PEMD2014 0282 Final
PEMD2014 0282 Final
PEMD2014 0282 Final
Abstract
This paper presents a new continuous carrier-based pulse
width modulation (CPWM) method to control three-phase
direct matrix converter (DMC). This technique is based on the
equivalent indirect scheme, which models the converter as
two independent stages to perform rectification and inversion
processes. With this representation, two CPWM methods of
the rectification process are proposed. In the inversion stage,
the well-known CPWM methods of the standard voltage
source inverter (VSI) have been applied. With these
techniques, a voltage transfer ratio (VTR) of 0.937 has been
achieved in the linear modulation mode. This value is higher
than the present attainable value of 0.866. The proposed
technique has been implemented using a laboratory setup.
Measured results showed the validity of the given analysis.
1 Introduction
Three-phase matrix converter (MC) is a direct three- to threephase converter. It was firstly introduced in 1976 [1]. Due to
the progress of the power electronics technology, MC
development is growing steadily. After almost three decades
of intensive research, the development of MC has been
involved in industrial applications. In 2008, Yaskawa
Company in Japan introduces the first product of three-phase
MC. However, the industrial use of this type of the power
converter is limited, because of two main reasons; reduced
VTR (< 1) and complicated control implementation. The
converter VTR can be increased by operating in the
overmodulation region [2-4]. Some of research work to solve
complexity of the converter control algorithm has been
published using direct and indirect MC topologies. A novel
carrier based PWM modulation method is proposed in [5] to
control DMC, which does not need any sector information for
calculating the duty-ratios, and the output voltage is
synthesized to 0.866 times the amplitude of the input voltage.
This scheme also allows the input power factor to be
controlled. In [6] the unsymmetrical triangular carrier signal
is compared to the modulating signals. The inverter stage is
controlled by a variable slope carrier signal. Thus, the
implementation of this technique is complicated. However,
[7] introduces carrier based PWM for indirect matrix
converter (IMC) by comparing the modulation signals with a
SaB
SbB
ScB
SaC
SbC
ScC
vA
vB
vC
(1)
VA
VB
SaA
SbA
ScA
VC
SaB
SbB
ScB
SaC
SbC
ScC
Va
Vb
Fig. 1. Three-phase DMC topology
Vc
(2)
SaB
SbB
ScB
SaC
S7
SbC = S9
ScC
S11
S8
S10
S12
S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
(3)
1
3
5
where
T
S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
. vA
S6
vB
vC
(4)
S2
S4
S6
Rectifier Stage
(9)
S7 S9 S11
va
vb
vc
VDC
(7)
Magnitude
vA
vB
vC
Vp
+
S5
sin(i t + )
sin(i t 2/3 + )
sin(i t 4/3 + )
S1 S3
vp
= v
n
vpn = R . vin
vn
vp
2
4
6
0.5
S8 S10 S12
Vn
0
0
0.005
0.01
0.015
0.02
Time (msec)
Inverter Stage
(11)
where,
v3h = 1/2(vmax + vmin )
(12)
It was found that for this technique, the limit of the linear
modulation region is extended to 1.62Vim. The simulation
result of the modulating signals using this scheme is shown in
Fig. 6.
2
6
Vdc _max =
v d i t = 1.654Vim
2/6 0 CB
vCB = 3Vim cos i t
(10)
Vi
1 .5
VC
R2
R3
Magnitude
1
R1
VA
R4
3
V im
0
0
0.005
R6
0.01
0.015
0.02
1.654
vCB
X: 2
Y: 1.5
PWM
THI-PWM
THIPWM
with
ZSS
SYPWM
1.732
1.654
M
Mc
c
Magnitude
Time (msec)
1.5
0.005
SPWM
SPWM
Six Step
Limit
Linear
Limit
0
0.5
VB
R5
0.01
0.015
Linear
Six
Pulse
Overmodulation
0.02
0
-2
Time (msec)
-1
2 2.5
DD
S2
0
1
0
1
S3
START
K=1
0
1
S4
Read
va,vb,vc
0
1
vc > vb
v3h=-0.5vc
S5
Yes
Yes
va >vb &vc
R=1
0
1
Yes
v3h=-0.5vb
R=2
v3h=-0.5va
R=3
v3h=-0.5vc
R=4
v3h=-0.5vb
R=5
S6
No
No
0
0
Yes
vb > va & vc
va > vc
va = Vom sin(o t)
vb = Vom sin o t 2/3
vc = Vom sin o t + 2/3
No
v3h=-0.5va
vx**=vx*+v3h
R=6
x {a,b,c}
Yes
dx < 0
Sinusoidal PWM
R=1
R=6
Test R
d1=1/3(1+D.va**)
d5=1/3(1+D.vc**)
d4=1/3(1-D.vb**)
d4=1/3(1-D.vb**)
PWM Modulator
S2
S3
S4
S5
Symmetrical PWM
In order to increase the output voltage level in the linear mode
of the inverter stage, the ZSS can be applied. For SYPWM
the ZSS can be determined as follows [13];
S6
vzss =
The inverter side VTR (MI) is defined as the ratio between the
peak value of the output phase voltage (Vom) and the average
value of the virtual input dc voltage. A general representation
of the inverter modulating signals ei (i=a, b and c) for threephase carrier PWM modulators is as follows;
ei = vi + vzss
(14)
dx = 0
No
S1
T/2
x {a,b,c}
dx=1/3(1D.vx**)
k=k+1
3T/4
where vzss is the injected zero sequence signal, and vi* is called
sinusoidal reference signal and it is defined as a function of
the output frequency (o) as follows;
Yes
vb > va
Duty cycle
limiter
T/2
No
No
T/4
1
2
vmin
+ vmax
where
= , ,
(15)
and
= , ,
(13)
vab
vbc
va
vb
Fig. 10. Experimental waveforms for output side linevoltages (top trace) and phase-voltages (bottom trace) for
peak input voltage of 100V and output frequency of 10Hz
where both stages are in linear-mode.
