users in Africa as well as in any other place on
Earth.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The authors wish to thank the financial contributors who made this study possible. The study was
undertaken as part of project CFC/ICAC/33 Commercial Standardization of Instrument Testing of
Cotton, which was funded by the Common Fund for Commodities, an intergovernmental financial
institution established within the framework of the United Nations, headquartered in Amsterdam, the
The Within Bale Repeatability of Standardized Instruments for Testing Cotton Fiber Produced in Africa 507
Netherlands, and by the European Union in the framework of its "All ACP Agricultural Commodities
Programme under the sponsorship of the International Cotton Advisory Committee (ICAC) Washington
(USA) and implemented by the Faserinstitut Bremen (FIBRE), Germany.
The authors would like to thank the personnel of the Tanzania Bureau of Standards and Tanzania
Cotton Board Dar es Salaam, Tanzania on one side and the one from CERFITEX, Sgou, Mali who
performed all the fiber characterizations for the present study.
Finally, the authors want thank the African Cotton Companies who allowed us to take samples in
their facilities for running this experiment.
DISCLAIMER
This report was prepared within the project CFC/ICAC/33. The views expressed are not necessarily
shared by the Common Fund for Commodities and/or the European Commission and/or the International
Cotton Advisory Committee. The designation employed and the representation of material in this report
do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Common Fund for
Commodities and/or the European Commission or the International Cotton Advisory Committee
concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or its authorities, or concerning the
delineation of its frontier or boundaries.
REFERENCES
[1] Abo M, Gourlot J-P, Goz E, Hubl P And Sinoimeri A. New Findings On Within Bale Repeatability Of Standardized
Instruments For Testing Cotton Measurements On Cotton Fiber Produced In West And Central Africa. Textile Research
Journal (Under Press). 2011.
[2] Sasser Pe And Smith Cb. High Volume Instrument Test System A Tool For Textile Manufacturing. 1984.
[3] Sasser Pe And Moore Jf. A Historical Perspective Of High Volume Instrument Developments In The U. S. Itmf-Icctm.
Brme1992, P. 215.
[4] Knowlton J. International Developments In Cotton Classification. Beltwide Cotton Conferences. New Orleans, Usa:
National Cotton Council Of America, 2005, P. 22547.
[5] Icac-Secretariat. Instrument Testing Of Cotton At The Producer Level For Trading Purposes. Washington D.C., Usa2011.
[6] Thibodeaux Dp, Senter H And Cui X. Within Bale Variations Of Cotton Fiber Properties. Beltwide Cotton Conferences.
Nashville, Usa: National Cotton Council Of America, 2008, P. 1542.
[7] Levrat R. Culture Commerciale Et Dveloppement Rural, L'exemple Du Coton Au Nord-Cameroun Depuis 1950.
Paris2010, P.292 P.
[8] Levrat R. La Culture Du Coton Dans La Zone Franc. Paris, France2010, P.264 P.
[9] Davidonis Gh, Johnson A, Landivar Ja And Hood Kb. The Cotton Fiber Property Variability Continuum From Motes
Through Seeds. Textile Research Journal. 1999; 69: 7549.
[10] Davidonis Gh, Johnson As And Johnson Rm. Quantification Of Within-Plant And Within-Field Yield And Fiber
Variability. Crop Management. 2004; Http://Ddr.Nal.Usda.Gov/Bitstream/10113/11887/1/Ind43806179.Pdf.
[11] Clouvel P, Goz E, Sequeira R, Dusserre J And Crtenet M. Variability Of Cotton Fiber Quality. New Frontiers In Cotton
Research: Proceedings - Washington: Icac, 2000. 2000.
[12] Meyer V.G. And Meyer Jr. Some Sources Of Variability In Boll And Fiber Properties Of Cotton (Gossypium Hirsutum L.).
Crop Science. 1970; Vol. 10: Pp. 699702
[13] Dimitrova L. And Bozhinov M. Variability Of Cotton Fiber Properties Caused By Genotype And Some Environmental
Factors. Plant Science. 1988; Vol.25: N9: 2734.
[14] Gourlot J-P. Les Tendances Dans La Standardisation Du Coton Sur Le March Mondial. Rle Et Place De La Recherche
Pour Le Dveloppement Des Filires Cotonnires En volution En Afrique: Actes - Montpellier: Cirad, 2000. 2000,
P. 1136.
[15] Usda. Cotton Ginners Handbook. Agricultural Handbook N 503. Washington, D.C., Usa1977, P. 110.
[16] D5867 A. Standard Test Methods For Measurement Of Physical Properties Of Cotton Fibers By High Volume Instruments.
In: Materials Asfta, (Ed.). Annual Book Of Astm Standards. Philadelphia, Pa (Usa) 2005, P. 88693.
[17] Saporta G. Probabilit, Analyse Des Donnes Et Statistique. 2 dition Ed. 2006, P.P. 1542.
[18] Philippeau G. Thorie Des Plans D'exprience, Application L'agronomie. 1989: 205.
85
Fig. 1: M
Machine Sp
The moto
diameter o
pulley con
and 110 rp
The o
diameters
with frequ
oscillates
experimen
fulcrum o
fixed kniv
mm to sui
Procedure
Experime
beater fre
short fibre
have been
The f
coupled w
respective
shifted to
each varie
The s
speeds (16
are design
The t
manufactu
This set o
C in all
Table
3 & 4 sho
and AFIS
average o
conditions
Differen
Modified DR Gin [G-
pecifications
or that drives
of the step p
nnecting the
pm.
other motor,
of 6 and 4.5
uencies of 1
with 950 op
nt. The slidi
of the lever a
ves. The over
it the varietie
e
nts were con
equency in r
e content in
n considered
first experim
with roller s
ely in Table
the appropr
ety was proce
econd set of
60,130, &11
nated as S1, S
third and fin
urers recom
of tests was u
the four Tab
es 1 and 2 su
ow importan
S machines.
f three value
s of humidity
ntial Speed Sett
-Gear Box, W-Gear
s the roller ro
pulley varies
gear box is k
, which driv
5 inch. The b
1000 and 75
pm. This com
ng weights,
at a pre-dete
rlap width be
es processed
nducted with
relation to va
the resultan
in the optim
ment was con
speeds of 16
1 as well a
riate pulley f
essed thrice
f tests was co
10 rpm) usin
S2 & S3 in T
nal set of te
mmended spee
used as the c
bles.
