13 Drig-Drishya Viveka PDF
13 Drig-Drishya Viveka PDF
13 Drig-Drishya Viveka PDF
DRIG-DRISHYA VIVEKA
Reflections by
TEXT SWAMI GURUBHAKTANANDA
13
Sandeepany’s Vedanta Course
List of All the Course Texts in Chronological Sequence:
Text Text
TITLE OF TEXT TITLE OF TEXT
No. No.
1 Sadhana Panchakam 24 Hanuman Chalisa
2 Tattwa Bodha 25 Vakya Vritti
3 Atma Bodha 26 Advaita Makaranda
4 Bhaja Govindam 27 Kaivalya Upanishad
5 Manisha Panchakam 28 Bhagavad Geeta (Discourse -- )
6 Forgive Me 29 Mundaka Upanishad
7 Upadesha Sara 30 Amritabindu Upanishad
8 Prashna Upanishad 31 Mukunda Mala (Bhakti Text)
9 Dhanyashtakam 32 Tapovan Shatkam
10 Bodha Sara 33 The Mahavakyas, Panchadasi 5
11 Viveka Choodamani 34 Aitareya Upanishad
12 Jnana Sara 35 Narada Bhakti Sutras
13 Drig-Drishya Viveka 36 Taittiriya Upanishad
14 “Tat Twam Asi” – Chand Up 6 37 Jivan Sutrani (Tips for Happy Living)
15 Dhyana Swaroopam 38 Kena Upanishad
16 “Bhoomaiva Sukham” Chand Up 7 39 Aparoksha Anubhuti (Meditation)
17 Manah Shodhanam 40 108 Names of Pujya Gurudev
18 “Nataka Deepa” – Panchadasi 10 41 Mandukya Upanishad
19 Isavasya Upanishad 42 Dakshinamurty Ashtakam
20 Katha Upanishad 43 Shad Darshanaah
21 “Sara Sangrah” – Yoga Vasishtha 44 Brahma Sootras
22 Vedanta Sara 45 Jivanmuktananda Lahari
23 Mahabharata + Geeta Dhyanam 46 Chinmaya Pledge
– The Editor, 9th July 2017, the Holy Guru Purnima Day
Om Namah Shivaaya!
Text
13
|| SØaSØzrÉÌuÉuÉåMüÈ ||
DRIG-DRISHYA VIVEKA
“The Seer-Seen Relationship”
Composed by Sri Adi Shankaracharyaji
(The Authorship is not certain as only the above appears in the original. Three possible
Authors suggested are Adi Shankaracharya; Swami Vidyaranya, author of Pancadasi;
And Bharati Teertha, Guru of Swami Vidyaranya.)
Reflections
by SWAMI GURUBHAKTANANDA
on the 13 Lectures by Sri Swami Advaitanandaji, Director, Chinmaya Vibhooti,
to the 15th Batch Vedanta Course
at Sandeepany Sadhanalaya, Powai, Mumbai
2nd April, 2012 – 7th April, 2012
© 2017 All Rights Reserved. Copyright held by Chinmaya International Foundation, Kerala.
Declaration by the Author: The material in this series is under inspiration of the Sandeepany
Vedanta Course, but largely consists of the Author’s reflections on the Course. He is
deeply indebted to the Chinmaya Mission for its excellent presentation of the Course
by their renowned and dedicated Acharyas.
Personal Dedication
1. To my Parents, Smt Sharadaben & Sri Ratilalbhai Kapitan
who inspired me to study in life, to stick to the path of Dharma and pursue the
highest ideals; and swamped me with their abundant Love;
*****
|| SØaSØzrÉÌuÉuÉåMüÈ ||
DRIG-DRISHYA VIVEKA
“The Seer-Seen Relationship”
FOR SAMSKRIT TEXT WITH SANDHEES
Guide to Splitting Sandhees
Conventional Samskrit Format is used in the body of the book.
Split-Sandhee Samskrit Format is given at the end of the book, for the benefit of
beginners. Word-combinations (Sandhees) are highlighted in bold underline (as shown in
the table below) to help indicate the splitting of words. This is an original feature.
Purpose: To assist new students who are just finding their way in Samskrit to break
up the words (Pada Chheda). It is not intended for those already proficient in Samskrit.
How it Works: 1. Enables normal chanting. The bold underlined letters are Sandhees,
not words, and are needed only to join words for correct chanting.
2. Indicates splitting of words. To determine the words on either side of the
Sandhee, the following table may be used. [The table has been applied in the transliteration
within the body of the book, where individual words are used.]
*****
|| SØaSØzrÉÌuÉuÉåMüÈ ||
Drig-Drishya Viveka
“The Seer-Seen Relationship”
CONTENTS
1
Chapter 4: MEDITATIONAL TECHNIQUES 25
*****
2
INTRODUCTION
*****
*****
3
SØaÉç-SØzrÉ ÌuÉuÉåMü
DRIG-DRISHYA VIVEKA
Chapter 1: (Verses 1-5)
1 Roopam drishyam lochanam drik, Form is the seen, the eye is the seer;
2 tat drishyam drik tu maanasam; that eye is the seen, and mind is its seer;
3 Drishyaa dhee-vrittayah saakshee of the thoughts in the mind, the Inner Witness
4 drik eva na tu drishyate. alone is the Seer, and is never the seen.
A Note on Invocation:
No direct invocation is used in this text. However, it is usual in such cases that a
direct reference at least be made to the Lord. Here, the word Sakshee, meaning ‘Witness’,
provides such a reference. In the Geeta, Lord Krishna gives Sakshee as one of His Names.
