This referee assessor's report summarizes a match between two unnamed teams on December 30, 1899. It evaluates the performance of the referee, two assistant referees, and fourth official. For each official, it considers their control of the game, physical fitness, positioning, and teamwork. It provides example feedback and areas for improvement, but does not give number ratings or marks. The report follows the standard format for Canadian Soccer Association referee assessments.
This referee assessor's report summarizes a match between two unnamed teams on December 30, 1899. It evaluates the performance of the referee, two assistant referees, and fourth official. For each official, it considers their control of the game, physical fitness, positioning, and teamwork. It provides example feedback and areas for improvement, but does not give number ratings or marks. The report follows the standard format for Canadian Soccer Association referee assessments.
This referee assessor's report summarizes a match between two unnamed teams on December 30, 1899. It evaluates the performance of the referee, two assistant referees, and fourth official. For each official, it considers their control of the game, physical fitness, positioning, and teamwork. It provides example feedback and areas for improvement, but does not give number ratings or marks. The report follows the standard format for Canadian Soccer Association referee assessments.
This referee assessor's report summarizes a match between two unnamed teams on December 30, 1899. It evaluates the performance of the referee, two assistant referees, and fourth official. For each official, it considers their control of the game, physical fitness, positioning, and teamwork. It provides example feedback and areas for improvement, but does not give number ratings or marks. The report follows the standard format for Canadian Soccer Association referee assessments.
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1/ 22
CSA Referee Assessor's Report
Referee COMPETITION:
TEAM A: TEAM B:
City: Stadium/Field: Date (yyyy-mm-dd) Time: Final score: In favour of: Half-time score: In favour of: Referee Assessor: Degree of Referee Level Mark Difficulty Referee: Assistant Referee 1 Assistant Referee 2 Fourth Official:
* Without clear error (only if final mark is 7.9 or 7.8)
9.0-10 Excellent 8.5 - 8.9 Very Good 8.3 - 8.4 Good (expected level) 8.2 Satisfactory with small areas for improvement 8.0 - 8.1 Satisfactory with important areas for improvement 7.9 one clear important mistake, otherwise 8.3 or above 7.8 one clear important mistake, otherwise 8.0 - 8.2 7.5 - 7.7 Below expectation, significant points for improvement 7.0 - 7.4 Disappointing. Below expectation with one clear important mistake 6.0 - 6.9 Unacceptable
Level of difficulty must be integrated into the mark and
should be assessed for each match official separately Normal Normal match for the official; few challenging situations Difficult Difficult match with some difficult decisions for the official Very Difficult Very difficult match with many difficult situations for the official
Evaluation of the Referee
1. Control of the Game Performance Correct and consistent interpretation and application of the Laws of the Game Appropriate disciplinary sanctions, tactical approach and management of the game Positive points Areas for improvement
Additional comments on Control of the Game.
2. Physical fitness and positioning Performance
Stamina, speed, acceleration whenever necessary
Positioning and movement
Positive points
Areas for improvement
Additional comments on Physical fitness and Positioning.
3. Team work Performance
Cooperation with assistant referees and fourth official Positive points
Areas for improvement
Additional comments on Teamwork.
Referee Assessor's Report
Referee
Mark*
r error (only if final mark is 7.9 or 7.8)
as for improvement t areas for improvement ke, otherwise 8.3 or above ke, otherwise 8.0 - 8.2 ant points for improvement ctation with one clear important mistake
nto the mark and
cial separately ial; few challenging situations difficult decisions for the official many difficult situations for the official
Example Minutes Example Minutes
Example Minutes CSA Referee Assessor's Report
Assistant Referee 1 COMPETITION: 0
TEAM A: 0 TEAM B: 0
City: 0 0 Stadium/Field: Date: 30-Dec-1899 Time: 0:00 Final score: 0 In favour of: 0 Half-time score: 0 In favour of: 0 0 Referee Assessor: Degree of Referee Level Mark Difficulty Referee: 0 0 Assistant Referee 10 0 Assistant Referee 20 0 Fourth Official: 0 0
* Without clear error (only if final mark is 7.9 or 7.8)
9.0-10 Excellent 8.5 - 8.9 Very Good 8.3 - 8.4 Good (expected level) 8.2 Satisfactory with small areas for improvement 8.0 - 8.1 Satisfactory with important areas for improvement 7.9 one clear important mistake, otherwise 8.3 or above 7.8 one clear important mistake, otherwise 8.0 - 8.2 7.5 - 7.7 Below expectation, significant points for improvement 7.0 - 7.4 Disappointing. Below expectation with one clear important mistake 6.0 - 6.9 Unacceptable
Level of difficulty must be integrated into the mark and
should be assessed for each match official separately Normal Normal match for the official; few challenging situations Difficult Difficult match with some difficult decisions for the official Very Difficult Very difficult match with many difficult situations for the official
Team work Performance
Cooperation with referee and fourth official Positive points Areas for improvement
Additional comments on Teamwork.
