Chnevert 2013
Chnevert 2013
Chnevert 2013
The role of organisational justice, burnout and commitment in the understanding of absenteeism in
the Canadian healthcare sector
Denis Chnevert Genevieve Jourdain Nina Cole Brigitte Banville
Article information:
Access to this document was granted through an Emerald subscription provided by 199044 []
For Authors
If you would like to write for this, or any other Emerald publication, then please use our Emerald for Authors service
information about how to choose which publication to write for and submission guidelines are available for all. Please
visit www.emeraldinsight.com/authors for more information.
The current issue and full text archive of this journal is available at
www.emeraldinsight.com/1477-7266.htm
JHOM
27,3
350
Nina Cole
Ryerson University HRM, Toronto, Canada, and
Brigitte Banville
Aimia inc HRM, Montreal, Canada
Abstract
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to integrate Greenbergs perspective on the connection
between injustice and stress in order to clarify the role of organisational justice, burnout and
organisational commitment in the understanding of absenteeism.
Design/methodology/approach The study was carried out among 457 workers of a large
healthcare establishment in the Canadian public healthcare sector. The model was tested using
structural equation methods.
Findings The results reveal that procedural and interactional justices have an indirect effect on
exhaustion through distributive injustice. Moreover, it was found that distributive injustice is
indirectly linked to short-term absences through exhaustion. By contrast, the relationship between
distributive injustice and long-term absence can be explained by two mediating variables, namely,
exhaustion and psychosomatic complaints.
Research limitations/implications In spite of the non-longitudinal nature of this study, the
results suggest that the stress model and the medical model best explain the relationship between
organisational injustice and absenteeism, while the withdrawal model via organisational commitment
is not associated in this study with absenteeism.
Practical implications Healthcare managers should consider the possibility of better involving
employees in the decision-making process in order to increase their perception of procedural and
interactional justice, and indirectly reduce exhaustion and absenteeism through a greater perception of
distributive justice.
Social implications For the healthcare sector, the need to reduce absenteeism is particularly
urgent because of budget restrictions and the shortage of labour around the world.
Originality/value This is one of the first studies to provide a complete model that analyses the
stress process in terms of how organisational justice affects short- and long-term absences, in a bid to
understand the specific process and factors that lead to shorter and longer episodes of absence.
Introduction
In recent years, several reforms to the health and social services system in Canada and
around the world have considerably altered the organisation of services and the work
Absenteeism in
the healthcare
sector
351
JHOM
27,3
352
Absenteeism in
the healthcare
sector
353
Figure 1.
The role of organisational
justice, burnout and
commitment in the
understanding of
absenteeism
JHOM
27,3
354
Absenteeism in
the healthcare
sector
355
JHOM
27,3
356
Absenteeism in
the healthcare
sector
357
SD
Table I.
Descriptive statistics,
correlations and
reliability coefficients
0.11
0.01
2 0.07 2 0.04
2 0.01
0.73
0.05
0.20
0.14
0.45
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
2 0.03
0.05
0.31
0.18
0.05
0.05 2 0.03
0.08
0.07
0.00
0.03
0.15
0.04
0.24
0.16 2 0.03 2 0.01
0.49
0.02
0.17
2 0.03
0.01
0.04
0.02
0.03 2 0.07 2 0.02 2 0.01
0.70
2 0.07 2 0.02
0.03
0.06 2 0.01 2 0.03 2 0.04 2 0.13
0.25
0.93
0.04
0.08
0.02
0.02
0.01
0.09
0.05
0.02 2 0.16 2 0.14 0.86
0.17 20.02
0.16 20.07
0.86
0.07
0.02
0.06
0.15
0.08
0.04
0.08 2 0.05
0.04
0.09
2 0.01
0.04 2 0.10
0.05 20.16
2 0.03
0.08
0.01
0.03 20.01
