International Journal of Literature and Arts

2016; 4(1-1): 5-12

Published online November 2, 2015 (http://www.sciencepublishinggroup.com/j/ijla)
doi: 10.11648/j.ijla.s.2016040101.12
ISSN: 2331-0553 (Print); ISSN: 2331-057X (Online)

On Comparative Literature
Elmas Sahin
Department of Turkish Language and Literature, Faculty of Arts and Science, a University, Mersin, Turkey

Email address:
elmassahin@cag.edu.tr

To cite this article:

Elmas Sahin. On Comparative Literature. International Journal of Literature and Arts. Special Issue: World Literature, Comparative Literature
and (Comparative) Cultural Studies. Vol. 4, No. 1-1, 2016, pp. 5-12. doi: 10.11648/j.ijla.s.2016040101.12

Abstract: This study focuses on issues such as what comparative literature is or not, how it is perceived today, what its benefits
are, what kinds of mistakes are made in theory and practice in comparisons of the texts. The term 'literature' has been scene of
plentiful discussions from the Greek and Latin civilizations to our age. From philosophical approaches to literary discourses,
from poetry to tragedy, from story to novel, and the other literary genre, numerous masterpieces have been written, discussed and
criticized. From the East to the West and from the North to the South the writers have been influenced by each other's works, the
world has welcomed with an enormous world literature. Thus, comparative approaches, interactions and interests to the texts
behind the boundaries across national literatures led to the source of the birth of 'comparative literature' to be discussed in
scientific context, to be theorized, and especially flourished during 19th century. Here I want to emphasize inaccuracies in
perceptions and practices of comparative literature today, rather than to the historical development of comparative literature as an
academic discipline interested in the literature of two or more different languages, cultures or nations.

Keywords: Comparative Literature, Cultural Studies, World Literature, Theory, Practice

1. Introduction
Comparative literature is a study of the literary texts written
in different languages by the most common and simple
meaning, such that this means a study behind linguistic,
literary and cultural boundaries.
In the words of Rene Wellek, "comparative literature" as a
study of relationships between two or more literatures (Wellek
& Warren, 1949, p. 40) has been interpreted so widely or
misinterpreted so much and the term has been changed and
developed so fast from early decades of 19th century to
present. In one sense, today comparative literature embraces
'comparative cultural studies' that have borrowed some
elements (theories and methods) from comparative literature
as Totosy de Zepetnek argues in his article "From
Comparative Literature Today toward Comparative Cultural
Studies." He describes "Comparative cultural Studies" as an
approach with three areas of theoretical content:
1) To study literature (text and/or literary system) with
and in the context of culture and the discipline of
cultural studies;
2) In cultural studies itself to study literature with
borrowed elements (theories and methods) from
comparative literature; and
3) To study culture and its composite parts and aspects in

the mode of the proposed "comparative cultural

studies" approach instead of the currently reigning
single-language approach dealing with a topic with
regard to its nature and problematics in one culture
only.
Comparative literature or the comparative studies of 'other's
literatures, languages and cultures behind the boundaries;
Literary studies with comparative cultural approaches to the
other cultures as well as the other languages and literatures
make numerous contributions on literary studies, literary
criticism and theory, literary history, translation, area studies
and global studies in the result of contexts of literature and the
interactions of local or a national literature with the other
national literature/s.
In this term, the scholars interested in comparative literature
should embrace literary works and cultures in multiple
languages from a comparative perspective. Whereas when a
scholar examines only one nation's literature, literary works or
writers this will not be a comparative study.
To study or compare writers of only a national literature (for
instance the poets of modern Turkish literature) will be a
literary history or a literary research on that country. Such a
study will reveal literary values, progress or development of

Elmas Sahin:

On Comparative Literature

that nation's literature, language and culture. However when

s/he studies on different literatures, languages or cultures (for
example the poets of modern Turkish literature and English
literature) this will be a comparative study.