ia
ib
1.5
1.62
1.654
SPWM
0.5
0.75
0.81
0.827
With ZSS
0.577
0.866
0.937
0.955
0.5A/Div
ISO
0.636
0.955
1.03
1.053
Fig. 11. Experimental waveforms for output line-currents
(top trace) and its spectrum (bottom trace) for linear-mode.
5 Conclusions
In this paper a new CPWM scheme of the three-phase DMC
is presented. This method based on the indirect equivalent
model of DMC. The maximum possible VTR of the DMC
using this technique is found to be 1.03 with inverter stage
over-modulation only, 0.955 with rectifier stage overmodulation only and is 1.053 with both rectifier and inverter
stages overmodulation, whilst, the total harmonic distortion of
the output current and the lowest order harmonics are
increased. Moreover, the voltage transfer ratio can be
increased to 0.937 with simultaneous input and output in
linear mode. In addition, the proposed scheme allows the
input power factor to be controlled. The theoretical analysis
of the proposed modulation scheme is confirmed by
experimental results.
vab
vbc
vbc
References
L. Gyugyi, B. R. Pelly. Static Power Frequency ChangersTheory, Performance and Application, New York: J. Wiley,
(1976).
[2] Y. Tamai, I. Sato, A. Odaka, H. Mine, and J. Itoh, A Novel
Control Strategy for Matrix Converters in the Overmodulation
Range, Electrical Engineering in Japan, Vol. 168, No. 4,
2009. Translated from Denki Gakkai Ronbunshi, Vol. 127, No.
8, pp. 858865, (2007)
[3] Z. Jian-lin, L. Wei-hong, X. Li-dan, L. Sha-sha, C. Cai-xue,
Two Methods for AC-AC Matrix Converter to Increase
Voltage Transfer Ratio, Natural Science Journal of Xiangtan
University, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 113-120, (2008).
[4] S. M. Dabour, and E. M. Rashad, Improvement of Voltage
Transfer Ratio of Space Vector Modulated Three-Phase Matrix
Converter, Proc. of the 15thInternational Middle East
Power Systems Conference, Egypt, Paper ID 232, pp. 581586,( 2012)
[5] K. Mohapatra; P. Jose; A. Drolia; G. Aggarwal; S. Thuta, A
Novel Carrier-Based PWM Scheme for Matrix Converters that
is Easy to Implement," Power Electronics Specialists
Conference, 2005. PESC '05 IEEE 36th, vol., no., pp.2410,
2414, (2005)
[6] T. Nguyen, H. Lee, "Generalized carrier-based PWM method
for indirect matrix converters," Sustainable Energy
Technologies, IEEE 3rd International Conference on, pp.223228, (2012)
[7] Y. Li. N. Choi "Carrier Based Pulse Width Modulation for
Matrix Converters," Applied Power Electronics Conference
and Exposition, 2009. APEC2009. Twenty-Fourth Annual
IEEE, vol., no., pp.1709, 1715, 15-19 (2009)
[8]
A. Iqbal, E. Levi, M. Jones, S.N. Vukosavic. "Generalised
Sinusoidal PWM with Harmonic Injection for Multi-Phase
VSIs," Power Electronics Specialists Conference, 2006. PESC
'06. 37th IEEE , vol., no., pp.1,7,(2006)
[9]
A. M. Trzynadlowski. "Non-sinusoidal modulating functions
for three-phase inverters," IEEE Transactions on Power
Electronics, vol.4, no.3, pp.331,338, (1989)
[10] S. M. Dabour, E. M. Rashad, "Analysis and implementation of
SVM three-phase matrix converter," Power Electronics, IET,
vol.5, no.8, pp.1374,1378, (2012)
[1]
va
vb
ia
ib