Roles of Stakeholders

School Programme of In-service for the Term
PLANNING LESSON DEMONSTRATION
Republic of Zambia
Ministry of Education
School-Based
Continuing Professional Development
(SBCPD)
Through Lesson Study
Implementation Guidelines
3rd Edition
September 2007
REVISED DEMONSTRATION DISCUSSION

School-Based CPD through Lesson Study / Implementation Guidelines
This booklet was prepared by:
the members of
SMASTE-CPD Joint Technical Committee
Central Province, Ministry of Education
Mr. E. Tindi, Senior Education Officer – High School, Teacher Education Department
Mr. P. D. Sichone, District Education Board Secretary, Serenje District
Mr. V. Sinda, Senior Education Standards Officer – Mathematics
Mr. B. Banda, Senior Education Standards Officer – Natural Science
Ms. B. Tembo, Education Officer, Teacher Education Department
Ms. R. M. Simbeye, Senior Planning Officer
Ms. F. Kalembo, Headteacher, Kabwe High School
Mr. R. Singoyi, Subject Coordinator – Basic School, Kabwe Provincial Resource Center
Mr. K. C. Ngulube, Subject Coordinator – High School, Kabwe Provincial Resource Center
Ms. E. G. Kazeze, Ag. Subject Coordinator – High School, Kabwe Provincial Resource Center
Mr. T. Katete, Subject Coordinator – Basic School, Serenje Provincial Resource Center
Mr. H. Kabwe, Subject Coordinator – High School, Serenje Provincial Resource Center
Mr. S. Nalube, National JETS Secretary, University of Zambia
Ms. R. Twelasi, SMASTE/JETS Administrative Secretary, National Science Center
Printed by:
&
Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA)
i
Acknowledgement
This write up is a product of the experiences that have been gained through the implementation of
lesson study activities of teachers under SMASTE-CPD program in Central Province as a pilot.
The workshops conducted under the program have been valuable platforms where sharing of
experiences took place.
In this context, utmost gratitude must be given to the teachers at schools who are continuously
having lesson study as their CPDs, the facilitator, HOSs, HODs, School Heads, Deputy Heads and
Education Managers for the support and motivation rendered to sustain the program.
To you all as key and strategic stakeholders, we say thank you.
I will be failing if I don’t pay tribute to the members of the SMASTE Joint Technical Committee
spearheading the implementation and recording the observation while in the field and recording the
shared experiences during the Stakeholders’ Workshops.
Mr. E. Tindi, Senior Education Officer High School, Teacher Education Department
Mr. P.D. Sichone, District Education Board Secretary, Serenje District
Mr. V. Sinda, Senior Education Standards Officer Mathematics
Mr. B. Banda, Senior Education Standards Officer Natural Sciences
Ms. B. Tembo, Education Officer, Teacher Education Department
Ms. R.M. Simbeye, Senior Planning Offficer
Ms. F. Kalembo, Headteacher, Kabwe High School
Mr. R. Singoyi, Subject Coordinator Basic School, Kabwe Provincial Resource Center
Mr. K.C. Ngulube, Subject Coordinator High School, Kabwe Provincial Resource Center
Ms. E.G. Kazeze, Ag. Subject Coordinator High School, Kabwe Provincial Resource Center
Mr. T. Katete, Subject Coordinator Basic School, Serenje Provincial Resource Center
Mr. H. Kabwe, Subject Coordinator High School, Serenje Provincial Resource Center
Mr. S. Nalube, National JETS Secretary, University of Zambia
Ms. R. Twelasi, SMASTE/JETS Administrative Secretary, National Science Center
Last but not the least, I wish to extend our gratitude to JICA through the Technical Adviser for the
Technical and Professional support rendered during the development of the School-Based CPD
Implementation Guidelines.
The Ministry of Education is indebted to you all for the realization of this book.
Ruth M. Mubanga (Mrs)

Director for Teacher Education and Specialized Services (TESS)
ii
Preface
Teacher Education is one of the core programmes in Education and Skills Development Sector
stated in our “Fifth National Development Plan (FNDP) 2006-2010”, and strengthening the system
for Continuing Professional Development (CPD) is described as one of the key objectives for the
development of our education (Item 16.5).
The Ministry of Education has taken the following measures to ensure that CPD of teachers is
enhanced. This realisation comes from the fact that like any other professionals, teachers have a
responsibility to themselves and their professions to deepen their knowledge extend their
professional skills and keep themselves up to date on major developments affecting their
performances. In order for the teachers to develop professionally, a conducive learning
environment must be created. This is precisely why the school-based CPD structures have been
established and content developed.
School-Based Continuing Professional Development (SBCPD) of teachers / educators has been

institutionalised in Basic and High schools as well as Colleges of Education. It is now a regular
feature in our school / college curriculum. The Ministry of Education has further developed
guidelines to facilitate implementation of the school-based programmes. The Ministry has
recognised the roles of various stakeholders that are keys to the successful implementation of the
CPD programmes starting with the national level responsible for giving policy direction down to the
school / college head responsible for managing the implementation. The Ministry has further
recognised the supportive role of Teachers Resource Centres as Learning Stations.
The Ministry is committed to strengthening and consolidating the school / college based CPD
programmes. The initiative in Central Province on SMASTE School-Based CPD programme is
fully supported, because its objective is to improve teaching and learning at classroom by focusing
not only on the lesson preparations through Lesson Study but also most importantly takes
cognizant of the supportive role to be played by education managers and in-service co-ordinators
at various levels.
In this point of view, we realize that school / college based CPD firmly supports our aims and
strategies. The concept of the program is quite simple and clear. It can be conducted in the
existing framework of School Program of In-service for the Term (SPRINT) and maximize the use
of our existing resources to support continuing studies of teachers at school level.
Ministry of Education, therefore, urges the users of this document to take advantage of the
structures and frameworks that have been established as “Implementation Guidelines”. The
approach used in the program is the “Lesson Study”, which shall be appealing to all the teachers
who are committed to their professional development. It is strongly recommended for the teachers
and school managers to use this document for their effective management of school-based CPD
activities. I trust that it will be a valuable addition to the available materials on strengthening
teaching and learning at our classrooms.
At this moment in time, I would like to express our sincere gratitude to Japan International
Cooperation Agency (JICA) for their technical co-operation to this program.
Lilian E.L Kapulu (Mrs)

Permanent Secretary
iii
Contents
Acknowledgement / Preface / Acronyms
PART I: Implementation Guidelines
1. What is School-Based CPD through Lesson Study -------------------------------------- 1

1.1 Framework of School-Based CPD through Lesson Study
1.2 Venue for Learning
1.3 Learning Module – Lesson Study
2. Detailed Framework of the Program -------------------------------------------------------- 7

2.1 Basic Design of Core Activities
2.2 Stakeholders’ Workshop
2.3 Facilitators’ workshop
2.4 School-based CPD Meetings (HIM, TGM or Departmental Meeting)
2.5 Roles and Responsibilities of Stakeholders
3. Monitoring and Evaluation --------------------------------------------------------------------- 21

3.1 Monitoring on Program Activities
3.2 Reports on the Program
3.3 Evaluation of the Program
PART II: Useful Information Based on Experience
1. Procedure for introducing the Program ---------------------------------------------------- 27

1.1 Orientation of PEST
1.2 Roles and Responsibilities of Committee Members
1.3 Planning Implementation
1.4 Conduct of Baseline Survey
2. Consideration for Geographical Differences on Implementation -------------------- 30

2.1 Urban Area
2.2 Semi-Rural Area
2.3 Rural Area
3. Clustering and Allotment of Facilitators --------------------------------------------------- 31
4. Levels of Organization and Arrangement of Activities --------------------------------- 31

4.1 School Level
4.2 Cluster Level
4.3 District Level
4.4 Provincial Level
4.5 National Level
5. Anticipated Challenges and Possible Counter-measures ----------------------------- 35

5.1 Challenges related to Management of the program
5.2 Challenges related to Schools and Teachers
PART III: Sample Formats and Programs for Activities
1. Monitoring & Evaluation Format 01 – Implementation Monitoring Format --------- 39

2. Monitoring & Evaluation Format 02 – Lesson Assessment Format ------------------ 41
3. Monitoring & Evaluation Format 03 – Questionnaire for Pupils ------------------------ 43
4. Monitoring & Evaluation Format 04 – Questionnaire for Teachers ------------------- 45
5. Monitoring & Evaluation Format 05 – Questionnaire for School Managers -------- 46
6. Sample for analyzing results on Baseline and End-line survey ------------------------ 47
7. Sample for analyzing CIPP components on the implementation of SBCPD ------- 49
iv
8. Termly School Implementation Report --------------------------------------------------- 50

9. Sample program for the 1st Stakeholders’ Workshop -------------------------------- 51
10. Sample program for 2nd – 6th Stakeholders’ Workshop ------------------------------ 53
11. Sample program for Facilitators’ Workshop -------------------------------------------- 55
12. Sample of District Implementation Plan -------------------------------------------------- 56
o District Committee Members
o Allocation of Zones/Schools
o District Implementation Programme
13. Sample School Implementation Plan ----------------------------------------------------- 58
14. Sample Lesson Plan for 1st Demonstration Lesson ---------------------------------- 59
15. Sample Lesson Plan for Revised Lesson (2nd Demonstration Lesson) --------- 60
References
Acronyms
CIPP Context, Input, Process, Products
CPD Continuing Professional Development
DEBS District Education Board Secretary
DESO District Education Standards Officer
DEST District Education Support Team
DRC District Resource Centre
DRCC District Resource Centre Coordinator
EO-TED Education Officer, Teacher Education Department
ESO Education Standards Officer
FW Facilitators’ workshop
GRACE Grade Meeting at Resource Centre
HIM Headteacher’s In-service Meeting
HOD Head of Department
HOS Head of Section
ISTC In Service Training Centre
JOCV Japan Overseas Cooperation Volunteers
JTC Joint Technical Committee
PEO Provincial Education Officer
PESO Principal Education Standards Officer
PEST Provincial Education Support Team
PRC Provincial Resource Centre
PRCC Provincial Resource Centre Coordinator
PTA Parents Teachers Association
SESO Senior Education Standards Officer
SIMON School In-service and Monitoring
SMARC Subject Meeting at Resource Centre
SMASE Strengthening of Mathematics and Science in Education
SMASTE Strengthening of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education
SPRINT School Program of In-service for the Term
SW Stakeholders’ Workshop
TED Teacher Education Department
TGM Teachers Group Meeting
WECSA West, East, Central and Southern Africa
ZAME Zambia Association for Mathematics Education
ZASE Zambia Association for Science Education
ZATE Zambia Association for Technology Education
ZEST Zone Education Support Team
ZIC Zone In-service Coordinator
ZRC Zone Resource Centre
v
“P rofessionalism:
Teaching should be regarded as a profession: it is a form of public
service which requires of teachers expert knowledge and specialized
skills, acquired and maintained through rigorous and continuing study; it
also calls for a sense of personal and corporate responsibility for the
education and welfare of the pupils in their charge.”
The 1966 ILO/UNESCO Recommendation concerning the Status of Teachers

(Provision III.6)
vi
IMPLEMENTATION GUIDELINES
1. What is School–Based CPD through Lesson Study
Like other professionals, teachers have a responsibility, to themselves and to their

own profession, to deepen their knowledge, extend their professional skills, and
keep themselves up-to-date on major developments affecting their profession
especially in areas of pedagogy and subject content.
Teaching is a learned and a learning profession, and every teacher should also be
a learner. Realising that teachers needed to continuously improve on their
teaching methodologies and content delivery and the fact that it is not possible to
send all teachers for in-service training in the colleges; the Zambian government
has put in place measures to enhance Continuing Professional Development
(CPD).
“Educating Our Future”, a policy document of the Ministry of Education suggests

strategic approaches for In-service teacher education (Ministry of Education, 1996,
p.116) such as:
• Programs which are demand driven, responding to identified needs

• Programs which focus on school needs and are based in Schools or
Resource Centres
• Cost-effective programs which enable large numbers of teachers to have
opportunities for learning
• Programs which include not only studies on subject contents but also
methodologies, use of materials or way of management in classrooms
Based on these approaches, School Program of In-service for the Term (SPRINT)
was inaugurated by Teacher Education Department (TED) in the Ministry of
Education as a framework for life long learning of teachers both in basic and high
schools. However, not all the schools have implemented stable and effective
meetings for teachers. Even the schools which have regularly conducted CPD
meetings have been seeking for better ways of improving quality of teacher group
or departmental meetings. School–Based Continuing Professional Development
(SBCPD) is now introduced to upper-basic and high school to ensure and enhance
learning activities of teachers.
The purpose of the program is to
improve teaching and learning School-Based CPD aims to Improve
activities in a classroom through Teaching and Learning Activities in
lesson study (refer to figure 1) by Classroom through Lesson Study
strengthening CPD activities of all by Strengthening CPD Activities of
all subject / learning areas at school
subjects / learning areas at school
and college Level.
and college level.
This program has been implemented in Central Province since 2006 as

Strengthening of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education – Continuing
Professional Development Program (SMASTE-CPD Program). As its effectiveness
on the improvement of teaching skills of teachers and sustainability as a framework
1
of School-Based CPD were recognized, the focus of the program is now extended
to all subjects and to all the provinces in the country by the Ministry of Education.
1.1 Framework of School–Based CPD through Lesson Study

The majority of classroom teachers are
School-Based CPD fully already loaded by several activities within
uses Existing Framework the school and with programs conducted by
and Resources. the Ministry and other organizations.
Introducing a new system or framework of
teacher education may also require a lot of
additional tasks to the Ministry and all stakeholders. Considering this, it is
advisable to utilize the existing framework of teacher education and to strengthen
it, so that concentration is on the improvement of the teaching profession.
Fortunately, we have SPRINT-CPD as a system that enables all the teachers to

have a chance for improving their knowledge and skills for teaching continuously at
school level. School-Based CPD uses
Teachers Group Meeting (TGM) and
Headteachers’ In-service Meeting (HIM) in Teachers will be assessed
on their performance
SPRINT as a venue of learning of teachers.
based on their participation
Grade Meeting at Resource Centre (GRACE) in School-Based CPDs.
and Subject Meeting at Resource Centre
(SMARC) are also considered as venues of
workshops for stakeholders and facilitators. These types of meetings take place
regularly throughout a year and monitored by School In-service and Monitoring
(SIMON) program. Teachers will be assessed on their performance based on their
key result areas which will include among other things their participation during
school based CPDs. The School Based CPD also works with Subject Association
as stakeholder for CPD activities.
1.2 Venue for Learning