2. A Short History of Comparative

Literature
The word 'comparative' derived from Latin comparativus,
from comparare is an observation or judgment of similarities
or dissimilarities between two or more branches of science or
subjects of study such as comparative literature, comparative
religion, comparative language and soon.
The word comparative as an adjective was firstly used by
Shakespeare in his play King Henry IV, Part I in 1597 in the
words Falstaff's uttered to Hal, Prince of Wales: the most
comparative, rascalliest, sweet young prince." (Shakespeare,
1773, p. 235). In 1598 Francis Meres used the term as
adjective in the section titled "A Comparative Discourse of
Our English Poets with the Greek, Latin and Italian Poets" in
his book Palladis Tamia subtitled "Wits Treasury"
Meres compares Greek poets of great antiquity (like
Homer, Orpheus, Linus and Musaeus), the ancient Latin
poets (like Jovianus Pontanus, Politianus, Marullus
Tarchaniota) and the ancient Italian poets, (like Livius
Andronicus, Ennius and Plautus) to forerunners of English
literature such as Chaucer, Gower and Lydgate.
(http://www.elizabethanauthors.org/palladis.htm).
Homer
reputed the prince of Greek poets, and Petrarch of Italian
poets and Chaucer accounted the god of English poets are
compared and contrasted together with the other ancient
poets of the antiquity. We can say taht it is the first article of
studies of comparative literature.
Then the term was used in some captions of
seventeenth-and eighteenth-century books. After these
attempts at the beginnings of the nineteenth century in France
the words 'comparative' and 'literature' were used together as a
phrase in several course books.
Fernand Baldensperger largely tells in the first part
(Littrature Compare: Le Mot et la chose) of his book
(together with Paul Hazard) titled Revue de littrature
compare historically developments in French literature "Nol
and Laplace begin to publish their courses "Comparative
Literature" in 1816, and Villemain puts a preface for Tableau
of the eighteenth century (during 1827 and 1828) speaks of a
"comparative study of literature." J.J. Ampre, in his
Athenaeum's opening lesson Marseille (1830) provides
"comparative history of arts and literal temperature in all
nations" whose philosophy must leave literature and the arts."
(Baldensperger, 1921, p. 8)
Ampre brings together various studies, it is observed that
all his work is relate to the history of comparative literature
(1833). Chaudes- Aigues, modern writers of France, in 1841,
will stick to "The history of comparative literature "; Ville
main and Puibusque, in 1842 and 1843, to "the comparative
history of literally tures." Similarly, Benloew offers in Dijon

in 1849 "Introduction to the comparative history of literature.

(Baldensperger, 1921, p. 9)
On the other hand, the first time in English the phrase
comparative literature in 1848 was used in an unpublished
letter by Matthew Arnold who translated Ampre's use of
"histoire comparative." (Wellek & Warren, Theory of
Literature, 1949, p. 38).
In the private letter he wrote his mother unpublished till
1895, Mathew Arnold uses the phrase 'comparative literature'
"How plain it is now, though an attention to the comparative
literatures for the last fifty years might have instructed any one
of it, that England is in a certain sense far behind the Continent.
In conversation, in the newspapers, one is so struck with the
fact of the utter insensibility, one may say, of people to the
number of ideas and schemes" (Arnold, 1895, p. 10)
Arnold defines the term in a conference, dated 14
November 1857, titled "On the Modern Element in
Literature," printed in Macmillan's Magazine, February 1869,
in these words "Everywhere there is connexion, everywhere
there is illustration: no single event, no single literature, is
adequately comprehended except in its relation to other events,
to other literatures. (Arnold, 1914, p. 456)
When we shortly look at books published on comparative
literature, although it firstly appeared in the title of the book
named Irish scholar Hutcheson Macaulay Posnett's
Comparative Literature in 1886, it arose as an academic
discipline in the nineteenth century.
Today we recognize the contributions of the books such as
Paul Van Tieghem's La Littrature Compare (1931, Ren
Wellek and Austin Warren's Theory of Literature (1942),
Marius-Franois Guyard's La Littrature Compare (1951),
Rene Wellek's The Crisis of Comparative Literature;
Concepts of Criticism (1963), Claude Pichois and A.M.
Rousseau's La littrature compare (1967), Ulrich Weisstein's
Einfhrung in die vergleichende Literaturwissenschaft (1968),
Jan Brandt Corstius's Introduction to the Comparative Study
of Literature (1968), Henry Gifford's Comparative Literature
(1969), Siegbert S. Prawer's Comparative Literature Studies:
An Introduction (1973), C:L: Wrenn's The Idea of
Comparative Literature (1973), John B. Alphonso-Karkal's
Comparative World Literature: Essays (1974), Hugo
Dyserinck's Komparatistik: eine Einfhrung (1977), Robert J.
Clement's Comparative Literature as Academic Discipline: A
Statement of Principles, Praxis, Standards (1978), Gerhard R.
Kaiser's
Einfhrung
in
die
Vergleichende
Literaturwissenschaft
(1980),
Swapan
Majundar's
Comparative Literature: Indian Dimensions (1987), Peter V.
Zima and Johann Strutz's Komparatistik. Einfiihrung in die
Vergleichende Literaturwissenschafi (1992), Yves Chevrel's
La Littrature Compare (1989), Gurbhagat Singh's
Differential Multilogue: Comparative Literature and National
Literatures (1991), Andr Lefevere's Translating Literature:
Practice and Theory in a Comparative Literature Context
(1992), Susan Basnett's Comparative Literature: A Critical
Introduction (1993), Claudio Guillen's The Challenge of
Comparative Literature (1993); Charles Bernheimer's
Comparative Literature in the Age of Multiculturalism (1995),

International Journal of Literature and Arts 2016; 4(1-1): 5-12

Rey Chow's In the Name of Comparative Literature (1995)

