OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)

Name of Employee: YOLANDA L. ESPIRITU Name of Rater: HERMOGENES M. PANGANIBAN, Ed.D.

Position: Teacher In-Charge Position: Asst. Schools Division Superintendent
Review Period: June 2016- March 2017 Date of Review: _____________ 2016
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: Division of Batangas

TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED IN DURING EVALUATION

PERFORMANCE
MFOs

KRAs

WEIGHT
INDICATORS ACTUAL RATING SCORE
OBJECTIVES MOVs TIMELINE PER
RESULTS
KRA (QUALITY, EFFICIENCY, TIMELINES)
Q E T AVE.
1 Accounted for improved * Form 137 June 7% 5 - 100 % of students attained
BASIC EDUCATION SERVICES (SUPPORT TO ACADEMICS)

learning outcomes (Q) of *School Form 7 2016- 75% and above in the final
schools viz-a-viz goals and March rating in all learning areas
targets with at least 75% (E) 2017 during the school year
final rating during the school
INSTRUCTIONAL SUPERVISION (25%)

year (T) 4 - 85 to 99% of students

attained 75% and above in
the final rating in all learning
areas during the school year

3 - 70 to 84% of students
attained 75% and above in
the final rating in all learning
areas during the school year

2 - 55 to 69% of students
attained 75% and above in
the final rating in all learning
areas during the school year

1 - 54% and below of

students attained 75% and
above in the final rating in all
learning areas during the
school year
MFOs

KRAs WEIGHT PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RATING SCORE

OBJECTIVES MOVs TIMELINE PER
RESULTS
KRA (QUALITY, EFFICIENCY, TIMELINES)

Q E T AVE.
2 Attended/Conducted 5 *Memorandum June 9% 5 – 5 and above trainings were
trainings (E) in a year (T) to 2016- attended/conducted with
capacitate teachers in *Certificate of March necessary documents in a year
improving the quality of Appearance 2017 to capacitate teachers in
classroom instructions (Q) improving the quality of
*Certificate of classroom instructions
Participation
4 - 4 trainings were
BASIC EDUCATION SERVICES (SUPPORT TO ACADEMICS)

attended/conducted with
necessary documents in a year
to capacitate teachers in
improving the quality of
INSTRUCTIONAL SUPERVISION (25%)

classroom instructions

3 - 3 trainings were
attended/conducted with
necessary documents in a year
to capacitate teachers in
improving the quality of
classroom instructions

2 - 2 trainings were
attended/conducted with
necessary documents in a year
to capacitate teachers in
improving the quality of
classroom instructions

1 - 1 training were
attended/conducted with
necessary documents in a year
to capacitate teachers in
improving the quality of
classroom instruction s
MFOs

KRAs WEIGHT PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RATING SCORE

OBJECTIVES MOVs TIMELINE PER
RESULTS
KRA (QUALITY, EFFICIENCY, TIMELINES)

Q E T AVE.
3 Inspected / checked * Signed DLL/DLP June 9% 5 - 100% DLP/DLL were
100% (E) lesson plans / * Checklist 2016- inspected/checked weekly
March
daily lesson logs on a 2017
BASIC EDUCATION SERVICES (SUPPORT TO ACADEMICS)

weekly basis (T) for better

delivery of instruction (Q) 4 - 100% DLP/DLL were
inspected/checked every two
weeks
INSTRUCTIONAL SUPERVISION (25%)

3 - 100% DLP/DLL were

inspected/checked every
three weeks

2 - 100% DLP/DLL were

inspected/checked every
month

1 - 100% DLP/DLL were

inspected/checked every two
months
MFOs

KRAs WEIGHT PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RATING SCORE

OBJECTIVES MOVs TIMELINE PER
RESULTS
KRA (QUALITY, EFFICIENCY, TIMELINES)

Q E T AVE.
1 Implemented 100% (E) of *Crafted school June 6% 5 - implemented DepEd
the following DepEd initiated child protection 2016- programs with an outstanding
programs within the School policy and other March results within the school year
Year (T) to promote positive related activities 2017
learning environment (Q) *Narrative and 4 - implemented DepEd
BASIC EDUCATION SERVICES (SUPPORT TO ACADEMICS)

pictorial reports programs with a very satisfactory

1.1 Child Protection Policy *Accomplishment results within the school year
1.2 Gender and Reports
Development 3 - implemented DepEd
1.3 Disaster Risk Reduction programs with a satisfactory
LEARNING ENVIRONMENT (20%)

