Syracuse Billion Proposal
Syracuse Billion Proposal
Syracuse Billion Proposal
Syracuse Agenda
Projects
CNY Natural Chilled Water Project
and Water Main Replacement
Road Reconstruction
12
Exhibits
A Assessing the Feasibility of a Central New York
Naturally Chillded Water Project
14
46
68
90
November 2014
Projects
CNY Naturally Chilled Water Project ($125M)
and Water Main Replacement ($726M)
Construct a Central New York Chilled Water Cooling System to use
naturally chilled water from Skaneateles Lake to cool buildings in Syracuse.
The CNY Naturally Chilled Water Project would update and add to Syracuses existing water distribution
infrastructure, adding a system which would cool buildings using water from Skaneateles Lake as opposed
to electricity. Similar infrastructure projects are currently in use at Cornell University and the City of
Toronto. The State University of New York College of Environmental Science and Forestry and a host of
qualified experts found such a project to be viable. A copy of the Executive Summary of the Feasibility
Report, dated April 13, 2011, is attached as Exhibit A.
The cooling requirement for most large buildings in Syracuse is supplied by mechanical chillers. These
mechanical chillers are powered by electricity and the annual costs for the CNY region are approximately
$6.5 million. Moreover, New York State imports approximately 12 percent of its electricity. Energy
generation from renewable sources like water reduces dependency on imported energy, reduces greenhouse
gas emissions, and improves urban resiliency in the face of fluctuating commodity prices and natural
disasters.
In 2013, the Brookings Institution and a number of CNY regional organizations engaged in a datadriven research process to design a comprehensive, strategic approach to assess the regions challenges
and align its assets and draft strategies for success. The result was the CenterState New York Agenda for
Economic Opportunity, which presented several strategies to push the region forward in the transition to
its next economy. (Attached as Exibit B.)
This seminal report found that many of the [CNY] firms that make up thermal and environmental
control systems trace their roots to the Carrier Corporation. The report further stated that these firms
specialized in areas relating to heating and cooling, water filtration, and commercial and residential control
systems. And, importantly, these fields are seeing significant growth and offer opportunities for the
region. Moreover, the report found that the Region Holds Strong Potential to Excel in New Technology
Fields, including: specializing in equipment to monitor and control energy use and environmental
quality. And, also, there is rising global demand and opportunity for thermal and environmental control
systems. Given the Regions abundance of water, the alignment of intellectual resources, and the existing
infrastructure, building a naturally chilled water system would be transformational.
As the feasibility report makes clear, Skaneateles Lake is both large and deep enough to provide a
reliable source of naturally chilled water. A new deep water intake structure would need to be built, but the
system could use existing city pipeline segments where appropriate and available. A heat exchange facility
a location for a device to transfer heat from one fluid to another would need to be built on existing
(Syracuse) Water Department property as well as a closed loop pipeline system. Potable water would be
pumped to existing City reservoirs after thermal harvesting.
This system would give Syracuse a competitive advantage by lowering utility costs and allowing the
same water to be sold twice once for potable use as is done now and also for cooling use. By replacing
2
mechanical chillers with less energy intensive and renewable sourced water, Syracuse could offer lower
utility costs, reduce strain on the electricity grid, and significantly reduce our carbon footprint.
At the same time the CNY Naturally Chilled Water Project is being built, the opportunity to rebuild the
aging water system should be seized. Since much of the same footprint and infrastructure would be utilized
or updated, it only makes sense to rebuild the water main system. Syracuse's water system is well over
100 years old. In previous years, water main breaks only occurred in the winter months with the shifting
of temperatures. This past summer, emergency crews were out every night for a three week period fixing
water breaks. What once was a seasonal repair is now becoming a year-round repair. We are on the pay
as it breaks approach. Utilizing a dig once philosophy, the mains would be replaced and updated to add
sensors to track usage, efficiency, and resiliency. The Syracuse water main system has 550 miles of main and
the industry standard for replacing mains in $1.32 million per mile, which includes labor, materials, and
restoration. Given the current age of the water main system and the disinvestment in infrastructure, these
pipes will all eventually have to be replaced.
training to our most underutilized assets our New Americans. (World Market Square was a Top 20 Finalist in
the Bloomberg Philanthropies Mayors Challenge in 2013. A copy of the proposal in attached as Exhibit D).
The project will be placed within our Northside neighborhood, an historic gateway for New Americans
from the original Germans and Italians to todays refugees and immigrants who come from more than 30
countries. A microcosm of Syracuse, the Northside struggles with poverty and blight but also has tremendous
assets - including a major hospital, historic businesses, and distinctive architecture. These are building-blocks
for the Northsides comeback, which is evident in new commercial investments and a slowly returning middle
class. Yet the Northsides greatest asset largely remains uncultivated: a diverse and dynamic population longing to
pursue their aspirations.
Our intention for World Market Square is to harness the energy of our community and unleash it into the
neighborhood and our City. A dynamic nexus of culture and opportunity, it will radically improve quality of
life on the Northside empowering residents, filling vacant storefronts, and restoring vitality to a once-great
urban district. The Square will be strategically located within a prominent site linking the Northside to St.
Josephs Hospital, Downtown Syracuse, and Interstate-81. The Squares anchor will be The Marketplace a large
indoor commercial space, featuring local products with a global influence (similar to Midtown Global Market
in Minneapolis), which will employ residents while allowing them to work towards their own entrepreneurial
ambitions. A resource center, featuring classrooms and program spaces, will be connected to The Marketplace.
Adjacent to these buildings, a plaza will serve as a community gathering place. A community-driven design
and planning process will ensure that World Market Square is a place that reflects the diverse identities of
neighborhood residents.
More than just physical places, these spaces will be animated by people and unique programming that
fosters community vitality. Opportunity Enterprises (OE) will offer three tracks designed to increase prosperity
and civic engagement among community residents. The Employment program places residents on career
paths within local industries by offering intensive industry training and work readiness. An expansion of
dramatically successful pilot programs (90% placement rate) in health care and construction, these employercustomized trainings will now be available in locally-expanding industries such as financial services, hospitality,
culinary, and advanced manufacturing.
Entrepreneurship programs will offer aspiring business owners the tools and resources they need while
insuring a steady income as they learn. To do this, we would create social enterprises, informed by rigorous
market research and planning and developed to offer products and services that are relevant to a broad audience
(a component inspired by Homeboy Industries in Los Angeles). Aspiring entrepreneurs will be employed in
these enterprises, while receiving hands-on management practicum. Outside the workday, they will partake in
a suite of services that include business planning, entrepreneurship training, mentorship/technical assistance,
financial counseling/credit building, and product innovation.
The Marketplace will feature both start-up businesses and notable regional businesses that come with
established customer bases. A suite of Empowerment programs will be integrated with Employment and
Entrepreneurial programs as well as offered to others in the community. Designed to enhance residents quality
of life and foster civic engagement, we will offer classes in homebuyer education, financial capacity building,
citizenship, and community leadership.
World Market Square will have a transformative impact on the City of Syracuse by empowering people,
10
enlivening place, and fostering possibilities. The idea has strengths within each of the overarching types of
innovation but is especially innovative as a New Program. The project represents a strategic integration
of people-centered and place-based development. When we invest in place without engaging and providing
opportunities for residents on the frontend, the result is either prolonged market weakness or gentrification.
Meanwhile, providing economic opportunities for low-income individuals, without addressing their
neighborhoods, results in people leaving for elsewhere once they can afford to do so. World Market Square
charts a different course by empowering Northside residents, economically and civically, and then creates
incentives for individuals to remain and invest in the neighborhood. This innovation will increase prosperity,
maintain diversity and draw visitors from the region and beyond, and it will inform strategies for achieving the
same dynamic in other neighborhoods, both in Syracuse and throughout the country.
11
12
to 231 Say Yes Syracuse families representing 442 children and 345 adults. In 2013, Say Yes Syracuse families
received legal assistance through housing court. This program benefitted 464 adults and 797 children facing
eviction, keeping them out of emergency housing and saving Onondaga County thousands of dollars per family.
Say Yes, the school district and Syracuse Teachers Association have developed after school and summer
programs intended to enhance academic success.
In 2013, more than 4,100 Syracuse City School District students participated in after school programs. Since
2009, Say Yes to Education, the SCSD, the STA and community-based organizations have provided summer
academic programs for 2,000-3,000 students per year with a focus on English Language Arts and Mathematics.
As a part of this program, approximately 200 college students, many of them Say Yes Scholars, work leading
activities in arts, crafts, music and sports.
Say Yes offers students in the Syracuse City School District free SAT Preparation classes. In the 2013-2014
school year, more than 450 students participated in the classes, which are held in collaboration with 100 Black
Men and are taught by tutors from Syracuse University.
Staff from Say Yes, with help from OnPoint for College, Hillside-Work Scholarship Connection and the
Financial Aid Counselor Network, provide support to students and families who need help completing the
FAFSA form for financial aid by offering FAFSA nights at area high schools. More than 500 students attended
these events in the 2013-2014 school year.
All of these programs are aimed at one goal to help Syracuse students graduate from high school and attend
college.
