Simulacion Aero Enfriador PDF
Simulacion Aero Enfriador PDF
Simulacion Aero Enfriador PDF
air-cooled heat-exchanger design. In this chapter the primary concern is obtaining a workable (and reasonable) design rather than
an optima) design. However, the importance of optimization in this context should not be overlooked.
Example 12.1
A liquid hydrocarbon stream with a flow rate of 250,000 lb/h is to be cooled from 2S0ºF to lS0ºF in an air-cooled heat exchanger.
The unit will be mounted at grade and there are no space limitations at the site. The design ambient air temperature is 95ºF and the
site elevation is 250 ft above mean sea level. An outlet air temperature of lS0ºF is specified for the purpose of this example. Average
properties of the hydrocarbon and airare given in the table below. A fouling factor of 0.001 h · ft2 · ºF/Btu is required for the
hydrocarbon, which is not corrosive, anda maximum pressure drop of 20 psi is specified for this stream. Inlet pressure will be SO
psia. The maximum allowable air-side pressure drop is 0.5 in. H 20. Designan air-cooled heat exchanger for this service:
Solution
(a) Make initial specifications.
(i) Tubing type
G-fin tubing with carbon steel tubes and aluminum fins is specified based on its excellent durability. It is assumed that the
environment at the plant site is not highly corrosive; otherwise, bimetallic tubing would be a better choice.
(ii) Tube size and layout
One inch OD, 13 BWG tubes with 10 fins per inch, fin height of 0.625 in. and average fin thickness of 0.013 in. are
specified with reference to Table 12.1. The tube layout is triangular (30º) with a tube pitch of 2.5 in.
(iii) Draft type
Since the process fluid temperature is below 3S0ºF, an induced-draft unit will be used. For simplicity, diffusers are not
specified and it is assumed that winterization of the unit is unnecessary.
(iv) Headers
The pressure is low and based on the specified tube-side fouling factor, frequent cleaning is not anticipated. Therefore,
plug-type headers will be used.
(b) Energy balances.
q = (mCp~T)Hc = 250,000 x O.SS x 100 = 13,750,000 Btu/h
For the specified outlet air temperature of lS0ºF, the required mass flow rate of air is:
. q 13,750,000 /
mair = 1 ) = ----- = 1,037,344lbm h
Cp~T air 0.241 X 55
(c) LMTD.
100-55 0
(~T¡n)c¡ = . , , __ , = 75.27 F
Thus, the ratio of heat-transfer surface area to bundle face area is:
From Table 12.1, the dosest ratio is 107.2 for four tube rows. Using this value, the required face area is:
2
A¡ace = 45, 105/107.2 = 420.8 ft
Based on the design guidelines, a tube length, L, of three times the bundle width, W, is assumed, giving:
2
A¡ace = 420.8 = WL = 3 W
Thus,
W = 11.84 ft
L= 3 X 11.84 = 36 ft
The number of tubes is found using the value of ATot /L = 5.58 from Table 12.1.
A 45,105
n1 = ----- = ---- = 224.5
(ATor/L) X L 5.58 X 36
Taking the dosest integer divisible by four gives 224 tubes with 56 tubes per row. The corresponding bundle width is the tube
pitch times the number of tubes per row. Allowing 2 in. for side dearances gives:
W = 2.5 X 56 +2 = 142 in.= 11.83 ft
The actual bundle face area and (standard) face velocity are:
2
A¡ace = WL = 11.83 x 36 = 426 ft
Two, three, or four passes will give a velocity in the range of 3 to 8 ft/s. Since the tube-side pressure drop allowance is fairly
generous, four passes are chosen for the first tria! in order to maximize the heat-transfer coefficient and minimize fouling.
Checking the Reynolds number:
150 - 95
P=---=0.35
o, v-s,»
Re= --- = ---------- = 8115
(1.0/12) X 66,390 X 0.0685
µ 0.0467
Note: The air density should be corrected for the average atmospheric pressure at the elevation of the plant site ( see Appendix
12.C). In the present case, the site elevation (250 ft) is such that the pressure <loes not differ significantly from one atmosphere
and, hence, no correction is needed.
Equation (12.6) is used to calculate the air-side heat-transfer coefficient with Ay0 , /A0 = 21.4 from Table 12.1:
Nu = 0.38Re06Pr113(AToi/A0)-015 = 0.38(8115)º6(O.7)113(21.4)-015
Nu = 47.22
=
k 238 x 0.57782 = 137.5 Btu/h·ft·ºF
This value is slightly optimistic because the aluminum alloys used for finning have somewhat lower thermal conductivities
than the pure metal. However, the difference is not large enough to significantly affect the results.
5
0.5 ( 2 X 9.12 )º- _1
m=(2h0/kr) = ( / ) =ll.O7ft
137.5 X 0.013 12
tanh(mV1) tanh(O.7494)
Y/¡= --- = ----- = 0.8471
mVI 0.7494
524 Air-Cooled Heat Exchangers
The extended and prime surface areas per inch of tube length are estimated as follows:
A¡;ns = 2N¡1rVic - r?) = 2 x 101r{ (1.1315)2 - (0.5)2} = 64.735 in.2
64.735
A,- /Ar0 t = ----- == O 96
,ms ' 64.735 + 2.733 - ·
[
(AToi/A;) (Ay0¡/L)ln(Dr/D;)
Uc= ~--+~----~+--
h; 27í kiube
1
1/who
]-l
26.3 5.58 ln(l.0/0.81)
= [-
42-0 + -- 27í
_X_2_6__ + -0 .-
8-
1
53_X_9-
. l-
2
]-l
Uc = 5.04 Btu/h-ft2-ºF
Since Uc > Ureq, continue.
(p) Fouling allowance.
The tube-side fouling factor was specified in the problem statement as 0.001 Btu/h · ft2 · ºF. Except in unusual circumstances,
air-side fouling is mínima! and, therefore, RDo is taken as zero. Thus, the total fouling allowance is:
2
RD = RDi(AToi/A;) +RDo/1/w = 0.001 x 26.3 +O= 0.0263 h·ft ·ºF/Btu
s = 49.94/62.43 = O.SO
Assuming 5-in. schedule 40 nozzles are used, the flow area per nozzle from Table B.l is 0.1390 fr'. Hence,
Gn = 250,000/0.1390 = 1,798,561 lbm/hft '
4
2e-(a/ )} { 27.2 0.29}
t= { 1 +--
1 +a
0.021 +-+--
Re,,. Reº·2
e11 eff
2e-(
0
/ )} 25 4
{ 27.2 0.29 }
= 1 +---- 0.021 +--+---- 2
{ 1 + 0.25 1130 (1130)º
f = 0.291
The pressure drop across the tube bundle is calculated using Equation (12.Sa). The air mass flux is computed first:
This unit will not require louvers, steam coils, fan guards, or hail guards. Endosure losses will be small, and other losses will be
due primarily to the fan casings, plenums, and obstructions such as fan supports and walkways. Therefore, a relatively small
allowance of 10% is made for other air-side losses, giving:
Both tube-side and air-side pressure drops are below the specified maximum values. Therefore, the unit is hydraulically
acceptable.
(u) Fan sizing.
