LABOR LAW REVIEW

M J Manuel
2nd semester, 2018-2019

xPART I
INTRODUCTION

1987 Constitution
Article II, Sec. 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, 18, 20
Article III, Sec. 1, 4, 8, 10, 16, 18 (2)
Article XIII, Sec. 1, 2, 3, 13, 14

Labor Code
Article 3, 4, 218, 290 (as amended by R.A. 10395)

PART II
RIGHT TO SELF-ORGANIZATION

Concept & Scope

Arts. 253, 257, 292 (c), 219 (e, f)

Omnibus Rules, Book V, Rule I-Rule II, as amended by D.O. 40, series of 2003

NUWHRAIN-Manila Pavilion Hotel Chapter v. Secretary, July 31, 2009

Employees on probationary status at the time of the certification elections should be

allowed to vote. In a certification election, all rank and file employees in the appropriate
bargaining unit, whether probationary or permanent are entitled to vote. The Code makes
no distinction as to their employment status as basis for eligibility in supporting the petition
for certification election. The law refers to all the employees in the bargaining unit. All
they need to be eligible to support the petition is to belong to the bargaining unit. Under
D.O. 40-03, any employee, whether employed for a definite period or not, shall beginning
on the first day of his/her service, be eligible for membership in any labor organization.
The provision in the CBA disqualifying probationary employees from voting cannot
override the Constitutionally-protected right of workers to self-organization, as well as the
provisions of the Labor Code and its Implementing Rules on certification elections and
jurisprudence thereon. All employees who are members of the appropriate bargaining unit
sought to be represented by the petitioner at the time of the issuance of the order granting
the conduct of a certification election shall be eligible to vote. period of reckoning in
determining who shall be included in the list of eligible voters is, in cases where a timely
appeal has been filed from the Order of the Med-Arbiter, the date when the Order of the
Secretary of Labor and Employment, whether affirming or denying the appeal, becomes
final and executory.

Samahan ng Manggagawa sa Hanjin Shipyard v. BLR, October 14, 2015

The right to self-organization is not limited to unionism. Workers may also form or join
an association for mutual aid and protection and for other legitimate purposes.

Holy Child Catholic School v. HCCS-TELU-PIGLAS, July 23, 2013

1
The alleged inclusion of supervisory employees in a labor organization seeking to
represent the bargaining unit of rank-and-file employees does not divest it of its status as
a legitimate labor organization

Labor Organizations and Registration of Unions

Labor Code: Arts. 219 (g, h), 237, 240-251, 292 (a)
Omnibus Rules, Book V, Rule I, Sec. 1 (a, h-p, w, cc, ee, ff, jj, kk, zz, ccc),
Rule III-V, XIV-XV, as amended by D.O. 40-03, as further amended by D.O. 40-B

Arts. 240, 241, 245, 246, 247, 248, 252

Department Order No. 40-F-03, series of 2008
(Implementing Rules for R.A. 9481 amendments)
San Miguel Corporation Employees Union-Philippine Transport And General Workers
Organization (SMCEU-PTGWO) v. San Miguel Packaging Products Employees Union-
Pambansang Diwa Ng Manggagawang Pilipino (SMPPEU-PDMP), September 12, 2007

A trade union center is NOT allowed to directly create a local or chapter through
chartering.
The Heritage Hotel Manila (Owned And Operated By Grand Plaza Hotel Corporation) v.
Pinag-Isang Galing At Lakas Ng Mga Manggagawa Sa Heritage Manila (Piglas-
Heritage), October 30, 2009
Eagle Ridge Golf and Country Club v. CA, March 18, 2010
Samahang Manggagawa Sa Charter Chemical (SMCC-SUPER) v. Charter Chemical and Coating
Corp., March 16, 2011

The inclusion of supervisory employees in a labor organization seeking to represent the bargaining
unit of rank-and-file employees does not divest it of its status as a legitimate labor organization.
Yokohama Tire Phils. v. Yokohama Employees Union, March 10, 2010