13
Exhibit A
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
Exhibit B
46
c e n t e r s tat e
N e w Yo r k
Agenda for
Economic
Opportunity
E x e c uti v e
M E T R O P O L I T A N
S ummar y
B U S I N E S S
P L A N
47
C e n t e r S tat e N e w Y o r k A g e n d a f o r E c o n o m i c O p p o r t u n i t y
A M e t r o p o l i ta n B u s i n e s s P l a n
p r e pa r e d i n c o l l a b o r at i o n w i t h
T h e B r o o k i n g s I n s t i t u t i o n M e t r o p o l i ta n P o l i c y P r o g r a m
N ov e m b e r 20 1 3
The generous financial support of the following regional partners made this project possible:
CenterState CEO
City of Syracuse
Onondaga County
Onondaga Civic Development Corporation
Syracuse University
Mohawk Valley EDGE
The Community Foundation of Herkimer and Oneida Counties, Inc.
Central New York Community Foundation, Inc.
National Grid
Welch Allyn
The Allyn Foundation
Seneca County IDA
Central New York Technology Development Organization
Operation Oswego County
The Gifford Foundation
Clarkson University | Cornell University | Syracuse University | the CNY Regional Planning and Development Board | the Syracuse
Center of Excellence | Onondaga County | the City of Syracuse | Saab Sensis Corporation | SUNY Environmental Science and
Forestry | Mohawk Valley Edge | Excellus BlueCross BlueShield | Tompkins County Area Development | Welch Allyn | KS & R |
M & T Bank | CNY Community Foundation | Bristol Myers Squibb | Bousquet Holstein PLLC | SUNY Upstate Medical University |
the Gifford Foundation | Cayuga Community College
48
c e n t e r s tat e
N e w Yo r k
Agenda for
Economic
Opportunity
A M e s s a g e f r o m t h e C e n t e r S tat e N e w Y o r k R e g i o n
ver the last decade, the CenterState region bore witness to manufacturing decline, the
Great Recession, and a long, sluggish recovery. These realities have created new competitive dynamics that now demand new interventions. The imperative we face is to carefully
craft strategies to transform our unique strengths into globally competitive assets.
The CenterState Agenda for Economic Opportunity responds to that imperative. Steeped
in extensive data analysis, it reflects more than two years of work. It drew from the engagement of hundreds of stakeholders across the region as well as national experts. Anchored in the commitment to grow
opportunity across the entire twelve-county region, together we designed a comprehensive, strategic
approach to make the most of our opportunities and address our challenges.
CenterState CEO convened leading institutions from the public, private, and non-profit sectors to guide
development of the Agenda for Economic Opportunity. A steering committee composed of representatives from business, government, philanthropy, and education worked in collaboration with the Brookings
Institution Metropolitan Policy Program and RW Ventures as part of a national pilot. Battelle Technology
Partnership Practice provided extensive assistance, along with KS&R, which expanded input from regional
stakeholders through an interactive on-line forum.
The work proceeded in tandem with the New York State Regional Economic Development Councils. It
drew extensively from the unprecedented public input and planning by the Central New York, Southern
Tier, North Country, Finger Lakes, and Mohawk Valley Regional Economic Development areas, all of which
include some counties in the region.
We are grateful to all of our partners for the time, resources, and insights they provided. But publication of the Agenda marks only a beginning as it inaugurates a new approach to economic development
and a new way of doing business centered on closer coordination and collaboration across the region. It is
intended as a living document that will grow and change as new partners become engaged and new opportunities and challenges arise.
It will only gain traction with the support of citizens and leaders, however. As a region, we must continue
to think through the value proposition we offer to the global market. We need the involvement of many
more citizens and organizations to carry out the strategies presented here and to expand their reach to
push the region forward in the transition to its next economy.
We invite you to join with us.
CENTERSTATE
n ew yo r k
ag e n da fo r
Eco n o m i c
o p p o rt u n i ty
1
49
Introduction
over the closing decades of the last century, eroding its traditional industrial base and economic vitality. For more than
economy.
BROOKINGS
M e t r o p o l i ta n
POLICY
PROGRAM
cost effectiveness.
2
50
th
th
CENTERSTATE
n ew yo r k
ag e n da fo r
Eco n o m i c
o p p o rt u n i ty
3
51
T h e C e n t e r S tat e R e g i o n L a g s t h e N at i o n i n M o s t C r i t i c a l
I n d i c at o r s o f E c o n o m i c P e r f o r m a n c e
1. Change in Economic Output, 2000-2012 compared to national average
25.0%
United States 19.7%
20.0%
15.0%
CenterState, NY 11.8%
10.0%
5.0%
0.0%
-5.0%
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
1.0%
0.0%
CenterState, NY -0.8%
-1.0%
-2.0%
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
$95
CenterState, NY $91.15
$90
$85
$80
$75
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
$45
BROOKINGS
M e t r o p o l i ta n
$40
CenterState, NY $39.66
$35
POLICY
PROGRAM
$30
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Source: Brookings analysis of Moodys Analytics, U.S. Census, and American Community Survey data
52
fundamental transformation is underway in the global economy, where knowledge assets centered in people and technology are prized and concentrated in metropolitan areas.
CENTERSTATE
n ew yo r k
ag e n da fo r
Eco n o m i c
o p p o rt u n i ty
5
53
that do not.
E s ta b l i s h i n g a N e w
C e n t e r o f G r av i t y
prosperity.
M e t r o p o l i ta n
POLICY
PROGRAM
6
54
growth.
Key Findings:
It identified new areas of strength and understanding of its competitive assets. It also crystallized points of weakness and challenges that
the region must confront in order to establish that new economic profile. The full market analysis that produced the Agenda for Economic
Opportunity can be read at www.centerstateopportunity.com
expanding markets for this potential global specialization in D2D technologies. Those sectors include
Key Finding:
The Region Holds Strong
Potential to Excel in New
Technology Fields
CENTERSTATE
n ew yo r k
ag e n da fo r
Eco n o m i c
o p p o rt u n i ty
This group of firms employs more than 9,000 workers, and overlaps with closely related sectors which
7
55
Environmental Products
rapidly evolving field of cybersecurity, working primarily with the U.S. Air Force Research Lab in Rome.
The challenge for those firms is to move beyond
and Clarkson whose faculties are leading regional
Key Finding:
The Growth in Global
Markets Can Boost the
Regions Exports and Global
Fluency
While many of the CenterState regions economic
these fields.
POLICY
PROGRAM
8
56
Entrepreneurial Networks
and Programs:
Syracuse Student Sandbox
Emerging Business Competition
Startup Weekend
Startup Labs
Grants for Growth
healthcare and engineering all represent areas for
Tech Garden
Syracuse Center of
Excellence
Key Finding:
T h e R e g i o n s I n n o va t i o n
Ecosyst e m I s St i l l
Emerging and Requires New
Investment
Key Finding:
T h e R e g i o n M u s t R e ta i n
a n d E x pa n d A S k i l l e d
Workforce to Grow Economic
Opportunity
economy.
CENTERSTATE
n ew yo r k
ag e n da fo r
Eco n o m i c
o p p o rt u n i ty
9
57
the country.
Key Finding:
T h e 2 1 st C e n t u r y R e q u i r e s
Modernizing Local
G ov e r n m e n t
10
58
CENTERSTATE
n ew yo r k
ag e n da fo r
Eco n o m i c
o p p o rt u n i ty
11
59
S t r at e g y 2 :
Strengthen the Regions
Position as a Leader in
Cyb e r s e c u r i t y, T h e r m a l
a n d E n v i r o n m e n ta l C o n t r o l
Sy s t e m s , a n d A g r i b u s i n e s s
The regions strong natural resources, 21st century
manufacturing sectors, and capacity for research and
technology development position it for growth but
require sustained focus on key tradable sectors. To
that end, the region will:
Accelerate the Growth of the Thermal and Environmental Control Systems Cluster, particularly
the regions small and medium-sized firms
Establish the Region as a Center for Cyberse-
S t r at e g y 1 :
E s ta b l i s h t h e R e g i o n a s a
G l o b a l C e n t e r f o r D ata t o
Decisions Firms, People, and
Ideas
The businesses that form the emerging D2D cluster
industries.
12
60
S t r at e g y 5 :
D e v e lo p E m p loy e r - D r i v e n
Approaches to Align
Workers and Jobs
Higher skills command higher wages and drive economic growth. Meeting the regions pressing need to
S t r at e g y 3 :
First steps:
S t r at e g y 4 :
Build Out a World Class
E c o s y s t e m f o r I n n o va t i o n
and Entrepreneurship
CENTERSTATE
n ew yo r k
ag e n da fo r
Eco n o m i c
o p p o rt u n i ty
13
61
S t r at e g y 6 :
S t r at e g y 7 :
C u lt i va t e O p p o r t u n i t y R i c h
Environments
The smaller metropolitan and rural areas that make
S t r at e g y 8 :
up the CenterState region require different approaches to create communities that attract the firms and
Develop a Government Modernization Commission for Onondaga County viewing it as a pilot for
other counties
Support Regional Economic Development Councils as powerful drivers of economic development
Support Citizen-Driven Solutions by making government data publicly available and encouraging
BROOKINGS
M e t r o p o l i ta n
POLICY
PROGRAM
14
62
map for the region to adopt a shared vision for the fu-
its work.
The expectation is that the Alliances impact will
ucts clusters.
stage firms.
Establish a Government
Modernization Commission
www.centerstateopportunity.com.
CENTERSTATE
n ew yo r k
ag e n da fo r
Eco n o m i c
research.
o p p o rt u n i ty
15
63
A Call to Action
underway, expanding the reach of collaborative action, and undertaking significant new initiatives to change the regions economic path.