The fans should cover at least 40% of the bundle face area. Assuming a two-fan bay, this condition gives the following relation
for the fan diameter:
2
2 ( 1rD}an/4) 2 0.4A¡ace = 0.4 X 426 = 170.4 ft
D¡an 2 10.4 ft
. _ 0.5mair _ 0.5(1,037,344/60) _ cf
Vfan - --- - ------- - 132,993 a m
Pair 0.065
Thus, each fan must deliver about 133,000 acfm at a static pressure of 0.36 in. H 2O.
526 Air-Cooled Heat Exchangers
VJan 132,993 .
V¡r = -2-- = 2 = 1536 ft/mm = 25.6 ft/s
nD¡,- 1 4 1r(l0.S) /4
_
ªfr_P_¡,_
-V_
fr = _l._0_x_0_._06_5_(_25_._6)_2 = 0_662 lbf/ft2
2gc 2x32.174
The power supplied by the motor is given by Equation (12.17); an efficiency of 95% is assumed for the speed reducer:
· W¡an 14.7
Wmotor = -- = -- = 15.5 hp
1)51 0.95
The next largest standard motor size is 20 hp (Appendix 12.B). This motor size will provide an adequate allowance for operational
flexibility and contingencies. Therefore, each fan will be equipped with a 20 hp motor. This result is preliminary pending actual fan
selection. Final values for fan efficiency and motor size will be based on the fan manufacturer's data. A fan that is well matched with
the service may have a total efficiency as high as 80% to 85%. In that case, 15 hp motors might be sufficient.
The main design parameters for the unit are summarized below.
Design Summary
can be varied automatically between user-specified limits to meet a given performance specification (usually tube-side outlet
temperature or duty) and pressure drop constraints:
HEXTRAN <loes not have a special thermodynamic package for air. Air is treated as apure component, and methods must be selected
for computing thermodynamic and transport properties. For the latter, the pure component data bank should be used by selecting
the LlBRARY method. The choice of thermodynamic method is not critical. The SRKS method, which is a modified Soave-Redlich-
Kwong cubic equation of state developed by SimSci-Esscor, is suggested here, but any equation-of-state method other than IDEAL
can be used with similar results.
Two different tube pitches must be entered to specify the tube layout in HEXTRAN. The transverse pitch is the center-to-center
distance between adjacent tubes in the same row. The longitudinal pitch is the center-to-center distance between adjacent tube rows.
For an equilateral triangular layout, this is the height of an equilateral triangle with the length of a side equal to the transverse
pitch, i.e.,
longitudinal pitch = 0.5 x (transverse pitch) x tan 60º (12.19)
Example 12.2
Use HEXTRAN to rate the air-cooled heat exchanger designed by hand in Example 12.1.
Solution
The English system of units is selected and for convenience, the unit of viscosity is changed from cp to lb/ft · h. Under Components
and Thermodynamics, air is selected from the list of components and a New Method Slate called SETl is defined on the Method
form. The SRKS equation of state is specified as the thermodynamic method and LIBRARY is specified for transport properties.
The flowsheet is constructed in the usual manner. The hydrocarbon feed is defined as a bulk property stream and the flow rate,
temperature, pressure, and physical properties are entered on the appropriate forms. The inlet air is defined (by default) as
a compositional stream and the composition (100% air), flow rate, temperature, and pressure (14.7 psia) are entered on the
appropriate form.
Data for the air-cooled heat exchanger are obtained from Example 12.1 and entered on the appropriate panels as follows: ltems
not listed are either left at the default settings or left unspecified, in which case they are calculated by the program.
The area/length entry is optional and will be calculated by the program if not given.
(e) Material
The default materials of construction, carbon steel for the tubes and aluminum alloy 1060-Hl4 for the fins, are used.
(f) Film options
The fouling factors, 0.001 h · ft2 · ºF/Btu for the tube side and zero for the air side, are entered here.
(g) Fan
The efficiency entered here is the product of the fan static efficiency ( estimated as 60%) and the speed reducer, or drive, effi-
ciency (95%). HEXTRAN uses this value to calculate the power supplied by the fan motors. Although it is not stated in the
program documentation, the static efficiency should be used here because HEXTRAN <loes not indude the velocity pressure in
the calculation of fan power.
(h) Multi-bundle
Number of bundles in series/hay: 1
Number of bundles in parallel/bay: 1
Number of bays in parallel: 1
These are the default settings in the program.
Finally, under Global Options, the Water Decant Option switch is unchecked (OFF). Water decanting is not relevant to this
problem, but if the switch is left in the default ( ON) position, an error results beca use the SRKS method <loes not support this
option.
The input file generated by the HEXTRAN GUI is given below, followed by a summary of results in the form of the Exchanger
Data Sheet and Extended Data Sheet. The data sheets were extracted from the HEXTRAN output file and used to prepare the
following comparison between computer and hand calculations:
Overall, the two sets of results are in reasonably good agreement, but there are significant differences in the air-side heat-transfer
coefficient (26%) and pressure drop (10% ). Notice that the outlet temperature of the hydrocarbon stream calculated by HEXTRAN
is 150ºF. Thus, in agreement with the hand calculations, the heat exchanger is workable, but the over-design is essentially zero
according to HEXTRAN.
Air-Cooled Heat Exchangers 529
$
$ Thermodynamic Data Section
$
THERMODYNAMIC DATA
$
METHODS SET=SETl, KVALUE=SRKS, ENTHALPY(L)=SRKS, ENTHALPY(V)=SRKS, *
ENTROPY(L)=SRKS, ENTROPY(V)=SRKS, DENSITY(L)=API, *
DENSITY(V)=SRKS, VISCOS(L)=LIBRARY, VISCOS(V)=LIBRARY, *
CONDUCT(L)=LIBRARY, CONDUCT(V)=LIBRARY, SURFACE=LIBRARY
$
WATER DECANT=OFF
$
$Stream Data Section
$
STREAM DATA
$
PROP STRM=HC, NAME=HC, TEMP=250.00, PRES=50.000, *
LIQUID(W)=250000.000, LCP(AVG)=0.55, Lcond(AVG)=0.082, *
Lvis(AVG)=l.21, Lden(AVG)=49.94
$
PROP STRM=HCOUT, NAME=HCOUT
$
PROP STRM=AIR, NAME=AIR, TEMP=95.00, PRES=l4.700, *
SET=SETl, RATE(W)=1037344.000, *
COMP(M)= 1, 100, *
NORMALIZE
$
PROP STRM=AIROUT, NAME=AIROUT
$
$ Calculation Type Section
$
SIMULATION
$
TOLERANCE TTRIAL=0.01
$
LIMITS AREA=200.00, 6000.00, SERIES=l, 10, PDAMP=0.00, *
TTRIAL=30
530 Air-Cooled Heat Exchangers
$
CALC TWOPHASE=New, DPSMETHOD=Stream, MINFT=0.80
$
PRINT UNITS, ECONOMICS, STREAM, STANDARD, *
EXTENDED, ZONES
$
ECONOMICS DAYS=350, EXCHANGERATE=l.00, CURRENCY=USDOLLAR
$
UTCOST OIL=3.50, GAS=3.50, ELECTRICITY=0.10, *
WATER=0.03, HPSTEAM=4.10, MPSTEAM=3.90, *
LPSTEAM=3.60, REFRIGERANT=0.00, HEATINGMEDIUM=0.00
$
HXCOST BSIZE=l000.00, BCOST=0.00, LINEAR=50.00, *
EXPONENT=0.60, CONSTANT=0.00, UNIT
$
$ Unit Operations Data
$
UNIT OPERATIONS
$
ACE UID=ACEl
TYPE Old, HOTSIDE=Tubeside, *
FLOW=Countercurrent, *
UESTIMATE=5.00, USCALER=l.00
TUBE FEED=HC, PRODUCT=HCOUT, *
LENGTH=36.00, *
OD=l.000, BWG=l3, *
NUMBER=224, PASS=4, ROWS=4, PATTERN=Staggered, *
PARA=l, SERIES=l, *
TPITCH=2.500, LPITCH=2.165, MATERIAL=l, *
FOUL=0.001, LAYER=0, *
DPSCALER=l.00
$
FINS NUMBER=lü.00, AREA=5.580, HEIGHT=0.625, *
THICKNESS=0.013, BOND=0.000, *
MATERIAL=20
$
AIRS FEED=AIR, PRODUCT=AIROUT, *
PARALLEL=l, *
FOUL=0, LAYER=0, *
DPSCALER=l.00
$
FAN DRAFT=Induced, DIAM=lü.50, NUMBER=2, EFFI=57.00
$
TNOZZ ID=5.047, 5.047 NUMBER=l, 1
$
CALC TWOPHASE=New, *
MINFT=0.80
$
PRINT STANDARD, *
EXTENDED, *
ZONES
$
COST BSIZE=l000.00, BCOST=0.00, LINEAR=50.00, *
CONSTANT=0.00, EXPONENT=0.60, Unit
$
12.10.2 HTRI
TheXace module of Xchanger Suite is used for design and rating of air-cooled heat exchangers. The program is similar in structure and
format to the Xist module discussed in previous chapters. As in Xist, the computational method in Xace is fully incremental, and the
same proprietary correlations for tube-side heat transfer and pressure drop are used in both programs. Proprietary correlations are
also used for air-side calculations. The methods for handling tube-side fluid properties are identical in the two programs; the
properties of air are generated automatically by Xace.