School-Based CPD targets a school as
a venue of teacher professional
School-Based CPD activities
shall be school based and development. A school is a place,
always put its Focus on the where teaching and learning always
Classroom. take place. It is believed that the
improvements are devised within the
classroom. It is in the classroom where teachers are experiencing problems and
concerns on teaching, and where educators should always focus their interventions
on. Therefore, the venue for CPD activities should be at school with special focus
on the classroom activities.
The Ministry of Education in Zambia has a clear policy for CPD as mentioned in the
Educating Our Future (1996) which encourages INSET for teachers to be school
based. It is from this policy document that all the levels of education provision are
2
encouraged to provide necessary CPD for its human resource. Under School-
Based CPD, each school is requested to have Teacher Group Meetings (TGM)
and Headteachers’ In-service Meetings (HIM) regularly initiated by the Head of
Department / Senior Teacher with the assistance of facilitators. The role of the
School Head is that of creating a conducive teaching and learning environment,
while the Deputy Head is responsible for the day to day teaching and, therefore, in-
charge of school based CPDs. Thus, the role of the administration is very crucial in
the planning and resource mobilization for the school based CPDs.
The main actors in the meetings are the teachers. They are free to discuss their
concerns on teaching and to
exchange knowledge and skills in the
Teachers are main actors in groups. However, the experts from
School-Based CPD.
various educational institutions could
be invited occasionally as observers.
1.3 Learning Module - “Lesson Study”

The learning module in Zambia will be those which will encourage learner centred
teaching and learning as much as possible. The School Based CPD shall be
based on the 'Lesson Study' approach which has been implemented for a long
time in some countries such as Japan, America, Australia, Philippines and
Malaysia and has been found to be effective for improving classroom teaching and
sustainable as a teacher education CPD program.
Lesson study is a problem solving process of teacher professional development

practiced in Japan from as far back as 1960 and is still being used in the Japanese
schools. In this approach, small groups of teachers of less than 10 would meet
regularly at least once a month to plan, implement, evaluate and revise lessons
collaboratively. “Educating Our Future”, a policy document of the Ministry of
Education suggests strategic approaches on pedagogy through the Inspectorate,
Teacher Training Colleges, Resource Centres as well as school-based activities.
The Ministry will promote a variety of teaching strategies with focus on stimulating
learning through inquiry, guided-discovery, problem-solving, application, and
similar activity-based teaching and learning. It is expected that CPD meetings will
be organized by the teachers through the existing structure of authority within the
school but mostly by teachers at school level or district level to improve their
teaching competencies. In the lesson
study process, teachers will collaborate to School-Based CPD adopts
share, discuss and analyze teacher's Lesson Study Approach.
teaching and students learning while
working together to design a lesson plan.
In the Lesson study approach, one of the teachers in a school is requested to have
demonstration lesson using pupils, while other members observe with specific
tasks for analyzing the lesson. After the demonstration, a discussion on the lesson
will be held to improve skills of members on conducting better lesson with some
3
input from facilitators and other observers including pupils’ evaluation on the
lesson. For every school term, a specific theme on key factors and components for
effective lesson will be given to schools.
Lesson study usually follows eight (8) steps of activities which forms a cycle
described below (Chiew & Lim, 2005: Stigler & Hiebert, 1999). These activities
have been described further at Section 2.4.5. in this book.
8. Reflections Compiled and Shared
1. Defining Problems or Challenge
7. Discuss the Lesson & Reflect again

2. Collaboratively Planning the Lesson
6. Teach the Revised Lesson 3. Implementing Demo-Lesson
5. Revise the Lesson 4. Discuss Lesson & Reflect on its Effect
Figure 1: The Cycle of Lesson Study at School
1. Defining the Problem or Challenge
As earlier stated Lesson Study is an approach which uses problem solving

approach. Therefore it is very important in this approach to define the
problem that will motivate and direct the work of the lesson study group.
This will allow teachers to voice out their challenges they have encountered
during their teaching career and this marks the beginning of solving the
problem. The problems to be identified will vary from general to specific;
others will have to deal with Ministry of Education policy, directives or
curriculum and assessment issues to mention but a few.
2. Collaboratively Planning the Lesson
In this session teachers will come together to plan for a lesson based on
the identified needs in a collaborative nature. The teachers will often start
planning the lesson by looking at the available resources such as reference
books and articles produced by other teachers who have attempted to solve
similar problems. Together they will develop and own the lesson plan
3. Implementing Demo-Lesson (Seeing a Lesson Plan being implemented in a

class while others observe)
Using agreed criteria, a teacher is selected to implement the lesson in a

classroom situation while other teachers observe and evaluate the lesson
4
based on specific items of concern. At this stage education standard

officers as well as education experts will come in and observe where
applicable together with the facilitators for a particular zone. The Heads as
well as Deputy heads are encouraged to be in attendance.
4. Discuss the Lesson and Reflect on its Effects
After the lesson the teachers will meet to discuss and reflection on the
lesson. The discussion will mostly allow the teacher who was teaching to
give his/her own critique of the lesson then followed by the other observers.
The observers will share their observations. What is important at this stage
is that the critique should not be centred on the teacher but of the lesson
and suggests the improvements.
5. Revise the Lesson
Together as a team, the lesson plan is revised based on the critique and
reflections. Changes and adjustments are made and a new lesson plan is
made ready for presentation to another class by the same teacher.
6. Teach the Revised Lesson
The actual situation in Zambia is that one teacher teaches the same subject
to more than one class in a particular school. This therefore gives us an
advantage to repeat the same lesson in a different class. The lesson which
was discussed together with reflections by the group is now taught by the
same teacher but in a different class.
7. Discuss the Lesson and Reflect on its Effect again
It is very important that another discussion on the lesson could be done so

that an observation of a change in the way the lesson is implemented could
be observed even further amendments could be made again. However
even a minimal improvement should be appreciated. At this point the
teachers can adopt such type of lesson plan for future use. If chance is
available this trial of the lesson could be done although this is optional.
8. Reflection Compiled and Shared (Teachers share reflection on new version

of the lesson)
At this moment progress report by respective stakeholders such as

Teachers HODs, HOS, Facilitators, Heads and Standards Officers will meet
at a common place such as a resource centre to exchange experiences
from various schools. This will also allow other Districts to meet and share
experiences at annual conferences for Subject Associations, SMASE-
WECSA and SMASTE. Further development of such materials be
documented and published in Journals or newsletters as alternatives which
have worked.
The framework for conducting these lesson study activities in SPRINT is shown in
Figure 2 on the next page.
5
Assistance of Facilitators Support by Education Managers Support by College & PTAs
SPRINT
TGM HIM
- (Step 1) Defining Problem & Challenge - (Step 4) Discuss Lesson & Reflect on its
- (Step 2) Collaboratively Planning the Effect
Lesson - (Step 7) Discuss the Lesson & Reflect again
- (Step 3) Implementing Demo-Lesson - (Step 8) Reflections Compiled & Shared
- (Step 5) Revise the Lesson
- (Step 6) Teach the Revised Lesson
SIMON
GRACE/SMARC - Internal Monitoring of School Managers
- Conduct of Stakeholders’ & Facilitators’ - Monitoring by Education Managers
Workshops
- Conduct of Orientation workshops
Effective School Management Commitment of Stakeholders Use of Existing Resources
Figure 2: Framework of School-Based CPD through Lesson Study
6
2. Detailed Framework of the Program
2.1 Basic Design of Core Activities
As stated in 1.1 School-Based CPD uses components in SPRINT as venues and

system of learning. However, its main learning areas are only three namely:
1) Stakeholders’ Workshop
2) Facilitators’ Workshops
3) Cluster or School-Based CPD activities
Stakeholders’ Workshops and Facilitators’ Workshops take place at suitable

venues preferably schools or colleges during every school holiday, while school-
based CPD activities are conducted regularly in respective schools during school
terms.
The workshops and School-based CPDs, which are conducted in the following
school term of the workshops, form a basic INSET cycle of learning module (Refer
to Part II, Implementation in the Zone and School). As shown in Figure 3, three (3)
cycles can be conducted in a year. Only in the last cycles of each year will there
be no school-based CPD in November because of the National Examinations.
Six (6) cycles in two (2) years are considered as one (1) learning module under
School-Based CPD.
The main activities in School-Based CPD are

“Stakeholders’ Workshop”, “Facilitators’ Workshop”
and “School-based CPD activities”
Venue Dec. Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May Jun. July Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov.
1st year
Stakeholders’
1 2 3
Workshop
Facilitators
Workshop 1 2 3
Cluster or
School-based 1-1 1-2 1-3 2-1 2-2 2-3 3-1 3-2
CPD (TGM)
2nd year
Stakeholders’
4 5 6
Workshop
Facilitators
Workshop 4 5 6
Cluster or
School-based 4-1 4-2 4-3 5-1 5-2 5-3 6-1 6-2
CPD (TGM)
Figure 3: Time-table for Workshops and School-based CPD

(e.g.: “2-3” in the table shows that schools
have the 3rd cycle of lesson study in the 2nd school term.)
7
In order to have a harmonized studying system, it is recommended that two-year

Learning Module would have a specific theme for learning. For example, in the
Central Province, the module theme for the period from 2006 to 2007 was “Key
Factors and Components for Effective Science Lesson in Zambia”.
Within the main learning module, it is also recommended that each cycle would
have a sub theme so as to guide and concentrate the efforts on one particular area
for the term. The sub theme or topic of discussion for the first school term should
be “How to conduct a lesson study in a school”. Sub themes from 2nd to 6th cycles
shall be considered on the needs of teachers and result of technical on the
teachers survey (Refer to sample analysis in Part III).
2.2 Stakeholders’ Workshop
As stated in 2-1, one of the activities

to be done will be a Stakeholders’
Stakeholders’ Workshop is held Workshop at resource centres or
at the end of the term
schools. This workshop is planned
during every school holiday.
and held at provincial or district level
according to the strategy made in
respective province. Facilitators, Heads of Department, Senior Teachers, Deputy
Heads and Heads are requested to participate in the workshop which is facilitated
and monitored by PEO’s and DEBS office. The objectives, when, where, duration
and proposed activities for this workshop are stated as below:
2.2.1 Workshop Objectives
For All Stakeholders:

• To make stakeholders aware of the framework for the programme and roles
to be played.
• To exchange information and experiences on the implementation of the
programme to have better practices for improvement
• To address needy areas.
• To compare their school performance with others.
• To learn new knowledge.
• To acquire new skills.
For Facilitators:
• To strengthen the facilitation skills
of facilitators supporting school
based CPD activities
• To make facilitators aware of the
termly topic focus for school based
CPD
• To consolidate progress report on
facilitation of school-based CPD
8
For Deputy Head:

• To strengthen their knowledge and skills on the implementation of school-
based CPD activities
• To consolidate progress report on school-based CPD activities
For Headteachers:
• To strengthen their knowledge and skills on the management of schools
including teacher professional development through school-based CPD
activities
• To exchange information and experiences on school management
• To consolidate school development report
2.2.2 When
The school calendar has a lot of activities. Therefore it will be of much help if a
proper time schedule is allocated to stakeholders’ workshop without causing an in
balance on the day to day activities of a stakeholder in the education system. Since
we need to call stakeholders to one venue for this workshop, we therefore suggest
in our approach to conduct such a workshop during the school holiday and these
will be in April, August, and December. These days will vary with the education
calendar should there be a change, the dates will also change accordingly.
2.2.3 Where
The Zambian government has

constructed 3 types of resource
centres in the country namely It is recommended to have
Workshops at our Schools in
Provincial Resource Centre (PRC)
terms of cost-effectiveness and
one or two in each province, District maximizing resources.
Resource Centre (DRC) in each
district and many Zone Resource
Centre (ZRC) geographically located to be as close to a teacher as possible. It is
such venues that we hope to use for facilitation and school management
workshops. However, due to large numbers of participants, venues such as
colleges of education or schools could
be convenient, instead of a resource
centres. Having workshops at schools
contributes to maximize our existing
resources and to save unnecessary
costs for renting conference rooms and
equipment from guest houses or hotels.
Hosting workshops shall also provide, to
the schools, the opportunity to review its
management and teamwork of school
staff.
9
2.2.4 Duration
The duration of such a workshop will be on average of about 2 – 3 days. However,

this is just a suggested approach, which could be adjusted, to suit the program
needs.
2.2.5 Proposed Program Design for Stakeholders’ Workshop
Day Activity Participants Facilitators

1 Plenary: Facilitators, Heads HoDs, PEST
Orientation of Cycles and Senior Teachers and
Modules in School-Based Deputy Heads
CPD DEST and ZEST
2 Group session: Facilitators, HoDs, Senior PEST
Input on facilitation skills Teachers and Deputy
Heads, DEST and ZEST
Group session: Heads PEST
Foundation of school
management
3 Group session: Facilitators, HoDs, Senior PEST
Demonstration of facilitation Teachers and Deputy
(Practice of Lesson Study) Heads, DEST and ZEST
Group session: Heads PEST
Management on School-
Based CPD
Note: 1. During the implementation stage, the small group sessions conducted in
parallel are needed to be considered when conducting the workshop so that
there is effective participation.
2. In case that the workshop is held at district level, PEO’s office will
monitor and provide support to the DEST.
2.3 Facilitators’ Workshop
As stated in 2-1, Facilitators’ Workshop

is one of the learning areas in the
program. This workshop is held at
provincial, district or zone level
according to the strategy made in
respective province and district.
Teachers and education officers working
as facilitators under the program are
expected to attend. The objectives,
when, where, duration and proposed
activities for this workshop are stated as
below. This is a venue for facilitators to have additional inputs on their skills of
facilitation and ideas for conducting practical works in schools.
10
2.3.1 Workshop Objectives
For Facilitators:
• To strengthen the facilitation skills of facilitators supporting school-based
CPD activities
• To make facilitators aware of the termly topic focus for school-based CPD
• To have content masterly and idea on practical works in each subject
• To develop a plan of action for presentation to stakeholders during the
stakeholders workshop
• To consolidate progress report on facilitation of school-based CPD
2.3.2 When
The school calendar has a lot of activities. Therefore, it will be of much help if a
proper time schedule is allocated to facilitators’ workshop without causing an in
balance on the day to day activities of facilitators in the education system. Since
we need to call all facilitators to one venue for this workshop, we therefore suggest
in our approach to conduct such a workshop during the school holiday and these
will be in April, August, and
December. These days will vary with
Facilitators’ Workshop is also held the education calendar should there
at the end of the term
be a change, the dates will also
during every school holiday.
change accordingly.
2.3.3 Where
These are meetings with a special focus – developing and sharpening skills and
content mastery and in line with the framework they are GRACE/SMARC
meetings. Since the facilitators learn practical works in their subjects, a school or
college will be used for this type of workshop. It is such venues that we hope to
use for facilitation and school management workshops.
2.3.4 Duration
The duration of such a workshop will be

on average of about 2 days. However
this is just a suggested approach, which
could be adjusted, to suit the program
needs
11
2.3.5 Proposed Program Design for Facilitators’ Workshop
Day Activity Participants Resource Person