Management results within the school year

1.4 Brigada Eskwela
2 - implemented DepEd
programs with a fair results
within the school year

1 - implemented DepEd program

with a poor results within the
school year
MFOs

KRAs WEIGHT PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RATING SCORE

OBJECTIVES MOVs TIMELINE PER
RESULTS
KRA (QUALITY, EFFICIENCY, TIMELINES)

Q E T AVE.
2 Provided a 100% (E) safe * Inventory of June 7% 5 - got a total of at least 35
and child friendly (Q) school buildings 2016- points and higher which showed
and facilities March an outstanding performance
learning and school 2017 based on criteria within the
BASIC EDUCATION SERVICES (SUPPORT TO ACADEMICS)

environment for students / *Well-equipped school year

learners within the school facilities
year (T) 4 - got a total of at least 30
*Well-painted points but lower than 35 points
LEARNING ENVIRONMENT (20%)

classrooms, roofs, which showed very satisfactory

etc. performance based on criteria
within the school year
*Child Friendly
Evaluation Tool 3 - got a total of at least 25
points but lower than 30 points
which showed satisfactory
performance based on criteria
within the school year

2 - got a total of at least 20

points but lower than 25 points
which needs minimal
improvement based on criteria
within the school year

1 - got a total of 20 points and

below which needs major
improvement based on criteria
within the school year
MFOs

KRAs

WEIGHT PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RATING SCORE

OBJECTIVES MOVs TIMELINE PER
RESULTS
KRA (QUALITY, EFFICIENCY, TIMELINES)

Q E T AVE.
3 Coordinated with *Letters June 7% 5 - coordinated with
organization & groups / * Narrative 2016- organizations or groups /
stakeholders with 100% (E) / Accomplishment March stakeholders with 100% support
support to ensure safety (Q) Report 2017
of school property and other 4 - coordinated with
BASIC EDUCATION SERVICES (SUPPORT TO ACADEMICS)

school learning facilities *Memorandum of organizations or groups /

within the school year (T) Agreement stakeholders with 85-99 %
support
* Memorandum of
LEARNING ENVIRONMENT (20%)

Understanding 3 - coordinated with

organization or groups /
stakeholders with 70-84 %
support

2 - coordinated with
organization or groups /
stakeholders with 51-69 %
support

1 - coordinated with
organization or groups /
stakeholders with 50% and
below support
MFOs

KRAs

WEIGHT PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RATING SCORE

OBJECTIVES MOVs TIMELINE PER
RESULTS
KRA (QUALITY, EFFICIENCY, TIMELINES)

Q E T AVE.
1 100 % students (E) attained *Periodic Test June 15% 5 - 100% of students attained at
BASIC EDUCATION SERVICES (SUPPORT TO ACADEMICS)

at least 75% Mean Results 2016- least 75% Mean Percentage

Percentage Score (MPS) (Q) March Score (MPS)
in all subjects within the *Item Analysis 2017
school year 2016-2017 (T) 4 - 85% - 99% of pupils attained
*E- Class Records at least 75% Mean Percentage
STUDENTS’ OUTCOME (30%)

Score (MPS)

3 -70% - 84% of pupils attained

at least 75% Mean Percentage
Score (MPS)

2 - 55% - 69% of pupils attained

at least 75% Mean Percentage
Score (MPS)

1 - 54% and below of pupils

attained at least 75% Mean
Percentage Score (MPS)
MFOs

KRAs

WEIGHT PERFORMANCE INDICATORS RATING SCORE

ACTUAL
OBJECTIVES MOVs TIMELINE PER
RESULTS
KRA (QUALITY, EFFICIENCY, TIMELINES)

Q E T AVE.
2 Maintained updated June 10% 5 -Teacher systematically
students’ school records (Q) *School Forms 2016- maintained updated students’
and submitted/finished on March school records with the presence
time (T). Realization of the *E- Class Record 2017 of four and above documents
aforementioned objective submitted/finished 4-5 days
BASIC EDUCATION SERVICES (SUPPORT TO ACADEMICS)

could be measured through *Student’s Activity before the due date

the following documents:
*Learner 4 -Teacher systematically
A. School Forms Information System maintained updated students’
B. E- Class Record (LIS) school records with the presence
STUDENTS OUTCOME (30%)

