The Evidence of Volume Variance Relationship in Blending and Homogenization Piles Using Stochastic Simulations
The Evidence of Volume Variance Relationship in Blending and Homogenization Piles Using Stochastic Simulations
The Evidence of Volume Variance Relationship in Blending and Homogenization Piles Using Stochastic Simulations
10/10/09
9:04 AM
Page 235
MARQUES, D.M., COSTA, J.F.C.L., RIBEIRO, D.T. and KOPPE, J.C. The evidence of volume variance relationship in blending and homogenization piles
using stochastic simulations. Fourth World Conference on Sampling & Blending, The Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, 2009.
Homogenization piles are largely used in the mining industry for variability reduction in the head
grades from the ores feeding the processing plants. Variability reduction in large piles is based on
the principle volume-variance relationship, i.e. the larger is the support the smaller is the
variability. The methodology proposed combines chevron type piles and geostatistical simulation
to emulate the in situ and the pile reclaimed grade variability. Based on a pre-defined mining
sequence to select the blocks that will form each pile for each simulated block model, the
statistical fluctuation of the grades derived from real piles can be simulated, at different pile sizes
and number of layers used in pile construction. Using this methodology, one can evaluate within a
certain time period the expected grade variability for various pile size and, also, the internal grade
variability when a given pile is reclaimed. The results forecasted by the method were compared
against the real grades obtained by the grade control system used at a large iron mine operated by
Vale during 2004.
Keywords: piles, homogenization, variability reduction, iron ore.
Introduction
Ore recovery at mineral processing plants can be affected
by head grade variability. Generally, ore recovery is
maximized when head grades, from the ore feeding the
plant, are kept within narrow intervals of variation. The
reduction in this interval of grade feed variability can be
reached via adequate mining scheduling, finding the most
feasible stationary mining route and/or homogenizing ore
using large blending piles.
Ore heterogeneity can be evaluated on several scales. The
types of heterogeneities found during ore preparation are
related, essentially, with the geological processes involved
in the mineral deposit genesis and with the equipment and
methods used in mining, handling and transporting this ore.
According to Schofield (1980)1, shipment, transportation,
comminution, storage and handling contribute in some way
to the variability found in the grades, since they introduce
certain amount of reverse structuring on the space
distribution of the natural mineralization.
Parker (1979) 2 shows the intrinsic relation between
support (volume) of a lot and grade variability. The
quantification of volume variance relationship demands the
knowledge of mineralization methods and the use of proper
geostatistical methods.
Most estimation techniques provide a block model with
grades assigned to each block using the methods of kriging.
(Matheron, 1963)3. This block model is inappropriate for
accessing the uncertainty associated with the estimated
grades. Consequently, this procedure fails in predicting
grade fluctuations correctly. Geostatistical simulations aim
rather, at reproducing in situ variability, provided that the
spatial continuity of the input data set is respected. The
simulated model is said to be conditionally simulated, if it
honors the values that are obtained at sampled points while
Methodology
Before starting the analysis on the variability reduction with
the increase of the pile mass, it is necessary to understand
all variability sources influencing the system, namely:
Intrinsic variability of the ore grades from Mine 1
Intrinsic variability of the ore grades from Mine 2
Variability of the grades, which feed the
homogenization system (pre-pile combining ore from
several mining benches from the two mines)
Variability among grades coming from different
homogenization piles (variability inter-piles depending
on pile mass).
Figure 1 displays a schematic representation of the
235
10/10/09
9:04 AM
Page 236
SiO2 (%)
SiO2 (%)
SiO2 (%)
SiO2 (%)
Paper 30:text
Figure 1. Diagram showing a typical blending system used at some Brazilian iron mines. Black dots represent the locations where samples
were obtained
Variance
Figure 2. Volume-variance relationship. As the mass of the lot analyzed increases (mass of the pile) (a), the variance among the grades
reduces (b)
236
Paper 30:text
10/10/09
9:04 AM
Page 237
Mine 2
The lots analyzed at each shift weights 8.2 ktonnes on
average with a 3.2 ktonnes standard deviation, (Figure 5a).
The SiO2 average grade mined along 2004 is 2.64% with a
standard deviation of 1.42%. Grades from mine 2 are more
erratic than the ones from mine 1. Figure 4b presents the
time series for all grades from ore lots produced at mine 2
along 2004.
It can be noticed at Figure 3b and 5b, the large variability
from SiO2 produced along each shift at each mine. This
variability would lead to a yield reduction at the processing
plant with obvious operational problems.