1 Plenary: HoDs, HoSs, PEST, DEST
Reports from facilitators A/DRCC, DRCCs, Identified Persons
on the implementation Senior Teachers and (e.g. JOCV, College
of School Based CPD Teachers Lecturers etc.)
Group sessions: HoDs, HoSs, PEST, DEST
Inputs on Practical Works A/DRCC, DRCCs, Identified Persons
and idea on improvising Senior Teachers and (e.g. JOCV, College
teaching materials Teachers Lecturers etc.)
2 Group sessions: HoDs, HoSs, PEST, DEST
Inputs on Practical A/DRCC, DRCCs, Identified Persons
Works and idea on Senior Teachers and (e.g. JOCV, College
improvising teaching Teachers Lecturers etc.)
materials
District Planning for the Same as above DESO, DRCC,
next term School Facilitators
2.4 School-Based CPD Meetings (HIM, TGM or Departmental Meeting)
Another important and main activity of the program will be a school-based CPD in
form of:
1. The Headteacher’s In-service Meeting (HIM)
2. The Teachers’ Group Meeting (TGM) or departmental meeting.
As outlined under 2-1 Basic Design of Core Activities, this will take place soon after
the stakeholders’ workshop
following the agreed cycles. The Teachers Meeting as school-based
objectives, when, where, duration CPD is held regularly at school.
and proposed activities for such
meetings will be as stated below:
2.4.1 School Based CPD Objectives
• To review and plan the term’s work

• To improve teaching/learning activities in classroom through lesson study
• To create a sense of reflection in a teacher before, during and after the lesson
• To strengthen the network of teachers both within and outside of the school
(cluster or satellite schools)
• To monitor and evaluate the CPD activities
2.4.2 When
As stated, the school calendar has a lot of activities therefore it will be of much help
if a proper time schedule is allocated to TGMs without causing an in-balance on
12
the day to day activities of a teacher in the education system. We therefore

suggest in our approach to conduct such TGMs during the school day outside
teaching time and conduct lesson demonstrations during lesson time so that the
developed lesson be tried in an actual class. The Zambian teacher has more than
one class which he or she teaches the same subject. It is, therefore, hoped that the
revised lesson could be tried for the same grade but a different class. In an event
that the school has only one class, it can be split into two groups. This will not
cause an in balance in the coverage of the syllabus but contribute to the quality of
lesson provision hence achieving the desired task of quality education provision.
This will take place at least once a month within which to conduct the lesson study
cycle or three times per term at regular intervals.
2.4.3 Where
The movement of teachers from the

school to far away places has not
proved to be cost effective as most of
the time the teacher will not be
attending to the needs of the pupils.
This has been a concern of the
Zambian Government as such types of
INSET have had no sustainability and
retention of good practices. In order to
come up with a cost effective and
sustainable INSET with long term
positive results we are suggesting that this type of INSET be conducted as close
to the learner as possible such as in a school (in class, department), zone centre or
cluster. Moreover the pupils and administrators will be seeing the direct benefits of
INSET for their teachers.
The Zambian government has constructed resource centres through out the
country which are as close to the schools as possible. These are Provincial
Resource Centres, District Resource Centres, and Zone Resource Centres. Were
applicable school resource rooms as well as departments could be used. These
will greatly help in the provision of meeting places making the conduction of
school-based INSET cost effective and sustainable. Above all the needs for the
teachers will be localized and addressed based on the geographical needs of each
school or resource centre. Most of the Upper Basic Schools have less number of
teachers. In some cases, you may find one teacher for certain subject in a school,
therefore, for upper-basic schools; the cluster approach shall be used as a way of
conducting teacher group meeting.
N.B.: School Heads should consider the possibility of creating one day in a
term or year and designate it as a CPD Day that will be characterised by
Lesson Demonstrations and discussions. This would be ideal for the
Zone / cluster meetings.
13
2.4.4 Duration
Since School-Based CPD adopts a bottom up approach, the respective schools will
decide the duration of the INSET based on the needs and complexity of the
problem they are trying to address. However, a meeting and discussion of the
teachers should not be less than an hour.
2.4.5 How
In 1-3, under Learning Module, it is

suggested that the main approach will be School-Based CPD follows
that of lesson study which has the eight (8) 8 steps for Lesson Study.
steps. It is therefore important to consider
these steps as TGM or HIM conducted in
schools. The following activities shall be conducted in respective schools, although
the activities here shall be arranged and modified based on the needs of teachers
and schedule of other school activities.
Step 1: Defining the Problem or Challenge (1-2 hours meeting)
a. Have a meeting of all teachers for your target subject (including

seconded teachers) in a school and discuss problems/concerns and
challenges in teaching specific subject, especially bearing in mind the
following questions;
- Which topic is difficult to teach?

- What is the problem in teaching such topic?
- What points or what methods does the teacher want to learn?
- What are the suggested solutions made by the teacher?
Note: The ideal total number of teachers in one TGM is anticipated to

be 5 to 15. Schools with large numbers of teachers may have two
groups of teachers for CPD. Schools, which only have few teachers for
certain subject, are requested to use a cluster or zonal approach to
have their CPD meeting.
b. With the initiative of HOD/HOS, make a termly plan for lesson study
based on these problems and suggested solutions. Then the following
matters should be defined.
- Schedule of Demonstration Lessons and Discussions during the

school term
- Demonstration Teacher
- Topic for Demonstration
- Classes to be used for Demonstration Lesson and Revised
Lesson respectively
- Tasks for respective teachers in conducting lesson study (e.g.
chair person, secretary etc.)
14
Step 2: Collaboratively Planning the Lesson (2-3 days)
a. Ask demonstration teacher or

group of teachers to prepare initial
lesson plan
b. Have a meeting of all teachers for
specific subject to discuss the
initially prepared lesson plan and
give suggestions for improvement
c. Demonstration teacher or group of
teachers finalize lesson plan for
demonstration
d. Define the points of observation and allocate observation task to each
teacher (e.g. Introduction, Lesson Objectives, Use of teaching materials
etc.)
Step 3: Implementing Demo-Lesson (1 usual lesson period)
a. Conduct demonstration lesson in an actual

classroom with pupils
b. All teachers for specific subject observe
demonstration lesson with specific point of
observation allocated before the lesson
(e.g. introduction, questioning of teacher,
lesson evaluation, conclusion, classroom
management etc)
c. Record the observation result
Step 4: Discuss the Lesson and Reflect on its Effects (1-2 hours meeting)
a. Have a post-demonstration meeting with teachers observed demo-

lesson to critique the lesson and get points of improvement
- Ask demonstration teacher’s impression on the lesson first
- Critique lesson based on the observation (Discuss good points
and points for improvement)
- Have an agreement on how to revise the lesson
Note: The critique should not be centred on a teacher but the lesson
Step 5: Revise the Lesson (1-2 days)
a. Demonstration teacher or group of teachers revise the lesson plan

based on the suggestions and comments given in the discussion
Step 6: Teach the Revised Lesson (1 usual lesson period)
a. Conduct revised lesson in the same grade but different class or split
class of pupils
15
b. All the sciece teachers observe revised lesson with special attention on
the points of improvement
c. Record the observation result
Step 7: Discuss the Lesson and Reflect on its Effect again (1-2 hrs meeting)
a. Have a second post-demonstration

meeting with all teachers observed
lesson to discuss if it has been
improved and to define what the
teacher has learned during the
lesson study cycle
b. Record the discussion and file it as
school-CPD report
Step 8: Reflection Compiled and Shared (termly)
a. HOD/HOS and Heads/Deputy Head prepare report on school-based

lesson study done as CPD and submit it to district office
b. Contents of the reports are summarized by DEBS office and shared
with other schools in the next Stakeholders’ Workshop.
c. Outstanding practices on lesson study as school-CPD are shared
at national level conferences
2.5 Roles and Responsibilities of Stakeholders
The key stakeholders in the CPD program have been identified as Teachers,
Facilitators, Heads of Department (HOD)/ Heads of Section (HOS), Deputy Heads,
Heads (Principals), Standards Officers , Zone Heads and Zone INSET co-
ordinators, DRCCs and District Education Board Secretary (DEBS), Teacher
Educators. It is necessary that every stakeholder shall work to ensure the
implementation and quality of
the activities under the
All the stakeholders shall cooperate
to have effective School-Based CPD. programme in collaboration with
other stakeholders.
All identified stakeholders have roles and responsibilities expected of them as

outlined below:
Teachers
Teachers in the schools are the main actors in the programme and should be
beneficiaries. They are requested to create effective CPD meetings at school with
the initiative of HOD/HOS/Senior Teachers and in collaboration with facilitators and
Deputy Heads who will join the meetings. They are also expected to;
- Collaboratively prepare lesson plans
16
- Demonstrate in the lessons
- Observe lessons demonstrated by fellow teachers
- Participate in discussions after lesson
- Revise the lesson plan
- Record discussions and prepare report on CPD meeting
- Implement acquired skills in their own classrooms
Facilitators
These are classroom teachers or teacher educators who have been identified as
focal persons in a given cluster or zone. Each facilitator shall be requested to
assist school-based CPD activities not only in his/her school but also some schools
assigned to him/her. They will effectively participate in the school based CPD by:
- Assisting teachers in the planning of CPD activities in the schools assigned
- Checking lesson plans before lesson demonstrations are conducted.
- Effectively participating in the lesson planning during the pre-demo sessions
- Observing demonstration lessons
- Facilitating discussions after lesson demonstrations
- Preparing and submitting facilitation reports
- Attend Stakeholders Workshop.
Heads of Department (HOD)/ Heads of Section (HOS) Senior Teachers
The HODs or HOSs or Senior Teachers are very important in the success of the
program, as these activities will take place within their jurisdiction. They will carry
out the following responsibilities:
- Taking an initiative to conduct school based CPD
- Planning and scheduling of activities
- Preparing of logistics e.g. venue, resources, learners
- Checking lesson plans for teachers before lesson demonstrations
- Assisting demo/teachers in preparing teaching materials
- Preparing and submitting report to immediate supervisor
17
- Record keeping
Deputy Heads
In addition to the job description the Deputy Head is expected to undertake the
following.
- Take the central role of being in-charge of CPD at school level (Planning,
Implementing, Reviewing, Reporting)
- Observe demonstration lessons
- Attend discussions as process observers not necessarily the content of the

lesson demonstrations
- Maintain and manage CPD files in the schools
- Submit reports to higher authority as required by their job description
- Participate in planning for CPD activities at school level
- Liaise with Head and HOD/HOS on CPD activities
Head teachers
The Heads oversee all school based

CPD activities by way of Institutional Heads are the key
management, co-ordination and players for enabling teachers in
monitoring. Heads have a challenge their schools to have effective
of creating a conducive learning lesson study activities.
environment. This is demanded of
them by their job description. For such a dream to be realized, an effective CPD
needs to be conducted in a school. Therefore, the following responsibilities are to
be undertaken by the Head:
- Oversee school based CPD
- Ensure that the school has a conducive environment for CPD
- Allocate resources necessary for effective school based CPD
- Monitor school-based CPD including lesson study activities of teachers through

actual visits to the classroom and meetings
- Ensure that CPD files are recorded at the school
- Read and offer guidance on reports produced by her/his subordinates
18
- Submit harmonized report to higher authorities as required by their job

description
Resource Centre Coordinator (RCC)
In line with their job description, the RCCs are expected to assist facilitators and
schools in implementing CPDs regularly especially at Upper-Basic level, which
needs to adopt cluster- or zonal-approach for CPD activities. The roles of RCC
will be to:
- Coordinate with schools and facilitators

especially at basic school level in planning
and scheduling CPD activities in schools
and zones.
- Support the CPD by helping schools and

facilitators in conducting CPD activities
- Facilitate district Stakeholders workshops.
- Support monitoring.
Standards Officer
For the system to operate and be sustainable, continuous evaluation is necessary.

This means that the Standards Officers at all levels need to be involved during the
course of the CPD activities. They are expected to;
- Be involved in the monitoring and evaluation of the CPD and give professional
advice to the stakeholders on the direction of the program
- Assist schools on the management of CPD
- Produce reports on the result of monitoring CPD
- Observe lesson demonstrations
- Participate where possible in the post - demo discussion
District Education Board Secretary (DEBS)
In the education system, the DEBSs are in-charge of education in the district. The
investment in CPD by the DEBS would provide quality sustainable school based
teacher professional development. The DEBS role will therefore be to:
- Oversee and encourage CPD in the district
- Allocate resources for CPD
19
- Advise all stakeholders on CPD matters
- Facilitate and officiate during CPDs
- Provide corrective measures during CPD
- Host stakeholders’ workshops termly.
Teacher Educators
In order to make network and cooperation between In-service and Pre-service

training of teachers, it is recommended to invite guests and staff from Teacher
Training Colleges and Universities to the workshops and meeting under the
program. The role of pre-service teacher trainers will be;
- Provide academic comments and inputs during the workshops
- Introduce Lesson Study practices to students and monitor implementation of

the same practices during their peer teaching and teaching practice
- Participate in Lesson Study at college level.
- Demonstrate lesson study to students
- Conduct action research in coordination with Joint Technical Committee

members
School Boards/College Boards/PTAs
Community involvement in education should be directed at raising the learning

achievements of pupils, increasing access, participation, retention and completion
rates among girls and other disadvantaged children.
Other Stakeholders:
As the program proceeds, we are mindful of the fact that more stakeholders such
as, Community Members and Subject Associations will be identified and
assigned activities accordingly.
20
3. Monitoring and Evaluation
3.1 Monitoring on Program Activities
Monitoring activities in School-Based CPD basically follows SIMON in SPRINT-

