Performance Appraisal System For Teachers (Past) : Emma F. Gutierrez Iv - Mimaropa
Performance Appraisal System For Teachers (Past) : Emma F. Gutierrez Iv - Mimaropa
Performance Appraisal System For Teachers (Past) : Emma F. Gutierrez Iv - Mimaropa
IV - MIMAROPA
Equivalent
Region:
Poor
Rating Period:
PINA.EAST. DIST.
Unsatisfactory
District/Division:
School:
Satisfactory
EMMA F. GUTIERREZ
Very satisfactory
Name:
Outstanding
10
Rating
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
Assesment
12. Diagnoses learner's needs
13. Evaluates learning outcomes
14. Assesses lesson to etermine desired outcomes within the alloted time
8
8
8
8
8
128
3.60
8
8
1.6
8
8
8
8
8
40
0.40
5.60
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
PERFORMANCE INDICATOR
10
Rating
8
8
8
80
1.6
8. Stress Toierance
9. Fairness / Justice
10. Proper Attire / Grooming
Total Score
Sub-Rating [(Total score / 10) 20% ]
III. PUNCTUALITY / ATTENDANCE (10%) (Including meetings & required school activities)
8
8
16
0.80
8.00
GRAND TOTAL
Plus Factor
(.5 for each indicator but not to exceed 2 points for the total)
For Teachers
1.
Conducted action research whose findings and recommendations have been adopted by the school/district
3.
4.
Published at least one (1) article in professional magazine/periodicals related to field of specialization
2.
3.
Conducted action research (es), the finding/results on which were utilized within the rating period
4.
I.
3.60
0
1.60
0.40
1.6
0.80
8.00
A. Lesson planning and Delivery (45% for Teachers, 40% for MT)
B. Technical Assistance (20% for Teachers, 10% for MT's)
C. Learners' Achievement (5% for Teachers, 5% for MTS
D. School, Home and Community Involvement (0% for Teachers, 15% for MT)
II.
8.36
Over-All Rating
VS
Descriptive Rating
REMARKS
RATEE:
CONFERRED WITH:
EMMA F. GUTIERREZ
REY D. SENORIN
Head Teacher III
CONFORME:
Siganature of Ratee
RECOMMENDING APPROVAL:
APPROVED BY:
MA. MAGDALENA D. LO
= Outstanding
6.60 - 8.59
= Very Satisfactory
4.60 - 6.59
= Satisfactory
2.60 - 4.59
= Unsatisfactory
= Poor
3.4
1.05
0.8
0.4
1.96
0.9
8.51
IV - MIMAROPA
Equivalent
Region:
Poor
Rating Period:
PINA.EAST. DIST.
Unsatisfactory
District/Division:
School:
Satisfactory
GINA A. GUTIERREZ
Very satisfactory
Name:
Outstanding
10
Rating
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
Assesment
12. Diagnoses learner's needs
13. Evaluates learning outcomes
14. Assesses lesson to etermine desired outcomes within the alloted time
8
8
8
8
8
128
3.60
8
8
1.6
8
8
8
8
8
40
0.40
5.60
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
PERFORMANCE INDICATOR
10
Rating
8
8
8
80
1.6
8. Stress Toierance
9. Fairness / Justice
10. Proper Attire / Grooming
Total Score
Sub-Rating [(Total score / 10) 20% ]
III. PUNCTUALITY / ATTENDANCE (10%) (Including meetings & required school activities)
10
10
20
1.00
8.20
GRAND TOTAL
Plus Factor
(.5 for each indicator but not to exceed 2 points for the total)
For Teachers
1.
Conducted action research whose findings and recommendations have been adopted by the school/district
3.
4.
Published at least one (1) article in professional magazine/periodicals related to field of specialization
2.
3.
Conducted action research (es), the finding/results on which were utilized within the rating period
4.
I.
3.60
0
1.60
0.40
1.6
1.00
8.20
A. Lesson planning and Delivery (45% for Teachers, 40% for MT)
B. Technical Assistance (20% for Teachers, 10% for MT's)
C. Learners' Achievement (5% for Teachers, 5% for MTS
D. School, Home and Community Involvement (0% for Teachers, 15% for MT)
II.
8.20
Over-All Rating
VS
Descriptive Rating
REMARKS
RATEE:
CONFERRED WITH:
GINA A. GUTIERREZ
REY D. SENORIN
Head Teacher III
CONFORME:
Siganature of Ratee
RECOMMENDING APPROVAL:
APPROVED BY:
MA. MAGDALENA D. LO
= Outstanding
6.60 - 8.59
= Very Satisfactory
4.60 - 6.59
= Satisfactory
2.60 - 4.59
= Unsatisfactory
= Poor
3.4
1.05
0.8
0.4
1.96
0.9
8.51
IV - MIMAROPA
Equivalent
Region:
Poor
Rating Period:
PINA.EAST. DIST.