George Steiner's What is Comparative Literature (1995),
Steven Ttsy de Zepetnek's Comparative Literature: Theory,
Method, Application (1998), Takayuki Yokota-Murakami's
Don Juan East/West: On the Problematics of Comparative
Literature (1998), John T. Kirby's The Comparative Reader: A
Handlist of Basic Reading in Comparative Literature (1998),
Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak's The Death of a Discipline
(2003), Haun Saussy's Comparative Literature in An Age of
Globalization (2006), Dominique Jullien's Foundational Texts
of World Literature (2011), Jacob Edmond's A Common
Strangeness:
Contemporary
Poetry,
Cross-Cultural
Encounter, Comparative Literature (2012), Steven Ttsy de
Zepetnek and Tutun Mukherjee's Companion to Comparative
Literature, World Literatures, and Comparative Cultural
Studies (2013) among the studies of literatures behind the
boundaries in the world.
As for Turkish literature nci Enginun's Mukayeseli
Edebiyat (Comparative Literature 1992), Kamil Aydn's
Karlatrmal Edebiyat: Gnmz Postmodern Balamda
Alglans (Comparative Literature and Its Perception in
Today's Postmodern Context 2008), Emel Kefeli's
Karlatrmal
Edebiyat
ncelemeleri
(Comparative
Literature Studies 2000), Grsel Ayta's Karlatrmal
Edebiyat Bilimi (The Science of Comparative Literature 1997),
Ali Osman ztrk's Karlatrmal Edebiyat Aratrmalar
(Comparative Literature Research 1999) eyda lsever's
Karlatrmal Edebiyat ve Edebi eviri (Comparative
Literature and Literary Translation 2005), Binnaz Baytekin's
Kuramsal ve Uygulamal Karlatrmal Edebiyat Bilim
(Theoretical and Applied Comparative Literature 2006),
Mesut Tekan's Karlatrmal Edebiyat Bilimi (The Science
of Comparative Literature 2012) are remarkable books for
comparative literature.
It is the fact that several comparative critical approaches
from Plato to Aristotle, Longinus, Horace, Virgil, Dante,
Seneca, Descartes, Spencer, Milton, Marlowe, Shakespeare,
Pope, Swift, Dryden, Johnson, Fielding, Coleridge,
Wordsworth, Keats, Shelley, Richardson, Addison, Byron,
Poe, Goethe and Arnold, Voltaire, Flaubert, Balzac, Lamartine,
Diderot, Boileau, Taine, Sainte-Beuve have opened a huge
window towards the Comparative Literature or the
Comparative Study of different Literatures, and by the time
the term Weltliteratur (World Literature) used by Goethe in
1827 was born, and comparative studies between literatures
have been popular.

3. Theory and Practice

What comparative literature means today is very different
from previous discourses in global context. Cultural studies
take us on reconsideration or redefinition of the term of
comparative literature. Today boundaries of comparative
literature have been expended by comparative cultural studies.
Of course, we have some chance to learn or know progress,
methods, and approaches of comparative literature by means
of theoretical and practical/applied books I mention above or

the other books; however, it can be said that we understand

neither its theory and practice nor contributions.
From past today many things have been said on
comparative literature up to now, but it will be important to
focus on what we will compare. It is very clear that we do not
know "what, why or how' we will compare, 'which works or
writers' literary worlds must be compared.
Firstly, we must answer these questions if we want to study
comparative literature. As well as necessity of a well-defined
methodological frame, we must also argue its coverage and
search for answers to the questions such as "to whom/what
will we compare us /ours? How will we compare the texts? In
other words, which texts/writers will we compare? Who are
we in the eyes of the others or who are the others in our eyes?"
Even though in Spivak's Death of a Discipline the questions
How many are we? Who are they? (Spivak, 2003, p. 70)
that she highlights should be observed for the New
Comparative Literature which leads us towards comparative
cultural studies crossing borders nowadays.
Wellek quotes Van Tieghem's definition of comparative
literature in his theoretical book "the object of comparative
literature is essentially the study of diverse literatures in their
relations with one another" (Wellek, 1970, p. 15) with Van
Tieghem's definition. Such an idea opened the doors of
different language, culture and literatures behind the
boundaries to the scholars. From perspective of comparative
literature they began to consider the forerunners, their
masterpieces and their influences on each other's in world
literature.
In this respect, we can discuss American poet Edgar Allain
Poe's influences on world poetry. For instance, a study of Poe's
influence on French poet Charles Baudelaire, Baudelaire's
influence on English poet T.S. Eliot or Turkish poet Tevfik
Fikret. Such a study will be important comparisons between
literatures. If the national literatures are isolated from world
literature; literary texts' influences, echoes, aspects and values
cannot totally be analyzed, detected and judged or evaluated.
In The Preface to Shakespeare, as Dr. Johnson expresses
"without the knowledge of many mountains, and many rivers;
so in the productions of genius, nothing can be styled excellent
till it has been compared with other works of the same kind."
(Johnson, 1842, p. 3).
Comparative literature is a key opening all doors beyond
the national, cultural, linguistic, historical, social or political
boundaries, when we turn our attentions to world literature,
we recognize echoes of a masterpiece on our literature or a
work of the other nations' literatures as translations and
imitations, frequently by second-rate authors, or to the
prehistory of a masterpiece, the migrations and the spread of
its themes and forms." (Wellek & Warren, Theory of
Literature, 1949, p. 40)
A researcher who studies literatures of other nation(s) to
local literature will notice similarities, differences, and
developments of the languages, literatures and cultures of two
or more nations by comparative approaches; and s/he will find
out common themes of the literary texts of different nations.
Thus, a comparatist will have a chance to know their

