Biomass Fuel Chemical Analysis
Biomass Fuel Chemical Analysis
Biomass Fuel Chemical Analysis
mE*, TNEERw
H
N
0016-2361(95)00142-5
on biomass
1812
EXPERIMENTAL
S a m p l e selection and preparation
Feedstock properties. Thirteen commonly available
Properties of biomass
Proximate analysis (wt%)
Bagasse
Coconut coir
Coconut shell
Coir pith
Corn cob
Corn stalks
Cotton gin waste
Groundnut shell
Millet husk
Rice husk
Rice straw
Subabul wood
Wheat straw
VM (daf)
Ash (db)
HHV a
(MJ kg-1)
Density
(kg m - ' )
84.2
82.8
80.2
73.3
85.4
80.1
88.0
83.0
80.7
81.6
80.2
85.6
83.9
2.9
0.9
0.7
7.1
2.8
6.8
5.4
5.9
18.1
23.5
19.8
0.9
11.2
43.8
47.6
50.2
44.0
47.6
41.9
42.7
48.3
42.7
38.9
36.9
48.2
47.5
5.8
5.7
5.7
4.7
5.0
5.3
6.0
5.7
6.0
5.1
5,0
5.9
5.4
0.4
0.2
0.0
0.7
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.8
0.1
0.6
0.4
0.0
0.1
47. l
45.6
43.4
43.4
44.6
46.0
49.5
39.4
33.0
32.0
37.9
45.1
35.8
16.29
14.67
20.50
18.07
15.65
16.54
17.48
18.65
17.48
15.29
16.78
19.78
17.99
111
151
661
94
188
129
109
299
201
617
259
259
222
Table 2
Bagasse
Coconut coir
Coconut shell
Coir pith
Corn cob
Corn stalks
Cotton gin waste
Groundnut shell
Millet husk
Rice husk
Rice straw
Subabul wood
Wheat straw
Table 3
Ash
Holocellulose
Cellulose
Hemicellulose
Lignin
Extractives
Total
(holo)
Total
(hemi)
2.9
0.8
0.7
7.1
2.8
6.8
5.4
5.9
18.1
23.5
19.8
0.9
11.2
65.0
67.0
67.0
40.6
68.2
63.5
90.2
55.6
50.6
49.4
52.3
65.9
55.8
41.3
47.7
36.3
28.6
40.3
42.7
77.8
35.7
33.3
31.3
37.0
39.8
30.5
22.6
25.9
25.1
15.3
28.7
23.6
16.0
18.7
26.9
24.3
22.7
24.0
28.9
18.3
17.8
28.7
31.2
16.6
17.5
0.0
30.2
14.0
14.3
13.6
24.7
16.4
13.7
6.8
8.3
15.8
15.4
9.8
1.1
10.3
10.8
8.4
13.1
9.7
13.4
99.9
111.7
98.7
94.8
102.9
97.6
86.7
102.0
96.5
96.5
98.8
101.2
96.7
98.8
99.0
100.1
98.1
101.8
100.5
100.2
100.7
104.1
101.8
106.2
99.0
100.4
Bagasse
Coconut coir
Coconut shell
Coir pith
Corn cob
Corn stalks
Cotton gin waste
Ground nut shell
Millet husk
Rice husk
Rice straw
Subabul wood
Wheat straw
A1
Ca
Fe
Mg
Na
Si
1518
477
1501
3126
182
4686
3737
12 970
6255
1793
4772
6025
7666
125
187
115
837
24
518
746
1092
1020
533
205
614
132
6261
532
389
8095
1693
5924
4924
3547
11 140
1612
6283
1170
4329
93
1758
1243
10 564
141
6463
1298
467
1427
132
5106
92
7861
2682
2438
1965
26 283
9366
32
7094
17 690
3860
9061
5402
614
28 930
284
47
94
1170
445
2127
736
278
1267
337
752
100
214
17 340
2990
256
13 050
9857
13 400
13 000
10 960
150 840
220690
174 510
195
44440
148
73
1653
1911
3642
2455
p l a s m a - a t o m i c e m i s s i o n s p e c t r o s c o p y a r e p r e s e n t e d in
Tables 3 a n d 4.
