Verbal Reasoning Test1 Solutions
Verbal Reasoning Test1 Solutions
Verbal Reasoning Test1 Solutions
Practice Test 1
Solution Booklet
1 www.assessmentday.co.uk
The Centre aims to reduce its carbon dioxide emissions by 20% below
2001 levels by 2010, and a significant contributor to this target will be the
improved energy efficiency of their building stock. At the same time, the
government is aiming to have 10,000 MW installed Combined Heat and
Power (CHP) capacity by 2010.
Q1 The only way to reach the carbon emissions target is by improving the energy
efficiency of buildings.
The passage says “a significant contributor to this target will be the improved energy
efficiency of their building stock”. So improving the energy efficiency is a significant
contributor, not the only way.
The passage talks about a government aim to reach a certain MW installed capacity
of CHP but no mention of legal obligations are made in the text. Therefore we cannot
say whether it is true or false.
Q3 A Combined Heat and Power unit alone will not be able to provide all the
heating requirements for the Centre.
We are told the CHP unit “would serve the heating demand for…but would not be
suited to space heating requirements” which means it would not be able to provide all
the heating requirements for the Centre.
2 www.assessmentday.co.uk
Enticing people to choose a bus over their car is difficult. Governments
have tried by improving the comfort and frequency of public transport.
However, this has little effect because people value their cars too highly.
Public opposition to governmental action on car use has already been
demonstrated through the petrol blockade.
The most likely solutions are ones that retain the most driver-convenience,
whilst retaining low cost. A popular suggestion is to improve public
transport so personal cars are needed less. This can be gradually
implemented alongside existing traffic and uses existing road systems.
Q4 Governments have in the past made public transport more comfortable and
increased its frequency.
This is implicit from the statement that “Governments have tried [enticing people to
choose a bus over their car] by improving the comfort…of public transport”. Whether
they succeeded in getting more people to use public transport is another matter.
The passage tells us this is true from the statement “governmental action on car use
has already been demonstrated through the petrol blockade”. The petrol blockade
can reasonably be considered as a demonstration.
The passage does not say whether or not traffic would increase if more people
swapped their cars for public transport. This cannot be deduced from the passage
either, since it does not say whether more or less car sharing would take place, thus
increasing or reducing the number of vehicles on the road.
3 www.assessmentday.co.uk