Working together, its leaders and key institutions can redefine the
BROOKINGS
M e t r o p o l i ta n
POLICY
PROGRAM
regions economic profile and establish a new center of gravity for the
next economy. n
16
64
C e n t e r S tat e N e w Y o r k A g e n d a f o r E c o n o m i c O p p o r t u n i t y
A M e t r o p o l i ta n B u s i n e s s P l a n
p r e pa r e d i n c o l l a b o r at i o n w i t h
T h e B r o o k i n g s I n s t i t u t i o n M e t r o p o l i ta n P o l i c y P r o g r a m
N ov e m b e r 20 1 3
CenterState CEO
City of Syracuse
Onondaga County
Onondaga Civic Development Corporation
Syracuse University
Mohawk Valley EDGE
The Community Foundation of Herkimer and Oneida Counties, Inc.
Central New York Community Foundation, Inc.
National Grid
Welch Allyn
The Allyn Foundation
Seneca County IDA
Central New York Technology Development Organization
Operation Oswego County
The Gifford Foundation
F o r M o r e I n f o r m at i o n
David Mankiewicz
Senior Vice President Infrastructure and Urban initiatives
CenterState CEO
dmankiewicz@centerstateceo.com
Clarkson University | Cornell University | Syracuse University | the CNY Regional Planning and Development Board | the Syracuse
Center of Excellence | Onondaga County | the City of Syracuse | Saab Sensis Corporation | SUNY Environmental Science and
Forestry | Mohawk Valley Edge | Excellus BlueCross BlueShield | Tompkins County Area Development | Welch Allyn | KS & R |
M & T Bank | CNY Community Foundation | Bristol Myers Squibb | Bousquet Holstein PLLC | SUNY Upstate Medical University |
the Gifford Foundation | Cayuga Community College
65
Ab o u t t h e B r o o k i n g s Rockefeller Project on
s tat e a n d m e t r o p o l i ta n
i n n o va t i o n
This is part of a series of papers being produced
by the Brookings-Rockefeller Project on State and
Metropolitan Innovation.
States and metropolitan areas will be the hubs of
policy innovation in the United States, and the places
that lay the groundwork for the next economy.
The project will present fiscally responsible ideas
state leaders can use to create an economy that is
driven by exports, powered by low carbon, fueled
by innovation, rich with opportunity, and led by
metropolitan areas.
Acknowledgments
The Brookings Metropolitan Policy Program thanks
the Rockefeller Foundation for support of this work.
Brookings
1775 Massachusetts Avenue, NW
telephone 202.797.6000
fax 202.797.6004
telephone 202.797.6139
fax 202.797.2965
web site brookings.edu/metro
66
67
Exhibit C
68
Draft
Conducted by:
ValleyNet Inc.
415 Waterman Rd
Royalton, VT 05068
69
Table of Contents
1.
Overview
2.
The Project
3.
Business Plan
4.
10
5.
13
6.
Financing
15
7.
18
8.
19
9.
Conclusion
20
Attachments:
A. Capital Expenditure Budget
21
B. Financial Highlights
22
C. Network Map
23
D. Network Diagram
24
70
Overview
This document responds to a request by Syracuse MetroNet and the Syracuse Community Broadband
Initiative (SCBI) for a preliminary analysis of the feasibility (technical, financial and operational) of a
community owned and operated telecommunications network that will serve the City of Syracuse, NY.
The analysis outlines a project concept that the authors believe is consistent with the objectives of the
project sponsors (MetroNet and SCBI) and includes a baseline business and financial analysis of the
viability of such a project. The project concept is to build and operate a community-owned and
operated Fiber-to-the-Premise (FTTP)1 network reaching all of the City of Syracuse that is not already
served by existing FTTP networks. The analysis presented in this paper is based on conservative
assumptions about the principal parameters and a corporate structure that builds upon that of the
existing MetroNet and the SCBI. The paper concludes that from a technical, financial and business
perspective the proposed project is strongly viable in principle. Actual performance will depend more
on the soft questions of corporate organization and governance, the quality of management and
oversight, etc. The authors believe that these issues are likely to present the greatest challenge and to
have the greatest impact on outcome.
A. Project Purpose
Local telecommunications infrastructure is crucial to the social, economic, and democratic health of
our community. In the 21st century and beyond telecommunications infrastructure is equal in
importance to public roads, water, power and other utility services. As technology progresses and the
diversity of telecommunications services grow, the importance of the quality of the telecommunication
network will also grow. As with other basic infrastructure and utilities it is becoming increasingly
clear that local communitiesespecially those that do not lie in the major metropolitan areascannot
rely on private corporations to build, expand and update telecommunications infrastructure in a manner
that is optimal for the well-being of the communities themselves. Faced with this fact, more and more
communities are concluding that telecommunications infrastructure must be provided in the context of
a public utilitypossibly one owned by community institutions. This bridge has been crossed many
times before: water, fire, schools, public transport and even electricity were once the exclusive
province of private enterprise. Over long periods of time, however, it became clear that such vital
common good could often be better provided by local community entities. This is not universal: many
local governments choose to provide these services but in other places they are provided by private
companies. However, the fact that there are numerous public providers has provided a powerful and
effective check on the behavior of private monopolies (and vice versa). Diversity and competition
impose discipline on all players. Such competitive discipline is increasingly necessary in the US
telecommunication markets because the utility structure that once existed in the sector has eroded badly
(where it still applies) and, more importantly, has not been extended to the rapidly growing nontraditional areas such as Internet, cable TV etc. This erosion of public utility discipline is unusual in
the extent and degree that has occurred in the USA compared to other industrialized countries. This is
one of the reasons why the US is falling behind other industrialized (and some middle-income)
countries in the quality and availability of the most modern telecommunications. This is to be
1
The following terms are considered to be functionally equivalent: Fiber-to-the-Premise (FTTP), Fiber-to-theHome (FTTH), Fiber-to-Anywhere (FTTX). FTTP is used in this report but any of the others could be used
interchangeably.
71
expected: deregulated private for-profit companies have never been good at providing critical services
which exhibit public utility characteristics.
As the public utility framework for telecommunications has eroded in the USA, services in those
regions and communities which are not considered sufficiently profitable and attractive by deregulated
providers, have stagnated and declined the most relative to their more fortunate neighbors. This is
having palpable and damaging consequences for the prosperity and vitality of the affected
communities. In the face of this processand of Federal and (often) State indifference to it--more and
more local communities are deciding to take matters into their own hands.
As a result, local community participation in telecommunicationsespecially the new segments of
the sector--is established and growing throughout America. There are, of course, wide differences in
the degree and form such participation takes. But even where private companies remain dominant, the
fact that a public option is available and proven creates a degree of competitive discipline over private
companies which is salutary from the perspective of consumers and communities. Competition by
potential entry is as effective when the entrant is a possible community entity as it is when the entrant
is another private companyand, in the utility field, probably more so. Local community
involvement in telecommunications is growing precisely because telecommunications is becoming so
important and because US private providers are failing to keep pace with the needs of communities.
72
experiences, in school and at home, made possible by an inexpensive and ubiquitous high-speed
network
More Efficient Government Ability for local government, police, fire, and EMT to adopt new and
low- cost telecommunication solutions due to the state-of-the-art infrastructure and technology
convergence opportunities it provides
Richer Cultural Development More local TV programming, greater exposure to local cultural
events, and low-cost TV ads to promote local events
Accelerated Economic Development Other small and medium sized cities that have built
community FTTH networks (e.g. Chattanooga, TN; Lafayette, LA; Bristol, VA) have seen their
networks attract new businesses and entrepreneurs seeking low-cost, very high-speed broadband
services. Syracuse can expect the same benefits, i.e., local jobs for S-Net services, localized network
revenue for additional job stimulus, ultra-high-speed network infrastructure or research in high
bandwidth community applications and other network hardware and software productsa major new
asset for local universities (research) and hospitals (telemedicine development)
Underpin MetroNet and its members A long-term solution to replace MetroNets expiring low-cost
network services; and new freedom for MetroNet to add new members at low rates, or change service
locations without forfeiting its low ratesas is the case today.
Beyond these specific benefits, Syracuse stands to gain significant intangible benefits. For example, the
lower prices could save the community $5$10 million, and eventually $20$30 million, per year,
which, as effectively new disposable income, the new spending would stimulate 400600 new jobs
locally. Also, the national publicity gained by creating a city-wide community owned Gigabit network
will give Syracuse the reputation of a modern and progressive and technology savvy city, and will
surely help attract people and businesses to Syracuse and its suburbs.
The Project
In order to test feasibility, it is necessary to specify the hypothetical project to be tested. For this
purpose, we have created a proposed project based on the meetings and discussions with MetroNet,
SCBI and other parties in Syracuse that we have met through these two primary sponsors. Based on
these meetings and our experience elsewhere, we have created a project proposal that consists of
building and operating a state-of-the-art last-mile optical fiber telecommunications network, from here
on referred to as "S-Net" (for Syracuse Fiber Network). S-Net would provide the standard
compliment of retail services for residents and small businesses: TV, Internet, phone, and related
services. In addition, S-Net will provide extra high-speed (Gigabit per second - Gb/s) connections and
dedicated circuits as may be required by local government, institutions, and major businesses. Finally,
S-Net will be an Open Access network which permits and welcomes other providers of services of all
kinds to use its fiber system to reach customersincluding services that compete with S-Nets own
final services. Third party service providers will be charged for the use of the network on a nondiscriminatory basis which enables them to compete fairly with S-Nets own services while still
ensuring that S-Nets infrastructure costs are covered. Security services, medical monitoring,
73
education, smart-home energy management etc are some examples of services that S-Net may not
offer itself but will welcome others to offer over its network.