Sample preparation. T o u n d e r s t a n d t h e i n f l u e n c e
of mineral matter, two types of sample were studied:
(1) d e m i n e r a l i z e d b i o m a s s ; (2) s y n t h e t i c b i o m a s s . T o
confirm the results, studies were also carried out on
salt-impregnated and acid-soaked samples of selected
b i o m a s s t y p e s . T h e s a m p l e s w e r e p r e p a r e d as f o l l o w s .
Demineralization was carried out in two stages. In the
first s t a g e , b i o m a s s s a m p l e s w i t h p a r t i c l e size r a n g i n g
f r o m 100 t o 2 5 0 m m w e r e t r e a t e d w i t h 1 0 % HC1 a t 6 0 C
1813
Biomass
Co
Cr
Bagasse
Coconut coir
Coconut shell
0.6
0.5
3.2
8.0
2.3
-
Coir pith
Corn cob
Corn stalks
Cotton gin waste
Groundnut shell
Millet husk
Rice husk
Rice straw
Subabul wood
Wheat straw
Cu
2.0
0.3
0.2
11
6
-
Mn
Ni
18
16
60
16
68
5
1239
T ~
32
T
11
T
21
T
1
7
4
1
27
19
12
38
44
38
108
463
2
25
2
13
22
6
13
64
35
476
15
564
58
299
317
163
221
66
787
25
9
40
11
32
22
52
94
1244
47
40
18
10
lI
49
32
45
1
25
Zn
...... . . .
m'-'-N
['l:',>q
','';,
-:-',
8 CLEANING PORT
1 ROTAHETER
9 PRODUCT VAPOUR
2 GAS HEATER
10 TEMPERATURE CONTROLLER
3 PYROLYSIS REACTOR
(ELECTRICAL FURNACEI
11 TEMPERATURE INDICATOR
4 CERAMIC WOOL
INSULATION
15 CONDENSING TRAIN
6 CERAMIC TUBE
, ,;.
T T HER NO COUPLE
Tb
12 CONDENSER TUBE
1/, WATER CIRCULATION PUMP
16 GAS FLOW METER
7 SAMPLE BOAT
:.:'Y,;.:
Figure 1
Thermal analysis
Dynamic t.g.a, studies were carried out with a thermal
analyser on untreated, demineralized and synthetic
biomass samples at a heating rate of 5 0 K m i n -1 in a
nitrogen flow.
1814
Pyrolysis
Experiments were conducted in a packed bed pyrolyser
designed for the purpose, with provision for collecting
the pyrolysis products. Figure I shows a schematic of the
pyrolysis reactor.
Based on the results of the thermal analysis, five
representative biomass types were selected for further
investigations using this reactor. Isothermal experiments
in a nitrogen flow at 773 K were conducted on 10-25 g
samples of each of these five biomass samples, both
untreated and demineralized. The volatiles evolved were
collected and quenched in a train of flasks immersed in
an ice bath. The remaining non-condensable gases were
passed through a flow meter. The experiment was
continued until the evolution of gases ceased. The
furnace was then switched off and the remaining char
was cooled in the nitrogen flow to room temperature and
then weighed. The tar yield was obtained from the
0,8-
....
CORN
2-0
Untreated
Oeashed
"~\. V I
=1.5
1.0 o,
o 0.~-
300 3'50
4'00 t,50
Temperature({;
Figure 2
5'00 5'50
6'00 6"50
700
cob
Thermal analysis
Influence of demineralization.
Representative t.g.a.
and d.t.g, curves for untreated and demineralized biomass are presented in Figure 2. The changes in volatile
and char yields on demineralization, as well as the
changes in maximum rate of pyrolysis and incipient
devolatilization temperature for all the biomass types
are shown in Table 5.
Table 5 clearly brings out the influence of mineral
matter. It can be seen that the removal of mineral matter
increases the yield of volatiles except for coir pith,
groundnut shell and rice husk. Demineralization
increases the maximum rate of devolatilization and the
initial decomposition temperature in all cases. The
exceptional behaviour of the above three biomass types
may be explained on the following grounds.
