Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 8 views

    Rodel Turner, Jr. v. Jacob Lowden, 4th Cir. (2014)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case between Rodel R. Turner, Jr. and Jacob Lowden and Bank of America. The district court had set aside the entry of default and dismissed Turner's claims of unjust enrichment and breach of contract against Lowden and Bank of America. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error. The court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd

    Rodel Turner, Jr. v. Jacob Lowden, 4th Cir. (2014)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    8 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case between Rodel R. Turner, Jr. and Jacob Lowden and Bank of America. The district court had set aside the entry of default and dismissed Turner's claims of unjust enrichment and breach of contract against Lowden and Bank of America. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error. The court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2014-03-06 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 13-2307

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case between Rodel R. Turner, Jr. and Jacob Lowden and Bank of America. The district court had set aside the entry of default and dismissed Turner's claims of unjust enrichment and breach of contract against Lowden and Bank of America. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error. The court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    8 views2 pages

    Rodel Turner, Jr. v. Jacob Lowden, 4th Cir. (2014)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case between Rodel R. Turner, Jr. and Jacob Lowden and Bank of America. The district court had set aside the entry of default and dismissed Turner's claims of unjust enrichment and breach of contract against Lowden and Bank of America. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error. The court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    You are on page 1of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 13-2307

    RODEL R. TURNER, JR.,


    Plaintiff Appellant,
    v.
    JACOB LOWDEN; BANK OF AMERICA,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Baltimore.
    Richard D. Bennett, District Judge.
    (1:12-cv-01372-RDB)

    Submitted:

    February 24, 2014

    Decided:

    March 6, 2014

    Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Rodel R. Turner, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Joshua Daniel Davey,


    MCGUIREWOODS, LLP, Charlotte, North Carolina, Craig Robert
    Haughton, MCGUIREWOODS, LLP, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Robert R. Turner, Jr., appeals the district courts
    order setting aside entry of default and dismissing this action
    alleging

    unjust

    enrichment

    and

    breach

    of

    contract.

    reviewed the record and find no reversible error.


    we

    affirm

    for

    the

    reasons

    stated

    by

    the

    We

    have

    Accordingly,

    district

    court.

    Turner v. Lowden, No. 1:12-cv-01372-RDB (D. Md. Oct. 15, 2013).


    We

    dispense

    contentions

    with
    are

    oral

    argument

    adequately

    because

    presented

    in

    the

    facts

    and

    the

    materials

    legal
    before

    this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like