PENYERAHAN DAN PENILAIAN TUGASAN

ASSIGNMENT SUBMISSION AND ASSESSMENT

_________________________________________________________________________
OUMM3203
PROFESSIONAL ETHICS
SEPTEMBER 2016
_________________________________________________________________________
ARAHAN KEPADA PELAJAR / INSTRUCTIONS TO STUDENTS
1. Tugasan ini mengandungi SATU soalan sahaja yang disediakan dalam Bahasa
Melayu dan Bahasa Inggeris / This assignment contains only ONE question
that is set in both Malay and English.
2. Jawab dalam Bahasa Melayu atau Bahasa Inggeris. / Answer in Malay or
English.
3. Anda dikehendaki menyerahkan tugasan dalam format MsWord melainkan
dinyatakan sebaliknya. Anda tidak dibenarkan untuk menukar teks/frasa
tugasan tersebut kepada format grafik seperti .jpeg / .gif / print screen / dan
lain-lain format berkaitan. /Learners are to submit assignment only in
MsWord format unless specified otherwise. Please refrain from converting
text/phrases into picture format such as .gif / .jpeg / print screen / etc.
4. Muat turunkan templat tugasan versi bahasa yang berkenaan daripada
myINSPIRE untuk penyediaan dan penyerahan tugasan anda. Tugasan anda
hendaklah ditaip dengan menggunakan saiz fon 12 Times New Roman dan
langkau baris 1.5. / Download the language version of the assignment
template concerned from the myINSPIRE for preparation and submission of
your assignment. Your assignment should be typed using 12 point Times
New Roman font and 1.5 line spacing.
5. Tugasan anda hendaklah antara 2500 hingga 3000 patah perkataan tidak
termasuk rujukan. Bilangan perkataan hendaklah ditunjukkan di hujung
tugasan anda. Jangan menyalin soalan dan arahan tugasan dalam jawapan
anda. / Your assignment should be between 2500 to 3000 words excluding
references. The number of words should be shown at the end of your
assignment. Do not copy the assignment question and instructions to your
answer.
6. Anda dikehendaki menghantar tugasan SECARA ONLINE melalui myINSPIRE.
Sila rujuk kepada portal untuk arahan mengenai prosedur menghantar
tugasan anda secara online. Anda dinasihatkan menyimpan senaskah
tugasan yang diserahkan untuk rujukan sendiri. / You must submit your
assignment ONLINE via the myINSPIRE. Refer to the portal for instructions on
the procedures to submit your assignment online. You are advised to keep a
copy of your submitted assignment for personal reference.
7. Anda hanya boleh menghantar tugasan SEKALI sahaja dalam SATU fail. /
You can submit your assignment ONCE only in a SINGLE file.

8. Tugasan anda hendaklah diserahkan antara 31hb Okt 2016 hingga 13hb
Nov 2016. Serahan selepas 13hb Nov 2016 TIDAK akan diterima. / Your
assignment must be submitted between 31st Oct 2016 until 13th Nov
2016. Submission after 13th Nov 2016 will NOT be accepted.
9. Tugasan hendaklah disiapkan secara individu. Anda dilarang meniru tugasan
orang
lain. Anda juga dilarang sama sekali memplagiat kerja orang lain
sebagai kerja sendiri. /
Your assignment should be prepared individually. You should not copy another
persons assignment. You should also not plagiarise another persons work as
your own.
10.Sila ambil maklum tentang PENALTI yang akan dikenakan ke atas
penghantaran lewat tugasan seperti yang tertera di pekeliling pejabat
Pendaftar 6/2012 (Rujuk Registrars Announcement di myVLE). / Please take
note that PENALTY will be imposed on late submission of assignment as
specified in the Registrars Office circular 6/2012 (Refer to Registrars
Announcement in myVLE).
11.Anda perlu memastikan RESIT yang dikeluarkan bagi penghantaran tugasan
disimpan sebagai bukti penghantaran. Kegagalan mengemukakan resit dalam
sebarang isu yang timbul berkaitan penghantaran tugasan akan
mengakibatkan tugasan dianggap TIDAK dihantar / Please ensure that you
keep the RECEIPT issued upon submisson of your assignment as proof of
submission. Your assignment is considered as NOT submitted if you fail to
produce the submission receipt in any dispute arises concerning assignment
submission.
PENILAIAN / EVALUATION
Tugasan ini menyumbang sehingga 50% daripada jumlah markah kursus
berkenaan dan akan dinilai berdasarkan kepada Rubrik yang dilampirkan. / This
assignment accounts for 50% of the total marks for the course and shall be
assessed based on the Rubrics attached .
Anda akan diberikan maklum balas tentang tugasan ini sebelum Peperiksaan
Akhir Semester bermula. / You would be given feedback on the assignment
before the Final Semester Examination commences.
PLAGIARISME: POTONGAN MARKAH / PLAGIARISM: MARKS DEDUCTION
Amaran: Tugasan yang diserahkan, secara automatik, akan disemak untuk
menentukan kadar pertindihan. Jika plagiarisme dikesan, markah akan dipotong
seperti berikut: / Warning: The submitted assignment will automatically undergo
a similarity check. If plagiarism is detected, marks would be deducted as follows:

