Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 14 views

    Catherine Randolph v. US Attorney of Maryland, 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document summarizes two appeals by Catherine Denise Randolph of district court orders dismissing her complaints for failing to state a claim. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the records and found no reversible error. Accordingly, the appeals were dismissed for the reasons stated by the district court in its orders dismissing the complaints.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd

    Catherine Randolph v. US Attorney of Maryland, 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    14 views3 pages
    This document summarizes two appeals by Catherine Denise Randolph of district court orders dismissing her complaints for failing to state a claim. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the records and found no reversible error. Accordingly, the appeals were dismissed for the reasons stated by the district court in its orders dismissing the complaints.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2015-08-31 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 15-1497

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document summarizes two appeals by Catherine Denise Randolph of district court orders dismissing her complaints for failing to state a claim. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the records and found no reversible error. Accordingly, the appeals were dismissed for the reasons stated by the district court in its orders dismissing the complaints.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    14 views3 pages

    Catherine Randolph v. US Attorney of Maryland, 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document summarizes two appeals by Catherine Denise Randolph of district court orders dismissing her complaints for failing to state a claim. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the records and found no reversible error. Accordingly, the appeals were dismissed for the reasons stated by the district court in its orders dismissing the complaints.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    You are on page 1of 3

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 15-1497

    CATHERINE DENISE RANDOLPH,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    US ATTORNEY
    DEFENDANTS,

    OF

    MARYLAND,

    Rod

    Rosenstein,

    et

    al;

    UNKNOWN

    Defendants - Appellees.

    No. 15-1786

    CATHERINE DENISE RANDOLPH,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    LORETTA LYNCH, US Attorney
    defendants: Melvin Bright,

    General

    Respondents

    et

    al

    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeals from the United States District Court for the District
    of Maryland, at Baltimore.
    J. Frederick Motz, Senior District
    Judge. (1:15-cv-01137-JFM; 1:15-cv-02005-JFM )

    Submitted:

    August 27, 2015

    Decided:

    August 31, 2015

    Before GREGORY, AGEE, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Catherine Denise Randolph, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    In

    these

    consolidated

    appeals,

    Catherine

    Denise

    Randolph

    appeals the district courts orders dismissing her complaints


    for failing to state a claim.

    See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e) (2012).

    We

    and

    have

    reviewed

    the

    records

    find

    no

    reversible

    error.

    Accordingly, we dismiss the appeals for the reasons stated by


    the district court.

    Randolph v. US Attorney of Md., No. 1:15-

    cv-01137-JFM (D. Md. filed Apr. 30, 2015; entered May 1, 2015);
    Randolph v. Lynch, No. 1:15-cv-02005-JFM (D. Md. July 10, 2015).
    We

    dispense

    contentions

    with
    are

    oral

    argument

    adequately

    because

    presented

    in

    the

    facts

    and

    the

    materials

    legal
    before

    this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like