Capital Budgeting
Capital Budgeting
Capital Budgeting
Pay-back period is 4 years, i.e., the investment is fully recovered in 4 years.
(b) In the case of Uneven or Unequal Cash Inflows: In the case of uneven or unequal cash
inflows, the Pay-back period is determined with the help of cumulative cash inflow. It can be
calculated by adding up the cash inflows until the total is equal to the initial investment.
Page 72
Illustration: 2
From the following information you are required to calculate pay-back period :
A project require initial investment of Rs. 40,000 and generate cash inflows of Rs. 16,000, Rs,
14,000, Rs. 8,000 and Rs. 6,000 in the first, Second, third, and fourth year respectively.
Solution :
Calulation Pay-back Period with the help of Cumulative Cash Inflows
Year Annual Cash Inflows Rs. Cumulative Cash Inflows Rs.
1
2
3
4
16,000
14,000
8,000
6,000
16,000
30,000
38,000
44,000
The above table shows that at the end of 4th years the cumulative cash inflows exceeds the
investment of Rs. 40,000. Thus the pay-back period is as follows :
Pay back Period = 3Years +
= 3Years +
= 3.33 Years
Page 73
Chapter 1
Bokaro Steel Plant:
Bokaro Steel Plant was fourth integrated plant in the public sector. The company starts taking shape
in 1965 in collaboration with the Soviet Union. Bokaro Steel Plant (BSL) was incorporated in 1964
and later merged with SAIL as a subsidiary company and then as a unit under the Public Sector Iron
& Steel Companies Act 1978.
It was the first Swadeshi Steel Plant built with maximum equipment and material. Its first Blast
Furnace was started on 2
nd
October, 1978 and its first phase of 1.7 MT Ingot Steel was completed on
26
th
February, 1978 with the commissioning of its third Blast Furnace. And in 90s it was upgraded
from 4 MT to 4.5 MT of liquid Steel.
The new feature added in the modernization of SMS-II includes:
Two twin-stand slab caster along with a Steel Refining Unit
The modernization of its Hot Strip Mill adds a new feature like:
High Pressure de-scalars
Work rolls bending
Hydraulic automatic gauge control
Page 74
Quick work roll change
Laminar cooling
And, its less efficient Pusher Type Furnace were replaced by new Walking Beam Reheating
Furnace.
Two of its existing Hydraulic Coiler was removed by a new improved Hydraulic Coiler. With the
modernization and completion of Hot Strip Mill, Bokaro Steel Plant starts producing top quality of
hot rolled products and which was accepted in the Global Market.
Bokaro Steel Plant is designed to produce flat products like:
Hot/Cold Rolled Coils
Hot/Cold Rolled Sheets
Hot Rolled Plates
Tin Mill Black Plates
And, Galvanized Plain and Corrugated Sheets
Bokaro Steel Plant has provided a strong raw material to many modern Engineering Industries such
as Automobiles, Pipe and Tube, LPG Cylinder, Barrel and Drum Producing Industries.
Page 75
Upgradation of Blast Furnace-2 at BSL:
Bokaro Steel Plant is equipped with 5 Blast Furnaces, BF Nos. 1 to 5. The furnaces are having
identical hearth diameter of 9.75m and useful volume of 2000 cum. The Plant was originally
designed for 1.7 MT of Crude Steel, which has progressively increased to 4.5 MT.
As per the Corporate Plan-2012 of SAIL, the hot metal production from the existing 5 Blast
Furnace is targeted at 6.5 Mtpa in 2012, up from 4.7 MT in 2005-06. This target is planned to be
achieved through upgradation of the Blast Furnace to improve productivity levels, introduction of
auxiliary fuel injector in all blast furnaces, revamping of turbo blowers, installation of cast house
slag granulation plants etc. As per plan, the upgradation of Blast Furnaces is to be carried out during
the extended capital repairs shutdown period of Blast Furnace No.-2 was commissioned on
12.04.1976. The last Capital Repair of BF No.-2 was carried out between 16.06.1996 to 15.08.1996.
The furnace is due for extended Category II repair in the year 2007-2008 and BSL has decided to use
this opportunity to upgrade the furnace so that the reportedly cost of capital repair of around Rs.50
crore can be saved and the shut-down period can be minimized.