Rice husk, groundnut shell and coir pith can be seen to
Bagasse
Coconut coir
Coconut shell
Coir pith
Corncob
Corn stalks
Cotton gin waste
G r o u n d n u t shell
Millet husk
Rice husk
Rice straw
Subabul wood
Wheat straw
State a
Volatiles
Char
Max. devol.
rate (wt% K -])
U
D
79.7
81.4
20.3
18.6
0.92
1.27
2.2
-8.5
U
D
69.8
70.8
30.2
29.2
0.80
1.28
1.3
U
D
70.7
72.7
29.3
27.3
0.75
1.01
2.80
U
D
56.8
52.2
43.2
47.8
0.56
0.50
U
D
73.5
88.8
26.5
11.2
U
D
70.9
77.0
U
D
Volatiles
Char
Max. rate
Temperature (K)"
IDT
IPT
TMR
39.4
483
528
688
708
677
673
-3.0
58.9
513
548
673
713
672
678
-6.6
35.2
518
533
678
718
615
620
-8.2
10.8
-11.0
483
513
663
948
622
633
1.08
1.64
20.8
-57.7
51.5
533
558
653
698
603
660
29.1
28.0
1.14
1.95
8.6
-0.2
58.9
498
533
653
683
634
639
80.6
89.4
19.4
10.6
1.31
1.86
10.8
-45.1
36.1
523
553
688
693
679
684
U
D
68.7
66.7
31.3
33.3
0.67
0.75
-2.9
6.3
12.1
493
513
683
673
662
668
U
D
70.1
80.6
29.9
19.4
0.88
1.48
15.0
-16.2
68.4
523
503
663
683
653
658
U
D
70.0
66.2
30.0
33.8
0.84
1.07
-5.1
12.6
26.9
518
543
663
693
666
668
U
D
DD a
74.7
82.1
81.6
25.3
17.9
18.4
1.03
1.31
1.27
9.9
9.3
-29.3
-27.4
27.0
23.3
518
548
523
673
703
693
651
653
655
U
D
75.4
77.3
24.6
22.7
0.97
1.27
2.4
-7.3
30.8
U
D
72.8
75.1
27.2
24.9
0.90
1.21
3.2
-8.5
34.3
498
528
493
518
603
728
663
668
672
688
604
617
a U, untreated; D, demineralized
b D a f biomass basis
( IDT, initial decomposition; IPT, involution point; T M R , max. rate
a Alkali-treated after acid treatment
1815
15.0
I
BG-BAGASSE
CN-CASHEWNUT SHELL
ACB
CR-COCONUT
COIR
CS-COCONUT SHELL
MH
A
10.0 ~
~
CP-COIR
CB-CORN
CS-CORN
PITH
COB
STALKS
CW-COTTONGIN WASTE
GS-GROUNDNUT SHELL
MH- MILLET HUSK
R H - R I C E HUSK
R S - R I C E STRAW
WD-WO00
WS- WH EAT STRAW
CW
A
A
RS
~ ~
CT
o 5.0"
o
c
.A WS
--
~ 0.0.
u
SE=2"29
Y - - 0 . 9 6 4 xX.,7.192
I
I
I
-5.0.
&.0
7.5
9.0
Ligninl.0952XK 1.3727 Xz0.0996
I I i
14.0
15.0
1.00 ~
1.00 I ~ ~
1.00
ORIGINAL ]
--~ "~"- SYNTHETIC 0.75
0.75
u
O
u.
cg
I i I I I I I I I [ I I I I i , i l I l i i i I I I i I I
-1.1
"',,.A
I
I
I
I
-I0.0
Figure 3
RH
0.50 /
~ll
I
~
75.0 -";.=o ~
O
0.50
e"
1.00
OEASHED
50.0-
-0.50
O
tO1
025
0.25
.~ 25.0-
o,25
O
>
0.00
Figure 4
:a.~.
150 250
i
450 C)
I
350
Temperature(
0.~
700
I-n.-.~
I
150
250
- - ,--'a--D--n-$.~~
nt~ I "
I
!
