Instrument Transformers

Technical Information and Application Guide

ABB Power Distribution

Contents
Technology Review

An introduction to instrument transformer fundamentals, a discussion on

power quality and a detailed explanation of design considerations in
3
selecting an instrument transformer.

Product Description

A detailed description of ABB’s current and voltage transformers.

This section describes the specific classes and uses for instrument
35
transformers and is complemented with pictures and illustrations.
 Technology Review

Technology Review

Introduction ........................................................................................................... 4

Types of Construction ........................................................................................... 6

Performance Characteristics ................................................................................ 8

Accuracy Classification for Meters ...................................................................... 12

Burdens ................................................................................................................... 13

Accuracy Classes for Relaying .............................................................................. 15

Insulation Systems ................................................................................................. 16

Voltage Ratings ...................................................................................................... 18

Power Quality......................................................................................................... 21

Service Conditions ................................................................................................. 23

Auxiliary Current Transformers.......................................................................... 30

Fusing Voltage Transformers ............................................................................... 31

New Technologies .................................................................................................. 32

3
Technology Review

Introduction Instrument transformers (ITs) are designed to transform: voltage

(Voltage (VTs) or Potential Transformers (PTs)) or current (Current
transformers (CTs)) from the high values in the transmission and dis-
tribution systems to the low values that can be utilized by low voltage
current metering devices. There are three primary applications for
which ITs are used:
· metering (for energy billing and transaction purposes)
· protection control (for system protection and protective
relaying purposes)
· load survey (for economic management of industrial
loads)

Depending on the requirements for those applications, the IT design

and construction can be quite different. Generally, the metering ITs
require high accuracy in the range of normal operating voltage and
current. Protection ITs require linearity in a wide range of voltages
and currents. During the disturbance, such as a system fault or over
voltage transients, the output of the IT is used by a protective relay to
initiate an appropriate action (open or close a breaker, reconfigure the
system, etc.) to mitigate the disturbance and protect the rest of the
power system. Instrument transformers are the most common and
economic way to detect a disturbance. Typical output levels of instru-
ment transformers are 0-5 A and 115-120 V for CTs and VTs, respec-
tively. There are several classes of accuracy for instrument transform-
ers defined by the IEEE, CSA, IEC and ANSI standards. Figure 1
presents a conceptual design of CTs and VTs.

Figure 1: Current and Potential Transformer Symbols & Simplified Concepts

4
 Technology Review

Electric current or voltage can be measured by bringing it to a suit-

able instrument. In many electric power circuits, however, the cur-
rent and voltage are both so high that it is desirable, for cost and
safety reasons, to bring the circuit to the primary winding terminals
of a voltage transformer, to measure voltage, or through the primary
winding of a Current Transformer, to measure current. Standard sec-
ondary circuit voltages are 115 or 120 volts. Standard secondary
circuit current is 5 amperes. Figure 2 shows how the polarity mark-
ers are used to keep the direction of current flow in the meters ex-
actly the same, as if the primary circuit was carried through the me-
ters. Grounding of the secondary circuit is most important, but in
complicated three-phase connections, the best point to ground is not
always easily determined.

Figure 2: Instrument Transformer Connections

A. The current transformer is designed to connect in series with the line to transform the line
current to the standard 5 amperes suitable to the meter or relay. The voltage transformer is de-
signed to connect in parallel with the line to transform the line voltage to 115 or 120 volts suit-
able for the meter or relay.

To keep the voltage at the meters and relays at a safe value, the secondary circuit must be
grounded.

B. The polarity markers indicate the relative instantaneous directions of current in the windings.
For current-operated or voltage-operated devices the polarity, or instantaneous direction of
current, there is of no significance. Correct operation of current-current, voltage-voltage or
current-voltage devices usually depends on the relative instantaneous directions.

5
Technology Review

Types of Construction The principal forms of construction used for instrument transform-
ers, together with standard rating symbols according to IEEE Stan-
dard C57.13 are shown in Figure 3.

Figure 3: Types of Instrument Transformer Construction

3a. Simple Basic Forms

Current Transformer Voltage Transformer

3b. Window, Bar and Bushing

3c. Tapped Secondary

6
 Technology Review

Materials Used in In the 1970’s, the insulating medium for the higher voltage (5-34.5
Construction kV) units was butyl rubber. The material itself is excellent, but the
pressures and temperatures necessary to use it as a dielectric were
Butyl Rubber not conducive to the exacting clearances and geometries inside a
voltage or current transformer. Without excess bracing, the core/coil
assemblies would shift during molding and fail BIL testing. With
enough bracing, the material flow inside the unit was restricted, in-
creasing the possibility of voids. For these reasons, another dielec-
tric insulating material was sought. However, Butyl rubber is still
used by some manufacturers.

Cycloalophatic Epoxy A common and excellent insulator in use by other manufacturers in

the late ‘70’s was cycloalophatic epoxy. This material was poured
under a vacuum and the processing temperatures were not as high as
butyl rubber, so this was selected for the dielectric. Because its di-
electric characteristics were so similar, almost no changes to the
winding designs were necessary electrically, for the change from
butyl to epoxy.

During the early 1980’s, it was discovered that epoxy’s mechanical

properties were less than desired. The elongation and expansion co-
efficient characteristics of epoxy were brittle. Skirts on outdoor
units were easily chipped and/or cracked off. The expansion coeffi-
cient was not conducive to temperature swings in some areas of the
country, so excess cracking occurred. The search for a new dielec-
tric began again, and ended in 1986 with Polyurethane.

Introduction to Urethane Polyurethane (or urethane) elastomers are one type of a large family
Elastomers of elastic polymers called rubber. There are 14 types in general use.
All of them have been commercially successful, but they are all dif-
ferent in several ways.

Thirteen of these types are called conventional rubber. That means

they are mixed, milled and molded by techniques which have been
in use by the rubber industry for the past eighty years.

Polyurethane rubber raw materials are liquid, which permits them to

be pumped, metered, mixed and dispensed by machines under very
precise control of temperature and ingredient proportions. They en-
ter molds as a liquid at low pressure and are “cured” at the same
elevated temperature as that at which they are mixed. This unique
characteristic allows molding of large parts which are completely
uniform throughout.

Diversity of Urethane Usage In the electrical industry, polyurethane is used both as a flexible,
insulating jacket on control and power supply cables, as well as a
dielectric and outdoor jacket for 55° C rise transformers. One of the
features of urethane which makes it so popular, is its ability to be
permanently attached to metals and composites very readily during
the molding or casting process. Bond strength exceeding the tear
strength of urethane can be achieved.

7
Technology Review

Performance The specific performance characteristics of instrument transformers

are most easily determined from the equivalent circuit. Figure 4
Characteristics works well for nearly all instrument transformers. For current trans-
Equivalent Circuits formers, the value of the reactance X is determined in a special way
so that it will represent the leakage flux. The flux flows in the part
of the core which is represented by the left-hand exciting branch of
the equivalent circuit shown in Figure 4.