The overall vision of the project is to build a city-wide network passing all households, businesses and
institutions. However, Phase 1 of the project--whose feasibility is being tested heredoes not attempt
to cover the entire city immediately. Instead, Phase I consists of two parts:
a) A local Fiber-to-the-Premise (FTTP) network covering approximately 34% of Syracuse with the
priority given to areas not currently served by other fiber networks. Further expansion would
continue based on logistics, demand and financing. Given time, Phase I it is expected that S-Net
would generate enough internal surplus cash flow to finance expansion covering the entire city;
however, this feasibility test contemplates it growing only to the point where it covers the
approximately 75% of the City which is not served by another FTTP network. Whether or not to
expand beyond is a decision left to the future.
The technology proposed for the initial deployment, Gigabit Passive Optical Network (G-PON),
would provide 100 Mb/s down and 50Mb/s up connectivity to every subscriber passed by the
network who wishes to connect to the network. However, this can be upgraded easily and
efficiently to Gigabit service when demand so justifies. In the meantime, Gigabit service can be
provided on a customized basis to anyone who wishes it.
b) An "institutional network" (I-Net) to serve the members of MetroNet, which includes local
government, school district, hospitals, colleges, and several non-profits. This network can be
provided as a VLAN (as exists now) or as dedicated circuits to each user for maximum
flexibility to choose the form of connectivity delivered (e.g. dark fiber, Gigabit Ethernet etc),
The enterprise services described for the I-Net will also be available to business customers who
may require them and have sufficient in-house capability to manage high capacity connectivity
for their own purposes. Ultra-high Gigabit service will be obtainable throughout the network.
S-Net is the name given to the two portions of the network (I-Net and FTTP) combined.
74
Network Extent
The model is based on the estimates that the combined Phase I network will involve 150 miles of cable,
of which an estimated 135 will be aerial and 15 will be underground. This cable will pass
approximately 20,600 households (including those living in both single and multi-family dwellings)
and 1,780 business/institutions.
Services
S-Net is planned as a full-service provider and intends to offer: a) basic connectivity of various forms to
final customers; b) the normal menu of retail triple-play services (TV, Internet, and phone) and related
services and features; and, c) transport capability to other service providers on a non-discriminatory
basis. Other services, such as specialized business telephony, video-conferencing, home/building
security, smart home, gaming services, distance education, telemedicine etc., will also be provided, but
may come from third parties who contract to use S-Net to deliver their services or by S-Net itself, or
both.
Independent service providers who wish to utilize S-Net to access customerseither for services not
offered by S-Net itself or in competition with S-Nets core offerings--will be welcome. Pricing for
access to the underlying transport capability of S-Net by third party providers will be on a nondiscriminatory, cost-determined basis.
Institutional Network
I-Net, the institutional component of the S-Net, would offer pure connectivity as desired by the
customer; e.g.: dark fiber, Ethernet connectivity of any desired speed, traditional circuits (T-1, DS3,
etc). It would also offer retail services if desired (e.g. TV, Internet access, and phone, etc.) However,
S-Net is not envisioned to necessarily be a provider of a full line of business services on its own
account. Rather, for complex business service needs, it is assumed that institutional customers may
prefer a combination of self provisioning and specialized third party providers whose services would be
delivered over either the I-Net or the FTTP final-mile distribution system.
75
S-Net would be designed and intended to be financially self-supporting: i.e. no subsidies or financial
support are needed or envisioned from the City or the taxpayers of Syracuse. As such, pricing would
be set on a commercial basis and designed to cover all costs and to yield a modest surplus determined
by the desire to fund: i) further network expansion; ii) network related community services and
resources; or, iii) other community- determined purposes. Because of the greatly superior capacity and
economic performance of fiber networks, plus the cost savings associated with non-profit operation,
prices are expected to be lower than other operators in the service territory currently charge for
comparable services. However, it is quite possible that other service providers will lower their prices
when faced by competition by S-Net. If this occurs, the consequent reduction in monopoly rents
currently being reaped by incumbent carriers will be one of the benefits that the community at large
gains from the project, all thanks to the existence of S-Net
Open Access
S-Net will be an open access provider. This means that, while offering retail services itself, it will
also make the network available to any other service provider on a non-discriminatory basis. To this
end, S-Net will unbundle different components of its services in a manner designed to be both: a)
transparent; and, b) to recover all costs for each element from the prices charged for that element. For
example, voice and video service to residents will contain two elements: i) the cost of the access pipe
required to deliver the service; and, ii) the cost of the voice and video services themselves, net of the
underlying transport pipe.
The prices will be set such that each covers its own costs. As a result, should a customer (or another
video provider) wish to utilize S-Net to access alternative video services they could do so by
purchasing the access pipe only without being at an unfair competitive disadvantage to S-Nets own
video services.
Universal Access
S-Net will initially be built-out to cover approximately 34% of the City, with simultaneous emphasis on
reaching all MetroNet members, serving all residential and business customers passed by the network
that serves MetroNet members, and reaching out to additional neighborhoods that have neither current
access to fiber connectivity nor lie on the fiber routes that reach MetroNet members. Within the
targeted service area, the network will provide universal service. As the network matures, It is expected
to expand throughout the rest of the city.
76
million, including a 7% contingency. The resulting network of 150 cable miles is estimated to pass
just under 21,700 residential, business and institutional potential subscribers. Assuming a conservative
take rate of 25% by the end of 2014, this gives an average of approximately $1,400 per passing and
$5,722 per connected customer as of the end of the 2014. These measures will decline thereafter as
more customers are connected to the Phase I network and (if/when) the network is extended beyond the
initial 150 miles. By 2017, for instance, it is projected that approximately 7,200 customers will have
been connected and the CapEx per customer will be approximately $5,000
The major components of CapEx are (not including 7% contingency):
a. Fiber infrastructure: The complete cost of fiber construction for Phase I (i.e. 110 miles of
combined I-Net and FTTH plus another 40 miles of FTTH only, including design, pole makeready, trenching and boring, all material, etc) passing approximately 21,700 subscribers of all
types is estimated to be about $11.3 million .
b. Electronics: Central Office (CO) switches, routers and servers to support connectivity and
deliver Internet and voice telephony is estimated to cost approximately $1 mm. The G-PON
access system including equipment in the CO and remote hubs and at the customer premises is
estimated to cost approximately $500 per customeror $2.7 mm for 5,400 subscribers expected
to be connected by the end of 2014.
c) Video: A video head-end and associated satellite receivers would cost approximately $2.4
mm. Obtaining and paying for video content contracts is costly and time-consuming. Monthly
payments for video content are high and rising. Given the uncertain future of the cable industry
and video services in general, serious consideration should be given to making an arrangement
with an existing video provider somewhere in the region to supply video content under that
carriers own brand in return for a negotiated monthly fee per customer. However, the capital and
operating costs of providing video services under S-Nets own brand are included in the financial
analysis because it may be necessary to provide these services directly.
c) Customer connection: In Phase I, 5,400 customers are expected to be connected at a cost of
$4.1 mm
d) Buildings: It is assumed that a combined headquarters and central office space can be
acquired for $2.25 mm and that $500,000 will be required to adapt it to
S-Net purposes. Another $600,000 is budgeted for remote, un-manned hubs located around the
city as needed.
e) Other: Vehicles, various computers, software, tools and other miscellaneous items are
expected to cost approximately $260,000.
Operating Costs
Key elements of operating cost include:
77
a. Cost of Goods/Services Sold (COGS): Cost of voice telephone related services (trunking, carrier
access, etc.), video services and Internet bandwidth are conservatively estimated to equal an
average of $28-30/month/subscriber or 18-20 % of gross revenues. Gross margin (Gross Revenues
minus GOGS) is expected to be in 2014 at 80% and to grow slowly thereafter.
b. Labor: Number of FTE employees of various skills per 1000 subscribers are assumed to parallel
other similar networks - declining from a high of 13 in the early start-up phase to a stable ratio of
just under 5. Wage rates are taken from similar municipal/community owned networks in the North
East. Senior managers will be expected and required to take an agreed portion (5%?) of their
compensation in the form of deferred subordinated debt during the first years of operation until the
network achieves positive cash flow.
c. Pole attachment fees/rental : Assumed to equal $17/pole per annum. This fee per pole is
characteristic of NE utility charges but since these vary considerably from jurisdiction to
jurisdiction, this parameter needs further verification.
d. Debt service: $40 million of debt @ 7.0% for 25 years with a one year payment holiday in the
first year and full interest and amortization over the following 24 years. Included in the borrowed
amount is a Debt Service Reserve equal to 10% of the principal amount. A key element in
obtaining the debt will be a pledge by MetroNet members to purchase a collective minimum of $2
million of services from S-Net. This constitutes approximately 50% of their estimated current
combined telecom purchases.
e. Taxes: The network would be exempt from most taxes but would make payments in lieu of taxes
(PILOT) to the City.
d. Other: Power, insurance, vehicle operations, professional services (including legal) etc. are
presumed to parallel other similar networks. A fee to the design/build/operate (DBO) contractor of
$20 per year for every paying customer connected at the end of the year is assumed. A contingency
allowance of 5% is assumed for the total of operating costs.