Xace can opera te in rating, simulation, or design mode. The rating and simulation modes are the same as in Xist. Two options are
available for design mode, namely, classic design and grid design. In classic design, the only parameters that can be varied are
bundle width, air face velocity and number of tube passes, and the parameter ranges are controlled by the program. In grid design,
transverse and longitudinal tube pitch, tube length, tube diameter, and number of tube rows can also be varied. Furthermore, the
parameter ranges are user-specified.
Xace accounts for air-side pressure losses from a number of factors in addition to the tube bundle, namely, fan rings, plenums,
steam coi!, louvers, fan guard, hail screen, and fan area blockage. The user must supply values for the percent open area in the fan
guard and hail screen, and the percentage of the fan area that is blocked by obstructions if these items are to be included in the
pressure drop calculation. The type of plenum (box or tapered) and fan ring inlet ( straight, flanged, 15° con e, 30º cone, bell) must
always be specified.
Fin geometry can be specified by the user on the appropriate input form. However, Xace has a built-in databank of finned
tubing that is available from selected manufacturers, and the user has the option of selecting the fin geometry from this
databank.
Like Xist, Xace genera tes a tube layout that can be modified by the user. Also, for tube-side condensing, the inclination of the tube
bundle can be specified in the range of 1-89º. A unique feature in Xace is an interface with software from severa! fan manufacturers.
If the user selects one of the available manufacturers, a list of fan models that will meet the requirements of the unit is printed in the
output file. The list includes pertinent information such as fan size, efficiency, speed, and power.
Air-Cooled Heat Exchangers 533
Example 12.3
Use Xace to rate the air-cooled heat exchanger designed by hand in Example 12.1 and compare the results with those obtained
previously by other methods.
Solution
Xace is run in rating mode (the default option) for this problem. Data obtained from Example 12.1 are entered on the
appropriate input forms as indicated below. Items not listed are either left at their default values or left blank to be computed by
the program.
(a) Geometry/Unit
Fan arrangement: Induced
Number of bays in parallel per unit: 1 ( default)
Number of bundles in parallel per bay: 1 ( default)
Number of tube passes per bundle: 4
The number (1) and ID (5.047 in.) ofthe tube-side inlet and outlet nozzles are also given on this form.
(b) Geometry/Fans
Number of fans per bay: 2 ( default)
Fan diameter: 10.5 ft
Total combined fan and drive efficiency: 66.5%
Fan ring type: 15ºcone
The combined fan and drive efficiency of 66.5% is equivalent to the efficiencies assumed in Example 12.1; namely, total fan
efficiency of 70% and drive efficiency of 95%. The type of fan ring entrance was not specified in Example 12.1. A 15º canica!
inlet is chosen because it gives a pressure loss in the mid-range of the values for the available options. The straight entrance has
by far the greatest loss, while the bell-shaped entrance has the least.
( e) Geometry/Optional
The only entry made on this form is the selection of a tapered plenum, which is standard for an induced-draft fan.
( d) Geometry/Bundle
Number of tube rows/tube passes: 4/4
Number of tubes in each odd/even numbered row: 56/56
Tube layout: Staggered ( default)
Tube form: Straight ( default)
Tube length: 36 ft
( e) Geometry/Tube Types/Tube Type 1/ Geometry
Fin type: Circular fin (Default) Fin base thickness: 0.013 in.
Fin density: 10 fin/in. Material: Aluminum 1060-Hl4
Fin height: 0.625 in.
Note: The fins are tapered from base to tip, but only the average thickness affects the results. If no value is entered for the fin tip
thickness, then the value entered for the base thickness is interpreted as the average thickness.
534 Air-Cooled Heat Exchangers
(g) Process
If the altitude of the unit above mean sea leve! is given here, the program accounts for the variation of atmospheric pressure
with altitude in determining the air density.
(h) Hot Fluid Properties
Bulk properties of the hydrocarbon stream are entered by first choosing Program calculated as the Physical Property Input
Option. On the Components panel, HTRI is selected as the Package to be used and <User Defined> is selected from the list of
components. Then on the Liquid Properties subpanel the density ( 49 .94 lbm/ft"}, viscosity (0.5 cp = 1.21 lbm/ft · h ), thermal
conductivity (0.082 Btu/h · ft · ºF) and heat capacity (O.SS Btu/lbm · ºF) are entered ata single reference temperature of200ºF.
This completes the data entry. No input data are required for the properties of air, which are automatically generated by the
program.
The Output Summary for this case is given below along with the tube layout and exchanger drawings produced by Xace. The
output data were used to construct the results comparison shown in the following table. Note that the air-side heat-transfer
coefficient of 7.81 Btu/h · fr' · ºF given in the output file is the effective outside coefficient, i.e., 7/w h0. The weighted efficiency is not
available in the Xace output files, but the fin efficiency computed by the program is given as 79. 7% in the Output Summary. Using
the percentages of fin (96%) and prime ( 4%) surface area calculated in Example 12.1 gives 7/w = O.SOS, from which h0 = 9. 70 Btu/h ·
ft2 · ºF:
Both tube-side and air-side heat-transfer coefficients from HEXTRAN are significantly more conservative than those from Xace. By
contrast, values of the air-side coefficient calculated by hand and by Xace agree quite well, the difference being about 6%. The tube-
side results are consistent with those from examples in previous chapters.
The overall heat-transfer coefficient calculated by hand differs from the Xace value by less than 5%. However, Xace calculated
a higher tube-side heat-transfer coefficient and lower fin efficiency. The difference in fin efficiency is attributed to the correction
applied by Xace that accounts for a non-uniform heat-transfer coefficient (see Section 2.3).