Page 76
The present proposal envisages Rebuilding of Blast Furnace No. 2 with working volume of
furnace at 2250 m as against the current capacity of 1758 m. The major technological facilities
existing in BF No.2 include bell less top charging system with PLC control, high top pressure
operation, ceramic pad in hearth with carbon blocks in the periphery, under hearth cooling with air,
twin cast houses 180 apart, hot blast stoves system of Russian design, PLC controlled conveyorised
stock-house having sinter & coke screening facilities, etc.
The proposed rebuilding would enable the Blast Furnace-2 to increase its productivity at an
envisaged level of 2.0 t/m/day from the base level of 1.35 t/m/day (actual 2005-06)resulting in
higher production of 4500 t/day of Hot Metal from the base level production of 2373 t/day. The hot
blast temperature would be 1200C from 909C with reduction in coke consumption of 385 kg/thm
Page 77
from 543 kg/thm of base level with use of CDI coal injection of 135 kg/thm. The technological
parameters and design features of the existing BF No.2 vis--vis upgradated BF No.2 are as under:
Parameters Existing (2005-06) After Upgradation
Working Volume (cum) 1758 2250
H.M. Production (tpd) 2373 4500
Coke Rate (kg/thm) 543 385
Furnace Top Pressure (kg/cm) 0.95 2.0
Blast Volume (NM/min) 2928 3065 (with
6% Oxygen enrichment)
Hot Blast Temp. (C) 909 1200
Hot Blast Pressure (kg/cmmax.) 2.11 3.5
Page 78
2. Objective and Scope
Objective of the Studies:
To describe the organizational profile of Bokaro Steel Plant (BSL).
To get familiarity with the various components of Capital Budgeting in BSL.
To discuss the importance of the Capital Budgeting management.
To find out the difference between the theoretical and practical aspect of Capital Budgeting
management.
Determination of proposal and investments, inflows and outflows in BSL.
To evaluate the investment proposal made by the company.
To summarize and to suggest for the better investment proposal by using capital budgeting
techniques.
To study and come out with any solution for improvement of Capital Budgeting management
at BSL
The sole objective of this project was to analyze the Capital Budgeting on Blast Furnace-2 at
Bokaro Steel Plant.
Page 79
To assess the significance of Capital Budgeting by selecting a few important parameters such
as:
Net Present Value (NPV)
Internal Rate of Return (IRR)
Profitability Index (PI)
Payback Period (PB)
Discounted Payback
Average Rate of Return (ARR)
Scope of the Studies:
The study is limited to Capital Budgeting decision of Blast Furnace-2 in Bokaro Steel Plant.
The findings can be used by other to understand the proposal and its attractiveness to permit
financial and commercial analysis.
This influence the firm growth in long term consequences capital investment decision that
what the firm can do in future.
Page 80
3. Theoretical Perspective
Capital Budgeting:
Capital Budgeting is a planning process which is use to determine the Long Term Investment of an
Organization such as investment in new machinery, replacement of machineries, opening of a new
plant, innovation of new product and research development projects.
Importance of I nvestment Decisions:
They influence the firms growth in long run,
They are irreversible or reversible at substantial loss.
Types of I nvestment Decisions:
Expansion of Existing Business:
A company may add capacity to its existing product lines to expand existing operation.
Replacement and Modernization:
The main objective of modernization and replacement is to improve operating efficiency and
reduce cost.
Another useful ways of Classify Investment:
Mutually Exclusive Investments:
Mutually Exclusive Investments serves the same purpose and competes with each other.
Independent Investment:
Independent Investment serves different purposes and do not compete with each other.
Contingent Investment:
Contingent Investments are dependent projects; the choice of one investment necessitates
undertaking one or more other investment.