C. Student’s Activity of four documents

D. Learner Information submitted/finished 2-3 days
System (LIS) before the due date

3 - Teacher systematically
maintained updated students’
school records with the presence
of three documents
submitted/finished a day before
the due date

2 -Teacher systematically
maintained updated students’
school records with the presence
of two documents submitted/
finished on the due date

1 - Teacher systematically
maintained updated students’
school records with the presence
of one document
submitted/finished after the due
date
MFOs

KRAs

WEIGHT PERFORMANCE INDICATORS RATING SCORE

ACTUAL
OBJECTIVES MOVs TIMELINE PER
RESULTS
KRA (QUALITY, EFFICIENCY, TIMELINES)

Q E T AVE.
3 Conducted 10 *Remediation June 5% 5 – 10 and above
Modules/Materials 2016- remedial/reinforcement with
BASIC EDUCATION SERVICES (SUPPORT TO ACADEMICS)

remedial/reinforcement/
corrective teaching activities March necessary documents within the
(E) to improve academic 2017 school year
*List of Students
performance (Q) within the
4 – 8 to 9 remedial/
school year (T) reinforcement with necessary
STUDENTS’ OUTCOME (30%)

documents within the school

year
3- 6 to 7 remedial/ reinforcement
with necessary documents within
the school year

2-4 to 5 remedial/ reinforcement

with necessary documents within
the school year

1- 2 to 3 remedial/ reinforcement
with necessary documents within
the school year
MFOs

KRAs WEIGHT PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RATING SCORE

OBJECTIVES MOVs TIMELINE PER
RESULTS
KRA (QUALITY, EFFICIENCY, TIMELINES)

Q E T AVE.
1 Organized and conducted 4 *Minutes of the June 3% 5 - 5 and above meetings
(E) meetings to establish Meeting 2016- were organized and
school, family and March
conducted with
PARENTS INVOLVEMENT AND COMMUNITY PARTENERSHIP (10%)

community partnership for *Attendance 2017

better school accomplishment reports
performance(Q) within the within the school year
BASIC EDUCATION SERVICES (SUPPORT TO ACADEMICS)

school year (T)

4 - 4 meetings were
organized and conducted with
accomplishment reports
within the school year

3 - 3 meetings were
organized and conducted with
accomplishment report within
the school year

2 - 2 meetings were
organized and conducted with
accomplishment reports
within the school year

1 - a training was organized

and conducted with
accomplishment reports
within the year
MFOs

KRAs WEIGHT PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RATING SCORE

OBJECTIVES MOVs TIMELINE PER
RESULTS
KRA (QUALITY, EFFICIENCY, TIMELINES)

Q E T AVE.
2 Involved 100 % (E) of *Attendance June 3% 5 - 100 % parents/community
parents/ community in the 2016- participated in the
implementation of DepEd *Minutes of the March
implementation of DepEd
Meeting 2017
PARENTS INVOLVEMENT AND COMMUNITY PARTENERSHIP (10%)

programs and projects (Q) programs/projects with

within the school year (T) *Pictorial evidences during the school
year
BASIC EDUCATION SERVICES (SUPPORT TO ACADEMICS)

4 - 85 to 99%
parents/community participated
in the implementation of DepEd
programs/projects with
evidences during the school
year
3 - 70 to 84% of
parents/community participated
in the implementation of DepEd
programs/projects with
evidences during the school
year
2 - 55 to 69%
parents/community participated
in the implementation of DepEd
programs/projects with
evidences during the school
year
1 - 54% parents/community
participated in the
implementation of DepEd
programs/projects with
evidences during the school
year
MFOs

KRAs

WEIGHT PERFORMANCE INDICATORS RATING SCORE

ACTUAL
OBJECTIVES MOVs TIMELINE PER
RESULTS
KRA (QUALITY, EFFICIENCY, TIMELINES)
PARENTS INVOLVEMENT AND COMMUNITY PARTENERSHIP (10%)