Four Levels of Existence: In this text, the author begins by looking at the four levels
of existence. Presented in order of rising importance, they are:
i) Roopam – “form”, referring to all the physical sense objects of this universe.
ii) Lochanam – “the eye”, which stands for all the five sense organs of perception.
iii) Manas – “the mind”, which includes the entire inner equipment called
Antahkarana (mind, intellect, memory and Ego).
4
iv) Sakshee – “the Witness”, refers to the Atman or supreme Self or Brahman, the
universal Self. This is the highest principle in Vedanta.
Sense/Object Element
a. ear/sound Space,
b. skin/touch Air,
c. eye/sight Form,
d. tongue/taste Water
e. nose/smell Earth.
ii) The mind/eye relationship: 2 The mind as seer sees each sense organ, which
becomes the seen. All sense organs have the mind as their master. They send their reports
or signals to the mind for further action.
iii) The Sakshee/mind relationship: 3-4 This is at the highest level. The inner Witness
does not have any principle higher than It that can see It. Thus the Sakshee cannot ever
become a seen object of any other Seer. It is the ultimate Seer (capital letter used in
referring to this fact). The thoughts in the mind are considered to be ‘objects’ seen by the
Sakshee, the Seer.
Extrapolated from this verse are the following Six Principles which govern all of these
three ‘seer-seen’ relationships:
5
‘Inertness’ does not mean being immobile, having no life, etc, as it is commonly
understood. ‘Inert’ here is a technical word referring to the ‘seen’ in relation to the ‘seer’.
Other words used in its place are ‘insentient’ (when its seer is considered to be ‘sentient’)
and ‘object’ (when its seer is considered as ‘subject’).
In the next 3 verses deal with each of the three types of seer/seen relationships,
taken one at a time. Note the word Ekadhaa (“remaining the same”) has been underlined in
each verse. The seer is always one – principle 1 above.
1-3 We have already made reference to the infinite number of sense objects that can
exist. New forms are being created all the time, by nature as well as by man himself. Each
sense organ has a vast range of objects to differentiate from and to experience.
4 The same eye sees all the varieties. There is only one eye seeing all the objects.
This is in accord with principle 1.
Acharyaji put forward a hypothetical case of many eyes and noses:
Imagine the difficulty that we would have if we had to use a different eye to see each
different colour! Fortunately we do not carry with us spare eyes, and spare noses! Like the
cameraman who has to keep changing his lens to suit different conditions in photography,
we would have to keep changing eyes and noses. And where will we keep the spares? If we
pull out a nose instead of an eye, there will be a big problem. Thank God that one eye and
one nose is sufficient for the whole range of objects presented to them.
1-4 The mind is one, whereas there are five different sense organs which report to it.
Each sense organ can receive only the signal that it is tuned to receive. The ear can only
6
hear, the nose can only smell. From the same sense object, all the five sense organs pick up
the five signals concerning them and send it to the mind. The mind then integrates all these
signals and forms the composite assessment of the particular object.
The full information is obtained only by the mind. In this sense the mind is the
master of all five sense organs. Mind is the seer and the senses are the seen.
The mind can study each of the sense organs physically, but it cannot study itself. To
know the mind, there has to be some factor other than the mind. What is that?
Varieties in Thoughts
1-3 The number of thoughts is as innumerable as the sense objects, multiplied by 5
for the type of signal from each of the sense organs, and then multiplied by the different
interpretation given to it by the existing thoughts, feelings and emotions already in the
Chitta or memory of the mind.
The list given in the verse for the different types of thoughts arising is by no means
exhaustive. There are an amazing variety of thoughts applicable to just one object, what to
speak of all the countless objects that the mind knows. It is truly ‘mind-boggling’!
Desires arise from imagination. Imagination begins to get active when one is not
happy with the present condition. For example, hunger is a feeling of wanting to have food.
It is natural. When hunger comes, the mind starts desiring food. When one is full and
content, that desire goes down and another one comes up in it place.
Guruji used to say, “Desires are like the tissues packed in a box. You pull out one
tissue and another is raised up automatically to be pulled out.” Desires wait in a long queue
that is never-ending. Feeding desires is like pouring water into a bottomless bucket.
Hreer-Dheer-Bheer: apart from being a list of more varieties in thought, these words
together make a rhyme which is like the sound of a car when it is taking off, turning or
applying brakes! Craving presses the accelerator; a doubt comes along and the brakes come
into action; desires mounting onto one another are like hairpin bends one after another!
4 Sakshee: “the Witnessing Consciousness”. Only something external to the mind can
know it. That is Consciousness. It is really an enormous amount of information that is
conveyed from the mind to the Seer of all seers, the Sakshee, the Atman or inner Witness.
This is dealt with in greater detail in the next verse…
7
Verse 5: Qualities of the Sakshee (Witness)
lÉÉåSåÌiÉ lÉÉxiÉqÉåirÉåwÉÉ lÉ uÉ×먂 rÉÉÌiÉ lÉ ¤ÉrÉqÉç |
xuÉrÉÇ ÌuÉpÉÉirÉjÉÉlrÉÉÌlÉ pÉÉxÉrÉåixÉÉkÉlÉÇ ÌuÉlÉÉ || 5||
1 Na udeti na astam eti eshaa, This (Witness) does not rise, nor does It set;
2 na vriddhim yaati na kshayam; It does not increase, nor does It decrease;
3 swayam vibhaati atha anyaani, It shines by itself and then others
4 bhaasayet saadhanam vinaa. does It illumine, without any external aid.