Page 81
Evaluation Criteria:
They are classified in two categories:
Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Criteria:
Net Present Value (NPV)
Internal Rate of Return (IRR)
Profitability Index (PI)
Non-Discounted Cash Flow Criteria:
Payback (PB)
Discounted Payback
Accounting Rate of Return (ARR)
Discounted Cash Flow (DFC) Criteria:
Net Present Value (NPV):
The difference between PV of cash flows and PV of cash outflows is equal to NPV; the
firms opportunity cost of capital being the discount rate.
Rules:
Accepted if NPV > 0 (i.e. NPV is Positive)
Rejected if NPV < 0 (i.e. NPV is negative)
Project may be accepted if NPV = 0
Internal Rate of Return (IRR):
The discount rate which equates the present value of an investments cash inflows and
outflows is its Internal Rate of Return.
Rules:
Page 82
Accepted if IRR > k
Rejected if IRR < k
Project may be accepted if IRR = k
Profitability Index (PI):
The ratio of the present value of the cash flows to the initial outlay.
Rules:
Accepted if PI > 1.0
Rejected if PI < 1.0
Project may be accepted if PI = 1.0
Non-Discounted Cash Flow Criteria:
Payback:
The number of years required to recover the initial outlay of the investment.
Rules:
Accepted if PB < Standard payback
Rejected if PB > Standard payback
Discounted Payback:
The number of years required in recovering the cash outlay on the present value basis is the
discounted payable period. Except using discounted cash flows in calculating payback, this
method has all the demerits of payback method.
Page 83
Average Rate of Return:
An average rate of return found by dividing the average net operating profit [EBIT*(1-T)]
by the average investment.
Rules:
Accepted if ARR > minimum rate
Rejected if ARR < minimum rate.
Page 84
4. Methodology and Procedure of Work
Methodology:
The data which I have collected for making this project is a combination of both primary data and
secondary data.
Primary Data:
The information collected directly without any reference. It was mainly through interactions with
concerned officers individually. Some of the information is obtained with personal observation.
These sources include:
Guidance given by the project guide, Mr. R.B.Sharma, Asst. Manager (F&A)
Interaction with the various department Managers of BSL
Secondary Data:
The data is from the number of books, records, annual reports published by the company, business
magazines and business news papers.
Collection of data from annual records and internal published books
By Journals and magazines
Page 85
Annual Report of the Company.
Work Procedures:
1-2 weeks: In these two weeks I got acquainted through the existing work which has been
done in the Finance & Accounts department and have a fair bit of idea on the above
mentioned topic so that I am acquainted with all the aspects which need to be covered in
order to have a better insight on the given topic.
3-5 weeks: In this period I got the financial budgeting data of upgradation of Blast Furnace-2
to study and analyze it.
6-8 weeks: In this period I had done analysis of all the data collected, interpret them and
reached to a conclusion. Also with the help of my Project Guide, I would start preparing the
final report.
Page 86
Analysis of Data
The proposed rebuilding would enable the Blast Furnace-2 to increase its productivity at an
envisaged level of 2.0 t/m/day from the base level of 1.35 t/m/day (actual 2005-06) resulting in
higher production of 4500 t/day of Hot Metal from the base level production of 2373 t/day. The hot
blast temperature would be 1200C from 909C with reduction in coke consumption of 385 kg/thm
from 543 kg/thm of base level with use of CDI coal injection of 135 kg/thm.
Capital Cost Estimate (Summary):
Table-1
Base Date: 3
rd
Qtr. 2006 FE parity: 1 euro= Rs.58.54
Sl. No.
Item
FC (Cr.)
LC (Cr.)
Total (Cr.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Equipment
Structures
Refractories
Civil Work
Erection & Comm
Engg. & Constn.
Freight & Insurance
Taxes & Duties
Others (Training)
Contingencies
97.55
29.38
23.70
7.62
0.97
7.96
94.43
52.71
26.50
23.45
41.25
37.29
15.23
99.81
0.25
19.55
191.98
52.71
55.88
23.45
41.25
60.98
22.85
99.81
1.22
27.51
11
Total Plant Cost
167.17
410.47
577.64
Page 87
12 IDC 15.16
13
Capital Cost
592.80
Therefore, Total Capital Cost = Rs.592.80 (Cr.)