Elmas Sahin:

On Comparative Literature

influences of the texts or the writers on each other's by means

of comparative literature.
One of the most common errors in the study of comparative
literature in theory and practice is mistake that the writers and
their works of literature of a nation could be examined in the
light of the science of comparative literature. Each nation may
compare its own writers or literary works with each other's,
but this is not a comparative literature. This work is a
comparative development of that nation's literature; it is a
progressive and historical study of the products of a national
or local literature. If we want to make comparative literature
or a comparative study, we have to compare two or more
literatures of the different nations or languages, traditions or
cultures.
For instance when we compare English poets, or novelists
to each other's, we learn some things about English literature ,
but when we compare English literature to French literature,
American, Russian or Turkish literature we make comparative
literature. In that case, aspects, parallels, similarities or
developments of English and Turkish poets of ninetieth
century may be compared and contrasted by comparative
literature or comparative cultural approaches.
Of course, an English poet to another English poet(s) can be
compared but as we mention above such a study will explore
historical, social or political development, similar and
different aspects etc., of English poetry. However when an
English poet or writer is compared and contrasted to a Turkish
one, this will be a study of comparative literature.
Undoubtedly, to study her own national writers of a country
will give information about that country's literature, and this
will be a restricted study of an area, but if we want to know
other's literature(s( we need literatures of two or more
nationalities away from the boundaries of one national
language. Moreover as Wellek mentions "we need both
literary history and criticism, and we need the wide
perspective which only comparative literature can give."
(Wellek, 1970, p. 36)
Why will we make compare literature? What are its benefits?
To know theory and practice of comparative literature will
provide numerous benefits to not only comparatists but also
national, general and world literatures.
A comparative study of different literatures will present us
rich knowledge of literatures, languages, cultures and
identities of other nations, thus comparisons of products of the
different literatures will get a chance us to recognize both our
values and the other's closely.
Surely while we compare literatures of the different
countries or languages we need to break down the borders, we
have huge materials to compare synchronically or
diachronically literary genres and texts across all times and
spaces. We must read, recognize, criticize and evaluate the
other nations' literary products. We need to develop, we need
to know what the others are doing we must compare ourselves
to other's. As Matthew Arnold emphasizes we must have a
look at literatures of all periods from classical to postmodern.
We recognize similarities and dissimilarities among literatures,
and perceive and evaluate the stand they come while we make

a study of comparative literature.

We must compare the works of other ages with those of our
own age and country; that, while we feel proud of the immense
development of knowledge and power of production, which
we possess, we may learn humility in contemplating the
refinement of feeling and intensity of thought manifested in
the works of the older schools. To know how others stand, that
we may know how we ourselves stand; and to know how we
ourselves stand, that we may correct our mistakes and achieve
our deliverance -that is our problem. (Arnold, 1914, p. 457)
On the hand, in a globalized age, importance of the
translation studies is undeniable for the science of
comparative literature. To study on original texts in their own
native languages while poems, epics, tales, stories, novels or
essays of different languages are compared and contrasted will
be better than their translations.
We all know how difficult a poem to be translated into to
another language correctly? If not we know the language of an
original text we must have a well translation of the text
otherwise we will have to depend on the translated text, and
inevitable mistakes will occur in comparisons of the texts. In
this regard, to know a second language at least is an important
requirement for accurate results in comparative/cultural,
linguistic approaches to literatures as well as to learn the
methods and techniques of literary analysis and comparison of
different national literatures.
After knowing what comparative literature is in theoretical
sense, practice of comparative literature can be made on
literary genres selected among the literatures of different
nationalities. The comparatists must be careful while
determining the writers and their literary works of their own
literature and other country or countries. They must know very
much literary values of countries to be compared.
To give an example for a study of comparative literature,
the French symbolist and impressionist poet of Les Fleurs du
Mal (Flowers of Evil) and Le Spleen de Paris, influence of
Charles Baudelaire (1821-1867) on T.S. Eliot (1888-1965) in
English and Tevfik Fikret (1867-1915) in Turkish will be an
appropriate comparison for these modern poets of French,
English and Turkish nations.
Baudelaire's influence are not only on Eliot and Fikret, but
also on his country's poets and writers such as Mallarm,
Rimboud, Verlaine, Proust; both English ones such as Walter
Benjamin, Oscar Wilde, William Butler Yeats, George Moore,
Alfred Douglas, Arthur Symons, Arthur Machen; and Turkish
ones such as Cenap ahabettin, Ahmet Haim, Yahya Kemal,
Ahmet Hamdi Tanpnar, Necip Fazl, Ahmet Muhip Dranas,
Cahit Stk Taranc, Attila lhan; and on the other languages
and literatures through the national exchange transcending
cultural, socio-political and linguistic boundaries.
Each country has a Baudelaire; this varies according to each
critic. All world literatures are in a contact to each other in
today's global age. Despite of restricted technology of that
period an American or a French writer can have a great
influence directly or indirectly on another western, eastern or
far Eastern writer. In our age, these kinds of influences will be
more than past through mass media and internet.