At the end of the ‘seer-seen’ chain is the Sakshee, the ultimate Seer. This is none
other than the Supreme Being or Brahman, known at the individual level as the Atman and
in relation to the body-mind complex as the Sakshee or Witness. The Atman has all the
qualities of Brahman; they are not two but one.
1 The Self “not rising or setting” refers to it not being born and and not dying.
*****
8
DRIG-DRISHYA VIVEKA
Chapter 2: (Verses 6-12)
Reflection of Consciousness
1 Chit Chhaayaa: “Reflected Consciousness.” Firstly, Consciousness is present
everywhere and is reflecting off everything that is manifested, gross as well as subtle.
However gross objects cannot reflect it as well as the subtle. This may be compared to light
which reflects very well off a surface of water and very poorly off a piece of wood.
The intellect is the most subtle object in creation, and in particular the intellect of
man. Here we are dealing with this reflection, which is the best reflection one can get.
2a Bhaanam: “appears conscious”. The Consciousness reflected off the surface of
the intellect is of such a high quality, that it imparts consciousness to the intellect, i.e. the
intellect appears conscious, sentient and alive. This is the first result of the reflection.
‘Objects’ (beings) which have the mind respond well in the presence of this all-
pervading Consciousness. They are like the TV sets which are tuned in to receive the TV
signals pervading the air, and which can thus reproduce the pictures transmitted. Other
objects which do not have the apparatus to tune in cannot reproduce these pictures.
The Sattwic subtle body component called the intellect responds very clearly to the
presence of Consciousness and thus gains the quality of being sentient from this interaction.
i) Ahamkriti: “The Ego”. 3 This is such a specialized part of the Antahkarana, that in
this text it is separated from it and considered as an independent part. The basic component
of the Ego is the Aham or the “I”-thought.
ii) Intellect, Mind & Memory: 4 The remaining three parts of the Antahkarana, as
listed in 2b above, are clubbed together for the sake of this discussion. They refer to all
other thoughts. Thus, we now have the details of the two groups of thoughts.
[The same point has been elaborately described in Atma Bodha in verses 17 and 25,
where it was termed “unholy wedlock” in the commentary by Swami Chimayanandaji.]
The next verse takes us a step further in the thought build-up…
In this verse the first part of the two parts of thought is taken up – the Ahamkara
Vritti or just Ahamkriti, as used in the above verse.
1 Its relationship with reflected Consciousness is being considered.
2 We are familiar with the hot iron ball simile encountered in Atma Bodha (v.62).
The simile describes how the reflected consciousness and the Ego transfer their
qualities to each other. The simile works like this:
An iron ball is round and cold; fire is of no all-pervading (no fixed shape) and hot by
nature. When the two come in contact, they transfer each other’s properties. The Iron ball
begins to glow red like the fire; and the fire takes on the round appearance of the iron ball.
This is a mutual transfer of properties, called Anyonya Adhyasa.
A modern example would be the inter-relationship between electricity (representing
reflected Consciousness) and a light bulb (representing the Ego). The bulb becomes
luminous, and the electricity manifests as the light through the bulb.
In the same way, in the proximity of reflected Consciousness, the Ego appears
sentient; at the same time the Consciousness takes on the qualities of the Ego.
3 Now, the same transfer of properties happens when the Ego, appearing sentient,
identifies with the inert gross body.
10
4 The gross body now appears to be sentient as well through the transfer of the
quality of sentiency that comes down through the Ego thought. The sentient body is, of
course, a living body. Without this sentiency, it is a corpse.
The purpose of this verse is to break up the Ego identifications into three distinct
categories according to the cause of each category. In this manner, the lurking “thief”
among them may be traced out and “arrested”.
Having identified the three causes of the 3 identifications of the Ego, each one can
now be dealt with in its own unique way, as dictated by logic. These 3 ways are as follows:
11
i) The Jivahood of Jiva. 1-2 This is a natural identification, which means it cannot be
avoided. If a person stands in front of a mirror he cannot avoid his reflection in the mirror.
Thus nothing can or need be done about this. This connection will go on from birth to birth.
ii) Bond with Karmas: This lasts as long as the Karmas still remain active. When they
are exhausted, the connection ends. The thing to be done is to find ways and means of
annulling all our Karmas. The science of Karma Yoga especially caters for this need. It
teaches us how to dedicate our action and how to accept the results as a gift of God.
iii) Non-recognition of the Self: This is due to delusion, the veiling power of Maya
(discussed later in the book). This can be eliminated by direct knowledge of the Self.
Basically the problem here is to establish the identity between the Jiva (Ego) and Brahman
(Atman, the Self) through Self-enquiry. As Ego is illusory, it can have no connection with Self.
If iii) happens without ii), i.e. if one realizes that he is the Self, not the Ego, before all
his Karmas are cleared, then we have the case of an enlightened person who still has to go
through the unexhausted part of his Karma. He is a Jivanmukta, liberated while living, but he
is still subject to his Prarabdha Karma until his death.
When ii) happens without iii), i.e. the Prarabdha Karma is cleared but no knowledge
of the Self has been received, then, as with the bulk of humanity, the person dies and gets
reborn to continue the balance of his Sanchita Karmas. The purpose for the current birth is
only to work out one’s Prarabdha Karma. Any further Sanchita Karma gets allocated to the
next and future births.
In this book, the word Ego is used where normally the word Jiva is used in other
Vedanta texts. This is done in order to emphasise the role played by the ego in entrapping
the Jiva into this Samsaric delusion.
It is not the Self alone that undergoes the experience of embodied life in all the
three states, but the reflected Self which has the confused identity of being the body and
mind equipment. By using the word Ego, attention is drawn to the main problem area which
makes Jiva and Brahman appear separate.
