Nano and Micro PTFE for Surface Lubrication of Carbon Fabric Reinforced Polyethersulphone Composites

Jayashree Bijwe and Mohit Sharma Abstract Carbon bre/fabric (CF) is a privileged reinforcement for advanced polymer composites in tribological applications where performance is primary criteria rather than the cost due to the combination of distinct properties such as high specic strength, thermo-oxidative resistance, thermal and electrical conductivity along with self-lubricity etc. However problems associated with its chemical inertness and surface lipophobicity towards majority of matrix materials need special attention, as these directly affect nal properties of a composite. From tribological point of view, surface engineering of composites is very much advantageous in addition to brous reinforcement. This chapter reports on the newly developed technique to modify the surface of carbon fabricPolyethersulphone (CF-PES) composite with Polytetrauoroethylene (PTFE) micro and nano particles; to improve the tribological properties. Prior to the composite preparation plasma treatment was employed for CF surface modication to promote ber matrix interfacial adhesion and mechanical interlocking which further improves nal composites strength and wear resistance properties. Both the treatment methods; rst for ber surface alteration and secondly for composite surface, proved benecial to enhance composites performance. The inclusion of nano scale PTFE particles on the surface of a composite proved to be more efcient than the micro-scale PTFE particles to improve tribo-performance of CF-PES composite.

J. Bijwe (*) Industrial Tribology Machine Dynamics and Maintenance Engineering Centre (ITMMEC), Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi, Hauz Khas, New Delhi 110016, India e-mail: jbijwe@gmail.com M. Sharma Leibniz-Institut fr Polymerforschung Dresden, e.V. Hohe Strasse 6, 01069 Dresden, Germany e-mail: mohittiet@gmail.com J. Paulo Davim (ed.), Tribology of Nanocomposites, Materials Forming, Machining and Tribology, DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-33882-3_2, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013 19

20

J. Bijwe and M. Sharma

1Introduction 1.1 Fabric Reinforced Polymer Composites

For most applications virgin polymers are not the right choices mainly because of poor strength properties. Reinforcements for polymers, in various forms such as particulates, spheres (hollow, solid etc.) and brous (short, long, woven, nonwoven etc.) are preferred depending on prerequisite application. Each reinforcement form has its own advantages and limitations. Short bers, for example offer easy injection moldability for thermoplastic polymer composites. The strength offered, however, is moderate and depends on ber alignment with respect to the loading direction. Long bers on the other hand offer very high strength, but only in one direction and that too at the cost of easy processability. These are generally processed by compression molding and hence ber handling is a tough job. Fabric reinforcement on the other hand offers very high strength in two directions along with easier processability compared to the composites with long bers. For tribo materials, most popular brous reinforcements consists of glass, carbon, graphite, Aramid etc. Again each has its own advantages and limitations. Glass bers are least expensive and offer moderate strength and wear resistance (WR) at the cost of increased coefcient of friction (); damage the counterface, by abrasion generally and are used in combination with solid lubricants (SLs). Aramid bers are of moderate cost, offer considerable WR resistance and strength without excessive incremental in the value, neither damages the counterface. However, their temperature resistance is poor. On the other hand Carbon/graphite bers are most expensive with excellent; specic strength, thermal conductivity and self-lubricity properties.

1.2 Solid Lubricants for Improving Tribological Performance

For tribological applications, advanced polymer composites are preferably used with bers/fabric reinforcements along with SLs. SLs have lower surface energy and offer less resistance to shearing and hence low values. For tribological purpose the most popular SLs are PTFE, graphite, white graphite (hexa boron nitride/hBN), MoS2 etc. [1, 2].

1.3 Need for Surface Tailoring of Composites

While designing the high performance tribo-composite (e.g. dry bearing) which can survive under harsh operating conditions; matrix, llers and reinforcement are selected very judiciously. Such specialty polymers and reinforcements are

Nano and Micro PTFE for Surface Lubrication

21

Fig.1Schematic surface designing of Polymer Composites

essential but generally expensive. Since tribological composites need high performing surfaces from friction and wear point of view, use of these expensive materials in the bulk is not essential always. SLs being low surface energy materials if added in the bulk of composite, improves tribo-performance at the cost of signicant deterioration in the strength apart from unnecessary increase in the cost. It will be wise use the SLs only on surface rather than in the bulk or implement the concept of graded composites in which surface, subsurface and bulk are tailored judiciously with various matrices and reinforcements in such a way that the desired performance can be achieved with adequate cost. (For dry bearings, surfaces should have very low , low wear, high thermal conductivity, low expansion and high counter face friendliness, fatigue resistance while bulk should have desired mechanical strength and high thermal conductivity). Interestingly no such efforts are reported in open literature though peripheral information is available in few patent forms [3, 4]. Figure1 shows the schematic to signpost the judicious importance of each constituent for surface designed advanced polymeric composites which nally attributes to enhanced tribological performance. A little is reported on the exploration of concept of surface engineering of polymeric bearings [5]. Bijwe et al. [5] prepared surface-tailored composites based on commingled yarns of carbon ber and Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) using autoclave method. The composites were surface modied with micro sized particles of graphite, MoS2, copper and PTFE either in isolation or in combination in different proportions in the top fabric layers rather than their inclusion in the bulk. PTFE in various forms, such as particulate (micron sized), wool, short bers, long bers, etc., was used to investigate benets endowed by the surface modications. Among all SLs PTFE proved