Takata Philippines v. BLR and SALAMAT, June 4, 2014

Eligibility for Membership; Special Groups of Employees

Labor Code: Arts. 255, 219 (m), 256

Department Order No. 40-F-03, series of 2008
Omnibus Rules, Book V, Rule I, Sec. 1 (hh), (nn), (xx), as amended by D.O. 40

Cathay Pacific Steel Corp. v. CA, August 30, 2006

Tamondong may have possessed enormous powers and was performing important
functions that goes with the position of Personnel Superintendent, nevertheless, there was
no clear showing that he is at liberty, by using his own discretion and disposition, to lay
down and execute major business and operational policies for and in behalf of CAPASCO.

San Miguel Corp. Supervisors and Exempt Union v. Laguesma, August 15, 1997

Confidential employees are those who (1) assist or act in a confidential capacity, (2) to
persons who formulate, determine, and effectuate management policies in the field of
labor relations. If access to confidential labor relations information is to be a factor in the
determination of an employees confidential status, such information must relate to the
employers labor relations policies

Standard Chartered Bank Employees Union (SCBEU-NUBE) v. Standard Chartered

2
Bank, April 22, 2008

bank cashiers as confidential employees

radio and telegraph operators who, having access to confidential information, may
become the source of undue advantage. Said employee(s) may act as spy or spies of
either party to a collective bargaining agreement
personnel staff, in which human resources staff may be qualified, as confidential
employees

Coastal Subic Bay Terminal v. DOLE, November 20, 2006

Tunay na Pagkakaisa ng Manggagawa sa Asia Brewery v. Asia Brewery, August 3, 2010

Respondent failed to indicate who among these numerous secretaries/clerks have access to
confidential data relating to management policies that could give rise to potential conflict
of interest with their Union membership. Clearly, the rationale under our previous rulings
for the exclusion of executive secretaries or division secretaries would have little or no
significance considering the lack of or very limited access to confidential information of
these secretaries/clerks.

twenty (20) checkers may not be considered confidential employees under the category of
Quality Control Staff

San Miguel Foods v. SMC Supervisors and Exempt Union, August 1, 2011

Payroll Master in the definition of a confidential employee

Heritage Hotel v. Secretary, July 23, 2014

Union Security Clause

Labor Code: Art. 259 (e)

BPI v. BPI Employees Union, August 10, 2010 (Main Decision & Dissenting Opinion),
October 19, 2011

General Milling Corp. v. Casio, March 10, 2010

PICOP Resources, Inc. v. Tañeca, August 9, 2010

Victoriano v. Elizalde Rope Workers Union, 59 SCRA 54

Kapatiran sa Meat and Canning Division v. Ferrer-Calleja, 162 SCRA 367

Conditions of Membership and Rights of Members

Labor Code: Arts. 250, 289, 228 (b), 259 (e)

Omnibus Rules, Book V, Rule XI, XII, XIII, XVIII, XX, as amended by D.O. 40

NOTE: Compare the original provisions of the Labor Code with the amended
provisions under R.A. No. 9481.
For reference:
Atlas Litographic Services v. Laguesma, 205 SCRA 12

3
De La Salle University Medical Center v. Laguesma, 294 SCRA 141

Tagaytay Highlands v. Tagaytay Highlands Employees Union-PTGWO,

January 22, 2003

4
PART III
BARGAINING UNIT
Omnibus Rules, Book V, Rule I, Sec. 1 (d, t), as amended by D.O. 40-03

De La Salle v. De La Salle University Employees’ Association, April 12, 2000

San Miguel Foods v. San Miguel Corp. Supervisors and Exempt Union, August 1, 2011

Holy Child Catholic School v. HCCS-TELU-PIGLAS, July 23, 2013

BARGAINING AGENT, CERTIFICATION ELECTION PROCEEDINGS

Labor Code: Arts. 267-272
Omnibus Rules, Book V , Rule I, Sec. 1 (d, h, j, o, p, q, t, ll, ss, bbb, a, tt, ww),
Rules VI-X, as amended by D.O. 40, D.O. 40-F-03, series of 2008, and further
amended by D.O. 40-I-15, series of 2015

