SJ BDJ 2009 416 PDF
SJ BDJ 2009 416 PDF
SJ BDJ 2009 416 PDF
IN BRIEF
We live in a digital world, and recent
PRACTICE
conveniences and facilities that were
once only stuff of dreams
digital photography The eyes and digital sensors share
uncanny similarities, unlike film
photography that is rigid and inflexible
Digital photography can be summarised
1 by the acronym CPD (capture, processing
I. Ahmad and display).
Although we live in a digital age, our knowledge of the processes and technology involved is often limited. As a foundation
to understanding the subsequent parts of this series, this part describes the fundamental aspects of digital photography,
which includes the sensors, processing and display.
We are currently living in the digital revo- passes continuously, without divisions an electrical current, or charge, which is
lution: digital broadcasting, digital con- or separations. eventually processed into an image. Ocular
sumer goods, digital dental radiography, In a similar vein, digital photography and digital imagery share many similari-
and photography is no exception. Without offers many benefits compared to conven- ties and are both extremely flexible. For
doubt, digital is the future. tional photography including: example, if we see something we do not
However, the natural world is analogue; Instantaneity and convenience like, we can look away (with digital pho-
everything around us is continuous: col- Flexibility for editing, copying and tography, unwanted parts of an image
our, space, time and sound are all sinu- disseminating images can be cropped). If something attracts our
ous, without discrete separations. We have Environmentally greener by attention, the eyes concentrate on that
separated nature, or digitised it, for the eliminating toxic dyes and processing specific part of the object or subject (with
purpose of convenience, utilisation and chemicals digital photography, any point of interest
manipulation. An example is time, which Long-term economy by reusing storage can be enlarged). Also, if we do not like
we have divided into days, hours, minutes media such as memory cards. what we see, the brain can change the con-
and seconds, but which in reality, similarly text of reality so that we find the apparent
to our surroundings, is not intermittent but As with any new technology, there is, unsightly representation more pleasurable
however, a learning curve to fully utilise (with digital photography, software manip-
the benefits and avoid the pitfalls. This ulation can alter an image to any desired
FUNDAMENTALS OF DIGITAL chapter describes the fundamental aspects parameter). These few examples highlight
DENTAL PHOTOGRAPHY of digital photography, which serve as an the flexibility and uncanny similarities of
essential foundation for subsequent chap- ocular and digital imagery.
1. Digital dental photography: an overview
ters. The starting point is the quintessential Conversely, chemical or film photogra-
2. Purposes and uses
item for digital photography: the sensors. phy is rigid, with little scope for manipula-
3. Principles of digital photography
tion and therefore requires that all settings
4. Choosing a camera and accessories THE SENSORS be exact if an acceptable image is to be
5. Lighting
Light sensors can be categorised into three produced. The basis of chemical photog-
6. Camera settings
basic types, ocular, digital and chemical. raphy is photosensitive coloured layers
7. Extra-oral set-ups
Surprisingly, the fundamental principles of painted onto a film emulsion which, fol-
8. Intra-oral set-ups
the three types are very similar. The ocu- lowing development, reveals the registered
9. Post-image capture processing
lar apparatus consists of the eyes, optic image on a cellulose sheet. To produce a
10. Printing, publishing and presentations
nerve and the brain, which is the ultimate correctly exposed and high quality image,
arbitrator for assessment irrespective of the every setting needs to be accurate. For
1
General Dental Practitioner, The Ridgeway Dental
method used to create an image. In the example, sharp focusing, correct orienta-
Surgery, 173 The Ridgeway, North Harrow, light sensitive retina of the eyes, coloured tion, proper framing and composition, pre-
Middlesex, HA2 7DF
Correspondence to: Irfan Ahmad
dyes are stimulated by incoming light, cise aperture opening and shutter speeds.
Email: iahmadbds@aol.com triggering neural responses to the brain, In addition, the colour temperature of the
www.IrfanAhmadTRDS.co.uk
which subsequently computes the image ambient light must match that of the film
Refereed Paper of the object being viewed. emulsion, and the developing chemicals
Accepted 15 November 2008
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2009.416
In digital photography, light sensitive need to be precisely diluted and at the
British Dental Journal 2009; 206: 517-523 diodes act as the sensors, which create correct working temperature. It is obvious
Capture
The heart of all products based on sili-
cone technology, such as computers, stor-
age media, scanners and digital cameras, is
a semiconductor. With image sensors, the Fig. 2 Interline CCD with a small fill factor
semiconductors are photosensitive units
composed of tiny light detecting units Micro-lens
called pixels. The latter are a substitute
for emulsion in conventional film cameras.
Conducting
Pixels come in many shapes and qualities,
area
varying in size from 5 m to 12 m.
Basically, the image sensor is a col-
lection of silicone photodiodes (pixels),
which register the intensity of brightness
Pixel
and darkness of an object. In effect, they
are only capable of producing a black and
white image of the object being photo-
graphed. To create a colour image requires
using appropriate filters corresponding to
the three additive primary colours red,
green and blue. Fig. 3 Interline CCD with micro-lenses, which increase the fill factor
Currently there are two types of image
sensors competing in the market, the CCD The CCDs can be further divided into full- captured onto the sensor. The pixels are
(charged coupled device) and CMOS (com- frame and interline CCDs (Figs 1-2). The arranged in a line, and once stimulated
plementary metal oxide semiconductors), former, full-frame CCDs, allow the entire by light, convey the electrical charge to
each having advantages and disadvantages. frame viewed in the viewfinder to be the end of the line where it is processed
11 12
benefits of a 1-shot system, such as the loss, but is easier to store, manipulate and Fig. 18 An image with a file size of
113.4 MB and 5,329 3,717 pixels
ability to record moving subjects, com- disseminate. The JPEG format also has a (19.8 megapixels)
pactness, lightweight and reduced cost, range of resolutions from low to high, with
outweigh the minor and perhaps imper- corresponding file sizes, respectively.