1-2 The purpose of this verse is to show us that as is the availability of the Ego, so is
the activity of the thoughts in the mind. The availability of Ego was discussed in the last
verse. We pick each of the three cases in the three states, and check out what the thoughts
are busy doing:
i) Deep Sleep: As there is no consciousness of the inner equipment in this state, i.e.
the mind and intellect are not available, no thoughts can arise in this state. Hence there is
no mention of deep sleep at all in this verse.
ii) Dream: 3 There is semi-consciousness of the mind and no consciousness of the
body in dream. The small awareness of the mind makes it project the impressions it
gathered during the waking state, but in a befuddled order, due to the semi-consciousness.
iii) Waking: 4 There is full consciousness of both mind and body in this state. Hence,
the play of the Ego is maximum during waking. It manifest on all fronts, to the maximum
degree. This shows in the projection of external sense objects. All the five senses can run
riot in this state if the Ego is not held in check.
13
Verse 12: The Characteristics of Thoughts
qÉlÉÉåÅWûƒ¡ÙûirÉÑmÉÉSÉlÉÇ ÍsÉ…¡ûqÉåMÇü eÉQûÉiqÉMüqÉç |
AuÉxjÉɧÉrÉqÉluÉåÌiÉ eÉÉrÉiÉå ÍqÉërÉiÉå iÉjÉÉ || 12||
By the words ‘mind and ego’ are meant the two kinds of thoughts as taught in verse
6 at the very outset of this Chapter. The ‘Characteristics of Thought’ is the subject matter of
this verse.
1 Firstly, thoughts dwell in the Antahkarana, i.e. Mind and Ego, where mind stands
for the mind, intellect and memory.
2 Thoughts are thus very much the essence of the subtle body equipment within us.
This subtle body, like the gross body, is also an insentient part of creation.
3 Insentient here means that it is part of the Not-Self, hence it is unreal.
It is the unreal that goes through the three states one by one. The Real, the
Witnessing Self, is the substratum of all the three states.
4 Although inert by nature, thoughts appear to be sentient or conscious. This was
explained already in verses 6 and 7. They are not the Self. They are not very different
technically from the gross body. Thus thoughts also have a birth and a death.
The physical body’s death is easily understood. The subtle body’s death is a little
different. It packs up at the time of death and leaves the gross body. Then it goes to its new
body (the next birth) and unpacks all its components into that body to continue existing
through that body. Its real ‘death’ occurs when all the Karmas it carries get exhausted.
*****
14
DRIG-DRISHYA VIVEKA
Chapter 3: (Verses 13-21)
C HAPTER TWO DEALS WITH the ‘non-existent’ or Vedantically unreal aspect of life.
Reality is the Self. Only the Self (Brahman in the macrocosm) is given Reality status in
Vedanta. When It is reflected through the unreal subtle body, the reflected Consciousness is
considered as ‘unreal’. The present chapter discusses how this ‘unreal’ subtle body
originated. That will assist us in coming out of our state of bondage.
INTRODUCTION TO MAYA
Chapter 1 taught us that the Seer is opposite in nature to the seen. The ultimate Seer
is the Self, which is Existence-Consciousness (verse 5). The seen has been described in
Chapter 2 as ‘non-existent’, inert or insentient realm of objects – from the gross body, then
as the subtle sense organs, and finally as the even subtler mind and Ego.
This chain of ‘non-existence’ has its origin in what Vedanta defines as Maya.
Guruji makes it clear that Maya does not really exist. “It is postulated only to account
for our experience of the world”. In Vedanta nothing other than Brahman is given Reality
status. Both Brahman and Maya are said to be indescribable. From the perspective of the
world, that is, from our perspective, Maya’s origin can never be explained. We can only
know the truth about Maya when we realize the Self. And then, from the perspective of
Truth, Maya simply does not exist!
However to postulate Maya does help considerably to make things easier to
understand in this ‘illusory’ world. We have to accept that as our starting point for Maya.
Acharyaji told us a nice story to illustrate the usefulness of postulating Maya. A King
had left 17 horses to be distributed in his will to his 3 sons. The proportions were to be ½,
1/3rd, and 1/9th. How to do that? His wise minister added his own horse to the 17 and then
worked out the distribution as 9 + 6 + 2 = 17. He then rode away on his own horse!
15
The horse in the last story is Maya. There does not exist a definition for Maya, except
that it is the illusory power of Brahman.
1-2 There are two aspects to Maya’s power. They are the veiling power and the
projecting power.
3-4 There are two parts to what is projected by Maya – the subtle and the gross. The
entire subtle body (mind, intellect, ego, Prana, sense organs) comprises the ‘experiencer’ of
creation. The entire gross body comprises the ‘experienced’ in creation.
Both bodies are considered to be inert or insentient on their own. The Self gives the
subtle body creation some sentiency, which the subtle body passes on to the gross body.
This much we have already seen in Chapter 2.
1 Srishtih naama brahma roope Reality in name and form is called Creation.
2 sat-chid-aananda vastuni; Existence-Consciousness-Bliss, is the entity in which,
3 abdhau phena aadivat sarva, like foam in the ocean, all
4 naama roopa prasaaranaa. names and forms are manifested.
Acharyaji marked this verse out as a very important one, as it conveys the basic idea
of the Reality-Creation relationship.
1 Brahma, Srishtih: Up till now, while we were dealing with the individual or
microcosm, the terms seer and seen have been used. Now we are shifting our attention to
the macrocosm, the whole manifested universe. In this text, the corresponding terms for
seer and seen in the macrocosm are Brahman or Reality and Srishtih or Creation. [Other
books may use different terms. Other common terms for Creation are Jagat or universe;
Brahmanda or macrocosm; and Samashti or the Manifested world.]
