The CD Lens For Optical Engineering
The CD Lens For Optical Engineering
The CD Lens For Optical Engineering
876881, 2006
Printed in Great Britain.
0949-149X/91 $3.00+0.00
# 2006 TEMPUS Publications.
INTRODUCTION
The use of interference-based optical devices is
becoming a very basic and important part of the
optics industry. Solid-state lasers, photonic bandgap devices, chip-scale spectrometers and fiberoptic communications components are just some
examples of modern devices that use interference
to solve specific technological needs. It is highly
desirable that the engineering students can be
provided with related information, ideas, and
materials for improving and updating their background and their understanding of the fundamental optics, and that the optical engineers, as
educators, can be assisted in their teaching and in
their effectiveness in developing the talents of
students.
Since about a decade after the invention of the
first type of compact disks (CDs); i.e., compact
disksdigital audio, numerous science instructors
have devoted increasing attention to the use of a
CD for classroom demonstrations or laboratory
activities on diffraction patterns of a laser beam or
optical spectroscopy of various light sources
[114]. Treated as a reflecting diffraction grating
of 625 lines/mm, a standard CD that has an
angular resolution of 0.16 arc min for the firstorder diffraction [7] provides a simple, as well as
inexpensive, approach for effective displays of
visible emission spectra. Among the above cited
works, Lee and co-workers presented an interesting comparison between diffraction patterns of a
normally or obliquely incident heliumneon laser
beam obtained with a CDread-only memory
(CDROM), unused and data-written CDrecordable (CDR), and a digital versatile disk (DVD
ROM) [3]. Recent articles by Gluck [5] and Knauer
[7] have individually explored the transmission
mode of CD gratings used in optical demonstra-
THEORETICAL BACKGROUND
A grating, framework or latticework having an
even arrangement of long narrow objects with
interstices between them, can be used to disperse
light by interference between wave trains from the
interstices. Let us consider a diffraction grating of
transmission type consisting of a large number of
identical parallel fine grooves each separated by a
constant distance d. If a light beam is incident to
the grating, a multi-order diffraction pattern can
876
877
d sin n;
dR f 2 R2 1=2
f d=2 11=2 R:
where the integer n specifies the order of diffraction. It is obvious that the angle of diffraction
increases with the increase of the wavelength for a
given order. Note that the relation between wavelength and angle of diffraction sets a constraint on
the highest allowed order to be observed due to the
requirement that sin n/d 1, indicating that
the shorter the wavelength, the greater the possibility for higher-order diffraction to occur. If the
grating spacing, also known as the grating
constant, d 1.6 m 1600 nm, for instance, the
diffracted red light up to the second order can take
place, while diffraction up to the fourth order of
violet light may be visible.
A standard CD has 20 625 turns of a single
spiral of total length over 5 m, each track spaced
by 1.6 m [17]. The grooves on the CD are, therefore, nearly circular, allowing one to regard the
disk as a circular diffraction grating. Now consider
an expanded and collimated light beam passing
normally through a transparent CD whose surface
is masked with a black, matt paper disk from
which a concentric annular zone with an adequate
width has been cut out to provide an entry for the
light beam. The CD will bring the diffracted light
of a given wavelength to several foci located at
certain distances that are determined by the
allowed orders of diffraction. See Fig. 1.
Based upon the grating formula, the first-order
diffraction is governed by the equation
d sin :
or
Equation (4) is the focal-length formula for a
masked CD acting as a chromatic lens. The focal
length varies linearly with the radius of the annular
opening on the mask. One can also see that the
focal length is dependent on wavelength, suggesting that the CD possesses obviously chromatic
aberration. The CD that is acting as a lens actually
has the property of forming a real inverted image
of a point on the axis, as does a typical converging
lens, but by a process of diffraction instead of
refraction. It is also due to focusing by wavelength-dependent diffraction that the chromatic
aberration of the CD lens is much more severe
than a traditional lens made of optical glass. While
the focal length of a typical glass lens is slightly
shorter for light of a shorter wavelength, the focal
length of the CD lens decreases as the wavelength
is increased for a fixed radius in use. Because
/d < 1, it is of interest to examine the binomial
expansion of Equation (4). Some simple steps of
manipulation lead to
f Rd=1 =d 2 1=2
d= =d=2 =d3 =8 . . . R; 5
indicating that the CD lens is even more chromatic
than a Fresnel zone plate, which can focus light
through diffraction and whose focal length is
inversely proportional to the wavelength [16].
878
Fig. 4. Formation of foci of colour components. Distinct patterns are revealed at different positions of the movable screen.
