Kumar 2016
Kumar 2016
Kumar 2016
Contents
1 Introduction 2
2 Plant Growth-Promoting Microorganisms (PGPM) 3
2.1 Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR) 3
2.1.1 Nitrogen Fixation 4
2.1.2 Phytohormones Production 5
2.1.3 Siderophore Production 6
2.1.4 Phosphate Solubilization 7
2.2 Plant Growth-Promoting Fungi (PGPF) 8
2.2.1 Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi (AMF) 8
2.2.2 Trichoderma 10
3 Bioremediation 11
4 Interaction of PGPM with Plants and Soil 12
5 Conclusions and Future Prospects 13
References 13
microorganisms release the bound minerals from the organic materials in the soil,
which are absorbed by plant roots. This chapter reviews bacteria, fungi and their
associations and interactions with plants and soil for beneficial effects on crop
plants such as mineral nutrition, disease suppression, bioremediation, etc.
1 Introduction
Microorganisms in the rhizosphere soil play a key role in maintaining the soil
fertility (Yadav et al. 2015), which is key for successful crop production to meet
the increasing global food demand. Soil is a mixture of minerals, organic matter,
gases, liquids, and many other organisms that are supporting the plant life. Soil
acts as a reservoir of air, water, and nutrients that is essential for plant growth.
Only a few grams of soil contain hundred millions to billion microorganisms.
Bacteria are the most abundant microbes in soil followed by fungi; however, the
actinomycetes are ranges in between bacteria and fungi. The fungi and actinomy-
cetes degrade various plants and animal residues that reach soil, such as complex
carbohydrates, simple sugars, starch, cellulose, hemicelluloses, pectins, lignins,
proteins, fats, oils, waxes, resins, and other products. Bacteria finish the degrada-
tion by eating the digestible materials. Other microbes that are found in smaller
numbers are algae, cyanobacteria, protozoa, and nematodes. Soil gives the neces-
sary support for anchorage to plant roots (Yadav et al. 2012; Bhaduri et al. 2015).
The metabolism of microorganisms and root growth in the soil add to texture and
fertility. The association of microorganisms with plants leads to different associa-
tions such as mutualism (both plants and microorganisms are benefited), com-
mensalism (one partner is benefited and others remain unaffected), and parasitism
(one partner benefited and the other harmed).
The microorganisms present in the rhizosphere that colonize plant roots are
termed as plant growth-promoting microorganisms. The roots provide anchorage
to plant, increase the uptake of water and mineral nutrients, and secrete a variety
of compounds as root exudates. The secretion of the chemical compounds alters
the physical and chemical properties of soil, and also regulates the microbial com-
munity in the vicinity of the rhizosphere (Yadav et al. 2012). This may help in
attracting active microorganisms to metabolize the secreted compounds in the
rhizosphere. Some of the root exudates attract microorganisms, while others act
as repellents against a wide range of microorganisms. This chapter highlights the
plant growth-promoting microorganism types, their associations and interactions
with plants and soil.
Plant Growth-Promoting Microorganisms: Interaction with Plants and Soil 3
The term PGPR was first coined by Kloepper and Schroth (1978) to describe the
beneficial rhizospheric bacterial populations that may colonize plant roots and
exhibit growth promotion attributes. In general, the PGPR are free-living bacteria,
colonize roots, and promote plant growth directly by nitrogen fixation, phosphate
solubilization, production of phytohormones and siderophores or indirectly by their
biocontrol properties such as antibiotic production, production of lytic enzymes,
competition with phytopathogens for nutrients and colonizing sites, and induced
systemic resistance (Akhtar et al. 2011).
The application of a mixture of PGPRs (Azospirillum lipoferum, Azotobacter
chroococcum, Pseudomonas fluorescens, and Bacillus megaterium) has increased
germination rate, shoot and root length and dry weight, chlorophyll and nutrient
(NPK) content compared to control or individual application in Catharanthus
roseus (Lenin and Jayanthi 2012). Similarly, improvement in growth parameters
(fresh and dry weight, stem diameter, seedling height, chlorophyll content, and leaf
area) was reported in cabbage seedlings by the application of PGPR strains (B.
megaterium, B. subtilis and Pantoea agglomerans) compared to control (Turan et al.