No.
1
2
3
4

% Kumpulan Pertindihan
(Similarity Group)
0 30
30.01 50
50.01 70
70.01 100

% Potongan Markah
(Marks Deduction)
0
5
10
100

Tugasan yang dikenal pasti mempunyai pertindihan tugasan bagi mana-mana

kumpulan pertindihan di atas tidak dibenarkan untuk rayuan. Bagi pelajar dalam
kategori pertindihan tugasan kumpulan 70.01-100, akses online rayuan semakan
semula tugasan bagi subjek berkaitan dilupuskan dari pilihan rayuan. /

Assignments found to have similarities under any of the categories above; will
not be entitled to apply for appeal. For learners who fall into the 70.01-100
similarities group, the access for online appeal for assignment remarking of the
subject will be disabled from the appeal options.

ASSIGNMENT QUESTION

PURPOSE
The assignment is aimed to providing learners with the opportunity to
use analytical methods of reasoning to reach a decision on an ethical
problem.
Tujuan tugasan ini adalah untuk memberi peluang kepada pelajar menggunakan
kaedah-kaedah analitikal penyebab untuk mencapai keputusan bagi sesuatu
masalah etika.
REQUIREMENT
Bribery has been and continues to be a part of the social structure of
many cultures. For example, the American Vice President, Spiro Agnew,
resigned from office after it was discovered that he took bribes while
serving as Governor of Maryland. In sports, Pakistani cricketers were
found guilty of accepting bribes in certain matches against England.
Bribery can be in many forms, such as gifts, kickbacks, donations,
contributions, share options or career promotions.
Define the act of bribery. Using the economic, legal and ethical
approaches, analyse the issue of bribery to conclusively demonstrate
its position from the moral point of view.
Rasuah telah dan kekal menjadi sebahagian daripada struktur sosial kebanyakan
budaya. Sebagai contoh, Timbalan Presiden Amerika, Spiro Agnew, bersara
selepas didapati beliau mengambil rasuah semasa bertugas sebagai Gabenor
Maryland. Dalam sukan, pemain-pemain

kriket Pakistan didapati bersalah

kerana menerima rasuah dalam perlawanan tertentu melawan England. Rasuah

boleh didapati dalam pelbagai bentuk seperti hadiah, wang sogokan, derma,
sumbangan, saham, opsyen atau kenaikan pangkat.
Takrifkan

perbuatan

rasuah.

Dengan

menggunakan

pendekatan

ekonomi,

perundangan dan etika, analisis isu rasuah untuk menunjukkan secara konklusif
kedudukannya dari pandangan moral.
_________________________________________________________________________
MUKA SURAT TAMAT / END OF PAGE

ATTACHMENT
ASSIGNMENT RUBRICS

OUMM3203 PROFESSIONAL ETHICS / SEPTEMBER 2016

Criteria

Weig
ht

Introduction Definition, history and

practice of bribery

Pengenalan - Maksud,
sajarah dan amalan
rasuah

Economic analysis on
the act of bribery

Analisis ekonomi tentang

perbuatan rasuah

0
A write-up
on bribery
was not
provided.

1.5

Penulisan
tentang
rasuah tidak
diberikan

No economic
analysis was
carried out.

Tiada analisis
ekonomi
dijalankan

Low

Fair

Above average

Excellent

The write-up was

brief and clear but
without reference
to any reputable
source.

The write-up was

adequate and clear,
but without any
reference to
reputable sources.

