Giant Bladder Stone: A Case Report and Review of The Literature
Giant Bladder Stone: A Case Report and Review of The Literature
Giant Bladder Stone: A Case Report and Review of The Literature
02603
189
GENERAL UROLOGY
Case Report
ABSTRACT
Bladder stones comprise 5% of urinary tract stones. Generally, they occur in the presence of bladder neck
obstruction, urinary tract infections associated with neurogenic bladder and foreign objects. They are more
common among men than women. Infection stones comprise approximately 15% of urinary tract stones. A
giant bladder stone is a rare finding in contemporary urological practice. The general clinical setting is re-
current urinary tract infections, hematuria and urinary retention. We performed an open cystolithotomy on a
mentally impaired patient who had a giant bladder stone. The stone removed weighed 465 grams. There was
no evidence of any infravesical obstruction on the cystoscopy performed before the operation or during the
operation. The stone consisted of 75% carbonate apatite and 25% struvite. Given that such a stone was found
in a mentally impaired patient indicates that infection stones can form without infravesical obstruction.
Key words: Ammonium phosphate (struvite); carbonate apatite; giant vesical calculus; magnesium.
Our aim in this report is to show that this rare clinical presenta- Conflict of Interest: No conflict of interest was declared by
tion is able to develop in the absence of infravesical obstruction. the authors.
In conclusion, almost all reports of giant bladder stones published Financial Disclosure: The authors declared that this study has
so far are stones that formed secondary to preoperative situations, received no financial support.
such as infravesical obstruction, neurogenic bladder or foreign
bodies. We think that this case is striking because of the finding References
that a giant infected stone can develop in the bladder without any
predisposing cause, warranting further investigation. 1. Aydogdu O, Telli O, Burgu B, Beduk Y. Infravesical obstruction
results as giant bladder calculi. Can Urol Asoc J 2011;5:77-8.
2. Thakur RS, Minhas SS, Jhobta R, Sharma D. Giant vesical calculus
As a second finding after reviewing the related literature on this
presenting with azotaemia and anuria. Indian J Surg 2007;69:147-9.
topic, we believe that large bladder stones should be viewed 3. Hızlı F, Yılmaz E. A giant bladder struvite stone in an adolescent
as a different clinical presentation than small bladder stones, boy. Urol Res 2012;40:273-4.
especially regarding the cause of their formation and treatment 4. Trinchieri A. Epidemiology of urolithiasis: an update. Clin Cases
option. We propose that this topic needs further discussion and Miner Bone Metab 2008;5:101-6.
evaluation. 5. Trinchieri A. Epidemiology of urolithiasis. Arch Ital Urol Androl
1996;68:203-49.
Informed Consent: Written informed consent was obtained 6. Schwartz BF, Stoller ML. The vesical calculus. Urol Clin Nort Am
from patient who participated in this case. 2000;27:333-46.
7. Ali SH, Rifat UN. Etiological and clinical patterns of childhood
Peer-review: Externally peer-reviewed. urolithiasis in Iraq. Pediatr Nephrol 2005;20:1453-7.
8. Douenias R, Rich M, Badlani G, Mazor D, Smith A. Predisposing
factors in bladder calculi: Review of 100 cases. Urology
Author Contributions: Concept - İ.N.T.; Design - İ.N.T., T.K.;
1991;37:240-3.
Funding - İ.N.T.; Analysis and/or Interpretation - İ.N.T.; Literature 9. Bichler KH, Eipper E, Naber K. Infection-induced urinary Stones.
Review - İ.N.T., T.K.; Writer - İ.N.T.; Critical Review - T.K. Urologe A 2003;42:47-55.
10. Saito S, Izumitani M, Shiroki R, Ishiguro K, Nagakubo I. Prolonged
Acknowledgements: We sincerely thank for interpretations, exposure to ıntravesical foreing body induces a giant calculus
Assistant Professor Turan Yıldız, Sakarya University in Medical with attendant renal dysfunction. Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi
School, Departmant of Pediatric Surgery Sakarya, Turkey. 1994;85:1777-80.