2 Satchidananda, which is a direct way of defining the Reality or more commonly
Brahman, is here described with the word Vastuni, which means ‘that which stays always’.
3-4 The external universe is a manifestation of names and forms. They are related to
the Reality as foam and waves are related to the ocean. This is a beautiful simile indeed.
In two verses, Creation, the work of Maya’s projecting power called Vikshepa Shakti,
has been described. It is important to note that the subtle body is included as a projection of
Maya. This means that the realm of the mind, organs of knowledge, organs of action and
the Pranas are all part of Creation. This is why they are defined as insentient.
16
Antah drik-drishyayoh bhedam The distinctions between the Seer and the seen
1 within,
2 bahih cha brahma sargayoh; and between the Reality and Creation outside,
3 aavrinoti aparaa shaktih is veiled by the other power, the Veiling Power,
4 saa samsaarasya kaaranam. which is the cause of Samsara (the universe).
At a deeper level than the projecting power, and the very cause of it, is the second
power of Maya, the Veiling Power. This is now being explained. The discussion on the veiling
power continues up to verse the end of the Chapter, since it is the very root of the spiritual
delusion that bests all mankind.
The primary purpose of this verse is to state clearly what is veiled from what. That is
the basic identity crisis we are experiencing.
1-2 The terms used in these Padas have been explained in 1 in the last verse in
relation to the projecting power. The veiling is described to take place at the same two
levels as the projecting: i.e. microcosmic and macrocosmic; within and outside.
What is the actual veiling?
3 Without actually stating the nature of the veiling, this verse introduces the
explanation which follows in the last two verses of this Chapter (20 and 21).
Guruji says, “We know that we are, but we do not know who we are.” This is due to
veiling. The veiling is sufficient to make one wrongly identify with the body (subtle as well as
gross). More on this will be said later.
4 From the moment this identity gets misplaced, our involvement in Samsara begins.
We are caught in this world of action due to the endless demands of the body and mind.
The meaning of Samsara is “never steady”. Although that is not a problem to us, our
attachment to it is, and we cannot get permanent happiness from it.
This verse may be compared with verses 6 and 7, under the Chapter on the Ego. It is
almost identical to those verses except that, instead of using ‘Ego’, this verse uses ‘Jiva’. In
this way it is established that the Ego is the root cause of the individual self holding an
independent identity from the Universal Self.
1-4 All the elements mentioned in this verse go to make up the following equation:
17
Empirical Embodied Self (the individual self) =
Witness + reflected Consciousness + subtle body + gross body.
Subtle body is underlined because that contains the main cause, the Ego.
Using the Samskrit terms this is:
Jiva = Sakshee (Atman) + Chit Chaya + Sukshma Sharira + Sthula Sharira.
It may help if we repeat the definitions of these terms here, since they are all
mentioned together:
In the Microcosm of the body, the Jiva is the one that is veiled and under delusion. It
is the one in bondage, and it alone needs to be freed. The overall strategy, in principle and
without going into details, of how the Jiva is to be freed is being given here.
18
Freeing the Jiva From Bondage.
1 Jeevatvam: “Jivahood of the Jiva”. This is an interesting word through which
nothing else but the Ego is meant. Just as the sweetness of a sweetmeat lies in the sugar it
contains, so also the Jivahood of Jiva lies in the Ego, its main ingredient.
2 Saakshini: “upon the Witness”. The Ego, as we saw in verse 7 using the heated iron
ball simile, mutually superimposes itself upon the Self. As Jiva is essentially Ego, the same
thing applies to the Jiva – it superimposes itself onto the Witness or Self. The qualities
inherent in the Jiva are regarded as being the qualities of the Self.
Every Jiva is different, as no two minds (subtle bodies) are alike. According to the
quality of the mind, is the quality of the individual soul that is superimposed on the Witness.
3 Only when the cause which confused the identity in the first place is removed, 4
does it become clear that Jiva is identical to the Self. The removal of the cause means the
removal of the Ego in the inner equipment, generalized as ‘Mind’. This implies a complete
purification of the mind, so that there is no trace of ego left in it.
This is the heart of spiritual Sadhana, leading us to liberation.
Tat: In the context of the verse, this refers to all false notions. The main notion is
that of limitation of the Jiva. Finitude is associated only with the limited view imposed on
the Jiva by the Ego’s identity with the body and mind. That is the foremost notion that has
to be removed.
1-4 Now the focus shifts to the Macrocosm. We are looking at the same situation of
superimposition as above, but between Creation and Reality instead of Jiva and Self. The
verse now becomes self-explanatory.
19
Guruji explains very clearly with the following example: Maya is not something
mysterious that casts its spell over us. It is because we are lazy to use our intellect to
examine things in detail that we allow ourselves to be cheated, and then blame Maya for it!
The grain we purchase in the market is not ‘me’. When pounded, the flour is not
‘me’. When baked, the bread is not ‘me’. So, when eaten, how is it that the protein that
forms my flesh becomes ‘me’? It is just an illusion. If we enquire like this very deeply, the
illusion will go away. Knowledge has to drive ignorance away; it is the only thing that can.
The projecting power is not really troublesome; it is the veiling power that is much
more troublesome than it. When the veiling power is “unveiled” through knowledge, we
know that supreme happiness is the light at the end of the tunnel. Then, by the correct use
of the projecting power we can go through the tunnel to the light.
