IJETR032766
IJETR032766
IJETR032766
346 www.erpublication.org
A Hybrid Method for Contrast Enhancement with Edge Preservation of Generalized Images
object recognition. It plays an important role in image where is the transformation matrix, is the input image
understanding and image analyses, thus it is very important to and is the intensity value of output image. Modified gamma
preserve edges of image during contrast enhancement. Many correction is formulated as follows:
methods are developed to preserve the edges of image which / (2)
are based on local linear kernel surface estimation [6]. Other Where = 1-cdf ( ), denotes gamma value and is the
methods are based on mean shift by nonlinear filtering [7]. maximum intensity of the input. After this, hybridization of
The edge-preserving lter is used to generate a good mask input image, histogram equalized image and modified gamma
which smooths the image area with clear and fine details. corrected image is carried out which results in contrast
Enhanced sharpness of edges is also one of the feature enhancement with edge preservation of input image. The
required in image enhancement tasks [8]. The halftoning hybridization technique is based on summation of original
method which is based on modified nasik pattem techniques image, weighting coefficient k multiplied by histogram
reduces visible quantization errors and maintains image equalised image, weighting coefficient multiplied by
texture simultaneously. Not only the edges in luminance modified gamma corrected image and then whole is divided
domain but the boundaries in chrominance domain are also by summation of 1, k and . Edge detection filtration method
preserved [9]. Edge preserving image enhancement by detects the preserved edges obtained in final image by
harmony search technique boosts the relative number of edges hybridization technique. Since intensity value of image
in the image. It also improves the entropic measure of the contains many discontinuities which contains meaning full
images and enhances the overall intensity level of edges as data, therefore the need of edge preservation of images are
well. The problems associated with it are increased experienced. Such discontinuities are detected by first and
complexity and computational time [10]. second order derivatives. The first order derivative in image
Edge detection is one of the most commonly used techniques processing is gradient. The gradient is defined as the vector
to detect preserved edges of images. It is a fundamental tool
which is usually used in many image processing applications i.e. The magnitude of this vector is represented as
to obtain information from images and frames and this 1/2
= mag ( =[
method is also suitable to find the discontinuities in depth, = [( 2
+( 2 1/2
] (3)
discontinuities in surface orientation, changes in material
properties, features detection, features extraction and Where and are first order derivatives. Second order
variations in scene illumination [11]. Different methods of
derivatives in image processing is usually obtained by
edge detection technique are Sobel edge detector, Robert
edge detection, Prewitt edge detection, Laplacian of Gaussian laplacian which is represented as
(LOG), Canny Edge Detector. The rest of this paper is + (4)
organized as follows: Section II provides a detail of proposed
method. Section III provides the details of performance
parameters. In Section IV, Results are computed and
performance parameters are compared with the help of charts.
Section V includes the conclusion and future scope of
proposed method.
347 www.erpublication.org
International Journal of Engineering and Technical Research (IJETR)
ISSN: 2321-0869 (O) 2454-4698 (P), Volume-3, Issue-7, July 2015
Square Error (MSE), and Peak Signal to Noise Ratio (PSNR)
are computed which justify the proposed method. Here three
test images are considered and proposed method is applied on
them one by one and then parameters mentioned above are
computed and comparison graph are plotted which will be
shown in results section. Higher the value of Discrete Entropy
(H), higher the information contents in image. It is formulated
as (5)
Lower the value of AMBE, higher the preservation of mean
brightness of images.
(6)
where N represents the total number of test images, E(X) and
E(Y) are the average intensity of Nth test images, and E(Y) the
average intensity of the corresponding output images. Lower
the value of MSE, higher is the preservation of edges of
image.
It is formulated as
2
(7)
Where is the size of image is the processed image and
is the input image. Larger the value of PSNR, better the
quality of images. It is formulated as
(8)
348 www.erpublication.org
A Hybrid Method for Contrast Enhancement with Edge Preservation of Generalized Images
349 www.erpublication.org
International Journal of Engineering and Technical Research (IJETR)
ISSN: 2321-0869 (O) 2454-4698 (P), Volume-3, Issue-7, July 2015
Table: 2 shows the experimental results for figure 3
Shubhams ENTROPY AMBE MSE PSNR
selfie (H)
Histogram 5.85 47.1 48.3 31.33
Equalised
Image
BBHE 6.5 28 146.6 26.50
Image
Final Image 6.01 7.5 6.55 40.00
350 www.erpublication.org
A Hybrid Method for Contrast Enhancement with Edge Preservation of Generalized Images
Table: 3 shows the experimental results for figure 4 Histogram Equalization method and BBHE method.
