A Retrospective of The Event 27jan
A Retrospective of The Event 27jan
A Retrospective of The Event 27jan
A RETROSPECTIVE
Table of Contents:
1. Introduction
Introduction
The roundtable included participants from a diverse set of stakeholders. They were; Raj Liberhan,
Director, India Habitat Centre; Arunava Das Gupta, Founder Member, Institute of Urban Designers
(India); K.T. Ravindran, President, Institute of Urban Designers (India); Ashok B. Lall, Former Dean, TVB
School of Habitat Studies; Rajat Ray, Dean, Sushant School of Art and Architecture; Vikash Chandra,
Manager (Tourism), IL&FS; J.K. Dadoo, Secretary, Environment, Forest and Wildlife, Govt of NCT and
Chairperson, Delhi Pollution Control Committee; Sanjeev Sanyal, Founder, The Sustainable Planet
Institute; and S. Badrinarayanan, Architect.
Liberhan’s brief introduction of UHF and Das Gupta’s overview of the role of urban design were followed
by presentations on urban design by Ravindran, Ray, Lall and Sanyal.
Liberhan, in his opening comments, pointed out the secondary consideration received by the design
dimension in urban planning. According to him, “Design was never a conscious primary consideration in
the way the cities were being planned. It was always a by-product, landing second or third on the
(planners) list”, despite the fact that it is “…the most important and significant dimension of city
planning”.
Further detailing Liberhan’s contention, Das Gupta stressed the need for a paradigm shift in planning to
establish qualitative benchmarks for cities as opposed to sole concern with quantitative targets. He
argued that, until now, urban planners have made the error of looking at cities as “a numbers problem,
rather than a qualitative problem”.
The crux of the urban dilemma today, according to him, is the transformation of ‘city spaces’ to ‘city
places’; a transition in which urban design can play a decisive role. With this, Das Gupta put forth the
theme of the roundtable; “Can urban design play a critical and positive role in…converting urban spaces
into destinations and places for people?”
Ravindran’s presentation, ‘Design in the City: The Case Study of Delhi’, provided a historical and
contemporary view of the City. Interspersed with little-known Delhi trivia, the presentation began by
tracing the origins of the city. Taking the communication and road
I do not think we have a better networks during the Harappan period as a starting point, Ravindran
example of hit-and-miss in wove the story of Delhi through different eras from an urban
terms of design, than Delhi.
designer’s point of view.
K.T. Ravindran, President,
Institute of Urban Designers
The core of his argument was that “…the structure of the City, still
has embedded inside it the memories of very old developments”.
These connectivities, between the old and the new, have been, “progressively obscured by mindless
development”, that refuses to recognise them. However, these connectivities, “which arose as a
response to natural features” can help one decipher the organic growth of the City of Delhi.
Ravindran concluded his presentation by suggesting that urban design, instead of creating large plans,
leads the development of the City by bringing together “compactness, mixed use, and liveability”.
Taking up from that, Ray dissected the planning “disasters” of present-day Gurgaon in his presentation
‘Lack of Urban Design: The Case Study of Gurgaon’. Using an eclectic mix of satellite images, he
demonstrated the design flaws in the city that effect and change a citizen’s way of life in the area. At
the core of Ray’s presentation was the claim that Gurgaon is a city without a sense of space, design, and
sensitivity because of the way it has been planned.
Moving on from classical design flaws, the post-break session saw Lall’s and Sanyal’s presentations
detailing the interaction between urban design and sustainability. While Lall’s presentation, ‘Design and
the Urban Environment: Towards Greater Sustainability’ dealt with the macro picture, Sanyal’s
presentation, ‘Walkability: A New Urban Paradigm’ advocated a shift in policy-making assumptions to
ensure a sustainable cities.
Engaging the metaphor of nature, Lall equated the city to a forest. Clearings in a forest represent the
exclusive enclaves of different segments of citizens, while the connecting space between them, the open
area where these different segments interact, had been characterised as a “hazardous wilderness”. The
City, according to Lall, is experienced in this wilderness; an experience which for most is very
discomforting and installs a fear of the city in its inhabitants. Lall visualises this as a vicious cycle, which
needs to be broken. It is at this node that the role of urban design becomes crucial.
In conclusion, the Roundtable highlighted crucial flaws in urban planning in India, and deliberated on
solutions that the disciple of urban design could offer. The presentations employed various case studies
and metaphors to demonstrate the importance of urban design in addressing these flaws, and as a
consequence contemporary urban concerns.