ummarize res
nt fibre prope
Three tests w
es for each qu
y and temper
ting Facility for
r Wheel, P-Pul-Ley
otates with th
in steps of 7
kept at 6 inc
ves the beat
beater driver
50 opm. In
mbination wa
which exert
ermined posi
etween fixed
in the tests.
h the variable
arious chara
nt lint, incide
mization study
nducted with
60, 130, and
s Table 3. F
fixed on the
at each comb
onducted with
g another pu
Table 2 as we
est was con
ed of roller (
control while
sults of expe
erties of lint
were carried
uality param
rature (65 + 2
Roller and Beat
y R-Roller, M-Movin
he speed of
7.5, 6.0 and
ch. This pulle
ter assembly
r with a pulle
conventiona
as kept as the
t force on th
ition for mai
d knives and
e speed (VS)
acteristics of
ence of neps
y. The experi
h a constant
d 110 rpm.
For the reduc
motor shaft.
bination of ro
h the beater
ulley combin
ell as in Tabl
nducted on t
(95 rpm) and
e critically an
riments toge
processed in
d out for eac
meter was rec
2% RH & 27
ter in Gins for H
ng Knife, O-Beater
1420 rpm an
4.5 inch whi
ey drives the
y, is also fi
ey of 9 inch
al DR gin, r
e control for
he roller, we
intaining con
moving kniv
gin to determ
f seed cotton
s, seed coat f
iment was ca
t beater freq
The results
ced speeds o
In all exper
oller and bea
frequency of
nation for the
le 4.
the same gin
d oscillation
nalyzing the
ether with oth
n various tri
ch of the con
corded. All th
7 + 2
0 C
)
Higher Ginning R
r Shaft, F-Fixed Kn
nd is fitted w
ile the diame
e rollers with
itted with th
diameter thu
roller speed
r all the eight
ere kept at 3
nstant pressu
ves was varie
mine the opt
n being ginn
fragments, a
arried out in
quency of 1
are designa
of 130 & 11
riments, 10 k
ater speeds.
f 750 opm fo
e beater driv
nning mach
frequency (9
results. The
her performa
ials. Fibre te
ntrol and tre
he tests were
Rates
nife, and C-Conecti
with a step p
eter of the ro
h the speeds o
he step pull
us oscillates
is 95 rpm a
t cottons in t
30 inch away
ure between
ed between 9
timum roller
ned. The stap
and ginning p
the followin
000 opm su
ated as S1,
10 rpm the V
kg of seed co
or the same t
ve. Here too
hine operated
950 opm) of
data are des
ance data wh
ests were don
eated sample
e conducted a
525
ing Arm]
pulley. The
oller driver
of 160,130
ley having
the beater
and beater
the present
y from the
roller and
9 mm to 11
r speed and
ple length,
percentage
ng steps.
uccessively
S.2 & S3
V-belt was
otton from
three roller
the results
d with the
the beater.
signated as
hile Tables
ne on HVI
es, and the
at standard
526 World Cotton Research Conference on Technologies for Prosperity
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Influence of Machine Parameters on Lint Out-turn
Two important machine parameters that influence the ginning rate and lint quality in ginning are the
speed of the roller and the frequency of the oscillating beater. The effect of the roller speed and the beater
frequency on ginning rate (GOT) and related parameters will be clear from data in Tables 1 and 2.
TABLE 1: GINNING OUT-TURN AT DIFFERENT ROLLER SPEEDS WITH A BEATER FREQUENCY OF 1000 OPM
Variety Treatment Ginning Rate
Kg/hr
Lint Out- turn
Kg/hr
Ginning
(%)
% Increase in
Ginning Rate
% Increase in
Lint Out-turn
G Cot DHy 7 S1
S2
S3
C
180
180
180
105
72
72
72
40
33.7
33.8
33.6
34.0
71.0
71.0
71.0
-
80.0
80.0
80.0
-
K.2 SI
S2
S3
C
163
143
100
80
60
45
38
29
35.9
35.7
35.9
36.0
103.7
78.7
25.0
-
106.8
55.1
31.0
-
Jayadhar S1
S2
S3
C
254
171
240
150
82
60
73
51
31.8
31.6
31.8
32.0
69.3
14.0
60.0
-
60 .7
17.6
43.1
-
H.8 S1
S2
S3
C
170
189
160
98
60
69
52
35
35.0
35.8
35.8
35.0
73.4
92.8
63.3
-
71.4
97.1
48.5
-
JKHy.1 S1
S2
S3
C
200
138
137
103
65
53
53
37
35.4
35.5
35.4
35.6
94.1
33.1
33.0
-
75.6
43.2
43.2
-
G Cot 10 S1
S2
S3
C
160
100
112
96
58
36
41
36
32.6
32.4
32.8
33.0
66.7
4.1
16.6
-
61.1
0.0
13.8
-
DHB.105 S1
S2
S3
C
166
175
172
115
60
62
62
40
35.6
35.2
35.5
35.8
44.3
52.5
49.5
-
50.0
55.0
55.0
-
DCH.32 S1
S2
S3
C
220
151
167
85
72
58
53
30
33.3
33.2
33.5
33.5
158.8
77.6
96.4
-
140.0
76.6
93.0
-
Sl: 160:1000, S2: 130:1000, S3: 110:1000 and C: 95:950
TABLE 2: GINNING PERFORMANCE AT DIFFERENT ROLLER SPEEDS WITH A BEATER FREQUENCY OF 750 OPM
Cotton Treatment Ginning Rate
Kg/hr
Lint Out- turn
Kg/hr
Ginning
(%)
% Increase
In Ginning Rate
% Increase
in Lint
Out-turn
G Cot Hy.7
S1
S2
S3
C
145
140
120
105
57
56
48
40
33.7
33.9
33.6
34.0
38.0
33.3
14.3
-
42.5
40.0
20.0
-
K.2
SI
S2
S3
C
109
82
82
75
42
35
31
29
35.9
35.7
35.9
36.0
45.3
9.3
9.3
-
44.8
20,6
6.8
-
Jayadhar
S1
S2
S3
C
180
160
164
150
66
58
57
51
31.8
31.6
31.8
31.0
20.0
6.7
9.3
-
29.4
13.7
15.7
-
Table2(Contd.)
