Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 834 views

    CAPA Incomplete Part Mix

    Uploaded by

    Rohtash fastner
    I. After analyzing production records and defective parts, it was found that 1st and 2nd station setting parts were mixing with finished good parts because the setting parts were staying in a small catch pan. II. The root cause was determined to be that the small catch pan was not cleared before running mass production, which led to the setting parts mixing with finished good parts. III. Corrective actions included developing work instructions for proper handling of setting parts, displaying quality alerts, and training operators on defect awareness to prevent future mixing issues.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    CAPA Incomplete Part Mix

    Uploaded by

    Rohtash fastner
    834 views16 pages
    I. After analyzing production records and defective parts, it was found that 1st and 2nd station setting parts were mixing with finished good parts because the setting parts were staying in a small catch pan. II. The root cause was determined to be that the small catch pan was not cleared before running mass production, which led to the setting parts mixing with finished good parts. III. Corrective actions included developing work instructions for proper handling of setting parts, displaying quality alerts, and training operators on defect awareness to prevent future mixing issues.

    Original Description:

    rfgtrg

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    I. After analyzing production records and defective parts, it was found that 1st and 2nd station setting parts were mixing with finished good parts because the setting parts were staying in a small catch pan. II. The root cause was determined to be that the small catch pan was not cleared before running mass production, which led to the setting parts mixing with finished good parts. III. Corrective actions included developing work instructions for proper handling of setting parts, displaying quality alerts, and training operators on defect awareness to prevent future mixing issues.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
    834 views16 pages

    CAPA Incomplete Part Mix

    Uploaded by

    Rohtash fastner
    I. After analyzing production records and defective parts, it was found that 1st and 2nd station setting parts were mixing with finished good parts because the setting parts were staying in a small catch pan. II. The root cause was determined to be that the small catch pan was not cleared before running mass production, which led to the setting parts mixing with finished good parts. III. Corrective actions included developing work instructions for proper handling of setting parts, displaying quality alerts, and training operators on defect awareness to prevent future mixing issues.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
    of 16

    ROHTAS FASTE

    SUPPLIER / IN-PLANT QUALITY PROBLEM ANAL


    VENDOR / DEPTT : Inhouse

    PROBLEM Forging In-complete Part - Forming NOK

    ACTUAL CONTENTS
    PLACE OF RANK
    MODEL:
    OCCURRENCE
    SAFETY /
    REJ. QTY.:
    50 Nos 5/8" National PERFORMANCE/

    Fit/Function
    OTHERS:

    DETAIL OF PROBLEM (DATA/SKETCH)

    NG / Bad
    parts

    OK

    ROOT CAUSE :

    (SKETCH/DATA/DETAIL)

    After going through tracability record and defect analysis it has been
    found that 1st & 2nd station setting parts was stay in small bin / catch
    pan which resulting in got mixup with ok running parts.
    Occurrence

    Socket across flat under

    PROBLEM
    size

    setting parts i.e.1st & 2nd


    station parts got mix-up
    I

    with Ok parts.

    Because setting parts was


    already available in small
    II

    catch pan.
    WHY-WHY ANALYSIS :

    Because small tray / catch


    pan was not clear before
    pan which resulting in got mixup with ok running parts.

    III

    running the machine for


    mass production.

    Because improper
    IV

    handling of setting parts


    OHTAS FASTENERS PVT. LTD.
    UALITY PROBLEM ANALYSIS AND COUNTERMEASURE SHEET (5-RULE)
    PART NAME : Ball Pin PROBLEM NO.

    Forming NOK PART NO. : 1762

    ACTUAL INVESTIGATION (PRODN. END - MACHINE / METHOD / MATERI

    MACHINE
    -MEN

    Allocation of
    Transfer finger operator & un-skilled
    inspectors sorting
    not working
    operator
    properly
    Neglegence of
    Loose fastning machine
    of die block operator

    Improper handling of
    setting part NG /
    unidentified RM
    Setting part
    material used
    Pictroial Work got mixed up
    instruction not with ok parts Forging
    In-
    available
    complet
    e Part -
    Forming
    NOK

    : METHOD MATERIAL
    COUNTERMEASURE DETAIL RESP.
    CORRECTIVE ACTION :
    1.material sortout and defect pcs scrapped

    2.Setting part handling work instruction made in local language and


    displayed in all relevent areas to follow the proper handling of setting
    P.SHARMA/
    parts to avoid mixing with ok parts. VIKAS KUMAR

    3. Instruction
    given to all machine operators and supervioser small
    bin must be clear before running the machine for mass production.