2 0.08
0.14
0.13
0.08 20.05
0.26 20.10 2 0.13 2 0.12
0.29
0.80 20.05 2 0.25 2 0.09
0.30
2 0.14
0.11
0.52
0.25 20.06
0.04
0.19
0.05
2 0.07
2 0.08
2 0.06
2 0.20
0.28
0.30
2 0.16
0.55
0.89
2 0.12 2 0.08
0.40
0.13
2 0.20 2 0.13
0.71
0.19
0.85
0.34
0.95
2 0.19
0.08
2 0.30 2 0.26
358
1. Procedural justice
3.44
1.26
2. Interactional justice
5.09
1.65
3. Distributive injustice
4.08
1.69
4. Exhaustion
4.06
1.50
5. Psychosomatic
complaints
2.73
1.42
6. Organizational
commitment
4.50
1.41
7. Previous short-term
absences
14.24 24.67
8. Prospective short-term
absences
16.09 23.66
9. Previous long-term
absences
47.60 177.2
10. Prospective long-term
absences
33.65 164.1
11. Age
42.86 44.00
12. Gender
1.81
0.40
13. Work schedule (day)
0.68
0.47
14. Organizational tenure 140.6 131
15. Autonomy
5.47
1.26
16. Supervisor support
4.93
1.69
17. Workload
5.03
1.45
JHOM
27,3
Absenteeism in
the healthcare
sector
Structural model
The quality of fit of the structural model to the data appears to be satisfactory overall
(x 2 758 1; 289:41, p , :001; RMSEA 0:039; NFI 0:89; CFI 0:95), and the
variance explained for each of the endogenous variables is respectively 57 per cent for
distributive injustice, 41 per cent for exhaustion, 27 per cent for affective organisational
commitment, 44 per cent for psychosomatic complaints, 21 per cent for short-term
absences, and 11 per cent for long-term absences.
Figure 2 shows a significant negative relationship between procedural justice and
distributive injustice (g 20:57; p , 0:001), and between interactional justice and
distributive injustice (g 20:33; p , 0:001), which confirms our first and second
hypotheses.
The results in Figure 2 also confirm H3a: the more employees perceive distributive
injustice, the more they feel exhausted (g 0:30; p , 0:01). H3b states that
distributive injustice acts as an intervening variable in the negative effect of procedural
justice on exhaustion. Following Preacher and Hayess (2008) recommendations, we
estimated the significance of the indirect effect of procedural justice on exhaustion via
distributive injustice using a bootstrap approach. We bootstrapped 5,000 samples to
obtain the 95 per cent bias-corrected confidence interval (CI) (MacKinnon et al., 2004)
for the indirect effect. If the CI does not include zero, the indirect effect is deemed to
be significantly different from zero. We found this negative indirect effect
(estimate 20:09, 95 per cent CI 20:01; 2 0:19) to be significant. These results
confirm H3b. We obtained similar results with the indirect effect of interactional justice
on exhaustion via distributive injustice (estimate 20:08, 95 per cent
CI 20:04; 2 0:14), which confirms H3c.
H4a and H4b pertain to the relationship between exhaustion and psychosomatic
complaints on the one hand, and to the indirect effect between distributive injustice and
psychosomatic complaints via exhaustion, on the other. Overall, H4 is confirmed.
Figure 2 shows a positive relationship between exhaustion and psychosomatic
complaints (g 0:66; p , 0:01) and, as mentioned, between distributive injustice and
exhaustion (g 0:30; p , 0:01). In fact, a positive indirect effect on psychosomatic
complaints was observed via exhaustion (estimate 0:18, 95 per cent CI 0:12; 0:26).
This result suggests that the direct positive relationship that we observed between
distributive injustice and psychosomatic complaints is mediated by exhaustion (see
Mathieu and Taylor, 2006).
The results we obtained confirm H5, but not H6. We found a significant link
between procedural justice and organisational commitment (g 0:33; p , 0:01), but
no significant link between interactional justice and organisational commitment
(g 20:11; NS). H7 posits that exhaustion is negatively linked to organisational
commitment, but our results do not support this hypothesis (b 20:08; NS).
H8a and H8b pertain to the relationship between exhaustion and short-term
absence duration on the one hand, and the indirect effect of distributive injustice on
359
JHOM
27,3
360
Figure 2.