International Journal of Literature and Arts 2016; 4(1-1): 5-12

Each of these poets is very important for their national

literatures in the first place. What about poets of their ages at
home and beyond the borders or each other's, even for world
literature? Here you need to find the answers to these
questions, explore their mysterious aspects in addition to
similarities, differences and interactions of their personalities
and poetries if we want to make a study of comparative
literature.
Baudelaire is well known as one of the world's greatest lyric
and symbolist, melancholic poets. Les fleurs du mal has been
translated into most Western and Eastern languages and its
fame has covered not only his country Frence, but also nearly
the whole world. It was translated as Flowers of Evil in
English, and as er/Ktlk/Elem iekleri in Turkish.
Due to the translations, scholars have recognized inventors
of world literature in an easier way. G. Turquet-Milnes made a
study named Influence of Baudelaire in France and England
(1913), Ali hsan Kolcu traced his influences in Turkish
literature in his book Albatros'un Glgesi (Shadow of the
Albatross, 2002).
These two scholars also examine influence of Baudelaire
from perspective of comparative literature. Turquet-Milnes
stresses, "His influence has been maintained through fifty
years of literary history, and we have found pleasure in
listening, in the works of later writers, for the magic echoes of
the voice that is still." (Turquet-Milnes, 1913, p. vi) Echoes of
this French poet in France and England or the other countries
sound in similar ways in Turkey as well. Kolcu also pays
attention influences of themes such as spleen, evening, escape,
solitude, internal closure, sexuality and erotism in
Baudelaire's poetry on Turkish poets. (Kolcu, 2002, p. 449)
In Pul Valry's words in his conference titled La Situation
de Baudelaire (The Position/Place of Baudelaire-19 Feb. 1924)
Baudelaire's poetry is "beyond his/our frontiers, it is read
throughout the world; taking its place as the characteristic
poetry of modernity... Men like Swinburne, Gabriele
d'Annunzio, and Stefan George bear magnificent witness to
the Baudelairean influence in foreign countries." (Valry,
1924)
As some poems in Fleurs du Mal (1857) derive their
content, form and some materials from Poe's poems, some
lines in Waste Land (1922) and Rubab- ikeste (Broken
Instrument, 1900) are composed and contain some borrowings
from Baudelaire'sin.
How important Fikret is as one of the major innovators in
Turkish literature, Eliot in English literature, and Baudelaire
in French literature are important in the same range more or
less. Baudelaire and Eliot are known in European and Asian,
American continents so much, but what a pity, as Fikret's
works have not been translated into the other languages, and
not introduced to world literature his fame is limited to
Turkish nations and Turkish writers.
Even Fikret has not completely been understood by his own
country's writers and critics or he has been evaluated in a
wrong way. He has been accused of being atheist by
conservatives. Narrative critical and strong style in his poems,
and harsh criticism in his poems such as Sis (Fog), Tarih-i