2014). Sen and Chandrasekhar (2014) reported the significant increase in plant
height, and dry weight by the inoculation of P. fluorescens in rice seedlings under
salt stress conditions. Furthermore, the application of different PGPR (Bacillus,
4 V.V. Kumar
Indole acetic acid (IAA) is the most common natural auxin having a positive effect
on root growth. Most of the rhizobacteria colonizing the seed coat or root surface is
proposed to act in conjunction with endogenous IAA in stimulating cell prolifera-
tion and uptake of minerals and nutrients from the soil (Akhtar and Siddiqui 2009).
IAA affects plant cell division, extension, and differentiation; stimulates seed and
tuber germination; increases the rate of xylem and root development; controls
processes of vegetative growth; initiates lateral and adventitious root formation;
mediates responses to light, gravity, and florescence; affects photosynthesis, pigment
formation, biosynthesis of various metabolites, and resistance to stressful
6 V.V. Kumar
Iron is one of the most important essential nutrients for growth of microorganisms
in diverse environments. It is required for various cellular, metabolic, and biosyn-
thetic processes, including DNA synthesis, electron transport system, formation of
heme, cofactor for enzymes, oxygen transport, synthesis of ATP, and nitrite reduc-
tion in the nitrogen cycle. Although it is abundant in nature, it is not easily available
in the preferred state. In the presence of oxygen and neutral pH it undergoes rapid
oxidation from Fe2+ to Fe3+ and finally forms insoluble ferric-oxyhydroxide, which
is almost unavailable for acquisition by microbes. The siderophores are relatively
low molecular weight (400–1500 Da) iron-chelating compounds produced by many
bacteria and fungi under iron-starved conditions. Generally, siderophores can be
classified into three categories depending upon the moiety that donates oxygen
ligands for Fe3+ coordination: (a) catecholates (or phenolates) (b) hydroxymates (or
carboxylate), and (c) mixed types. Siderophores mainly scavenge iron and also form
complexes with other elements (i.e., Mo, Mn, Co, and Ni) from the surrounding
environment and make them available to host microbial cells. They promote plant
growth by creating an antagonistic impact on phytopathogens. In soya bean, seed
germination, shoot and root length were increased by the application of siderophore-
producing Bacillus spp. GN-01 isolated from groundnut soil (Afreen and Chavan
2014). Siderophore production was observed in iron-limited King’s B medium by P.
fluorescens isolated from the rhizosphere soil of faba bean (Alemu 2013).
Plant Growth-Promoting Microorganisms: Interaction with Plants and Soil 7
Siderophore-producing Bacillus spp., isolated from rice, chili, ragi, and beans con-
trolled Fusarium oxysporum. Maximum siderophore secretion was recorded on sec-
ond and third day, and thereafter a decline was observed.
Siderophores directly stimulate the synthesis of antimicrobial compounds by
increasing the availability of minerals and suppressing the growth of pathogenic
organisms (Sobha and Kumudini 2012). Siderophores produced by Arthrobacter
luteolus isolated from the rare earth environment from Kerala, India reported the
accumulation of rare earth metals Samarium and Scandium (Emmanuel et al. 2012).
The nodule-forming bacteria isolated from the root nodules of leguminous plants
such as Rhizobium spp., Bradyrhizobium spp. and Sinorhizobium spp. also produced
siderophores (Deshwal et al. 2013). Verma et al. (2012) reported that R. meliloti has
the ability to produce siderophores.