Evaluation of the Assistant Referee
Accuracy of signals : Offside situations, fouls, throw-ins, goal kicks, etc. Performance Positioning and movement
Flag technique Positive points
Areas for improvement
Additional comments for Assistant Referee
Key Match Incidents (KMIs)
Time Description Date 30-Dec-1899 Signature 0 Referee Assessor's Report
Assistant Referee 1 0
0 0 0:00 0 0
Mark*
ar error (only if final mark is 7.9 or 7.8)
eas for improvement
nt areas for improvement ake, otherwise 8.3 or above ake, otherwise 8.0 - 8.2 ficant points for improvement ectation with one clear important mistake
into the mark and
fficial separately cial; few challenging situations e difficult decisions for the official many difficult situations for the official
Example Minutes Example Minutes
Correct/Incorrect 0 CSA Referee Assessor's Report
Assistant Referee 2 COMPETITION:
TEAM A: TEAM B:
City: Stadium/Field: Date: 30-Dec-1899 Time: Final score: In favour of: Half-time score: In favour of: Referee Assessor: Degree of Referee Level Mark Difficulty Referee: Assistant Referee 1 Assistant Referee 2 Fourth Official:
* Without clear error (only if final mark is 7.9 or 7.8)
9.0-10 Excellent 8.5 - 8.9 Very Good 8.3 - 8.4 Good (expected level) 8.2 Satisfactory with small areas for improvement 8.0 - 8.1 Satisfactory with important areas for improvement 7.9 one clear important mistake, otherwise 8.3 or above 7.8 one clear important mistake, otherwise 8.0 - 8.2 7.5 - 7.7 Below expectation, significant points for improvement 7.0 - 7.4 Disappointing. Below expectation with one clear important mistake 6.0 - 6.9 Unacceptable
Level of difficulty must be integrated into the mark and
should be assessed for each match official separately Normal Normal match for the official; few challenging situations Difficult Difficult match with some difficult decisions for the official Very Difficult Very difficult match with many difficult situations for the official
Team work Performance
Cooperation with referee and fourth official Positive points Areas for improvement
Additional comments on Teamwork.
Evaluation of the Assistant Referee
Accuracy of signals : Offside situations, fouls, throw-ins, goal kicks, etc. Performance Positioning and movement
Flag technique Positive points
Areas for improvement
Additional comments for Assistant Referee
Key Match Incidents (KMIs)
Time Description Date 30-Dec-1899 Signature 0 Referee Assessor's Report
Assistant Referee 2
Mark*
ar error (only if final mark is 7.9 or 7.8)
eas for improvement
nt areas for improvement ake, otherwise 8.3 or above ake, otherwise 8.0 - 8.2 ficant points for improvement ectation with one clear important mistake
into the mark and
fficial separately cial; few challenging situations e difficult decisions for the official many difficult situations for the official
Example Minutes Example Minutes
Correct/Incorrect 0 CSA Referee Assessor's Report
4th Official COMPETITION: 0
TEAM A: 0 TEAM B: 0
City: 0 0 Stadium/Field: Date: 30-Dec-1899 Time: 0:00 Final score: 0 In favour of: 0 Half-time score: 0 In favour of: 0 0 Referee Assessor: Degree of Referee Level Mark Difficulty Referee: 0 0 Assistant Referee 10 0 Assistant Referee 20 0 Fourth Official: 0 0
* Without clear error (only if final mark is 7.9 or 7.8)
9.0-10 Excellent 8.5 - 8.9 Very Good 8.3 - 8.4 Good (expected level) 8.2 Satisfactory with small areas for improvement 8.0 - 8.1 Satisfactory with important areas for improvement 7.9 one clear important mistake, otherwise 8.3 or above 7.8 one clear important mistake, otherwise 8.0 - 8.2 7.5 - 7.7 Below expectation, significant points for improvement 7.0 - 7.4 Disappointing. Below expectation with one clear important mistake 6.0 - 6.9 Unacceptable
Level of difficulty must be integrated into the mark and
should be assessed for each match official separately Normal Normal match for the official; few challenging situations Difficult Difficult match with some difficult decisions for the official Very Difficult Very difficult match with many difficult situations for the official Evaluation of the Fourth Official Cooperation with the referee and assistant referees Performance Control of the technical areas Positive points
Areas for improvement
Additional comments for the Fourth Official
Key Match Incidents (KMIs)
Time Description
Date 30-Dec-1899 Signature 0
Referee Assessor's Report
4th Official 0
0 0 0:00 0 0
Mark*
ar error (only if final mark is 7.9 or 7.8)
eas for improvement
nt areas for improvement ake, otherwise 8.3 or above ake, otherwise 8.0 - 8.2 cant points for improvement ectation with one clear important mistake
into the mark and
fficial separately cial; few challenging situations difficult decisions for the official many difficult situations for the official Example Minutes