Differential Speed Setting Facility for Roller and Beater in Gins for Higher Ginning Rates 527
Table2Contd.
H.8
S1
S2
S3
C
120
116
113
98
46
45
45
35
35.0
35.8
35.8
35.0
22.4
18.4
15.3
-
31.4
28.5
28.5
-
JKHy.1
S1
S2
S3
C
130
100
100
90
52
41
41
38
35.4
35.5
35.4
35.6
44.4
11.1
11.1
-
36.8
7.8
7.8
-
G Cot 10 S1
S2
S3
C
113
105
105
96
40
37
38
36
35.6
35.4
33.8
33.0
17.7
9.4
9.4
-
111
2.8
5.5
-
DHB.105
S1
S2
S3
C
125
124
120
115
50
50
48
40
35.6
35.2
35.5
35.8
8.6
7.8
4.3
-
25.0
25.0
20.0
-
DCH.32
S1
S2
S3
C
150
150
120
83
48
48
46
30
33.3
33.2
33.5
33.5
80.7
80.7
44.6
60.0
60.0
53.3
TABLE 3: QUALITY PARAMETERS OF LINT AT DIFFERENT ROLLER SPEEDS WITH A BEATER FREQUENCY OF 1000 OPM
Cotton Treatment 2.5% Span
Length (mm)
Short Fibre
%
Mic (10-6g/in) Mat.
Ratio
Fibre Strength
g/tex
Neps/g SCF/g
G Cot DHy
7
S1
S2
S3
C
22.3
23.3
23.2
20.8
13.5
13.4
14.1
11.1
52
5.3
5.3
5.3
0.89
0.90
0.87
0.87
20.8
21.6
194
21.5
95
128
139
118
11
20
27
16
K.2 S1
S2
S3
C
24.4
24.2
22.6
23.8
20.0
19.7
18.3
15.2
4.3
4.2
4.2
4.0
0.79
0.83
0.79
0.77
20.8
20.4
22.5
21.6
261
250
280
243
48
55
40
44
Jayadhar S1
S2
S3
C
24.7
23.3
22.7
24.7
15.0
15.8
13.7
10.7
4.3
4.4
4.3
4.4
0.90
0.88
0.89
0.91
19.1
16.1
15.7
15.4
193
182
195
161
19
16
18
16
H.8 S1
S2
S3
C
25.5
25.3
24.7
25.8
14.1
13.7
15.0
10.3
4.4
4.4
4.5
4.5
0.79
0.94
0.89
0.86
22.5
20.8
22.5
22.8
156
115
92
91
17
11
15
12
JKHy.1 S1
S2
S3
C
28.2
26.1
25.6
25.5
15.6
18.5
10.9
12.7
3.8
3.6
3.7
3.7
0.80
0.79
0.78
0.86
23,7
21,6
23.6
23.6
185
192
157
144
24
31
17
26
G.Cot 10 S1
S2
S3
C
25.6
24.8
25.0
26,4
13.9
14.7
13.4
10.2
4.3
4.4
4.0
4.3
0.86
0.85
0.89
0.86
20.9
19.9
17.9
18.9
167
138
155
124
48
38
51
24
DHB.105 S1
S2
S3
C
28.8
27,4
27.0
27.9
9.9
13.4
16.6
10.0
2.9
3.2
3.3
3.4
0.87
0.80
0.87
0.78
23.5
21.6
19.9
20,8
185
170
175
159
22
23
21
15
DCH.32 S1
S2
S3
C
32.7
31.8
30.9
33.1
13.6
13.1
12.3
7.5
2.9
3.2
3.3
3.4
0.78
0.78
0.77
0.77
25.5
21.6
21.4
21.5
212
190
200
170
19
18
19
16
528 World Cotton Research Conference on Technologies for Prosperity
TABLE 4: QUALITY PARAMETERS OF LINT AT DIFFERENT ROLLER SPEEDS WITH A BEATER FREQUENCY OF 750/MIN
Cotton Treatment 2.5% Span
Length
(mm)
Short
Fibre %
Mic
(10-6g/in)
Mat.
ratio
Fibre
Strength
g/tex
Neps/g SCF/g
G Cot DHy.10 S1
S2
S3
C
22.8
22.7
23.2
20.8
7.8
13.5
11.1
11.1
5.0
4.9
5.5
5.3
0.93
0.91
0.94
0.97
21.0
21.0
21.6
21.5
121
147
165
118
14
19
30
16
K.2 S1
S2
S3
C
25.8
23.1
23.2
23.8
11.5
18.9
18.9
15.2
4.1
3.9
3.4
4.0.
0.87
0.78
0.78
0.79
22.4
19.2
19.9
21.6
205
305
410
243
35
50
50
44
Jayadhar S1
S2
S3
C
24.4
24.5
24.4
24.7
9.8
11.5
13.6
6.7
4.3
4.8
4.1
4.4
0,89
0.88
0.87
0.91
19.6
19.9
18.4
15.4
140
229
202
161
12
13
23
11
H.8 S1
S2
S3
C
24.0
25.2
25.3
25.8
16.9
15.2
12.7
10.3
3.4
4.1
4.3
4.5
0.79
0.84
0.84
0.86
18.3
22.9
20.8
22.8
135
137
138
91
35
15
17
12
JKHy.1 S1
S2
S3
C
27.3
24.5
26.4
25.5
13.6
17.9
10.6
14.4
3.3
3.2
3.2
3.7
0.79
0.75
0.81
0.86
24.8
24.7
24.4
23.6
196
259
326
144
42
38
48
26
G Cot 10 S1
S2
S3
C
25.2
23.7
23.6
26.4
14.8
13.6
16.9
12.4
3.5
3,2
3.0
4.0
0.80
0.78
0.82
0.86
23,7
25.2
22.4
18.9.