CPD. There are several kinds of monitoring activities to examine implementation
of the program activities and to
assess the outputs of teachers
periodically. These activities are Activities in School-Based CPD are
continuously monitored at School,
classified by their level and venue
District and Provincial Level
conducted.
3.1.1 School Level Monitoring:
HOD/HOS, Deputy Heads and Head Teachers at school level shall monitor
teachers participating in the program. Monitoring format for school-based CPD is
used to check the progress and contents of lesson study of the teachers, while
teachers’ APUS format is used to evaluate performance of respective teacher in a
school. In addition to these, facilitators are also requested to monitor school-based
CPD activities in the schools assigned to them.
3.1.2 District Level Monitoring:
DEBS office shall be responsible to monitor through standards officers if all the
schools in the districts conducts school-based CPD with lesson study approach
regularly and effectively. DEBS office shall check the reports prepared by the
schools and facilitators and take necessary measures in coordination with
provincial office if any problems and concerns appear under the program.
3.1.3 Provincial Level Monitoring:
The monitoring conducted by Provincial Office through PESO shall be on the

program itself. Through this monitoring including school-visit and reviews on the
reports submitted by DEBS office, members in project coordinating committee and
project task force will define the progress and direction of the implementation of the
program. At provincial level, necessary data for CIPP evaluation shall be collected
periodically in the form of operational and academic indicators.
Operational Indicator:
These are the data, which show operation of the activities under School Based -
CPD. The following data shall be parts of the samples. The data are used in
Input, Process Evaluation in CIPP.
• Number of Lesson Study Cycles conducted as School-CPDs
• Number of Lesson Plans prepared and revised in School-CPDs
• Number of Improvised Teaching Materials made for Lesson Study
• Number of Facilitators and Headmasters Workshop conducted
21
Academic Indicator:
These are the data, which show improvement of teachers in terms of introducing
Learner-centered approach to e.g. science or social studies lessons. The data
shall be used in Product evaluation.
• Percentage of expressions on lesson plans written in the view of
pupils/students
• Percentage of lessons that define objectives clearly and attained them
• Percentage of lessons that enabled pupils to find what the teacher wanted
to teach
• Percentage of lessons composed to teach scientific concept to pupils
• Percentage of teachers’ questions in lessons classified to each level of
Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives
• Data on pupils’ impressions on lessons
3.2 Reports on the Program
Title of Who will To who When is it What are Where is it

Report prepare? submitted? prepared? contents? filed?
School-CPD Teachers, DEBS office End of Schedule, DEBS office &
Report HOD/HOS every Contents, Result Provincial
Deputy head school of CPD activities office
Headmaster term
Facilitators Facilitators DEBS office End of Conditions and Provincial
Report Provincial every impressions on office
office school CPD attended
term
District DEBS office Provincial Every Status and Provincial
Periodical office school conditions on office
Report holiday implementation
of school-CPD
in district
Provincial Provincial Headquarters Every 6 Progress of Headquarters
Report office and Donors (if months school-CPD
necessary)
Figure 4: Reports to be prepared by the stakeholders under School-Based CPD
3.2.1 Progress and Implementation Reports
As shown in Figure 4, all schools are requested to prepare progress or

implementation report on the program and submit to the Provincial Education
Office through the DEBS office at the end of the each school term.
DEBS offices shall compile reports from the schools and summarise them as
District reports. Reports from facilitators in the field would be also good resource
for preparing District reports.
As a province, PEST members are advised to prepare progress report every six (6)
month for submitting to the Ministry Headquarters and other institutions.
22
3.2.2 Monitoring Reports
Monitoring reports shall be prepared by facilitators, Resource Centre Coordinators,

District officers and Provincial officers, whenever they conduct monitoring activities
such as school visits, attending district or school workshops and attending school-
based CPD activities. All the reports have to be submitted to Provincial Education
Office through DEBS Office.
3.3 Evaluation of the Program
In consistence with objectives of School-Based CPD, effectiveness and efficiency

of the program should be assessed by proper evaluation framework. Although
there are several kinds of evaluation models for educational programs,
Stufflebeam’s CIPP model shall be used as a tool for assessing School-Based
CPD. CIPP, which stands for different evaluation components in assessment
works – Context, Input, Process, Products, is one of the decision-making
evaluation models that enable implementers to make decisions on the program
implementation. The reason why we adopt CIPP model is a basic idea of CIPP,
which does not put too much importance on current situation or rightness of the
program but on the hints and idea for further improvement of the program. Since
School–Based CPD is continuing program that should be conducted through the
life of a teacher, we need evaluation, which provides not only the results and
outputs but also suggestions on the program implementation.
Context Input Process Product

Aim To diagnose To assess what To ensure that the To find out whether the
program changes are suggested changes are instructional program or idea
background and possible being carried out as actually made a difference
assess needs intended, and to
identify problems in
implementation
Method Using methods Using methods Monitoring the change Measuring changes in
such as such as literature process, by observing performance compared with
classroom search, visits to and recording the students’ work before the
interviews, exemplary activities that take program began, including
diagnostic tests, programs, pilot place and both the whether students have learned
analysis of trials, ideas from expected and to transfer their knowledge to
students’ written teachers in the unexpected results new problems. Measures can
work field include interviews with
participants, class tests,
analysis of students’ written
work
Decision To provide a To find where To help in fine tuning To decide whether the changes
making basis for deciding there is most the program, and also should be continued,
on what changes support for to provide data which terminated, or modified
are needed change and to can be used later to
find out which interpret the impact of
solutions are the change
most feasible
Figure 5: The 4 types of evaluation used in the CIPP model (Stufflebeam, 1983)
For conducting CIPP on School Based - CPD, specific criteria shall be set up to
23
have each evaluation on the Activities in School-Based CPD

shall be evaluated by CIPP.
component of Context, Input, Process
and Products. The aim, method and
expected decisions are shown in the Figure 5.
Fortunately, we are aware that a baseline survey was conducted by the University
of Zambia and ISTC in 2002. The data captured in this survey can be used as
baseline data for the program to have evaluations of CIPP components; however,
there still be a need to have additional research including technical baseline survey
in order to obtain quantitative and qualitative data for the assessment.
CONTEXT
- Background, Rationale - Problems & Needs - Program Objectives
INPUT PROCESS PRODUCT

- Planning - Implementation - Output (Changes
- Human Resources ¾ Activities of Teachers)
Teachers, ¾ Procedures - Impact (Changes
HOD/HOS, ¾ Formats/Schedules of Students/Pupils)
Headmasters/Deputy - Supervision - Sustainability
heads, ESO, DEBS, ¾ Coordination - Transportability
Provincial Staff ¾ Assistance/Advice - Replicability
- Facilities - Quality Control
- Equipment ¾ Monitoring
- Funds
Figure 6: CIPP Framework for evaluation of School-Based CPD
3.3.1 Context Evaluation
Context evaluation shall be conducted to assess if the program objectives are

consistent with the needs of schools and teachers. For this evaluation,
background and rationale of the program, national policies, needs of schools and
teachers, availability of resources related to target subjects, objectives of the
program shall be reviewed through documentation ( with pictorial evidence)
analysis and questionnaires to the teachers.
3.3.2 Input Evaluation
Input evaluation shall be conducted to assess if the inputs are properly done in the
program. For this evaluation, all the inputs to the program, which include funds,
human resources, facilities and equipment, shall be reviewed in terms of its
effectiveness and efficiency through questionnaires and focus group interviews to
24
the stakeholders.
3.3.3 Process Evaluation
Process evaluation shall be conducted to assess if the design and framework of

program implementation are proper and efficient. For this evaluation, activities
done under School-Based CPD and their formats shall be assessed through
questionnaires and focus group interviews with the stakeholders. To some extent
external observers could also be invited to evaluate the programme (PTA and
Board representatives)
3.3.4 Product Evaluation
Product evaluation shall be conducted to assess if the objectives of the program

are attained in terms of its outputs and the results of the activities in School-Based
CPD. For this evaluation, change of teachers’ perception on teaching specific
subject, improvement on writing lesson plans and teaching, change of pupils’
impressions on lessons for target subjects, change in pupils’ performance shall be
assessed by questionnaires and interviews to the stakeholders as baseline and
end line survey. At times it will be necessary to sample current researches/surveys
being done by individual students from colleges and Universities on performance of
target subjects. In view of this, there is need for annual review of baseline survey.
In this component, sustainability, transportability and replicability of the program in
other subjects and geographical areas shall be also examined.
3.3.5 Relationship among CIPP components
After analysing four main components in CIPP, the relationship among

components shall be discussed to find key factors on implementation and
improvement.
3.3.6 Decision Making
Based on the result of CIPP evaluation, stakeholders in the program shall be

requested to make decisions for implementation and improvement of the program.
25
USEFUL INFORMATION BASED ON EXPERIENCE
The useful information based on the pilot project in Central Province has revealed that five
(5) areas need to be given attention, if one has to embark on implementing this kind of
CPD which is school-based and focusing on Lesson Study. These are:
1. Procedures for introducing the program

2. Consideration of Geographical differences on implementation
3. Clustering and Allotment of facilitators
4. Levels of organisation and arrangement of activities
5. Anticipated challenges and possible counter measures
1. Procedures for introducing the program
1.1 Orientation of PEST
As this committee takes responsibility of the management of the program, it should

consist of the representatives from educational offices and organizations concerned
with the program. It is recommended for the committee members to have periodical
meetings to manage the implementation of the program.
Below is a sample composition of the Provincial Education Support Team (PEST) for
School-Based CPD program. The Provincial Education Officer (PEO) shall be the
program manager in the province, while the Principal Education Standards Officer
(PESO) shall be deputy manager. The composition and total number of the
committee members may vary depending on the number of institutions existing in the
province and subject to be emphasized through the program.
Sample composition of The Provincial Education Support Team for SBCPD

# Personnel Institution
1 Provincial Education Officer Provincial Education Office
2 Principal Education Standards Officer Provincial Education Office
3 Senior Education Standards Officer (Natural Science) Provincial Education Office
4 Senior Education Standards Officer (Mathematics) Provincial Education Office
5 Senior Education Standards Officer Provincial Education Office
(Practical Subject)
6 Education Officer – Teacher Education Provincial Education Office
7 Senior Planning Officer Provincial Education Office
8 Subject Coordinators for Basic School Provincial Resource Centre
9 Subject Coordinators for High School Provincial Resource Centre
10 Representative of DEBSs DEBS office
11 Representative of Headteachers High School
Note: In Central Province, this team was organized as Joint Technical Committee (JTC)
under SMASTE-CPD program.
27
Among the members of PEST, it is

recommended to choose three (3) or Good teamwork of PEST & DEST
four (4) people as “Task Force” members is a key for successful
members who will continuously plan implementation of the Program.
and coordinate the activities at ground
level. This role of Task Force can not be taken by the PEO or PESO as they have a
lot of work to do at the station.
It is also recommended that each district which implements the program would
organize District Education Support Team (DEST). The following is the suggested
composition of the DEST:
• DEBS
• DESO
• DRCC
• DPO (District Planning Officer)
• 1 Head High School
• 1 Head Basic Schools (Chairperson for Heads Association at District Level)
• 2 Facilitators from High Schools
• 2 Facilitators from Basic Schools
• 1 Zone Inset Coordinator
The PEST has to be sensitised on the program and their role and responsibilities in
the program. At this time, the Task force needs to strategize on how they would like
to orient the members. It depends on how they would like to do it. However, it should
be noted that not all members can be taken on board at the same time. For example,
we recommend that those members who are based at PEO’s or DEBS office could
be sensitised during the weekly meetings. The task force has to see that the project
manager and deputy manager are continuously kept abreast of the direction the
program is taking.
1.2 Roles and Responsibilities of Committee Members
Each member of the PEST should be assigned an area of responsibility in relation to

the functions expected to be undertaken and be held accountable. To ensure
commitment, assigned responsibilities must be closely related to their Key Result
Areas as per their Job Description. Possible allotment of the roles among PEST
members is described in the table.
When the provincial workshops such as Stakeholders’ or Facilitators’ Workshops are

held, the PEST are requested to share the tasks for the smooth conduct of the
workshop in coordination with the host institutions.
28
Possible Roles for PEST members

Roles Responsible Officer(s)
Overall coordination of the program PESO
Planning of activities under the program SESOs / EO-TED
Capturing budget and procurement of materials for the EO-TED / SPO
workshops
Issuing and filing official communication EO-TED
Recording activities and producing minutes of the Subject Coordinators
meetings
Conducting baseline and other surveys on the program Task Force
Encoding data on the implementation and surveys Task Force
Monitoring activities PEST Members
1.3 Planning Implementation
It is important that, before the program takes root, a proper planning for
implementation is done. A series of meetings among the PEST members need to
take place, so that all of the PEST members can be taken on board. Then, a detailed
implementation plan needs to be developed in coordination with DEST members.
This should give a guide as to when major activities take place including the
expected outcomes for each activity. A modular and cycle approach is
recommended. It is during the planning meeting that the sharing of activities for the
actual implementation and specific matters such as communication, venues, costs,
target audience, etc. shall be discussed and agreed upon by the members. It is also
important to consider the way which the province or district is going to be divided into
groups for the implementation. The population of schools and total number of
participants for workshops under the program need to be taken into consideration for
this grouping.
1.4 Conduct of Baseline Survey
General concerns on CPD, which alludes to poor teaching and learning, are known
in the country; however, there have been few reports which tried to reveal the effect
of CPD with specific research. There is a need to conduct technical survey on the
effect of CPD programs, so that we can get a clear picture of what is presently going
on in terms of teaching and learning and what changes are caused in the classroom
by the activities under the program. Conduct of research before and after
implementation enables us to compare those results for seeing the effects of the
program. Such data will also need to be used to design the interventions during
implementation.
Tools used for the survey should be carefully selected and prepared by PEST
members and other stakeholders to capture the status and improvement with certain
29
academic points of view. Examples of baseline survey conducted by the JTC

members in Central Province are shown in PART III.
Based on the analysis of data, topics of concentration in a CPD can be developed to

address the concerns. In doing so, it is expected that the needs for both teachers
and pupils are addressed in turn enhancing the quality of teaching and learning.
2. Consideration for geographical differences on implementation
A comprehensive understanding of the constituency is important in drawing up the

implementation plans. The following have to be considered; the grouping of Districts so
that the total number of participants is 200 – 300, distances between schools for clustering
and allotment of facilitators, number of schools in a district and zones. Zones are
established and fixed while clustering is an
Considering geographical location arrangement for cost effectiveness.
of schools is important to arrange Location of the zones and district resource
the zones and clusters for
implementing lesson study and centres as focal points for accessibility for
assign facilitators. the teachers and operational points of the
facilitators and staffing levels is important.
2.1 Urban Area

Experience has shown that, in urban areas, the population (pupils and teachers) and
concentration of schools is high. The identification of facilitators as well as clustering
needs to be done carefully because, if not well handled, no effective CPD can take
place. In general, the cost of conducting CPD is expected to be lower and easier.
However, it is necessary to develop a culture where teachers would be sent to other
schools to conduct duties like any other normal days. This would strongly reduce the
cost of conducting CPDs. If the school has enough teachers to make a quorum of
about 5 to 10 teachers in the same subject or grade, the school is highly
recommended to conduct CPD activities within its school.
2.2 Semi-Rural Area

