Alarm Philosophy Example
Alarm Philosophy Example
Alarm Philosophy Example
to Operation
Standards
Certification
Education & Training
Publishing
Conferences & Exhibits
About the Presenter
Nicholas Sands, CAP, PE
• ISA Fellow
• Technology Fellow at DuPont
• Alarm management and HMI best practice leader
• 25 years of experience in chemical plants
• Co-chair of ISA18 standard committee
• Secretary of IEC 62682 standard committee
• ISA Vice President of Standards and Practices
2
Outline
• Background
• HMI Lifecycle
• HMI Philosophy
• HMI Style Guide and Tool Kit
• User Requirements
• Testing
• Training
• Support
• Questions
Background: The Last Panel Board
ENTRY ENTRY
• Philosophy
– Overall guiding document for
HMI design and management
– Emphasizes ergonomics and
performance
– Document objectives around
situation awareness
HMI
– Documents requirement for ON
MOC
– Document other processes (task
analysis)
– Document “rules”
– Defines terms
HMI Philosophy Example – Level 3 Rules
• From 1 Console
9 (multi-
Station
(multi-
monitor)
Stations
? X
Display ? X ? X Popup
(Full-Screen)
Displays
? X
Graphic
Display Symbols
Components
Graphic
Elements
HMI Style Guide & Toolkit
• Style Guide
– Vendors offer style guides
– Designed on ASM or HPHMI
principles
• Toolkit
– Display of selected and
approved symbols
– Started with vendor library
– Modified or configured to meet
user requirements
– Control changes to the toolkit
Design
• Console Design
– To provide hardware and software design for the
Console. This includes furniture and supporting
systems.
• HMI System Design
– Identify design basis for the HMI system.
• User, Task, Functional Requirements
– Identify primary and secondary requirements
supported in the HMI.
• Display Design
– Identifies conceptual design for displays and the
navigation hierarchy. (This may include some
prototype displays on complex applications or
processes).
• Review
Console and System Design
• Console Design
– Mostly vendor standards
– Single area
– Two stations on a desk
– Mouse issues
• System Design
– Mostly vendor standards
– User groups
– Some modifications for user
requirements
• Display Design
– Template display
– Display and font size
User and Task Requirements
• Task Analysis
– Informal method
– Review each operating
procedure against the
displays
– Verify each action can be
taken
– Look for ways to improve
the execution by modifying
display content
– Where needed, develop
task specific displays
Implement
• Build Displays
– Complete construction of displays and supporting
items. (User review occurs in the design stage,
which include prototypes).
• Build Console
– Complete construction of console hardware and
software. Test viewing angles, screen elevations,
keyboard and input device placement and location
of other elements.
• Test
– Integrated Test of HMI and Console.
• Train
– Train Users.
• Commission
– Final testing of HMI in Production Environment.
• Verification
– Verify HMI Ready to Operate.
Build Displays and Consoles
• Build Console
– Time consuming to work
through system details
• Build Displays
– Focus on flow and simplification
– Built L3 displays first
– Simple process with 6 main
operating displays (L3)
– Many more detailed displays
(L4)
– Built 1 overview display (L1/L2)
last
– Many iterations with toolkit
changes
Training
• Testing
– Completed with dynamic simulation
– Real configuration in simulated
controller
• Commissioning & Verification
– Done during shutdown
– Completed with DCS controller
commissioning
– Released for operation
ISA 101 Results
21