Republic of the Philippines, represented by DOLE, v. Kawashima Textile, July 23, 2008

St. James School of Quezon City v. Samahang Manggagawa sa St. James, November 23,
2005

DHL Phils. United Rank and File Association v. Buklod ng Manggagawa ng DHL Phils.,
July 22, 2004

Sta. Lucia East Commercial Corporation v. Hon. Secretary Of Labor, August 14, 2009

Samahan Ng Mga Manggagawa Sa Samma–Lakas Sa Industriya Ng

Kapatirang Haligi Ng Alyansa (Samma–Likha) v. Samma Corporation,
March 13, 2009

Chris Garments Corporation v. Hon. Patricia Sto. Tomas and Chris Garments Workers
Union-PTGWO, January 12, 2009

National Union Of Workers In Hotels, Restaurants And Allied Industries- Manila

Pavilion Hotel Chapter v. Secretary of Labor, July 31, 2009

Eagle Ridge Golf and Country Club v. CA, March 18, 2010

PICOP Resources, Inc. v. Tañeca, August 9, 2010

Legend International v. Kilusang Manggagawa ng Legend, February 23, 2011

Samahang Manggagawa Sa Charter Chemical (SMCC-SUPER) v. Charter Chemical and

Coating Corp., March 16, 2011

Heritage Hotel v. Secretary, July 23, 2014

Republic of the Philippines v. Namboku Peak, July 18, 2014

T&H Shopfitters v. T&H Shopfitters Workers Union, February 26, 2014

Hijo Resources Corp. v. Mejares, January 13, 2016

5
Ren Transport Corp. V. NLRC, June 27, 2016

For reference:
(Voluntary Recognition) Sta. Lucia East Commercial Corporation v. Hon. Secretary Of
Labor, August 14, 2009
Coastal Subic Bay Terminal v. DOLE, November 20, 2006

6
PART IV

COLLECTIVE BARGAINING
Labor Code: Arts. 261-266, 258-260, 274
Omnibus Rules, Book V, Rule I, Sec. 1 (d, h, j, t, bbb), Rules XVI-XVII, as
amended by D.O. 40-03

Art. 237, 219 (n), 273-275 (b), 292 (f,g,h)

Omnibus Rules, Book V, Rule XIX, XXI, as amended by D.O. 40-03

Union of Filipro Employees v. Nestle Phils., March 3, 2008

PAL v. PALEA, March 12, 2008

San Miguel Foods v. San Miguel Corp. Employees Union, October 5, 2007

Capitol Medical Center v. Trajano, June 30, 2005

Standard Chartered Bank Employees Union v. Confesor, June 16, 2004

General Milling Corporation v. CA, February 11, 2004

FVC Labor Union-Philippine Transport and General Workers Organization

(FVCLU-PTGWO) v. Sama-Samang Nagkakaisang Manggagawa Sa
FVC (SANAMA-FVC-SIGLO), November 27, 2009