The air-side pressure drop computed by Xace is the lowest (least conservative) of the three values compared here. Note, however,
that no allowance for fan area blockage was induded in the Xace calculation for this example.
Air-Cooled Heat Exchangers 535
Example 12.3
Rating-Horizontal air-cooled heat exchanger induced dra11 countercurrent to crossflow
1 No Data Check Messages.
2 See Rtnrtirne Message Report for Warning Messages.
3 Process Conditions Outside Tubeside
4 Fluid name Hydrocarbon
5 Fluid condition Sens. Gas Sens. Liquid
6 Total flow rate (1 000-lblhr) 1 037.340 250.000
7 Weight fraction vapor, In/Out 1.0000 1.0000 0.0000 0.0000
8 Temperature, In/Out (Deg F) 95.00 150.09 250.00 150.00
9 Skin temperature, Min/Max (Deg F) 130.30 205.14 137.97 221.22
1 O Pressure, lnleVOutlet (psia) 14.565 14.553 50.000 33.680
11 Pressure drop, Total/Allow (inH2O) l(psi) 0.320 1 0.000 16.320 1 0.000
12 Midpoint velocity (flisec) 18.94 6.94
13 - In/Out (fl/sec) 6.94 6.94
14 Heat transfer safety factor H 1.0000 1.0000
15 Fouling (112-hr-F/Btu) 0.00000 0.00100
16 Exchanger Peñorrnance
17 Outside film coef (Btu/112-hr-F) 7.81 Actual U (Btu/112-hr-F) 4.665
18 Tubeside film coef (Btu/112-hr-F) 489.86 Required U (Btu/112-hr-F) 4.133
19 Clean coef (Btu/112-hr-F) 5.323 Area (112) 44629
20 Hotregime Sens. Liquid Overdesign (%) 12.86
21 Cold regime Sens. Gas Tube Geornetry
22 EMTD (Deg F) 74.5 Tube type High-finned
23 Duty (MM Btulhr) 13.750 Tube OD (inch) 1.0000
24 Unit Geornetry TubelD (inch) 0.8100
25 Bays in parallel per unit 1 Length (11) 36.000
26 Bundles parallel per bay 1 Area ratio(ouVin) H 26.512
27 Extended area (112) 44629 Layout Staggered
28 Bare area (112) 2078.2 Trans pitch (inch) 2.5000
29 Bundle width (11) 11.813 Long pitch (inch) 2.1650
30 Nozzle lnlet Outlet Number ofpasses (--) 4
31 Number (--) 1 1 Number ofrows (--) 4
32 Diameter (inch) 5.0470 5.0470 Tubecount H 224
33 Velocity (fl/sec) 10.01 10.01 Tubecount Odd/Even H 561 56
34 R-V-SQ (lblfl-sec2) 5003.1 5003.1 Material Carbon steel
35 Pressure drop (psi) 0.594 0.378 Fin Geornetry
36 Fan Geornetry Type Circular
37 No/bay H 2 Fins/length (fin/in ch) 1 O.O
38 Fan ring type 15 deg Fin root (inch) 1.0000
39 Diameter (11) 10.500 Height (inch) 0.6250
40 Ratio, F anlbundle fa ce a rea H 0.41 Base thickness (inch) 0.0130
41 Driver power (hp) 14.24 Overfin (inch) 2.2500
42 Tip clearance (inch) 0.6250 Efficiency (%) 79.7
43 Efficiency (%) 66.500 Area ratio (finlbare) (--) 21.475
44 Airside Velocities Actual standard Material Aluminum 1 060 - H1 4
45 Face (flimin) 573.62 542.08 Therrnal Resistance, %
46 Maximum (fl/sec) 18.38 17.37 Air 59.71
47 Flow (1 ooo 113/min) 243.93 230.52 Tube 25.25
48 Velocity pressure (inH2O) 0.129 Fouling 12.37
49 Bundle pressure drop (inH2O) 0.303 Metal 2.68
50 Bundle flow fraction H 1.000 Bond 0.00
51 Bundle 94.78 Airside Pressure Drop, % Louvers 0.00
52 Ground clearance 0.00 Fan guard 0.00 Hail screen 0.00
53 Fan ring 5.22 Fan area blockage 0.00 Steam coil 0.00
536 Air-Cooled Heat Exchangers
'l,-----------------------36 --4
ft
'1,-----------18 --4
ft
r
5.833
ft
'>-------------------11.813 ft - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -----'<
@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@~
··················~.·-·~~.•.•.•.•.•.•.•1.·.···································1.•1.•1.•1.·.·············
~ ®®®®®®®®®®®®®®®®®®®®®®®®®®®®®®®®®®®®®®®®®®®®®®®®®®®®®®®®
Air-cooled propane condensers are quite common in the petrochemical industry. Design of an air-cooled unit for the service of
Example 11.11 is considered in the following example.
Example 12.4
100,000 kg/h (220,460 lb/h) of industrial propane at 1751.3 kPa absolute (254 psia) and 70.79ºC (159.42ºF) are to be condensed.
The composition of the stream on a molar basis is 97% propane, 2% ethane, 0.5% n-butane and 0.5% i-butane. A fouling factor of
0.000176 m 2 · K/W (0.001 h · ft2 · ºF/Btu) anda maximum pressure drop of 17.24 kPa (2.5 psi) are specified for the propane
stream. The design ambient air temperature is 95ºF. Use Xace to design an air-cooled condenser for this service and compare the
result with the water-cooled condenser of Example 11.11.
Solution
To obtain an initial configuration for the unit, Xace is first run in classic design mode with input parameters based on the design
guidelines given in this chapter.
(a) Geometry/Unit
Either two or three fans are used per bay, depending on the tube length. The fan diameter is based on a maximum bundle width
of 14 ft.
( c) Geometry/Optional
Free area in hail screen: 80%
A hail screen is specified to protect the tube bundle in a forced-draft unit. It is assumed that a steam coi! will not be required.
( d) Geometry/Bundle
Four runs are made with tube lengths ranging from 42 to 60 ft. Two fans per bay are used for the two shorter Iengths, while
three-fan bays are specified for the longer lengths. Four tube rows constitute a reasonable choice, but other values (3, 5, or 6)
could also be tried. If the number of rows is not specified, Xace genera tes tube bundles with an unusually Iarge number of rows
for this problem.
( e) Geometry/Tube Types/Tube Type 1/ Geometry
Fin type: Circular fin (Default) Fin base thickness: 0.012 in.
Fin density: 10 fin/in. Fin height: 0.625 in.
Material: Aluminum 1100-
annealed (Default)
538 Air-Cooled Heat Exchangers
(g) Process
Note that neither the flow rate nor the outlet temperature of the air is specified here.
(h) Hot fluid properties
Since propane is a defined composition stream, User specified grid is chosen as the physical property input option and
VMGThermo is selected as the property package. The Advanced Peng-Robinson method is used to calculate physical properties.
After selecting the components on the Composition tab, Property sets is chosen as the temperature point method on the
Conditions tab. Four pressure levels are specified (254, 253, 252, and 251 psia) to cover the operating pressure range. At each
leve), a temperature range of 95ºF to 160ºF is specified to cover the entire operating range, and the number of points is set at 20.
The Xace Output Summary for the run with 60 ft tu bes is shown below, from which it is seen that five fan bays are used with a total
of 15 fans. The designs for 48 and 54 ft tubes have six bays, while seven bays are used with 42 ft tubes. Although any of these designs
could be taken as a starting point, the result for 60 ft tubes is chosen here because it has the fewest number of bays.