879
Table 1. Averaged values each taken from four distinct measurements (first row) in comparison with theoretically predicted ranges
of focal lengths for various colour components from normally incident white light (second row). The subscripts R, O, Y, G, B, and
V stand for red, orange, yellow, green, blue, and violet, respectively. Numerical data underlined are those beyond the predicted
lower bound. All units are in cm
Focal lengths of different colours
Radius of
opening R
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
fO
fR
4.4
3.7
4.6
5.6
6.5
7.4
8.4
fY
4.5
4.7
5.6
6.0
5.8
6.5
7.0
7.0
7.0
7.7
8.2
7.9
8.9
9.3
9.6
10.2
10.5
11.0
9.3
11.5
11.7
fG
4.8
5.0
6.2
7.5
8.7
10.0
11.2
6.6
7.5
8.5
10.0
10.5
13.0
12.5
fB
5.5
5.6
6.7
8.0
9.4
10.7
12.0
13.4
7.5
8.0
8.7
10.7
11.9
14.0
fV
6.0
6.2
8.5
7.8
9.0
9.3
9.6
10.9
11.5
12.4
13.0
14.0
16.0
15.5
6.5
7.2
9.0
10.8
12.5
14.3
16.1
17.9
8.9
10.1
11.2
14.0
17.0
18.0
8.2
10.2
12.3
14.3
16.4
18.4
20.4
Slope
2.120
2.274
2.486
2.701
3.001
3.528
0.038
0.021
0.043
0.051
0.077
0.077
Standard
deviation
0.368
0.207
0.412
0.495
0.743
0.739
obs (nm)
683
644
597
555
506
436
10
5
9
9
12
9
Accepted range of
wavelength [18]
630760
595630
560595
490560
430490
380430
880
numerical values of slopes with correlation coefficients r > 0.974, as shown in the second column of
Table 2. The results for obs agreed to within their
mutual errors. From the slope of each line, c, the
weighted average of wavelength can be deduced
using
dc2 11=2 1600c2 11=2 nm,
given by Equation (4). The results are listed in
the obs column in Table 2. The obtained wavelength associated with orange yields a precision of
0.8% and any of the others a precision of 2%. For
comparison, listed also are the accepted ranges of
each major colour in the visible spectrum. They are
found in the last column. It is obvious from Table
2 that the experimental values, within their uncertainties, are in agreement with the accepted results
in general. The observed wavelengths, however, all
seem to suffer an appreciably systematic red shift.
Adopting the midpoint of each wavelength range
as the accepted value, one can see that the estimated wavelengths are 310% higher than the
accepted values except for the red one, which is
2% below. The calculated wavelengths for the
orange and blue are apparently outside the
accepted ranges and the deduced value for the
orange differs by at least 10 nm in comparison
with the upper limit of the wavelengths of orange
light. It is worth mentioning again that all of the
observers, when carrying out the experiment,
encountered a common difficulty of picking the
orange focus out accurately and that they all
suffered from a difficulty in discerning blue and
violet foci. Their similar procedures; i.e., moving
the screen that was, at the beginning, just behind
the CD further away to locate an image, may have
added to the contribution of the apparent tendency
of the shift.
We qualitatively observed second-order focused
images at points closer to the disk. A primary
obstacle, in addition to the images being fainter,
existed that hindered us from taking the measurements effectively. This was due to the third-order
images of shorter wavelengths merging with the
REFERENCES
1. H. Brouwer, Line spectra using a CD disc, Journal of Chemical Education, 69 (1992), p. 829.
2. A. Byrne, Compact disk spectroscopes revisited! The Physics Teacher, 41 (2003), pp. 144145.
3. H.-Y. Chen, K.-X. Yang and W. Lee, Diffraction experiments with compact disks, Chinese Physics
Education (Taipei), 5 (2001), pp. 4651.
4. M. G. Cornwell, CD means colourful diffraction, Physics Education, 28 (1993), pp. 1214.
5. P. Gluck, Compact disk optics, The Physics Teacher, 40 (2002), pp. 468469.
6. J. E. Kettler, The compact disk as a diffraction grating, American Journal of Physics, 59 (1991),
pp. 367368.
7. T. Knauer, A compact disk transmission spectroscope, The Physics Teacher, 40 (2002),
pp. 466467.
8. H. Kruglak, The compact disc as a diffraction grating, Physics Education, 26 (1991), pp. 255256.
9. H. Kruglak, Diffraction demonstration with a compact disc, The Physics Teacher, 31 (1993), p. 104.
10. R. C. Mebane and T. R. Rybolt, Atomic spectroscopy with a compact disc, Journal of Chemical
Education, 69 (1992), p. 401.
11. C. Noldeke, Compact disc diffraction, The Physics Teacher, 28 (1990), pp. 484485.
12. J. Tellinghuisen, Exploring the diffraction grating using a HeNe laser and a CDROM, Journal of
Chemical Education, 79 (2002), pp. 703704.
13. F. Wakabayashi, K. Hamada and K. Sone, CDROM spectroscope: A simple and inexpensive tool
for classroom demonstrations on chemical spectroscopy, Journal of Chemical Education, 75 (1998),
pp. 15691970.
Wei Lee earned his M.Sc. degree in electro-optical engineering from National Chiao Tung
University, Taiwan, in 1987 and his Ph.D. degree in physics from the University of
Alabama at Birmingham, AL, in 1993. He was a Visiting Assistant Professor of physics
and astronomy at the University of Toledo, OH, between 1994 and 1997. In 1997, he joined
the faculty at Chung Yuan Christian University, where he currently holds the positions of
Professor of Physics and Director of the Section for Research Promotion at the university's
Office of Research and Development. He has worked in the areas of liquid-crystal
photonics, flat panel displays, laboratory astrophysics, structural vibration analysis and
physics education since 1985. Dr. Lee serves as a councilor of the ROC Taiwan Liquid
Crystal Society and the sole editor of the TLCS Briefs magazine, which is published online
biannually.
Po-Chun Lin was a student at Taipei Jing-Xing Junior High School in the Wen-Shan
District of Taipei City at the time of conducting this study. She is now a student at Taipei
Jing-Mei Girls High School, Taiwan.
Chun-Kai Tseng was a student at Taipei Jing-Xing Junior High School, Taipei, Taiwan at
the time of conducting this study. He is now a senior high school student at Taipei
Municipal Muzha Vocational High School in Taiwan.
881