I
I
I v.vv
350 450 550 650 700
Temperature(C)
1816
0.00
Yield (wt%f
Volatiles
Char
Max. devol.
rate (wt % K- l )
86.5
62.6
99.0
63.4
56.8
52.2
13.5
37.4
1.0
36.6
43.2
47.8
0.80
0.99
0.69
0.43
0.56
0.50
65.7
19.9
89.7
21.5
8.9
-
-71.7
-21.8
-97.9
-23.4
-9.7
79.3
74.6
98.6
70.8
68.7
66.7
20.7
25.4
1.4
29.2
31.3
33.3
1.04
1.12
0.68
0.57
0.67
0.75
18.9
11.8
47.8
6.1
3.0
80.7
76.6
97.9
77.7
70.0
66.2
19.3
23.4
2.1
22.3
30.0
33.8
1.06
1.15
0.66
0.45
0.84
1.07
21.9
15.6
47.8
17.4
5.7
Volatiles
Char
Temperature (K)c
Max. rate
IDT
IPT
TMR
59.9
98.5
38.0
13.1
12.4
483
463
698
503
483
513
683
693
953
778
663
948
370
365
883
693
622
633
-37.9
-23.6
-95.6
-12.2
-6.0
38.4
48.8
-8.8
-23.5
-10.8
493
493
693
493
493
513
683
683
943
773
683
673
653
643
883
583
662
668
-42.9
-30.7
-93.8
-34.1
-11.2
-
- 1.4
7.5
-38.3
-58.2
-21.2
-
533
533
723
603
518
543
603
603
953
883
703
673
658
653
883
773
666
668
Coirpith
KCI (H)a
(L)~
ZnCI2 (H)
(L)
Untreated
Demineralized
Groundnut shell
KC1 (H)
(L)
ZnC12 (H)
(L)
Untreated
Demineralized
Rice husk
KC1 (H)
(L)
ZnCI2 (H)
(L)
Untreated
Demineralized
a H, high, L, low, concentration of solution (0.36 and 0.01 gml J for KC1, 1.0 and 0.1 gml -j for ZnCI2)
b Compared with the demineralized biomass
Table 7
Coir pith
Corn cob
Groundnut shell
Rice husk
Wood
State
Vol.
Char
Liquid
Gas
U
D
U
D
U
D
U
D
U
D
70.5
68.7
79.9
87.1
72.9
72.5
82.7
75.6
80.7
86.4
29.5
31.3
20.1
12.9
27.1
27.5
17.3
24.4
19.3
13.6
29.4
36.2
37.4
43.4
40.5
45.9
41.2
57.4
22.6
40.1
41.0
32.5
42.5
43.6
32.5
26.6
41.5
18.2
58.0
46.4
l'095v.-xKl'3727V0.0996"~./x
Z
)+
7.192
Vol.
Char
Liquid
Gas
-2.4
5.5
23.1
-20.8
8.9
-35.6
16.0
-3.2
-0.5
1.5
13.4
-9.1
-8.6
41.3
39.3
-56.2
7.1
-29.8
76.9
-20.1
1817
Salt
impregnated
(wt%)
Char
Liquid
Gas
Volatiles
Char
Liquid
52.9
9.7
18.8
2.8
-
80.5
75.6
90.1
83.6
70.5
68.7
19.5
24.4
9.9
16.4
29.5
31.3
24.2
28.4
25.9
29.4
29.4
36.2
56.2
47.2
64.2
54.2
41.0
32.5
17.1
10.0
31.1
21.7
-2.5
-37.6
-22.0
-28.5
-19.0
-5.5
-33.1
-21.7
-28.5
-19.0
-18.8
73.1
45.4
97.6
67.0
26.2
54.0
3.3
13.9
2.6
-
76.7
73.8
90.8
76.4
72.9
72.5
23.3
26.2
9.2
23.6
27.1
27.5
34.3
39.3
18.9
26.8
40.5
45.9
42.5
34.5
71.9
50.4
32.4
26.6
5.8
1.8
25.1
5.3
0.5
-15.3
-4.7
-66.3
-14.1
-1.5
-25.4
-14.4
-58.9
-41.6
-11.8
59.5
29.6
170.0
89.3
21.7
27.6
1.7
9.8
1.5
-
77.4
77.0
87.1
78.1
82.7
75.6
22.6
23.0
12.9
21.9
17.3
24.4
35.1
42.2
38.4
30.0
41.2
57.4
42.3
34.8
48.8
48.1
41.5
18.2
2.4
1.9
15.3
3.4
9.5