Kadim (Ancient History), Haluk'un Aments, (The Credo of

Haluk) and Promete (Prometheus) in terms of historical,
religious and socio-political on monarchy of his age were
greeted with disgust by at first his contemporary Mehmet Akif
Ersoy.
However, Baudelaire and Eliot have been both translated
into several languages their literary values have been
understood by native and foreign readers early or late. Our
translation agencies are very fast and hasty to translate and
introduce a western work, but they are very slow and lazy to
do the same thing for their country's ones.
Therefore, the major roles and responsibilities fall to us,
academics. Our literary figures are introduced in our articles,
books or essays more or less. Here importance of comparative
literature is incontrovertible in sense of introducing our
literary figures and their works and questioning the stand we
are.
In one sense, Fikretism in Turkey is the same way as in
Baudelairism in France or Eliotism in England but
Baudelairism in England or in Turkey is not the same thing as
in France. Of course, this situation is the same for Eliot and
Fikret as well behind the borders. Their national tempers are
different from the other nationalities' ones.
On the other hand, Baudelairian influence, or the symbolist
influence enters through not only Baudelaire, but also Shelley,
Mallerm, Verlaine, Rimbaud, Cope into English literature
and Turkish. Even Parnassian influence is much more than
symbolism on Fikret. Whereas the greatest impact on Fikret at
the time came from Cope, on Eliot from Laforgue; Fikret is
one of the greatest inventors of free verse (verse libre) in
Turkey, and Eliot in England.
When we make a comparison shortly as a practice for
comparative literature, although Baudelaire, Eliot and Fikret
are poets of different countries, but they have much more
similarities rather than differences. We see the poets think and
write by similar manners and approaches in both content and
form of their poetical styles.
How will we compare these poets? Certainly, we have to
know three of them too very well. Later our work will be to
focus on their arts. While we compare and contrast Baudelaire,
Eliot and Fikret we must study their common aspects,
similarities and differences in their interactions with each
other
When we examine their poetries we notice they are sick
poets due to the spleen of their ages. They are poets of
prose-poetry as well as the poets of spleen, sensual, moral and
psychological corruptions, spiritual conflicts, and mental and
physical illness. They are the poets who compose their poems
by symbolist, impressionist, expressionist approaches to the
nature, imaginary, sounds, colors etc.,
They are not only poets but also intelligent critics who
express their ideas on poetry in several essays. We also meets
Parnassian sides in Eliot and Fikret's poetics. Their narrative
poems consist of historical, philosophical, social and political
issues clearly, but we see spleen , love and pure symbolism
rather than these themes in Baudelaire's poems. Mostly he
gives importance music, harmony and sensuality rather than

10

Elmas Sahin:

On Comparative Literature

social problems. This does not mean that others do not value
the musicality.
Their common main motto is "art for art's sake" even
though we meet socio-political, religious and philosophical
criticisms in Eliot and Fikret's poems. London in Eliot's Waste
Land and Istanbul in Fikret's Broken Instrument are like
Baudelairean Paris spleen in prose poems of Le Spleen de
Paris or lyrical poems of Fleurs du mal, Parisian Scenes, love,
wine, rebellion, death, flowers of evil, straggles and contrasts
between good and evil, measurable people, rich and poor
dilemma and so on.
Especially we witness that the notion 'spleen' crossed their
works like a deadly illness. Paris spleen touches in English
and Turkish poets' poems. London spleen in Waste Land and
Istanbul spleen in the famous poem Fog and Iktirab
(Sorrowful/ Spleen) in the Broken Instrument that Fikret's
poems were collected.
From Greek and Latin periods Homer, Sapho, Catullus to
Classical, Modern and Postmodern periods we know the fact
that Chaucer, Milton, Shakespeare, Edgar Allan Poe,
Baudelaire, Mallarm, Rimboud, Verlaine, Valery, Yeats, Eliot,
Shelley, Keats, Fikret, Yahya Kemal, Ahmet Haim, Cahit
Stk and the others exchanged literary values to national or
across the walls, to each other. During the literary history each
gave to the other what they had, received from the other what
they had not.
Together with Baudelaire and his age is covered by Mal du
Siecle (the malady of the century), that is melancholy of their
ages passed boundaries. Eliot quotes Webster and Baudelaire
in his The Waste Land and enriches his poetical style. In the
last stanza of the first section of Waste Land, he includes the
last line of Baudelaire's 'Au Lecteur' from the preface to
Baudelaires Fleurs du Mal in his poem: "You! hypocrite
lecteur! -mon semblable, - mon frere" (Eliot, 1930, p. 16)
Baudelaire wrote the same line "Hypocrite lecteur, mon
semblable, mon frre!" (Baudelaire, Les Fleurs du Mal, 1857,
p. 7) at the end of his poem. Fikret does not quote lines of
Baudelaire's poems directly, but he uses a Baudelairian style
by similar melancholic language, similar expressions and
similar themes in his Rbab- ikeste.
Baudelaire describes eight poets- Ruben, Vinci, Rembrandt,
Michel-Ange, Puget, Watteau, Goya, Delocroix- in his verse
titled "Les Phares" and Fikret also writes six poems subtitled
-Fuzuli, Cenap (ahabettin) Nedim, stad Ekrem (Rezaizade
Mahmut), Nefi, Hamid (Abdlhak) described the famous
poets of Turkish poetry under the section "Aveng-i Tesavir"
(Sequence of the Descriptions) (Fikret, 1910, pp. 310-325)
Ali hsan Kolcu compares poems such as Baudelaire's
"Moesta et Errabunda," three 'Spleen' poems, 'Paris Spleen' to
Fikret's 'Terennm' (Singing), 'Bir mr-i Muhayyel'
(Imaginary of A lifetime), 'Bir an- Huzur' (A Moment of
Peace), 'Ne Isterim' (What Would I like) and 'Sis' (Fog) (Kolcu,
2002, pp. 121-167), and he touches upon similarities in their
themes such as spleen, escape pessimism.
The capitals-Paris, London and Istanbul- of their ages
Baudelaire, Eliot and Fikret lived are like each other in their
poems. Paris is a city described by "Hospital, brothels,

