488 IEEE ANTENNAS AND WIRELESS PROPAGATION LETTERS, VOL.

10, 2011

A Compact Monopole Antenna for

Super Wideband Applications
Ke-Ren Chen, Chow-Yen-Desmond Sim, Member, IEEE, and Jeen-Sheen Row

Abstract—A planar microstrip-fed super wideband monopole

antenna is initially proposed. By embedding a semielliptically
fractal-complementary slot into the asymmetrical ground plane,
a 10-dB bandwidth of 172% (1.44–18.8 GHz) is achieved with
ratio bandwidth 12:1. Furthermore, the proposed antenna also
demonstrated a wide 14-dB bandwidth from 5.4 to 12.5 GHz,
which is suitable for UWB outdoor propagation. This proposed
antenna is able to cover the DVB-H in -band (for PMP), DCS,
PCS, UMTS, Bluetooth, WiMAX2500, LTE2600, and UWB bands.
Index Terms—Bandwidth dimension ratio (BDR), fractal-com-
plementary, monopole antenna, super wideband (SWB).

I. INTRODUCTION

B ESIDES exploiting the ultrawideband (UWB) operating

band from 3.1 to 10.6 GHz for wireless personal area
network (WPAN) applications [1], the current users of WPAN
are also eagerly demanding a super wideband (SWB) to cover
both short- and long-range transmitting for ubiquitous services.
Fig. 1. Geometry of the proposed monopole antenna (unit: millimeters).
However, limited numbers of SWB antennas are reported in the
open literature [2]–[7], and the existing UWB antennas are not
efficient enough for diversified communication systems. refers to the lower-end frequency that meets the 10-dB return
The present requirement for SWB antennas is to provide loss. To meet the compact requirements, a printed semielliptical
at least a ratio bandwidth of 10:1 impedance bandwidth at SWB antenna with electrical dimension of and a
10-dB return loss. Hence, to achieve a ratio bandwidth up to ratio bandwidth of 19.7:1 is introduced [7]. However, this SWB
10.43:1 for a conventional rectangular-shaped coplanar wave- antenna only operates between 0.46–0.97 GHz, which therefore
guide (CPW)-fed monopole antenna, a restructured tapering does not provide enough coverage for the UWB applications.
ground plane with a top-loaded notched radiating element In this letter, a novel compact-size SWB antenna (also cov-
design is proposed [2]. Since the structure of the aforemen- ering the UWB spectrum) with electrical dimensions
tioned antenna is too complicated, other simple-structured is proposed. By embedding a fractal-complementary slot
SWB antenna designs such as the circular [3] or near-elliptical into the asymmetrical ground plane, the proposed antenna is
monopole antenna [4] with ratio bandwidth up to 21.25:1 and able to operate from 1.44 to 18.8 GHz with ratio bandwidth up to
25.00:1 are studied, respectively. Although the elliptical [5] and 13.06: 1. The design and effects of this fractal-complementary
PICA [6] slot antennas design are also able to satisfy the SWB slot will be discussed in detail via simulation. Typical experi-
requirement by demonstrating a ratio bandwidth of 15.38:1 and mental results of the proposed antenna are also measured and
13.63:1, respectively, their corresponding electrical dimensions compared to its simulated counterparts.
are and . Here, the wavelength
II. ANTENNA DESIGN
Manuscript received March 15, 2011; revised April 24, 2011; accepted May The design of the proposed egg-shaped monopole antenna is
12, 2011. Date of publication May 19, 2011; date of current version May 31, depicted in Fig. 1. It is printed off-center along the -axis on a
2011.
K.-R. Chen is with the Department of Electronic Engineering, Chung Chou
1.6-mm-thick FR4 substrate (permittivity 4.4 and loss tangent
Institute of Technology, Yuanlin 510, Taiwan (e-mail: keren@dragon.ccut.edu. 0.02) with dimension 35 77 mm . To achieve impedance
tw). matching that results in bandwidth enhancement, the technique
C.-Y.-D. Sim is with the Department of Electrical Engineering, Feng Chia
University, Taichung 40724, Taiwan (e-mail: cysim@fcu.edu.tw).
of loading a triangular notch at the feeding position in the
J.-S. Row is with the Department of Electrical Engineering, National ground plane (35 43 mm ) is introduced [8], [9]. To allow the
Changhua University of Education, Chang-Hua 500, Taiwan (e-mail: SWB antenna to operate in a much lower frequency band of less
jsrow@cc.ncue.edu.tw). than 1.5 GHz, a semielliptical fractal-complementary slot is
Color versions of one or more of the figures in this letter are available online
at http://ieeexplore.ieee.org. embedded into the ground plane. Note that the physical concept
Digital Object Identifier 10.1109/LAWP.2011.2157071 of introducing this slot into the ground plane is to reduce the
1536-1225/$26.00 © 2011 IEEE
CHEN et al.: COMPACT MONOPOLE ANTENNA FOR SUPER WIDEBAND APPLICATIONS 489