By use of an additional winding (or windings) placed over the outer

leg(s) of the core and connected back in parallel with the secondary
winding as shown in Figure 4, the leakage flux can be kept out of
the core. The leakage reactance is then effectively connected ahead
of both exciting branches as shown. This difference is important for
current transformers only because leakage flux in the core affects
current ratio. It also improves the performance of current transform-
ers and makes their performance subject to simple calculation.

A voltage transformer will be designed so that the through imped-

ance (Rs, R, Xp and X) is as low as possible, while the current
transformer will be designed such that the excitation impedance (Zo
and Zi) is as high as possible. Neither transformer is very good at
performing the function of the other.

Figure 4: Equivalent Circuits

A. A typical transformer and its equivalent cir-
cuit. The leakage flux is shown entering the outer
part of the core and is represented by reactance
X. The reactance develops voltage applied to the
exciting branch Zo which represents the outer
side of the core. The series impedance Rp + Rs +
j (Xp + X) is responsible for the loss of voltage in
transformation. The voltage transformers are
carefully designed to keep this impedance as low
as possible. The loss of current in transformation
is due to current by-passed by the exciting
branches Zo and Zi. Current transformers are
specially designed to keep these by-pass exciting
impedances as high as possible.

B. A common construction of HV or EHV current

transformer. Leakage flux enters the core, even
though the winding is uniformly wound over a
ring core. The equivalent circuit is the same as
for Figure A.

C. A construction used in HV or EHV current

transformers. The parallel auxiliary winding
effectively keeps the leakage flux out of the core
so that the leakage reactance in the equivalent
circuit is effectively ahead of the exciting
branches. This simplifies the calculation of the
current by-passed through Zo and Zi. (They can
(B) be combined-see Relaying Accuracy.)

D. A typical bushing current transformer. This

resembles the transformer in B but has only negligible leakage flux in the core because the return
conductor is far away. This transformer still has a good deal of leakage reactance, but the leak-
age flux does not enter the core in significant amount. The reactance is ahead of the by-pass
branches Zo. and Zi so that the performance as a current transformer can be easily calculated.
(See Relaying Accuracy.)

8
 Technology Review

The value of through impedance is constant, but the value of excita-

tion impedance is variable. The exciting impedances representing
the exciting currents for the two parts of the core depend on the
voltage applied to them, or the current flowing in them, or flux den-
sity in the core. The easiest way to understand Zo and Zi, which are
of primary importance in current transformers, is to draw
"saturation" curves showing how the current flowing into the excit-
ing branch varies with the voltage applied, as in Figure 5. The curve
is usually plotted for the combination of Zo and Zi in parallel.

Voltage transformers are designed such that the operating point on

the saturation curve, as in Figure 5, is typically at a relatively high
voltage. This is subject to the limitation that this point must not be
so high that the exciting current itself is excessive. Voltage trans-
formers are designed to work without excessive exciting current up
to 110% of rated voltage. The IEEE standard for performance re-
quires good performance also at 90% voltage. Figure 5 shows that
the exciting current will not reach a higher per unit value, with con-
sequent increase of voltage loss from exciting current, at voltages
over the range of 5% to 110%.

Figure 5: Typical Saturation Curve for a Transformer Core

Voltage transformers are designed such

that the operating point on the saturation
curve is typically at a relatively high
voltage.

The voltage must not be so high that the

exciting current itself becomes too high.
This would cause a voltage drop in the
primary impedance that would bring
about an excessive error in ratio of
phase angle. IEEE C57.13 requires
performance standards to be met at
110% of rated voltage. The curve shows
that the per unit exciting current, below
which the error due to voltage drop
caused by the exciting current itself will
equal that at 110% rated voltage typi-
cally will be less than 5% rated voltage.
Down to this value the voltage trans-
former will meet standard performance
limits.

The current transformer, on the other

hand, is designed to operate at the low
range of the curve (see region marked on
the curve) so that the exciting current
by-pass will be as low as feasible. The
curve shows that as the voltage is reduced, the exciting current is not reduced in proportion. This
means, in a current transformer, that as the primary and secondary current decrease, the
by-pass current which causes the error actually increases in percentage. The errors in current
transformation typically increase at the lower currents.

9
Technology Review

Ratio Error and Ideal or "perfect" transformers induce the same voltage per turn in
Phase Angle the secondary winding as that applied to the primary voltage trans-
formers. They also produce the same ampere-turns in the secondary
as are circulated in the primary current transformers, to deliver any
desired ratio of primary to secondary voltage or current. In the ac-
tual transformer shown in Figure 6, the secondary current output is
deficient by the amount of current bypassed by the exciting
branches, Zo and Zi, and the secondary output voltage is deficient by
the voltage drop in the transformer through impedance.

The transformer nameplates show a "marked ratio," usually an even

number such as 20 to 1. The actual ratio of primary to secondary
quantity may be slightly higher or lower than the marked value by
an amount1 called Ratio Error, which is defined in IEEE C57.13 as
Ratio Correction Factor (RCF). For instance, if the Actual Ratio is
20.2 to 1, the Ratio Correction Factor is 1.01 and the Ratio Error is
1%. In addition, the secondary output may be slightly out of phase
with the primary input. This error is called Phase Angle (usually
measured in minutes) and is designated as positive if the secondary
output leads the primary input.
1.
The ratio of turns is usually adjusted to "compensate" for the losses in the transformer, and
because of this "compensation" the actual secondary output can be higher than would be ex-
pected from the marked ratio.

The Effect of Ratio Error and If the Ratio Correction Factor exceeds 1.0, the meters will read low
Phase Angle on Wattmeter and the readings should be multiplied by the Correction Factor. The
Readings effect of Phase Angle, however, is not as obvious. To determine rea-
sonable limits for RCF and Phase Angle, a combination Correction
Factor has been invented, called Transformer Correction Factor
(TCF). This is dependent on both RCF and Phase Angle and may be
used to correct the reading of a wattmeter. Transformer Correction
Factor (TCF) is based on the fact that if the power factor of a me-
tered power load is 60% lagging (a figure selected as representing
about the usual minimum power factor of actual power loads being
metered by watt hour meters), 2.6 minutes of Phase Angle in the
current (or voltage) transformer output will cause 0.1% error in the
wattmeter reading.

10
 Technology Review

Voltage Transformers The ratio correction factor and phase angle must be determined at
the specific burden involved. However, as with an actual measure-
ment, these values apply to the secondary voltage at the transformer
terminals. If the leads from the transformer to the burden are very
long, they may have sufficient impedance to introduce additional
voltage drop and error. From the current drawn from the trans-
former and the impedance of the leads, the voltage drop in the leads
can be calculated. If it is of appreciable magnitude in percent of sec-
ondary voltage, the addition to ratio and phase angle error may be
calculated according to the vector diagram in Figure 6 and the for-
mulas:

Percent Ratio will be increased by:

Is (RL cos q + XL sin q) x 100

Es

Add this amount to the percent ratio of the transformer to get the
actual percent ratio of primary to burden voltage.