22

J. Bijwe and M. Sharma

most promising. The long PTFE bers on the surface proved most benecial as compared to other forms to improve tribological performance of composites without appreciable loss in the strength. PTFE ber inclusion removed the stickslip problem associated with the unmodied surface; reduced from 0.6 to 0.12 and enhanced the WR approximately by 70 times. The placement of SLs however, was done manually and proper technique was not evolved in these preliminary studies.

1.4 Nano-Fillers for Tribo-Performance Enhancement and Involved Mechanisms

Development of polymeric nano-composites is the most sought research area from last decade due to the multi-fold potential of nano llers as performance enhancers when added in small doses [513]. The prominent features of nano-llers are; 1. Nano-particles (NPs) have a very high surface area to volume ratio and hence provide very large interfacial surface area, as a driving force for enhanced interaction with other surface, diffusion, especially at elevated temperature etc. 2. A very low content (generally <23wt %) provides exceptional increase in mechanical strength properties apart from thermal, electrical and biological. During the wear process, NPs are removed from the surface of a matrix and can act as a third body element in the contacting regions. The rolling effect of the NPs, especially at the edge of exposed bers, reduce the shear stress in the contact region and hence the [14]. This leads to the spontaneous reduction of grooving/cutting wear by the hard counterpart asperities and smoothening of topography of a surface of a composite. It also protects the bers adhering to the matrix and results in increased ber thinning rather than breaking before nal removal of bers from the matrix [68, 15]. The rolling effect of NPs attributes to the reduction in and hence the frictional heating at the tribo couple. The rolling effect is also observed in the case of micro particulate inclusions, for which the small particles tend to tumble through contact region and larger particles plough through it [5, 15]. There is a critical value of the size of a particle governing their transition from rolling to ploughing. To achieve the rolling, the ratio of maximum particle dimension to the minimum gap of contacting bodies must exceed the critical value which depends on the particle itself [16]. The hard micro sized particles and llers may abrade the counterface. This prevents the formation of a protective transfer lm, which increase the counter face roughness and hence the of the composite [17]. The NPs have the potential to reduce the abrasion that leads to these cascading and problematic events NPs (<100nm) are of the same size as the counterface asperities and polish the tallest asperities and promote the development of transfer lms. The transfer lms shield the composite from direct asperity contact and damage [14]. This lm converts the adhesive wear to like on like sliding pairs and hence the severity of wear reduces drastically [7, 18].

Nano and Micro PTFE for Surface Lubrication Fig.2Fiber architecture of 22 twill weave carbon fabric [20]

23

The quantication of advantages in tribology due to variation in size of llers (nano-sub-micro, micro etc.) is essential. Unfortunately it is not addressed in the literature and needs to be investigated in details. Recently authors have reported on such efforts using PTFE as a solid lubricant for surface modication, Polyethersulphone (PES) as a matrix and carbon fabric (surface treated and untreated) as a reinforcement [19] and the essence of the ndings are reported in the subsequent sections.

2 Materials and Methodology 2.1 Details of Selected Materials and Methods

2.1.1Reinforcement The carbon fabric (CF) 3K, 22 twill weave (Fig.2) was used as reinforcement and was procured from Fiber Glast Corporation, USA. 2.1.2 Matrix Material Thermoplastic Polyethersulphone (PES) Veradel 3600P procured from Solvay Advanced Polymer India was selected as a matrix material for development of composites. PES is an amorphous, amber colored, transparent, high performance, heat-resistant and semi tough engineering thermoplastic polymer having density

24

J. Bijwe and M. Sharma

Fig.3FESEM micrographs of selected PTFE particles [19, 20]

1.37g/cm3. It has a good thermal stability and high continuous use temperature (up to 200C). PES has a glass transition temperature (Tg) of 215C and a melting temperature (Tm) range of 300380C. It has high hydrolytic stability as compared to the other transparent thermoplastics polymers. 2.1.3 Selection of a Solid Lubricant: Polytetrauoroethylene PTFE is a white colored thermoplastic crystalline polymer with a density of 2.2g/cm3. Its Tg and Tm are 20 and 321C; respectively. Due to the robust nature of molecular bonds in its structure; PTFE is highly resistive to UV radiation and most of the chemicals except alkali metals and elemental uorine. It retains these properties over a very wide range of temperatures. For surface modication of composites, three sizes of PTFE (micro- 400450nm, sub-micro- 200250nm and nano- 5080nm) as conrmed from FESEM studies (Fig.3) were selected.