Structural models
Discussion
Consistent with Greenbergs (2004) theoretical perspective, we found that procedural
and interactional justice are indirectly related to exhaustion through distributive
injustice. When the perception of procedural justice is not positive, employees will most
likely turn to those who can best shed a light on the procedures, such as their
immediate supervisor. The supervisors response will be important because it will
influence the employees perception of injustice concerning a specific outcome.
Theoretical implications
Our results also demonstrate that perceived organisational injustice is not directly
linked to absenteeism, but rather is linked indirectly through exhaustion and
psychosomatic complaints. We proposed that the stress model best explains the
relationship between exhaustion and absenteeism, while the medical model best
explains the relationship between psychosomatic complaints engendered by a high
level of exhaustion and absenteeism. Our results confirm both of these models. These
findings may be explained by the work adaptation strategy (coping strategy).
According to Lazarus and Launiers (1978) theoretical perspective, individuals analyse
a situation in terms of its impact on their well-being. When individuals consider that
they are not able to adapt to the situation or to change it, the event will be appraised as
stressful, and will engender psychological tension manifested in the form of anxiety,
and eventually, exhaustion (Tepper, 2001). Employees who experience such malaise
may be tempted to use an active and direct adaptation strategy which involves
occasionally taking days off to relieve the stress (Lazarus and Launier, 1978). Hackett
and Bycio (1996) assert that despite this adaptation strategy, some employees may not
necessarily improve the state of their mental health, although they may avert
aggravating it. High exhaustion for a long period of time will generate psychosomatic
complaints and eventually lead to long-term leaves of absence.
Contrary to the withdrawal model, the links between the employees perception of
organisational justice or injustice, engagement or disengagement and absenteeism are
not significant in our study. More particularly, interactional justice is not linked to
affective organisational commitment when the perception of organisational support
(POS) is controlled. The study by Rhoades et al. (2001) suggests that organisational
justices (procedural and interactional) are indirectly linked to affective commitment via
POS. Therefore, it is possible that interactional justice in our study has an indirect effect
on organisational commitment via POS or procedural justice. The supervision structure
in the Canadian healthcare sector can also explain the limited role of interactional justice
in the withdrawal process. For example, the caregivers supervisor frequently manages
more than 100 professionals, which considerably reduces the possibility of social
interactions. We also believe that the population examined may explain this result. The
interdependence between the tasks of caregivers (60 per cent of our sample) and their
commitment to abide by a code of ethics are factors that contribute to increasing the level
of commitment of workers in the healthcare sector, who may hesitate to take short-term
leaves of absence in order to avoid increasing the workload of their co-workers and
Absenteeism in
the healthcare
sector
361
JHOM
27,3
362
reducing the quality of care offered to patients. Although their level of commitment
toward the organisation may be low, their level of commitment toward the team and the
patients will most likely motivate them to attend work. However, these factors are not
likely to have a great impact when employees are experiencing feelings of exhaustion
and lack the capacity to attend work. Even though commitment toward the team and the
patients may be high and employees may want to attend work despite their state of
exhaustion, they are no more and no less capable of doing so. This would explain why we
found, in our study, that exhaustion leads directly and indirectly to absenteeism, while
low affective organisational commitment does not.
Finally, we argued that by addressing employees psychological needs and
interests, procedural and interactional justice should foster affective commitment
toward the organisation. Nevertheless, only the relationship with procedural justice
was found to be significant. One possible explanation for this finding might be the fact
that procedural justice is a job resource more strongly related to the organisational
facet of the work environment, while interactional justice is a job resource more
strongly associated with its social interactions facet more precisely, in this study,
with the immediate supervisor.
