Global Issues: Challenges of Globalization Week 1
Global Issues: Challenges of Globalization Week 1
Global Issues: Challenges of Globalization Week 1
Core understanding of international relations is the view of power struggle among countries
State-centric model emphasizes that states as the dominant, almost exclusive actor in world politics
Core Principles
How can a group such as two or more nations serve its collective interests when doing so requires its members to forego their individual interests?
Example: Problem of global warming. Solving it can only be achieved by many countries acting together. The problem of how to provide something that benefits all members of a group regardless of what each member contributes to it
Core Principles
In general, collective goods are easier to provide in small groups than large ones.
Small group: defection (free riding) is harder to conceal and has a greater impact on the overall collective good, and is easier to punish.
No central authority such as a world government to enforce on individual nations the necessary measures to provide for the common good
Core Principles
Three basic principles offer possible solutions for this core problem of getting individuals to cooperate for the common good without a central authority to make them do so.
Dominance
Solves the collective goods problem by establishing a power hierarchy in which those at the top control those below
Status hierarchy
Forces members of a group to contribute to the common good Minimizes open conflict within the group Stability comes at a cost of constant oppression of, and resentment by, the lower-ranking members of the status hierarchy. Conflicts over position can sometimes harm the groups stability and well-being.
Reciprocity
Solves the collective goods problem by rewarding behavior that contributes to the group and punishing behavior that pursues self-interest at the cost of the group
Easy to understand and can be enforced without any central authority Positive and negative reciprocity Disadvantage: It can lead to a downward spiral as each side punishes what it believes to be the negative acts of the other.
Generally people overestimate their own good intentions and underestimate those of opponents or rivals.
Identity
Identity principle does not rely on selfinterest. Members of an identity community care about the interests of others in the community enough to sacrifice their own interests to benefit others.
In IR, identity communities play important roles in overcoming difficult collective goods problems.
IR as a Field of Study
Practical discipline Theoretical debates are fundamental, but unresolved. IR is about international politics, but the field is interdisciplinary: relates to economics, history, sociology, and others
Issue areas: global trade, the environment, etc. Conflict and cooperation mix in relationships among nations Subfields
Usually taught within political science classes Domestic politics of foreign countries, although overlapping with IR, generally make up the separate field of comparative politics.
Principal actors in IR are the worlds governments. IR scholars traditionally study the decisions and actions of those governments, in relation to other governments. Individual actors: Leaders and citizens, bureaucratic agencies in foreign ministries, multinational corporations, and terrorist groups
Global issues tackle the new period in international relations or post-international politics Global issues indicates how globalization intertwines many aspects of human activities and how essential it is to adopt an interdisciplinary approach in order to understand our world and its impact in our lives
State Actors
Most important actors in IR are states. State: A territorial entity controlled by a government and inhabited by a population.
State government exercises sovereignty over its territory. Recognized as sovereign by other states Population forms a civil society; group identity Seat of government with a leader head of government or head of state
State Actors
Set of relationships among the worlds states, structured according to certain rules and patterns of interaction. Modern international system has existed for less than 500 years. Nation-states Major source of conflict: Frequent mismatch between perceived nations and actual borders. Populations vary dramatically. Great variation in terms of the size of states total annual economic activity
Great powers
Figure 1.1
State Actors
Taiwan: operates independently but claimed by China Formal colonies and possessions: Puerto Rico (U.S), Bermuda (British), Martinique (French), French Guiana, the Netherlands Antilles (Dutch), the Falkland Islands (British), and Guam (U.S.) Hong Kong (reverted from British to Chinese rule) The Vatican (Holy See) ambiguous status
Including various such territorial entities with states brings the world total to about 200 state or quasi-state actors. Other would-be states:
Kurdistan (Iraq), Abkhazia (Georgia), and Somaliland (Somalia) may fully control the territory they claim but are not internationally recognized
Nonstate Actors
Examples: OPEC, WTO, African Union, UN Vary in size from a few states to the whole UN membership
Nonstate Actors
Multinational corporations
Companies that span multiple countries Exist within one country but either influence that countrys foreign policy or operate internationally, or both Example: State of Ohio (entirely a U.S. entity) operates an International Trade Division
Substate actors
Table 1.2
Levels of Analysis
Response: IR scholars sorted out the influences, actors, and processes, and categorize them into different levels of analysis
Perspective on IR based on a set of similar actors or processes that suggests possible explanations to why questions Individual, domestic (state or societal), interstate, global levels of analysis
No correct level for a given why question. Levels of analysis help suggest multiple explanations and approaches to consider in trying to explain an event.
War in Iraq
Table 1.3
Periods of globalization
First wave of globalization is as old as human civilization Second wave of globalization is associated with the European conquest of Asia, Latin America and Africa Third wave of globalization which began in 1870 and declined around 1914 was marked by breakthrough in technological developments, global production of primary commodities and mass migration; 1914-1945 Fourth wave of globalization was from 1945 to 1980 spurred by retreat of nationalism and protectionism and the strengthening of internationalism and global cooperation, led by U.S. Fifth wave of globalization is the current period characterized by unprecedented interdependence among nations and the powerful nonstate actors
Causes of Globalization
Natural desire of man Revolutions in transportation Financial market integration Advances in military and medical technology
Forms of globalization
Economic and trade globalization Financial globalization Political globalization Military globalization Cultural globalization
Resistance to globalization
Globalization
3.
Globalization as the fruition of liberal economic principles/global marketplace Perspective characterized by skepticism: Worlds major economies are more integrated today than before WWI. North-South divide increasing with globalization; distinct and rival regional blocs; fragmenting of larger units into smaller ones Globalization as more profound than the skeptics believe, yet more uncertain than the view of supporters of liberal economics.
Globalization is changing both international security and IPE, but IPE more quickly and profoundly.
Figure 1.2
Table 1.5
Myths/Debates(?) globalization
(1) Downward pressure on wages
- a more significant factor is technology
(4) Openness to globalization will, on its own, deliver economic growth - Integrating with the global economy is, as economists like to say, a necessary, but not sufficient, condition for economic growth. (5) The shrinking state -Technologies that facilitate communication and commerce have curbed the power of some despots throughout the world, but in a globalized world governments take on new importance in one critical respect, namely, setting, and enforcing, rules with respect to contracts and property rights.