2.2 Surface Treatment of Carbon Fabric

2.2.1 Cold Remote Nitrogen Oxygen Plasma Generally bers are not always compatible with the polymer matrices and are provided with various types of sizing by the supplier to enhance their wettability with the selected matrices. Carbon bers are known for their inertness towards the matrices leading to less performing composite and hence require special attention after procuring from the supplier. Various CF surface treatments; such as acid, plasma, rare earth, gamma treatment are reported successfully in the literature with varying benets [2124] and newer and more effective methods are continuously being tried by researchers. Classical plasma treatment is a well-proven technique for improving adhesion between ber and matrix. Its improvisation for enhancing effectiveness is one of the most sought research areas. In this regards, cold remote nitrogen plasma (CRNP) treatment with 0.5% oxygen is a modied process and recently proved

Nano and Micro PTFE for Surface Lubrication

25

Fig.4Schematic of fabrication of CF-PES composites using compression molding [20]

to be successful [22]. The carbon fabric modied with this Cold Remote Nitrogen Oxygen Plasma (CRNOP) technique this was used for reinforcement. Unmodied CF was also selected to quantify the benets due to surface modication of fabric. (The work involves two surface modications; rst that of bers and second that of surface of a composite with PTFE.)

2.3 Development of Composites

2.3.1 Selection of a Processing Technique Solution impregnation technique was selected since it leads to homogenous distribution of a matrix throughout the prepregs including cross-over points in the weave which results the best performance of the composites. Figure4 shows the schematic for fabrication of composites [20]. Twenty pieces of CF plies (28 28cm) were cut from the roll were immersed in the solution of PES in dichloromethane (DCM) (20wt %) for twelve hrs in a properly sealed steel container. The prepregs were taken out carefully avoiding the misalignment of the weave and dried in an oven for an hour at 100C in a stretched condition and were stacked in a steel mold. PTFE coated glass fabric was placed on the top and bottom of the stacked prepregs as a mold release agent. The mold was then heated in

26

J. Bijwe and M. Sharma

a compression molding machine to a temperature of 380390C for 20min under a pressure of 7.3MPa. The composites were then cooled in a compressed condition and then cut with the help of diamond cutter for different mechanical (as per ASTM standards) and tribological characterizations. This composite was treated as a composite with unmodied surface. Two such composites were developed containing CF with and without CRNOP treatment. 2.3.2 Novel Technique for Surface Modication of Composites A modied impregnation method was used to develop surface tailored composites with PTFE of different sizes. The surface designing was done for only top two layers. PES and PTFE powders in a selected composition (2wt % of PTFE in PES) were mixed in a high shear ball mill using zirconia balls in an alcohol media for 16h. Batches prepared with all PTFE powders were dried in vacuum oven for 2h. The dried mix was then probe sonicated in an ethyl alcohol medium for 20min to achieve more homogeneous mixing and de-agglomeration of NPs. The solution impregnation technique (discussed in Sect. 2.3.1) was then used to prepare two prepregs for the surface. The sequence of applying temperature and pressure was optimized (temperature from 280 to 380C in the steps of 20C and pressure in the steps of 1MPa up to 6MPa). At higher applied temperature and pressure, matrix bleeding and displacement of bers were observed. Hence, the two tailored prepregs with eighteen untailored prepregs were compression molded under optimized conditions followed by natural cooling under compressed state to the ambient temperature.

3 Characterization of Carbon Fibers 

Various surface characterization techniques were adopted to analyze the effect of plasma treatment on the CF surface.

3.1 Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscopy

The surfaces of bers prior and after treatment were examined by Field emission Scanning Electron Microscopy (FESEM). Figure5 shows the FESEM images of untreated and plasma treated bers indicating the increased perforations and roughness of the ber due to the treatment, which was responsible for better ber-matrix mechanical interlocking and hence enhanced adhesion. High resolution FESEM micrographs in Fig.5b indicate deeper and narrower ridges along the length of the treated bers. In the process of composite manufacturing during

Nano and Micro PTFE for Surface Lubrication

27

Fig.5High resolution FESEM (Mag. 150K) micrographs of a carbon ber a before treatment b after plasma treatment [19, 20]

Fig.6ATR-FTIR spectra of untreated and plasma treated CF [22]

compression molding, groves on the ber surface acts as duct for polymer melt to ow and hence melt trapped in between the ridges. Hence, ber-matrix mechanical interlocking with treated bers is better.