ground plane effect by suppressing the electric currents on the

ground plane at lower-end operating frequency since the radia-
tion from the ground plane is inevitable as electric current will
distribute on both the radiating element (egg-shaped monopole)
and the ground plane [10].
The fractal shapes of the semielliptical slot are character-
ized by two factors: the iteration order (IO) and the iteration
factor (IF). The IO shows the number of iteration processes that
are carried out, and the IF represents the construction law of
fractal geometry generation. To determine the IF coefficient be-
tween the subconfiguration and original configuration on the
ground plane, the following equation is used:

(1)
Fig. 2. Simulated return losses of the two reference antennas (IO = 0; IO =
1) and the proposed antenna (IO = 2).
where and is defined as the major axis of original
configuration and subconfiguration radius in (1), respectively.
Here, the optimum IF values are mm and
mm . Note that the IO of the fractal-complemen-
tary slot is limited to 2 because of the manufacturing tolerance.

III. BANDWIDTH DIMENSION RATIO

The most conventional method to confirm the compactness of
one wideband (UWB/SWB) antenna against the other is to com-
pare their corresponding electrical dimension .
However, each UWB/SWB antenna published in the open liter-
ature is unique, and their bandwidth measured along 10-dB re-
turn loss will not be exactly the same, not to mention that their
starting frequencies (lower-end frequency, ) are most likely
to be different. Unlike the UWB antenna that has a standard op- Fig. 3. Measured return losses of the proposed antenna and reference 1 antenna.
erating bandwidth that begins at 3.1 GHz, so that most authors
can refer to this frequency as the corresponding electrical di-
mension of their UWB antenna, the SWB antenna does not have 2) the differences in the substrate’s relative permittivity must be
such an operating band standard. as small as possible, so that the accuracy in comparing the com-
Hence, to provide an equitable comparison between two pactness between two wideband antennas by applying the BDR
wideband antennas (especially UWB antenna), the authors can be reliable.
have defined a new index term that will allow antenna engineers
to identify if their planar antenna design (compared against IV. RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS
the other design) is very much compact in size and wide in The optimized dimensions and impedance matching of the
bandwidth. Here, to determine both the compactness and wide- proposed antenna is achieved by employing the commercially
band characteristics of a planar antenna, an antenna index term available electromagnetic software simulator HFSS [11]. To
named the bandwidth dimension ratio (BDR) is introduced. fully comprehend how the fractal-complementary slot will aid
This index term will indicate how much operating bandwidth in shifting the lower-end operating frequency to the lower band
(in percentage) can be provided per electrical area unit. The and improving the 10-dB impedance bandwidth of the proposed
equation is written as follows: antenna with IF value fixed at 0.42, the simulated return losses
of the proposed antenna with fractal-complementary slot of dif-
(2) ferent IO embedded into the ground plane are investigated and
shown in Fig. 2. Here, similar results are obtained when
where is the wavelength of the lower-end operating frequency and . However, when loaded with a second-order
that meets the 10-dB return loss. Here, a larger BDR will in- IO fractal-complementary slot, the lower-end frequency of
dicate that the design antenna is smaller in dimension and wider the proposed antenna is shifted to 1.44 GHz from 1.74 GHz.
in bandwidth. Except for a slight notch observed between 2–3-GHz bands,
Notably, since the relative permittivity of the substrate used this proposed technique is feasible if a lower operating band is
by the antennas is not considered in (2), thus when applying the required for a wideband antenna.
BDR for comparing the compactness between two wideband an- The measured return losses of the proposed and reference 1
tennas of dissimilar structures and sizes, two conditions must be antenna are presented in Fig. 3. By comparing these results to
observed: 1) the antennas must be of (planar) printed type; and the simulated ones in Fig. 2, good agreement is demonstrated
490 IEEE ANTENNAS AND WIRELESS PROPAGATION LETTERS, VOL. 10, 2011

