Federal Aviation Administration
Federal Aviation Administration
Federal Aviation Administration
Agency overview
Formed August 23, 1958
Preceding Agency Civil Aeronautics Administration
Jurisdiction United States federal government
800 Independence Avenue SW Washington
DC, 20591
Headquarters
38°53′14.31″N 77°1′19.98″W
/ 38.8873083°N 77.0222167°W
Annual budget 15.956 billion USD (FY2010)
Michael Huerta, Administrator
Agency executives
Michael Whitaker, Deputy Administrator
Parent agency U.S. Department of Transportation
Website www.FAA.gov
• The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is
the national aviation authority of the United
States. An agency of the United States
Department of Transportation, it has authority
to regulate and oversee all aspects of
American civil aviation. The Federal Aviation Act
of 1958 created the organization under the
name Federal Aviation Agency. The agency
adopted its current name in 1966 when it
became a part of the U.S. Department of
Transportation.
Major functions
• The FAA's roles include:
• Regulating U.S. commercial space transportation
• Regulating air navigation facilities' geometry and flight
inspection standards
• Encouraging and developing civil aeronautics, including new
aviation technology
• Issuing, suspending, or revoking pilot certificates
• Regulating civil aviation to promote safety, especially through
local offices called Flight Standards District Offices
• Developing and operating a system of air traffic control and
navigation for both civil and military aircraft
• Researching and developing the National Airspace
System and civil aeronautics
• Developing and carrying out programs to control aircraft
noise and other environmental effects of civil aviation
Organizations[edit]
The FAA is divided into four "lines of business"
(LOB).[3] Each LOB has a specific role within the FAA.
• The FAA has been cited as an example of regulatory capture, "in which the
airline industry openly dictates to its regulators its governing rules, arranging
for not only beneficial regulation but placing key people to head these
regulators."[17] Retired NASA Office of Inspector General Senior Special
Agent Joseph Gutheinz, who formerly was a Special Agent with both the U.S.
Department of Transportation Office of Inspector General and FAA Security,
is one of the most outspoken critics of FAA. Rather than commend the
agency for proposing a 10.2 million dollar fine against Southwest Airlines for
its failure to conduct mandatory inspections in 2008, he was quoted as
saying the following in an Associated Press story: "Penalties against airlines
that violate FAA directives should be stiffer. At $25,000 per violation, (which
is how the 10.2 million dollar figure was reached) Gutheinz said, airlines can
justify rolling the dice and taking the chance on getting caught. He also said
the FAA is often too quick to bend to pressure from airlines and
pilots."[12] Other experts have been critical of the constraints and
expectations under which the FAA is expected to operate. The dual role of
encouraging aerospace travel and regulating aerospace travel are counter
intuitive. For example, to levy a heavy penalty upon an airline for violating
an FAA regulation which would impact their ability to continue operating
would not be considered encouraging aerospace travel.
• On July 22, 2008, in the aftermath of the Southwest Airlines
inspection scandal, a bill was unanimously approved in the House to
tighten regulations concerning airplane maintenance procedures,
including the establishment of a whistleblower office and a two-year
"cooling off" period that FAA inspectors or supervisors of inspectors
must wait before they can work for those they regulated.[11][18] The
bill also required rotation of principal maintenance inspectors and
stipulated that the word "customer" properly applies to the flying
public, not those entities regulated by the FAA.[11] The bill died in a
Senate committee that year.[19]