The Phase Angle will be increased by:

Is (RL sin q - XL cos q) x 3438 Minutes

Es

Add this amount to the phase angle of the transformer

(algebraically) to get the actual phase difference between primary
and burden voltages.

Figure 6: Effect of Leads in Voltage Transformers

RL and XL represent the resistance and reactance in the leads

Method for calculating impedance drops in the leads and resulting ratio and phase angle errors

11
Technology Review

Current Transformers The ratio correction factor and phase angle must be determined at
the specific burden and current involved. Current transformer char-
acteristics at special burdens can only be determined by an actual
measurement. The test burden must duplicate the actual burden, in-
cluding the secondary leads. The secondary terminal voltage and
power factor must be identical to that of the installation. In addition,
these measurements need to be made and applied at the actual ser-
vice currents.

Accuracy Classifications An explanation of accuracy classes can be obtained from careful

for Metering inspection of Figure 7 for current transformers and Figure 8 for volt-
age transformers. These figures show the Accuracy Classes as
adopted by IEEE, as well as the special limitations which apply to
current and voltage transformers. IEEE C57.13 has recognized 0.3%
as a reasonable error limit and has designated this as "Accuracy
Class 0.3."

Figure 7: The Basic 0.3 Class Parallelogram for Current Transformers

Figure 8: The Basic 0.3 Class Parallelogram for Voltage Transformers

This parallelogram outlines an area in which the measurements of RCF and This parallelogram outlines an area in which the measurements of RCF and
Phase Angle at 100% current must plot if the transformer accuracy is to be Phase Angle at 100% (also at 110%) voltage must plot if the transformer
designated as 0.3 Class, with TCF within the limits of 0.997 and 1.003. For accuracy is to be designated as 0.3 Class, with TCF within the limits of 0.997
example, if the RCF at a given burden at 100% current is 0.998 (99.8% Ratio) and 1.003. For example, if the measured RCF at a given burden is 0.999 and
and the Phase Angle is 3.5 minutes, the point A is seen to fall outside the the phase angle is — 8 minutes, the point A is seen to fall outside the paral-
parallelogram. lelogram. Another example: RCF = 1.002, Phase angle in 10 minutes, both
representing greater absolute errors, but the point “B” is now inside the
Another example: RCF = 1.002, Phase Angle 5 minutes, representing greater parallelogram, and meets the required limits for the 0.3 Class. In the second
absolute error, the point "B" is now inside the parallelogram, and meets the case the TCF is less than 1.003 because the effect of phase angle on the watt-
required limits for 0.3 Accuracy Class. In the second case, TCF is less than meter compensates for the phase angle.
1.003 because the effect of phase angle on the wattmeter compensates for the
error in ratio. The reason for the reversed appearance of Figure 8 compared to Figure 7 is
that phase angle in the current transformer brings the secondary current more
IEEE C57.13 recognizes that current transformers naturally have greater nearly in phase with the load voltage, increasing the wattmeter reading. In the
errors at lower currents, and that error at low current does not usually repre- voltage transformer the effect is just the opposite.
sent significant error in total registration of kilowatt hours. This permits twice
the error at 10% that is permitted at 100% current. The error at the maximum C57.13 requires that the limits be met also at 90% voltage; in reality the
current permitted by the Thermal Rating Factor of the transformer (a multi- performance at voltages down to 5% are not significantly different, at the
plier of 1.5 or 4.0 applied to many transformers) is limited to the same value same burden connected to the transformer secondary. The error limits re-
as at 100% current. quired by C57.13 apply not only at a given burden but at zero burden.

Other Accuracy Classes: In addition to the 0.3 Class, C57.13 recognizes the Other Accuracy Classes, in addition to the 0.3 Class, C57.13 recognizes the
0.6 and 1.2 Classes in which the permissible errors are twice as great (0.6%) 0.6 and 1.2 Classes in which the permissible errors are twice as great (0.6%)
and twice again (1.2%) as compared to the 0.3 Class. Any one of these classes and twice again (1.2%) as compared to the 0.3 Class. Any one of these classes
may be selected for specification by the user depending on whether 0.3%, may be selected for specification by the user depending on whether 0.3% ,
0.6% or 1.2% seem reasonable for a given application. 0.6%, or 1.2% seem reasonable for a given application.

12
 Technology Review

Burdens The errors in ratio and phase angle will depend on the impedance
connected to the secondary of the transformer. This impedance is
commonly referred to as "burden". The calculations required for
determining the performance of a transformer when different bur-
dens are applied, are beyond the scope of this discussion. Therefore,
the standard burdens as outlined in IEEE C57.13 will be used to
represent typical service conditions. Each transformer is rated ac-
cording to its performance at these standard burdens.

Standard Burdens for Many current transformers supply only a limited number of wat-
Current Transformers thour meter elements with a limited number of runs. For metering
and relaying applications IEEE C57.13 has established the standard
burdens as given in Figure 9.

Figure 9: Standard Burdens for Current Transformers

Standard Burdens for Current Transformers with 5 A Secondaries *

Burden Resistance 9 Inductance Impedance 9 Volt Amperes Power
DesignationU (mH) (at 5 A) Factor

Metering Burdens

B-0.1 0.09 0.116 0.1 2.5 0.9

B-0.2 0.18 0.232 0.2 5.0 0.9
B-0.5 0.45 0.580 0.5 12.5 0.9
B-0.9 0.81 1.040 0.9 22.5 0.9
B-1.8 1.62 2.080 1.8 45.0 0.9

Relaying Burdens

B-1 0.50 2.300 1.0 25.0 0.5

B-2 1.00 4.600 2.0 50.0 0.5
B-4 2.00 9.200 4.0 100.0 0.5
B-8 4.00 18.400 8.0 200.0 0.5

* If a current transformer is rated at other than 5 A, ohmic burdens for specification and rating
may be derived by multiplying the resistance and inductance of the table by [5/(ampere rating)]2
the VA at rated current and the power factor remaining the same.
UThese standard burden designations have no significance at frequencies other than 60 Hz.

Actual Burdens for Actual devices connected to instrument transformers often include
Current Transformers an inductor with an iron core, which usually means that the induc-
tance is not constant but varies during the cycle, and varies differ-
ently with different currents. Exact analysis of current transformer
performance with such devices is difficult. Fortunately, the imped-
ances of most instruments and meters are sufficiently constant that
no appreciable error is introduced by considering them to be con-
stant. Many electro-mechanical relays, however, have variable im-
pedance. Analysis of the transformer performance is usually based
on an equivalent value at normal current. This can be justified on
the basis that the burden at higher current is usually less and thus
the current transformer will perform better than expected from the

13
Technology Review

equivalent burden. Some relays operate from two or more sources

of current: differential (current-current), or power or im-
pedance-measuring (current-voltage) relays. If the two circuits are
magnetically coupled by the relay, the burden on one source is af-
fected by the current in the other source, and vice versa. Most of the
two-source relays act by balance-beam or other mechanical cou-
pling, so that the burdens are fixed.