Air-Cooled Heat Exchangers 539
Xace Output Summary for Example 12.4: Design Run with 60 ft Tubes
Switching to rating mode, the required additional input data are entered from the results of the design run: number of bays
(5), number of tube passes (2), tubes in odd/even rows (67/66), bundle width (14 ft), and tube-side nozzles ( 6 in. schedule 40
inlet, 3 in. schedule 40 outlet). The mass flow rate of air is then adjusted to give an over-design of about 5%; this is done to
provide a consistent basis for comparing alternate designs. The result is listed as Design 1 in the design summary table shown
below.
We next attempt to obtain a more compact design by reducing the number ofbays from five to four. The inlet nozzle size for this
case is increased to 8 in. in arder to accommodate the higher flow rate per bundle. (Alternatively, two smaller inlet nozzles could be
used for each bundle.) With these changes the tube-side pressure drop is found to be about 2.7 psi, which is slightly higher than the
540 Air-Cooled Heat Exchangers
specified maximum of 2.5 psi. A possible remedy is to increase the number of tubes by decreasing the gap between tubes. The
mínimum gap between fin tips recommended by equipment manufacturers is 1/16 in., which in this case corresponds to a trans-
verse pitch of 2.3125 in. This change increases the number of tubes per bundle from 266 to 286 (72/71 tubes in odd/even rows) and
reduces the pressure drop to 2.37 psi, which is acceptable. The number of fans can also be reduced from 12 to 6 by using two
bundles per bay. The Output Summary for this case, which is designated Design 2, is given below.
Xace Output Summary for Example 12.4: Rating Run for Design 2
The size of the exchanger can be further reduced at the expense of additional fan power by reducing the tube length. With
a length of 54 ft, for example, the total power requirement increases from 236 to 371 hp; this case is designated Design 3. The
number of fans could be halved in this case as well by utilizing bays with two tube bundles. Further reducing the tube length to 50 ft
Air-Cooled Heat Exchangers 541
increases the total fan power to nearly 550 hp. It seems unlikely that this case would be economical unless plot space considerations
restricted the size of the unit. However, economic data are needed to select an optima! design.
The following table compares key attributes of air-cooled and water-cooled units for this service.
Clearly, the air-cooled condenser requires much more heat-transfer area due to the low air-side heat-transfer coefficient. Also,
notice that the cross-flow arrangement in the air cooler results in a lower mean temperature difference. While the operating cost of
an air cooler tends to be lower than that of a water-cooled unit, the operating cost is still quite significant. These units have sizable
power requirements (about 100-370 hp for the designs in this example), not to mention the maintenance of ali the motors and
drive trains.
Ali designs have 14 ft wide tube bundles with 4 tube rows and 2 passes. The carbon steel tubes
are 1 in. 00, 13 BWG with embedded (G-fin) type 1100 annealed aluminum fins. Fins are
0.625 in. high with a density of 10 fpi. Ali cases employ plug-type box headers and forced-draft
operation. Nozzle specifications are tentative pending mechanical design calculations.
542 Air-Cooled Heat Exchangers
~ - - - ~ - - - -::-
/
_
:
~ - - - ~ - -:-
1 :
. - - - ~- - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - __ .: - - - . : ' : . - - - - ~- - - -- - -- - .,'_ - - - - - - -'- - -- .
-j-
r
14,104
t 1 1 t 1 1 1 1 1 1 t
· ·---¡-------r-----·····;;····· 1 ·····r······-··,:·······,···· ·
' ' , ' ' ' ,
', •. ,.1 .. ,-'' ', -!. '--- .. !,,,--'
,, . r~:, .
' ' ' : 1: '
, • - - - ~ - - - - - - - ~ - - - - - - - - _ _ :_ - - - - _ : ' : _ - - - - ~ - - - - - - - - _ .,'_ - - - - - - - '- - - - • 1
,, . r~:,.. ..,
' ' ' : 1 : /
J. _;·_-j-.-:..:-_·:}-··-·--·i-:-..:.·::_J .::..:-.J·_--·--·--F·..:.-:-j:·..:.:. _··:-
\ : ... i-··-··-/········\-··-¡ ! ¡·····f-···-··-·\··-····,···-:
, •. 1... '---~. 1.J.-- 1
,, . :~·,
.• ,
1 , , : 1: ,
J. - _:-:j:-..:.-:·~·.:--·--·-·F·..:.·::_J .::..:-_·:..:\.--·--·--.i-:·..:.·:-j:·..:.:. _·,.
'' ' ; / ' 1 ; ••• ; '
' ,
', •.•• 1_.. ,, .L .. L.
~i~~--------------~--------------~~i~
.L .~.·~· , .L
: 1
: 1 \ / 1
1 1 :
- .. - - .. ~ - - -,.¡ ... ~-~-----" - .. - - .. 1~ - -
1 , / : 1 / 1
...... ) / ! 1 •••••••••••••••••• : ••••••••••• ) ••••••• ,
_..,__ -.--- .l--'- ·r-- ,__._
- - - - • - T •• - • - - - - - - •• • 1. - - ~ - - - - - - - • - • • -----------'---'r-------------T·-----
! \ ! \
1
··- .. '. ..
~¡~'k----------------~----------------~¡~
Air-Cooled Heat Exchangers 543
References
[1] Kraus AD, Az.iz A, Welty J. Extended Surtace Heat Transfer. New York: Wiley; 2001.
[2] Hewitt GE, Shires GL, Bott TR. Process Heat Transfer. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 1994.
[3] Minton PE. Heat exchanger design. In: McKetta JJ, editor. Heat Transfer Design Methods. New York: Marcel Dekker; 1991.
[4] Bell KJ, Mueller AC. Wolverine Engineering Data Book 11. Wolverine Tube, lnc; 2001. www.wlv.com.
[5] Anonymous. Engineering Data Book. 11th ed. Tulsa, OK: Gas Processors Suppliers Association; 1998.
[6] Mukherjee R. Effectively design air-cooled heat exchangers. Chem. Eng. Prog. 1987;93(No. 2):26-47.
[7] Shipes KV. Air-cooled exchangers in cold climates. Chem. Eng. Prog 1974;70(No. 7):53-8.
[8] Briggs DE, Young EH. Convection heat transfer and pressure drop of air flowing across triangular pitch banks of finned tubes. Chem. Eng. Prog. Symp. Ser
1963;59(No. 41 ):1-1 O.
[9] Ganguli A, Tung SS, Taborek J. Parametric study of air-cooled heat exchanger finned tube geometry. AIChE Symp. Ser 1985;81(No. 245):122-8.
[10] Króger DG. Air-Cooled Heat Exchangers and Cooling Towers. New York: distributed by Begell House, lnc; 1998.
[11] Robinson KK, Briggs DE. Pressure drop of air flowing across triangular pitch banks of finned tubes. Chem. Eng Prog. Symp. Ser 1965;62(No. 64):177-84.
[12] Taborek J. Mean temperature difference. In: Heat Exchanger Design Handbook, Vol. 1. New York: Hemisphere Publishing Corp.; 1988.
[13] Roetzel W, Neubert J. Calculation of mean temperature difference in air-cooled cross-flow heat exchangers. J. Heat Transfer 1979;101 :511-3.