1 Atra api aavriti naashena In this case also, by the destruction of the veil,
2 vibhaati brahma-sargayoh; is made clear the Reality-Creation
3 bhedah tayoh vikaarah syaat, distinction. Of the two, the modification exists
4 sarge na brahmani kvachit. in Creation, never in the Reality.
As in verse 17 for the Microcosm, so too with this verse for the Macrocosm, the
remedy for the problem is the same:
1 Break the veil of ignorance, which needs knowledge of the Self.
2 The distinction becomes very clear when one has well received the knowledge of
the higher Self. Sages who have got to that stage tell us that Reality can be seen in and
through Creation. We do not have to go hunting far away for it. It is a matter of being totally
convinced as to who we are.
3-4 A very important practical point is brought out here. How do we go about with
making the correction? If we keep in mind that we, as ignorant beings, are on the same side
of the fence as Creation, then the control is on our side, not that of Reality.
Reality does not need to be changed. There will never be anything wrong with It that
we have to put right. All the flaws are with us, on the Creation side. We have to just adjust
one switch, not two. And that switch is in our own intellect. Once that is adjusted with the
right knowledge then we are assured that we will see Reality in Creation.
Another way to look at the method is this: In our ignorant state at present our
intellect “telescope” is focused on Creation. Reality appears completely blurred; It is out of
focus. Like a scientist in his laboratory who has to properly calibrate and adjust his
instrument of investigation, we also have to make our intellect keen and subtle so that
Reality can come into focus.
Then we shall clearly see that all the changes take place only in the creation and
does not affect the underlying substratum of creation, which is Reality.
How does all this help us in practice? What is the wisdom behind solving the issue?
20
If we can learn to accept that the world offers us all the pairs of opposites, it is never
constant, and that only Reality is changeless, then much of our anxiety in dealing with this
world will come to an end. Through this understanding we will gain the maturity to handle
the changing world better by not depending upon it for our happiness.
1 Asti bhaati priyam roopam “It is, it shines, it is dear, it has form,
2 naama cha iti amsha panchakam; and a name” – are the five aspects (of every entity).
3 aadya trayam brahma-roopam, The first three belong to Reality;
4 jagad-roopam tatah dvayam. the latter two belong to the World.
5 Kha vaayu agni jala urveeshu In space, air, fire, water and earth;
6 deva tiryang nara aadishu; in Deities, animals, man and all others;
7 abhinnaah sat-chid-aanandaah Existence, Knowledge and Bliss is no different;
8 bhidyate roopa-naamanee. only their names and forms differ.
These last two verses of the chapter give us a far-reaching practical helping hand to
find out for ourselves how to behold creation and how to see the Reality that pervades it.
21
By now it sounds like a riddle in a children’s magazine – “What is it?”
If we can get the subtle answer, then we have got Reality, something which every
spiritual seeker wants to know, and yet the answer is something only a handful among
humanity actually know! This is the most puzzling part of this riddle.
Is it a matter of looking, and looking and looking again and again to try and see
them? This is a case of the author coming dangerously close to teasing his readers. He, too,
is lost for words to answer the riddle. Indeed, the Upanishads themselves have answered
this riddle in so many couched ways. There is no direct answer.
The truth is that this is only a pointer to the Truth. The Truth of things is discovered
only by sufficient purity to be able to see these three in everything. Every Upanishad
wriggles out of the question by this apparently evasive answer. But that is the solution to
this riddle.
This is world we are all used – the world of names and forms. We have no problem
with identifying anything under the sun so long as we are given its name and its form. These
are quite physical characteristics. They are easily identifiable. In the case of virtually all
people, these two are all that we can know about an object. We may have no idea about the
other three characteristics showing its Reality.
22
name, we make it simpler to express ourselves in the world. Our communication is greatly
simplified.
Names and forms cannot be ignored. The verse is not saying we should ignore them.
It only tells us what their limitations are. It tells us that there is something beyond an
object’s name and form.
The name and form is only an obstacle when we view an object only with these two
qualities taken into account, i.e. we ignore the Reality behind them. In ordinary life, we are
ignoring Reality all the time. Then we are sure to run into difficulties.
23
The microcosm and the Macrocosm were studied side by side. We found that in the
former the relationship of Jiva to Self was like that of the Seer and the Seen. In the latter the
relation between Reality and Creation is more comparable to that between Unity and
Diversity.
The general lesson then is to always move our focus of awareness towards the Seer
in regard to ourself, and towards Unity in regard to the whole Creation.
This is the the direction of the spiritual solution to the human dilemma.
*****
24
DRIG-DRISHYA VIVEKA
Chapter 4: (Verses 22-31)
“Meditational Techniques”
25
The practice of meditation has two sides to it: the first is the internal process of
recognizing our true Self “in the heart”; and the second is to carry out the same process in
the outer world of names and forms and distinguish Reality within all Creation.
As an introduction to the process, we are told here that two things are essential:
i) Going Beyond Name and Form: 1 We are asked to be indifferent to the name and
form of every object, and
ii) Being Devoted to Truth: 2 The assertion of the essential qualities in all objects,
namely, ‘is-ness’, the power of knowing or ‘being-ness’, and the all-blissful nature or
‘dearness’.
3 With that basic knowledge firmly in our minds, we are ready to begin the serious
Sadhana of meditation. Meditation is prescribed so that we can have a practical means by
which to experience the truth of what we have learnt.
4 The meditation we practice has two sides to it. The first is at the microcosmic level
when we meditate to discover our true identity. The second is macrocosmic, when we
meditate in a non-ersonal manner on Creation, aiming to find the Reality in it.