116
171
194
124
27
17
31
24
DHB.105 S1
S2
S3
C
27.7
28.3
27/6
27.9
12..9
12.1
14.7
10.0
3.1
2.7
2.6
3.4
0,75
0.75
0.75
0,78
21.5
24.8
22.9
20.8
179
164
200
159
30
21
41
15
DCH.32 S1
S2
S3
C
35.4
33.4
33,3
33.1
11.4
12.6
9.8
7.5
2.8
2.8
2.5
2.9
0,79
0.77
0.78
0.77
28.2
27.1
23.8
21.5
202
190
200
170
18
17
16
16
From Table 1 it will be clear that the ginning rate and the lint out-turn in almost all the experiments
with changed speed ratios are much higher than with the normal (control) speed of roller and beater.
Among the three roller speed ratios (S1-160: 1000, S2-130: 1000 & S3-110: 1000), the highest ratio
(160:1000) gave the maximum ginning rate in all the cottons. The maximum increase in ginning out-turn
for the longest staple cotton DCH.32 was observed to be 158.8%. The increase in the lint out-turn ranges
from 50% for DHB.105 to a maximum of 140% for DCH.32. The speed ratio of 130:1000 gave the
highest ginning out-turn for medium staple like G.Cot.DHy.7 (80%) followed by DHB.105 (55%)
Table 5 gives the increases in ginning rate and lint out-turn averaged for for all the eight cottons
tested.The averages are found to be the highest for a roller speed of 160 rpkm coupled with the beater
frequency of 1000 opm. The numerical difference between percentage increase in ginning rate and lint
out turn for a given variety is dictated by its ginning percentage.
TABLE 5: AVERAGE INCREASE IN THE GINNING RATE AND LINT OUT-TURN OVER THE CONTROL
Sr. No Speed Ratio % Increase in Ginning Rate % Increase in Lint Out-Turn
Experiment-1
1 S1 (160: 1000) 84.8 80
2 S2 (130:1000) 52.5 49.8
3 S3 (110:1000) 51.5 50.8
Experiment-2
1 S1 (160:750) 27.4 29.7
2 S2 (130:750) 20.3 22.5
3 S3 (110:750) 12.1 13.2
It is well known that for a given variety with an average staple length of say, 24 mm,, there would be
some fibres with a length of 30 mm. The tips of such fibres are most likely to be picked up and gripped
first. Other shorter fibres are entangled with them and are dragged forward near the ginning point along
with the seed and then get ginned. The different speeds have given different out-turns for cottons and the
reasons for the same are discussed.
Differential Speed Setting Facility for Roller and Beater in Gins for Higher Ginning Rates 529
The rollers employed in the conventional double roller gin are of 16.5 cm diameter rotating at a speed
of (n) 95 rpm such that the surface speed (V= n d/2) lies between 48 and 50 m/min. The beater
oscillates with a frequency of 950 opm. Since the beater oscillates symmetrically with respect to the edge
of the fixed knife, one half of the time is utilized for feeding seed-cotton and the other half is for ginning.
Since the beater frequency is 950 opm, during the feeding interval of 1/30 sec, the rollers move a distance
of 26 mm. If it is assumed that during the feeding interval, the probability of a fibre of average length
being picked up by the roller is p (0<p<1), the length L of the fibre picked and pulled would be 26p mm.
It may be noted that for efficient ginning the fibres must be fully drawn out so as to ensure firm grip
and this requires that the staple length of the cotton is equal to the parameter L. Thus it is clear that
probability p must be as high as possible for ginning cottons with nearly 24 mm staple length. To
improve the value of the parameter L it is suggested that the roller speeds may be increased if the staple
length is more than 26 mm.
One representative example will reveal how a roller speed of 160 rpm in combination with an
oscillation frequency of 1000 opm is better suited for extra long staple cottons like DCH.32. The surface
speed (V) of the roller is given by
V = . d /2
where w is the angular velocity and d the diameter of the roller. If n is the number of revolutions per
minute,
V=2.n.d/2.
If the roller has a diameter of 15 cm, and it rotates with 160 rpm,
V = 2 . 160. 15/2 =. 125.68 cm/sec.
Similarly for roller speeds of 130, 110 and 95 rpm, the corresponding surface speeds are 102.1, 96.4
and 74.6 cm/sec.
In the first set of experiments the beater frequency was kept at 1000/min, the time period (time per
oscillation) being given by
t = 0.06 sec.
Since the feeding time per gin cycle (t
f
) is half of this time t
t
f
=0.03 sec.
The total movement of the roller during the time t
f
is 125.6 x 0.03 =3.768cms =37.7mm. Similarly
for 130, 110 and 95 rpm of roller speeds the corresponding movement of the roller during the same time
would be 30.6, 25.9 and 22.3 mm. respectively.
The time needed by a fibre on a seed to be caught between the roller and the knife-edge is a statistical
parameter and can be taken as
p x t
f
where p stands for the probability factor.
At the roller speed of 160 rpm, the fibres of average length (p x .37.7 mm) are caught between the
roller and the knife-edge and for them ginning starts in the first cycle itself. Thus for ginning long and
extra long cottons the highest speed of 160 rpm is justified and is expected to yield higher lint out-turn
than by employing the lower speeds.
It may be noted that the experiments performed with a roller speed of 130 rpm always results in
higher yield for medium staple cottons where the staple length varies between 24 and 30 mm. It is thus
concluded that the higher speed has a positive impact on the probability factor.
530 World Cotton Research Conference on Technologies for Prosperity
Most of the Indian cottons are of medium staple category and for them a roller speed of 130 rpm
coupled with a beater frequency of 1000 opm is found to be optimum for high lint yield. The same
condition cannot be taken for long staple cottons. In such cases, even if the grip is strong enough to
prevent fibreslippage, the seed may fail to get ginned in the first cycle. Nevertheless, it will utilize
subsequent cycles to get ginned. This would mean that ginning will be delayed and the out-turn will be
lower.
The other experiment with the same roller speeds combined with the lower oscillation frequency of
the beater (750 opm) also gives comparatively higher output (Table 2) than in the control experiment
with higher beater frequency (1000 opm). In this case, the feeding rate of seed cotton is more but the
beater frequency is less, thereby decreasing the ginning rate.
CONCLUSION
The VS Gin is an excellent replacement for the conventional DR gin presently being employed in Indian
ginning industry. It has the flexibility to permit optimization of settings to increase the productivity for
all types of cotton, short, medium and long staples.