Gross Margin Calculation:
Table-2
Sl. No.
Particulars
Unit
Base Case
Proposed Case
I.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
II.
1.
2.
3.
4.
Technical Parameters:
Working Volume of Furnace
No. of working days
Oxygen enrichment
BF Productivity (Working Volume)
Hot Metal Production
Addl. H M Prodn. w.r.t base case
Equivalent Pig Production (Y=93%)
Coke rate (Skip)
Savings in coke consumption
CDI coal injection
Avg. power generation from TRT
Steam consumption
Benefits:
Contribution on additional Pig Iron
Saving due to less Coke consumption
Addl. Power generation from TRT
Saving in steam cons.
cu m
days
%
t/m/day
000t
000t
000t
Kg/thm
000t/yr
Kg/thm
MW
tph
Unit
Rs. Cr.
Rs. Cr.
Rs. Cr.
Rs. Cr.
1758
350
Nil
1.35
823
543
4.66
Rate
4255
9350
3177
292
2250
350
6%
2.00
1575
752
699
385
240
135
8.08
0
Amount
297.56
232.66
21.47
1.14
Page 88
Total Benefits
Rs. Cr.
552.84
III.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Addl. Expenditure:
CDI coal @135 kg/thm
Electricity (@27 kwh/tpci)
Nitrogen @1900 nm/hr (CDI+TRT)
Oxygen consumption - 13000 nm/hr
CO gas 8695 nm/hr (CDI+BF+TRT)
Make-up water
Repair & Maint. @2.5% of plant cost
Rs. Cr.
Rs. Cr.
Rs. Cr.
Rs. Cr.
Rs. Cr.
Rs. Cr.
6700
3177
1290
3130
357
1000
156.70
2.01
2.06
34.18
10.95
0.10
14.44
Total Addl. Expenditure
Rs. Cr.
220.45
IV.
GROSS MARGIN (II-III)
Rs. Cr.
332.39
I nitial Data:
Table-3
Year Cash Inflow
(Cr.)
Interest
(Cr.)
Depreciation
(Cr.)
Profit
Before
Tax
(PBT)
(Cr.)
Tax
(33.66%)
(Cr.)
Profit
After
Tax
(PAT)
(Cr.)
Cash Inflow
(Dept.+PAT)
(Cr.)
1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 110.73 29.62 21.11 60.00 20.19 39.80 60.91
3 268.91 44.44 42.21 182.26 61.35 120.91 163.12
4 300.55 37.03 42.21 221.30 74.49 146.81 189.02
5 316.36 29.62 42.21 244.53 82.31 162.22 204.43
6 316.36 22.22 42.21 251.93 84.80 167.13 209.43
7 316.36 14.81 42.21 259.34 87.29 172.04 214.25
Page 89
8 316.36 7.41 42.21 266.74 89.79 176.96 219.17
9 316.36 0.00 42.21 274.15 92.28 181.87 224.08
10 316.36 0.00 42.21 274.15 92.28 181.87 224.08
11 316.36 0.00 42.21 274.15 92.28 181.87 224.08
12 316.36 0.00 42.21 274.15 92.28 181.87 224.08
13 316.36 0.00 42.21 274.15 92.28 181.87 224.08
14 316.36 0.00 42.21 274.15 92.28 181.87 224.08
15 316.36 0.00 42.21 274.15 92.28 181.87 224.08
16 316.36 0.00 42.21 274.15 92.28 181.87 224.08
17 316.36 0.00 42.21 274.15 92.28 181.87 224.08
18 316.36 0.00 42.21 274.15 92.28 181.87 224.08
19 316.36 0.00 42.21 274.15 92.28 181.87 224.08
20 316.36 0.00 42.21 274.15 92.28 181.87 224.08
21 316.36 0.00 42.21 274.15 92.28 181.87 224.08
22 158.18 0.00 42.21 115.97 39.03 76.93 119.14
Net Present Value:
Table-4
Year Depreciation
(Cr.)