Penulisan ringkas
dan jelas, tetapi
tanpa mana-mana
rujukan dari sumbersumber yang
bereputasi.

Penulisan mencukupi
dan jelas, tetapi tanpa
mana-mana rujukan
dari sumber-sumber
yang bereputasi.

The write-up was

detailed and
clear with
adequate
references from
reputable
sources.

Arguments were
based on
microeconomic
theories and
market forces but
were brief and
unclear.

Arguments were
based on
microeconomic
theories and market
forces and were
adequate and clear.

The write-up was

brief and unclear
and without
references to any
reputable source

Penulisan ringkas
dan tidak jelas dan
tanpa mana-mana
rujukan dari sumbersumber yang
bereputasi
Arguments were
not based on
microeconomic
theories and
market forces.

Hujah-hujah tidak
berdasarkan teoriteori mikroekonomi
dan kuasa-kuasa
pasaran.

Hujah-hujah
berdasarkan teoriteori mikroekonomi
dan kuasa-kuasa
pasaran tetapi
ringkas dan tidak
jelas.

Hujah-hujah
berdasarkan teoriteori mikroekonomi
dan kuasa-kuasa
pasaran dan
mencukupi serta jelas.

Penulisan sangat
terperinci dan jelas
dengan rujukan
yang mencukupi
dari sumber-sumber
yang bereputasi.
Arguments were
based on
microeconomic
theories and
market forces
and were very
detailed and
clear. Some
cost/benefit data
illustrations were
given.
Hujah-hujah
berdasarkan teoriteori mikroekonomi
dan kuasa-kuasa
pasaran dan sangat
terperinci dan jelas.
Beberapa ilustrasi
data kos/faedah
diberikan.

Max
Mark
s

12

Legal analysis on the

act of bribery

Analisis perundangan
tentang perbuatan rasuah

No legal
analysis was
carried out.

Ethical analysis on the

act of bribery

Tiada analisis
perundangan
dijalankan

No ethical
analysis was
carried out.

Arguments were
not based on the
legal framework
and social forces.
Hujah-hujah tidak
berdasarkan rangka
kerja perundangan
dan kuasa-kuasa
sosial .

Arguments based
on ONE ethical
theory were
clearly provided.

Arguments were
based on the legal
framework and
social forces but
were unclear and
brief.

Arguments were
based on the legal
framework and
social forces and
were clear and
adequate.

Arguments based
on the legal
framework and
social forces
were clear and
detailed.

Hujah-hujah
berdasarkan rangka
kerja perundangan
dan kuasa-kuasa
sosial tetapi jelas
dan ringkas

Hujah-hujah
berdasarkan rangka
kerja perundangan
dan kuasa-kuasa
sosial jelas dan
mencukupi.

Hujah-hujah
berdasarkan rangka
kerja perundangan
dan kuasa-kuasa
sosial jelas dan
terperinci.

Arguments based
on TWO ethical
theories were
clearly provided.

Arguments based
on THREE ethical
theories were
clearly provided.

Arguments based
on FOUR ethical
theories were
clearly provided.

12

3
Analisis etika tentang
perbuatan rasuah
Conclusion

Kesimpulan

Tiada analisis
etika
dijalankan
2

No
conclusion
was
provided on
the outcome
of the
analysis.
Tiada
kesimpulan
diberikan
berkenaan

Hujah-hujah
berdasarkan SATU
teori etika diberikan
secara jelas
The conclusion on
the outcome of
the analysis was
superficial and
incomplete.
Kesimpulan
mengenai hasil
analisis adalah cetek
dan tidak lengkap.

Hujah-hujah
berdasarkan DUA
teori etika diberikan
secara jelas
The conclusion on
the outcome of
the analysis was
adequate but
partially
complete.
Kesimpulan
mengenai hasil
analisis adalah
mencukupi tetapi
separa lengkap.

Hujah-hujah
berdasarkan TIGA
teori etika diberikan
secara jelas
The conclusion on
the outcome of the
analysis was
adequate and
complete.
Kesimpulan mengenai
hasil analisis
mencukupi dan
lengkap.

Hujah-hujah
berdasarkan EMPAT
teori etika diberikan
secara jelas
The conclusion on
the outcome of
the analysis was
detailed and
complete.
Kesimpulan
mengenai hasil
analisis sangat
terperinci dan
lengkap.

12

tentang hasil
analisis.

Total points

12.5

50