FOUNDATION ANALYSIS & DESIGN (ACI318)

In accordance with ACI318-05 incorporating Errata as of April 10, 2012

FOOTING ANALYSIS
Length of foundation; Lx = 5 ft
Width of foundation; Ly = 5 ft
Foundation area; A = Lx  Ly = 25 ft2
Depth of foundation; h = 12 in
Depth of soil over foundation; hsoil = 24 in
Density of concrete; conc = 150.0 lb/ft3

Column no.1 details

Length of column; lx1 = 10.00 in
Width of column; ly1 = 10.00 in
position in x-axis; x1 = 30.00 in
position in y-axis; y1 = 30.00 in

Soil properties

Gross allowable bearing pressure; qallow_Gross = 2.688 ksf

Density of soil; soil = 120.0 lb/ft3

Angle of internal friction; b = 30.0 deg

Design base friction angle; bb = 30.0 deg

Coefficient of base friction; tan(bb) = 0.577

 Design wall friction angle; b = 15.0 deg
Passive pressure coefficient (Coulomb); KP = sin(90 - b)2 / (sin(90 + b)  [1 - [sin(b + b)  sin(b) /
(sin(90 + b))]]2) = 4.977
Foundation loads
Dead surcharge load; FDsur = 25 psf
Live surcharge load; FLsur = 100 psf
Self weight; Fswt = h  conc = 150 psf
Soil weight; Fsoil = hsoil  soil = 240 psf
Column no.1 loads
Dead load in z; FDz1 = 25.0 kips
Live load in z; FLz1 = 28.0 kips
Footing analysis for soil and stability
Load combinations per ASCE 7-05
1.0D (0.526)
1.0D + 1.0L (0.980)
Combination 2 results: 1.0D + 1.0L
Forces on foundation
Force in z-axis; Fdz = D  A  (Fswt + Fsoil + FDsur) + L  A  FLsur + D  FDz1
+ L  FLz1 = 65.9 kips
Moments on foundation
Moment in x-axis, about x is 0; Mdx = D  (A  (Fswt + Fsoil + FDsur)  Lx / 2) + L  A  FLsur 
Lx / 2 + D  (FDz1  x1) + L  (FLz1  x1) = 164.7 kip_ft
Moment in y-axis, about y is 0; Mdy = D  (A  (Fswt + Fsoil + FDsur)  Ly / 2) + L  A  FLsur 
Ly / 2 + D  (FDz1  y1) + L  (FLz1  y1) = 164.7 kip_ft
Uplift verification
Vertical force; Fdz = 65.875 kips
PASS - Foundation is not subject to uplift
Bearing resistance
Eccentricity of base reaction
Eccentricity of base reaction in x-axis; edx = Mdx / Fdz - Lx / 2 = 0 in
Eccentricity of base reaction in y-axis; edy = Mdy / Fdz - Ly / 2 = 0 in
Pad base pressures
q1 = Fdz  (1 - 6  edx / Lx - 6  edy / Ly) / (Lx  Ly) = 2.635 ksf
q2 = Fdz  (1 - 6  edx / Lx + 6  edy / Ly) / (Lx  Ly) = 2.635 ksf
q3 = Fdz  (1 + 6  edx / Lx - 6  edy / Ly) / (Lx  Ly) = 2.635 ksf
q4 = Fdz  (1 + 6  edx / Lx + 6  edy / Ly) / (Lx  Ly) = 2.635
ksf
Minimum base pressure; qmin = min(q1,q2,q3,q4) = 2.635 ksf
Maximum base pressure; qmax = max(q1,q2,q3,q4) = 2.635 ksf

Allowable bearing capacity

Allowable bearing capacity; qallow = qallow_Gross = 2.688 ksf

 qmax / qallow = 0.980
PASS - Allowable bearing capacity exceeds design base pressure

FOOTING DESIGN (ACI318)