TABLE I
BANDWIDTH, ELECTRICAL DIMENSION, AND BDR INDEX COMPARISON

especially on the lower-end frequency, whereby a shifted fre-

quency from 1.74 to 1.44 GHz is observed. Here, the 10-dB
bandwidth of the proposed antenna is 172% (from 1.44 to
18.8 GHz), and a ratio bandwidth of 13.06:1 is calculated.
Therefore, besides the ability to cover the Digital Cellular
System (DCS), Personal Communications System (PCS),
Universal Mobile Telecommunication System (UMTS), Blue-
tooth, Worldwide Interoperability for Microwave Access
2500 (WiMAX2500), Long-Term Evolution 2600 (LTE2600),
and UWB spectrums, the proposed antenna can also cover
the operating spectrum of digital video broadcasting-hand-
held (DVB-H) in -band (1452–1492 MHz) for the portable
media player (PMP) applications.
Although the reference 1 antenna may have a larger 10-dB
bandwidth measured from 1.74 up to 20 GHz, the proposed
antenna has demonstrated a wide 14-dB operating band-
width from 5.4 to 12.5 GHz . Notably,
to allow a much larger tolerance in impedance matching
when encountering an adverse changing environment, such
as placing the antenna near to a human head, metal desk, or
metal device [12], [13], it is always a good practice to allow Fig. 4. Measured radiation patterns in two principal planes at (a) 1.7, (b) 3.0,
the bandwidth of the antenna to operate below the 14-dB (c) 6.0, and (d) 9.0 GHz.
return-loss threshold. Furthermore, such specification is also
dedicated for outdoor propagation in the UWB system. Hence,
the proposed antenna (with 5.4–12.5 GHz below the 14-dB
return-loss threshold) is suitable for operation in the direct
sequence (DS) at high band (5.825–10.6 GHz) and multiband
orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (MB-OFDM)
at higher eleven subcarrier bands (5.9–10.6 GHz) for UWB
outdoor propagation [1].
To ensure equitable comparison between the proposed an-
tenna and the antennas design studied [2]–[6] (all reference an-
tennas cover the UWB spectrum), their performances such as
ratio bandwidth, 10-dB bandwidth, electrical dimension, and
BDR (unit: are compiled and presented in Table I. Al-
though the proposed antenna may not have a better ratio band-
width as compared to the references, however, good BDR of
2735 with smaller electrical dimension of is ex-
hibited. Therefore, the proposed SWB antenna can offer good Fig. 5. Simulated and measured gain variation of proposed antenna.
compact characteristic while maintaining a much smaller di-
mension than the designs in [2]–[6].
The measured far-field radiation patterns of the proposed an- electric current (with short wavelength) distribution on the pro-
tenna at 1.7, 3, 6, and 9 GHz are depicted in Fig. 4. Near om- posed antenna. Presented in Fig. 5 is the simulated and measured
nidirectional radiation characteristics are observed in the az- peak gain variation of the proposed antenna. Good agreement
imuth plane at 1.3- and 3-GHz bands. As for the upper band at between the two results is exhibited along 1–12 GHz. Here, a
6 and 9 GHz, the cross-polarization level rises with increasing raising gain from 1 to 7 dBi is measured with small fluctuation
frequency, whereby this phenomenon is due to the diversified in between frequencies.
CHEN et al.: COMPACT MONOPOLE ANTENNA FOR SUPER WIDEBAND APPLICATIONS 491