purgatory, hell, prison" 1 (Baudelaire, 1917, p. 179) in

'pilogue' of Paris Spleen of Baudelaire. In a similar way, in
Fikret's Sis (Fog) Istanbul is also described by its "killer
towers, palaces with castles and dungeons"2 (Fikret, 1910, p.
291)
London appears with the image of an Unreal City, a
crowd of people who flows over London Bridge echoing
Baudelaires 'Paris le fourmillante tableau' in Eliot's The
Waste Land. The city is "under the brown fog of a winter
dawn" (Eliot, 1930, p. 14), the fog is covered over the
proceedings of the City as if "a stubborn smoke wrapped
around her horizons" 3 (Fikret, 1910, p. 289).
Istanbul is cursed by Fikret in the poem Sis (The Fog). This
is an imaginative curse due to strict rules of the Sultan
Abdul-Hamit of Monarchy of 19th century. Here Istanbul is an
image/symbol, in the fact the curse is not to the city, to
Monarchical period of the Sultan. Istanbul, for the first time
in Turkish literature in Sis /Fog is considered as a heinous and
an accursed city (Kaplan, 1998, p. 110)
In Fikret's poem, Istanbul is likened to prostitutes, while
Baudelaire both loves and hates Paris with all beauty, ugliness
and prostitutes: "I love you, infamous capital, bitches" 4
(Baudelaire, 1917, p. 180) Baudelaire accepts this infamous
city steeped in sin, reminded him of purgatory and a hell, with
its whorehouse, prisons with all bad sides. Nevertheless,
Fikret is in a strong hatred to Istanbul. "It is the fusty
Byzantine, an old, a charming fool, a widowed girl, residue of
a thousand husbands."5 (Fikret, 1910, p. 290)
In Paris, London, Istanbul there are spleen, death, killers,
bandits, gates of hell. The poets want to escape from the cities
they live in, but they do not go anywhere, they cannot go away.
Paris and London are charming despite of everything, but
Istanbul does not fascinate Fikret. Is is full of hypocrisy, dirt,
loathsome, envy." The poet humiliates and curses Istanbul
during the poem by the words "Cover/Drap (city), and eternal
sleep, O world's old bitch!"
London of Eliot is a dead city. People are impotent; they are
in conflict between life and death. The poet describes the city
by the lines "Sighs, short and infrequent, were exhaled, and
each man fixed his eyes before his feet. Flowed up the hill and
down King William Street, To where Saint Mary Woolnoth
kept the hours With a dead sound on the final stroke of nine"
(Eliot, 1930, p. 15)
Paris is a 'gate of Hell', London is a 'waste land', and
Istanbul is an old bitch. They are wastelands, the cities of
spleen; shortly their people are 'hollow men' by words of Eliot
in one sense. Of course, there are many things about these
three poets and their poetries. Here I wanted to explain main
aspects so that they are a practice for comparative literature.

1 Hpital, lupanars, purgatoire, enfer, bagne

2 Katil kuleler, kal'eli, zindnl saraylar
3 Sarm yine fakn bir dd- muannid
4 Je t'aime, o capitale infme! Courtisanes
5 Ey khne Bizans, ey koca fertt- musahhir, Ey bin kocadan artakalan bve-i
bkir;

International Journal of Literature and Arts 2016; 4(1-1): 5-12

4. Conclusion
From Plato and Aristotle's ages to present people have been
interested in the others' literature, languages, cultures or
customs, they have made some comparisons between
themselves and the others.
In academic respect since 19th century comparative
literature has been developed and theorized, the science of
comparative literature has been transformed in one side into
the theories of comparative literature and literary criticism,
comparative literature as an umbrella term has focused on
world literature in some curiosity of knowledge the self and
the other.
While Wellek and Warren govern the principles and
practices of comparative literature, Totosy de Zepetnek offers
a method in at least two ways for the discipline of
Comparative Literature. First comparative literature means the
knowledge of more than one national language and literature,
and/or it means the knowledge and application of other
discipline in and for the study of literature and second,
Comparative Literature has an ideology of the inclusion of the
Other, be that a marginal literature in its several meanings of
marginality, a genre, various text types, etc. (Ttsy de
Zepetnek, 1998, p. 13)
We can ask some questions such as what does "comparative
literature" mean? or which cultures, languages or whose
literatures is it concerned? Does it have any relationship the
concept of "world literature"? or What sorts of relations does a
national literature have to the international ones? What about
comparative approaches to world literature?
Where will these kinds of questions bring us? Is a passage
to comparative literature in all countries? Who is interested in
it? or what contribution/s does comparative literature provide
to us.
On Wednesday, on 31 January 1827, over dinner, Goethe
talks to Eckermann "about especially a Chinese novel that he
has read many and various things; which occupies him still,
and seems to him very remarkable." As a reaction," that
(Chinese novel) must be very strange enough," says
Eckermann. However Goethe's respond Not so much as you
might think will be, and Goethe's comparative approach will
go on Chinese, German and English novelists:
The Chinamen think, act, and feel almost exactly like us;
and we soon find that we are perfectly like them, excepting
that all they do is more clear, more pure, and decorous than
with us. With them all is orderly, citizen-like, without great
passion or poetic flight; there is a strong resemblance to my
Hermann and Dorothea, as well as to the English novels of
Richardson. They likewise differ from us, inasmuch as with
them external nature is always associated with the human
figures. You always hear the goldfish splashing in the pond,
the birds are always singing on the bough, the day is always
serene and sunny, the night is always clear." (Goethe, 1850, p.
349)
Comparative literature is a unique tool for readers or
academics or researchers who feel curious, enjoy reading and
analyzing literary works about other languages and cultures of