Profit After
Tax (PAT)
(Cr.)
Cash Inflow
(Dept.+PAT)
(Cr.)
PVIF (10%)
(Cr.)
PV (Cr.)
1 0 0 0 0.909 0
2 21.11 39.80 60.91 0.826 50.31
3 42.21 120.91 163.12 0.751 122.50
4 42.21 146.81 189.02 0.683 129.10
5 42.21 162.22 204.43 0.620 126.75
6 42.21 167.13 209.43 0.564 118.12
7 42.21 172.04 214.25 0.513 109.91
8 42.21 176.96 219.17 0.466 102.13
9 42.21 181.87 224.08 0.424 95.01
10 42.21 181.87 224.08 0.385 86.27
Page 90
11 42.21 181.87 224.08 0.350 78.43
12 42.21 181.87 224.08 0.318 71.26
13 42.21 181.87 224.08 0.289 64.76
14 42.21 181.87 224.08 0.263 58.93
15 42.21 181.87 224.08 0.239 53.56
16 42.21 181.87 224.08 0.217 48.63
17 42.21 181.87 224.08 0.197 44.14
18 42.21 181.87 224.08 0.179 40.11
19 42.21 181.87 224.08 0.163 36.53
20 42.21 181.87 224.08 0.148 33.16
21 42.21 181.87 224.08 0.135 30.25
22 42.21 76.93 119.14 0.122 14.54
Total 1514.39
Total Capital Cost = Rs.592.80 (Cr.)
Net Present Value = Present Value of Cash Inflow Cash Outflow
= Rs. (1514.39 592.80)
= Rs.921.59 (Cr.)
Profitability I ndex:
Table-5
Year Depreciation
(Cr.)
Profit After
Tax (PAT)
(Cr.)
Cash Inflow
(Dept.+PAT)
(Cr.)
PVIF (10%)
(Cr.)
PV (Cr.)
1 0 0 0 0.909 0
2 21.11 39.80 60.91 0.826 50.31
3 42.21 120.91 163.12 0.751 122.50
4 42.21 146.81 189.02 0.683 129.10
5 42.21 162.22 204.43 0.620 126.75
6 42.21 167.13 209.43 0.564 118.12
Page 91
7 42.21 172.04 214.25 0.513 109.91
8 42.21 176.96 219.17 0.466 102.13
9 42.21 181.87 224.08 0.424 95.01
10 42.21 181.87 224.08 0.385 86.27
11 42.21 181.87 224.08 0.350 78.43
12 42.21 181.87 224.08 0.318 71.26
13 42.21 181.87 224.08 0.289 64.76
14 42.21 181.87 224.08 0.263 58.93
15 42.21 181.87 224.08 0.239 53.56
16 42.21 181.87 224.08 0.217 48.63
17 42.21 181.87 224.08 0.197 44.14
18 42.21 181.87 224.08 0.179 40.11
19 42.21 181.87 224.08 0.163 36.53
20 42.21 181.87 224.08 0.148 33.16
21 42.21 181.87 224.08 0.135 30.25
22 42.21 76.93 119.14 0.122 14.54
Total 1514.39
Present Value (PV) of Cash Inflows = Rs.1514.39 (Cr.)
Present Value (PV) of Cash Outflow = Rs.592.80 (Cr.)
Therefore,
Profitability Index = PV of Cash Inflows PV of Cash Outflow
= 1514.39 592.80
= 2.55 (times)
Page 92
I nternal Rate of Return:
Discounted rate taken as 22%.
Table-6
Year Cash Inflow
(Dept.+PAT)
(Cr.)
PVIF (22%)
(Cr.)
PV (Cr.)