RFM Corporation v. KAMPI-NAFLU-KMU, February 4, 2009

Fulache v. ABS-CBN, GR No. 183810, January 21, 2010

Employees Union of Bayer v. Bayer Phils., December 6, 2010

General Milling Independent Labor Union v. General Milling, June 15, 2011

Malayan Employees Association v. Malayan Insurance Co., February 2, 2010

Santuyo v. Remerco Garments, March 22, 2010

Insular Hotel Employees Union v. Waterfront Insular, September 22, 2010

Cirtek Employees Labor Union v. Cirtek Electronics, November 15, 2010

Eastern Telecoms v. Eastern Telecoms Employees Union, February 8, 2012

PNCC Skyway Traffic Management & Security Division Workers Organization

v. PNCC Skyway Corp., February 17, 2010

Supreme Steel v. Nagkakaisang Manggagawa sa Supreme, March 28, 2011

Wesleyan University v. Wesleyan Univ. Faculty & Staff Association, March

7
 12, 2014

Goya v. Goya Employees Union, January 21, 2013

Rivera v. Espiritu, January 23, 2002

Ren Transport Corp. v. NLRC, SMART-ADLO, June 27, 2016

SONEDCO Workers Free Labor Union (SWOFLU) v. Universal Robina Corp.,

October 5, 2016

Erson and Lee Doing Business as Super Lamination Services v. SMSLS-

NAFLU-KMU, November 21, 2016

For reference:
Halagueña, et al., and other flight attendants of Philippine Airlines v Philippine
Airlines, October 2, 2009
PASSI v. Boclot, September 28, 2007

8
PART V
UNFAIR LABOR PRACTICES

Labor Code: Arts. 258-260, 274

The Insular Life Assurance Co., Ltd., Employees Association v. The Insular Life
Assurance Co., Ltd., January 30, 1971

Mabeza v. NLRC, April 18, 1997

T&H Shopfitters v. T&H Shopfitters Workers Union, February 26, 2014

Manila Mining Employees Corp. v. Manila Mining, September 29, 2010

Central Azucarera de Bais Employees Union v. Central Azucarera de Bais, Nov. 17, 2010

Employees Union of Bayer Phils. v. Bayer Phils., December 6, 2010

BPI Employees Union-Davao v. BPI, July 24, 2013

Prince Transport v. Garcia, January 12, 2011

Pepsi Cola Products v. Molon et al., February 18, 2013

Royal Plant Workers Union v. Coca Cola Bottlers, April 15, 2013

Bankard v. NLRC, March 6, 2013

Goya v. Goya Employees Union, January 21, 2013

Digitel Communications Philippines v. Digitel Employees Union, October 10, 2012

Mendoza v. Officers of Manila Water Employees Union (MWEU), January 25, 2016

9
PART VI
STRIKES, LOCKOUTS AND CONCERTED ACTIONS
Arts. 219 (o-s), 278-281, 266; Rules, Book V, Rule XXII, as amended by D.O. 40-03,
and further amended by D.O. 40-A, D.O. 40-G-03 (2010), and D.O. 40-H-13 (2013)
Bukluran ng Manggagawa sa Clothman Knitting v. CA, January 17, 2005

Steel Corporation v. SCP Employees Union, April 16, 2008

Biflex Phils. v. Filflex Industrial & Manufacturing Corp., Dec. 19, 2006

Bascon & Cole v. CA, February 5, 2004

Toyota Motor Phils. Corp. Workers Association v. Toyota Motor Phils, Oct. 19, 2007

NUWHRAIN Dusit Hotel Nikko Chapter v. CA, November 11, 2008

A. Soriano Aviation v. Employees Association of A. Soriano Aviation, August 14, 2009

Interphil Laboratories Employees Union-FFW v. Interphil Laboratories Inc., December 19,

2001.

Ramirez v. Polyson Industries, October 19, 2016

Capitol Medical Center v. NLRC, GR 147080, April 26, 2005

Trans-Asia Shipping Lines-Unlicensed Crews Employees Union v. CA, July 7, 2004

Manila Diamond Hotel Employees Union v. CA, Secretary, December 16, 2004

Philcom Employees Union v. Phil. Global Communications, July 17, 2006

Nissan Motors v. Secretary, June 21, 2006

FEU-NRMF v. FEU-NRMFEA-AFW, October 16, 2006

-----------------------------------

Pilipino Telephone Corporation v. PILTEA, June 22, 2007

Club Filipino v. Bautista, July 13, 2009

Jackbilt Industries v. Jackbilt Employees Union, March 20, 2009

Alcantara & Sons v. CA, GR G.R. No. 155109, September 29, 2010

PHIMCO Industries, Inc. v. PILA, August 11, 2010

Solidbank Corporation v. Gamier, November 15, 2010

Escario v. NLRC, September 27, 2010

Bagong Pagkakaisa ng Manggagawa sa Triumph v. Secretary, July 5, 2010

Fadriquelan v. Monterey Foods, June 8, 2011

10
Magdala Multipurpose & Livelihood v. KMLMS, October 19, 2011

Automotive Engine Rebuilders v. Progresibong Unyon, July 13, 2011; January 16, 2013