-7.5
-5.9
-47.3
-10.5
-29.2
-38.8
-26.4
-33.1
-47.7
-28.2
132.2
91.2
167.9
164.3
128.2
Gas
Coir pith
KC1 (H)a
(L) a
ZnC12 (H)
(L)
Untreated
Demineralized
Groundnut shell
KCI (H)
(L)
ZnC12 (H)
(L)
Untreated
Demineralized
Rice husk
KCI (H)
(L)
ZnC12 (H)
(L)
Untreated
Demineralized
Volatiles
Char
Liquid
Gas
Volatiles
Char
Liquid
Gas
49.4
6.8
39.5
11.8
68.3
73.7
83.9
75.3
72.9
72.5
31.7
26.3
16.1
24.7
27.1
27.5
6.1
10.0
5.9
16.7
40.5
45.9
62.2
63.7
78.0
58.6
32.4
26.6
-5.9
1.6
15.1
3.8
0.5
15.6
-4.3
-41.4
-10.0
-1.5
-86.8
-78.1
-87.2
-63.6
-11.8
133.6
139.2
193.0
120.1
21.7
33.3
11.1
22.8
6.5
-
71.7
86.7
78.4
78.0
82.7
75.6
28.3
13.3
21.6
22.0
17.3
24.4
5.5
11.9
5.5
13.9
41.2
57.4
66.2
74.8
72.9
60.0
41.5
18.2
-5.1
14.7
3.8
2.1
9.5
15.6
-45.5
-11.8
-6.4
-29.2
-90.4
-79.4
-90.4
-75.7
-28.2
263.9
311.0
300.8
230.0
128.2
Groundnut shell
KzCO 3 (H)
(L)
ZnCO 3 (H)
(L)
Untreated
Demineralized
Rice husk
KzCO 3 (H)
(L)
ZnCO3 (H)
(L)
Untreated
Demineralized
1818
Untreated
Demineralized
Change
in Crl (%)
Coir pith
Corn cob
Groundnut shell
Rice husk
Wood
8.7
34.6
25.0
43.6
44.0
12.5
32.3
50.1
53.3
41.8
43.2
-6.6
100.0
22.2
-5.1
Coir pith
Corn cob
Groundnut shell
Rice husk
Wood
Standard c
State
InZdexb
12
adsorbed
(wt%)
U
D
U
D
U
D
U
D
DD a
U
D
-
1.56
2.07
1.20
2.89
0.89
2.01
2.09
1.62
3.20
0.72
0.75
4.18
29.9
39.8
23.0
55.5
19.6
43.0
44.6
34.6
61.3
15.5
16.1
98.0
Change
in 12
adsorbed
(%)
12
index
(daf)
12
adsorbed
(daf)
BET
area
(m2g J)
22.4
1.77
2.26
1.49
3.51
1.11
2.18
6.42
6.59
33.9
45.2
28.5
67.3
24.4
46.6
137.1
140.8
470
625
381
500
277
375
260
340
3.9
0.75
0.76
16.2
16.2
234
252
32.9
141.4
119.0
Change
in BET
area (%)
32.6
31.2
35.4
30.8
7.7
Coir pith
Corn cob
Groundnut shell
Rice husk
Wood
State
Biomass Char
Liquids
Gas~
U
D
U
D
U
D
U
D
U
D
19.46
16.11
19.82
19.98
19.95
18.66
22.33
23.81
24.19
23.62
26.15
22.45
23.72
24.94
28.54
16.06
10.51
05.19
08.01
10.00
02.97
07.42
07.13
16.61
11.28
24.97
26.19
28.59
26.35
27.43
29.76
44.24
30.96
24.13
24.24
a By difference
tion can be a t t r i b u t e d to the presence of i n o r g a n i c
material.
Pyrolysis
To verify the above results, the three exceptional
materials (coir pith, rice husk a n d g r o u n d n u t shell) a n d
two other typical representative materials (wood a n d
c o r n c o b ) were used for further studies with the packed
bed pyrolyser, in the u n t r e a t e d , demineralized a n d salti m p r e g n a t e d forms.