3.2 Attenuated Total Reectance Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy

In order to investigate the possible changes in chemical composition of CF by plasma treatment, Attenuated total reectance Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (ATRF-TIR) analysis (Fig.6) was done in mid infrared range (700 4,000cm1). Spectrum of untreated ber does not show any signicant peaks

28

J. Bijwe and M. Sharma

Fig.7Raman spectra of the untreated and plasma treated carbon bers [22]

while that of plasma treated bers, presence of oxygenated polar functional groups was observed. Ether, carboxyl and carbonyl groups were observed corresponding to wave number range 9501,200, 1,6501,710cm1, respectively. These functional groups were responsible for improvement in adhesion between the matrix and fabric.

3.3 Micro Raman Spectroscopy

Carbon materials, such as carbon bers and other sp3 bonded amorphous carbons are strong Raman scatterers and the Micro Raman Spectroscopy (MRS) technique enables to distinguish between various structural organizations in these materials [2527]. The rst-order Raman spectra bands with peak positions 1,360 and 1,593cm1 are the main features of carbon materials and are called D bands (disordered) and G bands (graphitic), respectively [2831]. The degree of structural disorder on the surface of CF due to CRNOP treatment was characterized by the ratio of integrated intensity of disorder induced (ID) to Raman allowed band (IG). The ratio ID/IG (Fig.7) showed slight increase and a decrease in surface crystallite size (La). The size of crystallites located in the surface regions (La) was calculated using the empirical formula by Tuinstra and Koenig [32]; La for treated and untreated CF was 4.68 and 51.6nm, respectively. During surface treatment graphitic microstructure of CF is partially destructed,

Nano and Micro PTFE for Surface Lubrication

29

Fig.8HRTEM images of carbon bers; a untreated, b plasma treated bers; c and d are their corresponding auto correlated images, respectively [20]

the crystallite size is reduced, and the activity of the graphite crystallite boundary is improved [33, 34]. Figure8 supports this by indicating the increased ID/IG ratio, hence induced distortion (reduced crystallinity) due to treatment to CF.

3.4 High Resolution Transmission Electron Microscopy

High Resolution Transmission Electron Microscopy (HRTEM) is an indispensable tool for examining the ner details of the ber surface. It was preferred to compare the induced distortion in the graphitic planes of treated and untreated CF. Figure8 shows HRTEM images of longitudinal thin section for untreated and treated bers. Both bers have inter-planar spacing of 0.34nm; typically observed for (210) planes of PAN based CF and high purity carbon and graphite materials [3537]. The micrographs show the orientation of small graphite crystallites in CF. Both shows the coexistence of crystalline and amorphous phases which is accordance to the literature [38, 39]. Warner et al. [40] suggested that the structure of PAN bers is constitutive of ordered and amorphous domains with the length of the ordered regions ranging from 80 to 100, roughly twice that of the disordered regions. During ber manufacturing process uneven distribution of stresses during the drawing step leads to the existence of both the phases [38]. The auto correlated images of small sections are shown in respective inserts. While comparing the inserts, the distorted graphitic plane can be easily seen in the case of treated CF which supports the results from Raman spectroscopic studies (ID/IG ratio found increased in case of treated CF). The planes are more smother and regular in case of untreated CF. Distortion can be correlated with pitting on CF and hence improves their compatibility with the matrix material (FESEM studies in Sect. 3.1).

30

J. Bijwe and M. Sharma

Fig.9AFM images of carbon bers; a untreated b Plasma treated indicating increase in surface roughness from 114 to 264nm [19, 20]

3.5 Atomic Force Microscopy

Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) studies (Fig.9) were carried out to analyze the topographical and morphological changes induced on the surface of CF due to plasma treatment. Fiber tows of untreated and treated CF were mounted separately on the stainless steel magnetic stubs. The ne striations on the untreated carbon ber surface were due to the spinning of the ber precursor [41]. The observed features similar to FESEM studies such as surface etching, increased perforation and presences of deeper and narrower ridges were more clearly seen on the treated ber. The average surface roughness values for untreated and treated carbon bers were 23.28 and 52.43nm respectively, which conrmed the increase in surface area and alteration in morphology due to the treatment. The increase in surface roughness of treated carbon bers is benecial for enhance their reactivity towards matrix materials, since a rougher ber topography would lead to a higher degree of mechanical interlocking between ber and matrix [42].

3.6 Fiber: Matrix Adhesion Test

A simple test was performed to ensure enhancement in ber-matrix adhesion due to treatment. A small sample of bers (treated and untreated) was dipped n PES solution (in DCM 20wt %) for 10min followed by careful withdrawal of the bers and drying in identical way. The difference in layer of matrix adhering to the ber strand was examined with SEM (Fig.10). Figure10b conrms more polymer adhered to the treated ber rather than the untreated one. As compare to untreated bers (Sect. 3.1) deeper channels (along longitudinal axis) on the treated CF surface provide more surface areas (denier per lament) for polymer to adhere adequately, which in turns responsible for enhanced adhesion and hence the better mechanical interlocking between the ber and matrix.