Standard Burdens for The standard burdens to be used for testing and comparing voltage
Voltage Transformers transformers are rated at 120 volts and at 69.3 volts. IEEE C57.13
specifies that the 120 volt-rated burden will be used for any trans-
former with the secondary voltage in the range of 115 to 120 volts,
while the 69.3 volt burden will be used for any transformer with the
secondary voltage in the range of 65 to 72 volts. This means that the
actual volt amperes in the burden in a given test may be different
than the nominal value of the burden in volt amperes. For instance,
if the standard burden is 25 volt amperes, the actual burden when it
is used for testing a transformer with 115 volt secondary is (115/
120)2 or .918 times the nominal value of 25.

The burdens rated 69.3 volts have an impedance only 1/3 of that of
burdens rated 120 volts and they should not be used in testing or
rating transformers rated at 115 to 120 volts. Transformers rated at
115 or 120 volts should be treated as 115 or 120 volt transformers,
and if they are actually used at reduced voltage, the performance
will not be different if the 120 volt burden is used as a basis for per-
formance. This is because the performance of a transformer down to
voltages of about 5% of its rating is not significantly different from
the performance at 100% voltage.

Reference Figure 10 for standard burdens for voltage transformers

as outlined in IEEE C57.13.

Figure 10: Standard Burdens for Voltage Transformers

Standard Burdens for Voltage Transformers

Burden Impedance 9
Burden Designation Volt Amperes Power Factor 120 V Burden 69.3 V Burden

Metering W 12.5 0.10 1152 384

Burdens X 25.0 0.70 576 192
M 35.0 0.20 411 137
Y 75.0 0.85 192 64

14
 Technology Review

Current Transformers Relaying accuracy classes for CTs are defined either with a “C” or a
“T” classification.
Accuracy Classes for
Relaying C– indicates that the transformer ratio can be calculated. These are
transformers which are constructed so that the effect of leakage
fluxes on its performance are negligible.

T– indicates the transformer where the leakage flux has an apprecia-

ble effect on the ratio. Since the calculation of the excitation current
by-passed is a tedious process, the performance of the transformer
can only be determined by test.

The basis for classification of performance for relaying is an error

limit of 10% at any current from 1.0 to 20 times normal. The accu-
racy class is the description of how much voltage the transformer
can supply to the output circuit (burden), without the CT’s core go-
ing into saturation.

For example, a transformer that can supply a 2 ohm output circuit

(burden) at 100A [20 times normal current (5A)] or 200V, without
saturating the core and within a 10% error limit, is classified as 200
accuracy class. See Figure 11.

Standard accuracy classes, which may be assigned for a relaying

current transformer, are 50, 100, 200 and 800. If a C200 transformer
can supply 100A secondary output at exactly 10% error into a 2
ohm burden, then we know that the exciting branch is not over 10
amps. If the current is lower, then the burden can be higher without
exceeding the output voltage limit if a transformer can carry 2 ohms
at 50 amps and deliver 200 volts. However, if the burden is 1 ohm at
200 amps, it will not work since the internal impedance will be sig-
nificant in relation to the 1 ohm burden.

Figure 11: Accuracy Standard Chart

Accuracy Standard Chart for Class C Current

Transformers

800
Secondary Terminal Volts

C800
700
600
8 Ohm
500
C400
400
300 4 Ohm
200
C200
2 Ohm
100
1 Ohm C100
0
0 10 20 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Secondary Amps

15
Technology Review

Insulation Systems Partial discharges (PD) are minute electrical discharges that result
from the electric field stresses imposed on any insulation system. As
Partial Discharges in the name suggests, they do not cause a complete electrical break-
Transformer Insulation down of the insulation, so their short term effect is not catastrophic.
However, over the long term, PD can slowly deteriorate the quality
of the insulation. In solid insulation systems (such as in instrument
transformers), PD can occur where a void or discontinuity in solid
insulation is introduced Figure 12. Because of the difference be-
tween dielectric properties of a void (filled with air or gas) and solid
material, the localized electrical stress in the void can be higher than
in a solid. This will cause a void to break down although the voltage
across the solid will remain (Figure 12). These localized void
breakdowns, resulting in small, high frequency current impulses,
can be detected by using sensitive instrumentation. Sophisticated,
specialized analysis of PD patterns can then be used to gain insight
to the nature of PD, its possible location, and mitigation. PD is
measured in pico Coulombs (pC) unit of electrical charge. After
many years of deliberation, different standards for different electri-
cal equipment (ANSI, IEC, IEEE) do not consistently agree on the
allowable or maximum limits of PD. Manufacturers of ITs use dif-
ferent ways of minimizing or controlling the level of PD:
· Control of manufacturing processes (casting, curing, tempera-
tures, vacuum, viscosities, etc.) to minimize the introduction of
voids
· Develop designs of ITs that result in minimizing stress fields
· Fill voids with dielectric gas to lower the risk of void break-
down
· Increase design margin to lower overall electric field stresses
within the unit
· Use different materials as solid insulation system

Figure 12: Partial Discharges

A. A sample of solid insulation between electrodes, which forms a

capacitor, can have a void as shown.

B. The electrically equivalent capacitance network.

C. Applied voltage and the corresponding PD current caused by

breaking down the void .

16
 Technology Review

Overloading, Overheating All insulation materials are deteriorated by the combination of over-
and Aging heating and exposure to moisture and oxygen. ABB insulation sys-
tems are well protected against moisture and oxygen. ABB ITs
meet and/or exceed the IEEE Guides for Loading Applications per
Appendix C57.92.

IEEE Standard C57.13 recognizes two classes of insulation insofar

as resistance to temperature is concerned: (a) 55oC temperature rise
and (b) 80oC rise, both over a 30oC daily average ambient tempera-
ture. These values are the average temperature rise of the winding
(as measured by rise of resistance) during the temperature test at
rated maximum continuous current. The Guides for Loading recog-
nize that these temperatures can be considerably exceeded for short
periods of time without causing excessive deterioration of the insu-
lation (reference Section 10 of IEEE C57.13).

Maintenance and Inspection Instrument transformer users like to be able to make tests on new
Testing of Insulation transformers, as well as on transformers in service, to assure their
adequacy for service. It is rarely possible for the end user to make a
complete series of tests, but there are some things the user can do
for reassurance.

Measurement of the resistance of each winding to ground (when one

winding is measured, ground all other winding terminals) with a
megger will indicate if something has happened to reduce the resis-
tance values. Such an incident is most improbable on encapsulated
transformers. All ABB insulated current and voltage transformers
should have typical readings from the high voltage winding to the
low voltage winding, and ground above 1 Megohm per volt at 25oC.

Insulation resistance should be measured at ambient temperature

(not over 30oC) because it decreases rapidly at higher temperatures.