PCA Cricket ENTROPY(H) AMBE MSE PSN Proposed method gives maximum Entropy and PSNR,
Stadium R minimum MSE and AMBE which can be seen in charts shown
Histogram 5.78 69.7 0.26 54.1 above.
Equalised
Image
BBHE Image 6.22 37 77.2 29.3
V. CONCLUSION AND FUTURE SCOPE
Final Image 6.3 18 0.05 61.5
An efficient image enhancement method is proposed which is
based on hybridization of original image, histogram equalized
image and modified gamma corrected image that will not only
248.26 enhance the contrast of images but also preserve the edges of
250
images. Edge detection helps to detect preserved edges of
200 enhanced images. The problems of losses of edges due to over
ENTROPY(H)
or under enhancement, block effects, excessive contrast
150
enhancement caused by local histogram and global histogram
100 61.52 AMBE respectively are solved by hybrid approach. This novel
39.91 39.06 method improves the clarity and visibility of images which are
50 5.65 30.313.124.22
5.71
8.1 MSE
6.25 2.8 the major need in image processing, remote sensing and
0 PSNR biomedical images. This method can be applied to enhanced
Histogram Final Image the SAR images, Satellite images and medical images.
Equalised
Image
REFERENCES
Figure : 5 Comparison Chart of Proposed Method with Histogram [1] R.C. Gonzales, R.E. Woods & SL. Eddins, Digital Image Processing
Equalization and BBHE method for figure 2 with Matlab, Second Edition, Pearson Education Inc, 2010.
[2] Zimmerman JB, Pizer SM, Staab EV, Perry JR, McCartney W, Brenton
146.6 BC, An evaluation of the effectiveness of adaptive histogram
160 equalization for contrast enhancement, IEEE Trans Med Imag., pp.
140 304-312, 1988.
120 [3] Y. Kim, Contrast enhancement using brightness preserving
100 bi-histogram equalization, IEEE Trans. Consum. Electron., vol. 43,
ENTROPY(H) no. 1, pp. 18, Feb. 1997.
80 [4] S. Chen and A. Ramli, Contrast enhancement using recursive mean
48.3
60 47.1 40 AMBE
separate histogram equalization for scalable brightness preservation,
31.33 2826.5
40 MSE IEEE Trans. Consumer Electronics, Vol. 49, No. 4, pp. 1301-1309, Nov
20 5.85 6.5 6.01 7.5
6.55 2003.
PSNR [5] T. Kim and J. Paik, Adaptive contrast enhancement using
0 gain-controllable clipped histogram equalization, IEEE Trans.
Histogram Final Image Consum. Electron., vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 18031810, Nov. 2008
Equalised [6] I. Gijbels, A. Lambert, and P. Qiu, Edge-Preserving Image Denoising
and Estimation of Discontinuous Surfaces, Technical report, Dept. of
Image Math.,University Catholique de Louvain, 2005.
[7] D. Barash and D. Comaniciu, A Common Framework for Nonlinear
Figure : 6 Comparison Chart of Proposed Method with Histogram Diffusion, Adaptive Smoothing, Bilateral Filtering and Mean Shift,
IEEE Image and Vision Computing, vol. 22, pp. 73-81, 2004.
Equalization and BBHE method for figure 3 [8] Wong, Y.F. Image enhancement by edge preserving filtring IEEE
International Conf. on Image Processing, pp. 522-524.
77.2 [9] B. Lippel and M. Kurland, The effect of dither on luminance
80 69.7 quantization of pictures, IEEE Trans. Commun. Technol.. Vol.19, No.
61.5 6, pp. 879 88.
54.1
60 [10] Zaid Abdi Alkareem Y.A., Ibrahim Venkat, Mohammed Azmi Al-Betar
ENTROPY(H) and Ahamad Tajudin Khader, Edge preserving image enhancement via
37
40 29.3 Harmony Search Algorithm, IEEE 4th Conference on Data Mining
18 AMBE and Optimization (DMO) , pp. 47-52, September 2012.
[11] T.A. Mohmoud ; S.Marshal, Edge Detected Guided Morphological
20 5.78 6.22 6.3 MSE Filter For Image sharpening, Hindawi Publishing orporation
0.26 0.05
EURASIP Journal on image and video Processing volume 2008.
0 PSNR [12] Shih-Chia Huang, Fan-Chieh Cheng, and Yi-Sheng Chiu, Efficient
Histogram Final Image Contrast Enhancement Using Adaptive Gamma Correction With
Equalised Weighting Distribution, IEEE transaction on image processing, Vol.
Image 22, NO. 3, pp.1032-1041, March 2013.
351 www.erpublication.org