When the outlet temperatures ofboth streams are known, the lower charts can be used to obtain the LMTD correction factor in
the usual manner. When the outlet temperatures are unknown but the product UA is known, the upper charts can be used to obtain
e, from which the mean temperature difference, t.Tm, can be found. The exchanger duty is then obtained as q = UAt.Tm, and the
outlet temperatures are computed using the energy balances on the two streams.
The equations from which the charts were constructed are given by Taborek [ 12]. Unfortunately, sorne of the equations contain
errors; therefore, the original sources listed in Ref. [12) should be consulted if the equations are to be used. An alternative
computational method is given in Ref. [13) and is reproduced in Ref. [10). Although approximate, this method is well suited for
computer calculations. Neither the exact nor the approximate method is convenient for hand calculations. Therefore, only the charts
are presented here.
R
_
-e -
_S_ _ (Í )¡ -(Í
1 1)0
1 (Í2}0 - (\)¡
í 1 and í2 are not interchangeable
-------+- NTU2 = AU/C2
0.9
1.2
0.8
1.4
0.7
1.6
0.6
1.8
0.5 2.0
0.4
0.3
0.2 5.0
0.1
0.9
0.8
0.7
LL
0.6
0.4
FIGURE 12.A.1 Mean temperature difference relationships for cross flow: three tube rows and one tube pass (Source: Ref [12]).
Air-Cooled Heat Exchangers 545
R
_
-e -
s.__ (Í1); - (Í1)0
1 (\)0-(\)¡
í1 and í2 are not interchangeable
-------.. NTU2 = AU/C2
1.0
0.9
0.8
0.7
1.6
0.6
~
~él~ 0.5 1 1 1 J \( \ .r\ .1\ )!h"k''vf<, 'k'i~
- NStsl>f' _l--L 1 ~:~
t:..
"'
0.4
, r
JI: .'\: t _, - h -,~ - ,k\'
, .l.".,R
. , -"t~t:":k
- - r~'k-·iq~¿---_
~ 12.5
3.0
0.3
-
0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0
1.0
\-
" !\ \ ~
r--~
. ~ -
::::::::::
'\ ~ ~ ~ ~ ::::-- ------ F:::: ~
- - -
........____
r---
--.... ........____ -1-f""o 1
.~
¡---.._._
0.9 --.... --....
\ r-.
~\
"--,O·T~
~ !'-"- " ~ ~
0.8 ~ ~ ~~~ "'
~
\\
'- ~ ~ ~
"" ""'
·,.:,-
\
i \\ \ 1\ ¡\ \ I'\ i'\ 1\ ¡\
\
0.7 >--
!
- --·- -·--- -- Jj_ \\ f\ \ \ \ [\ Í\
\
\
LL ~ \ \ \\ \ [\ \ !\ o.,,.
0.6 >---~
1
11 : \ \ \ \ \
{+- 1 \ \ \ \ \
0.5 ·- t--- f- -- ~ \ \ \ \ ~\
---
\ \ \ \ \ \ \
0.4 - ~:o
11
\ \ \ \
\ \ \
0.3
- ~o-
1
- - -6-~- -~ ,___f')_
1 1 1 'f
_ ["
o
1
.!.
>-oo
1
1
f-:-'°
(J)
1
>--t-
~
"'- ~f¡7~- -~1 -~
1
(J)
o.o 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0
FIGURE 12.A.2 Mean temperature difference relationships far cross flow: tour tube rows and one tube pass (Source: Ref. [12]).
546 Air-Cooled Heat Exchangers
t
(e , , :::: r ,
R=c:-=~-~-
C2 (T1); - (T1)0 _ 1 1 1 1 >)
1 (T2)0- (T2); t
T1 and T2 are not interchangeable
-NTU2 = AU/C2
0.9
<l
~
\-El\::..
1
,--:
t:::
º·'I 1\ t~ :- f-JlJ;:
0.2 1 '1 , · , t ' , 1 ,· ,y,·-- \~-- ~-
'· f l¡,-;¡
- _?,,- I· -- 1:\- h---h.- i''Cl ",I _.::,... 1 "'(f ~t:.'l.-'t-\\'115.o
4.0
0.1
0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0
1.0 -- ,
\ !"-. l~r-----; r--::::: ~ .:::;;;::: r--.:: r-:;:::-- ~ . ---::,K
' \ \ '\ ~' í\.'-" , ~~~):: ~~· ~ ~,
1
h
<?'°
0.9
' J ' \ [\ '\l
=-T·:_
\
\ \ \ __ J\¡ ' +\ 1
--
0.8
0.7
~--
--· -
' \r ·- l
-\L --X '\\ . ~-1Vt 1 1
LL 1--- --
__ __
,
C---J~- - \1 \ ·-
1
i- -7-
1
__ i_
0.6 ··-
--- --- >--
o
:, .
0.5 -
..
!
o
¡_,,
,_ L--'JJ-··
0.4 ···- - - -- - --- t- ---
'f 1 "'11
0.3
1 1
o.o 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0
FIGURE 12.A.3 Mean temperature difference relationships for cross flow: three tube rows and three tube passes (Source: Ref. [12]).
Air-Cooled Heat Exchangers 547
-----,
(e
t
1
• (Ío}a l
1
• ...
~(Í1);
_
1.
~
R = C2 = (í1); - (í1)0
e;-
0 t t t
~
(í2)0- (í2)¡ t (Í2); (Í1)0
í 1 and í 2 are not interchangeable
- NTU2 = AU/C2
0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6
1.0
0.9
1.2
0.8
0.7 1.4
1.6
\-
<l
~¡~- 1
0.6
1.8
,-"" 0.5
¿ 2.0
11
"' 0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0
1.0
0.9
0.8
0.7
u..
0.6
0.5
0.4
(Í2)0 - (Í2);
P=
(í1)i- (í2)i
FIGURE 12.A.4 Mean temperature difference relationships far cross flow: tour tube rows and tour tube passes (Source: Ref. [12]).
548 Air-Cooled Heat Exchangers
t (T2)0
1.0
0.2 0.3 0.4 Q_5_ 0.8 o.o
,' ,, , 1.0
' ,' ,,
,' , ,,
,, ,,
0.9 , , ,,
,, ,,
,, , ,, 1 .,,11.2
0.8 , ,
,, ,, _,,
0.7 1.4
~ 1.6
l-
1--
<I
~
1
-""'
0.6
1.8
¿: 0.5
11
"" 0.4
0.3
~f<~:r¿t~f:~g~]~;;f9\;~2{:t;J~~
2
º- ·', .,, ']), - , .••_.,. ~- _ ••• - - - - -- - - - ' 1 6'"
5.0
0.1
o.o
o.o 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0
1.0 ..., 1
"'" ".....__--....; f:;: ::3::: ~ ..:::- ~ •... r---; ,...._ t-- -r-- r--.... R_,,
0. 7 ..•
\ \ ~ !"'-- ..•..•....
0.9
\ \ ~~ t'- " !'s.
r-----.:
~ i:::---- k'r-
""' \
1\
"!'\' I'\
o
0.8
\ ' ' Í\ \
'
1\ \1\
0.7
\ 1\ 1\ !\ \ ' 1\ , \ I\
1 \ \ \ ' \ ' \
LL
0.6
\ 1 \ \l \ \
\ \i \ 1 \
0.5
\ ~
,, \, 1
o
:, .