17
Technology Review

Voltage Ratings Current transformers are always rated at the line-to-line voltage of
the three-phase system on which they will operate. A 13.8 kV cur-
Voltage Ratings for rent transformer, for example, is designed for use on a 13.8 kV
three-phase system. The actual voltage from the current transformer
Current Transformer
primary winding to ground is only 13.8/Ö3 or 7.9 kV as shown in
Figure 13.

In the Transformer Standards IEEE C57.13, an insulation class,

which has the appearance of a system voltage rating, is associated
with each of the standard arrays of dielectric tests (60 Hertz and
impulse voltage). It has become standard practice to apply trans-
formers on systems with actual voltage higher than the insulation
class value. This is done on the basis that if the power system is de-
signed such (grounded, usually) that the line-to-ground voltage can
never be more than 70% or 80% of the line-to-line value, low-
er-voltage-rated lightning arresters can be used and the insulation is
protected from all the higher voltages to which it might otherwise
be subjected.

The transformer test voltages consist of a full wave impulse,

chopped waves, 60 Hertz applied, and induced voltage test accord-
ing to the schedule outlines in IEEE C57.13

Figure 13: Equivalent System Diagram

Whether or not this neutral is actually connected to ground, the natural symmetry of the circuit and the equal
line capacitors to ground will cause the neutral to assume ground potential.

18
 Technology Review

Voltage Ratings for Voltage The voltage which may be applied to a voltage transformer is lim-
Transformers ited not only by the permissible voltage to ground (as it is in a cur-
rent transformer) but by the insulation between turns, between lay-
ers, and coil sections. It is also limited by the ability of the core to
carry enough magnetic flux to induce the voltage. The voltage trans-
former is somewhat different from the distribution transformer, and
certainly from the power transformer, in having a very limited ca-
pacity to store energy.

Over Voltage Limits IEEE C57.13 recognizes three groups of voltage transformers for
different capabilities and connections. These groups are explained
by Figures 14, 15 and 16. There is also a fourth group which is
widely manufactured for use in certain switchgear.

All transformers, according to IEEE C57.13, are capable of operat-

ing continuously, and of maintaining their accuracy at 110% of
rated voltage. As indicated in the figures, Group 2 transformers need
do no more than this, and Group 1 transformers must be able to op-
erate (but not necessarily maintain accuracy) at 125% voltage dur-
ing emergencies, while Group 3 and 4 transformers must be able to
operate for one minute at line-to-line voltage, which is Ö3 times
their rating.

Figure 14: Application Limitation—Group 1 Voltage Transformers

19
Technology Review

Figure 15: Application Limitation—Group 2 Voltage Transformer

Figure 16: Application Limitation—Group 3 Voltage Transformers

These transformers have two secondary windings, one with a rating of 115 volts (except for the lowest rated 14400 for
25000 ground wye which is rated at 120 volts) and another secondary winding rated at approximately 115/Ö3 volts.
The value is not always exactly 115V/Ö3 because, for simplicity, the
primary/secondary voltage ratio is adjusted to a round number.

20
 Technology Review

Power Quality Power quality is an important consideration in designing any power

system. Distribution systems are especially vulnerable to power
quality problems. These problems should be taken into account
when selecting and purchasing equipment. Power quality issues
may be more pronounced in the US ANSI market than in Europe
IEC market because of the different nature of the two systems. Dis-
tances for power delivery, density of loads, and customer concentra-
tions are among the aspects that differ. Power quality problems in-
clude:

· voltage sags and dips

· momentary interruptions (flicker)
· harmonics (harmonic current and/or harmonic voltages)

Voltage Sags and Dips Voltage sags and dips are associated with switching or fault events
in the power system that cause voltages on adjacent or neighboring
circuits to partially collapse. These events can last from a few milli-
seconds to more than a second.

Momentary Interruptions Momentary interruptions are the same type of power system events
as voltage sags and dips, but are caused by lightning and other tran-
sients. The primary difference is that momentary interruptions occur
primarily in the circuits directly involved in the event rather than in
an adjacent circuit. Momentary interruptions are more severe power
quality problems than voltage sags and dips.

Figures 17A & 17B below show statistics of voltage sags and mo-
mentary interruptions in a typical ANSI power system.

Figures 17A & 17B: Distribution of RMS Events

A. Pie-chart showing the statistics of voltage sags and B Pie-chart showing the statistics of all PQ event types-note
interruptions-note most events (81%) are sags (between most events (68%) are single phase
0.5 pu and 0.9 pu)

21
Technology Review

Harmonics Harmonics are caused primarily by non-linear loads. The nature of

non-linear power equipment causes a perfectly sinusoidal voltage
waveform to result in currents containing other frequencies. A sinu-
soidal current can cause the generation of non-sinusoidal voltages.
Non-linear power equipment includes saturated transformers
(including instrument transformers), motors, and generators, but is
primarily associated with power electronics. The act of triggering or
switching a Silicon Controlled Rectifier (SCR), a diode, an Insu-
lated Gate Bipolar Transistor (IGBT), or a Gate Turn-Off device
(GTO), is in principle a non-linear operation. Power electronics de-
vices such as Adjustable Speed Drives (ASDs), or Variable Speed
Drives (VSDs) can sometimes exhibit a high level of harmonics,
often more than 100% Total Harmonic Distortion (THD). In the
case of ASDs, this level of harmonics varies with the selected rpm
of the motor, and mechanical load on the shaft.

Harmonics are unwanted events in distribution systems. They can

cause excessive heating and damage to neutral connections and ca-
bles, and can saturate instrument transformers. Harmonics may also
precipitate from the original location of the non-linear equipment to
other locations like feeders and loads. They also may cause false
tripping or malfunctioning of equipment, false readings from the
CTs and VTs especially sensitive relays, computer loads, other
ASDs, and Programmable Logic Controllers (PLCs).

There are a variety of techniques to mitigate and control the level of

harmonics, and industry standards regulating harmonics (see IEEE
519, Standard Practices and Requirements for Harmonic Control in
Electrical Power Systems, or IEC 555/1000-3). Possible mitigation
procedures include reconfiguring the system, re-sizing the cables or
transformers to include additional loading due to harmonic currents,
or installing filters and harmonic blockers. It is important to remem-
ber that these measures work for some, but not for all harmonics.
Often a comprehensive study has to be performed to determine the
level of harmonic currents, their impact on the power system, and
possible suppression measures.

In real systems, one disturbance in the system can cause a cascade

of other disturbances. For example, a lightning surge (fast overvolt-
age transient) traveling along an overhead feeder line can cause a
flashover and subsequent short circuit in a substation supplying an
industrial plant, which in turn can cause abnormal acceleration of a
local generator and so on.

22
 Technology Review

Service Conditions A voltage transformer is connected across the line or line-ground,

and is loaded to a greater or lesser degree depending on the number
Overload and Short-Circuit of devices connected in parallel at the secondary terminals (Figure
Capability 18). As the load is increased, the curves for ratio error and phase
angle will show how the accuracy is affected.