For efficient ginning of cotton, the fibre must be dragged toward the ginning point i.e. at the edge of
the fixed knife. This can be achieved by setting different roller speeds relative to staple length of cotton
under the ginning process. At the recommended speed for the roller, the oscillating beater separates the
seed from the fibre with minimum number of strokes, at the same time increasing the ginning out-turn
and preserving fibre length, which is the most important quality parameter of the lint. The following are
the salient features of the performance of the VS. Gin:
In most cottons the ginning out-turn has recorded increase, ranging from 60% to 100% over the
production possible with the old model gin.
The roller speed of 160 rpm combined with an oscillation frequency 1000 cycles per minute for
the beater is the best for ginning extra-long Indian cottons.
For medium staple cottons in the length range of 24-28 mm, a roller speed of 130 rpm in
combination with 1000 oscillations per minute for the beater is the most appropriate.
The combination of 110 rpm for the roller and 1000 cycles per minute for the beater is ideal for
the cottons having length 20 to 23 mm.
Important fibre parameters such as 2.5% span length, fibre tenacity and other characters are
preserved.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The authors are grateful to Dr. A. J. Shaikh, Director CIRCOT for according permission to present this
paper at WCRC-5.
REFERENCES
[1] Comparative Performance of Different Types of Gins, A report submitted by CTRL, ATIRA & AIFCOSPIN to IDA/IBRD,
Sponsored by NCDC, India (1984).
[2] Sundaram, V., "Contribution of Cotton Technological Research Laboratory to the Improvement of Cotton Ginning in
India", CTRL Publication, New Series, No. 144 (1980).
[3] Chaudhary, M Rafiq, "Harvesting and Ginning of Cotton in the World", Proceedings of Beltwide Cotton Conferences,
Vol.2 of 2 pp 1617-1619 (1997).
[4] Johnson, F., Mayfield, W., Lalor, W. F. and Hughes, S. F. "Ginning Developments", Textile Asia, 23(10), 49-52(1992).
[5] Vizia, N.C. and Iyer K.R.K.; "Ginning Research in India and Future Prospects", National Seminar, Mumbai (1999)..
[6] Nanjundayya, C. and Iyengar, R. L. N., A Resume of Various Investigations Carried Out on the Ginning Of Indian
Cottons, Tech. Bull. Series, B No.50, Tech. Laboratory, Matunga, Bombay (Oct 1955).
[7] Gillium, M. W. and Armojo, C.B., American Society for Agriculture Engineers, Vol.43 (4) 809-817 (2000).
[8] Chellamani, K.P. Parthasarathy, N. and Jaikumar, V., "Design and Development of High Production Gin and Lint Cleaner",
Asian textile Journal, (June 2000).
1
Australian Upland base grade quality is staple length > 1.130 inch, strength > 29 g/tex and Micronaire in the range of 3.5-4.9.
ELS base grade quality is staple length > 1.350 inch, strength > 44 g/tex and Micronaire in the range of 3.5-4.1.
546
Variety
Upland
ELS
3
Avera
The a
with y-er
treatments
fibre.How
the fibre, w
In the
21 kGy, w
in fibre str
In the
reducing b
each subs
strength c
did increa
decrease i
The e
graphicall
age of 5 Tests
average resul
rror bars of
s by either M
wever gamm
with these ef
e case of Upl
with the fibre
rength was a
e case of the E
by almost 5
sequent radia
corresponded
ase at a dos
in elongation
xtent of the
ly illustrated
World Cot
TA
Nep
lts after the
one standar
MB or ET ha
ma irradiation
ffects becom
and cotton, t
e strength sig
a gradual, but
ELS cotton,
g/tex (11%)
ation dosage
d with a grad
sage of 21
n with a dosa
decrease in f
in Figures 1
F
Fig
tton Research C
ABLE 3: NEP, SEED-CO
s/ gram
326
167
various qua
rd deviation
ad little or no
n, even at the
ming more ap
the strength o
gnificantly re
t significant
the strength
from 44.5 g
e, the fibre s
dual but signi
and 74 kGy
age of 29 kGy
fibre strength
and 2.
ig. 1: Effect of Qua
g. 2: Effect of Quar
Conference on T
OAT NEP AND SFC RES
rantine treat
n, giving an
o significant
e lower dosa
parent and si
of the fibre r
educing with
decrease in f
was affected
g/tex to 39.4
strength was
ificant decrea
y. Notwithst
y and 57 kGy
h and elonga
rantine Treatment
rantine Treatment
Technologies fo
SULTS BY THE AFIS PR
SCN/ gram
21
10
tments are sh
n indication
t effect on th
ages, has an e
ignificant as
reduced signi
h each dosage
fibre elongat
d more signif
g/tex after g
s significantl
ase in fibre e
anding this
y.
ation due to t
ts on Fibre Streng
ts on Fibre Elongat
or Prosperity
RO
3
hown in Fig
of the varia
he physical p
effect on the
the dosage s
ificantly afte
e. Correspon
tion with eac
ficantly than
gamma irradi
ly affected.
elongation, a
anomaly, th
the various q
gth
tion
SFC(w)%
8.9
2.9
gures 1 to 3,
ation. The f
properties of
e physical pr
strength incr
er gamma irra
nding with th
ch dosage.
n for the Upla
iation of 21
This decreas
although the
here was a
quarantine tre
%
expressed
fumigation
f the cotton
operties of
eased.
adiation of
he decrease
and cotton,
kGy. With
se in fibre
elongation
significant
eatments is
For b
were not
short fibr
subsequen
determine
decrease
decreasing
There
colour de
Spotted G
on the co
irradiation
The e
Figure 3.
STRUCTUR
In order t
irradiation
weight de
As ca
fibres wer
2
The propor
Th
both the Upla
affected by
re index (S
nt higher do
ed by the AF
at the 29 kG
g from 86%
e was a slight
eteriorated fr
Good Middlin
olour of the
n did not seem
extent of the
AL ANALYSIS
o determine
n, the sampl
etermination.
an be seen by
re found betw
rtion by mass o
e Effect of Qua
and and EL
gamma irrad
FI)
2
increas
osages. This
FIS PRO. Th
Gy dosage,
to 83% with
t impact on t
from Good M
ng (13~3) co
e cotton as
m to make a
increase in S
Fig.