1 0 0.819 0
2 60.91 0.671 40.87
3 163.12 0.550 89.71
4 189.02 0.451 85.24
5 204.43 0.370 75.63
6 209.43 0.303 63.45
7 214.25 0.248 53.13
8 219.17 0.203 44.49
9 224.08 0.167 37.42
10 224.08 0.136 30.47
11 224.08 0.112 25.09
12 224.08 0.092 20.61
13 224.08 0.075 16.80
14 224.08 0.061 13.66
15 224.08 0.050 11.20
16 224.08 0.041 9.18
17 224.08 0.034 7.61
18 224.08 0.027 6.05
19 224.08 0.022 4.92
20 224.08 0.018 4.03
21 224.08 0.015 3.36
22 119.14 0.012 1.42
Total 644.45
Page 93
Where,
RV = Relative Value
HV = Higher Value, LV = Lower Value
HR = Higher Rate, LR = Lower Rate
Discounted rate taken as 24%.
Table-7
Year Cash Inflow
(Dept.+PAT)
(Cr.)
PVIF (24%)
(Cr.)
PV (Cr.)
1 0 0.806 0
2 60.91 0.650 39.59
3 163.12 0.524 85.47
4 189.02 0.423 79.95
5 204.43 0.341 69.71
6 209.43 0.275 57.59
7 214.25 0.221 47.34
8 219.17 0.178 39.01
9 224.08 0.144 32.26
10 224.08 0.116 25.99
11 224.08 0.093 20.83
12 224.08 0.075 16.80
13 224.08 0.061 13.66
14 224.08 0.049 10.97
15 224.08 0.039 8.73
16 224.08 0.032 7.17
17 224.08 0.025 5.60
18 224.08 0.020 4.48
19 224.08 0.016 3.58
20 224.08 0.013 2.91
21 224.08 0.010 2.24
Page 94
22 119.14 0.008 0.95
Total 574.92
Discounted rate taken as 22% = 644.45 (Cr.)
Discounted rate taken as 24% = 574.92 (Cr.)
Therefore,
Internal Rate of Return = LR + {(HV - RV) (HV - LV)} * (HR - LR)
= 22 + {(644.45 592.80) (644.45 574.92)} * (24 - 22)
= 23.48%
Payback Period:
Table-8
Year Depreciation
(Cr.)
Profit After
Tax (PAT)
(Cr.)
Cash Inflow
(Dept.+PAT)
(Cr.)
Cumulative
Cash Inflow
(Cr.)
1 0 0 0 0
2 21.11 39.80 60.91 60.91
3 42.21 120.91 163.12 224.03
4 42.21 146.81 189.02 413.05
5 42.21 162.22 204.43 617.48
6 42.21 167.13 209.43 826.91
7 42.21 172.04 214.25 1041.16
8 42.21 176.96 219.17 1260.33
9 42.21 181.87 224.08 1484.41
10 42.21 181.87 224.08 1708.49
11 42.21 181.87 224.08 1932.57
12 42.21 181.87 224.08 2156.65
13 42.21 181.87 224.08 2380.73
Page 95
14 42.21 181.87 224.08 2604.81
15 42.21 181.87 224.08 2828.89
16 42.21 181.87 224.08 3052.97
17 42.21 181.87 224.08 3277.05
18 42.21 181.87 224.08 3501.13
19 42.21 181.87 224.08 3725.21
20 42.21 181.87 224.08 3949.29
21 42.21 181.87 224.08 4173.37
22 42.21 76.93 119.14 4292.51
Total 4292.51
Payback Period = 4 years 10 months.
When we are adding the Cash Inflows, we are finding that Rs.413.05 of the original outlay is
recovered in the first 4 years. And in the fifth year Cash Inflow generated is Rs. 204.43 and only
Rs.179.75 0f the original outlay remains to be recovered.
So, {(179.75 204.43) * 12} = 10 months.
Discounted Payback Period:
Table-9
Year Cash Inflow
(Dept.+PAT)
(Cr.)
PVIF (10%)
(Cr.)
PV (Cr.) Cumulative
PV (Cr.)