Phosphorus (P) is the most important element in the nutrition of plants, next to nitro-
gen (N). It plays a key role in all major metabolic process, including photosynthesis,
energy transfer, signal transduction, macromolecular biosynthesis, respiration, and
nitrogen fixation. Phosphorus is abundant in soils in both inorganic and organic
forms. Inorganic phosphorus occurs in soil mostly in insoluble complexes, some of
them appearing after frequent application of chemical fertilizers. Organic matter is
also an important reservoir of immobilized P in soils. It has been suggested that the
accumulated P in agricultural soils would be sufficient to sustain maximum crop
yields worldwide for more than 100 years. Several bacterial and fungal species have
been described for their phosphate-solubilizing abilities. Bacillus and Pseudomonas
are the predominant bacteria, while Aspergillus and Penicillium are the predominant
fungi. The other important P-solubilizing bacteria include Rhodococcus, Arthrobacter,
Serratia, Chryseobacterium, Gordonia, Phyllobacterium, Azotobacter, Xanthomonas,
Enterobacter, Pantoea, Klebsiella, Vibrio, and Xanthobacter. Nodule-forming
Rhizobium has also shown P-solubilizing activity. Moreover, some species of
Trichoderma and Rhizoctonia also have P-solubilizing potential. Apart from bacteria
and fungi, actinomycete genera Streptomyces and Micromonospora, algae such as
cyanobacteria, and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and Entrophospora colombiana
have shown P-solubilizing ability. Azotobacter spp. isolated from slightly alkaline
soils have shown a good P-solubilizing ability along with nitrogen fixation under
in vitro conditions (Nosrati et al. 2014). Garg and Sharma (2013) reported that 16
rhizobial isolates from root nodules Trigonella and Tephrosia were found positive for
P solubilization and 14 isolates were found positive for IAA production. Klebsiella
oxytoca isolated from heavy metal contaminated soil has shown P solubilizing
activity in the presence of various C & N sources. Highest P solubilization was
recorded with glucose (460 μg/ml) followed by fructose (444 μg/ml) and galactose
(435 μg/ml) in the medium. Very poor P solubilization was recorded when lactose
(141 μg/ml) was used as C source. Among different N sources (NH4)2SO4 (460 μg/
ml)was best for growth and P solubilization of K. oxytoca, where as yeast resulted in
8 V.V. Kumar
poor growth and P solubilization (215 μg/ml) (Walpola et al. 2014). Co-inoculation
of tomato plants with P. agglomerans and Burkholderia anthina has shown P solubi-
lization under lab conditions and increase in plant growth parameters under field
conditions (Walpola and Yoon 2013).
The arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) and Trichoderma spp. are well recognized
as plant growth-promoting fungi. AMF promote growth of crop plants by supplying
various nutrients (mainly phosphorus). Through its hyphae nutrients are released
into plant roots through arbuscules. The vesicles formed in the cortical region store
the excess phosphorus in the form of polyphosphate, and this polyphosphate is
again converted into phosphate through enzymatic action and utilized by the plant
under phosphate-deficient condition, whereas Trichoderma promotes growth of
crop plants by controlling the disease-causing fungi and also through biofertiliza-
tion potential. Trichoderma decomposes the organic materials through the secretion
of enzymes, cellulases, hemicellulases, etc., thus releasing the nutrients that are
readily available to plants.
Fig. 1 Diagrammatic
representation of
mycorrhizal associations in
plants
Plant roots
Fig. 2 Microscopic view of root showing intraradical mycorrhizal spores and hyphae
2.2.2 Trichoderma
Trichoderma is a filamentous fungus isolated from soil, dead wood, and organic
materials. Currently, different species of Trichoderma such as T. harzianum, T.
viride, and T. virens have proven their worth to be used as biocontrol agent against
a wide range of pathogenic fungi (Rhizoctonia spp., Pythium spp., Botrytis cinerea,
and Fusarium spp. Phytophthora palmivora). Trichoderma also has a unique ability
to produce siderophores. The production of siderophores chelate the available iron
from the environment and this iron starvation causes the death of phytopathogens.
Srivastava et al. (2013) reported that all the three tested Trichoderma strains
(MPPLUNS1, MPPLUNS2, and MPPLUNS3) had the ability to produce sidero-
phores, but MPPLUNS1 was found best among all the tested strains. Likewise,
antibiosis is another mechanism of disease protection, where the metabolites are
secreted by underground parts of plants, soil microorganisms, plant residues, etc.
Plant Growth-Promoting Microorganisms: Interaction with Plants and Soil 11
and resulted in the production of lytic enzymes, volatile and toxic compounds.
