Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 355 views

    Comparison Carrier vs. McQuay

    Uploaded by

    Pradeep Sukumaran
    The document compares Carrier and McQuay chillers for a hotel project in Oman. It analyzes various technical specifications and performance metrics of the two models. Based on the analysis, McQuay chiller is recommended as it has higher efficiency ratings, lower power consumption and sound levels, smaller footprint, and lower installation and annual operating costs compared to the Carrier chiller. Both manufacturers are widely accepted in the HVAC industry.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLS, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Comparison Carrier vs. McQuay

    Uploaded by

    Pradeep Sukumaran
    355 views2 pages
    The document compares Carrier and McQuay chillers for a hotel project in Oman. It analyzes various technical specifications and performance metrics of the two models. Based on the analysis, McQuay chiller is recommended as it has higher efficiency ratings, lower power consumption and sound levels, smaller footprint, and lower installation and annual operating costs compared to the Carrier chiller. Both manufacturers are widely accepted in the HVAC industry.

    Original Description:

    www

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    XLS, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The document compares Carrier and McQuay chillers for a hotel project in Oman. It analyzes various technical specifications and performance metrics of the two models. Based on the analysis, McQuay chiller is recommended as it has higher efficiency ratings, lower power consumption and sound levels, smaller footprint, and lower installation and annual operating costs compared to the Carrier chiller. Both manufacturers are widely accepted in the HVAC industry.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLS, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as xls, pdf, or txt
    355 views2 pages

    Comparison Carrier vs. McQuay

    Uploaded by

    Pradeep Sukumaran
    The document compares Carrier and McQuay chillers for a hotel project in Oman. It analyzes various technical specifications and performance metrics of the two models. Based on the analysis, McQuay chiller is recommended as it has higher efficiency ratings, lower power consumption and sound levels, smaller footprint, and lower installation and annual operating costs compared to the Carrier chiller. Both manufacturers are widely accepted in the HVAC industry.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLS, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as xls, pdf, or txt
    of 2

    RADISSON BLU SOHAR

    Comparison: Carrier vs. McQuay


    Manufacturer Carrier McQuay Technical assessment Reason for recommendation

    Both the makes are equally competent and


    Origin France Italy -
    widly acceptable in the HVAC industry

    2 of AWS PR ST 444.2 & 1


    Model 30XA1702 Acceptable -
    of AWS XE ST 490.3
    Chiller Warranty, years 2 2 Acceptable -

    Compressor Warranty, years 5 5 Acceptable -

    Free AMC, years 1 1 Acceptable -

    Both are generally acceptable as long they


    Efficiency Version High Premium & High -
    match with our specifications
    Cu / Al has more heat transfer ratio
    Condenser Coil Al / Al (MCHX) Cu / Al Preference given to McQuay
    when compare with Al / Al.
    Preference given to McQuay.
    The supplier shall confirm the coating Bare Aluminium or Copper is not rec for
    Coating on Coil / Warranty - Heresite / 5 years
    does not de-rate the overall efficiency of severe coastel area application.
    the Chillers.
    Preference given to Carrier considering the
    Total Cooling Capacity, kW 4445.7 4392.0 -
    future expansion of the project.
    Total Cooling Capacity, TR 1264.1 1248.8 Both the Makes are acceptable -

    Chiller Power Consumption, kW 1824.3 1773.9 Preference given to McQuay Overall Power consumption is lesser.

    Energy Efficiency Ration (EER) is


    Energy Efficiency Ratio, EER 2.44 2.48 Preference given to McQuay
    higher.
    Energy Efficiency Ration (EER) is
    Europeon Seasonal Energy Efficiency Ratio 4.04 4.24 Preference given to McQuay
    higher.
    Integrated Part Load Value (IPLV) is
    Integrated Part Load Value 4.44 4.63 Preference given to McQuay
    higher.
    Annual Electricity Bill (Considering IPLV ) OMR 175,424.92 OMR 166,194.04 Preference given to McQuay Annual energy cost is lesser.

    Sound Power Level dB at 1 meter 101 104 Preference given to Carrier Sound power level is lesser.
    RADISSON BLU SOHAR

    Modules per Chiller 2 1 Preference given to McQuay Space requirement is lesser.

    Electrical Connections per Chiller 2 1 Preference given to McQuay Single point electric power connection.

    One point power connection per chiller,


    Installation Cost High Low Preference given to McQuay
    in Carrier it is two.
    Total Foot Print, m2 116.66034 86.270175 Preference given to McQuay Reduced Chiller compound area.

    Certification - - Both the Makes are acceptable Bothe of them are EUROVENT Certified

    You might also like