If accuracy is not important, the load can be increased to the thermal

volt-ampere rating, the maximum which can be carried without
overheating.

Voltage transformers must be able to withstand an accidental

short-circuit for one second.

A current transformer’s primary is connected in series with the line

and must carry whatever current flows in the line. The burden im-
pedance connected to the secondary terminals affects the accuracy,
as shown by the curves for ratio error and phase angle, but generally
has no significant effect on temperature.

Because watthour meters are usually capable of carrying at least

400% of rated current continuously, many of those current trans-
formers used almost exclusively with watthour meters have been
designed especially to carry two to four times normal current. Also
because many of those current transformers, used almost exclu-
sively in enclosed switchgear, must be designed to operate in a high
ambient temperature (55oC), they will carry 1.33 times normal cur-
rent in a normal (30oC daily average) ambient temperature. The fac-
tor designating the continuous current capacity in terms of rated cur-
rent at 30oC ambient is called thermal current rating factor. Standard
values are 1.33, 1.5, 2.0, 3.0 and 4.0. The continuous thermal rating
factor is based on 30oC average ambient temperature unless other-
wise noted.

The IEEE Guides for Loading recognize that transformer insulation

can withstand a considerable degree of overheating for a short time
without severe deterioration. For example, in the event of a line
short circuit, the fault current may easily be 50 times the rated cur-
rent of the current transformer, but will probably flow for not over
one second. IEEE C57.13 permits a 250oC temperature for this very
short time (compared to 95oC average continuous winding tempera-
ture). All current transformers are assigned a one-second thermal
current limit which denotes how much current they will carry
(usually denoted in terms of times normal rated current) for one sec-
ond. For durations up to five seconds, current transformers will
carry currents lower than this.

The transformer will carry more current for a time less than one sec-
ond according to the same rule, up to the mechanical current limit
(which is also given for standard current transformers.) At this limit
of current, the electromechanical forces tending to separate the pri-
mary and secondary coils, become high enough to damage the trans-
former.

23
Technology Review

The mechanical current limit is specified in terms of times normal

rated current, as is the thermal one-second limit, but it is always as-
sumed that the current may be fully offset initially. If it is known
that the current cannot be initially fully offset, the current trans-
former will be able to withstand mechanically a larger RMS value
of current, larger than its rated mechanical limit.

The temperature at these high currents and short times (less than
five seconds) cannot be measured, but is always calculated on the
basis that all heat generated by the current is stored in the copper for
the duration (not over five seconds) of the high current.

Currents higher than the rated value, but less than the five second
limit, can be determined by the rules set forth in the IEEE Guides
for Loading. The calculation for any given transformer is lengthy,
and as a general guide for standard transformers, the curves of Fig-
ure 18 can be used.

Figure 18: Overload Capability of Current Transformers

Time in Hours, Minutes, and seconds Following Full Load

Recommended guide for short time loading of current transformers following rated load for 0.1% loss of life.
Transformers so loaded will reach temperatures in excess of 55o C rise over ambient.
Loading according to this curve is not safe if the ambient exceeds 30o C on the average, or if the overload occurs more often than
once a day.

24
 Technology Review

Higher and Lower Ambient At temperatures over the standard 30oC, daily average ambient tem-
Temperatures perature current transformers should be derated 1% for each degree
over (up to 55oC ambient). At temperatures under 30oC, they may
be uprated 3/4% for each degree (down to 0oC).

Figure 19: Thermal Loading Guide 500

450

4.0

400

350

3.0

300

Percent of rated primary current

250

2.0

200

1.5
1.33
150

1.0

100

Curve designations are

continuous thermal current rating factors
at 30 deg. C ambient air temperature.
50

0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60

Average Ambient Cooling air temperature for 24 hour period, Degrees C.

(Maximum ambient air temperature shall not exceed average by more than 10 deg. C.)

Open-Circuit Voltage in Figure 2 shows that the line current must flow through the current
Current Transformers transformer, and Figure 4 shows that if the secondary circuit is acci-
dentally opened, all the current will have to pass through the excit-
ing current branches of the equivalent circuit. This will develop a
rather high voltage across the exciting branch, which will appear as
a high voltage at the secondary terminals. Because this voltage is
limited by saturation of the core, the RMS value measured by a
voltmeter may not appear to be dangerous. As the current cyclically
passes through zero, the rate of change of flux at current zero is not
limited by saturation, and is very high indeed. This induces ex-
tremely high peaks or pulses of voltage.

These high peaks of voltage may not register on the conventional

voltmeter, but they can break down insulation and are dangerous to
personnel. Current transformers are insulated to withstand, for
emergency operation, secondary peak voltages up to 3500 volts.
This takes care of the smaller transformers with relay accuracy class
under T200, but if open-circuit of larger transformers is probable,
some protective circuit should be permanently connected to the sec-
ondary terminals. In general, open-circuit of the secondary terminals
should be considered as a serious accident.

The actual open-circuit voltage peak is difficult to measure accu-

rately because it exists only as very short peaks. The method out-
lined in the Test Methods Section of IEEE C57.13 represents an ex-
cellent compromise between precision and feasibility.

25
Technology Review

Permanent Magnetization If a system short-circuit occurs, with a current of several times nor-
of Current Transformer mal, the voltage at the burden may be rather high. The flux density
in the equivalent exciting reactance (the core of the current trans-
Cores
former) may be high enough that if the fault current is abruptly in-
terrupted, the core may be permanently magnetized at a fairly high
flux density.

If the secondary circuit of the current transformer is accidentally

opened, the flux density will become very high and even if the cir-
cuit is immediately closed again, the core may be left with perma-
nent magnetization.

When normal current and flux variation is restored, the flux varia-
tion starts from the residual value and varies somewhat as shown in
Figure 20. If the flux starts to increase from point a, the flux varia-
tion cannot be maintained in loop a-A in Figure 20, because such a
loop would require direct current to maintain it in its offset position.
The flux loop must shift down to the symmetrical (around the verti-
cal axis) loop c-C. As it shifts down it actually generates a small
direct current in the secondary circuit. The secondary burden will
establish the rate of change. The flux variation will stay in this loop
indefinitely.

The slope of the loop c-C will be less than the slope of the normal,
completely symmetrical loop at the origin The peak exciting current
S1´ will be higher than the normal exciting current S1. If the alter-
nating flux density increases, the hysteresis loop moves to d-D and
the slope of this loop becomes nearly equal to the symmetrical loop.
The exciting current S2´ is still greater than the symmetrical value,
but not as much greater in percent, as the difference between S1´
and S1.

The final result is that the effective exciting current, which causes
ratio error and phase angle, is increased if the core becomes perma-
nently magnetized. This will usually cause no more than 0.1% and 3
minutes of additional error in practical metering transformers at me-
tering burdens10. The difference is less dependent on burden and
current than might be expected. This is because the increase in ex-
citing current from permanent magnetism is less at low flux varia-
tion, and moves to a constant ampere-turn value as the flux variation
increases.