OF IRRADIATE
the reason f
les were ana
y the SEM im
ween the untr
of fibres shorter
rantine Treatme
S cotton, M
diation. Fibr
sed significa
s trend was
his in turn als
with Upland
h subsequent
the colour of
Middling W
otton as the g
Pima cotton
any differenc
SFI due to th
3: Effect of Quara
ED COTTON SA
for the signif
alysed by a
mages shown
reated and tr
r than one half i
ents on the Phy
Micronaire, m
re length wa
antly at the
also noted
so had an ef
d cotton dec
higher dosag
f the Upland
White (11~3)
gamma irrad
n is naturall
e to the colo
he various qu
ntine Treatments
AMPLES
ficant change
range of tec
n in Figure 4
reated sample
inch, measured
sical Properties
maturity, fibre
as also not si
29 kGy d
in the shor
ffect on lengt
creasing from
ges.
d cotton, altho
to Good M
diation dosag
ly creamier
ur.
uarantine trea
on Short Fibre Ind
es in the phy
chniques inc
, no significa
es.
by the HVI.
s of Cotton Fibre
e fineness a
ignificantly
dosage, grad
rt fibre cont
th uniformity
m 82 to 80%
ough the effe
Middling Lig
ges increased
than Uplan
atments is gr
dex %
ysical fibre p
cluding SEM
ant differenc
es
and nep cont
affected; how
dually increa
tent %, by w
y which also
% and the E
fect was mini
ght Spotted
d. There was
nd cotton an
raphically ill
properties aft
M, and SEC
ces to the sur
547
tent values
wever, the
asing with
weight, as
o tended to
ELS cotton
imal as the
(12~1) to
no impact
nd gamma
lustrated in
fter gamma
molecular
rface of the
548
DETERMINA
The estim
cotton, wh
These
Upland co
parameter
actual rea
lines from
irradiation
progressiv
apparent M
irradiation
cellulose
fibrillar st
the more
the observ
data, sam
irradiation
fibres is n
Fig. 4: Represent
ATION OF CELL
mated Molecu
hile the Upla
Fig. 5
e MW corres
otton. This di
rs have never
ason for the o
m their origin
n doses were
ve than that
MW of all ce
n dose of 74
chains at the
tructures, wh
crystalline d
ved alteration
mples from w
n doses com
not significan
World Cot
tative SEM Images
LULOSE MOLEC
ular weight (
and cotton ex
5: Estimated Molec
spond to a de
ifference ma
r been repor
observed dif
nal value (10
e accompanie
observed be
ellulose samp
kGy. These
e most sensi
hile higher d
domains of th
n of the mec
wood have b
mpared to the
ntly modified
tton Research C
of Untreated (Lef
CULAR WEIGH
(MW) of the
xhibited a sig
cular Weight of Ce
egree of poly
ay reflect gen
rted to affect
fferences rem
0
6
or 7 x 10
5
ed by a conti
etween the n
ples decreas
results sugg
tive points p
doses are req
he fibres. Th
chanical prop
been shown
e untreated s
d upon irradia
Conference on T
ft) and 74 kGy Irra
T
e non irradia
gnificantly lo
ellulose from Untre
ymerization
netic variatio
the MW of
mains unclea
Da) to ca 2.
inued decrea
non irradiate
ed from 2.5
gest that a 21
probably rep
quired to furt
he decrease i
perties of th
to exhibit a
samples, wh
ation (Aoki e
Technologies fo
adiated (Right) Cot
ated cellulose
ower apparen
eated and Gamma
(DP) of ca 6
on or differen
cellulose fro
ar. The obser
5 - 3 x 10
5
D
se in MW, b
ed samples a
- 3 x 10
5
Da
kGy irradiat
resenting do
ther decrease
in molecular
e cotton fibr
a decreased m
hile the degre
et al. 1977).
or Prosperity
tton: Top Upland; B
e samples w
nt MW (7 x 1
Irradiated Cotton
6200 for the
nt growth con
om different
rved apparen
Da under a d
but the observ
and those exp
a to 10
5
Da w
tion dose pro
omains of low
e the size of
size is most
res upon irra
molecular w
ee of crystal
Bottom ELS Cotton
was 10
6
Da fo
10
5
Da) (Figu
n Fibre
ELS and 43
nditions, alth
cotton lines
nt MW dropp
dose of 21 kG
ved decrease
posed to 21
when exposed
ovokes the b
wer crystalli
f cellulose ch
t likely respo
adiation. Sim
weight upon
llinity of the
n
or the ELS
ure 5).
300 for the
hough such
. Thus, the
ped for all
Gy. Higher
e was more
kGy. The
d to a total
breakage of
inity in the
hains from
onsible for
milar to our
increasing
e cellulose
TEXTILE PE
Moisture R
Figure 6 s
fumigatio
ELS cotto
decreasing
change.
Dyeing
Figure 7 s
shade and
decreases
Th
ERFORMANCE
Regain
shows the mo
n with either
on fibre. Irrad
g as the dos
shows a pho
d hence dye
and hence th
F
e Effect of Qua
oisture regain
r MB or ET
diation with
sage increase
Fig. 6: Moisture R
otograph of th
e uptake is
he shade of t
Fig. 7: Dye Uptake o
rantine Treatme
n of the untr
has a signif
a 21 kGy do
es to 57 kG
Regain of Upland a
he untreated
clearly visib
the samples d
of Untreated and T
ents on the Phy
reated and tre
ficant effect
osage gives s
Gy, after whi
nd ELS Cotton Fibr
d and treated
ble. As the
decrease.