Revenues
Key elements of revenue projections include:
a. Take Rate: Take rate is the % of potential subscribers (households, businesses, institutions etc)
passed by the network who actually subscribe and become paying customers. For S-Net, residential
and small business take rates are assumed to parallel the low end of normal experience in other
municipal/community networks in the USA. This assumption has been chosen not because we
expect this to actually be the case but to ensure that the financial model has sufficient cushion to
assure potential lenders that the business model can sustain any adverse development that can
reasonably be anticipated. The model projects that 26% of passed residences and 12% of passed
businesses will have subscribed by the end of the second year, rising to 34% and 24% respectively
by 2017. These percentages are well below actual take rates in similar networks. Should actual
78
experience be closer to other networks, financial performance will be proportionately better than the
model predicts. MetroNet members, including the City, are assumed to subscribe to their
committed rate as soon as it is available.
b. Average Revenue Per User (ARPU): Pricing and service packaging would be aimed to yield
Average Revenue Per (connected) User at approximately 5% -10% below current prices for
comparable services. Revenue from the City and MetroNet is estimated based on existing
expenditures and pricingi.e. level pricing of existing services.
79
stable, the Governing Board may wish to consider transferring operating authority to its own
operational entity. (With this in mind, any contract with a third party should clearly specify the duration
and transition mechanisms that would be followed.)
H. In the meantime, the DBO contractor should be given clear authority to construct and operate the
network within the policy guidelines spelled out by the corporate Charter and the Governing Board and
Executive Committee. The latter should not benor try to bethe day-to-day managers of the
network. By the same token, the operator must not be allowed to undermine or pervert the basic
purposes and policies of S-Net Governing Board and Executive Committee.]
80
Financing
The initial project outline that was developed for the purposes of this preliminary feasibility study
estimates that a total of $37.5 mm of outside financing will be required to build and operate S-Net to
the point where it achieves positive cash-flow and is able to sustain itself entirely. Of this sum, $1
million is assumed to be loaned or granted to the project by local institutions, foundations, or other
community members to fund initial operations, and the remaining $36.5 million in a single offering
approximately 4 6 months later. (If it is feasible to break the latter sum down into phased financing,
or a single financing with phased draw-downs, this would be advantageous. However, for the financial
modeling exercise, it is assumed that the financing must be taken at one time.) Financing is assumed to
be available at of 7% per annum for 25 year maturity with a 3 year interest-only holiday at the
beginning followed by 22 years of full Principal and Interest amortization which extinguishes the
liability at the end. For financial modeling purposes payments are assumed to be annual in arrears.
Better terms may well be available, but assuming conservative terms is a safer and better test of overall
feasibility of the project.
Two key credit enhancements are envisaged: a) a pledge by local major institutions to purchase a total
of at least $2 mm of services from the network (approximately equal to one half of their current
telecom expenditures) providing the network is able to provide comparable or superior services to what
they are now receiving at comparable prices; and, b) creation of a Debt Service Reserve equal to 10%
of the borrowed amount. These terms are believed to be achievable without tax-exempt status for the
debt. If the latter proves possible, better terms may be available. The vehicle is presumed to be either
publicly or privately placed bonds or Certificates of Participation (COPs) in a capital lease. Senior
managers would be required to take a portion (5% - 10%) of their compensation in the form of
subordinated debt until positive cash flow is achieved. Debt would be secured by: a) the assets and
revenues of the network itself; and b) contracts with the City and the MetroNet members for S-Net
services. Bank loans, subscriber pre-payments, mortgage(s) for key property, vendor financing and
other forms of financing should also be considered for appropriate components of Capital Expenditure.
These could complement a bond or COPs offering.
Another option currently being developed by SCBI is a form of crowd-sourcing, i.e., local financing by
those who stand to benefit directly from the investment. Specifically, the concept is to sell S-Net
Service Bonds to local residents and businesses. The ECFiber project in Vermont has demonstrated the
viability of such a mechanism as one part of an overall financing plan.
The preliminary estimate for the financing needs of the total network is $37,500,000. Of this amount,
approximately $1,000,000 is for pre-financing and initial start-up costs (preliminary design, detailed
business plan development, market analysis, legal costs, pole attachment license applications etc. and
$36,500,000 is for network construction, initial operating losses, and Debt Service Reserve. It would
be desirable to raise this initial seed money from MetroNet memberspreferably on terms similar to
those outlined above but which places this debt in a subordinate position to the main debt. The most
efficient financing structure would be to issue the required debt in a series of tranches over several
years. However, this may not be practical and, therefore, the modeling has been done on the
assumption that it is all raised at one time.
81
The most likely scenario for financing the network is to access the capital markets through the issuance
of revenue bonds that pledge all revenues generated by the network. Depending on the ownership
structure of the network, long-term, lower-interest tax exempt bonds may be available. At this time, the
capital markets are very risk adverse and will perceive a start-up telecommunications utility as a risky
investment. Consequently, it will probably be necessary to obtain some type of financial/credit support
from major local institutions to obtain financing from the capital markets. This type of credit support
can come in a number of forms, or combinations of forms, depending on participants' preferences. The
most common types of credit support include:
1. Partial letter of credit. Participants can purchase a letter of credit from a rated bank that
guarantees a portion of the bond issue. The size of the letter of credit would be negotiated with
the investment banking firm selling the bonds after a detailed business plan has been developed.
2. Debt service reserve. Participants can deposit funds into a debt service reserve that is available
to draw upon if network revenues are insufficient to make the revenue bond payments. Typical
debt service reserves are for an amount necessary to make bond payments for 1-2 years or 10%
of the principal amount. The model assumes the latter, giving a DSR of $3.9 million. This is
likely to be a requirement of potential lenders.
3. Minimum purchase. Participants can guarantee a minimum level of telecommunication services
that they will purchase from the network owners. The amount of services that are purchased, or
the rates associated with the services, can be adjusted downward if revenues from other
customers are sufficient. This, in ValleyNets view, is the preferred option and may (together
with a Debt Service Reserve) be sufficient to attract debt on adequate terms.
4. Equity. S-Net can seek grants or subordinated loans that can reduce the volume of revenue
bonds necessary to fund the project. Donors/lenders could include members of the 501(c)12 coop if that is the organizational form that is chosen. Also, to the extent that the initial seed loan of
$1 million, crowd-sourcing loans, or other debt elements in the financing structure can be
subordinated to the main offering, these can function as equity from the perspective of the
main lender(s). However, any such arrangement must be carefully written so as not to
undermine S-Nets status as a non-profit entity for tax purposes. For modeling purposes,
ValleyNet has not assumed any equity financing. However, the $1 million suggested initial
investment in subordinated debt would function as a form of quasi-equity from the
perspective of potential lenders.
Major local institutions represent a wide range of institutions and sizes and may have different
preferences when faced with decisions on lending and service commitments. Minimum purchase
decisions are normally made by the departments that purchase telecommunication services.
Investment/lending decisions may be made by institutional financial managers, endowment portfolio
managers or outside advisers. Ultimately, a combination of the above alternatives may be the best way
to accommodate individual institutional needs.
Future Growth
The financing plan and financial model are keyed to Phase I only. This would cover 34% of the City.
Phase I is projected to achieve positive operating cash flow in the third year and overall positive cash
82
flow (including required capital expenditures) in the fifth year. Thereafter, it is expected to generate
increasing amounts of net cash surplus. This could be used to finance expansion of the network.
However, if S-Net should decide to expand the network to more of the City, and if S-Net performs as
expected, it is likely that they would be able to raise additional capital to do so beginning sometime
around the fourth year.
83
e. Engineering Services: A contract with an engineering firm for the preliminary and construction
level engineering will need to be executed.
f. Network Construction: A contract with a network construction firm will need to be developed.
This may include the network electronics components, which could also be bid out separately.
84
Conclusion
The creation of a community owned FTTP telecommunications utility is a bold step. But Syracuse
would not be the first to do it. Dozens of communities have done it with great success. Lafayette, LA,
and Chattanooga, TN are two cities of comparable size to Syracuse that have built successful
community FTTP networks and are now enjoying the fruits of that effort. While there have been a few
stumbles, the vast majority have succeeded--many after having to overcome major political opposition
from entrenched special interests. These communities fought for their public interest and won.
While by no means easy, S-Net should face an easier road than some other municipal or community
FTTP projects. First, Syracuse can draw on the experience of these other networks (and should make
an organized effort to do so). Second, FTTP technology has progressed rapidly so that today it is well
established, well known and almost off the shelf level of stability in both techniques and prices.
Third, Syracuse is a comparatively large and dense city most of whose telecommunications is aerial on
poles. As such, it faces and lower costs than localities where either is not the case. Fourth, the
existence of a large group of non-profit entities with substantial technical capability, large
communications needs and expenditures, public interest orientation and a history of working together is
a substantial advantage for a start-up of this sort.
The economic development effects of state-of-the-art, low-cost, ultra-high speed and reliable
broadband is potentially dramaticand has been shown to be so by comparable cities that have already
paved the way down this road. , The opportunity to significantly enhance Syracuses schools, cultural
vitality, and the local medical, high-tech, and research industries is enormous. Finally, the national
attention Syracuse will gain as a modern and progressive and technology-savvy cityjoining pioneers
like Lafayette, LA, Chattanooga, TN and Kansas City, KS - will have the single most important
economic development impact: attracting dynamic people and businesses to Syracuse.
The proposed approach to providing telecommunications services demonstrates a fundamental
distinction between community-owned networks and privately owned for-profit networks. For-profit
networks are required by their investors to provide the least services at the highest cost to its customers
using the lowest capital investment in order to maximize profits. Community-owned networks provide
the greatest achievable level of services at the lowest possible cost to its users operating in a fiscally
responsible manner.
That a universal, low cost FTTP network has a dynamic effect on a community is well-known. The
question usually is, however, is there a feasible way to create such an infrastructureespecially in the
face of reluctance to do so by a Citys main telecom providers. We believe that the analysis presented
in this report strongly suggests that the answer for Syracuse is Yes.
