Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 30 views

    Request For Judicial Notice in Support of Nvidia Corporation'S Motion To Lift Stay and For Partial Summary Judgment

    Uploaded by

    sabatino
    Nvidia Corporation requests that the court take judicial notice of 9 documents in support of its motion to lift a stay and for partial summary judgment against Rambus Inc. in a patent infringement case. The documents include court opinions, trial exhibits, transcripts, patent abstracts, and prosecution file wrappers from a related case of Micron v. Rambus in the District of Delaware. Nvidia argues the documents are judicially noticeable under the Federal Rules of Evidence as they are published patents and records from another federal court case.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd

    Request For Judicial Notice in Support of Nvidia Corporation'S Motion To Lift Stay and For Partial Summary Judgment

    Uploaded by

    sabatino
    30 views3 pages
    Nvidia Corporation requests that the court take judicial notice of 9 documents in support of its motion to lift a stay and for partial summary judgment against Rambus Inc. in a patent infringement case. The documents include court opinions, trial exhibits, transcripts, patent abstracts, and prosecution file wrappers from a related case of Micron v. Rambus in the District of Delaware. Nvidia argues the documents are judicially noticeable under the Federal Rules of Evidence as they are published patents and records from another federal court case.

    Original Title

    86

    Copyright

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Nvidia Corporation requests that the court take judicial notice of 9 documents in support of its motion to lift a stay and for partial summary judgment against Rambus Inc. in a patent infringement case. The documents include court opinions, trial exhibits, transcripts, patent abstracts, and prosecution file wrappers from a related case of Micron v. Rambus in the District of Delaware. Nvidia argues the documents are judicially noticeable under the Federal Rules of Evidence as they are published patents and records from another federal court case.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    30 views3 pages

    Request For Judicial Notice in Support of Nvidia Corporation'S Motion To Lift Stay and For Partial Summary Judgment

    Uploaded by

    sabatino
    Nvidia Corporation requests that the court take judicial notice of 9 documents in support of its motion to lift a stay and for partial summary judgment against Rambus Inc. in a patent infringement case. The documents include court opinions, trial exhibits, transcripts, patent abstracts, and prosecution file wrappers from a related case of Micron v. Rambus in the District of Delaware. Nvidia argues the documents are judicially noticeable under the Federal Rules of Evidence as they are published patents and records from another federal court case.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    You are on page 1of 3

    Case 3:08-cv-03343-SI Document 86 Filed 02/06/2009 Page 1 of 3

    1 I. NEEL CHATTERJEE (STATE BAR NO. 173985)


    nchatterjee@orrick.com
    2 DEBORAH E. FISHMAN (STATE BAR NO. 197584)
    dfishman@orrick.com
    3 ROBERT W. RICKETSON
    rricketson@orrick.com
    4 ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP
    1000 Marsh Road
    5 Menlo Park, CA 94025
    Telephone: +1-650-614-7400
    6 Facsimile: +1-650-614-7401
    7 Attorneys for Defendant
    NVIDIA Corporation
    8

    9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

    10 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

    11 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

    12

    13 RAMBUS, INC., Case No.: C-08-03343


    (Consolidated with Case No.: C-08-5500)
    14 Plaintiff,

    15 v. REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE


    IN SUPPORT OF NVIDIA
    16 NVIDIA CORPORATION, CORPORATION’S MOTION TO
    LIFT STAY AND FOR PARTIAL
    17 Defendant. SUMMARY JUDGMENT
    18 Date: March 13, 2009
    Time: 9:00 a.m.
    19 Judge: The Hon. Susan Illston
    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    27

    28
    JUDICIAL NOTICE RE NVIDIA’S
    MOTION TO DISMISS
    C-08-03343
    Case 3:08-cv-03343-SI Document 86 Filed 02/06/2009 Page 2 of 3

    1 Defendant NVIDIA Corporation (“NVIDIA”) hereby respectfully requests that the Court
    2 take judicial notice of the documents listed below, copies of which are attached hereto.
    3 Defendant NVIDIA makes this request in support of its Motion to Dismiss the First Amended
    4 Complaint filed herewith.
    5 Pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 201, a court may take judicial notice of published
    6 patents. See Pepitone v. American Standard, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 30867, at *7 n.1 (Fed. Cir.
    7 1992) (taking judicial notice of published patents). A court also may take judicial notice of
    8 documents filed in other federal district court actions. See Shaw v. Hahn, 56 F.3d 1128, 1129 n.
    9 1 (9th Cir. 1995) (taking judicial notice of court records as part of a issue preclusion inquiry).
    10 1. Judge Sue L. Robinson’s Opinion in Micron v. Rambus, Civ. No. 00-792-SLR,
    11 (D. Del. 2009). A true and correct copy of this document is attached as Exhibit 1.
    12 2. Judge Sue L. Robinson’s Order from in Micron v. Rambus, Civ. No. 00-792-SLR
    13 (D. Del. 2009). A true and correct copy of this document is attached as Exhibit 2.
    14 3. Trial Exhibits introduced in Micron v. Rambus, Civ. No. 00-792-SLR (D. Del.
    15 2009): MTX 270, 279, 385, 493. and 601. True and correct copies of these documents are
    16 attached as Exhibit 3.
    17 4. Trial transcript excerpts from Micron v. Rambus, Civ. No. 00-792-SLR (D. Del.
    18 2009). A true and correct copy of this document is attached as Exhibit 4.
    19 5. Abstracts of each of the patents at issue in Micron v. Rambus, Civ. No. 00-792-
    20 SLR (D. Del. 2009). A true and correct copy of this document is attached as Exhibit 5.
    21 6. Hearing transcript dated January 16, 2009 from Micron v. Rambus. Civ. No. 00-
    22 792-SLR (D. Del. 2009). A true and correct copy of this document is attached as Exhibit 6.
    23 7. Order Entering Stay of Proceedings in Case Nos. C-05-00334, C-05-02298 and C-
    24 06-00244 dated February 3, 2009. A true and correct copy of this document is attached as
    25 Exhibit 7.
    26 8. Order Denying Hynix’s Motion for Summary Judgment of Unclean Hands in
    27 Hynix v. Rambus, Civil Action No. C-00-20905-RMW (N.D. Cal.) dated February 3, 2009. A
    28 true and correct copy of this document is attached as Exhibit 8.
    JUDICIAL NOTICE RE NVIDIA’S
    -1- MOTION TO DISMISS
    C-08-03343
    Case 3:08-cv-03343-SI Document 86 Filed 02/06/2009 Page 3 of 3

    1 9. Declaration and Power of Attorney filed prosecution file wrapper for U.S. Patent
    2 No. 6,591,353. A true and correct copy of this document is attached as Exhibit 9.
    3 Dated: February 6, 2009 ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP
    4
    /s/ Robert W. Ricketson /s/
    5 ROBERT W. RICKETSON
    Attorneys for Defendant
    6 NVIDIA CORPORATION
    7

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    27

    28
    JUDICIAL NOTICE RE NVIDIA’S
    -2- MOTION TO DISMISS
    C-08-03343

    You might also like