V. CONCLUSION [5] E. S. Angelopoulos, A. Z. Anastopoulos, D. I. Kaklamani, A. A.

Alexandridis, F. Lazarakis, and K. Dang, “Circular and elliptical
An egg-shaped SWB monopole antenna loaded with a fractal- CPW-fed slot and microstrip-fed antennas for ultrawideband appli-
complementary slot into its ground plane is successfully imple- cations,” IEEE Antennas Wireless Propag. Lett., vol. 5, pp. 294–297,
mented with good compact characteristic. Besides exhibiting 2006.
[6] S. Cheng, P. Hallbjörner, and A. Rydberg, “Printed slot planar inverted
a 10-dB bandwidth of 172% with 13.06:1 ratio bandwidth, a cone antenna for ultrawideband applications,” IEEE Antennas Wireless
14-dB bandwidth (low return loss) of 79% is also demonstrated Propag. Lett., vol. 7, pp. 18–21, 2008.
in the higher UWB operating bands for outdoor propagation. A [7] X. R. Yan, S. S. Zhong, and X. L. Liang, “Compact printed semi-el-
liptical monopole antenna for super-wideband applications,” Microw.
new BDR index term is also obtained here to identify the com- Opt. Technol. Lett., vol. 49, no. 9, pp. 2061–2063, Sep. 2007.
pactness of the proposed antenna. The presented antenna is able [8] C. Y. Huang and W. C. Hsia, “Planar elliptical antenna for ultra-wide-
to cover both short- and long-range transmitting for ubiquitous band communications,” Electron. Lett., vol. 41, no. 6, pp. 296–297,
2005.
communication services. [9] K. H. Kim and S. O. Park, “Design of the band-rejected UWB antenna
with the ring-shaped parasitic patch,” Microw. Opt. Technol. Lett., vol.
REFERENCES 48, no. 7, pp. 1310–1313, Jul. 2006.
[1] “Report of the Spectrum Efficiency Working Group,” FCC Spectrum [10] Z. N. Chen, T. S. P. See, and X. Qing, “Small printed ultrawideband
Policy Task Force, Tech. Rep., 2002. antenna with reduced ground plane effect,” IEEE Trans. Antennas
[2] C. Deng, Y. J. Xie, and P. Li, “CPW-fed planar printed monopole an- Propag., vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 383–388, Feb. 2007.
tenna with impedance bandwidth enhanced,” IEEE Antennas Wireless [11] Ansoft HFSS, 3D EM-field simulation for high performance electronic
Propag. Lett., vol. 8, pp. 1394–1397, 2009. design. ver. 11, Ansoft Corp., Pittsburgh, PA, 2008.
[3] X. L. Liang, S. S. Zhong, and W. Wang, “UWB printed circular [12] Z. N. Chen, A. Cai, T. S. P. See, X. Qing, and M. Y. W. Chia, “Small
monopole antenna,” Microw. Opt. Technol. Lett., vol. 51, no. 4, pp. planar UWB antennas in proximity of the human head,” IEEE Trans.
1532–1534, Aug. 2006. Antennas Propag., vol. 56, no. 12, pp. 3844–3849, Dec. 2008.
[4] Y. Dong, W. Hong, L. Liu, Y. Zhang, and Z. Kuai, “Performance anal- [13] B. S. Yildirim, B. A. Cetiner, G. Roqueta, and L. Jofre, “Integrated
ysis of a printed super-wideband antenna,” Microw. Opt. Technol. Lett., Bluetooth and UWB antenna,” IEEE Antennas Wireless Propag. Lett.,
vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 949–956, Apr. 2009. vol. 8, pp. 149–152, 2009.