Mcchesney 18 Months Charges
Mcchesney 18 Months Charges
Mcchesney 18 Months Charges
THE DEFENDANT:
☒ admitted guilt to violation of condition(s) 2 thru 7 on 8/17/2017 of the term of supervision.
☐ was found in violation of condition(s) counts(s) after denial of guilt.
The defendant is sentenced as provided in pages 2 through 2 of this judgment. The sentence is imposed in accordance with 18 U.S.C.
§ 3553 and the Sentencing Guidelines.
☒ The defendant has not violated condition(s) 1 and is discharged as to such violation(s) condition.
It is ordered that the defendant must notify the United States attorney for this district within 30 days of any change of name, residence,
or mailing address until all fines, restitution, costs, and special assessments imposed by this judgment are fully paid. If ordered to pay restitution,
the defendant must notify the court and United States attorney of material changes in economic circumstances.
Last Four Digits of Defendant’s Soc. Sec.: 3562 August 17, 2017
Date of Imposition of Judgment
Defendant’s Year of Birth: 1984
in Custody
IMPRISONMENT
The defendant is hereby committed to the custody of the United States Bureau of Prisons to be imprisoned for a total term of:
18 months. No term of Supervised Release to follow. The eighteen months represents an upward departure for the following
reasons: Mr. McChesney continues to pose a danger to the community as evidenced by his previous revocations and the
circumstances surrounding the current violation. He has shown willful violation of his conditions of supervised release to
include various infractions. In addition to the above, the court considered his new arrest for resisting arrest, his continued
abuse of illicit substances, failure to attend substance abuse treatment in order to address his long time affliction and the
defendant’s failure to comply with even the most basic requirements of supervision, ultimately deciding to stop reporting to
Probation. Despite being afforded opportunities to change his criminal thinking and address his addiction, the current
revocation represents the defendant’s third revocation for such violations, resulting in a pattern of high risk behaviors. He has
failed to demonstrate any willingness to change. Thus, the court found the sentence sufficient, but not greater than necessary
to address the conduct set forth in the violations.
RETURN