ceptible loss in image quality. If a proprietary format is chosen, the file
Before an image can be viewed a certain is in a raw state and requires processing by
amount of processing is necessary. Firstly, specific software before it can be viewed
the captured image must be processed by and stored into a generic format. On the
software in the camera as a digital file. The other hand if a generic format is chosen at
format of the file at this stage can either be the outset, no further processing is neces-
proprietary, that is specific to a particular sary to view or store the file.
camera manufacturer, or in a generic format
such as RAW (PNG), TIFF or JPEG. Secondly, Display
the size of the ensuing file depends on After in-camera processing, the image
the format in which it is saved. The file can be displayed via electronic or printed
size is a crucial determinant of the final media. Electronic media consists of moni- Fig. 19 A 100% enlargement of a section
of the image shown in Figure 17, with a file
image quality. The file size of an image can tors and projectors, and printed media of size of 2.3 MB and 639 616 pixels
be calculated according to the formula: photographic paper or printing paper. (0.4 megapixels)
Number of pixels (total bit depth The first time that an image is usually
8) = image size in bytes viewed is on the LCD monitor on the cam-
era back (Fig. 16) The size of these moni-
For example, the maximum file size that tors varies from 2 inches to 3.5 inches,
a digital camera with a 10 million pixel with a resolution ranging from million
image sensor, and a bit depth of 24 (8 bits to 1 million pixels. The monitors allow
per primary colour) is capable of creating instantaneous viewing of the image for
in an uncompressed state is 30 MB: assessing composition, framing, orienta-
[10 106 (24 8)] = 30 MB tion and exposure. However, they are of
little use for determining fine detail or
The file format, and hence its size, is pri- sharp focus due to their low resolution,
marily dependant on the intended use of usually no more than 1 megapixels.
the image. This is usually in a RAW or TIFF The second type of electronic viewing
format. If a smaller size file is required, a is with a computer monitor or an LCD Fig. 20 A 100% enlargement of a section
low-resolution file format such as JPEG can projector (beamer). The resolution of both of the image shown in Figure 18, with a
be chosen. The latter format compresses the computer monitors and projectors varies file size of 7.6 MB and 1,140 1,153 pixels
(1.3 megapixels)
original digital file at the expense of detail enormously. For the former the resolution
ranges from as little as 720 480 (0.3 meg- The final point worth mentioning about the monitor (1.3 megapixels). However, if
apixels) to 1,440 900 (1.3 megapixels). megapixels and monitors or projectors is both images are now enlarged by 100%
Even the state-of-the-art true high defini- as follows. While both have relatively low to concentrate on the lower mandibular
tion projectors are only capable of deliver- pixel counts compared to digital cameras, incisors, the pixel count of the enlarged
ing a resolution of 2 megapixels (1,920 a difference is noticeable when an image is section of Figure 17 is 639 616 (0.4
1,080), far short of what is achievable with enlarged. For example, this is particularly megapixels) Figure 19, while for Figure
even the most inexpensive digital compact relevant when photographing pathologi- 18 it is 1,140 1,153 (1.3 megapixels)
cameras. This is the reason that an image cal changes to the oral mucosa. If a small Figure 20. With this enlargement, the pixel
taken with a 3 megapixels camera will lesion, in its early stages, is detected it is count of Figure 19 is lower (0.4 megapix-
look the same as that from a camera with useful to magnify the area for detailed els) than the monitor (1.3 megapixels),
a 10 megapixel sensor. If no difference visual assessment. However, if the image and the image appears grainy and is seen
is visually discernable, why bother with deteriorates when enlarged, it is clinically to be breaking down, with loss of detail.
expensive, high megapixels cameras? The useless, giving few clues to the pathologi- However, the enlarged image in Figure 20
reason is as follows: the resultant image cal process. To illustrate this point, con- matches the pixel count of the monitor
quality is not solely dependant on the sider the two images in Figures 17 and (1.3 megapixels) and still appears sharp
number of pixels. Other more important 18, which were taken with identical light- and retains detail. Notice the scratches
factors include resolving power of the lens, ing, lens, etc. but with digital backs of on the enamel surface on the mandibular
tonal range of the entire system such as bit different pixel count image sensors. The right lateral incisor in Figure 20, which are
depth, dynamic range, file format and size, image in Figure 17 is a 30.3 MB file, with indiscernible in Figure 19. This example
camera hardware (A/D converter, cooling), a pixel count of 2,797 1,895 (5.3 meg- emphasises the need to use camera equip-
and image processing software (interpola- apixels), while the image in Figure 18 is ment with high specifications, including a
tion and colour reproduction), etc. Hence a 113.4 MB file with a pixel count of high pixel count, to retain quality when an
an elaborate camera system usually offers 5,329 3,717 (19.8 megapixels), that is, image is enlarged.
more than just higher megapixels, but also the second image has a nearly four times The final method of viewing an image is
the features cited above to produce high greater pixel count. When both images are printing, which can either be with an office
quality images. This is an important point viewed full-frame on a standard, 1.3 meg- printer or a professional printing press.
to remember before choosing a camera sys- apixel computer monitor, no difference is Both methods are ubiquitously popular,
tem (covered in Part 4), because two cam- visually perceptible. The reason is that the each having their unique benefits and
eras with identical megapixels will produce pixel count of both images (5.3 megapix- drawbacks. Printing is discussed further
drastically different quality images. els and 19.8 megapixels) exceeds that of in Part 10.