Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 2K views

    CTC Lesson Plan Checklist Feedback Form

    Uploaded by

    circlestretch
    This document contains a checklist and feedback form for evaluating lesson plans. It has 17 principles for lesson plans that are each rated by the teacher and administrator on a scale of perfect, good but needs work, or needs a lot of work. The principles cover ensuring lessons are engaging, differentiated, and support all learning styles and needs. It also includes a self-reflection section for teachers to evaluate their own lessons.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    CTC Lesson Plan Checklist Feedback Form

    Uploaded by

    circlestretch
    2K views3 pages
    This document contains a checklist and feedback form for evaluating lesson plans. It has 17 principles for lesson plans that are each rated by the teacher and administrator on a scale of perfect, good but needs work, or needs a lot of work. The principles cover ensuring lessons are engaging, differentiated, and support all learning styles and needs. It also includes a self-reflection section for teachers to evaluate their own lessons.

    Original Title

    CTC Lesson Plan Checklist Feedback Form[1]

    Copyright

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Available Formats

    DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document contains a checklist and feedback form for evaluating lesson plans. It has 17 principles for lesson plans that are each rated by the teacher and administrator on a scale of perfect, good but needs work, or needs a lot of work. The principles cover ensuring lessons are engaging, differentiated, and support all learning styles and needs. It also includes a self-reflection section for teachers to evaluate their own lessons.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as doc, pdf, or txt
    2K views3 pages

    CTC Lesson Plan Checklist Feedback Form

    Uploaded by

    circlestretch
    This document contains a checklist and feedback form for evaluating lesson plans. It has 17 principles for lesson plans that are each rated by the teacher and administrator on a scale of perfect, good but needs work, or needs a lot of work. The principles cover ensuring lessons are engaging, differentiated, and support all learning styles and needs. It also includes a self-reflection section for teachers to evaluate their own lessons.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as doc, pdf, or txt
    of 3
    At a glance
    Powered by AI
    The document provides a checklist for evaluating lesson plans based on principles like differentiation, intellectual stimulation, and inclusion of different learning modalities.

    The lesson plans are being evaluated on principles like filling class periods with engaging activities, differentiating instruction, including modifications, being intellectually stimulating, and having an obvious scope and sequence.

    The document suggests that modifications for students who need them could include visuals, modified steps, and access to augmentative devices to support lessons.

    Celebrate the Children Planning Checklist and Feedback Form 2009-2010

    Teacher:__________________________________

    Date:_____________________________________

    Feedback by:______________________________

    Lesson Plan Principle Teacher Check List and Admin Rating and Notes
    Notes P-Perfect!
    G-Good, but needs some work!
    N-Needs a lot of work
    1 There was enough planned
    to fill entire periods. The
    students should be
    intensively engaged for the
    entire day based on these
    plans.
    2 Instruction was
    differentiated for the
    different levels of students
    and individual IEP goals
    were clearly targeted.
    There was an obvious
    preparation of
    individualized materials
    (e.g., work boxes, folders,
    etc.).
    3 There are modifications for
    the students who need
    them (e.g., Visuals,
    modified steps to a lesson,
    FC or access to
    augmentative device for
    lessons).
    4 Lesson plans are
    intellectually stimulating
    and respect to the
    students’ levels.
    5 There is an obvious scope
    and sequence to all the
    lessons across the week or
    month.
    6 Language Arts included
    Literature and reading
    comprehension, spelling
    and vocabulary, and
    writing and grammar

    1
    7 Curriculum resources were
    listed in the plans. CTC
    resources were used in
    addition to other resources.
    8 The lessons are dynamic,
    experience-based/hands-
    on and support
    comprehension!
    9 Lessons will elicit the
    “Gleam in the eye,” are
    motivating and meaningful
    to the students.
    1 Where the different
    0 processing modalities
    supported in the plans:
    visuals to support
    understanding, movement
    to support regulation and
    thinking, motor planning
    opportunities, etc.
    1 Was there an awareness
    1 of the overall unique
    processing needs of the
    individual students in the
    plans?
    1 Did lessons tie into,
    2 compliment and build off of
    each other across
    subjects, use a common
    theme?
    1 Were situations that
    3 required the students to
    engage with their peers
    included? Often?
    1 Were the CCCS clearly
    4 listed and varied?
    1 Assessment procedures
    5 were clear and varied
    across subjects.
    1 Tests and quizzes were
    6 assigned regularly
    1 Quality homework was
    7 planned as appropriate.
    Parents will get a sense of
    what is being worked on
    from the HW.

    2
    Additional Comments:

    SELF-REFLECTION
    • Did I use language
    and gestures to
    exaggerate my
    intent?
    • Did I emphasize key
    words for the
    students who
    needed this
    modification?
    • Was there peer
    interaction?
    • Were my students
    kept intensively
    engaged for the
    entire period?
    • Did my students
    learn something?

    You might also like