Treated Cotton Fib
sical Properties
eated fibre sa
on the moist
similar result
ich the mois
re at Various Quar
fibre sampl
irradiation
bre at Various Qua
s of Cotton Fibre
amples. It is
ture regain o
ts with the m
sture regain
rantine Treatment
les after dyei
dosages inc
arantine Treatmen
es
interesting t
of both the U
moisture rega
does not sig
ts
ing. The diff
crease, the d
nts
549
to note that
Upland and
ain steadily
gnificantly
ferences in
dye uptake
550
Each
Each sam
were mea
Difference
difference
values ne
significan
Yarn Resul
There wer
treated fib
the irradi
elongation
The y
NT cotton
with an ir
into fabric
the yarn s
strength r
impossibl
74 kGy.
sample was
mple was me
asured using
es between
e from the u
ear or greate
nt on the basi
lts
re no signific
bre samples.
ation dosage
n results.
yarn strength
n and the 21
rradiation do
c by the wea
strength dec
reduced to
e. The yarn
World Cot
then put in t
asured 5 tim
g the CIELA
the samples
untreated fibr
er than one
is of the mon
TABLE 4: FIBRE
Upla
N
M
E
2
2
5
74
EL
N
M
E
2
2
5
74
cant differen
However, a
e strength in
h, for both th
kGy irradia
osage of 29 k
aving and als
reased even
18.7cN/tex,
strength was
tton Research C
the viewport
mes and the r
AB colour s
s were asses
re samples a
between th
nochromatic n
E APPEARANCE REPORT
and L*
NT 49.0
MB -4.3
T -2.2
1 -3.3
9 1.2
7 1.7
4 5.74
LS L*
NT 48.1
MB 1.3
T -1.2
1 4.52
9 3.7
7 7.4
4 7.8
nces in the ev
as can be see
ncreases, wi
he Upland an
ted cotton. H
kGy, which w
so the knittin
further to b
which wou
s further redu
Fig. 8: Yarn Stren
Conference on T
of a Gretag
readings ave
scale, using
ssed in term
and takes in
he untreated
nature of the
TED IN LIGHTNESS (L),
* a*
05 54.19
34 -0.47
20 -0.61
38 -3.97
7 -3.86
7 -4.85
4 -7.71
* a*
10 52.51
5 0.36
27 1.23
2 -1.75
1 -3.36
6 -5.95
8 -7.83
venness and
en in Figure
ith the resul
nd ELS cotto
However, the
would make
ng processes
below 10 cN
uld make p
uced to 14.8
ngth of Untreated a
Technologies fo
Macbeth Co
eraged. The
L (lightnes
ms of delta E
nto account d
and treated
e dyed sampl
, REDNESS (A), BLUEN
b*
20.16
0.26
-0.53
-4.05
-4.55
-5.13
-6.95
b*
20.08
-3.17
1.68
-3.17
-3.59
-6.09
-7.04
imperfection
8, the yarn
lts typically
on yarns, did
ere was a sig
e the Upland
. With an irr
N/tex. In the
processing o
cN/tex with
and Treated Cotto
or Prosperity
olor Eye 7000
appearance
ss), a (redne
E (E), whi
differences i
d samples w
les.
ESS (B), AND E
E
0
2.0
1.07
2.9
2.7
3.2
5.1
E
0
0.78
1.13
2.8
2.8
5.1
5.8
n values betw
strength sign
following t
d not reduce
gnificant redu
d cotton yarn
radiation dos
case of the
f fabric on
h irradiation d
n
0A spectroph
of dyed fibr
ess) and b (
ich it the to
n L, a and b
were deemed
ween the unt
nificantly de
the fibre str
significantly
uction in yar
n impossible
sage of 57 an
e ELS cotton
high speed
dosages of 5
hotometer.
re samples
(blueness).
otal colour
b. Delta E
d as being
treated and
ecreases as
rength and
y from the
rn strength
to process
nd 74 kGy
n, the yarn
d weaving
7 kGy and
As ca
elongation
between N
reduction
case of th
and a dos
to 3.7%).
Fabric Res
As can be
increases,
following
irradiation
strength w
although s
The a
that abras
6000 rubs
CONCLUSIO
The fumig
on the phy
have an e
Th
an be seen in
n. As was th
NT, Upland
in yarn elon
he Upland co
age of 74 kG
In the case o
sults
e seen in Fig
indicating
the yarn str
n dosage. Fo
with a dosage
significant, th
abrasion resis
sion resistanc
s as compare
ON
gation treatm
ysical proper
effect on the
e Effect of Qua
n Figure 9, th
e case with t
and ELS cot
ngation betwe
otton, the yar
Gy almost re
of the ELS co
F
gure 10, the
that the fab
rength result
or both the
e of 21 kGy.
he reduction
Fig. 10: Fab
stance was d
ce of both th
d to NT cotto
ments by eith
rties of the c
e physical pr
rantine Treatme
his decrease
the yarn stren
tton and the
een NT Upla
rn elongation
educed the ya
otton, the yar
Fig. 9: Yarn Elonga
fabric burst
bric strength
ts in Figure
Upland and
. The fabric
n in strength w
bric Bursting Stre
determined on
he Upland an
on failing at
her ethylene
otton fibre. H
roperties of
ents on the Phy
in yarn stren
ngth, there w
21 kGy irrad
and and ELS
n at 57 kGy w
arn elongatio
rn elongation
ation of Untreated
ting strength
decreases a
1. Fabrics b
d ELS cotto
strength con
was not as la
ength of the Untrea
nly for NT a
nd ELS cotto
~ 50 000 rub
oxide or me
However gam
the fibre, wi
sical Properties
ngth coincid
was no signif
diated cotton
cotton and t
was similar t
on by half w
n continued t
and Treated Cotto
significantly
as the irradi
became sign
on, there wa
ntinues to dec
arge as betwe
ated (NT) and Trea
and 74 kGy i
on was signi
bs.
ethyl bromid
mma irradiat
ith these eff
s of Cotton Fibre
ded with a gr
ficant differe
n. There was
the 29 kGy i
to the results
when compar
to steadily dr
on
y decreases
iation dosag
nificantly we
as a significa
crease with t
een the NT a
ated Cotton
irradiated fab
ficantly affe
de had little o
tion, even at
fects becomi
es
radual decrea
ence in yarn
s however a
rradiated cot
s of the 29 k
ed to NT cot
rop with each
as the dosag
es increases
eaker with ea
ant decrease
the higher do
and the 21 kG
brics. The re
cted, both fa
or no signifi
the lower do
ing more app
551
ase in yarn
elongation
significant
tton. In the
Gy dosage
tton (6.6%
h dosage.
ge strength
s, typically
ach higher
e in fabric
osages but,
Gy dosage.
sults show
ailing at 5-
cant effect
osages, did
parent and
552 World Cotton Research Conference on Technologies for Prosperity
significant as the dosage strength increased. Our results show that the physical fibre properties of the
cotton such as; strength, elongation, length uniformity, short fibre and to a lesser extent length and colour
are affected by gamma irradiation. Moisture regain and dye uptake were also significantly affected. In
addition, there were differences between the Upland and ELS cotton varieties. Analysis by various
microscopy methods revealed no noticeable surface damage. However, the apparent molecular weight of
the cellulose present in cotton fibre decreased even at low gamma irradiation dosage (21 kGy),
irrespective of variety. The decrease in molecular size is in all likelihood responsible for the changes in
the physical properties of the cotton fibers upon irradiation.