Managerial implications
For managers in the healthcare sector, the need to reduce absenteeism is particularly
urgent because of budget restrictions and the shortage of labour in healthcare
establishments around the world. The low level of perception of procedural and
distributive justice in this sample (average 3.4 and 3.5 out of 7) confirms the importance
of carrying out immediate actions to enhance these aspects of fair treatment. For
example, more specific performance appraisal and salary increase criteria could reduce
the pressure on managers to explain and justify their decisions. A consultation process
and a multidisciplinary decision team should also be implemented in order to increase
the perception of procedural justice and indirectly reduce exhaustion and absenteeism
through a better perception of distributive justice. In the Canadian healthcare sector,
employees are normally excluded from the decision making process. In fact, most
reorganisation decisions come from the Canadian government, and are imposed on
hospitals. The boards of directors of many hospitals perpetuate the same directive
decision process by implementing changes without employee feedback. This absence
of consideration for employees generates suspicion, perceptions of unfairness, stress
and eventually, sickness and absenteeism. Employers must also be attuned to the
relational abilities of their managers. If managers are able to show employees
consideration and clearly and honestly explain why they took a given decision, they
will reduce the negative perception of distributive injustice. A major training effort can
be made to increase the quality of interpersonal relations between supervisors and
their employees. Moreover, as this study has demonstrated, perceptions of
organisational injustice are not directly linked to absenteeism, but rather, are linked
indirectly through exhaustion and psychosomatic complaints. Because commitment to
the organisation does not fluctuate easily in response to exhaustion, as shown in this
study, it is not likely to be a factor that could prompt exhausted healthcare workers to
take occasional short-term sick leaves in order to restore or at least maintain their state
of health (Hackett and Bycio, 1996). As a consequence, workers may aggravate their
health by prolonging exposure to chronic stress, up to a point where they will need to
stay at home and rest. However, Hackett and Bycios (1996) study reveals that
sickness-related short-term absence is more likely to slow down the rate of aggravation
of burnout symptoms, thereby serving more of a health maintenance function than a
restorative one. Then, after realizing that taking short-term sick leaves occasionally is
not an effective health restoring strategy and experiencing physical symptoms of ill
health, workers may feel a stronger need to seek medical advice and be given a
doctors order to take a long-term sick leave. Managers must therefore listen to their
employees to identify signs of professional burnout and work jointly with the RH staff
to formulate an action plan. All in all, absenteeism is an important individual,
organisational and societal issue, and managers in the healthcare sector should take
actions to implement a presenteeism prevention policy in their organisation.
Limitations and future research
This study has some limitations that should be noted. First, it was carried out in a
single organisation, which limits the possibility of using organisational differences as
determinants. The culture of absence and social pressures within the group are often
better determinants than individual attitudes (Gellatly, 1995). The measurement of
absenteeism based uniquely on the duration not the frequency of absences can
also constitute a limitation. Although we considered short- and long-term absences, we
could not differentiate between several one-day absences and absences of a few days
within the short-term absences category. Nevertheless, the meta-analysis of Darr and
Johns (2008) suggests no significant difference across frequency and time lost
absenteeism measures. Moreover, the measures of exhaustion and psychosomatic
complaints were collected at the same time, and we know that exhaustion precedes
psychosomatic complaints. Consequently, it is preferable, in a future research
endeavour, to measure these concepts at two different times, in order to take the
development process into account. The same remark could be considered with
organisational justice dimensions (distributive, procedural and interactional). To
perfectly test the justice salience hierarchy model of Greenberg (2004), a longitudinal
research design with three time measurements is necessary. On the basis of the results
of the present study, one important research avenue would be to test the same research
model with different categories of workers, departments and organisations in the
healthcare sector, who present different contexts, depending on their mission and
clientele, to see if there is support for the withdrawal model, which maintains that low
affective organisational commitment will encourage absenteeism.
In conclusion, absenteeism is an important individual, organisational and social
issue. The associated human and organisational costs of absenteeism are disturbing,
particularly in a sector facing budget restrictions and a shortage of qualified labour. Our
results, consistent with those of Bourbonnais and Mondor (2001), suggest that the causes
of absenteeism are complex, and differ depending on the nature of the absenteeism. As
this study has demonstrated, perceptions of organisational injustice are not directly
linked to absenteeism, but rather are linked indirectly through exhaustion and
psychosomatic complaints. As predicted by the stress and medical models (Johns, 1997),
our results support the instrumental role played by stress and exhaustion in explaining
short-term and long-term absenteeism phenomena. However, contrary to the
withdrawal model ( Johns, 2001), affective organisational commitment did not play a
significant role in the understanding of short-term absence duration in this study.