'1
o
0.4 :o , ""
c-r r-r-
11 11
- -~- ~g;-6- "' ~ ~
t-a-co-o,- :,.- -N- -~- -9-9
o
0.3
1 1 11 11 11 1 1 1 11 1
o.o 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0
(T 2)0 - (T 2);
P=
(T1);-(\l;
FIGURE 12.A.5 Mean temperature difference relationships for cross flow: four tube rows, two tube passes, two rows per pass, tube-side fluid mixed
al return header (Source: Ref. [12]).
Air-Cooled Heat Exchangers 549
The variation of pressure with altitud e in the atmosphere depends on the lapse rate, which is the rate of decrease of temperature with
altitude. For an isothermal atmosphere ( zero lapse rate ), the pressure ( and, hence, the density) decreases exponentially with altitude
according to the following equation:
~=~=~[~~~~]
~ ~ IT
(12.C.1)
where
Assuming Po is essentially one atmosphere, Equation ( 12.C.1) gives the air density at any elevation in terms of the density, p0, at one
atmosphere.
Example 12.C.1
Estimate the density of dry air at l00ºF andan elevation of 3500 ft.
Solution
Equation (12.C.1) is used with T = l00ºF = 560ºR and z = 3500 ft.
p =
- exp [-M(g/gc)z]
_ = exp [-29(1.0)
------ X 3500]
= 0.8893
Po RT 1545 x 560
From Table A.5, the density of air at l00ºF and 1 atm is Po = 0.0709 lbrn/ft". Hence,
Notations
Specific gravity
T Temperature
u Overall heat-transfer coefficient
Uc Clean overall heat-transfer coefficient
Uo Design overall heat-transfer coefficient
u.¿ Required overall heat-transfer coefficient
V Fluid velocity
V¡ace Air face velocity
V¡ace, ave Air face velocity based on average air temperature
V¡ace, std Air face velocity based on standard conditions (70ºF, 1 atm)
V¡, Velocity of air leaving fan ring
Vmax Maximum velocity of air in tube bundle
w Width of tube bundle
W¡an Fan brake power
Wmotor Power delivered by motor
Wused Power used by motor
Greek Letters
Fin thickness
Viscosity correction factor
Effective height of annular fin
Problems
(12.1) For Example 12.1:
(a) Repeat step (k) using Equation (2.38) to calculate the tube-side heat-transfer coefficient.
(b) Repeat step (1) using Equation (12.1) to calculate the air-side heat-transfer coefficient.
(c) Repeat step (t) using Equation (12.9) to calculate the air-side friction factor.
Compare the results of the above calculations with those obtained in Examples 12.1 through 12.3.
(12.2) Designan air-cooled heat exchanger for the service of Problem 5.6. Use the properties of dry air at one atmosphere pressure
and assume an ambient air temperature of l00ºF for design purposes. The air-side pressure loss should not exceed 0.5 in.
H2O. The unit will be mounted at grade and there are no space limitations at the plant site.
(12.3) Designan air-cooled heat exchanger for the service of Problem 5.11. Use the properties of dry air at one atmosphere pressure
and assume an ambient air temperature of 95ºF for design purposes. The air-side pressure loss should not exceed 0.5 in.
H2O. Assume that the unit will be mounted at grade and that there are no space limitations at the site.
(12.5) Designan air-cooled heat exchanger for the service of Problem 5.23. The unit will be situated on the US Gulf Coast (a
relatively corrosive environment). Design ambient air temperature is 95ºF and the maximum air-side pressure loss is 0.5 in.
H2O. Assume that the unit will be mounted at grade and that there are no space limitations at the site. Properties of the
hydrocarbon stream are given in Problem 7.20.
(12.7) A stream consisting of 275,000 lb/h of a hydrocarbon liquid at 200ºF is to be cooled to 130ºF in an air-cooled heat
exchanger. Four induced-draft fan bays are available on the used equipment lot. Each bay contains a single tube bundle
having four rows oftubes with 45 tubes per row arranged fortwo passes. The root tubes are 1-in. 00, 14 BWG and are made
of carbon steel. The tubes contain nine aluminum fins per inch with a height of 0.5 in.andan average thickness of 0.012 in.
The tubes are laid out on 2.25-in. equilateral triangular pitch. Two of the bays each contain 24 ft long tubes and two 7.5 ft
diameter fans equipped with 10 hp motors. The other two bays each contain 16 ft long tubes and two 6 ft diameter fans
equipped with 7.5 hp motors. Design specifications include maximum pressure drops of 10 psi on the tube side and 0.5 in.
H2O on the air side.
Average properties of the hydrocarbon are as follows:
Use HEXTRAN or other suitable software to determine if the existing heat exchangers are suitable for this service and if so, how
they should be arranged. For the calculations, use dry air at one atmosphere pressure and an ambient air temperature of 9 5° F.
(12.8) (a) For the service of Example 12.1, run each of the following computer programs in design mode.
(i) HEXTRAN
(ii) Xace
(b) Based on the results obtained in part (a), develop a final design for the heat exchanger using each ofthe computer
programs and compare the results with the design obtained by hand in Example 12.1.
(12.12) Designan air-cooled condenser for the service of Problem 11.26 using Xace. The elevation at the plant site is 1500 ft and
ambient air at a temperature of 98ºF with a relative humidity of 40% should be used for design purposes. The air-side
pressure loss should not exceed 0.5 in. H2O.
( 12.13) Designan air-cooled condenser for the service of Problem 11.28 usingXace. Design conditions are the same as in Problem
12.12.
(12.14) Designan air-cooled condenser for the service of Problem 11.37 usingXace. Design conditions are as specified in Problem
12.12.
(12.15) Designan air-cooled condenser for the service of Problem 11.38 using Xace. The elevation at the plant site is 2500 ft and
ambient air at a temperature of 95ºF with a relative humidity of 40% should be used for design purposes. The air-side
pressure loss should not exceed 0.5 in. H2O.
TABLE A.1 Properties of Metallic Elements
Elementª
200 K
-73ºC
273 K
0ºC
Thermal Conductivity k (W/m · K)b
400 K
127ºC
600 K
327ºC
800 K
527ºC
1000 K
727ºC
1200 K
927ºC p (kg/rn")
Properties at 293 K (20 ºC)
e (J/kg · K) k(W/m · K)
a X 10 6
2
(m /s)
Melting
Temperature (K)
-l=-
'i::I
'i::I
CD
Aluminum
Antimony
237
30.2
236
25.5
240
21.2
232
18.2
220
16.8
2702
6684
896
208
236
24.6
97.5
17.7
933
904 =
c.
Beryllium 301 218 161 126 107 89 73 1850 1750 205 63.3 1550 ><'
Bismuth"
Boron"
9.7
52.5
8.2
31.7 18.7 11.3 8.1 6.3 5.2
9780
2500
124
1047
7.9
28.6
6.51
10.9
545
2573
l=-
Cadmium': 99.3 97.5 94.7 8650 231 97 48.5 594 -t
Cesium
Chromium
36.8
111
36.1
94.8 87.3 80.5 71.3 65.3 62.4
1873
7160
230
440
36
91.4
83.6
29.0
302
2118
=-•••
CD
Cobalt"
Copper
122
413
104
401
84.8
392 383 371 357 342
8862
8933
389
383
100
399
29.0
116.6
1765
1356
3
Q
'i::I
Germanium
Gold
96.8
327
66.7
318
43.2
312
27.3
304
19.8
292
17.4
278
17.4
262
5360
19300 129
61.6
316 126.9
1211
1336 =-
'<
Hafnium 24.4 23.3 22.3 21.3 20.8 20.7 20.9 13280 23.1 2495 S!?.