Both these have been theoretically explained in previous chapters already. What
remains now is for us to learn how to bring it to a practical experience and see in our own
lives what it means to us.
What are the core varieties in meditation? The author here has carefully identified
six basic techniques of meditation. This is a great help to meet the growing interest shown
26
in this form of spiritual Sadhana throughout the world. Teachers of meditation may call their
techniques by any name; they may even give it various forms. Of these names and forms
there are any number available. But all of them should slot into one of the six that are
described from the next verse onwards.
There are two major categories in meditation: the Internal (microcosmic) and the
External (Macrocosmic). This verse only mentions the internal varieties. A similar breakdown
applies to the external meditation. For each of these two types, there are three techniques:
1-2 The first divide is that between duality and non-duality. Meditation in Duality has
to be done first before progressing to Non-dual meditation.
3-4 The meditation on Duality is further divided into two types: that associated with
the seen, and that associated with words only. This makes three techniques in the internal
category. Similarly, there are three techniques in the external category, i.e. six techniques in
all. The following table assists us to get the full picture:
INTERNAL EXTERNAL
REMARKS MICROCOSM MACROCOSM
Type A Type B
The Real factors to be ASSERTED Sakshee (Atman) Reality (Brahman)
The Unreal factors to be NEGATED All Thoughts All Objects
Sense of “I” Names and Forms
Sub-type A1: Sub-type B1:
Assoc’td with SEEN
WITH DUALITY (v.24, Drishya Anuviddha) (v.27, Prithak-Kriti)
(Savikalpa Samadhi) Sub-type A2: Sub-type B2:
Assoc’td with WORDS
(v.25, Shabda Viddha) (v.28, Akhanda)
WITHOUT DUALITY Unassociated Sub-type A3: Sub-type B3:
(Nirvikalpa Samadhi) & Unconditioned (v.26, Swa-Anubhuti) (v.29, Stabdhee Bhava)
27
The first three meditations are A1, A2 and A3, all related to the Microcosm.
A1 Meditation: Microcosm, Duality, Seen
The meditator keeps his focus within his “heart-centre”, the Hridi, as this is an
Internal meditation. Of the two types in Duality, it is the easier one using a form that can be
“seen”. The meditation begins with sense objects as the seen, then the senses become the
seen and then 1 the mind with all its thoughts become the seen 2 for the Seer, the Witness.
The practice is to just watch them as a witness. Let them arise, pass through, and
then disappear. An example of this was given in class. It is like the President watching a
march past of troops before him on Independence Day celebrations. The President is the
Sakshee and the troops are the thoughts going past him in the mind. The President is not
interested in the individual troop at all. He is just their witness.
3 We are not to fight with the thoughts; that gives them more energy to disturb us.
We are also not to start labelling the thoughts, giving them a category, etc. Not only will that
will give them reality, but it will also engage our mind to do the labelling. If it does that then
we cannot watch it as a witness. So, the more attention we give the thoughts the more real
they will appear to us. We should not entertain them at all, but just let them pass.
4 This process forces the attention to shift to the Witness, the Seer. This is “Sakshee-
Bhava” Savikalpa Samadhi.
A stage above the A1 meditation is the A2 meditation. All other things remaining the
same, the difference is that instead of focussing on the seen, one focuses on an auto-
suggestion – with words – which leads one to the Truth. This is more effective than A1, and
can only be done after A1 has been perfected.
1-2 The “unattched Satchidananda” refers to none other than the same Witnessing
Self within, free from Duality.
3 When the mind is relatively free from various thought-forms, the meditator can
move on to this A2 type. The upsurge of thoughts is not present to disturb him, and so he
can now make use of a suggestion like the one given in the verse. The suggestion is repeated
slowly in the mind with great feeling that it is actually taking place. By an effort of the will,
the meditator makes his suggestion materialize.
He may use some Mantras or powerful words or auto-suggestions that bring his
mind again and again to focus on the Self. Whenever the attention wants to drift away, he
brings it back through repeating this Mantra or suggestion. One such suggestion is given by
28
Sri Adi Shankaracharya: “Unattached am I”, “I am Satchidananda”, “I am ever unperishing”.
Such words help to keep the attention abiding in the Self.
4 The meditator arrives at “Shabda Viddhah” Savikalpa Samadhi. This state is a little
more advanced than that reached in A1 meditation, as it is practiced without any thoughts
arising from the mind, so there is deeper concentration on the Self.
This requires the mind to be very pure enough not to raise disturbing thoughts. If
disturbing thoughts still come up then one has to revert to the A1 meditation.
*****
29
Type B: EXTERNAL, in the MACROCOSM:
1 Hrideeva baahya deshe api As in the heart, so in any outer place as well
2 yasmin kasmin cha vastuni; that is associated with objects.
3 samaadhih aadyah sat maatraat The first type (with seen) is this: from Existence
4 naama-roopa PRITHAK KRITIH. the name and form of objects are separated.
Type A or Internal meditation deals with the individual. Now we come to the next
three meditations, B1, B2 and B3, which deal with the entire macrocosmic creation. The
focus is on the world outside. Type B or external meditation teaches one how to see Reality
behind all names and forms. We begin with B1, the external equivalent of A1.
1 The difference between internal and external meditation is this: In the internal
meditation the practice is done with reference to the individual. In external meditation, the
practice is with reference to the world perceived outside.
2 This meditation is associated with objects outside. External meditation has to be
practised with eyes open and while one is moving and acting, walking or talking in the
world. It is a training of the mind to behold the Reality instead of the illusion in objects.