In accordance with ACI318-05 incorporating Errata as of April 10, 2012
Material details
Compressive strength of concrete; f’c = 4000 psi
Yield strength of reinforcement; fy = 60000 psi
Cover to reinforcement; cnom = 3 in
Concrete type; Normal weight
Concrete modification factor;  = 1.00
Column type; Concrete
Analysis and design of concrete footing
Load combinations per ASCE 7-05
1.4D (0.276)
1.2D + 1.6L + 0.5Lr (0.591)
Combination 2 results: 1.2D + 1.6L + 0.5Lr
Forces on foundation
Ultimate force in z-axis; Fuz = D  A  (Fswt + Fsoil + FDsur) + L  A  FLsur + D  FDz1
+ L  FLz1 = 91.3 kips
Moments on foundation
Ultimate moment in x-axis, about x is 0; Mux = D  (A  (Fswt + Fsoil + FDsur)  Lx / 2) + L  A  FLsur 
Lx / 2 + D  (FDz1  x1) + L  (FLz1  x1) = 228.1 kip_ft
Ultimate moment in y-axis, about y is 0; Muy = D  (A  (Fswt + Fsoil + FDsur)  Ly / 2) + L  A  FLsur 
Ly / 2 + D  (FDz1  y1) + L  (FLz1  y1) = 228.1 kip_ft
Eccentricity of base reaction
Eccentricity of base reaction in x-axis; eux = Mux / Fuz - Lx / 2 = 0 in
Eccentricity of base reaction in y-axis; euy = Muy / Fuz - Ly / 2 = 0 in
Pad base pressures
qu1 = Fuz  (1 - 6  eux / Lx - 6  euy / Ly) / (Lx  Ly) = 3.65 ksf
qu2 = Fuz  (1 - 6  eux / Lx + 6  euy / Ly) / (Lx  Ly) = 3.65 ksf
qu3 = Fuz  (1 + 6  eux / Lx - 6  euy / Ly) / (Lx  Ly) = 3.65 ksf
qu4 = Fuz  (1 + 6  eux / Lx + 6  euy / Ly) / (Lx  Ly) = 3.65 ksf
Minimum ultimate base pressure; qumin = min(qu1,qu2,qu3,qu4) = 3.65 ksf
Maximum ultimate base pressure; qumax = max(qu1,qu2,qu3,qu4) = 3.65 ksf
Shear diagram, x axis (kips)
 Moment diagram, x axis (kip_ft)

Moment design, x direction, positive moment

Ultimate bending moment; Mu.x.max = 32.465 kip_ft
Tension reinforcement provided; 7 No.4 bottom bars (8.9 in c/c)
Area of tension reinforcement provided; Asx.bot.prov = 1.4 in2
Minimum area of reinforcement (10.5.4); As.min = 0.0018  Ly  h = 1.296 in2
PASS - Area of reinforcement provided exceeds minimum
Maximum spacing of reinforcement (10.5.4); smax = min(3  h, 18 in) = 18 in
PASS - Maximum permissible reinforcement spacing exceeds actual spacing
Depth to tension reinforcement; d = h - cnom - x.bot / 2 = 8.750 in
Depth of compression block; a = Asx.bot.prov  fy / (0.85  f'c  Ly) = 0.412 in
Neutral axis factor; 1 = 0.85
Depth to neutral axis; c = a / 1 = 0.484 in
Strain in tensile reinforcement (10.3.5); t = 0.003  d / c - 0.003 = 0.05119
PASS - Tensile strain exceeds minimum required, 0.004
Nominal moment capacity; Mn = Asx.bot.prov  fy  (d - a / 2) = 59.809 kip_ft
Flexural strength reduction factor; f = min(max(0.65 + (t - 0.002)  (250 / 3), 0.65), 0.9) =
0.900
Design moment capacity; Mn = f  Mn = 53.828 kip_ft
Mu.x.max / Mn = 0.603
PASS - Design moment capacity exceeds ultimate moment load
One-way shear design, x direction
Ultimate shear force; Vu.x = 20.882 kips
Depth to reinforcement; dv = h - cnom - x.bot / 2 = 8.75 in
Shear strength reduction factor; v = 0.75
Nominal shear capacity (Eq. 11-3); Vn = 2    (f'c  1 psi)  Ly  dv = 66.408 kips
Design shear capacity; Vn = v  Vn = 49.806 kips
Vu.x / Vn = 0.419
PASS - Design shear capacity exceeds ultimate shear load
Shear diagram, y axis (kips)
 Moment diagram, y axis (kip_ft)

