Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 11 views

    United States v. Swain, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed Corey Swain's appeal of the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. The appellate court found no reversible error in the district court's decision. Therefore, the court denied Swain's request for a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, finding the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd

    United States v. Swain, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    11 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed Corey Swain's appeal of the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. The appellate court found no reversible error in the district court's decision. Therefore, the court denied Swain's request for a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, finding the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1997-04-25 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 96-6910

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed Corey Swain's appeal of the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. The appellate court found no reversible error in the district court's decision. Therefore, the court denied Swain's request for a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, finding the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    11 views2 pages

    United States v. Swain, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed Corey Swain's appeal of the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. The appellate court found no reversible error in the district court's decision. Therefore, the court denied Swain's request for a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, finding the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    You are on page 1of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 96-6910

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    COREY VIDEL SWAIN,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Chief District
    Judge. (CR-93-71-F, CA-96-247-5-F)
    Submitted:

    April 17, 1997

    Decided:

    April 25, 1997

    Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior


    Circuit Judge.
    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Corey Videl Swain, Appellant Pro Se. William Arthur Webb, Assistant
    United States Attorney, Charles Edwin Hamilton, III, OFFICE OF THE
    UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying
    his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997).
    We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and
    find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of
    appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Swain, Nos. CR-93-71-F; CA-96-247-5-F
    (E.D.N.C. Apr. 23, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because
    the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
    process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like