Semi rural areas are common in most parts of Zambia. Here, the cluster approach
could be used. The idea of Zonal Heads and ZICs becoming focal point people is
important in such a case. During the Zonal Heads meetings, the planning of CPD
could be done and budgeted for as a Zone activity. Such will require teachers to
meet in a cluster, if they are few in a school. Bicycles as a cost effective means of
their transport could be considered. But, if a school has enough teachers, school
CPD could be done within such a school.
2.3 Rural Area

This tends to be the most disadvantaged area. It has schools that are far apart, with
few teachers and very poor road infrastructure. It is also in such schools that we find
30
seconded teachers teaching upper classes. Here the bottom-line is that teachers in
such schools are at the same level in terms of qualifications. In such a case, two
options could be used. The first is, if applicable, to create a cluster with schools
nearby as described under Semi-rural areas. The second is to conduct CPD using
all the members of staff available in the school, since these teachers do not teach
specific subjects.
What should be noted, however, is that the quality of CPD in all these three areas would
not be the same. In terms of time, schools in rural areas would need more time to achieve
the required results than those in urban areas. It is, therefore, important to mention that
such aspects need to be considered during planning for implementation.
3. Clustering and Allotment of Facilitators
The structures of zones are established as a Zone Resource Centre or Zone Centre
School with a Zone Head and Zone CPD co-ordinator. They are expected to co-ordinate
CPD activities alongside the teaching, hopefully with a reduced teaching load, so as to
carry out the CPD activities in the schools of their catchment areas. The clustering
arrangement is not to undo the zones but get maximum benefit from the program in terms
of facilitation and shared experiences between basic and high schools.
Several factors need to be considered in allotting a facilitator to a cluster among them

being that facilitators are classroom teachers with a teaching load. The zonal heads has
identified them during their heads meetings although the facilitator may not be from the
zone centre school. It is a person who is a model teacher who others can learn from and
has facilitation skills. Consideration could be given to the facilitator to have reduced
teaching loads, so that they can facilitate the School-Based CPD activities in the cluster;
however, most importantly can work hand in hand with the zonal Heads and ZICs in order
to take all the subjects on board. If a ZIC qualifies, he or she could be also considered as
a facilitator.
4. Levels of organisation and arrangement of activities
For the successful program implementation, a number of CPD activities have to be

conducted at various levels of our education system such as school, cluster, district,
provincial and national levels. These activities will be undertaken within the framework of
SPRINT, which has assured school-based CPD meetings of teachers, although certain
flexibility on designing activities under the program should be kept for smooth and
sustainable implementation in respective districts, clusters and schools.
4.1 School Level

The following are some of the activities which could be organized/arranged and
conducted at school level:
31
• Head teachers’ Meeting (HIM) as a venue of CPD activities which could be

reviewed once or twice per term.
• Whole school workshops where a facilitator brings new knowledge and
pedagogical skills
• Monthly lesson study activities/Fortnightly Teacher Group Meetings (TGM) or
Departmental Meetings where the 8 steps of the Lesson Study are effected
• Monitoring of the CPD meetings and Lesson Demonstrations by head teacher
and/or deputy head teacher
• Monthly report writing for submission to the next Stakeholders’ Workshop with
two kinds of lesson plans (initial and revised lesson plans)
4.2 Cluster level

Cluster meetings to be held once per month and organised by Zone head, ZIC and
facilitators. Participants at the cluster meeting should involve zone heads, school
heads, ZIC, SICs, HODs/HOSs, Senior teachers and facilitators to plan, review,
share experiences, develop cluster activity schedule/work plan, train, monitor and
prepare cluster report for submission to the district.
• Conduct whole cluster workshops where facilitators bring new knowledge and
pedagogical skills
• Convene Monthly cluster Meetings where the 8 steps of the Lesson Study are
effected/reviewed.
• Monitoring of the CPD meetings and Lesson Demonstrations by the
ZIC/SIC/HOD/HOS/Senior teacher.
• Monthly report writing for submission to the District Stakeholders’ Workshop with
two (kinds of) lesson plans (initial and revised lesson plans)
• Plan, review, share experiences.
• Develop cluster activity schedule/work plan.
• Train, monitor and prepare cluster report for submission to the district.
• Any other CPD activities as directed by the District.
4.3 District level

In the meeting of district committee
members, allocation of zones/ Assignment of facilitators to the
schools/clusters should be done well
schools should be done as the first at District Level, so that they can
step for the implementation. This effectively and efficiently assist CPD
work includes the selection and activities in schools
assignment of facilitators in the
district. The number of facilitators needed for the implementation depends on the
size of the district and geographical locations of schools; however, it is not
recommended to assign more than 5 schools to one facilitator. In case that the
district arranges groups of 2 to 3 facilitators moving together as a team, more
32
schools could be assigned to each group of facilitators. After the allocation of

facilitators, activities which can be organized by the district to enhance the
implementation of the program shall be planned by the committee members.
Meeting of all facilitators in the district, sensitization meeting for zonal head
teachers and ZICs, orientation workshop for all head teachers and deputy heads in
the districts are possible activities at district level. Monitoring activities by district
committee members could be also planned by the team. A sample of district
implementation plan is shown in PART III.
• District meetings by DEST.

• Monitoring of the CPD meetings and Lesson Demonstrations by head teacher
and/or deputy head teacher
• Monthly report writing for submission to the next Stakeholders’ Workshop with
two kinds of lesson plans (initial and revised lesson plans)
• Develop cluster activity schedule/work plan.
• Train, monitor and prepare cluster report for submission to the district.
• Any other CPD activities as directed by the Province
4.4 Provincial level

In order to foster the idea of school based CPD, the once per term Stakeholders’
Meeting is held during the holidays in a learning institution. Depending on the
district grouping, the recommended number of participants is around 200 to 300.
The composition of the participants shall be DEBS, DESOs, head teachers, deputy
head teachers and facilitators. Colleges of Education should also participate for
academic, professional as well as management purposes. The major items for
discussion would be the sharing of experiences through report presentations from
schools and planning of activities for the next school term. These discussions could
be organized as parallel sessions per district.
The theme for the term as per key factors and its components for facilitators,
deputies and CPD co-ordinators needs to be prepared. The weak points of
teachers which are revealed by technical survey should be considered for setting
up the theme. Once the theme for the next school term is set, technical inputs on
that theme shall be given to the facilitators, deputy heads and co-ordinators at
Stakeholders’ and Facilitators’ Workshop, and schools would have their lesson
study activities with careful attention on that theme in the following term.
• Provincial Meetings by PEST.

• Monitoring of the CPD meetings and Lesson Demonstrations
• Develop Provincial activity schedule/work plan.
• Any other CPD activities as directed by the PEST
33
In the case of Central Province, the topics below were set as sub-themes for
lesson study to address the main theme which were given for the first two-year
module.
Module Theme:
“Key Factors and Components for Effective Science Lesson Study in Zambia”
Sub-themes:
1st cycle: “How to conduct lesson study in a school”
2nd cycle: “Lesson Planning – Preparing good lesson plans”
3rd cycle: “Effective Questioning Techniques”
4th cycle: “Techniques on Structuring Lessons & Major teaching approaches
5th cycle: “Practice of revising Lesson plan”
6th cycle: “Review of Questioning Techniques and Delivery Skills”
For school heads and DEBS, “Effective school management” and “Effective
management of school-based CPD” could be considered as general themes on
which specific topics can be discussed arising from the common problem areas
identified during the reporting session.
Sub themes:
• Effective management of school as an organization
• Effective management of school-based CPDs
• Effective planning of school activities
• School self-evaluation and school improvement (Improvement of internal
monitoring of school managers)
• Improvement of school environment and resources
• Standard indicators for evaluating school activities
4.5 National Level

At National level, Directorate for Teacher Education and National Education Supprt
Team for the program would take responsibilities below following the strategies on
the master plan for introducing School-Based CPD through lesson study.
• Overall coordination and supervision on the program following national policy of

INSET and CPD
• Plan, review and revise the master plan for SBCPD in the country
• Facilitate and support workshops under the program held at provincial, district
and zone level
• Monitor activities under the program in coordination with PESTs, DESTs and
ZESTs
34
5. Anticipated challenges and possible counter measures
5.1 Challenges related to Management of the Program

Anticipated Possible explanations / Counter-measures
challenges
Low commitment of Problem analysis:
school management For a long time, teachers had not been viewed by the school
on professional management as people who needed improvement in their
development of learning. Instead, they were always expected to perform
teachers wonders in class with the basic knowledge they acquired during
initial teacher training.
Possible Counter-measure:
・ School management should be involved as participants of/at
the stakeholders’ workshops and a session for them in order
to deepen their managerial skills and commitment for the
program should be organized.
・ Showing them a good sample of implementing CPD activities
or taking them to model schools which has implemented
effective CPDs, so that they can start comparing themselves
with those good models.
・ Periodical monitoring activities by provincial and district
officers should be planned to monitor school managers and
CPD activities implemented in schools. (Monitoring format 01
in PART III could be used for this.)
Time management: Problem analysis:

(inadequate time at Most of the teachers and school managers always say there is
school for little or no time to conduct CPD due to various programs running
implementing lesson in schools and personal matters.
study) Possible Counter-measure:
・ regulations are that government workers in Zambia including
teachers are expected to work for 8 hours a day. However,
most teachers knock off immediately they finish teaching.
Hence the need for change of mind set and work culture. The
school deputy heads, in consultation with the HODs and
Senior Teachers or SIC and ZICs, need to make a master
plan for the school’s activities.
・ It is also necessary for school managers to orient teachers
that proper and effective study as professionals requires
certain time and efforts. There is no easy way for learning.
・ Effective supervision is also required at all levels.
35
Difficulties in Problem analysis:

monitoring & creating Schools in some areas, especially in rural areas, are far from
clusters caused by each other and this affects efforts or plans to create school
geographical location clusters for the implementation of the program. In addition, there
of schools is poor road infrastructure making some places inaccessible and
insufficient communication system among schools.
・ Arrangement of clusters should be done carefully, so that
teachers from small schools can have opportunities to attend
CPD meeting in cluster. Re-arrangement of cluster might be
considered, if teachers have to take long trip to other school.
・ Procurement of bicycles can be considered as a cost-
effective way to assist teachers to move in cluster.
・ Proper plan for monitoring by provincial and district officers
should be made.
・ Capacity needs to be strengthened at lower levels, especially
Zonal Heads , so that the reports periodically generated by
the Zones are authentic.
・ Strengthen communication system
・ Strengthen Zone centre.
Paradigm shift on Problem analysis:

perceiving workshops A culture of perceiving workshops as a means of extra income
as a source of income had entered the minds of many people and teachers were not
an exception. Some donors and NGOs pay their participants
well and some of the teachers attend such workshops, thereby,
coming to CPD with such a mind set.
・ Make them understand and appreciate the benefits of
improving their professional development. They also need to
be made aware that they should not be paid for their personal
professional development and benefits are not always
financial.
36
5.2 Challenges related to Schools and Teachers
Anticipated challenges Possible explanation / Counter-measures

Negative attitude of Problem analysis:
some teachers Some teachers do not understand and appreciate the need of
attending CPD, because they could have been in service for a
long time; after graduating from teacher training institutions/
colleges, for others, teaching was not their first choice career,
while others just were lazy and uninterested
・ Enhance orientation and sensitization by school managers
on the needs of CPD as professionals.
・ Make efforts to try involving those teachers in a team of other
teachers.
・ Use successful model of their colleagues as peer educators.
・ Apply appropriate administrative measures at all levels.
Insufficient skills of Problem analysis:
teachers & facilitators In an effort to balance the allotment of facilitators, certain
for good lesson clusters may have under qualified facilitators.
critiquing and lack of Teachers are not used to critiquing lessons objectively because
confidence. they might confuse critiquing a lesson and criticizing the teacher.
・ Conduct training workshops for the facilitators as an on going
activity which enables them to continuously learn lesson
critiquing skills.
・ Orient teachers on the difference between lesson critiquing
and criticizing the teacher.
・ Encourage teachers to exchange comments and suggestions
for improving their lessons.
Inadequate materials Problem analysis:
and necessary There are not sufficient teaching and learning resources and
information for internet facilities at schools especially in rural areas. lack of
teachers to use as resourcefulness by teachers
tools to improve their Possible Counter-measure:
competence ・ Maximise the use of available resources, while developing
those which could be done within our/own means.
・ Make improvised teaching materials with locally available
resources.
・ Procure more materials with funds from income generating
activities within a school.
・ Network the Zone centres as a long term goal.
37
SAMPLE FORMATS & PROGRAMS FOR ACTIVITIES
SBCPD Monitoring & Evaluation Format 01
Implementation Monitoring Format (Operational Monitoring)
1. School Information:
District:
School:
Headteacher: (TS No.: )
Deputy Head: (TS No.: )
HOD/HOS/ZIC (if necessary): (TS No.: )
Number of Teachers (including seconded teachers):
2. Conduct of CPD (Lesson Study)

1) Lesson Study activities conducted in the present school term
Subject &
No. of Lesson
Topic of Facilitator of
Month Study Cycle Lesson Demonstrator
Demonstration Discussion
conducted
Lesson
1st Demo
2nd Demo
1st Demo
2nd Demo
1st Demo
2nd Demo
2) Commitment of School Managers and Overall Implementation of SBCPD in a school
3) Problems & Concerns encountered in conducting CPD and Measures taken by school
Problems & Concerns encountered Measures taken by school
39
3. Evaluation
1) Please rank the implementation of SBCPD (Lesson Study) in a school in correspondence with
the scale 1-5: (1: Poor, 2: Fair, 3: Good, 4: Very Good, 5: Excellent)
Poor Exce
# Item llent
1 2 3 4 5
1 How stable is the monthly CPD Implementation in the
school?
2 Are they following lesson study cycle under SBCPD?
3 How do you evaluate the planning and scheduling of

demo-lessons?
4 How do you evaluate the effectiveness of post-demo
discussions by the teachers?
5 How do you evaluate the ability of the facilitators
during CPD?
6 How is the cooperation & support for SBCPD by the
Headteacher?
7 How is the cooperation & support for SBCPD by
Deputy Head?
8 How is the impression of teachers participating in
SBCPD activities in the school in terms of its
effectiveness?
9 Has there been any change on teachers or in a
school after introducing lesson study under SBCPD?
10 Are there any CPD records and documents prepared
by school?
Total score: /50

2) Findings and
3) Measures to be taken in the school

Measures to be taken in the school Action by
Name of Headteacher:________________________ TS No:__________ Signature:____________
Inspected by:
Name: Name: Name:
Title: Title: Title:
Date: Date: Date:
40
Lesson Assessment Format (Technical Monitoring)
Lesson Information:
District: School:
Subject: Grade:
Topic:
Teacher (Demonstrator): (TS No.: )
1. Objectives & Its Attainment