C")
Indium 89.7 83.7 74.5 7300 82.2 430
.-•••,,
D)
lridium 153 148 144 138 132 126 120 22500 134 147 48.8 2716
!ron 94 83.5 69.4 54.7 43.3 32.6 28.2 7870 452 81.1 22.8 1810
Lead 36.6 35.5 33.8 31.2 11340 129 35.3 24.1 601 Q
Lithium 88.1 79.2 72.1 534 3391 77.4 42.7 454 'i::I
Magnesium 159 157 153 149 146 1740 1017 156 88.2 923 CD
Mangan ese 7.17 7.68 7290 486 7.78 2.2 1517 ::i
Mercury" 28.9 13546 234 ci'
en
Molybdenum
Nickel
Niobium
143
106
52.6
139
94
53.3
134
80.1
55.2
126
65.5
58.2
118
67.4
61.3
112
71.8
64.4
105
76.1
67.5
10240
8900
8570
251
446
270
138
91
53.6
53.7
22.9
23.2
2883
1726
2741 -
Q
Palladium
Platinum
Potassium
Rhenium
Rhodium
75.5
72.4
104
51
154
75.5
71.5
104
48.6
151
75.5
71.6
52
46.1
146
75.5
73.0
44.2
136
75.5
75.5
44.1
127
75.5
78.6
44.6
121
82.6
45.7
115
12020
21450
860
21100
12450
247
133
741
137
248
75.5
71.4
103
48.1
150
25.4
25.0
161.6
16.6
48.6
1825
2042
337
3453
2233
-
3:
D)
CD
::::!.
D)
cñ
Rubidium 58.9 58.3 1530 348 58.2 109.3 312
Silicon 264 168 98.9 61.9 42.2 31.2 25.7 2330 703 153 93.4 1685
Silver 403 428 420 405 389 374 358 10500 234 427 173.8 1234
Sodium 138 135 971 1206 133 113.6 371
Tantalum 57.5 57.4 57.8 58.6 59.4 60.2 61 16600 138 57.5 25.1 3269
Tinc 73.3 68.2 62.2 5750 227 67.0 51.3 505
Titanium" 24.5 22.4 20.4 19.4 19.7 20.7 22 4500 611 22.0 8.0 1953
Tungsten" 197 182 162 139 128 121 115 19300 134 179 69.2 3653
Uranium'' 25.1 27 29.6 34 38.8 43.9 49 19070 113 27.4 12.7 1407
Vanadium 31.5 31.3 32.1 34.2 36.3 38.6 41.2 6100 502 31.4 10.3 2192
Zinc 123 122 116 105 7140 385 121 44.0 693
Zirconium" 25.2 23.2 21.6 20.7 21.6 23.7 25.7 6570 272 22.8 12.8 2125
Aluminum
Duralumin 94-96 Al, 3-5 Cu, trace Mg 2787 833 164 6.676
Silumin 87 Al, 13 Si 2659 871 164 7.099
Copper
Aluminum bronze 95 Cu, 5 Al 8666 410 83 2.330
Bronze 75 Cu, 25 Sn 8666 343 26 0.859
Red brass 85 Cu, 9 Sn, 5 Zn 8714 385 61 1.804
Brass 70 Cu, 30 Zn 8522 385 111 3.412
German silver 62 Cu, 15 Ni, 22 Zn 8618 394 24.9 0.733
Constantan 60 Cu, 40 Ni 8922 410 22.7 0.612
lton
Cast iron -4C 7272 420 52 1.702
Wrought iron 7849 460 59 1.626
Steel
Carbon steel 1 c 7801 473 43 1.172
1.s c 7753 486 36 0.970
Chrome steel 1 Cr 7865 460 61 1.665
5 Cr 7833 460 40 1.110
10 Cr 7785 460 31 0.867
Chrome-nickel steel 15 Cr, 10 Ni 7865 460 19 0.526
20 Cr, 15 Ni 7833 460 15.1 0.415
Nickel steel 10 Ni 7945 460 26 0.720
20Ni 7993 460 19 0.526
40 Ni 8169 460 10 0.279
60 Ni 8378 460 19 0.493
Nickel-chrome steel 80 Ni, 15 Cr 8522 460 17 0.444
60 Ni, 15 Cr 8266 460 12.8 0.333
40 Ni, 15 Cr 8073 460 11.6 0.305
20 Ni, 15 Cr 7865 460 14.0 0.390
Manganese steel 1 Mn 7865 460 so 1.388
5 Mn 7849 460 22 0.637
Silicon steel 1 Si 7769 460 42 1.164
5 Si 7417 460 19 0.555
Stainless steel Type 304 7817 461 14.4 0.387
Type 347 7817 461 14.3 0.387
Tungsten steel lW 7913 448 66 1.858
SW 8073 435 54 1.525
Substance Temperature (ºC) k (W/m · ºC) p (kg/rn '] e (kJ/kg· ºC) ax 107 (m2/s)
Substance Temperature ( ºC) k (W/m · ºC) p (kg/m3) e (kJ/kg· ºC) ax 107 (m2/s)
( Continued)
558 Thermophysical Properties of Materials
Substance Temperature ( ºC) k (W/m · ºC) p (kg/rn ") c(kJ/kg· ºC) ax 107 (m2/s)
T
(3 X 103 Cp a X 106 /1 X 106 V X106 g(3/v2 X 10-8
(K) ( ºC) p (kg/m") (1/K) (J/kg · K) k(W/m · K) (m2/s) (N·s/m2) (m2/s) Pr (1/K · m3)
273 o 1.252 3.66 1011 0.0237 19.2 17.456 13.9 0.71 1.85
293 20 1.164 3.41 1012 0.0251 22.0 18.240 15.7 0.71 1.36
313 40 1.092 3.19 1014 0.0265 24.8 19.123 17.6 0.71 1.01
333 60 1.025 3.00 1017 0.0279 27.6 19.907 19.4 0.71 0.782
353 80 0.968 2.83 1019 0.0293 30.6 20.790 21.5 0.71 0.600
373 100 0.916 2.68 1022 0.0307 33.6 21.673 23.6 0.71 0.472
473 200 0.723 2.11 1035 0.0370 49.7 25.693 35.5 0.71 0.164
573 300 0.596 1.75 1047 0.0429 68.9 39.322 49.2 0.71 0.0709
673 400 o.sos 1.49 1059 0.0485 89.4 32.754 64.6 0.72 0.0350
773 500 0.442 1.29 1076 0.0540 113.2 35.794 81.0 0.72 0.0193
1273 1000 0.268 0.79 1139 0.0762 240 48.445 181 0.74 0.00236
T 3
--- (3 X 10 Cp IX X104 µ, X 10
6
V X10 6 g(3/v2 X 10-6
(K) ( ºC) p (kg/rn '] (1/K) (J/kg · K) k(W/m · K) (m2/s) (N · s/m2) (m2/s) Pr (1/K · m3)
T
--- (3 X 104 IX X106 µ, X 106 V X 106 g(3/v2 X 10-9
(K) ( ºC) p (kg/m
3
) (1/K) Cp (J/kg · K) k (W/m · K) (m2/s) (N · s/rn ") (m2/s) Pr (1/K · m3)