Homosexual couples should not have the right to adopt children for several reasons:
1) Children may be exposed to inappropriate environments involving drugs, alcohol, sexuality, and lack of morality.
2) Seeing these things frequently could make them seem normal when they are not.
3) Children have the right to be raised in a family with both a mother and father to learn appropriate gender roles and behaviors.
Homosexual couples should not have the right to adopt children for several reasons:
1) Children may be exposed to inappropriate environments involving drugs, alcohol, sexuality, and lack of morality.
2) Seeing these things frequently could make them seem normal when they are not.
3) Children have the right to be raised in a family with both a mother and father to learn appropriate gender roles and behaviors.
Homosexual couples should not have the right to adopt children for several reasons:
1) Children may be exposed to inappropriate environments involving drugs, alcohol, sexuality, and lack of morality.
2) Seeing these things frequently could make them seem normal when they are not.
3) Children have the right to be raised in a family with both a mother and father to learn appropriate gender roles and behaviors.
Homosexual couples should not have the right to adopt children for several reasons:
1) Children may be exposed to inappropriate environments involving drugs, alcohol, sexuality, and lack of morality.
2) Seeing these things frequently could make them seem normal when they are not.
3) Children have the right to be raised in a family with both a mother and father to learn appropriate gender roles and behaviors.
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 2
Daniela Ardila Greiff
11B
Why people should be against homosexual parenting
Homosexual marriage is a theme that now is in everyones mouth, and that must be treated kindly and with respect for the opinion someone else may have, without considering if it is against or in favor. Tolerance is a really important thing nowadays, and a value everyone must always have in all aspects of life. Tolerance is important, because currently the society is changing the way of thinking, today is seen a plenty of homosexuals showing their true colors, asking for permission to marry other person of the same sex and for the right of adopting a child. Homosexual couples should not be able to get the right of adopting a child, for the following reasons, first, the environments the child may be involved in, second, what they may see like a normal thing, and last but not least, for the right they may lose when they are raced by LGBTI (Lesbian, Gays, Bisexual, Transsexual, Intersexual), these would be explained in the following paragraphs. Dawn Stefanowicz is a Canadian girl who wrote a letter to the United States, before they approved the homosexual marriage in all the states 1; she is talking about the homosexual parenting, because the step after approving marriage is approving parenting, this girl is against homosexual marriage, as she had to live awful things that a child should not live, for example being exposed to sexual transmission diseases for the numerous partners her dad had and the sexual abuse. This can tell us that homosexual couples are not as stable as heterosexual ones. Furthermore, she states that with all the experiences she saw her dad was being part of, while she was growing up, she did not learned the respect for morality, authority or the parenthood love. Since she was a little girl, she was exposed to a lot of parties involving drugs, alcohol, lesbianism, exhibitionism, bisexuality and more. Although, there is a lot of people which states that homosexual adoption will give more tolerance to the world, it has a little part of truth, because when a person sees something with more frequency it becomes normal, but it is not a normal thing, for a clear reason men are not able to have a baby with a man and the same thing with girls. In the letter, Dawn Stefanowicz is not generalizing what may happen to other adopted children by homosexuals parents, but she has a lot of cases where she is giving support to a lot of kids that are going through the same awful situation that she lived2. A lot of people think homosexual adoption is a suitable solution for those kids with no home. Because they are going to live in a house in decent conditions, and they may be with someone who is going to take care of the kid, but this is a 1 Eluniversal.com 2 http://www.dawnstefanowicz.org
short-term solution, because in the long-term they could be involved in situations
where they could develop insecurity, depression, fear, anxiety and sexual confusion. In addition, when a gay couple adopts a child, the kid loses the seventh right from the Universal Declaration of Rights of the Child, which states, The superior interest of a child must be guiding the principal of whom has the responsibility of their education and orientation. A two-year-old kid ignores if he or she is a boy or a girl. This identity is learned from the people that are around the kid, for this reason they have the right to be raced in a family composed by a woman and a man; where the kid can learn things of the dad and the mom, and then decide what the child wants for his life, it is common sense that if a child grows up in a family of a couple with both of them of the same sex, the child is not going to act like a normal person, since the child is going to think that being gay is a normal thing and continue in the line of his or her parents, or the kid will be unbalanced with his or her demeanor. To conclude, homosexual parenting is not a worthy thing for children and therefore for the society in a future, and it is awful the environments the child is likely to be in. The reflection of this essay is why people invests so significantly amount of money in campaigns for accepting homosexuals to the point of making it a trend, instead of supporting protests against general inequality, racism, poverty, abuse of women and more important things.
Reading The Signs of Time - A Study On Sexually Explicit English Television Programs: Its Evolution, Its Impact, and The Challenge of Evangelization To A Generation Accustomed To It