Please check one of three categories (No: Unclear: Yes) on the following items
# Item No Unclear Yes
1 Are the lesson objectives clearly stated in the lesson plan?
2 Can the stated objectives be attained in a lesson?
3 Are the stated objectives measurable?
4 Were the lesson objectives told to the students during the lesson?
5 In a lesson, did the students find core contents or concept by
themselves?
6 Was there time for evaluating or confirming what the students had
learned?
7 Did most of the students attain lesson objectives?
2. Lesson Progression
Please check one of three categories (No: Unclear: Yes) on the following items.
1 Did the introductory part of the lesson motivate students well?
2 Did the teacher ask the students to hypothesize a solution before
instructing them to have an activity or experiment?
3 There was a presentation by students after an activity.
4 There was a discussion among students to find answers or better
solutions to the given tasks.
5 The teacher intended to confirm scientific concept or values in the
process of teaching.
6 Both the teacher and the students were able to conclude what they had
learned in a lesson.
3. Teaching Materials
Please check one of three categories (No: Unclear: Yes) on the following items.
1 Did the teacher use any kind of teaching materials apart from
blackboard and chalk?
2 Teaching materials were prepared properly before the lesson.
3 The teacher used improvised or locally available teaching materials in
a lesson.
4 The students were able to use or understand the prepared teaching
materials.
5 Teaching materials used in a lesson enhanced students’
understandings.
41
4. Questioning
The teacher’s questions in a lesson categorized by Bloom’s Taxonomy (Cognitive Process Dimension)
of Educational Objectives.
Understan
Remember Application Analysis Evaluation Creation Others Total
ding
Number of
Teacher’s
Questions
Percentage 100 %
5. Task allocation in the Lesson Plan

Number of Tasks Percentage
Teacher centered tasks
Learner or student centered tasks
Others (None of Above)
Total 100 %
6. Other Factors
1 The teacher managed time well during lesson implementation.
2 The teacher prepared for the lesson well.
3 The teacher managed the blackboard very well.
4 There were no problems in line with laboratory safety in a lesson.
5 In a lesson, students were guided on taking notes or records well.
7. Comments (if any)
Name of the Teacher: ____________________ TS No:____________ Signature_______________
Observed by:
Name:
Title:
Date:
42
QUESTIONNAIRE FOR PUPILS ON THE PERCEPTION OF THE LESSON
SCIENCE VERSION
Directions: We want to know what you think and feel about your science class. Please read each
sentence below carefully. Tell us if the sentence describes your science class. Tell us if the sentences
never, sometimes, often, or always happen. Please encircle your answer.
N= Never S = Sometimes O = Often A = Always
1. My teacher in this class gives examples that help me

understand lessons in science. N S O A
2. My teacher connects new scientific ideas to other science lessons. N S O A
3. My teacher tells us to memorize concepts and facts. N S O A
4. I like the laboratory activities in my science class. N S O A
5. My teacher wants us to concentrate on how to ask scientific questions,
collection of data, and discover new facts than on the memorization. N S O A
6. I feel free to express my scientific ideas in this class. N S O A
7. My teacher tries to find out if we understood our past lesson before
teaching us a new lesson. N S O A
8. My teacher tries to know if we were confident about what
we learn in our science class. N S O A
9. I understand the basic topics in my science class. N S O A
10. My teacher tells us that what she teaches us is true. N S O A
11. My teacher thinks that we know more about science than we really do. N S O A
12. I spend most of my time in this class copying what my
teacher writes on the board. N S O A
13. My teacher wants us to memorize and at the same time understand
the scientific facts and concepts . N S O A
14. I don’t understand the lessons my teacher teaches. N S O A
15. This class emphasizes what students ‘need to know,’ rather than what
they ‘should be able to do’ with the scientific concepts. N S O A
16. My teacher tells us what facts or concepts are important to learn. N S O A
17. I am not very good in science that is why I can’t understand my
science lessons. N S O A
18. My grades are a good sign of how much I have learned. N S O A
19. My grades in this class are a good sign of how hard I studied in science. N S O A
20. My teacher tries very hard to connect new ideas to past lessons N S O A
in science
21. The seatworks and laboratory activities in this class are boring. N S O A
22. My teacher supports competition for grades among students. N S O A
23. My teacher is able to slowly improve our understanding of scientific ideas. N S O A
24. My teacher has a hard time answering our questions in class. N S O A
25. My teacher wants us to join in classroom discussions. N S O A
26. My teacher connects scientific concepts to the ‘real world.’ N S O A
27. My teacher asks questions that help me understand my science lesson. N S O A
28. This class makes me like science very much. N S O A
29. My teacher talks about the effects of science to history and society. N S O A
30. My teacher would try to do everything just to be sure
that we understand the ideas taught in class. N S O A
31. My teacher is not very interested or excited to teach science. N S O A
43
32. My teacher is effective in teaching science. N S O A
33. This class made me more interested in science. N S O A
34. My grades are a good sign of the kind of work I do in my science class. N S O A
35. My teacher tries hard to make sure students understand the lesson. N S O A
36. It’s okay to ask my teacher for help if there are things I don’t understand. N S O A
37. My teacher wants me to think for myself. N S O A
38. My teacher thinks that students are responsible for their own learning N S O A
39. My science class builds a strong foundation for understanding N S O A
science at a higher level.
40. My science teacher likes us to make predictions and test our theories. N S O A
41. My teacher is clear and exact about what she expects students to learn. N S O A
42. My teacher gives more lectures than any other activities. N S O A
43. My teacher is not friendly. N S O A
44. I do not think that science is important in my life. N S O A
45. When I grow up, I will take a job that uses a lot of science. N S O A
46. Grades do not matter in this class because I am happy with what I am. N S O A
47. The laboratory activities my teacher gives us are lively and fun. N S O A
48. The way my teacher explains ideas in science is very clear. N S O A
49. My teacher lets us work in groups so that we can discover things together. N S O A
50. My teacher is more interested in finishing her lesson plan than helping
us learn the lesson. N S O A
51. My teacher doesn’t give comments on the results of our science activities. N S O A
52. Getting high grades in this class depends more on being born intelligent
than studying hard. N S O A
53. This class is boring. N S O A
54. I am still excited about learning more about science. N S O A
55. Science has nothing to do with my life. N S O A
56. My teacher lets us do scientific research projects. N S O A
57. My teacher checks and marks my exercises and homework. N S O A
58. My teacher comes for lessons on time. N S O A
59. My teacher makes us fear science. N S O A
60. My teacher uses experiments during our science lessons. N S O A
Age: ___ Sex: Male Female
Subject:___________________________ Grade and Class:_____________
44
QUESTIONNAIRE ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF SBCPD
FOR TEACHERS
The items below describe the matters related to the implementation of lesson study activities under
School-Based CPD program. Please read each item carefully and decide whether you agree or
disagree with each item. Encircle the number corresponding to your response using the following
scale: 1- (SD) Strongly Disagree; 2-(D) Disagree; 3-(NDA) Neither Disagree nor Agree; 4-(A)
Agree; 5-(SA) Strongly Agree.
Items SD D NDA A SA
CONTEXT
1. I rarely participate in workshops and trainings for teachers. 1 2 3 4 5
2. I think teachers have to continue learning, even after we leave college. 1 2 3 4 5
3. I need more skills and updated information on teaching. 1 2 3 4 5
4. It’s good that lesson study activities have been introduced in our school 1 2 3 4 5
under SBCPD program.
5. SBCPD program .aims to improve knowledge & skills of teachers 1 2 3 4 5
through lessons study as school CPD. I think this objective is
appropriate to the teachers.
INPUT
6. Our school has an activity plan for SBCPD activities including lesson 1 2 3 4 5
demonstrations.
7. The SBCPD facilitator assigned to my school or zone is doing good 1 2 3 4 5
job.
8. I was given an opportunity to participate in the CPD meetings 1 2 3 4 5
conducted by the SBCPD facilitator.
9. I have adequate apparatus/equipment for teaching. 1 2 3 4 5
10. I was oriented by facilitator / school managers on how to conduct 1 2 3 4 5
lesson study at school.
PROCESS
11. I appreciate that the SBCPD activities have been introduced at school 1 2 3 4 5
level.
12. Our school head and deputy head are supportive to lesson study 1 2 3 4 5
activities of teachers.
13. I always get new idea or skill from lesson study activities at school. 1 2 3 4 5
14. We are following 8 steps of lesson study activities at school. 1 2 3 4 5
15. Our school head and deputy give us useful comments and suggestions 1 2 3 4 5
for improvement of teaching.
PRODUCT
16. I became confident in teaching through activities under SBCPD 1 2 3 4 5
program.
17. I now spend more time for preparing my lessons. 1 2 3 4 5
18. I feel that the team work of our teachers was strengthened through this 1 2 3 4 5
program.
19. I wish that lesson study activities would be continued next year. 1 2 3 4 5
20. I believe that the framework of SBCPD program can work if taken to 1 2 3 4 5
other schools and provinces.
Thank you very much for your kind cooperation!!
45
QUESTIONNAIRE ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF SBCPD
FOR SCHOOL MANAGERS (HEAD & DEPUTY HEAD TEACHER)
The items below describe the matters related to the implementation of lesson study activities under
SBCPD program. Please read each item carefully and decide whether you agree or disagree with
each item. Encircle the number corresponding to your response using the following scale: 1- (SD)
Strongly Disagree; 2-(D) Disagree; 3-(NDA) Neither Disagree nor Agree; 4-(A) Agree; 5-(SA)
Strongly Agree.
Items SD D NDA A SA
CONTEXT
1. Teachers in my school reraly participate in workshops and trainings for the 1 2 3 4 5
improvement of teaching.
2. Teachers have to continue learning, even after they become teachers. 1 2 3 4 5
3. Teachers in my school need more skills and updated information on teaching. 1 2 3 4 5
4. It’s good that lesson study activities have been introduced in our school under 1 2 3 4 5
SBCPD program.
5. SBCPD program .aims to improve knowledge & skills of teachers through 1 2 3 4 5
lessons study as school CPD. I think this objective is appropriate to the
teachers.
INPUT
6. Our school has an activity plan for SBCPD activities including lesson 1 2 3 4 5
demonstrations.
7. The SBCPD facilitator assigned to my school or zone is doing good job. 1 2 3 4 5
8. In our school, an opportunity has been provided for teachers to participate in 1 2 3 4 5
the CPD meetings conducted by the SBCPD facilitator.
9. We have adequate apparatus/equipment for teaching. 1 2 3 4 5
10. We have conducted an orientation on how to conduct lesson study at school. 1 2 3 4 5
PROCESS
11. I appreciate that SBCPD activities have been introduced at school level. 1 2 3 4 5
12. Teachers in my school are cooperative in conducting lesson study activities. 1 2 3 4 5
13. Teachers in my school always get new idea or skill from lesson study 1 2 3 4 5
activities at school.
14. We are following 8 steps of lesson study activities at school. 1 2 3 4 5
15. In lesson study activities, I give comments and suggestions for improvement 1 2 3 4 5
of teaching to the teachers.
PRODUCT
16. Teachers in my school became confident in teaching through activities under 1 2 3 4 5
SBCPD program.
17. Teachers in my school now spend more time for preparing their lessons. 1 2 3 4 5
18. I feel that the team work of our teachers was strengthened through this 1 2 3 4 5
program.
19. I wish that lesson study activities would be continued next year. 1 2 3 4 5
20. I believe that the framework of SBCPD program can work if taken to other 1 2 3 4 5
schools and provinces.
Thank you very much for your kind cooperation!!
46
Sample for analyzing results on Baseline and End-line survey
1. Result on the Observation of Science Lessons (by Format 02)
Analysis Factors 2006 (N=44) 2007 (N=29)

F1: Objective & its attainment 1.31 1.67
F2: Lesson Progression (Processing) 1.11 1.60
F3: Use of Teaching Materials 1.46 1.79
F4: Cognitive Level of Teacher’s Questions 0.61 0.58
F5: Task allocated to learners in Lesson Plan 0.40 1.16
F6: Other factors (Time management, Board, 1.41 1.59
work, Lab. Safety etc.)
Comparison between Baseline and Endline on the Observation of Science Lessons
Comparison between Baseline and Endline Result

on the Observation of Science Lessons
(Grade 8 - 12)
F1
2.00
1.50
2006 2007
F6 1.00 F2
F1: Objective & its attainment
0.50 F2: Lesson Progression (Processing)
F3: Use of Teaching Materials
0.00
F4: Cognitive level of teacher's question
F5: Task allocated to Learners in lesson plan
F6: Other factors (Time Mgt., Boardwork,
F5 F3 laboratory safety etc.)
F4
47
Sample for analyzing results on Baseline and End-line survey
2. Result on the Perception of Pupils on Science Lessons (by Format 03)
Result on the Perception of Pupils on Science Lessons

Analysis Factors 2006 (N=2,029) 2007 (N=1,561)
F1:Teaching for Understanding 2.91 2.78
F2:Positive affect in classroom 2.73 2.67
F3:Less indifference & irrelevance matters 2.10 2.09
F4:Self-efficacy & less negative motivation of
2.10 2.08
students
F5:Appropriate assessment of learning 2.92 2.88
F6:Learning scientific facts & concepts 2.48 2.48
F7:Various learning activities 2.28 2.26
F8:Independent learning 2.41 2.44
Comparison between Baseline and End-line on the Perception of Pupils on Science Lessons
comparison between baseline and endline result

on the perception of pupils on science lessons
(Grade 9 & 12)
F1 2006 (N=2,029) 2007 (N=1,561)

4.00
F1: Teaching for Understanding
F8 3.00 F2 F2: Positive affect in classroom
F3: Less Indifference &
2.00 irrelevance matters
F4: Self-efficacy & less negative
motivation of students
F7 1.00 F3
F5: Appropriate assessment of
learning
F6: Learning scientific facts &
concept
F6 F4 F7: Various learning activities
F8: Independent learning
F5
48
Sample for analyzing CIPP components on the implementation of SBCPD
Result of Questionnaires to School managers and Teachers (by Format 04 & 05)
Result of Questionnaires to School Managers & Teachers
Managers (N=19) Teachers (N=121)
5.00
4.50
4.00
Extent of Agreem
3.50
3.00
2.50
2.00
1.50
1.00
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
Q5
Q6
Q7
Q8
Q9
Q10
Q11
Q12
Q13
Q14
Q15
Q16
Q17
Q18
Q19
Q20
Analysis by CIPP on the Implementation of the Program
Implementors' Evaluation of the Programon CIPP
Managers Teachers
Extent of Agreement
1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00
CONTEXT
INPUT
PROCESS
PRODUCT
Overall
49
School-Based CPD Termly School Implementation Report
Year: Term:
1. Conduct of Lesson Study and Major Outputs
Name of Teacher Number of Teachers
Month Subject/Topic Name of Facilitator Major outputs & learning
demonstrated participated
1st demo
Revised demo
1st demo
Revised demo
1st demo
Revised demo
2. Problems encountered and measures taken by the school