Unsatisfactory
District/Division:
School:
Satisfactory
EMMA F. GUTIERREZ
Very satisfactory
Name:
Outstanding
10
Rating
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
Assesment
12. Diagnoses learner's needs
13. Evaluates learning outcomes
14. Assesses lesson to etermine desired outcomes within the alloted time
8
8
8
8
8
128
3.60
8
8
1.6
8
8
8
8
8
40
0.40
5.60
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
PERFORMANCE INDICATOR
10
Rating
8
8
8
80
1.6
8. Stress Toierance
9. Fairness / Justice
10. Proper Attire / Grooming
Total Score
Sub-Rating [(Total score / 10) 20% ]
III. PUNCTUALITY / ATTENDANCE (10%) (Including meetings & required school activities)
8
8
16
0.80
8.00
GRAND TOTAL
Plus Factor
(.5 for each indicator but not to exceed 2 points for the total)
For Teachers
1.
Conducted action research whose findings and recommendations have been adopted by the school/district
3.
4.
0.08
Published at least one (1) article in professional magazine/periodicals related to field of specialization
2.
3.
Conducted action research (es), the finding/results on which were utilized within the rating period
4.
I.
3.60
0
1.60
0.40
1.6
0.80
8.00
A. Lesson planning and Delivery (45% for Teachers, 40% for MT)
B. Technical Assistance (20% for Teachers, 10% for MT's)
C. Learners' Achievement (5% for Teachers, 5% for MTS
D. School, Home and Community Involvement (0% for Teachers, 15% for MT)
II.
8.00
Over-All Rating
VS
Descriptive Rating
REMARKS
RATEE:
CONFERRED WITH:
EMMA F. GUTIERREZ
ROBERTO S. CAPER
Head Teacher III
CONFORME:
Siganature of Ratee
RECOMMENDING APPROVAL:
APPROVED BY:
MA. MAGDALENA D. LO
= Outstanding
6.60 - 8.59
= Very Satisfactory
4.60 - 6.59
= Satisfactory
2.60 - 4.59
= Unsatisfactory
= Poor
3.4
1.05
0.8
0.4
1.96
0.9
8.51
IV - MIMAROPA
Equivalent
Region:
Poor
Rating Period:
PINA.EAST. DIST.
Unsatisfactory
District/Division:
School:
Satisfactory
BRENDA A. MONTIANO
Very satisfactory
Name:
Outstanding
10
Rating
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
Assesment
12. Diagnoses learner's needs
13. Evaluates learning outcomes
14. Assesses lesson to etermine desired outcomes within the alloted time
8
8
8
8
8
132
3.71
8
8
1.6
8
8
10
10
10
46
0.46
5.77
8
10
8
8
10
10
8
PERFORMANCE INDICATOR
10
Rating
8
8
10
88
1.76
8. Stress Toierance
9. Fairness / Justice
10. Proper Attire / Grooming
Total Score
Sub-Rating [(Total score / 10) 20% ]
III. PUNCTUALITY / ATTENDANCE (10%) (Including meetings & required school activities)
10
10
20
1.00
8.53
GRAND TOTAL
Plus Factor
(.5 for each indicator but not to exceed 2 points for the total)
For Teachers
1.
Conducted action research whose findings and recommendations have been adopted by the school/district
3.
4.
Published at least one (1) article in professional magazine/periodicals related to field of specialization
2.
3.
Conducted action research (es), the finding/results on which were utilized within the rating period
4.
I.
3.71
0
1.60
0.46
1.76
1.00
8.53
A. Lesson planning and Delivery (45% for Teachers, 40% for MT)
B. Technical Assistance (20% for Teachers, 10% for MT's)
C. Learners' Achievement (5% for Teachers, 5% for MTS
D. School, Home and Community Involvement (0% for Teachers, 15% for MT)
II.
8.5
Descriptive Rating
VS
REMARKS
RATEE:
CONFERRED WITH:
BRENDA A. MONTIANO
WINEFREDA M. MADLA
Principal II
CONFORME:
Siganature of Ratee
RECOMMENDING APPROVAL:
APPROVED BY:
MA. MAGDALENA D. LO
= Outstanding
6.60 - 8.59
= Very Satisfactory
4.60 - 6.59
= Satisfactory
2.60 - 4.59
= Unsatisfactory
= Poor
3.4
1.05
0.8
0.4
1.96
0.9
8.51