3-4 In this practice, we start by ‘peeling off’ the name and form of objects. The
objects are what are ‘seen’. Hence this is a meditation which is a counterpart of A1. In place
of thoughts within, we have objects outside that need to be negated.
For example let us take the ocean. We see on its surface waves and foam. We see
beyond the waves and the foam and see the water that is their basis. We meditate on the
perishability of the waves and on the permanence of the water. We try focusing on the
water in the wave. Similarly, we do this with all other objects – go past the name and form
and see the essence.
The meditation leads one on to the next stage…
1 AKHANDA eka rasam vastu “Undivided and of the same essence is the Reality,
2 satchidaananda lakshanam; of the nature of Existence-Consciousness-Bliss.”
3 iti avicchhinna chintaa iyam This is uninterrupted contemplation
4 samaadhih madhyamah bhavet. of the middle type of meditation, i.e. B2.
30
In B1 the attention is on trying to negate the name and form, the object’s Creation
qualities; in B2 the difference is only this – that the attention shifts to the Satchidananda,
the object’s Reality qualities. B1 has to be failrly well-mastered before B2 can be attempted
with success. The B2 stage is the external equivalent of A2. One takes the help of some
auto-suggestions in words to establish oneself in the Reality.
1-2 The words quoted in the verse are an example of an auto-suggestion that could
be used to help one to focus on the underlying Reality in the outer world. The three
qualities in any object that represent its Reality are the focus of attention, namely Sat-Chit-
Ananda. This meditation can be done with open eyes in the midst of peaceful nature, to
enhance the mind’s focussing power on the subject of its meditation.
3 Both B1 and B2 require effort in order to firmly establish the Truth in one’s mind.
The effort is needed until such time as the meditation becomes uninterrupted.
4 It is made very clear that this is B2, the middle stage of the Type B meditation.
Guruji expresses the simplicity of this meditation very beautifully in these words:
“One does not become great or extraordinary by the practice of this meditation. One knows
that one is the greatest Truth which resides even in the most ordinary beings.” The Reality is
uniformly seen in all objects.
Thus meditation does not make one stand out in a crowd as a ‘better’ person. There
are other easier ways of doing that!
31
2 As one recognizes the Self to be the true “I” of the individual being in the A3 stage,
so does one recognize Brahman or the Reality to be the most inner essence of all Creation in
this, the B3 type meditation. The descriptions of the six meditations conclude at this point.
3-4 These six meditations cover the whole range of different types of meditations.
Whatever other names may be given to meditation – and there are numerous trademarked
versions in the spiritual marketplace – all of them will fall within the scope of the six
varieties described here.
Finally, the author Sri Adi Shankaracharyaji brings in a verse from one of the major
Upanishads to support his statements about what Liberation is. This verse is from the
Mundaka Upanishad. The author shows us that what he has taught in this text is the same
as what the ancient Vedas declared as the immortal Truth.
This verse spells out the threefold benefits of practicing meditation:
i) The knots of the heart are cut: 1 What are these knots? Here are seven of them,
placed in a sequence from cause to effect. The first one is Ignorance, from which all other
knots arise. Discontent or the feeling of incompleteness due to Ignorance, creates desires of
various kinds by which it is hoped that the vacuum will be filled. To fulfill the desires, actions
have to be done to the desired objects. This sets off the next tier of knots, namely, meeting
with competition from others who aim for the same objects. Then come the Shad Vikaras,
namely, disappointment, anger, greed, jealousy, envy, meanness. This is followed by
compromising our morality, which incurs accumulating bad Karma. From this arises
transmigration, the endless cycle of births and deaths in this world. This whole vicious circle,
from Ignorance to transmigration, is referred to as “knots of the heart.”
ii) All doubts are resolved: 2 Realisation eliminates all doubt from the mind. Doubts
and fears only exist in a mind plagued by a feeling of separation. Realisation integrates us to
the whole world, so doubts can never arise.
iii) All Karmas are exhausted: 3 Karmas are payable only by the soul tied in bondage
to this world. After Self-realisation, the individual is ‘dead’ and so the person accountable
for payment of Karmic debts no longer ‘exists’. At one stroke he is freed from Karmas that
had accumulated from time immemorial.
33
4 Paraavare: “Him who is high and low”. We have seen in this text that God resides
everywhere. The common human concept of greatness is shattered. It is not something
possessed by the rich and the powerful. God sees all equally. He can work great things even
among the poor and those placed in humble situations in life.
*****
CONCLUSION
Om Tat Sat!
*****
34
Drig-Drishya Viveka
“The Seer-Seen Relationship”
by Sri Adi Shankaracharya
SØaÉç-SØzrÉ ÌuÉuÉåMü
35
qÉlÉç-AÉå ÅWÇû-M×üiÉç-rÉç EmÉÉSÉlÉÇ , ÍsÉ…¡ûqÉç LMÇü eÉQûÉiqÉMüqÉç |
AuÉxjÉÉ-§ÉrÉqÉç AluÉåÌiÉ , eÉÉrÉiÉå ÍqÉërÉiÉå iÉjÉÉ ||12||
|| Á iÉiÉç xÉiÉç ||
Om Tat Sat!
*****
DRIG-DRISHYA VIVEKA
“The Seen-Seer Relationship”
by Sri Adi Shankaracharya
d»g-d»¾ya viv£ka
Chapter 1: “The Seer-Seen Relationship” (Verses 1-5)
38
kha v¡y-v agni jal-µrv§½u , d£va tirya± nar-¡-:'di½u |
abhinn¡-s sac-cid-¡nand¡¦ , bhidyat£ rÀpa-n¡man§ ||21||
|| µ° tat sat ||
Om Tat Sat!
*****
39