Moment design, y direction, positive moment

Ultimate bending moment; Mu.y.max = 32.465 kip_ft
Tension reinforcement provided; 8 No.4 bottom bars (7.6 in c/c)
Area of tension reinforcement provided; Asy.bot.prov = 1.6 in2
Minimum area of reinforcement (10.5.4); As.min = 0.0018  Lx  h = 1.296 in2
PASS - Area of reinforcement provided exceeds minimum
Maximum spacing of reinforcement (10.5.4); smax = min(3  h, 18 in) = 18 in
PASS - Maximum permissible reinforcement spacing exceeds actual spacing
Depth to tension reinforcement; d = h - cnom - x.bot - y.bot / 2 = 8.250 in
Depth of compression block; a = Asy.bot.prov  fy / (0.85  f'c  Lx) = 0.471 in
Neutral axis factor; 1 = 0.85
Depth to neutral axis; c = a / 1 = 0.554 in
Strain in tensile reinforcement (10.3.5); t = 0.003  d / c - 0.003 = 0.04170
PASS - Tensile strain exceeds minimum required, 0.004
Nominal moment capacity; Mn = Asy.bot.prov  fy  (d - a / 2) = 64.118 kip_ft
Flexural strength reduction factor; f = min(max(0.65 + (t - 0.002)  (250 / 3), 0.65), 0.9) =
0.900
Design moment capacity; Mn = f  Mn = 57.706 kip_ft
Mu.y.max / Mn = 0.563
PASS - Design moment capacity exceeds ultimate moment load
One-way shear design, y direction
Ultimate shear force; Vu.y = 20.882 kips
Depth to reinforcement; dv = h - cnom - x.bot - y.bot / 2 = 8.25 in
Shear strength reduction factor; v = 0.75
Nominal shear capacity (Eq. 11-3); Vn = 2    (f'c  1 psi)  Lx  dv = 62.613 kips
Design shear capacity; Vn = v  Vn = 46.96 kips
Vu.y / Vn = 0.445
PASS - Design shear capacity exceeds ultimate shear load
Two-way shear design at column 1
Depth to reinforcement; dv2 = 8.5 in
Shear perimeter length (11.12.1.2); lxp = 18.500 in
Shear perimeter width (11.12.1.2); lyp = 18.500 in
Shear perimeter (11.12.1.2); bo = 2  (lx1 + dv2) + 2  (ly1 + dv2) = 74.000 in
Shear area; Ap = lx,perim  ly,perim = 342.250 in2
Surcharge loaded area; Asur = Ap - lx1  ly1 = 242.250 in2
Ultimate bearing pressure at center of shear area; qup.avg = 3.650 ksf
Ultimate shear load; Fup = D  FDz1 + L  FLz1 + D  Ap  Fswt + D  Asur  Fsoil +
D  Asur  FDsur + L  Asur  FLsur - qup.avg  Ap = 67.357 kips
Ultimate shear stress from vertical load; vug = max(Fup / (bo  dv2),0 psi) = 107.086 psi
Column geometry factor (11.12.2.1);  = ly1 / lx1 = 1.00
Column location factor (11.12.2.1); s =40
Concrete shear strength (11.12.2.1); vcpa = (2 + 4 / )    (f'c  1 psi) = 379.473 psi
vcpb = (s  dv2 / bo + 2)    (f'c  1 psi) = 417.079 psi
vcpc = 4    (f'c  1 psi) = 252.982 psi
vcp = min(vcpa,vcpb,vcpc) = 252.982 psi
Shear strength reduction factor; v = 0.75
Nominal shear stress capacity (Eq. 11-2); vn = vcp = 252.982 psi
Design shear stress capacity (Eq. 11-1); vn = v  vn = 189.737 psi
vug / vn = 0.564
PASS - Design shear stress capacity exceeds ultimate shear stress load