A wide range of antibiotics such as tropolone, gliotoxin, gliovirin, viridin, viridol,
trichodermin, trichozianin, pyrones, and terpenes is produced by Trichoderma sp.
These antibiotics may play a significant role in the biocontrol of plant pathogens.
Qualhato et al. (2013) concluded that the Trichoderma species grown in liquid
cultures challenged with fungal pathogens secreted various cell wall-degrading
enzymes, viz., β-1,3-glucanase, N-acetyl-b-d-glucosaminidase, chitinase, acid
phosphatase, acid proteases, and alginate lyase.
Mycoparasitism involves sequential events such as recognition of host, attack
and subsequent penetration, and subsequent killing of pathogens. The cell wall sur-
face of the host and non-hosts contains d-galactose and N-acetyl d-glucosamine
residues as lectin binding sites. With the help of lectins present on cell wall,
Trichoderma recognizes the suitable sites (residues of lectins) and binds the hyphae.
After attachment with pathogens, it makes a coil around the pathogens and secretes
the cell wall-degrading enzymes to digest the cell wall and enters into the lumen of
the host. Akrami et al. (2012) reported that use of T. harzianum and T. asperellum
alone or in combination reduced Fusarium rot on Phaseolus vulgaris by the action
of mycoparasitism. Similarly, Gajera et al. (2012) found that different species of
Trichoderma controlled the growth of Macrophomina phaseolina by the action of
cell wall-degrading enzymes (chitinase, β-1,3-glucanase, protease, and cellulase)
under in vitro conditions. Muriungi et al. (2013) reported that the inoculation of
T. viride and T. koningii effectively controlled the growth of F. oxysporum under
in vitro conditions. Leelavathi et al. (2014) concluded that the extract of T. harzia-
num at a concentration of 100–150 μl/ml controlled growth of Aspergillus,
Cladosporium, Rhizopus, and Fusarium. Moreover, root colonization of Trichoderma
sp. directly influenced plant growth and productivity, production of growth regula-
tors like zeatin and gibberellin. It may also increase the uptake of nutrients and
resistance against abiotic stresses.
3 Bioremediation
at the site or ex situ when the pollutant is taken elsewhere and treated. Some examples
of bioremediation are bioventing, bioleaching, landfarming, bioreactor, compost-
ing, bioaugmentation, and rhizofiltration. Bioremediation is becoming a very useful
tool in many industries to prevent environmental pollution. The microorganisms
applied to the contaminated sites secrete enzymes that degrade various chemical
pollutants. Many microorganisms have been isolated from the polluted site, indicat-
ing that they have the ability to tolerate pollutants (Akhtar et al. 2013).
Bioremediation has been demonstrated and is being used as an effective means
of mitigating hydrocarbons, halogenated organic solvents and compounds, non-
chlorinated pesticides and herbicides, nitrogen compounds, metals, and radionu-
clides. P. aeruginosa, isolated from the crude oil contaminated sites in the Mangala
oil field, Barmer district, Rajasthan, could be used for the bioremediation of oil
spills because it has the potential to utilize crude oil as a sole carbon source (Prakash
and Irfan 2011).
In an interesting experiment Ajao et al. (2011) found that the inoculation of
immobilized culture of P. aeruginosa and B. subtilis into a bioreactor fitted with air
sparger containing textile effluent reduced COD from 1200 to 200 mg/l, BOD from
750 to 23 mg/l in 15 days. The other parameters in textile effluent such as total sol-
ids, suspended solids, dissolved solids, heavy metals, nitrate, sulfate, phosphate also
have been reduced significantly and copper disappeared within this period from the
textile effluent. Similarly, use of Trichoderma species culture based on diffusible
and volatile metabolites under in vitro conditions reduced the growth of Pythium in
tomato Patil et al. 2012). The volatile metabolites exhibited broad-spectrum inhibi-
tion of Pythium compared to diffusible metabolites.