    PREVENTIVE ACTION :
    1. Setting part handling work instruction made in local language and
    displayed in all relevent areas to follow the proper handling of setting
    parts to avoid mixing with ok parts.
    P.SHARMA/
    2. Quality alert displayed at all relevant areas. VIKAS KUMAR
    1. Setting part handling work instruction made in local language and
    displayed in all relevent areas to follow the proper handling of setting
    parts to avoid mixing with ok parts.
    P.SHARMA/
    2. Quality alert displayed at all relevant areas. VIKAS KUMAR

    3. Training provided to all operators & final inspector about defect


    awarness.

    MONITORING SHEET (REOCCURANCE OF DEFECT ) (QTY./GRAPH)


    V I MONTH II MONTH III MONTH IV MONTH V MONTH
    pictorial work instruction
    Because there is no

    available on machine.
    FMT NO.: F/QA/08-A
    REV.NO.: 01

    E) EFF.DT.: 20/04/18

    APPROVED
    PREPARED BY CHECKED BY DATE:
    BY

    Vikas Kumar P. Sharma Vijay Kumar 4/28/2018

    ACHINE / METHOD / MATERIAL / JIG / EQUIPMENT)


    PROCESS FLOW RESULT ANALYSIS

    OK
    RM Incoming
    OK
    RM Inspection
    Not OK
    Forging
    After going through tracability record and defect
    OK analysis it has been found that 1st & 2nd station
    Thread Rolling
    setting parts was stay in small bin / catch pan
    OK which resulting in got mixup with ok running
    Heat Treatment
    parts.
    OK
    F. Inspection
    OK
    Packing &
    Despatch

    IMPL. DATE OBSERVATION / EFFECTIVENESS (GRAPH/Cp)

    4/30/2018

    Next coming Lot


    Next coming Lot

    FEED BACK TO OTHER (HORIZONTALLY


    DEFECT ) (QTY./GRAPH) DEPLOYMENT)
    VI MONTH REMARKS PROCESS ( IF SAME TYPE

    PROBLEM)
    INSTRUCTIONS
    TO AVOID MATERIAL MIXING
    DURING SETUP CHANGE
    COLD FORGING

    1) maSaIna kI T/aMsafr
    ifMgar maoM ipClaI
    saOiTMga ka kao[ BaI
    paT- nahI haonaa
    caaihyao.

    2) knvaoyar T/o maoM


    ipClaI saOiTMga ka
    kao[ BaI paT- nahI
    haonaa caaihyao.
    3) paT- kUilaMga T/o
    maoM ipClaI saOiTMga
    ka kao[ BaI paT- nahI
    haonaa caaihyao.
    4) Dayala sTOMD pr
    ipClaI saOiTMga ka
    kao[ BaI paT- nahI
    haonaa caaihyao.

    5)maSaIna knvaoyar
    maoM ipClaI saOiTMga
    ka kao[ BaI paT- nahI
    haonaa caaihyao.

    6) @vaailaTI
    [MspO@Sana Tovala pr
    6) @vaailaTI
    [MspO@Sana Tovala pr
    ipClaI saOiTMga ka
    kao[ BaI paT- nahI
    haonaa caaihyao.

    Prepared By Approved By:


    TIONS
    RIAL MIXING
    P CHANGE
    pproved By:
    Objective Evidenc
    Before Afte

    COMMENTS"- COMMENTS"-
    One complete revolution of conveyor could not ensured which is required for One shell of conveyor marked with colour s
    complete disposition of previous setting parts. ensured and complete disposition of previo
    Evidence
    After

    nveyor marked with colour so that complete revolution can be


    mplete disposition of previous setting parts.

    You might also like