Absenteeism in
the healthcare
sector
363
JHOM
27,3
References
Adams, A., Lugsden, E., Chase, J., Arber, S. and Bond, S. (2000), Skill-mix changes and work
intensification in nursing, Work Employment and Society, Vol. 14, pp. 541-555.
Adams, J.S. (1965), Inequity in social exchange, in Berkowitz, L. (Ed.), Advances in
Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 2, Academic Press, New York, NY, pp. 267-299.
364
Allen, N.J. and Meyer, J.P. (1990), The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance
and normative commitment to the organization, Journal of Occupational Psychology,
Vol. 63, pp. 1-17.
Anderson, J.C. and Gerbing, D.W. (1988), Structural equation modeling in practice: a review and
recommended two-step approach, Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 103, pp. 411-423.
Bakker, A.B. and Demerouti, E. (2003), Job demands and job resources as predictors of absence
duration and frequency, Journal of Vocational Behavior, Vol. 62, pp. 341-356.
Beck, A. (1978), Depression Inventory, Center for Cognitive Therapy, Philadelphia, PA.
Bentler, P.M. (1992), On the fit of models to covariances and methodology to the Bulletin,
Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 112, pp. 400-404.
Bourbonnais, R. and Mondor, M. (2001), Job strain and sickness absence among nurses in the
province of Quebec, American Journal of Industrial Medicine, Vol. 39 No. 2, pp. 194-202.
Buunk, B.P., de Jonge, J., Ybema, J.F. and de Wolff, C.J. (1998), Psychosocial aspects of
occupational stress, in Drenth, P.J.D., Thierry, H. and de Wolff, C.J. (Eds), Handbook of
Work and Organizational Psychology, 2nd ed., Vol. 2, Psychology Press, Hove, pp. 145-182.
Byrne, B.M. (1998), Structural Equation Modeling with LISREL, PRELIS, and SIMPLIS: Basic
Concepts, Applications, and Programming, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.
Chenevert, D., Charest, A. and Simard, G. (2007), Etude de levolution des determinants de
lengagement affectif: le role de lhabilitation, du plafonnement de carrie`re et de la justice
organisationnelle, Relations Industrielles/Industrial Relations, Vol. 62 No. 2, pp. 258-281.
Cooper, C.L., Dewe, P.J. and ODriscoll, M.P. (2001), A special form of strain. Job related
burnout, in Cooper, C.L., Dewe, P.J. and ODriscoll, M.P. (Eds), Organizational Stress: A
Review and Critique of Theory, Research, and Applications, Sage Publications, Thousand
Oaks, CA.
Colquitt, J. (2001), On the dimensionality of organizational justice: a construct validation
measure, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 86 No. 3, pp. 386-400.
Cropanzano, R., Rupp, D.E. and Byrne, Z.S. (2003), The relationship of emotional exhaustion to
work attitudes, job performance, and organizational citizenship behaviors, Journal of
Applied Psychology, Vol. 88, pp. 160-169.
Darr, W. and Johns, G. (2008), Work strain, health, and absenteeism: a meta-analysis, Journal of
Occupational Health Psychology, Vol. 13 No. 4, pp. 293-318.
De Boer, E.M., Bakker, A.B., Syroit, J.E. and Schaufeli, W.B. (2002), Unfairness at work as a
predictor of absenteeism, Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol. 23, pp. 181-197.
De Jonge, J., Janssen, P.P.M. and Van Breukelen, G.J.P. (1996), Testing the
demand-control-support model among health-care professionals: a structural equation
model, Work & Stress, Vol. 10, pp. 209-224.
Dubois, C.-A. and Dussault, G. (2002), La politique de ressources humaines et la transformation
des syste`mes de soins, Gestion, Vol. 27, pp. 55-63.
Elovainio, M., Kivimaki, M. and Vahtera, J. (2002), Organizational justice: evidence of a new
psychosocial predictor of health, American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 92 No. 1,
pp. 105-108.