Q E T AVE.
3 3. Participated actively in at *Pictorial Reports June 4% 5- Participated actively in 5 or
least 5 indicated (E) 2016- more indicated community
BASIC EDUCATION SERVICES (SUPPORT TO ACADEMICS)

community projects below *Narrative Reports March projects with proper

throughout the school year 2017 documentation throughout the
(T) *Certificate of school year
a. Coastal Clean-up Participation
b. Clean-up Drive 4- Participated actively in 4
c. Information Drive *Certificate of indicated community projects
d. Tree Planting Appearance with proper documentation
e. Founding Anniversary throughout the school year
f. Festivals *Attendance
g. Alay Lakad 3- Participated actively in 3
h. Others indicated community projects
with proper documentation
throughout the school year

2- Participated actively in 2
indicated community projects
with proper documentation
throughout the school year

1- Participated only one

community project throughout
the school year
MFOs

KRAs

WEIGHT PERFORMANCE INDICATORS RATING SCORE

ACTUAL
OBJECTIVES MOVs TIMELINE PER
RESULTS
KRA (QUALITY, EFFICIENCY, TIMELINES)
SCHOOL LEADERSHIP, MANAGEMENT AND SCHOOL OPERATIONS (10%)

Q E T AVE.
1 Liquidated 100 % of *Liquidation June 3% 5 - MOOE and other financial
MOOE and other funds Report 2016- resources were 100%
March utilized , liquidated, updated
(E) to support learning 2017 and reported quarterly.
BASIC EDUCATION SERVICES (SUPPORT TO ACADEMICS)

outcomes and other *Narrative Report

school operations (Q) *Financial Report
every quarter (T) 4 - MOOE and other financial
resources were 100%
utilized , liquidated, updated
quarterly.

3 - MOOE and other financial

resources were 100% utilized
and liquidated quarterly.

2 - MOOE and other financial

resources were 100% utilized
but not liquidated on time

1 - MOOE and other financial

resources were 100% utilized
without liquidation during the
quarter.
MFOs

KRAs

WEIGHT PERFORMANCE INDICATORS RATING SCORE

ACTUAL
OBJECTIVES MOVs TIMELINE PER
RESULTS
KRA (QUALITY, EFFICIENCY, TIMELINES)

Q E T AVE.
 2 Allocated / Prioritized *APP June 3% 5-Allocated 100% of the funds
100% (E) of the funds for 2016- for programs, facilities,
SCHOOL LEADERSHIP, MANAGEMENT AND SCHOOL OPERATIONS (10%) programs, facilities, *Canteen March improvement and
improvement and Allocations 2017 maintenance of the school
maintenance of the school and submitted before the
and submitted on the target date
BASIC EDUCATION SERVICES (SUPPORT TO ACADEMICS)

target date (T) with the

presence of the following: 4- Allocated 100% of the
funds for programs, facilities,
a. Property Custodian / improvement and
Physical Facilities maintenance of the school
Coordinator and submitted on the target
date
b. Canteen Manager
3-Allocated 100% of the funds
c. School Treasurer for programs, facilities,
improvement and
d. BAC Committee maintenance of the school
Members and submitted 1-2 days after
the target date

2-Allocated 100% of the funds

for programs, facilities,
improvement and
maintenance of the school
and submitted 3-5 days after
the target date

1-Allocated 100% of the funds

for programs, facilities,
improvement and maintenance
of the school and submitted 6-7
days after the target date
MFOs

KRAs

WEIGHT PERFORMANCE INDICATORS RATING SCORE

ACTUAL
OBJECTIVES MOVs TIMELINE PER
RESULTS
KRA (QUALITY, EFFICIENCY, TIMELINES)

Q E T AVE.
 3 Managed 100% (E) of the of *Report on the June 4% 5-Managed 100% of the School