Naranjo v. Biomedica Heath Care, September 19, 2012

VCMC v. Yballe, January 15, 2014

Tabangao Shell Refinery Employees Association v. Pilipinas Shell, April 7, 2014

University of San Agustin Employees Union v. CA, March 28, 2006

Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corp. Employees Union v. NLRC, January 11, 2016

PMI Faculty and Employees Union v. PMI Colleges Bohol, June 29, 2016

Guagua National Colleges v. Guagua National Colleges Faculty Labor Union, July 13,
2016

11
PART VII
EMPLOYER-EMPLOYEE RELATIONSHIP

Elements of Relationship

Labor Code: Article 97 (a), (b), (c), (e); 173 (f), (g); 219 (e) & (f)

Television and Production Exponents v. Servaña, January 28, 2008

ABS-CBN Broadcasting Corp. v. Nazareno, Sept. 26, 2006
Fulache v. ABS-CBN, January 21, 2010
Dumpit-Murillo v. Court of Appeals, June 8, 2007
Fuji Television v. Espiritu, December 3, 2014
Begino v. ABS-CBN, April 20, 2015
(NOTE: Relate these six cases to Sonza v. ABS-CBN [June 10, 2004])

Bernante v. PBA, September 14, 2011

Abella v. PLDT, June 8, 2005
Consulta v. CA, March 18, 2005
Villamaria v. CA, April 19, 2006
Republic of the Philippines v. ASIAPRO, November 23, 2007
Phil. Global Communications v. De Vera, June 7, 2005
Coca Cola Bottlers v. Climaco, February 5, 2007
Chavez v. NLRC, January 17, 2005
Angelina Francisco v. NLRC, August 31, 2006
Tongko v. Manufacturers Life, June 29, 2010 & January 25, 2011
Matling Industrial v. Coros, October 13, 2010
Cosare v. Broadcom Asia, February 5, 2014
Atlanta Industries v. Sebolino, January 26, 2011
Intel Technology v. NLRC & Cabiles, February 5, 2014
Royale Homes v. Alcantara, July 28, 2014
Bazar v. Ruizol, October 19, 2016

Independent Contractors and Labor-Only Contractors

Labor Code: Art. 106-109

Department Order No. 174, series of 2017 (NOTE: Compare with DO No. 18-A)
Department Circular No. 1-2017

Philippine Airlines v. Ligan, February 29, 2008

San Miguel Corporation v. Aballa, June 28, 2005
Meralco Industrial Engineering Services v. NLRC, March 14, 2008
Manila Electric Company v. Benamira, July 14, 2005
Dole Phils. v. Esteva, November 30, 2006
Aliviado v. Procter and Gamble, March 9, 2010
Temic Automotive v. Temic Automotive Employees Union, December 23, 2009
Smart Communications v. Astorga, January 28, 2008
Coca-Cola Bottlers v. Agito, February 13, 2009
Manila Water v. Dalumpines, October 4, 2010
Babas v. Lorenzo Shipping, December 15, 2010
Teng v. Pahagac, November 17, 2010
CEPALCO v. CEPALCO Employees Labor Union, June 20, 2016
De Castro v. CA, October 5, 2016
Diamond Farms v. SPFL-Workers Solidarity, January 13, 2016
Quintanar v. Coca-Cola Bottlers, June 28, 2016