If precision measurement of ratio and phase angle is important, es-

pecially if ratio and phase angle measurements made at different
times or in different laboratories are to be compared, demagnetiza-
tion of the core by the conventional method of applying an alternat-
ing voltage high enough to circulate rated current in the secondary
winding, reducing it gradually to zero, is desirable. (See IEEE
C57.13).
10.
At 100% current

26
 Technology Review

Figure 20: Permanent Magnetism in Current Transformers

To allow loop a-A to exist, a direct current must flow, requiring a DC voltage. This in turn requires a downward change in
flux to induce it, with the result that the loop shifts down to c-C which is symmetrical about the vertical axis and requires
no direct current. Operation is stable over this loop. The iron is permanently magnetized by having been at point a, and the
loop c-C will not of itself shift down further. Imposition of a still higher AC flux variation will cause the larger loop d-D,
shifted down from c-C. A very high flux density will restore the original symmetrical loop y-Y.

27
Technology Review

Voltage Transformer An ungrounded system is always actually grounded, although per-

Connected Line-to- haps very poorly, by the capacitance and resistance of its insulation
Ground on an Otherwise to-ground, as shown in Figure 22. If a voltage transformer is con-
nected from one line to-ground, it is in effect connected in parallel
Ungrounded System with a capacitor. The equivalent circuit is shown in Figure 22. Fig-
ure 22 also shows how parallel resonance can occur between trans-
former and capacitor, and how it can cause a very high voltage with
destruction of the voltage transformer. If examination of a voltage
transformer which has failed, shows only the primary winding uni-
formly roasted from end-to-end, gross over excitation is undoubt-
edly the cause and "ferro-resonance" can be suspected. It is called
ferro-resonance because this resonance depends on partial saturation
of an iron core.

The number of combinations of constants which can cause fer-

ro-resonance is large, and the analysis of the circuit and prediction
of possible destructive voltage is not simple. For ABB transformers
of present and foreseeable future manufacture, this works out as
shown in Figure 21.

These high loadings may cause errors greater than 0.3%, but a trans-
former connected line-to-ground on an ungrounded system would
never be used for accurate metering anyway (units connected line-
to-line should be used instead). If three transformers are connected
in Y, the secondaries should never be connected in Delta.

Figure 21: Watt Loading - Ferro-resonance Prevention

Approx. Ohms
Watt Loading on Connected Across
Voltage Class Equivalent
Secondary to Prevent Corner of Broken
(Primary) Resistance per
Ferro-resonance Delta
Phase (120 V)

To 500 200 72 216

7200-15000 500 29 87
25000 & up 750 20 60

28
 Technology Review

Figure 22: Ferro-resonance Voltage Transformers

A. Line-to-ground capacitance circuit

B. Equivalent Y circuit

C. Approximate possible curve of current (neglecting resistance components) showing that at some
particular value of voltage (Ep) the capacitor and transformer’s reactive current total zero, represent-
ing infinite impedance, with the result that the voltage-to-ground on this line may reach Ep. This is a
high enough value that excessive exciting current will burn out the primary winding.

29
Technology Review

Auxiliary Current Many circuit problems can be solved by connecting one current
Transformers transformer to supply another current transformer, usually called an
Auxiliary current transformer, shown in Figure 23.

Auxiliary current transformers perform like other current transform-

ers, but there are certain problems associated with their use which
merit discussion.

First, the auxiliary current transformer constitutes an additional bur-

den on the main current transformer, which usually increases the
errors of the main current transformer.

Secondly, the performance of auxiliary current transformers is not

usually as good as the performance of main current transformers.
This is because the auxiliary current transformer is designed to im-
pose as small a burden as possible on the main current transformer.
This means its own burden capacity must be relatively low.

These two considerations mean that the errors of transformation

when an auxiliary current transformer is used, will typically be three
times the value which might be expected with single transformer.
However, the special functions which can be performed by the aux-
iliary current transformer as indicated in Figure 23 often dictate
their use.

Figure 23: Auxiliary Current Transformers

30
 Technology Review

Fusing Voltage Primary fuses are used with voltage transformers mainly to take the
Transformers transformer off the line in the event of an internal failure. This pre-
vents a failed VT from becoming an L-G fault which requires the
breaker to interrupt the customer’s electric service.

Since modern transformers are much more reliable than older ones,
the fuses may never operate due to internal transformer failure.
Transformer failure may still be caused by overload or short circuit
on the secondary. If such failure occurs, it may involve other appa-
ratuses, perhaps causing an outage.

Modern fuses are more substantial and reliable than older fuses, so
the chance of fuse failure is smaller. Only the exceptional installa-
tion will be so dependent on continuity of voltage, that the trans-
former must be connected solidly to the primary circuit. With mod-
ern fuses, the principal disadvantages are the cost of fuses and
mounting, and the space required.

Most primary fuses will also protect the transformer against partial
short circuit in the primary winding and against secondary short cir-
cuit. Some operators choose fuses which will not operate on secon-
dary short circuit.

All voltage transformer fuses will interrupt only a certain maximum

fault current. The so-called current limiting fuses have higher inter-
rupting ratings and can, in most cases, be used without external re-
sistors to limit the current.

Primary fuses may be mounted on indoor transformers at the fac-

tory, or in separate mountings. Generally, this would increase the
cost and the space required for installation.

Whether to use fuses or not is determined by the operator’s estab-

lished practice, but, apparently, operation without fuses has proven
satisfactory in the majority of installations. The same considerations
apply for outdoor transformers, but separately mounted fuses in
their own mountings must be used. They are not mounted on the
transformer.

The use of secondary fuses is relatively rare and is a matter of per-

sonal choice with the operator. Such fuses should be rated so that
they will carry the secondary current indicated by the thermal VA
rating of the transformer, but should blow in a short time at any
higher current to protect the transformer. Obviously, if blowing or
mechanical failure of a fuse occurs and is not quickly detected, a
considerable loss of revenue or protection may occur.

31
Technology Review

New Technologies The technology of measuring the voltage and current is continu-
ously improving.

New Materials Materials used for encapsulating CTs and VTs are continuously im-
proving. Advancements in material science lead to the continuing
improvements:

· increased dielectric properties so the same voltage rating can be

achieved with less material and smaller designs
· increased resistance to arcing and surface tracking
· reduced corona and partial discharge (pD)
· increased mechanical strength of the unit
· increased resistance to environmental conditions (particularly
important for outdoor applications)
· increased longevity and stability of the material so the same
electrical and mechanical properties can be maintained during
a long service life
· increased thermal handling properties so the same current rat-
ings can be achieved with less material and lower stresses on
joints, inter-turn insulation, and corners, etc.

New Sensing Technologies Parallel to the instrument transformers, the new techniques of meas-
uring voltage and current are becoming commercially available.