85
Attachment A
Capital Expenditure Budget
$3,707,248
$2,550,000
$5,492,108
$1,032,110
Fiber Infrastructure
$11,383,530
$3,350,000
$260,000
$40,000
Subtotal Capex
$27,814,996
Contingency (7%)
$1,947,050
$29,762,046
$3.650,000
Financing Costs
$547,500
$3,540,454
$37.500,000
86
Attachment B
Financial Highlights
Year
Homes
Passed
5,321
19,954
19,954
19,954
19,954
Homes
Connected
1,064
5,188
5,587
5,986
6,186
Businesses
passed
459
1,720
1,720
1,720
1,720
Business
Connected
46
206
241
275
310
Take Rate
(yr end)
19.2%
24.9%
26.9%
28.9%
30.0%
$1,211,632
$6,449,197
$9,683,662
$10,415,238
$11,019,471
$84,367
$1,150,671
$1,910,451
$2,017,614
$2,091,135
-$1,237,087
$2,241,732
$4,605,054
$4,999,243
$5,417,582
$101,852
$2,656,252
$2,656,252
$3,401,663
N/A
0.84
1.73
1.88
1.59
$16,721,520
$1,394,858
$665,984
$374,502
$895,270
Total
Revenue
COGS
EBITDA
Debt
Service
Debt
Coverage
Ending
Cash
$2,656,252
87
Attachment C
Network Map
88
Attachment D
Network Diagram
89
Exhibit D
90
Syracuse, NY
91
Mayors Challenge
Syracuse, NY
Executive Summary
The One-Liner:
Syracuse will establish an identity as an international city by designing the blueprint by which to
harness the talents and energies of New Americans, showcase diversity, and transform distressed
neighborhoods
The Elevator Pitch:
Syracuse was once renowned as a great American city a place for invention and production,
where New Americans, beginning with European immigrants, helped to make our neighborhoods
incredible places to live. But our city declined as industries left and our population moved to the
suburbs. Today, we struggle with poverty and blight. But a new energy in Syracuse is palpable
on the Northside, where new creators are arriving from across the world and making the city
their home. Our challenge is to harness this energy and potential to lift up the whole community.
Our idea is to create the World Market Square: A hub of activity and unique cultural experience,
created by transforming a once-blighted intersection. The Square will feature (1) a marketplace,
showcasing local goods with a global influence, and employing and empowering neighborhood
residents; (2) plaza for community gatherings, celebrations and recreation; and (3) a resource
center that offers and unites innovative business development programs, workforce training, and
other services that help residents transition from just surviving to thriving.
The Square and its core initiatives reflect three interlocking components. People: Syracuse's
Northside neighborhood is a gateway for refugees and other immigrants to our community.
World Market Square will serve as a beacon of opportunity. Place: World Market Square will
concentrate programmatic and physical investments, maximizing outcomes, and acting as a focal
point of cultural exchange. Possibility: World Market Square synthesizes programmatic service
provision, neighborhood revitalization, and, both physically and socially, strategic economic
development in a way that is nationally unique. The Square will attract visitors and investment to
the Northside, and its programs will drive community-led economic growth into the surrounding
area filling vacant storefronts and homes and restoring vitality to a historic urban district.
Evolution:
While our core vision, goals and innovation have remained the same, the Word Market Square
has evolved significantly over the last four months. From original application submission to
Ideas Camp to our coaching calls to our in-depth community dialogue process, our innovation
has been refined, tightened, and strengthened, and our vision is clearer than ever. The physical
aspect of the Square has begun to take shape with schematic plans on the board and property
development opportunities coming into focus. Our partnerships have been further galvanized,
with collaborating organizations coalescing around the World Market Square concept and
proposed activities. Our friends in the refugee and immigrant communities are validating our
collective sense of heightened momentum, and are poised to embrace the new opportunities the
World Market Square presents.
1
92
Mayors Challenge
Syracuse, NY
While the fundamental pillars of the World Market Square have crystalized, we have also
substantially modified and improved the way in which we articulate them. Both Ideas Camp and
subsequent coaching calls have helped us to understand the necessity of conveying our
innovation in a way that is digestible for a wide range of audiences, and in a way that will
resonate for those who stand to benefit from experiencing the Square itself. This truly has been a
challenge for us, as the problems we aim to solve -- and the strategies we propose in order to
solve them are highly nuanced and multidimensional. The various elements of the innovation
build upon one another, with interactions and feedback loops in outcomes and impacts that are
critical to the innovation itself, and that posit a highly complex network of interwoven
programmatic threads. Within the complexity of this vision, we have been challenged repeatedly
to articulate clearly and explicitly our innovation, its identifiable components, and the activities
to be undertaken within each component. This has been an incredibly enriching process, and one
that, though sometimes exhausting, has enabled us to forge a more legible project. Our improved
ability to communicate about this initiative and its essential components will be powerful as we
continue to generate new resources, galvanize community support, and build support from our
partner organizations.
There is no question that the World Market Square will continue to evolve. Indeed, this
evolution is inherent to the success of the initiative itself. The importance of neighborhood
residents refugees, immigrants, long-time residents and business owners in crafting and
driving this innovation cannot be overstated.
93
Mayors Challenge
Syracuse, NY
Vision
Syracuse, New York, like most post-industrial cities, was battered by deindustrialization
and suburbanization in the late 20th century. After losing over a third of its population (220,000
residents in 1950, compared to 147,000 in 2010) and many major employers, the city faces urban
blight (e.g. 1900 vacant buildings) and poverty (32% poverty rate). As of the 2010 Census,
however, Syracuses population had begun to stabilize, largely due to an influx of New
Americans, particularly the 8,000 refugees who have been resettled here since 2001. Our New
American populations bring vitality and hope, but they also face intense challenges (over 50%
live below the poverty line). Yet New Americans often thrive when given tools and
opportunities, while their children commonly excel in city schools. Translating this potential into
a force for long-term change is a defining challenge for Syracuse in the 21st Century.
World Market Square will be the most robust, visible and catalytic response to this
community challenge to date. The project will be placed within our Northside neighborhood,
an historic gateway for New Americans from the original Germans and Italians to todays
refugees and immigrants who come from more than 30 countries. A microcosm of Syracuse, the
Northside struggles with poverty and blight but also has tremendous assets - including a major
hospital, historic businesses, and distinctive architecture. These are building-blocks for the
Northsides comeback, which is evident in new commercial investments and a slowly returning
middle class. Yet the Northsides greatest asset largely remains uncultivated: a diverse and
dynamic population longing to pursue their aspirations. Imagine what would happen if we
harnessed the energy of our community and unleashed it into the neighborhood.
This is our intention for World Market Square. A dynamic nexus of culture and
opportunity, it will radically improve quality of life on the Northside empowering residents,
filling vacant storefronts, and restoring vitality to a once-great urban district. A vacant
intersection will become a hub of opportunity for Northside residents and a unique cultural
destination for the broader Syracuse community. The Square will be strategically located within
a prominent site linking the Northside to St. Josephs Hospital, Downtown Syracuse, and
Interstate-81. The Squares anchor will be The Marketplace - a large indoor commercial space,
featuring local products with a global influence (similar to Midtown Global Market in
Minneapolis), which will employ residents while allowing them to work towards their own
entrepreneurial ambitions. A resource center, featuring classrooms and program spaces, will be
connected to the marketplace. Adjacent to these buildings, a plaza will serve as a community
gathering place. A community-driven design and planning process will ensure that World Market
Square is a place that reflects the diverse identities of neighborhood residents.
More than just physical places, these spaces will be animated by people and unique
programming that fosters community vitality. Opportunity Enterprises (OE) will offer three
tracks designed to increase prosperity and civic engagement among community residents. The
Employment program places residents on career paths within local industries by offering
intensive industry training and work readiness. An expansion of dramatically successful pilot
programs (90% placement rate) in health care and construction, these employer-customized
trainings will now be available in locally-expanding industries such as financial services,
hospitality, culinary, and advanced manufacturing.
Entrepreneurship programs will offer aspiring business owners the tools and resources
they need while insuring a steady income as they learn. To do this, we are creating social
enterprises, informed by rigorous market research and planning and developed to offer products
3
94
Mayors Challenge
Syracuse, NY
and services that are relevant to a broad audience (a component inspired by Homeboy Industries
in Los Angeles). Aspiring entrepreneurs will be employed in these enterprises, while receiving
hands-on management practicum. Outside the workday, they will partake in a suite of services
that include business planning, entrepreneurship training, mentorship/technical assistance,
financial counseling/credit building, and product innovation. The entrepreneurial training
curriculum will be an adaptation of Pro-Literacy and Interweave Solutions Self-Reliance
Model an entrepreneurial training program successfully implemented in developing countries.
Once our entre-ployees are ready to launch, they will be provided the financing and support
necessary to succeed. Drawing upon Oaklands Pop-Up Hoods, we will also provide incentives
(e.g. rent subsidies and renovation assistance) that ensure graduate businesses locate within the
Northside target area. With the support of a local and national foundation, two pilot social
enterprises will kick off in 2013, before the Square is developed. A multiethnic food business
will first offer products in high traffic locations (e.g., sports arenas, the airport, festivals, and
farmers markets), and an artisan furniture business will develop products to a Syracuse company
that provides furniture to libraries and museums throughout North America. These businesses
(and, eventually, other retail enterprises) will later become anchor tenants within the
Marketplace. The Marketplace will also feature notable regional businesses that come with
established customer bases. Other planned social enterprises will provide services (e.g., a
construction enterprise that launches as subcontractor in the development of the Square; an IT
enterprise offering tech support within the Square). Entre-ployees within these enterprises may
either spinoff their own businesses, or potentially purchase the enterprises that employ them.