12
PART VIII
CLASSES OF EMPLOYEES

Arts. 293, 295-296; Rules, Book VI, Secs. 5-6

Magis Young Achievers’ Learning Center v. Manalo, February 13, 2009

Pier 8 Arrastre & Stevedoring Services v. Boclot, September 28, 2007
The Peninsula Manila v. Alipio, June 17, 2008
Rowell Industrial Corporation v. CA, March 7, 2007
ABS-CBN Broadcasting Corp. v. Nazareno, September 26, 2006
Kimberly Clark Phils. v. Secretary, November 23, 2007
Benares v. Pancho, April 29, 2005
Hacienda Bino/Hortencia Starke v. Cuenca, April 15, 2005
Filipinas Pre-fabricated Building Systems (FilSystems) v. Puente, March 18, 2005
St. Mary’s University v. CA, March 8, 2005
Poseidon Fishing v. NLRC, February 20, 2006
PLDT v. Arceo, May 5, 2006
Fulache v. ABS CBN, January 21, 2010
Leyte Geothermal Power Progressive Employees Union v. PNOC-EDC, March 30, 2011
Asos v. PNCC, July 3, 2013
Malicdem v. Marulas Industrial Corp., February 26, 2014
Exodus International Construction v. Biscocho, February 23, 2011
DM Consunji v. Gobres, August 8, 2010
Mercado v. AMA Computer College, April 13, 2010
Colegio del Santisimo Rosario v. Rojo, September 4, 2013
Gapayao v. Fulo, June 13, 2013
Universal Robina Sugar Milling Corp. v. Acibo, January 15, 2014
Abbott Laboratories v. Alcaraz, July 23, 2013, April 22, 2014
PNOC-EDC vs. Buenviaje, June 29, 2016
Fuji Television v. Espiritu, December 3, 2014
Basan v. Coca-Cola, February 4, 2015
Gadia v. Sykes Asia, January 28, 2015
Samonte v. La Salle Greenhills, Inc., February 10, 2016
A. Nate Casket Maker v. Arango, October 5, 2016

13
PART IX
SECURITY OF TENURE
Arts. 292 (b), 294, 297-302; D.O. 147-15

Just Causes

Salas v. Aboitiz One, June 27, 2008

RB Michael Press v. Galit, February 13, 2008
San Miguel Corporation v. NLRC, April 16, 2008
LBC Express v. Mateo, June 9, 2009
Genuino v. NLRC, December 4, 2007
Bughaw v. Treasure Island, March 28, 2008
Moreno v. San Sebastian College, March 28, 2008
Janssen Pharmaceutica v. Silayro, February 26, 2008
Suico v. NLRC, January 30, 2007
Perez & Doria v. PT&T, April 7, 2009
Bacolod-Talisay Realty v. Dela Cruz, April 30, 2009
Prudential Guarantee & Assurance Labor Union v. NLRC, June 13, 2012
Cosmos Bottling Co. v. Fermin, June 20, 2012
Sampaguita Auto Transport v. NLRC & Sagad, January 30, 2013
Dongon v. Rapid Movers, Augsut 28, 2013
Alilem Credit Cooperative v. Bandiola, February 25, 2013
Cavite Apparel v. Marquez, February 6, 2013
Esguerra v. Valle Verde, June 13, 2012
Santos v. Integrated Pharmaceutical, July 11, 2016
SAMASAH-NUWHRAIN v. VA Magsalin, June 6, 2011
Lopez v. Alturas Group of Companies, April 11, 2011
Puncia v. Toyota Shaw, June 28, 2016
Interadent Zahntechnik v. Simbillo, November 23, 2016

Union Security Clause

Alabang Country Club v. NLRC, February 14, 2008

Inguillo v. First Philippine Scales, June 5, 2009
General Milling Corp. v. Casio, March 10, 2010

Pregnancy

Leus v. St. Scholastica’s College Westgrove, January 28, 2015

Capin-Cadiz v. Brent Hospital and Colleges, February 24, 2016
Inocente v. St. Vincent Foundation for Children and Aging, June 22, 2016
Saudi Arabian Airlines [SAUDIA] v. Rebesencio, January 14, 2015