Problems/Concerns encountered in lesson study Measures taken by the school/teachers
Submitted by: Name of School: , District: Date prepared:

Name of Headteacher:
*Please attach your own report on lesson study with lesson plans used by the teachers.
50
Sample Program for the 1st Stakeholders’ Workshop:
School-Based CPD 1st STAKEHOLDERS’ WORKSHOP
FOR THE DISTRICTS OF (Name of Districts)

ON (Date)
PROGRAM
DAY 1 – Plenary
Time Program Facilitator
8:00 – 9:00 Registration of Participants
9:00 – 10:00 Opening Program
- Prayer
- Welcome Remarks Headteacher
- Introduction of Participants, Facilitators &
Project Officials
- Official Opening PEO
- Confirmation on Workshop Schedule SESO-NS
- Other Announcement
10:00 – 11:00 Plenary Session; Program Scope SEO-TED/SESO-NS
- Outline of School-based CPD program
11:00 – 11:15 Short Break
11:15 – 13:00 - Introduction of Experience in Other SESO-NS
Province / Country SESO-Math.
Video Show
13:00 – 14:00 Lunch Break
14:00 – 16:00 Plenary; Continuation
- Framework of SBCPD
- Implementation Strategy
- Open Discussion SEO-TED/SESO-NS
16:00 – 17:00 Group Work; District Planning
- Planning
- Feedback
DAY 2: For Facilitators, Deputy Heads, DRCCs, DESOs

8:30 – 11:00 Session on Lesson Study and Facilitation
- Review of Lesson Study Cycle PRCCs
- Adult Learning and Facilitation SESO-Math.
11:15 – 13:00 - Effective Skills on Facilitation (including SESO-Math.
Group Work)
14:00 – 17:00 Preparation of Demonstration on Facilitation SBCPD Facilitators
- Group meeting and Preparation of Lesson w/ SESO-NS, SESO-
Plans for Day 3 Math.
51
DAY 2: For Headteachers, DEBS
8:30 – 11:00 Session on Foundation of School Management PEO, PESO, SPO
- Group Discussion on School Management
- Factors affecting Effective School
Management
11:15 – 13:00 - Factors affecting Effective School PEO. PESO, SPO
Management
14:00 – 17:00 - Sharing of Experience on School SESO-PS
Management
DAY 3: For Facilitators, Deputy Heads, DRCCs, DESOs

8:30 – 11:00 Demonstration of Facilitation SBCPD Facilitators
- Demonstration Lesson at Kabwe High w/ SESO-NS, SESO-
School Math.
11:15 – 13:00 - Post-discussion as a Practice of Facilitation SBCPD Facilitators
- Critiquing of Facilitation Effective Skills on w/ SESO-NS, SESO-
Facilitation Math.
14:00 – 15:00 Closing Program (Plenary)
- Prayer
- Closing Remarks DEBS
- Output of Workshop SEO-TED
- Official Closing PEO
- Announcement
DAY 3: For Headteachers, DEBS

8:30 – 11:00 Session on Management of School-based CPD SEO-TED
- Group Discussion on the concerns on the
current CPDs at schools
- Feedback
11:15 – 13:00 - Input on Effective Management of School SEO-TED
CPD
14:00 – 15:00 Closing Program (Plenary)
- Prayer
- Closing Remarks DEBS
- Output of Workshop SEO-TED
- Official Closing PEO
- Announcement
52
Sample Program for 2nd – 6th Stakeholders’ Workshop:
School-Based CPD 3rd STAKEHOLDERS’ WORKSHOP
FOR DISTRICTS OF MKUSHI, KAPIRI MPOSHI & CHIBOMBO

ON 18-19 DECEMBER 2006
PROGRAM
DAY 0 (17th December 2006)--- Arrival of Participants from 16:00hrs
DAY 1 (18th December 2006)

Time Program
8:00 – 9:00 Registration of Participants (DRCCs)
9:00 – 9:45 Opening Program (Chaired by DEBS Mkushi)
- Prayer
- Welcome Remarks --- Head of Host school
- Introduction of Participants, Facilitators & Project Officials --- EO-TED
- Official Opening ---A/PEO
- Announcement ---SESO-NS
9:45 – 10:30 Plenary session:

Objectives & Expectations of workshop & Orientation of workshop program ---
SESO-NS
10:30 – 11:00 Break

11:00 – 13:00 Parallel Sessions for each Group of District
Mkushi District Kapiri Mposhi District Chibombo District
(Facilitated by SESO- (Facilitated by SEO-TED, (Facilitated by, EO-TED,
Math, PRCCs, Serenje) PRCCs, Kabwe) SESO-NS, SPO)
- Sharing of experiences - Sharing of experiences - Sharing of experiences
in the last term in the last term in the last term
14:30 – 16:30 (Continuation) (Continuation) (Continuation)
- Evaluation & - Evaluation & - Evaluation &
Solutions for Solutions for Solutions for
improvement improvement improvement
- Rebuilding/Making of - Rebuilding/Making of - Rebuilding/Making of
District Plan for the District Plan for the District Plan for the
next term next term next term
16:30 – 17:30 Plenary (Chaired by DEBS Kapiri Mposhi):

-Sharing of Major Experiences & Solutions from District discussions (SEO-TED)
-Grouping for Day 2 (By SESO-NS, SESO-Math.)
53
DAY 2 (19th December 2006) For Facilitators, Deputy Heads, DRCCs, DESOs
Time Program
Group A Group B Group C
8:30 – 10:30 Student-Centered Learning Points for observing Effective questioning skills
based on ASEI/PDSI lessons in science lesson
approach (By PRCCs from Kabwe) (By SESO-NS)
(By SESO-Math, PRCCs
from Serenje)
10:30 – 11:00 Break
11:00 – 13:00 Points for observing Effective questioning skills Student-Centered Learning
lessons in science lesson based on ASEI/PDSI
(By PRCCs from Kabwe) (By SESO-NS) approach
from Serenje)
14:30 – 16:30 Effective questioning skills Student-Centered Learning Points for observing
in science lesson based on ASEI/PDSI lessons
(By SESO-NS) approach (By PRCCs from Kabwe)
from Serenje)
16:30 – 17:00 Plenary:
-Collection of School Reports and Lesson Plans used in the last term (By EO-TED)
-Closing Program (Chaired by DEBS Chibombo)
DAY 2 (19th December 2006) For Headteachers, DEBS

Time Program
Group A Group B Group C
8:30 – 10:30 Sharing of Experience on Effective School Effective Management for
School-based CPD (Lesson Management School-based CPD
Study) in the 3rd term (By PESO, Representatives (By SEO-TED, EO-TED)
(By A/SPO, SESO-ODL) of DEBS & Headteachers)
10:30 – 11:00 Break

11:00 – 13:00 Effective School Effective Management for Sharing of Experience on
Management School-based CPD School-based CPD (Lesson
(By PESO, Representatives (By SEO-TED, EO-TED) Study) in the 3rd term
of DEBS & Headteachers) (By A/SPO, SESO-ODL)

14:30 – 16:30 Effective Management for Sharing of Experience on Effective School
School-based CPD School-based CPD (Lesson Management
(By SEO-TED, EO-TED) Study) in the 3rd term (By PESO, Representatives
(By A/SPO, SESO-ODL) of DEBS & Headteachers)
16:30 – 17:00 Plenary:

-Collection of School Reports and Lesson Plans used in the last term (By EO-TED)
-Closing Program (Chaired by DEBS Chibombo)
54
Sample Program for Facilitators’ Workshop:
PROGRAM FOR 1ST SBCPD (SMASTE-CPD) FACILITATORS WORKSHOP
VENUE: KABWE HIGH SCHOOL

DATE: 14TH TO 15TH DECEMBER 2006
DAY 1: Thursday 14/12/06

Time Activity Chair/Facilitator
8:30 – 9:00 Registration
9:00 – 10:00 Opening Program
- Prayer
- Welcoming Remarks Headteacher, Kabwe HS
- Introduction of Participants and Facilitators EO-TED
- Official Opening A/PEO
- Objectives of workshop and confirmation of program SESO(NS)
10:30 – 13:00 Plenary Session 1 Chair: DESO, Serenje
- Presentation of brief reports from old facilitators Facilitator: SEO-TED
- Sharing experiences and discussion on the concerns SCHS, Serenje

- Grouping for the afternoon session
14:30 – 17:00 Group Session 1
Practical Skills and Information for each subject Organizer: JTC members
(Physics, Chemistry/Biology, Mathematics and Facilitator: JOCVs
Environmental science
DAY 2: Friday 15/12/06

Time Activity Chair/Facilitator
9:00 – 11:00 Group Session 2 Organizer: JTC members
Practical Skills and Information for each subject Facilitator: JOCVs
11:30 – 13:00 Group Session 3 Organizer: JTC members
Practical Skills and Information for each subject Facilitator: JOCVs
14:30 – 16:00 Plenary Session 2
- Zoning of Facilitators JTC members for each
- Making of district work plans district
- Resolutions/Suggestion
- Way forward
16:00 – 17:00 Closing Program
- Summarization of Outputs Participants
- Official Closing A/PEO
- Announcement
Facilitator for Group Session

Subject Facilitator Organizer
Mathematics 2 JOCV members SESO (Math), SPO
Physics 2 JOCV members SEO-TED, SCBS(Serenje)
Chemistry/Biology 2 JOCV members SCHS(Serenje), SCHS(Kabwe)
Environmental Science 3 JOCV members EO-TED
55
Sample of District Implementation Plan
Kapiri Mposhi District
SMASTE-CPD District Framework and Implementation Plan
SMASTE District Committee Members:
1. MR. B. F. CHISAKA DEBS DEBS OFFICE

2. MR. HANDEMA S. DESO DEBS OFFICE
3. SR. ZIMBA A. HEADTEACHER MPUNDE HIGH SCHOOL
4. BRO. BUSHILYA HEADTEACHER ST. PAULS HIGH SCHOOL
5. MR. NONDO F. HEADTEACHER MUKONCHI HIGH SCHOOL
6. MR. MWELA I. C. HEADTEACHER PALAMEDES BASIC SCHOOL
7. MRS. MIYOBA HEADTEACHER CHIBWE BASIC SCHOOL
8. MR. HIMOONGA HEADTEACHER CHILUMBA BASIC SCHOOL
9. MR. MUTAMBO HEADTEACHER LUKOMBA BASIC SCHOOL
10. MRS. KASONDE E. K. FACILITATOR LUKANDA BASIC SCHOOL
11. MR. KANDINDA B. FACILITATOR CHAMBULUMINA BASIC SCHOOL
12. MR. MUSONDA R. FACILITATOR PALAMEDES BASIC SCHOOL
13. MR. MANDE J. FACILITATOR MUKONCHI HIGH SCHOOL
14. MR. SINYIBULULA FACILITATOR MPUNDE HIGH SCHOOL
15. MR. SAKALA DRCC DEBS OFFICE
Allocation of Zones/Schools for SMASTE-CPD:
Cluster Zones Schools Assigned Facilitator

A Iwonde/Mukubwe 1. Lwamala 2. Ngabwe 3. Mumbachala 4. Iwonde To be identified (2
5. Chilwa Island 6. Mukubwe 7. Mutende people)
8. Shamputa 9. Mwangule
B Mpunde 1. Chipeso 2. Kakutwe 3. Chimwala 4. Lwachele Sinyibulula J
5. St. Joseph 6. Fibale 7. Mpunde 8. Kachika Kakwama
C Chilumba 1. Kato 2.Shamabansa 3. Kapandwe 4. Muchinga Hachofwe C
5. Kantupu 6. Kaswende 7. Meembe 8. Nansenga Habeenzu
9. Chilumba
D Lanshimba/Sungula 1. Kalenda 2. Chimbo 3. Kabwale 4. Sungula Taulo J
5. Muteteshi 6. Lwanshimba 7. Nchembwe Siaswana
8. Imansa 9. Mufukushi 10. Mukabe Kasongo
E Kapiri 1. Kaunga 2. Kamboshya 3. Chisamba 4. Matiyo Kasonde E
5. Lukanda 6. Hill-top 7. Mulonga 8. Palamedes Chicheleko C.
9. Kapiri 10. Chisengamanga Musonda R
Mbafuta
F Mafwasa/Nkole 1. Chibile 2. Mafwasa 3. Kapisu 4. Chambulumina Kandinda B
5. Renato 6. Mobe 7. Rubera 8. Fibawe 9. Nkole Phiri M
Chifunda M
G Lukomba/Lunchu 1. Kaundu 2. Mubalashi 3. Matuka 4. Chakomo Kafumo B
5. Fitalo 6. Fikola 7. Lukomba 8. George Ndashe Nkhoma J
9. Lunchu 10. Yongwe 11. Kabonga 12. Kabalenga Nsonde P
13. Kapila 14. Kanendele
H Mukonchi 1. Kanyemu 2. Chamakamba 3. Mubofwe Mande J
4. Kamisenga 5. Kamulobwe 6. Makafu Mendulo P
7. Mukonchi High 8. Mukonchi Basic
I Chibwe 1. Muchinga 2. Kakwalesa 3. Kalundu 4. Ntasa Musonda I
5. Chibwe 6. St. Pauls 7. Mondake 8. St Pauls Basic Chiboshi C
J Likumbi 1. Chishinka 2. Manyinya 3. Lunsemfwa 4. Kamwanya Bwalya AM
5. Likumbi 6. Kabanga 7. Kampumba 8. Mulenge Hachibola
9. Ilinga 10. Mulungushi 11. Katelemuna
56
Kapiri Mposhi District
SMASTE-CPD District Implementation Programme
COST /
S/N DATE ACTIVITY OBJECTIVE TARGET VENUE DURATION IMPLEMENTOR RESOURCES
SOURCE
1 05/05/06 District Committee To strategize district District Kapiri 3 hrs DESO Paper 25 000
Meeting implementation plan Committee DRCC (from
members Sector/GRZ)
2 09/05/06 Meeting of To prepare for the All Facilitators in District 1 day DESO Paper 25 000
Facilitators sensitization the district Resource DRCC Flip chart 30 000
meetings Center Markers 50 000
(from
sector/GRZ)
3 11/05/06 Sensitization To sensitize school All heads & Kaipiri 1 day DESO Flip chart 30 000
Meeting on managers in zones deputy heads in 2 Facilitators Markers 90 000
SMASTE-CPD of; the zones of; (Kasonde, Musonda) Paper 25 000
Kapiri Kapiri DRCC Fuel 200 000
Mafwasa Mafwasa Allowances 200 000
Sungula Sungula bostic 20 000
Luanshimba Luanshimba (from
sector/GRZ)
4 12/05/06 Sensitization To sensitize school All heads & Lukomba 1 day DESO Flip chart 30 000
Meeting on managers in zones deputy heads in Zone R/C 2 Facilitators Markers 90 000
SMASTE-CPD of; the zones of; (Kandinda, Mande) Paper 25 000
Lukomba Lukomba DRCC Fuel 200 000
Lunchu Lunchu Allowances 200 000
bostic 20 000
(from
sector/GRZ)
5 19/05/06 Sensitization To sensitize school All heads & Mpunde 1 day DESO Flip chart 30 000
Meeting on managers in zones deputy heads in High School 3 Facilitators Markers 90 000
SMASTE-CPD of; the zones of; (Kasonde, Musonda, Paper 25 000
Mpunde Mpunde Sinyibulula) Fuel 200 000
Iwonde Iwonde Allowances 200 000
Chilumba Chilumba bostic 20 000
Mukubwe Mukubwe (from
sector/GRZ)
(below omission)
57
Sample School Implementation Plan:
MUSOPELO UPPER BASIC SCHOOL SPRINT/SMASTE-CPD WORKPLAN --- TERM-1, 2007
DATE ACTIVITY/TOPIC FACILITATOR CHAIRPERSON TARGET