11

the other nations, or interested in global studies and

international relations.
As we said before, the most important aspect of comparison
a literary text must be the products of different nations,
cultures or languages. A comparatist can study literatures from
all parts of the globe, there is no boundary, he or she can go
beyond one nation's literature, she / he compare it to two or
more, for instance someone who studies Turkish language and
literature can understand foreign language, culture or literary
works in their original languages such as English, French,
German, Spanish and Chinese.
Comparative literature will help us explore all literary
values of the other literatures as well as ours. Whereas it is
necessary not to forget that the works of the same nation will
not be a study of comparative literature , it is a literary study, a
comparative approach to literary history of a national
literature, not comparative literature. It means progress of a
country's own literature, a literary research. However
comparative literature is a study behind the boundaries,
between different languages, cultures and literatures .
To sum up, what benefits comparative literature provides us
are obvious as we discuss above. Comparative literature is
necessary for the world literature. We can examine importance
of Voltaire for French, Spencer for English, Dante for Italian,
Tolstoy for Russian, Al-Farabi for Turkish; and all of them
importance for the world literature in the light of comparative
literature in the best way.

References
[1]

Arnold, M. (1895). In G. W. Russell, Letters of Matthew Arnold

1848-1888 1 (2 vols). London, London: Macmillan and Co.

[2]

Arnold, M. (1914). On the Modern Elements in Literature. In

Essay by Matthew Arnold Incluiding Essays in Criticism, 1865
On Translating Homer and Five Other Essays (pp. 453-472).
London: Humphrey Milford, Oxford University Press.

[3]

Baldensperger, F. (1921). Littrature Compare: Le Mot et la

chose. In F. Baldensperger, & P. Hazard, Revue de Littrature
Compare 1 (pp. 5-29). Paris: Librairie Ancienne Honor
Champion Edouard Champion.

[4]

Baudelaire, C. (1857). Les

Poulet-Malassis et de Broise.

[5]

Baudelaire, C. (1917). Petits Poemes en Prose (Le Spleen de

Paris). Paris : Louis Conard.

[6]

Eliot, T. (1930). The Waste Land. New York: Horace Liveright.

[7]

Fikret, T. (1910). Rbab- ikeste. stanbul: Tanin Matbaas.

[8]

Goethe, J. W. (1850). Conversations of Goethe with Eckermann

and Soret. Trans From German by John Oxenford in Two
Volumes (Vol.1). London: Smith, Elder and Co.,

[9]

Johnson, D. (1842). Dr. Johnson's Preface. In W. Harness, The

Complete Works of William Shakespeare with Dr. Johnson's
Preface (pp. 3-10). London: Scott, Webster, and Geary.

Fleurs

du

Mal.

Paris:

[10] Kaplan, M. (1998). iir Tahlilleri I. stanbul: Dergah Yaynlar.

12

Elmas Sahin:

On Comparative Literature

[11] Kolcu, A. . (2002). Albatros'un Glgesi. Ankara: Aka.

[12] Meres, F. (1598). A Comparative Discourse of our English
Poets, with the Greek, Latin, and Italian Poets,
http://www.elizabethanauthors.org/palladis.htm
[13] Shakespeare, W. (1773). The Plays of William Shakespeare.
London: C. Bathurst.
[14] Spivak, G. C. (2003). Death of a Discipline. New York:
Colombia University Press .
[15] Ttsy de Zepetnek, S. (1998). Comparative, Literature,
Theory, Method, Application. Amsterdam-Atlanta: Rodopi.
[16] Ttsy de Zepetnek, S. (1999). From Comparative Literature
Today toward Comparative Cultural Studies. CLCWeb:

Comparative Literature and Culture, Vol. 1, Issue 3,

http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1041&c
ontext=clcweb.
[17] Turquet-Milnes, G. (1913). The Influence of Baudelaire in
France and England. London: Constamble and Company Ltd.
[18] Valry, P. (1924). Situation de Baudelaire. Paris: Chez Madame
Lesage (it was also published in Varit II , Paris, NRF, 1930, p.
134-135).
[19] Wellek, R. (1970). Discriminations: Further Concepts of
Criticism. Delhi: Vikas Publishers.
[20] Wellek, R., & Warren, A. (1949). Theory of Literature. New
York: Harcourt.