A suite of Empowerment programs will be integrated with Employment and Entrepreneurial
programs as well as offered to others in the community. Designed to enhance residents quality
of life and foster civic engagement, we will offer classes in homebuyer education, financial
capacity building, citizenship, and community leadership.
Combining the power of place and people, Cultural Exchange programs will attract the
greater Syracuse community to the Northside to experience a worlds worth of cultures and
customs. Classes offered in the resource center will range from foreign languages to ethnic dance
and cooking. A soccer program in the plazas green space will provide recreational opportunities
to area youth, while drawing suburban teams and their families into the Square for matches.
Cultural festivals on the plaza will draw diverse crowds, generate energy, and further establish
the Northsides identity as Syracuses International Village. Ultimately, Cultural Exchange
programs will foster reciprocal learning and shared experiences among diverse groups of people.
World Market Square will have a transformative impact on the City of Syracuse by
empowering people, enlivening place, and fostering possibilities. The idea has strengths within
each of the overarching types of innovation but is especially innovative as a New Program.
The project represents a strategic integration of people-centered and place-based development.
When we invest in place without engaging and providing opportunities for residents on the frontend, the result is either prolonged market weakness or gentrification. Meanwhile, providing
economic opportunities for low-income individuals, without addressing their neighborhoods,
results in people leaving for elsewhere once they can afford to do so. World Market Square
charts a different course by empowering Northside residents, economically and civically, and
then creates incentives for individuals to remain and invest in the neighborhood. This innovation
will increase prosperity, maintain diversity and draw visitors from the region and beyond, and it
will inform strategies for achieving the same dynamic in other neighborhoods, both in Syracuse
and throughout the country.
4
95
Mayors Challenge
Syracuse, NY
Implement
As a city government, we find it crucial to empower our international populations to
become change agents. In 2012 we engaged a team of community leaders and social
entrepreneurs who had, over the past six years, coalesced around a strategy to this end when a
mixed-use corridor on the citys Near Northside was targeted for growth. During that time
Northside Urban Partnership (Northside UP) established a variety of employment training and
entrepreneurial programs, business and housing partnerships, and quality of life improvements
on the Near Northside.
World Market Square is a physical place in a central crossroads, long viewed as a
strategic site for investment (as evidenced by a Ford Foundation Creative Communities project
in 2006). It synergizes Place, People and Possibilities. Sequencing of and relationships between
these activities are found in the attached timeline.
Place: World Market Square will encompass the Marketplace, a resource center, and plaza.
A community design process will begin in 2013 to design, officially name and help brand the
project.
The Marketplace 2013: Acquisition of the building followed by a community design; 2014:
Ribbon cutting on completed building project in fall with vendors and entrepreneurs moving in;
2015: Rooftop greenhouse opening; 2016-2020: possible expansion to accommodate more
vendors and programs.
Resource center 2013: Acquisition of building followed by community design; 2014:
Rehabilitation commences in spring with classes beginning in fall.
Plaza 2013: Site acquisition and design underway; 2014: A street adjacent to the Marketplace
and resource center to be closed, retrofitted with green infrastructure, and soccer field; 2014:
Project opened to public in summer.
People: Opportunity Enterprises will include programming for employment,
entrepreneurship, and empowerment activities. Fundraising, planning, program expansion
throughout 2013.
Employment 2006: The Ford Foundation seeded our employment training, placement and
wrap-around service model with the charge that it be scalable and replicable; 2009: Employment
programs began. To date, 175 trainees have graduated with a 90% job placement rate in both
construction and health care fields, and employers continue to seek out our graduates; 2013:
Scale up and diversify these services; 2015: By the end of the year, programs will be offered in
cultural cuisines, artisanal furniture and construction.
Entrepreneurship 2012: Received $85,000 seed funding to begin planning and implementing
coordinated entrepreneurship training program; 2013: Pilot Mobile Marketplace, selling
culinary products and artisanal furniture offsite and beginning sales at area outlets, capped by the
first spinoff launch of a new business; 2014: Construction classes assist with project
development during spring and summer with first full group of entre-ployees starting in the
new Marketplace space in fall; 2015: Agribusiness and tech services programs start.
Empowerment 2014: Empowerment classes begin with the opening of the resource center. In
addition to classes targeted to trainees and entre-ployees, other classes in financial literacy,
hospitality, home-buying and citizenship begin and continue throughout.
96
Mayors Challenge
Syracuse, NY
Possibilities: Cultural Exchange programming will offer visitors from within the community
and throughout the region an opportunity for engage in cultural activities.
Existing arts and cultural exchange programs, including yoga classes, sewing and gardening are
prepared for eventual inclusion in the resource center and plaza. Fall 2013 festivals (naming and
design presentation) and 2014 ribbon cutting will further enhance community pride. At this time
classes, developed and taught by community members, are piloted upon the resource centers
opening. Students from within the community and surrounding region engage in foreign
language, dance, music, crafting and other types of classes. In 2014 a soccer league is launched
in the adjacent plaza. The full cultural exchange program launches in 2015 including: community
gatherings, public art, performances, and more classes as determined by the community.
Syracuses Bloomberg Prize will be administered by the City, with Northside UP as the
lead organization. Additional key committed partners include St. Josephs Hospital Health
Center (property owner, lead developer); Home HeadQuarters (housing developer,
empowerment training delivery, strategic commercial property development); Cooperative
Federal Credit Union (community development financial institution (CDFI), empowerment
programming through microlending and small business loans, individual development accounts
(IDAs), and financial literacy); CenterState CEO (regional economic development organization,
chamber of commerce, will leverage resources and engage private sector members, tourism
promotion, entrepreneurial assistance); Northside Business Partnership (merchants association
largely consisting of historic immigrant businesses, committed to supporting new small
businesses); Gifford Foundation (community planning, leadership development); Refugee
Resettlement Agencies (Catholic Charities and Interfaith Works are committed to supporting and
guiding empowerment programs); Ethnic Community Based Organizations and other community
partners and stakeholders (community engagement, feedback and partnerships) ; Wegmans
(regional grocer, providing culinary training, exploring possible broader role including marketing
supports); ProLiteracy/Interweave Solutions (adapting entrepreneurial/literacy training used
successfully in the developing world by piloting a domestic application.)
As we discussed implementation risks in Ideas Camp and coaching sessions, we realized
acquiring and rehabilitating properties is a potentially significant financial burden. Therefore, we
are covering the majority of our capital costs by compiling existing grants and an investment
from St. Josephs Hospital with a significant portion of the Bloomberg prize to address our
capital costs. This compilation of funds minimizes our projected debt service on the properties
and ensures that a majority of revenues can be applied to programming.
To provide sustainability, a multipronged revenue strategy is being developed by:
Through existing programs, Northside UP has facilitated changes on the Northside. Work to date
has positioned neighborhood properties, residents, and organizations on the cusp of a
renaissance. By condensing output and outcome efforts into the target area through 2015, we will
compound our potential impact throughout the city to 2020 and beyond.
97
2013
2014
OE Entrepreneur
Program:
Cultural Cuisines
Opportunity Enterprises
(OE): Program Expansion,
Planning, and Fundraising
OE Entrepreneur
Program:
Construction
POSSIBILITIES
70 OE Career
Placements
Cultural Exchange
Program Launch:
Soccer League
4 OE Business
Launches / 18
Residents Hired
Additional
Visitors
Attracted to
Area
Install
Greenhouse
Additional
Visitors
Attracted to
Area
75 OE Career
Placements
OE Participants
Become
Homeowners
8 OE Business
Launches / 32
Residents Hired
KEY:
98
OE
Programs
Expand
105 OE Career
Placements
OE Participants
Become
Homeowners
Cultural Exchange
Programs Expand
OE Entrepreneur
Program: Tech
Services
Development
Concluded: Interior
Work / Exterior
Work / Plaza /
Public Art
Development Begins:
Architectural Design /
Engineering / Financing
/ Permitting / Interior
Construction
1 OE Business
Launch / 3
Residents Hired
Cultural
Exchange
Programs
Expand
OE Programs
Expand to
Other
Neighborhoods
CULTURAL EXCHANGE
COMPLETION
World Market
Square Community
Visioning Launch:
Planning / Naming /
Marketing Strategy
OE Entrepreneur
Program:
Agribusiness
OE Employment
Programs Expand
OE Programs
Launch in World
Market Square
2016-2020
PROJECT
PEOPLE
OE Entrepreneur
Program: Artisanal
Furniture
OE Employment
Programs:
Construction
and Health Care
P LA
C
2015
Additional
Visitors
Attracted to
Area
Continued OE
Business
Launches /
Residents Hired
Continued
OE Career
Placements
OE Participants
Become
Homeowners
OPPORTUNITY ENTERPRISES
Mayors Challenge
Syracuse, NY
Impact
We believe that our New American city residents are not problems to be minimized, nor
clients to be served, but assets to empower. Repeatedly we have witnessed that when given tools,
New Americans flourish. Their children also flourish; commonly in Syracuse we see the children
of New Americans becoming valedictorians of their City schools. Thus, we know that by
investing in New Americans and their children, we tap into the tremendous skills, talents, energy
and other potentials they bring. We also believe that investing in people is not sufficient on its
own in order to transform a neighborhood. Our experience in community development indicates
that when we invest in people, we must also address the place in which they live. To transform a
neighborhood dynamic we must invest in and rehabilitate the neighborhood itself, and we must
assist and incentivize residents to participate in this process. We must publicly recognize and
celebrate the cultural assets New Americans bring, and facilitate their interaction with the larger
community. By doing so, we not only change lives of New Americans and their children, but we
begin to transform a whole community dynamic.