Voltage Sensing
Resistive voltage dividers are becoming a commercially viable al-
ternative to measuring voltage. Although they draw slightly larger
(resistive) current, they can be embedded in a cast of solid dielectric
material (such as epoxy or polyurethane) and provide a stable output
in a wide frequency range, including high harmonics. The voltage
from the resistive divider is equal to:

R SEC
V SEC = V PRI *
R PRI + R SEC
Capacitive voltage dividers have been in high voltage testing for a
long time. They provide a stable output proportional to the ratio of
capacitances.

C PRI
VSEC = VPRI *
C PRI + CSEC
Capacitive voltage dividers have very high inherent impedance so
they have to be connected to a high-impedance (light) burden. With
the advancement of electronic relays and meters, this is becoming a
commercially viable option for some applications.

Optical voltage sensors are becoming available for high voltage ap-
plications where the insulation line-to-ground is a major concern.
Optical voltage sensors are based on the electro-optical phenome-

32
 Technology Review

non called Kerr effect by which a light-wave is polarized depending

on the electric field generated by the voltage in the system. The
technology is available to be used in distribution systems as well,
but some improvements in cost and complexity of the optical sys-
tems are still needed.

Current Sensing Rogowski coils or linear couplers are essentially air-core transform-
ers that use a power conductor as a primary winding, and an air-core
coil wrapped around it as secondary. The difference is that the pri-
mary current induces a secondary voltage signal in the Rogowski
coil (not a current), which is a proportional derivative of the primary
current dI/dt. This requires some careful processing of the dI/dt sig-
nal to convert to the true measurement of the primary current.
Again, with the advancement of the electronic signal processing,
these devices are now commercially available. Rogowski coils are
very linear and do not saturate, even under extreme current condi-
tions and high frequencies.

Magneto-optical phenomenon, called Faraday’s effect, can be used

to measure the current as well. When polarized light passes around
the conductor with the current, the magnetic field associated with
the current changes the polarization angle of the light. The change
can be measured optically and converted to the electrical signal,
proportional to the primary current. Optical transducers are inher-
ently good for very high voltages since they do not require any elec-
trical connection to the primary phase conductors. The devices are
linear over their entire current range.

33
 Product Description

Product Description

General Description .................................................................................................36

Contemporary Design ..............................................................................................37

Current Transformers .............................................................................................39

Voltage Transformers ..............................................................................................41

35
Product Description

General Description ABB offers a complete line of instrument transformers from 600 V
to 34.5 kV. In the 600 V class, ABB manufactures current trans-
formers (CTs) and voltage transformers (VTs), using both thermo-
plastic rubber and plastic casings. In the 5-34 kV category, ABB
provides a wide range of indoor and outdoor CTs and VTs cast in
polyurethane, using a new state-of-the-art casting process. Also of-
fered are specialty items such as linear couplers, bushing type, and
ring type CTs. ABB builds transformers to ANSI, IEEE, CSA, IEC,
Australian and other specifications. ISO-9001 certification was re-
ceived from UL on November 29, 1995. ISO-14001 certification
was received on August 31, 2000.

ABB instrument transformers are manufactured in Pinetops, North

Carolina. The Pinetops operation began in 1978 and is considered a
worldwide center of excellence for instrument transformers. The
operation is widely recognized for its success in on-time deliveries,
short lead-times, focus on quality and customer responsiveness. On
going operations initiatives include:
· Customer Responsiveness
· Focused Factory
· Investments in New Equipment
· Productivity Improvement
· Inventory Reduction
· Manufacturing Cycle Time Reduction

36
 Product Description

Contemporary Design The ABB instrument transformer family of products consists of :

· Urethane - Cast
· Plastic - Encased
· Thermoplatic Rubber - Molded
· Rings - Wound

Voltage ranges are defined as low voltage under 700 V and medium
voltage 1.2 kV thru 36 kV.

Urethane · Current and Voltage Transformers

· Voltage Class (1.2 kV to 36 kV)
· Basic Impulse Level - 60 kV to 200 kV BIL
· Application:
Þ Indoor and Outdoor
Þ Utilities - Substations
Þ Switchgear
* Primary Revenue Metering
* Protection

37
Product Description

Plastic · Current Transformers, Window Type

· Voltage Class (600 V)
· Application
Þ Distribution Circuit Breakers (Switchgear and Outdoor
Vacuum Breakers)

Thermoplastic Rubber · Current and Voltage Transformers

· Voltage Class (600 V)
· Basic Impulse Level - 10 kV
· Application
Þ Indoor and Outdoor
Þ Utilities - Substations
* Secondary Revenue Metering

Rings · Current Transformers

· Voltage Class (600 V)
· Varnished Dipped
Þ Vacuum Impregnated
· Application
Þ Power Transformers
Þ Power Circuit Breakers

38
 Product Description

The industry commonly classifies instrument transformers in families

of current transformers (CTs) and voltage transformers (VTs) and
these categories are further broken down by indoor or outdoor applica-
tion.

Current Transformers · Used for Medium Voltage Switchgear

Þ Free Standing
Outdoor (600 V—34.5 kV) · Dielectric Types
Þ Polyurethane
· Current Ratio
Þ Prim: 5-1200A (Single/dual ratio)
Þ Sec: 1 or 5A
· Accuracy Class
Þ Metering 0.3 B-1.8 or 30VA class 0.2
Þ Relay C 200 or 30VA 5P20

39
Product Description

Indoor (600 V-25 kV) · Used for Medium Voltage Switchgear

Þ Circuit Breaker (DCB)
Þ Metering Enclosures
· Dielectric Types
Þ Thermoplastic Rubber (TPR)
Þ Plastic Case
· Current Ratio
Þ Prim: 50-6000A (Single/dual/multi-ratio)
Þ Sec: 1 or 5A
· Accuracy Class
Þ Metering 0.3 B-1.8 or 30VA class 0.2
Þ Relay C400 or 30VA 5P20

40
 Product Description

Voltage Transformers · Used for Medium Voltage Switchgear

Þ Y is for line-line or line-ground application
Outdoor (5-34.5 kV)
Þ GY is only for line-ground application
· Dielectric Types
Þ Polyurethane
· Voltage Ratio
Þ 2400-24000:120 V
· Accuracy Class
Þ Metering 0.3 Y or 30VA class 0.2

Indoor (600 V) · Used for Medium Voltage Switchgear

Þ Metering Enclosures
· Dielectric Types
Þ Thermoplastic Rubber (TPR)
· Voltage Ratio
Þ 600:120 V
· Accuracy Class
Þ Metering 0.3 Y or 30VA class 0.2

Summary A number of considerations are involved in selecting proper instru-

ment transformers. Many of the transformer types have similar char-
acteristics, but each type has its own unique combination of features
that best meet the application for which it is designed.

41
ABB Power Distribution
655 Century Point
Lake Mary, FL 32746
1-800-929-7947
Fax 407-732-2132
www.abb.com/distribution