Criminal case

United Tourist Promotion v. Kemplin, February 5, 2014

St. Luke’s Medical Center v. Sanchez, March 11, 2015

Disease

Crayons Processing v. Pula, July 30, 2007

Villaruel v. Yeo Han Guan, June 1, 2011
Padillo v. Rural bank of Nabunturan, January 21, 2013
Deoferio v. Intel Technology, June 18, 2014

14
Illegal Strike

Jackbilt Industries v. Jackbilt Employees Union, March 20, 2009

Escario v. NLRC, September 27, 2010
Abaria v. NLRC, December 7, 2011 (relate to Bascon v. CA, February 5, 2004)
PHIMCO Industries v. PHIMCO Industries Labor Association, August 11, 2010
VCMC v. Yballe, January 15, 2014

Authorized Causes

Andrada v. NLRC, December 28, 2007

Manatad v. PT&T, March 7, 2008
Linton Commercial v. Hellera, October 10, 2007
AMA Computer College v. Garcia, April 14, 2008
GSWU-NAFLU-KMU v. NLRC, October 17, 2006
Dickinson Philippines v. NLRC, November 15, 2005
PT & T v. NLRC, April 15, 2005
Oriental Petroleum v. Fuentes, October 14, 2005
FASAP v. PAL, July 22, 2008 and October 2, 2009
General Milling Corp. v. Viajar, January 30, 2013
Am-Phil Food v. Padilla, October 1, 2014
SPI Technologies v. Mapua, April 7, 2014
PNCC Skyway Corp. v. Secretary, April 19, 2016

Constructive Dismissal/Preventive Suspension

Maricalum v. Decorion, April 12 2006

Uniwide Sales v. NLRC, February 29, 2008
Norkis Trading v. Genilo, February 11, 2008
Fungo v. Lourdes School, July 27, 2007
The University of the Immaculate Conception v. NLRC, January 26, 2011
Robinsons Galleria/Robinsons Supermarket Corp. v. Ranchez, January 19, 2011
Dreamland Hotel v. Johnson, March 12, 2014
INTEC Cebu v. CA, June 22, 2016
Agcolicol v. Casiño, June 15, 2016

Temporary Suspension of Operations/Floating Status

Manila Mining Corp. Employees Association v. Manila Mining Corp., September 29,
2010
Nippon Housing v. Leynes, August 3, 2011
SKM Art Corp. v. Bauca, November 27, 2013
Exocet Security v. Serrano, September 29, 2014

Suspension

Caong v. Regualos, January 26, 2011

Montinola v. PAL, September 8, 2014

15
Consequences of Dismissal

Composite Enterprises v. Caparoso, August 8, 2007

Sagum v. CA, May 26, 2005
Agabon v. NLRC, November 17, 2004
Jaka Food Processing v. Pacot, March 28, 2005
Industrial Timber v. Ababon, March 30, 2006
Sangwoo Phil. v. Sangwoo Phils. Employees Union, December 9, 2013
Equitable Banking v. Sadac, June 8, 2006
Carlos v. CA, August 28, 2007
Tomas Claudio Memorial College v. CA, February 16, 2004
Chronicle Securities v. NLRC, November 25, 2004
Intercontinental Broadcasting v. Benedicto, July 20, 2006
Velasco v. NLRC, June 26, 2006
PCIB v. Abad, February 28, 2005
Bago v. NLRC, April 4, 2007
Panuncillo v. CAP Phils., February 9, 2007
Garcia v. Philippine Airlines, January 20, 2009
PAL v. Paz, November 26, 2014
Islriz v.Capada, January 31, 2011
Lansangan v. Amkor Technology Philippines, January 30, 2009
Palteng v. UCPB, February 27, 2009
Alcantara & Sons v. CA, September 29, 2010
Aboc v. Metrobank, December 13, 2010
Prince Transport v. Garcia, January 12, 2011
Robinsons Galleria/Robinsons Supermarket Corp. v. Ranchez, January 19, 2011
Pfizer v. Velasco, March 9, 2011
Luna v. Allado Construction, May 30, 2011
Villaruel v. Yeo Han Guan, June 1, 2011
Nacar V. Gallery Frames, August 13, 2013
Integrated Microelectronics V. Pionilla, August 28, 2013
United Tourist Promotion V. Kemplin, February 5, 2014
University of Pangasinan v. Fernandez, November 12, 2014
Wenphil Corporation v. Abing, April 7, 2014