Nano and Micro PTFE for Surface Lubrication

31

Fig.10SEM (15K) of impregnated bers; a before treatment b after plasma treatment [20]

The analysis from all surface characterization techniques revealed that the plasma treatment on ber surface altered its original inertness of and led to enhancement in ber matrix adhesion, which resulted in improved performance properties of their composites as discussed in subsequent section.

3.7 Mechanical Strength of CF

The reduction in single ber strength due to the ber modication methods is a critical issue. Generally, ber surface modication method increase the bermatrix interfacial strength but at the cost of decremented single ber strength properties. The CRNOP treatment reduced the strength of a carbon ber (5 to 10 %) [22].

4 Characterization of Developed Composites

The composites developed were characterized for their physical, mechanical and tribological properties as discussed in following sections.

4.1 Characterization of Composites with Treated and Untreated CF

Table 1 shows the details and designations of composites with tailored surfaces while Table2 summarizes the properties of composites and positive changes due to CRNOP treated fabric in a composite. The reinforcement inuenced the heat distortion temperature of PES appreciably (2530C). However, the CF treatment

32

J. Bijwe and M. Sharma

Table1Details of unmodied and PTFE modied PES-CF composites [19, 20] Designations of compositesa PESCFU PESCFT PESCFTN PESCFTSM PESCFTM
aPES CFUComposites

Av. PTFE particle size (FESEM studies) (nm) 5080 200250 400450

Shape of PTFE llers Highly spherical Sub rounded Sub angular

with untreated CF PESCFTComposites with treated CF PESCFTNComposite with treated CF and nano- sized (5080nm) PTFE on the surface PESCFTSMComposite with treated CF and submicron sized (150200nm) PTFE on the surface PESCFTMComposite with treated CF and micron sized (400450nm) PTFE on the surface Table2Physical and mechanical properties of CF-PES composites reinforced with untreated and plasma treated CF [20] Properties/materials Fiber weight (%) Void fraction Density (g/cm3) HDT ASTM D648 (C) Tensile strength (MPa) Tensile modulus (GPa) Toughness (MPa) Flexural strength (MPa) Flexural modulus (GPa) Interlaminar shear strength(MPa) PES 1.37 204 84 3 60 112 2.8 PESCFU 67.50 0.47 1.52 227 744 65 4.1 692 54 36 PESCFT 68.24 0.37 1.54 233 778 76 4.3 835 68 46 % changes due to CF treatment 21.3 1.3 2.6 4.4 14.4 4.7 17.1 20.6 21.7

had almost negligible effect on the HDT values of the composites (1.52.5%). Composites containing plasma treated CF proved superior to those with untreated CF conrming the improved ber-matrix adhesion as a result of treatment due to the increment in ber matrix mechanical interlocking.

4.2 Tribo-Characterization of Composites

Performance of composites was evaluated in adhesive sliding wear mode using pin on disc conguration as discussed in following subsection. 4.2.1 Methodology for Tribo-Evaluation of Composites Tribological studies in adhesive wear mode were carried out on UMT-3MT Tribometer supplied by CETR, USA. Prior to the experiment the composite pin slid against a rough mild steel disc for uniform contact. Initial weight of the pin

Nano and Micro PTFE for Surface Lubrication

33

was measured after cleaning ultrasonically with petroleum ether followed by drying. The pin was slid against a mild steel disc (Ra values range 0.10.2m) at a constant speed of 1m/s. After the experiment, pin was again weighed with an accuracy of 0.0001g and weight loss readings were used to calculate the specic wear rate (Ko) of composites. as a function of time during sliding was recorded with the help of viewer software. The specic wear rate (Ko) was calculated using the equation: W m3 N1 m1 K0 = (1) Ld Where; W is the weight loss in kg, the density of pin in kg/m3, L the load in N and d the sliding distance in meters. The experiment was repeated for three times and the average of two closest values of weight loss was used for specic wear rate calculations.

4.2.2 Tribological Aspects of PTFE as a Solid Lubricant PTFE has a peculiar morphological and molecular structure and has a high molecular weight inert uorocarbon compound which demonstrates mitigated London dispersive forces due to highly electronegative F- atoms. In PTFE molecule, CF forms non-reactive and instantaneous polarized multi poles. With the increases in surface contact, the polarizability increases due to the dispersed electron clouds hence closer interaction between different molecules. Tribological point of view, this is the most exploited solid lubricant in various amounts and sizes in the bulk of the composites barring nano-size, in general. In PTFE uorine atoms are close enough to form a smooth cylindrical surface against which other molecules can easily slide. At larger scale, the long chains of PTFE orient on the counter face surface during sliding creating a ne coherent transfer lm. The transfer lm creates a low shear-strength interface with the bulk PTFE material [43]. Hence the interaction is between PTFE lm and the PTFE in composite leading to least possible adhesion and hence very low . This lm transferring ability depends on the size and amount of PTFE particles apart from operating conditions.