From a textile processing performance point of view, yarn results show that the various irradiation
dosages did not have a significant impact on the evenness and imperfection values. However, gamma
irradiation had a significant effect on the yarn strength and elongation results of both the Upland and ELS
cotton, with the results typically following the fibre strength and elongation results. The fabric results
also show that gamma irradiation does have a significant effect on fabric strength and abrasion resistance
for both the Upland and ELS cotton, with the results typically following the yarn strength results.
The salient message from this study is that if any cotton lint needs to be treated by quarantine one
must insist on chemical (fumigation) by either ethylene oxide or methyl bromide as gamma irradiation,
even at low dosages, severely damages the physical properties of cotton lint. These physical damages can
cause major issues if the cotton lint is to be used to either calibrate fibre testing instruments, to
benchmark various cottons or for commercial processing.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support of the Cotton Research and Development
Corporation and CSIRO Materials Science and Engineering. They also acknowledge the assistance of
Jeff Church, Colin Veitch and Bernadette Lipson in compiling this report. The support of Steritech and
the Auscott Classing facility is also acknowledged. The authors also acknowledge the assistance of Fred
Horne, Mark Freijah, Phil Henry, Lisa O Brien, Peter Herwig and Colin Brackley for processing the
fibre through to fabric as well as Susan Miller and Liz Coles for testing the samples.
REFERENCES
[1] Aoki, T., Norimoto, M. and Yamada. T., (1977) Some Physical Properties of Wood and Cellulose Irradiated with Gamma
Rays. Wood Res. 62, pg 1928F.
[2] Berhold, F., Gustavsson, K., Berggren, R., Sjholm, E. and Lindstrm, M., (2004) Dissolution of Softwood Kraft Pulps by
Direct derivatization in Lithium Chloride/ N, N-Dimetylacetamide. J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 94: 424431
[3] Evtuguin, D.V. Tomas, J.L. Silva, A.M.S and Neto, C.P. (2003) Characterization of an acetylated heteroxylane from
Eucalyptus globulus Labill. Carbohydr. Res. 338: 597604.
[4] Lord, E., (1956) Airflow through plugs of textile fibres. Part II. The Micronaire Test of Cotton. J. Text. Inst.
47: T16 T47
[5] International Cotton Advisory Committee, (2010) Cotton: World Statistics.
[6] Van Der Sluijs, M.H.J, Long, R. and Gordon, S., (2009) An Alternative Miniature Cotton Spinning System, Beltwide
Cotton Conference, pg 14461452
ther
A& B and
ples, there is
cronnaire and
e depends m
n clearly obs
maturity are
559
d (0.08) for
s not much
d we dont
more on the
served that
controlled
560 World Cotton Research Conference on Technologies for Prosperity
CONCLUSION
The True Maturity measurement obtained from PREMIER ART 2 are traceable to image analysis
based maturity values measured at internationally recognized FASER INSTITUT located at
Bremen, Germany. The Repeatability of True Maturity measurement verified and is within the
acceptable limit.
Cotton with similar Micronaire,which are produced from different growing regions and seed
varieties/ hybrids have varying dye uptake mainly due to the differences in Maturity of the fibre.
Such Maturity variations reflected clearly in True Maturity values measured by the instrument.
Knitted Samples produced from different maturity values show clearly the dye uptake
differences. Such differences correlate well with the True Maturity values provided by the ART 2
Fibre testing instrument and also, the low stress mechanical properties measured in
KAWABATA evaluation system clearly correlates well with the True Maturity values of those
samples.
Yarn spun from high matured cotton can be preferred to produce wrinkle free fabric and
garments, as is evident from the low stress mechanical properties.
It is essential for a Spinning Mill, to control and maintain the maturity of cotton in each lay down
to control shade variations in the finished fabric apart from micronaire.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Thanks are due to Mr.M.Sampath Kumaar, Research Assistant, CIRCOT, Coimbatore, for evaluating the
fibre properties in ART-2 instrument.
REFERENCES
[1] Gulati, A.N., and Ahmad, N., J.Text. Inst., 26, T26191935)
[2] Gulati, A.N., Indian Text. J., 60,65,140(1949)
[3] Smith, B., Text.Res.J., 61, 137 (1991)
[4] IS 236-1968: Determination of CottonFibre Maturity ( by sodium hydroxide swelling method) ISI Hand book of Textile
Testing, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, 1982 Edn., P.86
[5] ASTM Designation: D 144293. Standard Test Method for Maturity of Cotton Fibres (Sodium hydroxide Swelling and
Polarized Light Procedures) 1998 Annual Book of ASTM standards, Vol.07.01., p 377.
[6] BS 30851968: Determination of Cotton Fibre Maturity (Estimation by Classifications of Fibres swollen in Sodium
hydroxide Solution), BS Handbook, No.11, Methods of Tests for Textiles, British Standards Institution, London, 1974
Edn.,p.2/44.
[7] Schwarz, E.R. and Hotte, G.H., Text. Res. J., 5, 370(1935)
[8] Schwarz, E.R., and Shapiro, L., Rayon Textile Monthly, 19, 371, 421, 480, 570(1938)
[9] Thibodeaux, D.P and evans, J.P., Cotton fibre Maturity by Image Analysis, Textile Res.J., 56, 130139, 1986
[10] Xu, B., Pourdeyhimi, B. and Sobus, J., Fibre cross-sectional shape Analysis Using Imaging Techniques, Textile Research
Journal, 63, 717730,1993
[11] Xu, B. and Ting, Y., Fibre Image Analysis, Part I: Fibre Image Enhancement, J. of Textile Institute, 87, 274283, 1996.