Association of Vaginal Infections in Preterm Labour: Srilakshmi Yarlagadda, Sajana G., Prasuna J. L. Narra
Association of Vaginal Infections in Preterm Labour: Srilakshmi Yarlagadda, Sajana G., Prasuna J. L. Narra
Association of Vaginal Infections in Preterm Labour: Srilakshmi Yarlagadda, Sajana G., Prasuna J. L. Narra
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20182030
Original Research Article
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Dr. Pinnamaneni Siddhartha Institute of Medical Sciences and Research
Foundation, Chinoutapally, Krishna, Andhra Pradesh, India
*Correspondence:
Dr. Srilakshmi Yarlagadda,
E-mail: ysiri531@gmail.com
Copyright: © the author(s), publisher and licensee Medip Academy. This is an open-access article distributed under
the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial
use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
ABSTRACT
Background: Preterm labour is defined as onset of regular uterine contractions associated with cervical changes
between 28-37 completed weeks of gestation. Prematurity is the cause of 85% neonatal morbidity and mortality.
Preterm labour has multiple etiologies. Vaginal infections have been associated with increased risk for preterm
labour. Screening for genitourinary infections antenatally, especially in high risk cases, prompt recognition and
treatment decrease the incidence of preterm labour.
Methods: Ours was a prospective and retrospective observational study done at Dr. Pinnamaneni Siddhartha Institute
of Medical Sciences and Research Foundation from April 2016 to February 2018 in the Department of Obstetrics and
Gynaecology. The aim is to study the association of vaginal infections in preterm labour. A total of 116 women in
preterm labor were studied. After clinical examination, CBP, CUE, Ultrasound, urine culture and sensitivity were
done. Vaginal swab was taken from posterior fornix and sent for culture and sensitivity and gram staining .Culture
and sensitivity were done in the Department of Microbiology at our Institute.
Results: Out of 116 women in preterm labour, urinary tract infection was seen in 27.58% women. E. Coli was the
commonest microorganism isolated in urine (15.51%). Vaginal infections were seen in 33.62% women. Candida was
the commonest microorganism isolated in HVS cultures.
Conclusions: Screening for genitourinary infections in pregnancy is necessary, especially in high risk cases. Early
detection and prompt treatment of genitourinary infections decrease the incidence of preterm labor, thereby
decreasing the neonatal morbidity and mortality associated with prematurity.
an increased risk of preterm delivery. 30-40% of all cases factors in index pregnancy including genitourinary and
of preterm birth are induced because of maternal or fetal respiratory infections, GDM, anaemia, hypertensive
complications. The remaining 60-70% are likely due to disorders, heart disease or any other medical disease,
subclinical infective or inflammatory causes, especially obstetric risks like hydramnios, multifetal gestation,
genitourinary tract, cervical dysfunction, multiple malpresentation and uterine anomalies.
gestations, idiopathic and possible social, environmental
and nutritional interactions.3 A thorough systemic and obstetric examination was done.
Speculum examination was done to visualise cervix and
The most serious outcome of preterm labour is often vagina and to rule out cervical and vaginal infections.
associated with adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes
related to infection.4 Prostaglandins which are released Per vaginal examination was done to note cervical length
because of infection stimulate uterine contractions and dilatation. CBP, CUE, Obstetric Ultrasound for
leading to preterm labour. Preventive measures can cervical length, AFI, EFW, placental localisation and
prevent preterm labour and adverse neonatal outcome. separation were done.
So, the present study was undertaken to study the role of Swab from the posterior fornix of vagina was taken and
vaginal infections in preterm labour. The main objective sent for gram staining and culture sensitivity. Midstream
is to study the association of vaginal infections in preterm urine sample was sent for culture and sensitivity.
labour.
Microbiological analysis and antimicrobial sensitivity
METHODS testing of urine and high vaginal swab were done in the
Department of Microbiology at our institute. All patients
This was a prospective and retrospective observational were monitored for features of sepsis like fever, maternal
study done at Dr. Pinnamaneni Siddhartha Institute of tachycardia, uterine tenderness and foul smelling vaginal
Medical Sciences and Research Foundation from April discharge.
2016 to Feb 2018 in the Department of Obstetrics and
Gynecology. The NICU at our hospital is well equipped Since this study comes under descriptive statistics, results
and considering the facilities available in it, 28 weeks were analysed by calculating percentages.
was taken as the lower limit for the period of viability in
the present study. RESULTS
Pregnant women between 28-37 weeks of gestation who In the present study, out of 2040 pts who delivered
set into spontaneous preterm labour only were included in beyond 28 weeks between April 2016-Feb 2018, 116
the present study. Gestational age was assessed basing on women presented in preterm labour. The incidence of
the last menstrual period and dating scan. preterm labour at our institute was 5.68 %.
Written informed consent was obtained from enrolled In the present study, 21.55% were primigravidas, 23.27%
women. Detailed history was taken with respect to age, were second gravidas, 39.65% were third gravidas and
parity, socioeconomic status, residence, previous 15.51% were fourth gravidas.
pregnancy outcomes and for the presence of any risk
International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology Volume 7 · Issue 6 Page 2175
Yarlagadda S et al. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Jun;7(6):2174-2179
56.89% were booked cases at our institute, but they had 32.75% in the present study had previous history of one
irregular antenatal checkups. 43.10% were unbooked (or) more preterm deliveries. 10.34% had previous one
cases. preterm delivery, 14.65% had previous 2 preterm
deliveries and 7.75% had previous 3 preterm deliveries. It
Table 4: Socioeconomic status (SES). has significant association with PTL in index pregnancy.