4.2.3 Tribo-Characterization of Composites The essence of performance of composites is shown in Table3 which elaborates on the inuence of two modications (plasma treatment to the CF and PTFE on the surface of a composite) on WR wear resistance and . Overall WR of the composites was in the range 4.8 to 7.81014Nm/m3, which is rated as quite high and was in the range 0.060.25 which is a desirable range for such composites. In all the cases with increase in load WR and decreased appreciably and these are the general trends reported in the literature.

34

J. Bijwe and M. Sharma

Table3The essence of CF-PES composites performance due to treatments (plasma treatment to the CF and PTFE on the surface of a composite) [20] Composites Limit Wear resistance (WR)x1014 Nm/m3 load* under load (100N) (N) 2 4 6 7 8 9.5 PESCFU PESCFT PESCFTM PESCFTSM PESCFTN 700 700 800 900 950 6.5 7.2 7.5 7.6 7.8 6.4 7.1 7.2 7.3 7.4 5.6 6.0 6.4 6.5 6.6 5.2 5.3 5.7 5.4 5.6 F F 5.0 5.1 5.4 F F F F 4.8 Coefcient of friction () under load (100N) 2 4 6 7 8 9.5 0.25 0.21 0.16 0.15 0.14 0.19 0.18 0.13 0.12 0.11 0.18 0.13 0.11 0.10 0.09 0.14 F F 0.12 F F 0.11 0.09 F 0.10 0.08 F 0.09 0.07 0.06

*Shows failure of composite under the selected load

Inuence of Plasma Treatment on Fibers The plasma treatment led to increase in WR and decreased (Table3) of CF-PES composites which is a signicant improvement. As compared to the untreated ones, values of treated CF-PES composite lowered by ~15% with almost equal increment in wear resistance. The treatment to the bers led to the increase in the surface roughness and inclusion of functional groups which resulted in more bermatrix adhesion as discussed in the earlier section; leading to more resistance to peeling off or breakage of bers during sliding and hence lower wear.

Inuence of PTFE Modication on the Surface and Size of Particles The and WR were highly inuenced due to PTFE modication rather than size of PTFE particles on the surface. PTFE inclusion improved the and WR of composites to ~33 and ~14% respectively. Table3 summarizes the trends in improvement (Fig.11) due to various PTFE modications on Tribo-performance parameters (, WR and limiting load). The incremented limiting load value has established the efcacy of PTFE surface modication, the limiting load for PESCFU and PESCFT composites was up to 700N, while for tailored composites it was from 800 to 950N. For PESCFTN composite (tailored with 5080nm size PTFE); limiting load value was 950N with WR4.81014Nm/m3 and value0.06 conrming potential of nano-PTFE. Sliding wear performance of the composites improved with decrement in the size of PTFE llers. Well spherical nano llers provide high interfacial area between the llers and matrix. This leads to a better bonding between the two phases and hence better strength and toughness properties [6, 44]. Topographical smoothening and a rolling effect due to the inclusion of nano-llers at the surface is the reason for improved friction and wear performance of PESCFTN composite. It is of utmost importance that the NPs should be uniformly dispersed to get the best property prole. To avoid agglomeration the minimum wt % of llers is to be

Nano and Micro PTFE for Surface Lubrication Fig.11a Coefcient of friction; b specic wear rates as a function of increasing load for all surface designed series of composites [19, 20]

35

used. In literature on polymeric NCs generally 23wt % of nano-llers is claimed [4548] to be the optimum amount. The main feature of PTFE NPs which inuence the wear performance is their huge interfacial surface area. It was desired to see the service life of the designed surfaces. The CF-PES composites (without and with PTFE particles at the surface) were slid against steel disc till the steady state friction value starts uctuating at high friction torque. This signposted the limiting life of modied composites when few or no PTFE particles left on its surface for replenishment of transferred lm on the steel disc. Higher the limiting time, more is the tribo-utility of the surface. In the long experiment at 700N load, the limiting sliding times for the composite surface without PTFE, with micro sized PTFE and nanoPTFE were; 8.33, 17.7 and 21.3h respectively; indicating benecial effects of PTFE on the composite surface [19]. For PESCFTN composites, the transfer of thin tenacious PTFE lm on the steel disc surface was effective in maintaining steady values for long time.

36

J. Bijwe and M. Sharma

Fig.12SEM micrographs (500) of surface designed composites after wearing; a PESCFT, b PESCFTM and c PESCFTN; d, e and f are their respective high resolution FESEM images (75k) at 700N load at 1m/s speed (permission required) [19, 20]

Figure 12 shows SEM and FESEM micrographs of worn surfaces of surface designed composites. The bers were fully covered with the nano PTFE llers. PTFE layer is efciently transferred on the counter surface and sliding is between PTFE layer on the composite surface and thin tenacious layer transferred on the counter surface. The existence on nano-llers (Fig.12f) and micro scale (Fig.12e) is clearly visible with high resolution FESEM images of worn composites surface, which were absent for composites without tailored surface (Fig.12d).