Consistent empowerment of our residents leads to sustainable change. Thus, we will
formalize and systematize known and innovative avenues of resident empowerment and
neighborhood investment, and make them accessible to neighborhood residents by locating them
in one central and visible location: World Market Square. When we combine concrete and
sustainable investments in people and place, we create new possibilities. New Americans
become part of our larger communitys economy, culture and identity, and we make the
neighborhood a place where their children want to stay, where other New Americans want to
come, and where people from all around the region wish to visit.
By facilitating the employment, entrepreneurship, and empowerment of Northside
residents over the course of three years, we anticipate placing 212 individuals into careers;
launching 13 resident-owned businesses within a 7 block target area within the Northside, which
in turn will hire 53 individuals. Based upon past experiences, we anticipate this will attract added
investment within the target area, resulting in approximately 16 mixed-use development projects
rehabilitated, creating 25 commercial units and 94 residential units; and reducing commercial
vacancy by 82% by filling 25 of 28 vacant storefronts.
While we will utilize a variety of methods to measure outputs, outcomes and impacts, we
intend also to use analytics taken from our experience with the IBM Smarter Cities program. Our
work with IBM provided us with an analytic model to evaluate progress, understand the effects
of individual program activities, weigh the importance and priority of different initiative
elements, and employ predictive analytics to help us understand ongoing and upcoming
demographic, economic, housing and other trends. This will help us comprehend what impacts
the World Market Square is having on those trends, and vice versa.We can think of no better way
to articulate the overall impact of the World Market Square on the community and city than by
asking you to step into the life, and the future, of Ganga, a Bhutanese refugee who after 15 years
in a Nepalese refugee camp has arrived in Syracuse.
Accompanied by his mother, wife and five children, Ganga struggled to learn English
and support his family. At Bhutanese Community Association meetings, he joined community
sessions designing the new World Market Square. When the Marketplace at the Square opened,
Ganga looked into the entrepreneurship program. He had always desired to own his own
restaurant, but had no capital and few skills beyond eagerness to work, drive to succeed, and a
love of cooking. Thus, he was reluctant to leave his low-paying job as a custodian.
10
99
Mayors Challenge
Syracuse, NY
After interviews with Marketplace staff, who were struck by his unpolished yet evident
acumen, Ganga became a Marketplace employee, which enabled him to earn a living wage while
undergoing intensive preparation for owning his own restaurant. His coach assisted Ganga in
setting up an Individual Assessment Plan and he began developing a business plan while
embarking on an entrepreneurship curriculum that included ESL classes. Chefs from the noted
supermarket chain, Wegmans, began teaching domestic regulations and practices while refining
Gangas culinary skills. All the while Ganga earned enough money to support his family while
putting some in an Individual Development Account (IDA) a matching savings program that
allows people to save for key capital needs with Cooperative Federal Credit Union. With the
support of a financial counselor, Ganga also entered the Credit Unions Credit Builders club
and established a budget with his family.
Meanwhile Ganga and his family also began visiting the Squares resource center, for
classes on civic engagement and leadership skills. Ganga began volunteering for a youth soccer
league using the Plazas green space within the Square. At the World Kitchen his wife Devi
gathered with other community members to attend Italian cooking lessons given by a longtime
Northside resident. His mother, a skilled seamstress, began teaching sewing to a number of
multi-cultural youth.
Six months later Ganga is halfway through his rigorous program. His ESL level is
advancing, as is his IDA. Each day at the Marketplace Ganga prepares food not only from his
home country, but other styles as well, and is becoming skilled in comprehensive restaurant
management through hands-on learning. His 16-year old son has begun working at the rooftop
greenhouse, where he helps cultivate vegetables for the Marketplaces international cuisine and
flowers for the Squares surrounding Plaza.
A year after he entered the program Ganga has taken advantage of creative financing
and location incentives to enter into a rent-to-own program for a building two blocks away from
the Square. Needing some repairs, he bartered with another graduate from the Marketplace, a
former Somali refugee who owns a rehabbing business. Ganga employs seven people and enjoys
a loyal following from the Bhutanese community, but is also attracting a much broader audience
from around the region. In one year a vacant storefront is now filled and on the tax rolls, and
Ganga and his family are off all public assistance. He is heavily involved with the areas local
merchants association. He and his wife now mentor new Bhutanese refugee families.
Two years later After completing a first-time home buyer program at the Squares
resource center, Ganga and his wife bought a home through the Land Bank; its 5 blocks from
WMS. Additional workshops enhance Gangas marketing techniquesincreasing his business
regional popularity, so he doubled his staff. Next door a clothing store opened, owned by a
Cuban refugee, also a graduate of the Squares entrepreneurship program. On the other side, a
longtime Italian restaurant has seen its business grow due to increased interest in and traffic to
the neighborhood. Ganga and other graduates of the Squares programs are organizing a
cooperative for bulk purchasing and back office services.
And back at World Market Square? A suburban mother waits in the Plaza for her
daughter to complete an Arabic language class at the resource center, enjoying bubble tea she
picked up inside the Marketplace while she people watches and listens to a string quartet. At a
table nearby, university students surf the web through the free wireless signal thats available
within the Square. The International Village, Northside neighborhood, city and region are
experiencing growth in economic opportunity, education, tourism and civic life.
11
100
Outputs
We expect that once completed
or underway, these activities
will produce the following
evidence of service delivery:
Outcomes
We expect that if completed or
ongoing, these activities will
lead to the following changes
in the short term:
Development records
Program participant tracking database
Certificates of completion
Attendance/enrollment; sponsorship
dollars/revenues, visitor experience
Revenues within marketplace
City records
On what timeline?
2013-2015
Impact
We expect that if completed,
these activities will lead to the
following changes in the long
term:
Raise Money
Build Partnerships
Engage People
Acquire Property
Design/Brand WMS
Finalize WMS business plan
Launch Opportunity Enterprises (OE)programming in employment,
entrepreneurship, & empowerment
Launch Cultural Exchange (CE) Program
WMS properties rehabbed and opened
212 residents placed into careers through
employment programs
40 Entre-ployees working in
entrepreneurship programs
350 residents complete empowerment
programs
2 annual cultural festivals, 6 ongoing CE
classes, and soccer league established
Attract local and regional visitors and
shoppers to WMS
Increased prosperity among OE
participants
101
2013-2015
2013-2015
2013-2020
Mayors Challenge
Syracuse, NY
Replicate
World Market Square (WMS) presents an innovative model for community development
reinforcing the empowerment of New Americans. With growing immigration numbers and largescale refugee resettlement to US urban centers, New Americans are finding themselves
concentrated in urban settings already struggling with disinvestment, blight and associated social
problems. Our model presents an opportunity for cities to embrace key lessons not least of
which is how to successfully help native-born residents, long-time immigrants, recent
immigrants and refugees navigate an emerging paradigm of shared investment and ownership.
The core principles and elements of our idea can be modified to fit other local contexts
with their own resident-generated vision, goals and outcomes. Optimally these elements are
surrounded by a community dynamic where residents both literally and figuratively become
owners of their neighborhood and destiny. The Opportunity Enterprises and Civic Empowerment
programs are designed to be replicable. ProLiteracys support of the entrepreneurship programs
adapts an internationally-used curriculum for use in Syracuse and distribution throughout the
U.S. The entrepreneurship program aggregates lessons learned across the country and can be
advanced as the next generation model.
Each community will experience its own unique challenges while adapting the WMS
model, and can expect two distinct challenges:
Partnership Building: Relationship-based partnerships are integral to successful
implementation for WMS programming but identifying necessary partners can be daunting. In
Syracuse, partnerships have developed organically in ways that can inform other cities. Early
engagement and conversation is critical. Partners need to be willing to marry community vision
with their self-interest. It is also helpful to engage partners who bring skill sets or resources
unique to the program, or those with a vested interest in participant success. Syracuses Mayors
Office demonstrated leadership, deferring to leveraging of existing partnerships. In other cities,
mayoral leadership will be necessary to identify and rally partners. These essential partnerships
would include representatives from community-based organizations, educational providers,
CDFIs, businesses and anchor institutions.
Resources: Necessary to facilitate programming, create workable spaces and provide
incentives for property investment and business placement, identifying and securing resources
for implementation will vex cities. Leveraging resources from myriad sources with creative
solutions will be required. Communities should seek to fund programs through local and national
philanthropy. Beyond this, creative resource development will be imperative. This should
include strategically aligned in-kind commitments from partners. Asking partners to contribute
resources that are relative to their size and proportional to their assets can help to offset
challenging implementation scenarios. Additionally, it may be necessary to pursue alternative
revenue streams such as fee-for-job-placement services, social entrepreneurship revenue, and
social impact bond programs.
It is evident that Syracuse has already developed an advanced set of tools and resources
for empowering New Americans. Following Ideas Camp, we have begun providing advice to the
city of Lexington, Kentucky on resettling and empowering refugees, and we intend to continue to
work together. Perhaps the most important lesson other cities can learn from Syracuse is to
identify New Americans not as people who need to be served but as individuals to be
empowered. This recognition will inspire innovations appropriate to the specific context and
community.
13
102