1 0 0.909 0 0
2 60.91 0.826 50.31 50.31
3 163.12 0.751 122.50 172.81
4 189.02 0.683 129.10 301.91
5 204.43 0.620 126.75 428.66
6 209.43 0.564 118.12 546.78
7 214.25 0.513 109.91 656.69
Page 96
8 219.17 0.466 102.13 758.82
9 224.08 0.424 95.01 853.83
10 224.08 0.385 86.27 940.10
11 224.08 0.350 78.43 1018.53
12 224.08 0.318 71.26 1089.79
13 224.08 0.289 64.76 1154.55
14 224.08 0.263 58.93 1213.48
15 224.08 0.239 53.56 1267.04
16 224.08 0.217 48.63 1315.67
17 224.08 0.197 44.14 1359.81
18 224.08 0.179 40.11 1399.92
19 224.08 0.163 36.53 1436.45
20 224.08 0.148 33.16 1469.61
21 224.08 0.135 30.25 1499.86
22 119.14 0.122 14.54 1514.40
Total 1514.40
Payback Period = 6 years 5 months
When we are adding the Cash Inflows, we are finding that Rs.546.78 of the original outlay is
recovered in the first 6 years. And in the seventh year Cash Inflow generated is Rs.109.91 and only
Rs.46.02 of the original outlay remains to be recovered.
So, {(46.02 109.91) * 12} = 5 months.
Average Rate of Return:
Table-10
Year Cash Inflow
(Dept.+PAT)
(Cr.)
Depreciation
(Cr.)
Cash Inflow
(Before Dept.)
(Cr.)
1 0 0 0
Page 97
2 60.91 21.11 39.80
3 163.12 42.21 120.91
4 189.02 42.21 146.81
5 204.43 42.21 162.22
6 209.43 42.21 167.13
7 214.25 42.21 172.04
8 219.17 42.21 176.96
9 224.08 42.21 181.87
10 224.08 42.21 181.87
11 224.08 42.21 181.87
12 224.08 42.21 181.87
13 224.08 42.21 181.87
14 224.08 42.21 181.87
15 224.08 42.21 181.87
16 224.08 42.21 181.87
17 224.08 42.21 181.87
18 224.08 42.21 181.87
19 224.08 42.21 181.87
20 224.08 42.21 181.87
21 224.08 42.21 181.87
22 119.14 42.21 76.93
Total 3427.11
Average Income = 3427.11 22 = 155.77 (Cr.)
Average Investment = 592.80 2 = 296.40 (Cr.)
Therefore,
Average Rate of Return = (Average Income Average Investment) * 100
= (155.77 296.40) * 100
= 52.55%
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Summary
Assets become outdated and obsolete with technological change and changing demands of the
business. The upgradation and modernization decision helps to improve operating efficiency and
reduce cost.
The project titled: Capital Budgeting Decision at Bokaro Steel Plant is an attempt to understand
and analyze the capital budgeting decision at Bokaro Steel Plant (B.S.L).
This project includes all the financial aspect of capital budgeting. The capital at BSL is at a very
large scale. Besides focusing on the various activities undertaken at capital budgeting, the project
tries to shed light on the decision making involved in capital budgeting decision.
Keeping this background in view, an attempt is made to examine the capital budgeting practices in
SAIL with special references to Bokaro Steel Plant. The project contains the basic postulates of
capital budgeting procedure for the analysis of capital budgeting, techniques being used to define the
capital budgeting and its impact on the management decisions. All this had been done to get a clear
view of the techniques of capital budgeting decision in Bokaro Steel Plant.
Page 105
Conclusion
Bokaro Steel Plant is a major player in the steel sectors. It has a number of large machinery which
we know are necessary for a steel company and one of it is Blast Furnace. Bokaro Steel Plant have 5
Blast Furnace, among them Bokaro Steel Plant has a proposal to upgrade its Blast Furnace No.-2.
The proposal was evaluated on a number of criteria like NPV, IRR, ARR, Profitability Index,
Payback Period and Discounted Payback Period, and after evaluation we found that this proposal
was good for the company because if this proposal is accepted then it will increase the shareholders
wealth as it is generating cash inflows greater than the opportunity cost. The Payback Period of this
proposal is also short and in less number of years it is generating the initial cash outlay. So after
evaluating this proposal we can say that this proposal is very beneficial for SAIL and it is
recommended to take this proposal for better productivity.