5Concluding Remarks
Surface designing of PESCFT composites with micro, sub-micro and nano-scale PTFE llers improved the overall tribo-performance of composites; though the reduction in was signicant rather than the wear resistance. The idea of

Nano and Micro PTFE for Surface Lubrication

37

surface treatment of a composite with solid lubricants to safeguard the composites from an un-intentional reduction in strength properties and increase in the cost (if solid lubricant is employed in the whole composite rather than the surface both factors viz. strength and economics are affected signicantly) proved successful. Surface designing enhanced limiting load values of composites signicantly from 700 to 950N, limiting running time from 8 to 21h; reduction in (from 0.12 at 700N load to 0.065 at 900N load) and WR (from 5.2 to 5.6 1014Nm/m3 at 700N load) especially in the case of PESCFTN composite. The increased surface area of contact due to the inclusion of nanoPTFE at the composite surface was responsible for enhanced tribo-performance of PESCFTN composite.

References
1. Donnet C, Erdemir (2001) A Historical developments and new trends in tribological and solid lubricant coatings. Surf Coat Technol 180:7684 2. Teer DG (2001) New solid lubricant coatings. Wear 251:10681074 3. Blanchet TA, Kennedy FE (1992) Sliding wear mechanism of Polytetrauoroethylene (PTFE) and PTFE composites. Wear 153:229243 4. Nejhad MNG, Veedu VP, Yuen A, Askari D (2007) Polymer matrix composites with nanoscale reinforcements. Patent US 2007(0142548):A1 5. Bijwe J, Hufenbach W, Kunze K, Langkamp A (2008) Polymeric composites and bearings with engineered tribo-surfaces. In: Schlarb AK, Friedrich K (eds) Tribology of polymeric nano-composites. Elsevier, Amsterdam 6. Friedrich K, Zhang Z, Schlarb AK (2005) Effects of various llers on the sliding wear of polymer composites. Compos Sci Technol 65:23292343 7. Friedrich K, Fakirov S, Zhang Z (2005) Polymer compositesfrom nano to macro scale, Springer, US 8. Chang L, Zhang Z, Ye L, Friedrich K (2008) Synergistic effect of nanoparticles and traditional tribo-llers on sliding wear of polymeric hybrid composites. In: Schlarb AK, Friedrich K (eds) Tribology of polymeric nano-composites. Elsevier, Amsterdam 9. Zhang MQ, Rong MZ, Friedrich K (2006) Wear resisting polymer nanocomposites: reparation and properties. In: Mai YW, Yu ZZ (eds) Polymer nanocomposites. CRC Press, Washington 10. Zhang ZZ, Su FH, Wang K, Jiang W, Men XH, Liu WM (2005) Study on the friction and wear properties of carbon fabric composites reinforced with micro- and nano-particles. Mater Sci Eng A 404:251258 11. Su FH, Zhang ZZ, Guo F, Wang K, Liu WM (2006) Effects of solid lubricants on friction and wear properties of nomex fabric composites. Mater Sci Eng, A 424:333339 12. Kuo MC, Tsai CM, Huang JC, Chen M (2005) PEEK composites reinforced by nano-sized SiO2 and Al2O3 particulates. Mater Chem Phys 90:185195 13. Rong MZ, Zang M, Liu H, Zeng HM, Wetzel B, Freidrich K (2001) Microstructure and tribological behavior of polymeric nanocomposites. Ind Lubr Tribol 53:7277 14. Burris DL, Boes B, Bourne GR, Sawyer WG (2007) Polymeric nanocomposites for tribological applications. Macromol Mater Eng 292:387402 15. Friedrich K, Lu Z, Hager AM (1993) Overview on polymer composites for friction and wear application. Theoret Appl Fract Mech 19:111 16. Dwyer-Joyce RS, Sayles RS, Ioannides E (1994) An investigation into the mechanisms of closed three-body abrasive. Wear 175:133142