International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology Volume 7 · Issue 6 Page 2176
Yarlagadda S et al. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Jun;7(6):2174-2179
Other microorganisms isolated were Klebsiella, Candida, multigravidas. In the study done by Singh U et al, 47%
Acinetobacter and Staphylococcus aureus. were primigravidas and 53% were multigravidas.7 Also,
in a study conducted by Etuk SJ et al, 41.94% were
Table 11: Bacteriological profile in vaginal samples primigravidas and 58.06% were multigravidas.11 The
increased incidence of preterm labour in multigravidas in
No. of HVS the present study could be because more number of
Microorganism %
samples younger women conceived with low interconception
Candida 36 31.03 interval, malnutrition, anemia and genito-urinary
Staphylococcus infections.
1 0.86
aureus
Mixed microbes 2 1.72 In the present study, 56.89% were booked cases and
Sterile 77 66.37 43.1% were unbooked cases. Though 56.89% were
booked cases at our institution, they didn’t come for
Vaginal infection was seen in 33.62% cases which was regular antenatal checkups and so complications like
significant. Candida was the commonest microorganism anemia, UTI, genital infections, hypertensive disorders
(31.03%) seen in HVS cultures. Other organisms isolated were more in them leading to preterm labour. 40.51%
were Staphylococcus aureus and mixed microbes. belonged to lower socioeconomic status and 37.06% to
lower middle class. Because malnutrition, anemia and
DISCUSSION increased chances of infections were more in these
women, the incidence of preterm labour was also high
In the present study, out of 2040 patients who delivered among them.
beyond 28 weeks between April 2016-Feb 2018, 116
cases presented in preterm labour. The incidence of In the present study, 44.82% had underweight and
preterm labour at our institute was 5.68%. This is in close majority (70.69%) lived in rural areas. The incidence of
agreement to the world-wide incidence of preterm labour. anemia, malnutrition and genitourinary infections was
also high in these women which might have led to
Fernandes F et al reported an incidence of preterm labour preterm labour
at 7.81% in their study.5 Beck S et al reported an
incidence of 6 to 11% and Copper et al reported at 7 to Past obstetric history
11%.2,6 However, Uma S et al in their study reported the
incidence of preterm labour as 22%.7 The varied In the present study, it was observed that 38.79% had
incidence in different studies may be due to differences in previous h/o abortion and 32.75% had previous h/o
socioeconomic status, literacy and awareness of antenatal preterm delivery which were significant.
care among the pregnant women.
In the study by Fernandes F et al 35% had previous h/o
Age abortions and 12.11% had previous h/o preterm births.5 In
a case control study done in Iraq by Samim A et al.8 15%
Majority of women were in teenage in the present study had h/o previous pretermbirths. In the study by Kiran P et
(32.75%). 22.41% were between 22-25years. Extremes of al.12 14.4% had previous h/o preterm births and 14.4%
age group accounted for 41.37% cases. This is in had previous h/o abortions.
comparison with the study done by Samim A et al in Iraq,
2006, who reported that 36.5% of cases of preterm labour Risk factors for preterm in index pregnancy
were in extremes of reproductive age group.8 In the study
by Fernandes F et al.5 15.8% were in extremes of age Out of 116 women who delivered preterm in the present
group and 18.8% were in extreme age group in the study study, it was observed that 86 women (74.13%) had one
done by Renay Weiner et al in Kenya.9 This difference or more risk factors.
could be because more teenage and elder women were
present in the present study. Vaginal infections were noted in 33.62% women in the
present study. The commonest organism isolated in HVS
Gravida cultures was Candida species. The other organisms were
Staphylococcus aureus and mixed microbes.
In the present study, 21.55% were primigravida and
78.44% were multigravidas. In the study done by Pradeep Raju S et al the incidence of
vaginal infections was 58.06% in women with preterm
In a longitudinal case series examining demographic and labour.13 Incidence of vaginal infections was high when
obstetric data of 17493 deliveries conducted in a referral compared to the study conducted by Fernandes F et al
centre in Israel by Shlomo E et al, preterm delivery rate who reported an incidence of 8.29%.5 Samim A et al
was higher in grand multipara (93% among reported an incidence of 7.24% of women with vaginal
grandmultipara).10 In the study by Fernandes F. et al.5 infection in preterm labour.8 UTI was noted in 27.58% of
45.11% were primigravidas and 54.39% were cases. The commonest organism isolated was E. Coli
International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology Volume 7 · Issue 6 Page 2177
Yarlagadda S et al. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Jun;7(6):2174-2179
International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology Volume 7 · Issue 6 Page 2178
Yarlagadda S et al. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Jun;7(6):2174-2179
13. Pradeep S, Pallavi P, Navatha B, Krishna L.Vaginal 15. Taskeen R. Preterm delivery. A major predictor of
infections and its relation to preterm labor, PPROM, perinatal morbidity and mortality. JPMI.
PROM and its outcome. Int J Reprod Contracept 2006;20:279-83
Obstet Gynecol. 2015;4:1422-6.
14. Shresta S, Dangol SS, Shresta M, Shresta RPB. Cite this article as: Yarlagadda S, Sajana G, Narra
Outcome of preterm babies and associated risk PJL. Association of vaginal infections in Preterm
factors in a hospital. J Nepal Med Assoc. labour. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol
2010;50:286-90. 2018;7:2174-9.
International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology Volume 7 · Issue 6 Page 2179