Appeal Bond

McBurnie v. Ganzon, EGI-Managers, Inc., October 17, 2013

Sara Lee v. Macatlang, June 4, 2014
Balite v. SS Ventures, Feb. 2015

16
PART X
DISPUTE SETTLEMENT

Labor Code: Arts. 128-129, 220-232, 266, 273-277, 278 (g-i), 303-304, 307 (b), 305-307
Note the amendments introduced by R.A. 9347and R.A. 10741
Executive Order No. 126 & 251

Secretary/Regional Director

People’s Broadcasting v. Secretary, May 8, 2009 and March 6, 2012

South Cotabato Communications Corp. v. Sto. Tomas, June 15, 2016
Republic of the Philippines v. Namboku Peak, July 18, 2014

DO 183-17: Revised Rules on the Administration And Enforcement of Labor Laws

Pursuant To Article 128 of the Labor Code, as Renumbered

Bureau of Labor Relations

Diokno v. Cacdac, July 4, 2007

Labor Arbiter

Jaguar Security v. Sales, April 22, 2008

Pioneer Concrete Philippines v. Todaro, June 8, 2007
Tegimenta Chemical Phils. v. Buensalida, June 17, 2008
Milan v. NLRC, February 4, 2015
Indophil v. Adviento, August 4, 2014
Am-Phil Food Concepts v. Padilla, October 1, 2014
Pentagon Steel Corp. v. CA, June 26, 2009
Supra Multi-Services v. Tambunting, August 3, 2016
Malayan Insurance Company v. Alibudbud, April 20, 2016

Voluntary Arbitration

Negros Metal Corp. v. Lamayo, August 25, 2010

Albert Teng Fish Trading v. Pahagac, November 17, 2010
Manila Pavillion v. Delada, January 25, 2012
Honda Cars v. Honda Cars Technical Specialists and Supervisors, November 19, 2014
PHILEC v. CA, December 10, 2014
Baronda v. CA, October 14, 2015

NLRC; Decision, Finality; Rule 65 Petition

Jordan v. Grandeur Security, June 18, 2014

Sarona v. NLRC, January 18, 2012
Metro Transit Organization v. PIGLAS NFWU-KMU, April 14, 2008
PHILTRANCO v. PWU-AGLO, February 26, 2014

Appeal

Prince Transport v. Garcia, January 12, 2011.

Unilever v. Rivera, June 3, 2013.

17
Appeal Bond

McBurnie v. Ganzon, EGI-Managers, Inc., October 17, 2013

Sara Lee v. Macatlang, June 4, 2014 and January 14, 2015
Balite v. SS Ventures, Feb. 2015
Hacienda Valentin-Balabag v. Secretary, February 11, 2008

Execution; Updating of Award

Nacar v. Gallery Frames, August 13, 2013

University of Pangasinan v. Fernandez, November 12, 2014
Metroguards Security v. Hilongo, March 9, 2015

Miscellaneous

Masmud v. NLRC, February 13, 2009 (attorney’s fees)

Arriola v. Pilipino Star Ngayon, August 13, 2014 (prescription)
Montero v. Times Transport, March 16, 2015 (prescription)
Phil. Carpet Manufacturing Corp. v. Tagyamon, December 11, 2013 (quitclaim)
Am-Phil Food Concepts v. Padilla, October 1, 2014 (quitclaim)

18