Plant roots under nutrient-deficient condition releases certain nutrients like carbo-
hydrates, amino acids, and vitamins into the soil to attract microorganisms. The
microorganisms utilize the root exudates for their growth and multiplication. The
microbes produce hormones like auxins (IAA, IBA), cytokinins, GA3, abscisic acid
(ABA). The plant roots sense these auxins and start emitting lateral roots and root
hairs which absorb water, minerals from the rhizosphere. The uptake of minerals is
increased due to the increased surface area of the roots. Some microorganisms may
colonize in the rhizosphere soil (e.g., Azotobacter, and phosphate-solubilizing bac-
teria (PSB), some (e.g., Rhizobium, Azospirillum, and AM fungi) colonize either on
the surface or inside the roots.
The interaction of microorganisms with plants and soil helps in the improvement
of nutrient (NPK) uptake by various mechanisms. The combined application of
Azospirillum and Azotobacter in maize has resulted in the increase in plant growth,
yield, and hormone (IAA, GA3, cytokinin) production (Naseri et al. 2013). Mehran
et al. (2011) reported that increase in yield was not significant between treated (bac-
teria inoculated) and control plots, whereas a significant increase in yield was
Plant Growth-Promoting Microorganisms: Interaction with Plants and Soil 13
observed in manure applied treatment. Rafi et al. (2012) found that the co-inoculation
of Azospirillum and PSB together resulted in increased shoot and root dry weight,
panicle weight, and 1000 seed weight compared to control or individual inoculation
in foxtail millet. It has been also reported that inoculation of Azotobacter and
Rhizobium together resulted in increase water and nutrient uptake in faba bean
(Dashadi et al. 2011). However, inoculation of Rhizobium with PGPR alone or in
combination significantly increased the nodule number, nodule fresh and dry
weights, grain yield compared to control under salt stress conditions in mung bean
and also improved K/Na ratio in grains by decreasing the Na content compared to
control (Aamir et al. 2013). Similarly, inoculation of Azotobacter and Azospirillum
in maize significantly increased grains weight and yield when bacteria was rapped
with seeds before sowing compared to control (Amiri and Rafiee 2013).
The interaction of PGPM with plants and soil is very important in improving crop
productivity. Soil is fortified with various root exudates of plants attracting microor-
ganisms, which in turn help plants through nitrogen fixation, phosphate solubiliza-
tion, and nutrient mobilization. Different bacteria and fungi are used as biofertilizers
due to their ability in producing phytohormones, siderophores, antimicrobial com-
pounds, developing induced systemic resistance and bioremediation. Microorganisms
could be applied alone or in combination in various crops, but it is advisable to
apply nitrogen-fixing bacteria along with phosphate-solubilizing bacteria because
P requirement during nitrogen fixation is met by phosphate-solubilizing bacteria.
The selection of microorganisms is crucial for a field application for maintaining the
quality of crops. By adopting the biofertilizer strategies in sustainable agriculture
practices the adverse effects of chemical fertilizers and pesticides could be easily
nullified. Moreover, the isolation of microorganisms from the contaminated sites
and their potential application in bioremediation is quite a permissible approach.
The future research will be more focussed on the revolutionization of a consortium
of microorganisms for agricultural inputs and bioremediation of contaminated sites
by the efficient application of microorganisms and their interaction with the plant
and soil in various ecological niches.
Acknowledgement The author is thankful to the Management of Core Green Sugar and Fuels for
giving an opportunity and encouragement in preparation of this chapter.