February
1/2/07 HIM B. Mpande B. Mpande
All teachers
“Planning School Activities in the Term” (D/H teacher) (D/H teacher)
15/2/07 TGM
SMASTE Orientation
B. Mpande
(Review of Lesson Study Cycle and Activities, M. Mwando All teachers
(D/H teacher)
Identification of Problems and Topics difficult to teach in the
term)
21/2/07 TGM All teachers
Planning of Demo Lessons M. Mwando D. Bulaya (Lesson plan drafted
by G9 Trs.)
22/2/07 TGM
Grade 9 SMASTE Mathematics Demo Lesson N. Nyirongo S. Chibale All teachers
Discussion after the lesson
28/2/07 HIM M. B. Goma
I.R.I Workshop (H/teacher) O. Musonda All teachers
D. Bulaya
March
1/3/07 TGM
Grade 9 SMASTE Mathematics Revised Lesson N. Nyirongo B. Kayala All teachers
7/3/07 HIM
O. Musonda D. Bulaya All teachers
“Gender across the curriculum”
8/3/07 TGM All teachers
Grade 7 SMASTE Mathematics Demo Lesson S. Chibale O. Musonda (Lesson plan drafted
Discussion after the lesson by G7 Trs.)
14/3/07 TGM
Grade 7 SMASTE Mathematics Revised Lesson B. Kayala A. C. Masaninga All teachers
21/3/07 HIM
“Review of Mathematics Lessons in the term” A. C. Masaninga M. Mwando All teachers
(Compilation of lesson plans and Minutes of meetings)
(below omission)
58
Sample Lesson Plan (Science) for 1st Demonstration Lesson:
SCHOOL: Kalilwe Basic School DATE: 27/10/2006

SUBJECT: Environmental Science
TOPIC: Current, Potential Difference, Resistance and Electric Power
SUBTOPIC: Electrical Appliances and Fuses
CLASS: 9E
RATIONALE: Electrical appliances have made our lives easier because we are able to do things quickly
with less effort. However, as when it comes to use these appliances, we must bear in mind that the rate at
which power is consumed is different for different appliances. However, we calculate this rate and help
conserve power by using the appliances correctly.
OBJECTIVES: By the end of the lesson PSBAT:

i) Give examples of electrical appliances
ii) Using the formula for calculating power, voltage and current.
PREREQUISITE SKILLS AND KNOWLEDGE: Pupils know that electrical appliances use electricity.
REFERENCE BOOKS: Environmental Science pupils’ book 9
TEACHING AND LEARNING MATERIALS/RESOURCES: Electrical appliances such as bulbs,
pressing iron etc.
LESSON PROCESS:
STAGE TEACHING/LEARNING ACTIVITIES LEARNING POINTS
INTRODUCTION Ask questions as some sort of revision,
1. What instrument is used to measure - Ammeter
electric current?
2. What are the units for this electric - Ampere (amps)
current?
DEVELOPMENT STEP 1
Tell pupils that the current drawn by an appliance - Power is the rate at which
is called power rating or wattage. current is drawn by an
appliance
The rate at which current if used by an appliance. - Power is the rate at which
electric current is used up.
- Power is measured in watts
(wattage) W.
What is an electrical appliance? - An electrical appliance is a
device that uses electricity.
Power is indicated on the electrical appliance.
Give formula for Power.
STEP 2
Group work
Distribute some electrical appliances to the groups
and let pupils to identify rating on each appliance.
STEP 3
Ask pupils to present their findings.
CONCLUSION Exercise.
1. What is the unit of power? - Watt.
2. A current of 6A flows through a bulb - P=1440 watts
connected to a 240V supply. Calculate its
power.
3. An electric motor is rated 36W, 12V. - I=3A
What current does the appliance use?
Sample Lesson Plan (Science) for Revised Lesson (2nd Demonstration Lesson):
SCHOOL: Kalilwe Basic School DATE: 01/11/2006

SUBJECT: Environmental Science DURATION: 1 hr 20 mins
TOPIC: Current, Potential Difference, Resistance and Electric Power
SUBTOPIC: Electrical Appliances and Fuses
CLASS: 9D No. OF PUPILS: 50
RATIONALE:
1) In this lesson, pupils are expected to understand the meanings of electrical ratings labelled on electrical
appliances and to use formula for calculating power to get the size of electric current which is used by the
appliances.
2) Electrical appliances have made our lives easier because we are able to do things quickly with less
effort. However, as when it comes to use these appliances, we must bear in mind that the rate at which
power is consumed is different for different appliances. This would also help conserve power by using the
appliances correctly.
3) Based on discovery approach, in this lesson, sample electrical appliances are shown to the pupils to
find ratings labelled on them. After this activity, pupils are asked to calculate the size of electric current
used by that appliance.
4) This lesson is the 6th period of 11 lessons which covers the topic.
OBJECTIVES: By the end of the lesson PSBAT:

i) Give examples of electrical appliances
ii) Identify the ratings labelled on each electrical appliance
iii) Calculate current used by each electrical appliance in reference to the ratings labelled on
it.
PREREQUISITE SKILLS AND KNOWLEDGE: Pupils know that electrical appliances use electricity.
REFERENCE BOOKS: Environmental Science pupils’ book 9
TEACHING AND LEARNING MATERIALS/RESOURCES: Electrical appliances such as electrical

jag, pressing iron, radio etc.
LESSON PROCESS:
STAGE TEACHING/LEARNING ACTIVITIES LEARNING POINTS
INTRODUCTION Ask questions as some sort of revision,
(5 min.) 1 What instrument is used to measure - Ammeter
electric current?
2 What are the units for the followings?
- Electric current - Ampere (amps)
- Voltage - Volts
- Resistance - Ohms
- Power - Watts
DEVELOPMENT STEP 1
(60 min.) Teacher shows electrical (vacuum) cleaner to the
pupils and ask the following questions to find out
what pupils know about power.
“What is this number showing 1200W?”
Pupils tell 1200W means strength of the

cleaner.
Pupils tell it’s a power of the cleaner.
Teacher confirms if all the electrical appliances - Power is the rate at which
have this W. current is drawn by an
appliance
Pupils tell all the appliances have it, frequently - Power is the rate at which
60
labelled. electric current is used up.
Teacher introduces formula for power. - Power is measured in watts

(wattage) W.
- An electrical appliance is a
device that uses electricity.
STEP 2
Teacher distributes pupils into 6 groups and gives
some electrical appliances to each group.
Teacher will ask;

“How can we find the size of electric current
which is used by each appliance?”
Pupils identify labelled power on the - Let pupils to discover that

appliances. electric current can be found
Pupils discuss how to calculate the current as below.
using formula for power. I=P/V
Some pupils find current can be found with
dividing power by voltage.
STEP 3
Pupils are requested to present their findings.
Teacher lets pupil to explain what they have

discovered through activity.
Teacher confirms if the calculations are collect.
Teacher asks;
“What we should do to avoid large current flow in
our houses?”
Pupils answer we should not use appliances

with large power in the same time.
CONCLUSION Pupils are asked to have exercise.

(15 min.) 1. What is the unit of power? - Watt.
2. A current of 6A flows through a bulb - P=1440 watts
connected to a 240V supply. Calculate its
power.
3. An electric motor is rated 36W, 12V. - I=3A
What current does the appliance use?
4. Write the reason why it is not Because it causes big current
recommended for us to use appliances which break the circuit in the
with big power in the same time? house.
Evaluation:
1) Were the pupils able to give samples of electric appliances?
2) Were the pupils able to identify the ratings labelled on the appliances?
3) Were the pupils able to find the process of calculating electric current using the ratings on the
appliances and get correct answers?
61
References:
Audette, Andre (2004), Lesson Study: Teachers Learning Together, New England Reading
Association Journal; Vol. 40 (2), p.31-34.
Chiew C. M., Lim C. S. (2005), Using lesson study process to enhance mathematics teacher’s
content knowledge and teaching practices, Paper in COSMED conference 2005, SEAMEO,
Manila, Philippines
Department of Education, Philippines (2004), School-Based Training Program Implementation
Manual, Department of Education, Manila, Philippines
JICA (2006), Teachers Learning Together: Japanese Teacher Training System and Lesson Studies,
JICA-Net Multimedia-based learning Materials in FY2006, Japan
Ministry of Education (1996), Educating our future - Policy paper of Zambian education, Ministry of
Education, Lusaka, Zambia
Ministry of Education (1998), School Programme of In-Service for the Term (SPRINT): A Manual
for In-service Provision, The Teacher Education Department, Ministry of Education, Lusaka,
Zambia
Ministry of Education (2002), Baseline survey on science and mathematics education in Zambia,
Ministry of Education & ISTC, Lusaka, Zambia
Ministry of Education (2004), Guidelines on High School SPRINT and CPD, Teacher Education
and Specialized Services, Ministry of Education, Lusaka, Zambia
Stigler, J. W., Hiebert, J. (1999), The teaching gap: Best ideas from the world’s teachers for
improving education in the classroom, New York, The Free Press
Stufflebeam, Daniel L. (1983), The CIPP model for program evaluation, Evaluation models:
viewpoints on educational and human services evaluation
Stufflebeam, Daniel L. (2002), CIPP Evaluation Model Checklist: A tool for applying the fifth
installment of the CIPP model to assess long-term enterprises, Web-material at
www.wmich.edu/evalctr/checklists
UNESCO (1997), Teachers as lifelong learners: Case studies of innovative in-service teacher
training programmes in the E-9 countries, UNESCO, Paris
VVOB (Flemish Association for Development Co-operation and Technical Assistance) (2006), An
Inservice Coordinators’ Guide for School-Based Continuing Professional Development in
Basic Schools: Part I & II, VVOB, Zambia
62
(MEMO)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
63
(MEMO)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
64

Roles of Stakeholders

Uploaded by

Document Informationclick to expand document information

Copyright:

Available Formats

Roles of Stakeholders

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Roles of Stakeholders

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

School Programme of In-service for the Term

PLANNING LESSON DEMONSTRATION

REVISED DEMONSTRATION DISCUSSION

This booklet was prepared by:

To you all as key and strategic stakeholders, we say thank you.

Ruth M. Mubanga (Mrs)

School-Based Continuing Professional Development (SBCPD) of teachers / educators has been

Lilian E.L Kapulu (Mrs)

Acknowledgement / Preface / Acronyms

PART I: Implementation Guidelines

1. What is School-Based CPD through Lesson Study -------------------------------------- 1

2. Detailed Framework of the Program -------------------------------------------------------- 7

3. Monitoring and Evaluation --------------------------------------------------------------------- 21

PART II: Useful Information Based on Experience

1. Procedure for introducing the Program ---------------------------------------------------- 27

2. Consideration for Geographical Differences on Implementation -------------------- 30

3. Clustering and Allotment of Facilitators --------------------------------------------------- 31

4. Levels of Organization and Arrangement of Activities --------------------------------- 31

5. Anticipated Challenges and Possible Counter-measures ----------------------------- 35

PART III: Sample Formats and Programs for Activities

1. Monitoring & Evaluation Format 01 – Implementation Monitoring Format --------- 39

8. Termly School Implementation Report --------------------------------------------------- 50

The 1966 ILO/UNESCO Recommendation concerning the Status of Teachers

1. What is School–Based CPD through Lesson Study

Like other professionals, teachers have a responsibility, to themselves and to their

“Educating Our Future”, a policy document of the Ministry of Education suggests

• Programs which are demand driven, responding to identified needs

This program has been implemented in Central Province since 2006 as

1.1 Framework of School–Based CPD through Lesson Study

Fortunately, we have SPRINT-CPD as a system that enables all the teachers to

1.2 Venue for Learning

1.3 Learning Module - “Lesson Study”

Lesson study is a problem solving process of teacher professional development

8. Reflections Compiled and Shared

1. Defining Problems or Challenge

7. Discuss the Lesson & Reflect again

6. Teach the Revised Lesson 3. Implementing Demo-Lesson

5. Revise the Lesson 4. Discuss Lesson & Reflect on its Effect

Figure 1: The Cycle of Lesson Study at School

1. Defining the Problem or Challenge

As earlier stated Lesson Study is an approach which uses problem solving

2. Collaboratively Planning the Lesson

3. Implementing Demo-Lesson (Seeing a Lesson Plan being implemented in a

Using agreed criteria, a teacher is selected to implement the lesson in a

based on specific items of concern. At this stage education standard

4. Discuss the Lesson and Reflect on its Effects

5. Revise the Lesson

6. Teach the Revised Lesson

7. Discuss the Lesson and Reflect on its Effect again

It is very important that another discussion on the lesson could be done so

8. Reflection Compiled and Shared (Teachers share reflection on new version

At this moment progress report by respective stakeholders such as

Assistance of Facilitators Support by Education Managers Support by College & PTAs

Effective School Management Commitment of Stakeholders Use of Existing Resources

Figure 2: Framework of School-Based CPD through Lesson Study

2. Detailed Framework of the Program

2.1 Basic Design of Core Activities

As stated in 1.1 School-Based CPD uses components in SPRINT as venues and