38

J. Bijwe and M. Sharma

17. Bahadur S (2000) The development of transfer layers and their role in polymer tribology. Wear 245:9299 18. Vaziri M, Spurr RT, Stott FH (1988) An investigation of the wear of polymeric materials. Wear 122:329342 19. Sharma M, Bijwe J (2012) Surface engineering of polymer composites with nano and micron sized PTFE llers. J Mater Sci 47:49284935 20. Sharma M (2011) Carbon fabric reinforced polymer composites: development, surface designing by micro and nano PTFE and performance evaluation, Ph D thesis, Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi, India 21. Tiwari S, Bijwe J, Panier S (2011) Tribological studies on Polyetherimide composites based on carbon fabric with optimized oxidation treatment. Wear 271:22522260 22. Tiwari S, Sharma M, Panier S, Mutel B, Mitschang P, Bijwe J (2011) Inuence of cold remote nitrogen oxygen plasma treatment on carbon fabric and its composites with specialty polymers. J Mater Sci 46:964974 23. Tiwari S, Bijwe J, Panier S (2011) Role of Nano-YbF3 treated carbon fabric on improving abrasive wear performance of polyetherimide composites. Tribol Lett 42:293300 24. Tiwari S, Bijwe J, Panier S (2011) Polyetherimide composites with gamma irradiated carbon fabric: studies on abrasive wear. Wear 270:688694 25. Meyer N, Marx G, Brzezinka KW (1994) Raman spectroscopy of carbon bres. J Anal Chem 349:167168 26. Sarraf H, karpov L, Louda P (2007) Surface modication of carbon bers. J Achievements Mater Manuf Eng 25:2430 27. Montes-Morn MA, Young RJ (2002) Raman spectroscopy study of high-modulus carbon bres: effect of plasma-treatment on the interfacial properties of single-ber-epoxy composites part II: characterisation of the bre-matrix interface. Carbon 40:857875 28. Morita K, Murata Y, Ishitani A, Murayama K, Ono T, Nakajima A (1986) Characterization of commercially available PAN (polyacrylonitrile)-based carbon bers. Pure Appl Chem 58:455468 29. Sharma SP, Lakkad SC (2011) Effect of CNTs growth on carbon bers on the tensile strength of CNTs grown carbon ber-reinforced polymer matrix composites. Compos Part A 42:815 30. Liu Y, Pan C, Wang J (2004) Raman spectra of carbon nanotubes and nanobers prepared by ethanol ames. J Mater Sci 39:10911094 31. Nemanich RJ, Solin SA (1979) First and second order Raman scattering from nite-size crystals of graphite. Phys Rev B 20:392401 32. Tuinstra F, Koenig JL (1970) Raman spectrum of graphite. J Chem Phys 53:11261130 33. Chaudhuri SN, Chaudhuri RA, Benner RE, Penugonda MS (2006) Raman spectroscopy for characterization of interfacial debonds between carbon bers and polymer matrices. Compos Struct 76:375387 34. Cao WW, Zhu B, Jing M, Wang CG (2008) Raman spectra of PAN-based carbon bers during surface treatment. NCBI PubMed 28:28852889 35. Tressaud A, Chambon M, Gupta V, Flandrois S, Bahl OP (1995) Fluorine-intercalated carbon bers III. A transmission electron microscopy study. Carbon 33:13391345 36. Sharma SP, Lakkad SC (2009) Morphology study of carbon nanospecies grown on carbon bers by thermal CVD technique. Surf Coat Technol 203:13291335 37. Gaskell DR (1981) Introduction to the thermodynamics of materials. McGraw-Hill, New York 38. Bai YJ, Wang CG, Lun N, Wang YX, Yu MJ, Zhu B (2006) HRTEM microstructures of PAN precursor bers. Carbon 44:17731778 39. Hai XS, Ying ZF, Huan LS, Dong-mei H, Qing-yun C (2010) Catalytic graphitization of Mo-B-doped polyacrylonitrile (PAN)-based carbon bers. J Central South Universityn Technol 17:703707 40. Warner SB, Uhlmann DR, Peebles LH (1975) Ion etching of amorphous and semicrystalline bers. J Mater Sci 10:758764

Nano and Micro PTFE for Surface Lubrication

39

41. Zhang X, Huang Y, Wang T (2006) Surface analysis of plasma grafted carbon ber. Appl Surf Sci 253:28852892 42. Paredes JI, Alonso AM, Tascn JMD (2000) Atomic force microscopy investigation of the surface modication of highly oriented pyrolytic graphite by oxygen plasma. J Mater Chem 10:15851590 43. Schadler LS, Brinson LC, Sawyer WG (2007) Polymer nanocomposites: a small part of the story. J Miner Met Mater Soc 59:5360 44. Kocsis JK, Zhang Z (2005) Structure-property relationships in nanoparticle/semi-crystalline thermoplastic composites. In: Calleja JFB, Michler G (eds) Mechanical properties of polymers based on nanostructure and morphology. CRC Press, New York 45. Xian G, Zhang Z, Friedrich K (2006) Tribological properties of micro and nanoparticleslled Poly(etherimide) Composites. J Appl Polym Sci 101:16781686 46. Chang L, Zhang Z, Zhang H, Friedrich K (2005) Effect of nanoparticles on the tribological behaviour of short carbon bre reinforced Poly(etherimide) composites. Tribol Int 38:966973 47. Zhang ZZ, Sua FH, Wang K, Jiang W, Mena XH, Liu WM (2005) Study on the friction and wear properties of carbon fabric composites reinforced with micro- and nano-particles. Mater Sci Eng, A 404:251258 48. Park DC, Kim SS, Kim BC, Lee SM, Lee DG (2006) Wear characteristics of carbon-phenolic woven composites mixed with nano-particles. Compos Struct 74:8998

http://www.springer.com/978-3-642-33881-6