It can be verified that practically all the sampled values
fall in the upper-lower uncertainty limits predicted by the
50 simulations. Note, that there is not a direct block to
block (block grades predicted by simulation and the block
sampled at the blending system) correspondence at plot 5
and 6. As it is not possible to identify within a given month
the exact sequence of blocks mined, probably the sequence
of blocks (scheduled) used for the simulations do not match
the real one adopted at the mine. This leads to a few
readings (real grades) plotting outside the predicted limits.
Pre pile variability
The pre pile material includes ROM from the two mines. It
is the combination of the ore from mine 1 and 2. The lots
SiO2 (%)
Frequency
Mine 1
The average mass of the lots analysed during a shift is 8.6
ktonnes with a standard deviation of 2 ktonnes (Figure 3a).
The SiO2 average grade mined along the year was 2.21%
with a standard deviation of 1.07%. Figure 3b presents the
time series for all grades from ore lots produced at mine 1
along 2004.
SiO2 (%)
Figure 3. (a) Histogram for the mass of the lots (b) SiO2 grades at each 8.6 ktonnes lot along 2004
Figure 4. SiO2 grades at each 8.6 ktonnes lot along 2004 (red dots), upper (green line) and lower (blue) bound for simulated SiO2 grades
237
10/10/09
9:04 AM
Page 238
SiO2 (%)
Frequency
Paper 30:text
SiO2 (%)
Figure 5. (a) Histogram for the mass of the lots (b) SiO2 grades at each 8.2 ktonnes lot along 2004
Frequency
SiO2 (%)
Figure 6. SiO2 grades at each 8.2 ktonnes lot along 2004 (red dots), upper (green line) and lower (blue line) bounds for SiO2 grades
Figure 7. (a) Histogram for the masses of the lots of pre-pile material (b) time series depicting SiO2 grades from the pre pile material (mine
1 + mine 2) along 2004
238
10/10/09
9:04 AM
Page 239
SiO2 (%)
Paper 30:text
Figure 8. SiO2 grades at each 19 ktonnes lot along 2004 (red dots), upper (green line) and lower (blue line) bounds for SiO2 grades
SiO2 (%)
Frequency
Figure 9. (a) Chevron type pile. (b) Sketch presenting the homogenization scheme used at Vales iron ore mines
Figure 10. (a) Histogram for the mass of piles formed along 2004 (b) SiO2 grades for the 137 piles formed within the year
239
10/10/09
9:04 AM
Page 240
CV (%)
Paper 30:text
SiO2 (%)
Figure 11. Reduction on grades variability (measured by the coefficient of variation - CV) versus the mass of the piles
CV (%)
CV (%)
Figure 12. SiO2 grades at each pile along 2004 (correspond to real grades, red dots), upper (green line) and lower (blue line) bounds for
SiO2 grades obtained by sGsim and chevron pile emulator
Figure 13. (a) Variability as a function of mass, including the readings after mine 1 and 2 and after combining the ore from the two mines
(pre-pile) (b) model adjusted to the decay in variability as the pile mass increases
Table I
Comparative among SiO2 grades at different sampling stages
Sampling
point
Mine 1
Mine 2
Pre-pile
Piles
240
Average
mass
(ktonnes)
8.6
8.2
19
150
SiO2
CV (%)
Mean (%)
Min(%)
Max(%)
0.49
0.54
0.29
2.21
2.64
2.28
0.66
0.63
0.84
12.08
18.74
7.35
0.20
2.31
1.40
4.04
Conclusions
Silica variability was reduced to 40% of the initial grade's
variability by mining multiple benches and operating two
mines simultaneously. After the homogenization piles, it
was verified that it is possible to reduce in up to 75% on the
initial silica grades variability. The decay on grades
variability follows an exponential law as a function of the
mass of the pile. This corroborates the volume-variance
relationship.
The uncertainty limits can be properly forecast using
geostatistical simulation. The limits predicted included the
Paper 30:text
10/10/09
9:04 AM
Page 241
Acknowledgements
CNPq is acknowledged for supporting scholarships to
students associated with this project. Vale (Companhia Vale
do Rio Doce) is acknowledged for the continuous support
the mining engineering research team at Federal University
of Rio Grande do Sul.
References
SCHOFIELD, C.G. Homogenisation/Blending Systems
Design and Control for Minerals Processing,
TransTech Publications. 1980.
PARKER, H. The Volume Variance Relationship: A Useful
Tool for Mine Planning. Engineering and Mining
Journal, vol. 180, 1979. pp. 106123.
MATHERON, G. Principles of Geostatistics, Economic
Geology, vol. 58, 1963. pp. 12461266.
241
Paper 30:text
242
10/10/09
9:04 AM
Page 242