Coir pith
Corn cob
Groundnut shell
Rice husk
Wood
State
Char
Liquids
Gas
U
D
U
D
U
D
U
37.9
42.1
35.6
21.2
37.4
41.2
38.3
37.9
23.4
16.5
28.2
39.3
49.4
53.2
44.7
54.0
46.3
50.3
28.3
57.3
33.8
18.6
15.0
25.7
17.9
04.8
15.4
11.8
48.3
26.2
U
D
Char
Liquids
Gas
I 1.0
39.2
-45.0
-40.6
7.6
71.8
10.1
20.9
-73.6
- 1.2
8.7
-23.4
-29.5
102.5
-45.8
1819
Change (%)
Ratio
O"
H/C
O/C
2.4
2.1
2.4
2.3
2.4
2.2
3.2
2.4
2.4
1.8
14.1
20.9
11.8
17.0
17.7
16.8
08.2
38.0
13.8
13.0
0.028
0.028
0.028
0.029
0.030
0.027
0.036
0.041
0.029
0.022
0.17
0.27
0.14
0.21
0.22
0.21
0.09
0.64
0.17
0.15
47.0
50.2
54.6
53.5
55.4
34.2
41.2
48.9
16.7
53.2
6.0
6.4
6.3
6.5
7.3
7.8
7.4
6.1
7.4
6.3
46.9
43.5
39.1
39.5
34.6
57.1
51.2
44.2
75.8
40.5
0.13
0.13
0.12
0.12
0.13
0.23
0.18
0.12
0.44
0.12
14.4
7.0
14.3
35.4
23.1
51.0
44.6
46.5
49.3
34.0
6.4
6.6
7.0
4.7
7.4
6.8
7.5
14.3
6.5
6.7
70.1
67.2
79.1
60.8
71.1
41.3
46.3
38.9
44.2
59.3
0.45
0.95
0.49
0.13
0.32
0.13
0.17
0.31
0.13
0.20
State
U
D
U
D
U
D
U
D
U
D
83.6
76.7
85.3
79.5
78.9
80.0
88.8
59.5
83.7
84.7
U
D
U
D
U
D
U
D
U
D
U
D
U
D
U
D
U
D
U
D
H/C
O/C
Char
Coir pith
Corn cob
G.nut shell
Rice husk
Wood
-8.2
-9.3
48.6
-1.4
62.0
-6.8
-3.3
43.5
3.7
53.3
1.4
-8.8
4.9
9.9
-6.3
-36.4
-24.4
361.0
12.7
587.4
1.2
-25.1
-5.9
-25.9
-7.0
6.7
5.5
-7.2
-1.2
-13.0
-2.0
2.0
1.0
4.1
3.1
-38.2
7.0
65.3
118.6
-17.7
218.2
Liquid
Coir Pith
Corn cob
G.nut shell
Rice husk
Wood
1.00
0.87
0.72
0.74
0.62
1.67
73
167.3
-13.7
-30.6
-54.3
-14.7
-46.6
-59.7
-83.2
-51.8
2.3
-4.1
112.2
98.9
147.3
-33.2
-23.1
-73.0
-68.9
120.6
-7.9
-41.9
-58.2
-73.6
4.1
89.5
-16.1
83.2
-19.4
31.0
3.1
34.3
49.4
93.8
1.24
0.90
0.54
0.76
Gas<`
Coir pith
Corn cob
G.nut shell
Rice husk
Wood
4.87
9.69
5.52
1.72
3.07
0.81
1.04
0.84
O.90
1.74
a By difference
(2) on salt i m p r e g n a t i o n , the liquid decreases (by ~ 2 0 6 0 % ) a n d the gas yield increases in all cases;
(3) in general, ZnCI2 in high c o n c e n t r a t i o n increases the
gas yield (by 170%) a n d reduces the liquid yield (by
59%);
1820
The iodine a d s o r p t i o n
test was c a r r i e d o u t using the s t a n d a r d p r o c e d u r e 22
for the c h a r s f r o m u n t r e a t e d , d e m i n e r a l i z e d a n d salti m p r e g n a t e d biomass. T h e results are presented in Table
11, f r o m which it can be seen t h a t on d e m i n e r a l i z a t i o n ,
REFERENCES
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
CONCLUSIONS
Sodium, potassium, calcium, magnesium, iron, phosphorus, aluminium and silicon are the major elements
19
20
1821
1822
27
28
Pakdel, H. and Roy, C. In 'Pyrolysis Oils from Biomass, Producing, Analysing and Upgrading' (Eds J. Soltes and T. A. Milne),
Symposium Series No. 376, American Chemical Society,
Washington, DC, 1988
Piskorz, J., Scott, D. S. and Radlein, D. In 'Pyrolysis Oils from
Biomass, Producing, Analysing and Upgrading' (Eds J. Soltes
and T. A. Milne), Symposium Series No. 376, American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, 1988