References
Aamir M, Aslam A, Khan MY, Jamshaid MU, Ahmad M, Asghar HN, Zahir ZA (2013) Co-inoculation
with Rhizobium and plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) for inducing salinity tolerance
in mung bean under field condition of semiarid climate. Asian J Agric Biol 1:17–22
14 V.V. Kumar
Abohatem M, Chakrafi F, Jaiti F, Dihazi A, Baaziz M (2011) Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi limit
incidence of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. albedinis on date palm seedlings by increasing nutrient
contents, total phenols and peroxidase activities. Open Hort J 4:10–16
Afreen JM, Chavan MD (2014) Siderophore produced by Bacillus spp. GN-01 isolated from rhi-
zosphere of ground nut field. Int J Pharm Phytopharmacol Res 3:311–313
Ajao AT, Adebayo GB, Yakubu SE (2011) Bioremediation of textile industrial effluent using
mixed culture of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Bacillus subtilis immobilized on agar-agar in a
bioreactor. J Microbiol Biotechnol Res 1:50–56
Akhtar MS, Panwar J (2011) Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and opportunistic fungi: efficient
root symbionts for the management of plant parasitic nematodes. Adv Sci Eng Med
3:165–175
Akhtar MS, Siddiqui ZA (2008) Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi as potential biprotectants against
plant pathogens. In: Siddiqui ZA, Akhtar MS, Futai K (eds) Mycorrhizae: sustainable agricul-
ture and forestry. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 61–98
Akhtar MS, Siddiqui ZA (2009) Use of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria for the biocontrol of
root-rot disease complex of chickpea. Aust Plant Pathol 38:44–50
Akhtar MS, Siddiqui ZA (2010) Role of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria in biocontrol of
plant diseases and sustainable agriculture. In: Maheshwari DK (ed) Plant growth and health
promoting bacteria. Microbiology monographs 18. Springer, Berlin, pp 157–196
Akhtar MS, Shakeel U, Siddiqui ZA (2010) Biocontrol of Fusarium wilt by Bacillus pumilus,
Pseudomonas alcaligenes and Rhizobium sp. on lentil. Turk J Biol 34:1–7
Akhtar MS, Siddiqui ZA, Wiemken A (2011) Arbuscular Mycorrhizal fungi and Rhizobium to
control plant fungal diseases. In: Lichtfouse E (ed) Alternative farming systems, biotechnol-
ogy, drought stress and ecological fertilisation. Sustainable agriculture reviews 6. Springer,
Dordrecht, pp 263–292
Akhtar MS, Chali B, Azam T (2013) Bioremediation of arsenic and lead by plants and microbes
from contaminated soil. Res Plant Sci 1:68–73
Akram W, Anjum T, Ali B, Ahmad A (2013) Screening of native bacillus strains to induce sys-
temic resistance in tomato plants against Fusarium wilt in split root system and its field appli-
cations. Int J Agric Biol 15:1289–1294
Akrami M, Sabzi M, Mehmandar FB, Khodadadi E (2012) Effect of seed treatment with
Trichoderma harzianum and Trichoderma asperellum species for controlling Fusarium rot of
common bean. Ann Biol Res 3:2187–2189
Alemu F (2013) Isolation of Pseudomonas fluorescens species from rhizospheric soil of faba bean
and assessment of their siderophores production. Int J Adv Res 1:203–210
Almaghrabi OA, Abdelmoneim TS, Albishri HM, Moussa TAA (2014) Enhancement of maize
growth using some plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) under laboratory conditions.
Life Sci J 11:764–772
Amiri A, Rafiee M (2013) Effect of soil inoculation with Azospirillum and Azotobacter bacteria on
nitrogen use efficiency and agronomic characteristics of corn. Ann Biol Res 4:77–79
Bhaduri D, Pal S, Purakayastha TJ, Chakraborty K, Yadav RS, Akhtar MS (2015) Soil quality and
plant-microbe interactions in rhizosphere. In: Lichtfouse E (ed) Sustainable agriculture reviews
17. Springer International Publishing, Cham, doi:10.1007/978-3-319-16742-8_9
Dashadi M, Khosravi H, Moezzi A, Nadian H, Heidari M, Radjabi R (2011) Co-inoculation of
Rhizobium and Azotobacter on growth indices of faba bean under water stress in the green-
house condition. Adv Stud Biol 3:373–385
Deshwal VK, Kumar P (2013) Production of plant growth promoting substance by Pseudomonads.
J Acad Indust Res 2:221–225
Deshwal VK, Singh SB, Kumar P, Chubey A (2013) Rhizobia unique plant growth promoting
rhizobacteria: a review. Int J Life Sci 2:74–86
Elekhtyar NM (2015) Efficiency of Pseudomonas fluorescence as plant growth-promoting rhizo-
bacteria (PGPR) for the enhancement of seedling vigor, nitrogen uptake. Int J Sci Res Agric Sci
2:57–67
Plant Growth-Promoting Microorganisms: Interaction with Plants and Soil 15