14 AJBLS Jan-Apr-2013 106
14 AJBLS Jan-Apr-2013 106
14 AJBLS Jan-Apr-2013 106
Original Article
Submitted : 17.01.2013
Accepted : 06.02.2013
Published : 30.04.2013
Abstract
A cross-sectional study of 749 rural adolescent girls of age 10-18 years of Salboni block Paschim Medinipur, West Bengal, India was undertaken to
evaluate nutritional status. Anthropometric measurements including weight and height were taken following standard techniques. Body mass index
(BMI) was calculated using international BMI cut-off point for children and adolescence from 2 to 18 years of age. Results revealed that girls of 10
years had highest (65.1 %) prevalence of undernutrition. The overall prevalence of undernutrition was (48.3 %). A significant age difference existed for
weight (F= 41.023, p< 0.001), height (F= 32.907, p< 0.001) and BMI (F= 17.979, p< 0.001). Age difference was also evident (2= 75.214; df= 32; p
<0.001) in nutritional status. It was concluded that the studied rural girls of Salboni block were suffering from very high (critical situation) rate of
undernutrition. Urgent nutritional intervention programme should be given to them.
INTRODUCTION
N
749
ANOVA (N)
*p< 0.0001
Table 2: Nutritional status (%) of the subjects based on BMI cut-off points
havd the lowest (15.21 kg/m2) compared to all other age groups.
There were significant age differences in weight (F= 41.023, p<
0.001), height (F= 32.907, p< 0.001) & BMI (F= 17.979, p<
0.001). Although the 18 years girls had little lower
anthropometric values than age 17, Scheffe's post-hoc test
revealed this difference was not statistically significant. The
overall (age-combined) prevalence of thinness and overweight
were 48.3 % and 1.6 %, respectively. The highest prevalence of
thinness was observed at age 10 years. Grade-III thinness was
highest at age 11 years; grade-II and grade-I thinness were the
69
DISCUSSION
Figure 1 (a): Comparison of International (NCHS, 1977) & National (ICMR, 2009) weight with present study
Figure 1 (b): Comparison of International (Hamill, 1979; CDC, 2002; WHO, 2006) & National (ICMR, 2009) height with
present study
70
Figure 2: Comparative prevalence of thinness among studied population with present study.
REFERENCES
CONCLUSION
4.
El Ghannam AR. The global problems of child malnutrition
and mortality in different world regions. J. Health Soc. Policy,
2003; 16(4):1-26.
1.
WHO/UNFPA/UNICEF. The Reproductive Health of
Adolescent Strategy for Action. Geneva. 1989.
2.
World Health Organisation. Strategies for adolescent
health and development: South East Asia Region, Report of an
inter-country consultation, WHO: Regional Office of South East
Asia, New Delhi, December 1998; pp.1-4.
3.
Nube, M., AsensoOkyere, W.K., van den Bloom, G.J.M.,
1998. Body mass index as an indicator of standard of living in
developing countries. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr, 77, 11861191.
5.
Cole TJ, Flegal KM, Nicholls D, Jackson AA. Body mass
index cut offs to define thinness in children and adolescents:
international survey. BMJ, 2007; 335: 194.
6.
Kalhan M, Vashisht B, Kumar V, Sharma S. Nutritional
status of adolescent girls of rural Haryana. Internet J. Epidemiol,
2010; 8 (1).
7.
Das S, Mahata M, Bose K. Age-trend in thinness among
Birhor children and adolescents of purulia: a primitive tribe of
West Bengal, India. Asian Journal of Biological and life Sciences,
2012; 1 (1): 58-60.
8.
Hamill PV, Drizd TA, Johnson CL, Reed RB, Roche AF,
71
72