Gellatly, I.R. (1995), Individual and group determinants of employee absenteeism: test of a
causal model, Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol. 16 No. 5, pp. 469-485.
Greenberg, J. (2004), Stress fairness to fare no stress: managing workplace stress by promoting
organizational justice, Organizational Dynamics, Vol. 33, pp. 352-365.
Absenteeism in
the healthcare
sector
365
JHOM
27,3
366
Maslach, C. and Jackson, S.E. (1996), Maslach Burnout Inventory-Human Services Survey
(MBI-HSS), in Maslach, C., Jackson, S.E. and Leiter, M.P. (Eds), ), Maslach Burnout
Inventory Manual, 3rd ed., CPP, Inc., Mountain View, CA, pp. 3-17.
Maslach, C., Schaufeli, W.B. and Leiter, M.P. (2001), Job burnout, Annual Review of Psychology,
Vol. 52, pp. 397-422.
Mathieu, J.E. and Taylor, S.R. (2006), Clarifying conditions and decision points for meditational
type inferences in organizational behaviour, Journal of Organizational Behaviour, Vol. 27,
pp. 1031-1056.
Meyer, J.P. and Allen, N.J. (1991), A three-component conceptualization of organizational
commitment, Human Resource Management Review, Vol. 1, pp. 61-89.
Meyer, J.P. and Smith, C. (2000), HRM practices and organizational commitment: test of a
mediation model, Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, Vol. 17 No. 4, pp. 319-331.
Meyer, J.P., Allen, N.J. and Smith, C.A. (1993), Commitment to organizations and occupations:
extension and test of a three-component conceptualization, Journal of Applied Psychology,
Vol. 78, pp. 538-551.
Moliner, C., Martinez-Tur, V., Ramos, J. and Cropanzano, R. (2005), Relationships between
organizational justice and burnout at the work-unit level, International Journal of Stress
Management, Vol. 12, pp. 99-116.
Moliner, C., Martinez-Tur, V., Ramos, J. and Cropanzano, R. (2008), Organizational justice and
extrarole customer service: the mediating role of well-being at work, European Journal of
Work and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 17, pp. 327-348.
Moorman, R.H. (1991), Relationship between organizational justice and organizational
citizenship behaviors: do fairness perceptions influence employee citizenship?, Journal
of Applied Psychology, Vol. 76, pp. 845-855.
Niehoff, B.P. and Moorman, R.H. (1993), Justice as a mediator of the relationship between
methods of monitoring and organizational citizenship behavior, Academy of Management
Journal, Vol. 36, pp. 527-556.
Preacher, K.J. and Hayes, A.F. (2008), Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and
comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models, Behavior Research Methods,
Vol. 40, pp. 879-891.
Rhoades, L., Eisenberger, R. and Armeli, S. (2001), Affective commitment to the organization:
the contribution of perceived organizational support, Journal of Applied Psychology,
Vol. 86 No. 5, pp. 825-836.
Roussel, P., Durrieu, F. and Campoy, E. (2002), Methodes dequations structurelles: recherche et
applications en gestion (Structural Equation Methods: Research and Applications in
Management), Economica, Paris.
Schaufeli, W. and Enzmann, D. (1998), The Burnout Companion to Study and Practice: A Critical
Analysis, Taylor & Francis, London.
Schaufeli, W., Van Dierendonck, D. and Van Gorp, K. (1996), Burnout and reciprocity: towards a
dual-level social exchange model, Work & Stress, Vol. 3, pp. 225-237.
Selye, H. (1976), The Stress of Life, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.
Sobel, M.E. (1982), Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation
models, in Leinhard, S. (Ed.), Sociological Methodology, American Sociological
Association, Washington, DC, pp. 290-312.
Shamian, J., Kerr, M.S., Spence-Laschinger, H.K. and Thomson, D.A. (2002), Hospital-level
analysis of the work environment and workforce health indicators for registered nurses in
Absenteeism in
the healthcare
sector
367
1. Genevive Jourdain, Denis Chnevert. 2014. The Moderating Influence of Perceived Organizational Values
on the Burnout-Absenteeism Relationship. Journal of Business and Psychology . [CrossRef]