SCHOOL LEADERSHIP, MANAGEMENT AND SCHOOL OPERATIONS (10%)

the School Finance management of 2016- Finances allocation judiciously in
allocation judiciously (Q )in school funds March accordance with DepED policies and
accordance with DepED 2017 accounting rules and regulations and
other pertinent guidelines with 5
policies and accounting rules a. MOOE complete and accurate data
and regulations and other Liquidation Report
BASIC EDUCATION SERVICES (SUPPORT TO ACADEMICS)

throughout the year

pertinent guidelines
throughout the year(T) with b. Canteen Report 4- Managed 100% of the School
the following support data: Finances allocation judiciously in
accordance with DepED policies and
a. Prepared Annual accounting rules and regulations and
Procurement Plan other pertinent guidelines with 4
complete and accurate data
throughout the year
b. APP expenditures were
aligned in the AIP 3-Managed 100% of the School
Finances allocation judiciously in
c. Cash Advance was accordance with DepED policies and
prepared and properly accounting rules and regulations and
submitted to higher other pertinent guidelines with 3
authorities complete and accurate data
throughout the year
d. Proposed expenditures
2-Managed 100% of the School
were based from APP Finances allocation judiciously in
accordance with DepED policies and
e. Liquidated MOOE wthin accounting rules and regulations and
the prescribed period (30) other pertinent guidelines with 2
days after the issuance of complete and accurate data
check throughout the year

1-Managed 100% of the School

Finances allocation judiciously in
accordance with DepED policies and
accounting rules and regulations and
other pertinent guidelines with one
complete and accurate data
throughout the year
MFOs

KRAs

WEIGHT PERFORMANCE INDICATORS RATING SCORE

ACTUAL
OBJECTIVES MOVs TIMELINE PER
RESULTS
KRA (QUALITY, EFFICIENCY, TIMELINES)
Q E T AVE.
 Conducted one (1) Action *Copy of Proposal June 5% 5- a copy of the research was
research with results and Copy of the 2016- submitted a week before the due
submitted on the due date finished research March date with no errors on structure,
Intervention / action 2017 content and organization and the
results were communicated, the
plan plans were implemented and with
very well-prepared narrative and
pictorial report of accomplishments
4- a copy of the research was
submitted 3 days before the due
date with 1-5 errors on structure,
content and organization and the
results were communicated, the
PROFESSIONAL GROWTH (5%)

plans were implemented and with

well-prepared narrative and pictorial
report of accomplishments are well-
prepared
3-a copy of the research was
submitted on the due date with 6-16
errors on structure, content and
organization and the results were
communicated, the plans were
implemented and well-prepared
narrative and pictorial report
accomplishments
2-a copy of the research was
submitted 1-5 days before the due
date with 16 or more errors on
structure, content and organization
and the results were communicated,
the plans were implemented and
well-prepared narrative and pictorial
report of accomplishments well-
prepared
1-a copy of the research was
submitted 1-5 days before the due
date with 16 or more errors on
structure, content and organization
and the results were communicated,
the plans were implemented and well-
prepared narrative and pictorial report
of accomplishments well-prepared

Total Rating / Average 100% TOTAL RATING

*To get the score, the rating is multiplied by the weight assigned ADJECTIVAL RATING
Major Final Output Key Result Areas Rating

Write here all KRAs

Numerical Rating
Adjectival rating

Rater: Approved:
Ratee:

YOLANDA L. ESPIRITU HERMOGENES M. PANGANIBAN, Ed.D. CARLITO D. ROCAFORT, CESO V

Teacher In-Charge OIC-Asst. Schools Division Superintendent Schools Division Superintendent

Performance Management Team

________________________________________
________________________________________
________________________________________
________________________________________
________________________________________
________________________________________
________________________________________
________________________________________
________________________________________
________________________________________
________________________________________
Chairman

Category Description Range Adjectival Rating Scale Definition

The extent to which actual performance compare with targeted
Effectiveness/Quality 4.500 - 5.000 Outstanding 5 Role Model
performance
The extent to which time or resources is used for the intended task or
purpose. Measures whether targets are accomplished with a minimum
Efficiency 3.500 - 4.499 Very Satisfactory 4 Consistency Demonstrate
amount or quantity of waste, expense, or unnecessary effort.
In management, efficiency relates to doing the things right
Measures whether the deliverable was done on time based on the Most of the time
2.500 - 3.499 Satisfactory 3
requirements of the rules and regulations, and/or clients/stakeholders. demonstrate
Timeless Time-related performance indicators evaluate such things as project 1.500 – 2.499 Unsatisfactory 2 Sometimes demonstrate
completion deadlines, time management skills and other time-sensitive
1.499 & below Poor 1 Rarely demonstrate
expectations.